Department of Health and Human Services December 21, 2005 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents
Results 1 - 15 of 15
National Toxicology Program (NTP); Center for the Evaluation of Risks to Human Reproduction (CERHR); Plans for Future Expert Panel Evaluations of Bisphenol A and Hydroxyurea; Request for Comments and Nominations of Scientists Qualified To Serve on These Expert Panels
The CERHR plans to convene two expert panels to evaluate the scientific evidence regarding the potential reproductive and developmental toxicities of bisphenol A and hydroxyurea. Each expert panel will consist of approximately 12 scientists, selected for their expertise in various aspects of reproductive and developmental toxicology and other relevant areas of science. The CERHR invites the submission of public comments on these chemicals and the nomination of scientists to serve on the expert panels for their evaluation (see SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION below). These meetings are tentatively scheduled for late 2006, although the exact dates and locations have not yet been established. As plans are finalized, they will be announced in the Federal Register and posted on the NTP Web site (https://ntp-server.niehs.nih.gov). CERHR expert panel meetings are open to the public with time scheduled for oral public comment.
Native American Programs
Pursuant to section 814 of the Native American Programs Act of 1974 (the Act) as amended by 42 U.S.C. 2991 et seq., ANA herein describes its issuance of final interpretive rules, general statements of policy and rules of agency procedure or practice in relation to the Social and Economic Development Strategies (SEDS), Native Language Preservation and Maintenance (hereinafter referred to as Native Language), Environmental Regulatory Enhancement (hereinafter referred to as Environmental), Environmental Mitigation (hereinafter referred to as Mitigation) programs and any Special Initiatives. Under the statute, ANA is required to provide members of the public an opportunity to comment on proposed changes in interpretive rules, statements of general policy and rules of agency procedure or practice and to give notice of the final adoption of such changes at least thirty (30) days before the changes become effective. The notice also provides additional information about ANA's plan for administering the programs.
Proposed Collection; Comment Request; A Process/Outcome Evaluation of Parkinson's Disease Research Centers
In compliance with the requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, for opportunity for public comment on proposed data collection projects, the National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) Office of Science Policy and Planning, the National Institute of Health (NIH) will publish periodic summaries of proposed projects to be submitted to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval. Proposed Collection: Title: A Process/Outcome Evaluation of Parkinson's Disease Research Centers. Type of Information Collection Request: New. Need and Use of Information Collection: This study is primarily an outcome evaluation, designed to assess the extent to which the NINDS-funded Morris K. Udall Centers for Excellence in Parkinson's Disease Research have achieved the program's short-term and long-term goals. The study also includes elements of a process evaluation in its examination of the major activities conducted by the Udall Centers, the relationship between Center activities and the achievement of program goals, and the NINDS management of the program. The results of the full-scale evaluation should be very helpful to NINDS in identifying the most relevant measures for tracking the future progress of the Centers, developing strategies to enhance the program's effectiveness, and improving program management. NINDS will also use the findings to inform its National Advisory Neurological Disorders and Stroke Council, and to address inquiries from the public regarding the impact of the Udall Centers Program. Lastly, Udall Center awardees will be able to use the evaluation results to improve the performance of their Centers; and other NIH Institutes and Centers may use the methodology and results of this evaluation to guide their own centers assessments. Frequency of Response: Once or twice. Affected Public: Researchers, Not-for-profit institutions; Federal Government; individuals or households. Type of Respondents: Adult professionals. The annual reporting burden is represented in the following table:
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.