Native American Programs, 75821-75823 [E5-7592]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 21, 2005 / Notices
Avenida Encinas, Suite 106,
Carlsbad, CA 92008. Officers:
Christoper Ramey, Asst. Vice
President, (Qualifying Individual)
James Kinyon, President
Berklay Air Services, 181 East Jamaica
Avenue, Valley Stream, NY 11580.
Officers: Greg Klainberg, Manager
Exports, (Qualifying Individual)
Bernard Klainberg, CEO
Dated: December 16, 2005.
Bryant L. VanBrakle,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. E5–7618 Filed 12–20–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6730–01–P
FEDERAL RESERVE SYSTEM
erjones on PROD1PC68 with NOTICES
Formations of, Acquisitions by, and
Mergers of Bank Holding Companies
The companies listed in this notice
have applied to the Board for approval,
pursuant to the Bank Holding Company
Act of 1956 (12 U.S.C. 1841 et seq.)
(BHC Act), Regulation Y (12 CFR part
225), and all other applicable statutes
and regulations to become a bank
holding company and/or to acquire the
assets or the ownership of, control of, or
the power to vote shares of a bank or
bank holding company and all of the
banks and nonbanking companies
owned by the bank holding company,
including the companies listed below.
The applications listed below, as well
as other related filings required by the
Board, are available for immediate
inspection at the Federal Reserve Bank
indicated. The application also will be
available for inspection at the offices of
the Board of Governors. Interested
persons may express their views in
writing on the standards enumerated in
the BHC Act (12 U.S.C. 1842(c)). If the
proposal also involves the acquisition of
a nonbanking company, the review also
includes whether the acquisition of the
nonbanking company complies with the
standards in section 4 of the BHC Act
(12 U.S.C. 1843). Unless otherwise
noted, nonbanking activities will be
conducted throughout the United States.
Additional information on all bank
holding companies may be obtained
from the National Information Center
website at https://www.ffiec.gov/nic/.
Unless otherwise noted, comments
regarding each of these applications
must be received at the Reserve Bank
indicated or the offices of the Board of
Governors not later than January 17,
2006.
A. Federal Reserve Bank of Atlanta
(Andre Anderson, Vice President) 1000
Peachtree Street, NE., Atlanta, Georgia
30303:
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:25 Dec 20, 2005
Jkt 208001
1. CenterState Banks of Florida, Inc.,
Winter Haven, Florida; to acquire 100
percent of the voting shares of
CenterState Bank Mid Florida, Leesburg,
Florida.
B. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas
City (Donna J. Ward, Assistant Vice
President) 925 Grand Avenue, Kansas
City, Missouri 64198-0001:
1. Pawhuska Financial Corp.,
Pawhuska, Oklahoma; to become a bank
holding company by acquiring 100
percent of the voting shares of First
National Bank in Pawhuska, Pawhuska,
Oklahoma.
Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve
System, December 16, 2005.
Robert deV. Frierson,
Deputy Secretary of the Board.
[FR Doc. E5–7623 Filed 12–20–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6210–01–S
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Centers for Disease Control and
Prevention
Intelligence Reform and Terrorism
Prevention Act of 2004 Delegation of
Authority
Notice is hereby given that I have
delegated to the Director, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention (CDC),
with authority to redelegate, the
authorities vested in the Secretary of
Health and Human Services, under
Section 7211, Minimum Standards for
Birth Certificates (5 U.S.C. 301 note), of
the Intelligence Reform and Terrorism
Prevention Act of 2004, Public Law
108–458, as amended hereafter.
This delegation excludes the authority
to submit reports to the Congress, but
should be exercised under the
Department’s existing delegation of
authority and policy on regulations.
This delegation is effective upon
signature. In addition, I hereby affirm
and ratify any actions taken by you or
your subordinates which involved the
exercise of the authorities delegated
herein prior to the effective day of the
delegation.
Dated: December 15, 2005.
Michael O. Leavitt,
Secretary.
[FR Doc. 05–24312 Filed 12–21–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4160–18–M
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
75821
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and
Families
Native American Programs
Administration for Native
Americans (ANA).
ACTION: Notice of Final Issuance ANA
Program Policies and Procedures.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 814 of the
Native American Programs Act of 1974
(the Act) as amended by 42 U.S.C. 2991
et seq., ANA herein describes its
issuance of final interpretive rules,
general statements of policy and rules of
agency procedure or practice in relation
to the Social and Economic
Development Strategies (SEDS), Native
Language Preservation and Maintenance
(hereinafter referred to as Native
Language), Environmental Regulatory
Enhancement (hereinafter referred to as
Environmental), Environmental
Mitigation (hereinafter referred to as
Mitigation) programs and any Special
Initiatives. Under the statute, ANA is
required to provide members of the
public an opportunity to comment on
proposed changes in interpretive rules,
statements of general policy and rules of
agency procedure or practice and to give
notice of the final adoption of such
changes at least thirty (30) days before
the changes become effective. The
notice also provides additional
information about ANA’s plan for
administering the programs.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Sheila K. Cooper, Director of Program
Operations, toll-free at (877) 922–9262.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section
814 of the Native American Programs
Act of 1974, as amended, requires ANA
to provide notice of its proposed
interpretive rules, statements of policy
and rules of agency organization,
procedure or practice. In accordance
with statute, these clarifications,
modifications and new text will appear
in the ANA FY06 Program
Announcements (PAs) for SEDS, Native
Language, Environmental, Mitigation
and SEDS Special Initiatives. This
notice serves to fulfill this requirement.
Additional Information: ANA
received one public comment from a
Federally recognized Tribe. The
commenter provided a comment on the
electronic application submission topic
and general comments that ANA will
respond to under separate
correspondence that do not address the
Notice of Public Comment (NOPC). The
following NOPC items will be
considered as the final FY06 ANA
E:\FR\FM\21DEN1.SGM
21DEN1
75822
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 21, 2005 / Notices
interpretive rules, statements of policy
and rules of agency organization,
procedure or practice.
I. Environmental Regulatory
Enhancement
ANA Evaluation Criteria
Project Approach: In an effort to
adhere to the Congressional intent of the
legislation and to clarify the program
purpose that has historically prompted
numerous questions and created
application and project development
inconsistencies, ANA will now request
the following information from
applicants to be addressed within the
ANA evaluation criterion:
Applicants are required to describe a
land base or other resource, i.e., river or
body of water, over which they exercise
jurisdiction to implement Tribal
regulation of environmental quality.
II. Definitions
The following definition will be used
in the appropriate program-specific
FY06 PAs. ANA has clarified many
areas that applicants have historically
found difficult to understand and that
have previously prompted numerous
questions and created application and
project development inconsistencies.
The ANA PAs will now include an
additional definition for the following
term:
Logic Model: A logic model is a
systematic and visual way to present
and share your understanding of the
relationships among the resources you
have to operate your program, the
activities you plan and the changes or
results you hope to achieve.
erjones on PROD1PC68 with NOTICES
III. Impact Monitoring
Section 811(a)(1) of the Act requires
that the Commissioner provide for the
evaluation of projects assisted under
this title, including evaluations that
describe and measure the impact of
such projects, their effectiveness in
achieving stated goals, their impact on
related programs and their structure and
mechanisms for delivery of services.
Section 811(a)2 of the Act requires that
ANA evaluate projects awarded under
the Act not less frequently than once
every third year. ANA will consider (1)
geographic location; (2) grant award
amount; and (3) length of project period,
when selecting projects for evaluation.
Grantees will be given a notification of
ANA’s intent to review thirty (30) days
prior to the on-site evaluation.
Evaluations shall be conducted by
persons not directly involved in the
administration of the project evaluated.
In FY03 ANA began a process to
enhance its capacity to conduct program
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:25 Dec 20, 2005
Jkt 208001
monitoring and evaluation. This process
allows ANA to monitor the completion
of applicant project goals, the use of
Federal funds, and the applicant’s
success in accomplishing its project
mission. The process includes
improving ANA’s capacity through
enhanced information technology
systems to track performance-based
indicators such as jobs, project
outcomes and community impacts. Each
applicant for ANA funding must
propose a stand-alone project that will
be completed or self-sustained by the
end of the grant term, and must have
measurable results. (See Notice of Public
Comment on the Proposed Adoption of
ANA Program Policies and Procedures:
68 FR 64686; November 14, 2003.)
Performance indicators have been
introduced as application criteria and
are measurement descriptions used to
identify outcomes or results of the
project. Outcomes or results must be
measurable to determine that the project
achieved its desired objective and can
be independently verified through
monitoring and evaluation. (Legal
authority: Sections 803(a) and (d) and
803C of the Native American Programs
Act of 1974 as amended by 42 U.S.C.
2991b and 2991b–3.) (See Notice of
Public Comment on the Adoption of
Impact Indicators: 70 FR 6686 February
8, 2005.)
In addition, ANA Training and
Technical Assistance (T/TA) providers
will be performing on-site technical
assistance visits for those grantees
identified as potentially at-risk for
project implementation.
IV. Training and Technical Assistance
On-Site Activity
45 CFR 74.51(g) and 92.40(e) allow
Department of Health and Human
Services staff or representatives to
conduct on-site monitoring of grantees
as warranted by program needs. Based
on the authority provided, on-site
monitoring and evaluation is necessary
to determine if the amount awarded is
a productive and effective use of funds
and serves the community’s needs.
When determined as appropriate,
ANA’s T/TA providers will conduct an
on-site visit to validate progress and
outcomes proposed by the grantee to
ensure project integrity and to offer
technical assistance and guidance to
support project activities. Such
instances when an on-site visit is
deemed appropriate are: Nonsubmission or untimely progress
reporting; delayed start in project
implementation; inconsistent Federal
funds draw-downs in relation to
approved work plan; or other grant/
project management concerns.
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
In the case of a multi-year grant, this
activity will help ANA determine if
continued funding is justified. In
addition, 45 CFR 1336.40 requires that
progress reports and continuation
applications from ANA grantees contain
sufficient information for ANA to
determine the extent to which the
recipient satisfies ANA project
evaluation standards. Sufficient
information means information
adequate to enable ANA to compare the
recipient’s accomplishments with the
goals and activities of the grantee’s
approved work plan and with ANA
project evaluation criteria. Grantees
identified as potentially at-risk for
project implementation will receive an
on-site visit by one of ANA’s T/TA
providers. In collaboration, the T/TA
provider and the grantee will identify
challenges or barriers to the project and
develop a plan to bring the project into
compliance with its approved Objective
Work Plan. On-site visits shall be
conducted by persons not directly
involved in the administration of the
project.
V. Electronic Application Submission
Pursuant to the Federal Financial
Assistance Management Improvement
Act (Pub. L. 106–107), HHS is
improving the efficiency and
coordination of its grant-making
processes by participating in the Federal
Government’s Grant Streamlining
Initiative. For all FY06 competitions,
ANA will participate in the Grants.gov
process, which allows applicants the
opportunity to submit applications
electronically. Applicants are not
required to submit electronically and
can still submit hard copy applications.
The applicant is responsible for
ensuring on-time electronic submission
is fully achieved. The following
activities and application submission
requirements will become effective in
FY06:
• ANA will no longer publish PAs in
the Federal Register. Official ANA PAs
will be posted on the Grants.gov Web
site. PAs will also be posted on the ANA
Web site and on the ANA T/TA
providers’ Web sites.
• Due to limitations on the number of
times the Objective Work Plan form can
be replicated within the Grants.gov
system, applicants will be limited to no
more than six (6) project objectives per
budget period. This limitation applies to
all applicants regardless of type of
submission format: Hard copy or
electronic submission.
Comment and Response
Discussion on Comment: The
commenter recommended that ANA
E:\FR\FM\21DEN1.SGM
21DEN1
75823
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 244 / Wednesday, December 21, 2005 / Notices
monitor the electronic grants process of
another Federal agency in order to
ensure that the ACF process proceeds in
an efficient and timely manner.
Response: ANA, in compliance with
Public Law 106–107, must offer an
electronic grants submission venue;
however, the public is not required to
submit grant applications via the
Grants.gov system. ANA will monitor
the electronic submission process for
ANA grant applications through the
Grants.gov system throughout the
upcoming fiscal year.
VI. Environmental Mitigation
ANA received pass-through funds
from the Department of Defense for
Tribes and Tribal organizations to offset
the effects of military actions at
Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS).
ANA will announce the availability of
these funds in FY06. A request for
financial assistance in this program area
does not require a non-Federal share
match requirement.
VII. SEDS Special Initiatives
ANA has the discretionary authority
to make awards in support of special
initiatives, including but not limited to,
healthy marriage and relationships,
fatherhood, positive youth development
and emergency support to Native
communities affected by man-made or
natural disasters. In FY06, ANA will
announce the availability of funding for
special initiatives when practicable. A
request for financial assistance for any
of the special initiatives will require a
non-Federal share match requirement.
VIII. Post Award Training
ANA, through contracted services,
conducts regional post award training.
Past practice has been to provide
funding to new grantees for attendance
at this training in order to provide
additional assistance and information
on managing a Federal award. In FY06,
ANA will require all applicants to
include in their Federal budget request
the costs associated for the proposed
project’s finance person and the project
manager to attend this regional training.
It is determined that due to many
reasons, largely grantee staff turnover,
every grantee receiving an ANA award
will benefit from the information
provided at post award training;
therefore, the expense is considered
reasonable for all applicants to include
in their budget request and also reflect
in the activity in their Objective Work
Plans.
IX. ANA Administrative Policy
The following policy will be used in
all FY06 PAs. ANA has clarified many
areas that applicants have historically
found difficult to understand and that
have previously prompted numerous
questions and created application and
project development inconsistencies.
The ANA PAs will now include this
clarified policy:
• If the applicant, other than a Tribe
or an Alaska Native Village government,
is proposing a project benefiting Native
Americans, Alaska Natives, or both, it
must provide assurance that its duly
elected or appointed board of directors
is representative of the community to be
served. An applicant’s governing board
will be considered representative of the
community to be served if the applicant
demonstrates that at least a majority of
the board individuals fall into one or
more of the following categories: (1) A
current or past member of the
community to be served; (2) a
prospective participant or beneficiary of
the project to be funded; (3) have
experience working with the
community to be served by the project;
or (4) have a cultural relationship with
the community be to served.
Dated: December 14, 2005.
Quanah Crossland Stamps,
Commissioner, Administration for Native
Americans.
[FR Doc. E5–7592 Filed 12–20–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184–01–P
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND
HUMAN SERVICES
National Institutes of Health
Proposed Collection; Comment
Request; A Process/Outcome
Evaluation of Parkinson’s Disease
Research Centers
SUMMARY: In compliance with the
requirement of Section 3506(c)(2)(A) of
Number of
respondents
erjones on PROD1PC68 with NOTICES
Type of respondents
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
for opportunity for public comment on
proposed data collection projects, the
National Institute of Neurological
Disorders and Stroke (NINDS) Office of
Science Policy and Planning, the
National Institute of Health (NIH) will
publish periodic summaries of proposed
projects to be submitted to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB) for
review and approval.
Proposed Collection: Title: A Process/
Outcome Evaluation of Parkinson’s
Disease Research Centers. Type of
Information Collection Request: New.
Need and Use of Information Collection:
This study is primarily an outcome
evaluation, designed to assess the extent
to which the NINDS-funded Morris K.
Udall Centers for Excellence in
Parkinson’s Disease Research have
achieved the program’s short-term and
long-term goals. The study also includes
elements of a process evaluation in its
examination of the major activities
conducted by the Udall Centers, the
relationship between Center activities
and the achievement of program goals,
and the NINDS management of the
program. The results of the full-scale
evaluation should be very helpful to
NINDS in identifying the most relevant
measures for tracking the future
progress of the Centers, developing
strategies to enhance the program’s
effectiveness, and improving program
management. NINDS will also use the
findings to inform its National Advisory
Neurological Disorders and Stroke
Council, and to address inquiries from
the public regarding the impact of the
Udall Centers Program. Lastly, Udall
Center awardees will be able to use the
evaluation results to improve the
performance of their Centers; and other
NIH Institutes and Centers may use the
methodology and results of this
evaluation to guide their own centers
assessments. Frequency of Response:
Once or twice. Affected Public:
Researchers, Not-for-profit institutions;
Federal Government; individuals or
households. Type of Respondents: Adult
professionals.
The annual reporting burden is
represented in the following table:
Frequency of
response
Average time
per response
(hour)
Annual hour
burden
Center Directors ...............................................................................................
Project/Core Directors .....................................................................................
Comparison Group ..........................................................................................
13
54
54
2
1
1
1.5
1.5
1.0
39
81
54
Totals ........................................................................................................
121
........................
........................
174
VerDate Aug<31>2005
15:25 Dec 20, 2005
Jkt 208001
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
E:\FR\FM\21DEN1.SGM
21DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 244 (Wednesday, December 21, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 75821-75823]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E5-7592]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Administration for Children and Families
Native American Programs
AGENCY: Administration for Native Americans (ANA).
ACTION: Notice of Final Issuance ANA Program Policies and Procedures.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Pursuant to section 814 of the Native American Programs Act of
1974 (the Act) as amended by 42 U.S.C. 2991 et seq., ANA herein
describes its issuance of final interpretive rules, general statements
of policy and rules of agency procedure or practice in relation to the
Social and Economic Development Strategies (SEDS), Native Language
Preservation and Maintenance (hereinafter referred to as Native
Language), Environmental Regulatory Enhancement (hereinafter referred
to as Environmental), Environmental Mitigation (hereinafter referred to
as Mitigation) programs and any Special Initiatives. Under the statute,
ANA is required to provide members of the public an opportunity to
comment on proposed changes in interpretive rules, statements of
general policy and rules of agency procedure or practice and to give
notice of the final adoption of such changes at least thirty (30) days
before the changes become effective. The notice also provides
additional information about ANA's plan for administering the programs.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Sheila K. Cooper, Director of Program
Operations, toll-free at (877) 922-9262.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Section 814 of the Native American Programs
Act of 1974, as amended, requires ANA to provide notice of its proposed
interpretive rules, statements of policy and rules of agency
organization, procedure or practice. In accordance with statute, these
clarifications, modifications and new text will appear in the ANA FY06
Program Announcements (PAs) for SEDS, Native Language, Environmental,
Mitigation and SEDS Special Initiatives. This notice serves to fulfill
this requirement.
Additional Information: ANA received one public comment from a
Federally recognized Tribe. The commenter provided a comment on the
electronic application submission topic and general comments that ANA
will respond to under separate correspondence that do not address the
Notice of Public Comment (NOPC). The following NOPC items will be
considered as the final FY06 ANA
[[Page 75822]]
interpretive rules, statements of policy and rules of agency
organization, procedure or practice.
I. Environmental Regulatory Enhancement
ANA Evaluation Criteria
Project Approach: In an effort to adhere to the Congressional
intent of the legislation and to clarify the program purpose that has
historically prompted numerous questions and created application and
project development inconsistencies, ANA will now request the following
information from applicants to be addressed within the ANA evaluation
criterion:
Applicants are required to describe a land base or other resource,
i.e., river or body of water, over which they exercise jurisdiction to
implement Tribal regulation of environmental quality.
II. Definitions
The following definition will be used in the appropriate program-
specific FY06 PAs. ANA has clarified many areas that applicants have
historically found difficult to understand and that have previously
prompted numerous questions and created application and project
development inconsistencies. The ANA PAs will now include an additional
definition for the following term:
Logic Model: A logic model is a systematic and visual way to
present and share your understanding of the relationships among the
resources you have to operate your program, the activities you plan and
the changes or results you hope to achieve.
III. Impact Monitoring
Section 811(a)(1) of the Act requires that the Commissioner provide
for the evaluation of projects assisted under this title, including
evaluations that describe and measure the impact of such projects,
their effectiveness in achieving stated goals, their impact on related
programs and their structure and mechanisms for delivery of services.
Section 811(a)2 of the Act requires that ANA evaluate projects awarded
under the Act not less frequently than once every third year. ANA will
consider (1) geographic location; (2) grant award amount; and (3)
length of project period, when selecting projects for evaluation.
Grantees will be given a notification of ANA's intent to review thirty
(30) days prior to the on-site evaluation. Evaluations shall be
conducted by persons not directly involved in the administration of the
project evaluated.
In FY03 ANA began a process to enhance its capacity to conduct
program monitoring and evaluation. This process allows ANA to monitor
the completion of applicant project goals, the use of Federal funds,
and the applicant's success in accomplishing its project mission. The
process includes improving ANA's capacity through enhanced information
technology systems to track performance-based indicators such as jobs,
project outcomes and community impacts. Each applicant for ANA funding
must propose a stand-alone project that will be completed or self-
sustained by the end of the grant term, and must have measurable
results. (See Notice of Public Comment on the Proposed Adoption of ANA
Program Policies and Procedures: 68 FR 64686; November 14, 2003.)
Performance indicators have been introduced as application criteria
and are measurement descriptions used to identify outcomes or results
of the project. Outcomes or results must be measurable to determine
that the project achieved its desired objective and can be
independently verified through monitoring and evaluation. (Legal
authority: Sections 803(a) and (d) and 803C of the Native American
Programs Act of 1974 as amended by 42 U.S.C. 2991b and 2991b-3.) (See
Notice of Public Comment on the Adoption of Impact Indicators: 70 FR
6686 February 8, 2005.)
In addition, ANA Training and Technical Assistance (T/TA) providers
will be performing on-site technical assistance visits for those
grantees identified as potentially at-risk for project implementation.
IV. Training and Technical Assistance On-Site Activity
45 CFR 74.51(g) and 92.40(e) allow Department of Health and Human
Services staff or representatives to conduct on-site monitoring of
grantees as warranted by program needs. Based on the authority
provided, on-site monitoring and evaluation is necessary to determine
if the amount awarded is a productive and effective use of funds and
serves the community's needs. When determined as appropriate, ANA's T/
TA providers will conduct an on-site visit to validate progress and
outcomes proposed by the grantee to ensure project integrity and to
offer technical assistance and guidance to support project activities.
Such instances when an on-site visit is deemed appropriate are: Non-
submission or untimely progress reporting; delayed start in project
implementation; inconsistent Federal funds draw-downs in relation to
approved work plan; or other grant/project management concerns.
In the case of a multi-year grant, this activity will help ANA
determine if continued funding is justified. In addition, 45 CFR
1336.40 requires that progress reports and continuation applications
from ANA grantees contain sufficient information for ANA to determine
the extent to which the recipient satisfies ANA project evaluation
standards. Sufficient information means information adequate to enable
ANA to compare the recipient's accomplishments with the goals and
activities of the grantee's approved work plan and with ANA project
evaluation criteria. Grantees identified as potentially at-risk for
project implementation will receive an on-site visit by one of ANA's T/
TA providers. In collaboration, the T/TA provider and the grantee will
identify challenges or barriers to the project and develop a plan to
bring the project into compliance with its approved Objective Work
Plan. On-site visits shall be conducted by persons not directly
involved in the administration of the project.
V. Electronic Application Submission
Pursuant to the Federal Financial Assistance Management Improvement
Act (Pub. L. 106-107), HHS is improving the efficiency and coordination
of its grant-making processes by participating in the Federal
Government's Grant Streamlining Initiative. For all FY06 competitions,
ANA will participate in the Grants.gov process, which allows applicants
the opportunity to submit applications electronically. Applicants are
not required to submit electronically and can still submit hard copy
applications. The applicant is responsible for ensuring on-time
electronic submission is fully achieved. The following activities and
application submission requirements will become effective in FY06:
ANA will no longer publish PAs in the Federal Register.
Official ANA PAs will be posted on the Grants.gov Web site. PAs will
also be posted on the ANA Web site and on the ANA T/TA providers' Web
sites.
Due to limitations on the number of times the Objective
Work Plan form can be replicated within the Grants.gov system,
applicants will be limited to no more than six (6) project objectives
per budget period. This limitation applies to all applicants regardless
of type of submission format: Hard copy or electronic submission.
Comment and Response
Discussion on Comment: The commenter recommended that ANA
[[Page 75823]]
monitor the electronic grants process of another Federal agency in
order to ensure that the ACF process proceeds in an efficient and
timely manner.
Response: ANA, in compliance with Public Law 106-107, must offer an
electronic grants submission venue; however, the public is not required
to submit grant applications via the Grants.gov system. ANA will
monitor the electronic submission process for ANA grant applications
through the Grants.gov system throughout the upcoming fiscal year.
VI. Environmental Mitigation
ANA received pass-through funds from the Department of Defense for
Tribes and Tribal organizations to offset the effects of military
actions at Formerly Used Defense Sites (FUDS). ANA will announce the
availability of these funds in FY06. A request for financial assistance
in this program area does not require a non-Federal share match
requirement.
VII. SEDS Special Initiatives
ANA has the discretionary authority to make awards in support of
special initiatives, including but not limited to, healthy marriage and
relationships, fatherhood, positive youth development and emergency
support to Native communities affected by man-made or natural
disasters. In FY06, ANA will announce the availability of funding for
special initiatives when practicable. A request for financial
assistance for any of the special initiatives will require a non-
Federal share match requirement.
VIII. Post Award Training
ANA, through contracted services, conducts regional post award
training. Past practice has been to provide funding to new grantees for
attendance at this training in order to provide additional assistance
and information on managing a Federal award. In FY06, ANA will require
all applicants to include in their Federal budget request the costs
associated for the proposed project's finance person and the project
manager to attend this regional training. It is determined that due to
many reasons, largely grantee staff turnover, every grantee receiving
an ANA award will benefit from the information provided at post award
training; therefore, the expense is considered reasonable for all
applicants to include in their budget request and also reflect in the
activity in their Objective Work Plans.
IX. ANA Administrative Policy
The following policy will be used in all FY06 PAs. ANA has
clarified many areas that applicants have historically found difficult
to understand and that have previously prompted numerous questions and
created application and project development inconsistencies. The ANA
PAs will now include this clarified policy:
If the applicant, other than a Tribe or an Alaska Native
Village government, is proposing a project benefiting Native Americans,
Alaska Natives, or both, it must provide assurance that its duly
elected or appointed board of directors is representative of the
community to be served. An applicant's governing board will be
considered representative of the community to be served if the
applicant demonstrates that at least a majority of the board
individuals fall into one or more of the following categories: (1) A
current or past member of the community to be served; (2) a prospective
participant or beneficiary of the project to be funded; (3) have
experience working with the community to be served by the project; or
(4) have a cultural relationship with the community be to served.
Dated: December 14, 2005.
Quanah Crossland Stamps,
Commissioner, Administration for Native Americans.
[FR Doc. E5-7592 Filed 12-20-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4184-01-P