Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From India: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review; 2013-2014
For the final results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty (AD) order on polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and strip (PET Film) from India, we find that Jindal Poly Films Limited (Jindal) and the four-non selected respondents made sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value; we also find that SRF Limited (SRF) did not make sales of subject merchandise at less than normal value. The period of review is July 1, 2013, through June 30, 2014.
Polyethylene Terephthalate Film, Sheet, and Strip From India: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review; 2013
On August 6, 2015, the Department published the preliminary results of the administrative review of the countervailing duty order on polyethylene terephthalate film, sheet, and strip (PET film) from India.\1\ The period of review (POR) is January 1, 2013, through December 31, 2013.\2\ Based on an analysis of the comments received, the Department has made changes to the subsidy rate determined for Jindal Poly Films Limited (Jindal). The final subsidy rates are listed in the ``Final Results of Administrative Review'' section below.
Potassium Permanganate From the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the 2014 Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
In response to a request by Pacific Accelerator Limited (``PAL''), the Department of Commerce (the ``Department'') is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty (``AD'') order on potassium permanganate from the People's Republic of China (the ``PRC'') for the period of review (``POR'') January 1, 2014, through December 31, 2014.\1\ The Department preliminarily determines that PAL sold subject merchandise in the United States at prices below normal value (``NV'') during the POR. If these preliminary results are adopted in the final results, the Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries of subject merchandise during the POR. Interested parties are invited to comment on these preliminary results.
Aluminum Extrusions From the People's Republic of China: Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony With Final Scope Ruling and Notice of Amended Final Scope Ruling Pursuant to Court Decision
On January 20, 2016, the United States Court of International Trade (CIT or Court) sustained the Department of Commerce's (Department) third and final results of redetermination,\1\ in which the Department determined, under protest, that certain refrigerator/ freezer trim kits meet the description of excluded finished goods kits and are therefore not covered by the scope of the Orders,\2\ pursuant to the CIT's remand order in Meridian LLC v. United States, Court No. 13-00018, Slip Op. 15-67 (CIT June 23, 2015) (Meridian IV).