Environmental Protection Agency April 12, 2005 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents

Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request; Population-Based Pilot Study of Children's Environmental Health in Support of the National Children's Study, EPA ICR Number 2187.01
Document Number: 05-7334
Type: Notice
Date: 2005-04-12
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this document announces that EPA is planning to submit a proposed Information Collection Request (ICR) to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). This is a request for a new collection. Before submitting the ICR to OMB for review and approval, EPA is soliciting comments on specific aspects of the proposed information collection as described below.
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans Georgia: Vehicle Miles Traveled State Implementation Plan for the Atlanta 1-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area
Document Number: 05-7333
Type: Proposed Rule
Date: 2005-04-12
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
EPA is proposing to approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of Georgia, through the Georgia Environmental Protection Division (EPD) on June 30, 2004, regarding the Severe Area Vehicles Miles Traveled (VMT) SIP for the Atlanta 1-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area for the purpose of offsetting any growth in emissions from growth in VMT as required by the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act) as Amended in 1990. The State demonstrated that emissions from increases in VMT, or numbers of vehicle trips, within the Atlanta area did not rise above an established ceiling by 2004. The rationale for this proposed approval is set forth below.
Clean Water Act Section 303(d): Availability of List Decisions
Document Number: 05-7332
Type: Notice
Date: 2005-04-12
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
This notice announces the availability of EPA's final action identifying water quality limited segments and associated pollutants in Louisiana to be listed pursuant to Clean Water Act Section 303(d), and request for public comment. Section 303(d) requires that states submit and EPA approve or disapprove lists of waters for which existing technology-based pollution controls are not stringent enough to attain or maintain state water quality standards and for which total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) must be prepared. On March 31, 2005, EPA partially approved and partially disapproved Louisiana's 2004 303(d) submittal. Specifically, EPA approved Louisiana's listing of 444 water body-pollutant combinations, and associated priority rankings. EPA disapproved Louisiana's decisions not to list 14 water quality limited segments (or 17 water body-pollutant combinations). EPA identified these additional water bodies and pollutants along with priority rankings for inclusion on the 2004 Section 303(d) List. EPA is providing the public the opportunity to review its final decisions to add waters and pollutants to Louisiana's 2004 Section 303(d) List, as required by EPA's Public Participation regulations (40 CFR part 25). EPA will consider public comments and if necessary amend its final action on the additional water bodies and pollutants identified for inclusion on Louisiana's Final 2004 Section 303(d) List.
Clean Water Act Section 303(d): Availability of List Decisions
Document Number: 05-7331
Type: Notice
Date: 2005-04-12
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
This notice announces the availability of EPA's final action identifying water quality limited segments and associated pollutants in Louisiana to be listed pursuant to Clean Water Act Section 303(d), and request for public comment. Section 303(d) requires that states submit and EPA approve or disapprove lists of waters for which existing technology-based pollution controls are not stringent enough to attain or maintain state water quality standards and for which total maximum daily loads (TMDLs) must be prepared. On March 31, 2005, EPA partially approved and partially disapproved Louisiana's 2002 303(d) submittal. Specifically, EPA approved Louisiana's listing of 442 water body-pollutant combinations and associated priority rankings. EPA disapproved Louisiana's decisions not to list 44 water quality limited segments (or 69 water body-pollutant combinations). EPA identified these additional water bodies and pollutants along with priority rankings for inclusion on the 2002 Section 303(d) List. EPA is providing the public the opportunity to review its final decisions to add waters and pollutants to Louisiana's 2002 Section 303(d) List, as required by EPA's Public Participation regulations (40 CFR Part 25). EPA will consider public comments and if necessary amend its final action on the additional water bodies and pollutants identified for inclusion on Louisiana's Final 2002 Section 303(d) List.
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana
Document Number: 05-7329
Type: Rule
Date: 2005-04-12
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
The EPA is approving revisions to volatile organic compound (VOC) requirements for Transwheel Corporation (Transwheel) of Huntington County, Indiana. Transwheel owns and operates an aluminum wheel reprocessing plant at which it performs cold cleaner degreasing operations. On December 22, 2004, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) submitted a Commissioner's Order containing the revised requirements, and requested that EPA approve it as an amendment to the Indiana State Implementation Plan (SIP). The December 22, 2004, submission supplements a November 8, 2001, submission. IDEM is seeking EPA approval of ``an equivalent control device'' for Transwheel's degreasing operations, under 326 Indiana Administrative Code (IAC) 8-3-5(a)(5)(C).
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana
Document Number: 05-7328
Type: Proposed Rule
Date: 2005-04-12
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
EPA is proposing to approve revisions to volatile organic compound (VOC) requirements for Transwheel Corporation (Transwheel) of Huntington County, Indiana. Transwheel owns and operates an aluminum wheel reprocessing plant at which it performs cold cleaner degreasing operations. On December 22, 2004, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) submitted a Commissioner's Order containing the revised requirements, and requested that EPA approve it as an amendment to the Indiana State Implementation Plan (SIP). The December 22, 2004, submission supplements a November 8, 2001, submission. IDEM is seeking EPA approval of an ``equivalent control device'' for Transwheel's degreasing operations, under 326 Indiana Administrative Code (IAC) 8-3-5 (a)(5)(C).
Proposed CERCLA Administrative Cost Recovery Settlement Pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act; Greenberg Salvage Yard, Murphysboro, IL
Document Number: 05-7309
Type: Notice
Date: 2005-04-12
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
In accordance with section 122(h) of the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act, as amended (``CERCLA''), 42 U.S.C. 9622 (h), notice is hereby given of a proposed administrative settlement by consent, pursuant to CERCLA 122(h), 42 U.S.C. 9622(h) concerning Cox Parts & Services, Inc. and Thomas D. Cox Trucking, Inc. and the Greenberg Salvage Yard Site. The settlement requires that the Settling Parties shall pay to the EPA Hazardous Substance Superfund in eleven monthly installments the principal sum of $13,157 plus interest as defined in the Agreement for Recovery of Past Response Costs. The settlement includes EPA's covenant not to sue the Settling Parties pursuant to 107(a) of CERCLA, 42 U.S.C. 9607(a), to recover Past Response Costs. This covenant not to sue is conditioned upon the satisfactory performance by Settling Parties of their obligations under the Agreement. U.S. EPA is proposing this Agreement because it provides reimbursement to U.S. EPA for part of its past costs at the Greenberg Salvage Yard Site. For thirty (30) days following the date of publication of this notice, the agency will receive written comments relating to the settlement. The Agency will consider all comments received and may modify or withdraw its consent to the settlement if comments received disclose facts or considerations which indicate that the settlement is inappropriate, improper, or inadequate. The response to any comment received will be available for public inspection at the Superfund Division Record Center, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Blvd., Chicago, Illinois 60604-3590.
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans Georgia: Approval of Revisions to the Georgia State Implementation Plan
Document Number: 05-7308
Type: Rule
Date: 2005-04-12
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
The EPA is approving the State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the State of Georgia, through the Georgia Environmental Protection Division (GAEPD), on December 18, 2003. These revisions pertain to rules for Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance (I/ M). These revisions were the subject of a public hearing held on November 5, 2003, adopted by the Board of Natural Resources on December 3, 2003, and became State effective on December 25, 2003.
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans Georgia: Approval of Revisions to the Georgia State Implementation Plan
Document Number: 05-7307
Type: Proposed Rule
Date: 2005-04-12
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
The EPA is approving the State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the State of Georgia, through the Georgia Environmental Protection Division (GAEPD), on December 18, 2003. These revisions pertain to rules for Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance (I/ M). These revisions were the subject of a public hearing held on November 5, 2003, adopted by the Board of Natural Resources on December 3, 2003, and became State effective on December 25, 2003. In the Final Rules Section of this Federal Register, the EPA is approving the State's SIP revision as a direct final rule without prior proposal because the Agency views this as a noncontroversial submittal and anticipates no adverse comments. A detailed rationale for the approval is set forth in the direct final rule. If no significant, material, and adverse comments are received in response to this rule, no further activity is contemplated. If EPA receives adverse comments, the direct final rule will be withdrawn and all public comments received will be addressed in a subsequent final rule based on this rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this document. Any parties interested in commenting on this document should do so at this time.
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Texas; 15% Rate-of-Progress Plan and Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets, Dallas/Fort Worth Ozone Nonattainment Area
Document Number: 05-7305
Type: Rule
Date: 2005-04-12
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
EPA is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision for the State of Texas for the 15% Rate-of-Progress Plan (ROP) and 15% ROP Motor Vehicle Emissions Budget (MVEB) for the Dallas/Fort Worth (DFW) ozone nonattainment area. This plan shows planned emission reductions required by the Clean Air Act (Act) from 1990 to 1996 to improve air quality in the Dallas/Fort Worth Area. The reductions are from the 1990 base year emissions inventory. The MVEBs are used for determining conformity of transportation projects to the SIP. This action satisfies the Act's requirements for an ozone nonattainment area's 15% Rate-of-Progress Plan and approves the MVEBs under the ROP Plan.
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Texas; Agreed Orders in the Beaumont/Port Arthur Ozone Nonattainment Area
Document Number: 05-7304
Type: Rule
Date: 2005-04-12
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
The EPA is taking direct final action on revisions to the Texas State Implementation Plan (SIP). This rule making covers eight Agreed Orders with six companies in the Beaumont/Port Arthur (B/PA) nonattainment area. We are approving the eight Agreed Orders between the State of Texas and six companies in Southeast Texas as a strengthening of the Texas SIP. These Agreed Orders will contribute to the improvement in air quality in the B/PA nonattainment area and continue to contribute to the maintenance of the ozone standard in the southeastern portion of the State of Texas. The EPA is approving this SIP revision in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Clean Air Act (the Act), sections 110 and 116.
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Texas; Agreed Orders in the Beaumont/Port Arthur Ozone Nonattainment Area
Document Number: 05-7303
Type: Proposed Rule
Date: 2005-04-12
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
The EPA is proposing to take direct final action on revisions to the Texas State Implementation Plan (SIP). This rulemaking covers eight Agreed Orders with six companies in the Beaumont/Port Arthur (B/ PA) ozone nonattainment area. We are approving the eight Agreed Orders between the State of Texas and the six companies in Southeast Texas as a strengthening of the Texas SIP. These Agreed Orders will contribute to the improvement in air quality in the B/PA nonattainment area and will continue to contribute to the maintenance of the ozone standard in the southeastern portion of the State of Texas. The EPA is proposing to approve this SIP in accordance with the requirements of the Federal Clean Air Act (the Act), sections 110 and 116. In the ``Rules and Regulations'' section of this Federal Register, EPA is approving the State's SIP Revision as a direct final rule without prior proposal because the EPA views this as a noncontroversial revision and anticipates no adverse comment. The EPA has explained its reasons for this approval in the preamble to the direct final rule. If EPA receives no relevant adverse comments, the EPA will not take further action on this proposed rule. If the EPA receives relevant adverse comment, EPA will withdraw the direct final rule and it will not take effect. The EPA will address all public comments in a subsequent final rule based upon this proposed rule. The EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action. Any parties interested in commenting must do so at this time. Please note that if we receive significant adverse comments on an amendment, paragraph or section of this rule and if that provision is independent of the remainder of the rule, we may adopt as final those provisions of the rule that are not the subject of an adverse comment.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.