Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana, 19035-19036 [05-7328]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 69 / Tuesday, April 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52 Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Carbon monoxide, Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter, Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds. Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: April 1, 2005. A. Stanley Meiburg, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. [FR Doc. 05–7333 Filed 4–11–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY 40 CFR Part 52 [R05–OAR–2005–IN–0001; FRL–7894–9] Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Proposed rule. AGENCY: SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve revisions to volatile organic compound (VOC) requirements for Transwheel Corporation (Transwheel) of Huntington County, Indiana. Transwheel owns and operates an aluminum wheel reprocessing plant at which it performs cold cleaner degreasing operations. On December 22, 2004, the Indiana Department of Environmental Management (IDEM) submitted a Commissioner’s Order containing the revised requirements, and requested that EPA approve it as an amendment to the Indiana State Implementation Plan (SIP). The December 22, 2004, submission supplements a November 8, 2001, submission. IDEM is seeking EPA approval of an ‘‘equivalent control device’’ for Transwheel’s degreasing operations, under 326 Indiana Administrative Code (IAC) 8–3–5 (a)(5)(C). Written comments must be received on or before May 12, 2005. ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by Regional Material in EDocket (RME) ID No. R05–OAR–2005– IN–0001 by one of the following methods: Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the on-line instructions for submitting comments. Agency Website: https:// docket.epa.gov/rmepub/. RME, EPA’s electronic public docket and comment system, is EPA’s preferred method for receiving comments. Once in the DATES: VerDate jul<14>2003 16:24 Apr 11, 2005 Jkt 205001 system, select ‘‘quick search,’’ then key in the appropriate RME Docket identification number. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. E-mail: mooney.john@epa.gov. Fax: (312) 886–5824. Mail: You may send written comments to: John Mooney, Chief, Criteria Pollutant Section, (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Hand delivery: Deliver your comments to: John Mooney, Chief, Criteria Pollutant Section (AR–18J), U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 18th floor, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Such deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office’s normal hours of operation. The Regional Office’s official hours of business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. excluding Federal holidays. Instructions: Direct your comments to RME ID No. R05–OAR–2005–IN–0001. EPA’s policy is that all comments received willbe included in the public docket without change, including any personal information provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through RME, regulations.gov, or e-mail. The EPA RME website and the federal regulations.gov website are ‘‘anonymous access’’ systems, which means EPA will not know your identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without going through RME or regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any disk or CD–ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of any defects or viruses. For additional instructions on submitting comments, go to Section I of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of this document. Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the RME PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 19035 index at https://www.epa.gov/rmepub/ index.jsp. Although listed in the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Publicly available docket materials are available either electronically in RME or in hard copy at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, Air and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604. Please telephone Matt Rau at (312) 886– 6524 before visiting the Region 5 Office. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt Rau, Environmental Engineer, Criteria Pollutant Section, Air Programs Branch (AR–18J), U.S. EPA, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 886–6524. Rau.matthew@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. General Information A. Does This Action Apply to Me? B. What Should I Consider As I Prepare My Comments for EPA? II. What Action Is EPA Taking Today? III. Where Can I Find More Information About This Proposal and the Corresponding Direct Final Rule? I. General Information A. Does This Action Apply to Me? This action applies to a single source, Transwheel Corporation in Huntington County, Indiana. B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA? 1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit CBI to EPA through RME, regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or CD ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2. 2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments. When submitting comments, remember to: a. Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other identifying information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number). b. Follow directions—The agency may ask you to respond to specific questions or organize comments by referencing a E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM 12APP1 19036 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 69 / Tuesday, April 12, 2005 / Proposed Rules Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number. c. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and substitute language for your requested changes. d. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information and/ or data that you used. e. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be reproduced. f. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and suggest alternatives. g. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of profanity or personal threats. h. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline identified. II. What Action Is EPA Taking Today? The EPA is proposing to approve revisions to Indiana’s VOC SIP for Transwheel. The company has requested that it be permitted to use an oil cover as an equivalent control device for its cold cleaner degreaser, under 326 IAC 8–3–5(a)(5)(C). The oil cover is a layer of mineral oil several inches thick floating over the cleaning solvent in a dip tank. The solvent is a mixture of two water miscible compounds, NMP and MEA. The oil cover controls VOC emissions from the dip tank by reducing solvent evaporation. III. Where Can I Find More Information About This Proposal and the Corresponding Direct Final Rule? For additional information, see the Direct Final Rule which is located in the Rules section of this Federal Register. Copies of the request and the EPA’s analysis are available electronically at RME or in hard copy at the above address. Please telephone Matt Rau at (312) 886–6524 before visiting the Region 5 Office. Dated: March 1, 2005. Norman Niedergang, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5. [FR Doc. 05–7328 Filed 4–11–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE 48 CFR Part 204 [DFARS Case 2003–D082] Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement; Uniform Contract Line Item Numbering AGENCY: Department of Defense (DoD). VerDate jul<14>2003 16:24 Apr 11, 2005 Jkt 205001 Proposed rule with request for comments. ACTION: SUMMARY: DoD is proposing to amend the Defense Federal Acquisition Regulation Supplement (DFARS) to update text addressing uniform line item numbering in DoD contracts. This proposed rule is a result of a transformation initiative undertaken by DoD to dramatically change the purpose and content of the DFARS. DATES: Comments on the proposed rule should be submitted in writing to the address shown below on or before June 13, 2005, to be considered in the formation of the final rule. ADDRESSES: You may submit comments, identified by DFARS Case 2003–D082, using any of the following methods: » Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. » Defense Acquisition Regulations Web Site: https://emissary.acq.osd.mil/ dar/dfars.nsf/pubcomm. Follow the instructions for submitting comments. » E-mail: dfars@osd.mil. Include DFARS Case 2003–D082 in the subject line of the message. » Fax: (703) 602–0350. » Mail: Defense Acquisition Regulations Council, Attn: Ms. Debbie Tronic, OUSD (AT&L) DPAP (DAR), IMD 3C132, 3062 Defense Pentagon, Washington, DC 20301–3062. » Hand Delivery/Courier: Defense Acquisition Regulations Council, Crystal Square 4, Suite 200A, 241 18th Street, Arlington, VA 22202–3402. All comments received will be posted to https://emissary.acq.osd.mil/dar/ dfars.nsf. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Debbie Tronic, (703) 602–0289. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: A. Background DFARS Transformation is a major DoD initiative to dramatically change the purpose and content of the DFARS. The objective is to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of the acquisition process, while allowing the acquisition workforce the flexibility to innovate. The transformed DFARS will contain only requirements of law, DoDwide policies, delegations of FAR authorities, deviations from FAR requirements, and policies/procedures that have a significant effect beyond the internal operating procedures of DoD or a significant cost or administrative impact on contractors or offerors. Additional information on the DFARS Transformation initiative is available at https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dfars/ transf.htm. PO 00000 Frm 00025 Fmt 4702 Sfmt 4702 This proposed rule is a result of the DFARS Transformation initiative. The proposed changes— » Eliminate certain exceptions to requirements for uniform contract line item numbering at DFARS 204.7102, to promote standardization in contract writing; and » Delete procedures for use and numbering of contract exhibits and attachments at DFARS 204.7105. This text will be relocated to the new DFARS companion resource, Procedures, Guidance, and Information, available at https://www.acq.osd.mil/dpap/dars/pgi. This rule was not subject to Office of Management and Budget review under Executive Order 12866, dated September 30, 1993. B. Regulatory Flexibility Act DoD does not expect this rule to have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities within the meaning of the Regulatory Flexibility Act, 5 U.S.C. 601, et seq., because the rule pertains only to DoD administrative procedures for numbering of contract line items, exhibits, and attachments. Therefore, DoD has not performed an initial regulatory flexibility analysis. DoD invites comments from small businesses and other interested parties. DoD also will consider comments from small entities concerning the affected DFARS subpart in accordance with 5 U.S.C. 610. Such comments should be submitted separately and should cite DFARS Case 2003–D082. C. Paperwork Reduction Act The Paperwork Reduction Act does not apply because the rule does not impose any information collection requirements that require the approval of the Office of Management and Budget under 44 U.S.C. 3501, et seq. List of Subjects in 48 CFR Part 204 Government procurement. Michele P. Peterson, Editor, Defense Acquisition Regulations System. Therefore, DoD proposes to amend 48 CFR Part 204 as follows: 1. The authority citation for 48 CFR Part 204 continues to read as follows: Authority: 41 U.S.C. 421 and 48 CFR Chapter 1. PART 204—ADMINISTRATIVE MATTERS 2. Section 204.7102 is revised to read as follows: E:\FR\FM\12APP1.SGM 12APP1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 12, 2005)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 19035-19036]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-7328]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

40 CFR Part 52

[R05-OAR-2005-IN-0001; FRL-7894-9]


Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; 
Indiana

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Proposed rule.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: EPA is proposing to approve revisions to volatile organic 
compound (VOC) requirements for Transwheel Corporation (Transwheel) of 
Huntington County, Indiana. Transwheel owns and operates an aluminum 
wheel reprocessing plant at which it performs cold cleaner degreasing 
operations. On December 22, 2004, the Indiana Department of 
Environmental Management (IDEM) submitted a Commissioner's Order 
containing the revised requirements, and requested that EPA approve it 
as an amendment to the Indiana State Implementation Plan (SIP). The 
December 22, 2004, submission supplements a November 8, 2001, 
submission. IDEM is seeking EPA approval of an ``equivalent control 
device'' for Transwheel's degreasing operations, under 326 Indiana 
Administrative Code (IAC) 8-3-5 (a)(5)(C).

DATES: Written comments must be received on or before May 12, 2005.

ADDRESSES: Submit comments, identified by Regional Material in EDocket 
(RME) ID No. R05-OAR-2005-IN-0001 by one of the following methods:
    Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the 
on-line instructions for submitting comments.
    Agency Website: https://docket.epa.gov/rmepub/. RME, EPA's 
electronic public docket and comment system, is EPA's preferred method 
for receiving comments. Once in the system, select ``quick search,'' 
then key in the appropriate RME Docket identification number. Follow 
the on-line instructions for submitting comments.
    E-mail: mooney.john@epa.gov.
    Fax: (312) 886-5824.
    Mail: You may send written comments to: John Mooney, Chief, 
Criteria Pollutant Section, (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection 
Agency, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604.
    Hand delivery: Deliver your comments to: John Mooney, Chief, 
Criteria Pollutant Section (AR-18J), U.S. Environmental Protection 
Agency, Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, 18th floor, Chicago, 
Illinois 60604.
    Such deliveries are only accepted during the Regional Office's 
normal hours of operation. The Regional Office's official hours of 
business are Monday through Friday, 8:30 a.m. to 4:30 p.m. excluding 
Federal holidays.
    Instructions: Direct your comments to RME ID No. R05-OAR-2005-IN-
0001. EPA's policy is that all comments received willbe included in the 
public docket without change, including any personal information 
provided, unless the comment includes information claimed to be 
Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose 
disclosure is restricted by statute. Do not submit information that you 
consider to be CBI or otherwise protected through RME, regulations.gov, 
or e-mail. The EPA RME website and the federal regulations.gov website 
are ``anonymous access'' systems, which means EPA will not know your 
identity or contact information unless you provide it in the body of 
your comment. If you send an e-mail comment directly to EPA without 
going through RME or regulations.gov, your e-mail address will be 
automatically captured and included as part of the comment that is 
placed in the public docket and made available on the Internet. If you 
submit an electronic comment, EPA recommends that you include your name 
and other contact information in the body of your comment and with any 
disk or CD-ROM you submit. If EPA cannot read your comment due to 
technical difficulties and cannot contact you for clarification, EPA 
may not be able to consider your comment. Electronic files should avoid 
the use of special characters, any form of encryption, and be free of 
any defects or viruses. For additional instructions on submitting 
comments, go to Section I of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION section of 
this document.
    Docket: All documents in the electronic docket are listed in the 
RME index at https://www.epa.gov/rmepub/index.jsp. Although listed in 
the index, some information is not publicly available, i.e., CBI or 
other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. Publicly 
available docket materials are available either electronically in RME 
or in hard copy at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 5, 
Air and Radiation Division, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, 
Illinois 60604. Please telephone Matt Rau at (312) 886-6524 before 
visiting the Region 5 Office.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Matt Rau, Environmental Engineer, 
Criteria Pollutant Section, Air Programs Branch (AR-18J), U.S. EPA, 
Region 5, 77 West Jackson Boulevard, Chicago, Illinois 60604, (312) 
886-6524. Rau.matthew@epa.gov.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

I. General Information
    A. Does This Action Apply to Me?
    B. What Should I Consider As I Prepare My Comments for EPA?
II. What Action Is EPA Taking Today?
III. Where Can I Find More Information About This Proposal and the 
Corresponding Direct Final Rule?

I. General Information

A. Does This Action Apply to Me?

    This action applies to a single source, Transwheel Corporation in 
Huntington County, Indiana.

B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA?

    1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit CBI to EPA through RME, 
regulations.gov or e-mail. Clearly mark the part or all of the 
information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or 
CD ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD ROM as 
CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD ROM the 
specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one 
complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as 
CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information 
claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. 
Information so marked will not be disclosed except in accordance with 
procedures set forth in 40 CFR part 2.
    2. Tips for Preparing Your Comments. When submitting comments, 
remember to:
    a. Identify the rulemaking by docket number and other identifying 
information (subject heading, Federal Register date and page number).
    b. Follow directions--The agency may ask you to respond to specific 
questions or organize comments by referencing a

[[Page 19036]]

Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) part or section number.
    c. Explain why you agree or disagree; suggest alternatives and 
substitute language for your requested changes.
    d. Describe any assumptions and provide any technical information 
and/or data that you used.
    e. If you estimate potential costs or burdens, explain how you 
arrived at your estimate in sufficient detail to allow for it to be 
reproduced.
    f. Provide specific examples to illustrate your concerns, and 
suggest alternatives.
    g. Explain your views as clearly as possible, avoiding the use of 
profanity or personal threats.
    h. Make sure to submit your comments by the comment period deadline 
identified.

II. What Action Is EPA Taking Today?

    The EPA is proposing to approve revisions to Indiana's VOC SIP for 
Transwheel. The company has requested that it be permitted to use an 
oil cover as an equivalent control device for its cold cleaner 
degreaser, under 326 IAC 8-3-5(a)(5)(C). The oil cover is a layer of 
mineral oil several inches thick floating over the cleaning solvent in 
a dip tank. The solvent is a mixture of two water miscible compounds, 
NMP and MEA. The oil cover controls VOC emissions from the dip tank by 
reducing solvent evaporation.

III. Where Can I Find More Information About This Proposal and the 
Corresponding Direct Final Rule?

    For additional information, see the Direct Final Rule which is 
located in the Rules section of this Federal Register. Copies of the 
request and the EPA's analysis are available electronically at RME or 
in hard copy at the above address. Please telephone Matt Rau at (312) 
886-6524 before visiting the Region 5 Office.

    Dated: March 1, 2005.
Norman Niedergang,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 5.
[FR Doc. 05-7328 Filed 4-11-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.