Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Texas; 15% Rate-of-Progress Plan and Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets, Dallas/Fort Worth Ozone Nonattainment Area, 18993-18995 [05-7305]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
18993
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 69 / Tuesday, April 12, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the
absence of a prior existing requirement
for the State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This rule does
not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as added by
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule
may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a
rule report, which includes a copy of
the rule, to each House of the Congress
and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S.
House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. section 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by June 13, 2005.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this rule for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Carbon monoxide,
Incorporation by reference, Nitrogen
dioxide, Ozone, Particulate matter,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Sulfur oxides, Volatile
organic compounds.
Dated: March 28, 2005.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
I Part 52 of chapter I, title 40, Code of
Federal Regulations, is amended as
follows:
PART 52—[AMENDED]
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart L—Georgia
2. Section 52.570(c), is amended by
revising entry for: ‘‘391–3–20’’ to read as
follows:
I
§ 52.570
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
EPA APPROVED GEORGIA REGULATIONS
State citation
Title/subject
State
effective
date
*
391–3–20 ..........
*
*
*
Enhanced Inspection and Maintenance .....................................
*
12/25/2003
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
[FR Doc. 05–7308 Filed 4–11–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[TX–80–1–7353; FRL—7897–7]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Texas; 15%
Rate-of-Progress Plan and Motor
Vehicle Emissions Budgets, Dallas/
Fort Worth Ozone Nonattainment Area
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State
Implementation Plan (SIP) revision for
the State of Texas for the 15% Rate-ofProgress Plan (ROP) and 15% ROP
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:58 Apr 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
*
Frm 00033
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
4/12/05 [Insert first page
number of publication].
*
Motor Vehicle Emissions Budget
(MVEB) for the Dallas/Fort Worth
(DFW) ozone nonattainment area. This
plan shows planned emission
reductions required by the Clean Air
Act (Act) from 1990 to 1996 to improve
air quality in the Dallas/Fort Worth
Area. The reductions are from the 1990
base year emissions inventory. The
MVEBs are used for determining
conformity of transportation projects to
the SIP. This action satisfies the Act’s
requirements for an ozone
nonattainment area’s 15% Rate-ofProgress Plan and approves the MVEBs
under the ROP Plan.
DATES: This rule is effective on May 12,
2005.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the documents
relevant to this action are in the official
file which is available at the Air
Planning Section (6PD–L),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1445
Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas
PO 00000
EPA approval date
*
Explanation
*
*
75202–2733. The file will be made
available by appointment for public
inspection in the Region 6 FOIA Review
Room between the hours of 8:30 am and
4:30 pm weekdays except for legal
holidays. Contact the person listed in
the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
paragraph below to make an
appointment. If possible, please make
the appointment at least two working
days in advance of your visit. There will
be a 15 cent per page fee for making
photocopies of documents. On the day
of the visit, please check in at the EPA
Region 6 reception area at 1445 Ross
Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas.
Copies of any State submittals and
EPA’s technical support document are
also available for public inspection at
the State Air Agency listed below
during official business hours by
appointment:
Texas Commission on Environmental
Quality, Office of Air Quality, 12124
Park 35 Circle, Austin, Texas 78753.
E:\FR\FM\12APR1.SGM
12APR1
18994
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 69 / Tuesday, April 12, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Herbert R. Sherrow, Jr., Air Planning
Section (6PD–L), Environmental
Protection Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross
Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202–
2733, telephone (214) 665–7237; fax
number 214–665–7263; e-mail address
sherrow.herb@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document wherever
‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us,’’ or ‘‘our’’ is used, we mean
the EPA.
Outline
I. What Action Is EPA Taking?
II. What Is the Background for This Action?
III. What Comments Were Received During
the Public Comment Period, January 18,
2001, to March 19, 2001?
IV. Final Action
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
1. What Action Is EPA Taking?
EPA is taking full approval action on
the 15% ROP plan for the DFW ozone
nonattainment area, submitted by Texas
on August 8, 1996, since we have now
finalized approval of the State’s motor
vehicle Inspection/Maintenance (I/M)
program for the DFW area. We are also
taking final action on the Motor Vehicle
Emissions Budget (MVEB) contained in
the 15% ROP Plan.
II. What Is the Background for This
Action?
We proposed full approval of the 15%
ROP plan on January 28, 2001. The Plan
was submitted on August 8, 1996. The
Plan was given conditional, interim
approval on November 10, 1998,
pending corrections to the DFW I/M
program (63 FR 62943). It was given
conditional, interim approval because it
relied on emissions reductions from the
I/M program that received conditional,
interim approval.
For further information on the I/M
conditional, interim approval, see 62 FR
37138, published on July 11, 1997. We
found later that the State met the
conditions of the conditional approval.
We removed the conditions and granted
Texas a final interim approval of the
I/M program on April 23, 1999. See, 64
FR 19910.
Texas then submitted significant
revisions to the I/M program for the
DFW area. The revisions expanded the
program from the 2 core nonattainment
counties to the 4 counties in the
nonattainment area plus 5 additional
counties and upgraded the stringency of
the program. As a result of these
improvements in the I/M program, we
took final approval action on the I/M
program on November 14, 2001, (66 FR
57261).
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:58 Apr 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
We indicated in the proposed full
approval of the DFW 15% plan that the
plan would not be finalized until final
action on the I/M program was
complete. Therefore, because we have
completed final action on the I/M
program, we can now take final action
on the 15% ROP Plan and the associated
MVEB.
The MVEB in the plan is for Volatile
Organic Compounds (VOC). The VOC
budget is 165.49 tons per day for 1996.
There is no requirement for a Nitrogen
Oxides (NOX) budget in the 15% plans.
We have received no new information
that would change the approvability of
the ROP target calculations and none of
the credits relied upon for meeting the
ROP targets have changed since our
proposal date. Therefore, this plan
meets the Reasonable Further Progress
requirements of the Act (section
182(b)(1)).
Please refer to 66 FR 4764, January 18,
2001, and its technical support
document (TSD) for additional details
on the 15% Plan, as well as the TSD for
the November 1998 proposal action.
III. What Comments Were Received
During the Public Comment Period,
January 18, 2001, to March 19, 2001?
We did not receive any comments on
the 15% ROP Plan or the associated
MVEB.
IV. Final Action
EPA is approving the 15% Rate of
Progress plan and the Motor Vehicle
Emissions Budgets submitted by Texas
on August 8, 1996, for the DFW ozone
nonattainment area. The VOC MVEB for
the ROP plan is 165.49 tons per day for
1996.
V. Statutory and Executive Order
Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR
51735, October 4, 1993), this action is
not a ‘‘significant regulatory action’’ and
therefore is not subject to review by the
Office of Management and Budget. For
this reason, this action is also not
subject to Executive Order 13211,
‘‘Actions Concerning Regulations That
Significantly Affect Energy Supply,
Distribution, or Use’’ (66 FR 28355, May
22, 2001). This action merely approves
state law as meeting Federal
requirements and imposes no additional
requirements beyond those imposed by
state law. Accordingly, the
Administrator certifies that this rule
will not have a significant economic
impact on a substantial number of small
entities under the Regulatory Flexibility
Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because this
rule approves pre-existing requirements
under state law and does not impose
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
any additional enforceable duty beyond
that required by state law, it does not
contain any unfunded mandate or
significantly or uniquely affect small
governments, as described in the
Unfunded Mandates Reform Act of 1995
(Public Law 104–4).
This rule also does not have tribal
implications because it will not have a
substantial direct effect on one or more
Indian tribes, on the relationship
between the Federal Government and
Indian tribes, or on the distribution of
power and responsibilities between the
Federal Government and Indian tribes,
as specified by Executive Order 13175
(65 FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This
action also does not have federalism
implications because it does not have
substantial direct effects on the States,
on the relationship between the
National Government and the States, or
on the distribution of power and
responsibilities among the various
levels of government, as specified in
Executive Order 13132 (64 FR 43255,
August 10, 1999). This action merely
approves a state rule implementing a
Federal standard, and does not alter the
relationship or the distribution of power
and responsibilities established in the
Clean Air Act. This rule also is not
subject to Executive Order 13045
‘‘Protection of Children from
Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks’’ (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997),
because it is not economically
significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA’s
role is to approve state choices,
provided that they meet the criteria of
the Clean Air Act. In this context, in the
absence of a prior existing requirement
for the State to use voluntary consensus
standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for
failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for
EPA, when it reviews a SIP submission,
to use VCS in place of a SIP submission
that otherwise satisfies the provisions of
the Clean Air Act. Thus, the
requirements of section 12(d) of the
National Technology Transfer and
Advancement Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C.
272 note) do not apply. This rule does
not impose an information collection
burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5
U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as added by
the Small Business Regulatory
Enforcement Fairness Act of 1996,
generally provides that before a rule
may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a
rule report, which includes a copy of
the rule, to each House of the Congress
E:\FR\FM\12APR1.SGM
12APR1
18995
Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 69 / Tuesday, April 12, 2005 / Rules and Regulations
and to the Comptroller General of the
United States. EPA will submit a report
containing this rule and other required
information to the U.S. Senate, the U.S.
House of Representatives, and the
Comptroller General of the United
States prior to publication of the rule in
the Federal Register. A major rule
cannot take effect until 60 days after it
is published in the Federal Register.
This action is not a ‘‘major rule’’ as
defined by 5 U.S.C. section 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean
Air Act, petitions for judicial review of
this action must be filed in the United
States Court of Appeals for the
appropriate circuit by June 13, 2005.
Filing a petition for reconsideration by
the Administrator of this final rule does
not affect the finality of this rule for the
purposes of judicial review nor does it
extend the time within which a petition
for judicial review may be filed, and
shall not postpone the effectiveness of
such rule or action. This action may not
be challenged later in proceedings to
enforce its requirements. (See section
307(b)(2).)
PART 52—[AMENDED]
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air
pollution control, Hydrocarbons,
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen
oxides, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile
organic compounds.
I
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart SS—Texas
2. In § 52.2270, the table in paragraph
(e) entitled ‘‘EPA approved
nonregulatory provisions and quasiregulatory measures’’ is amended by
adding one new entry to the end of the
table to read as follows:
§ 52.2270
Dated: April 1, 2005.
Richard E. Greene,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
I
1. The authority citation for part 52
continues to read as follows:
I
*
Identification of plan.
*
*
(e) * * *
*
*
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
EPA APPROVED NONREGULATORY PROVISIONS AND QUASI-REGULATORY MEASURES IN THE TEXAS SIP
Name of SIP Provision
Applicable geographic or nonattainment area
*
*
Approval of the 15% Rate of Progress
Plan and the Motor Vehicle Emissions Budget.
*
*
Dallas-Fort Worth ..............................................
[FR Doc. 05–7305 Filed 4–11–05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560–50–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[R06–OAR–2005–TX–0019; FRL–7898–7]
Approval and Promulgation of
Implementation Plans; Texas; Agreed
Orders in the Beaumont/Port Arthur
Ozone Nonattainment Area
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Direct final rule.
AGENCY:
SUMMARY: The EPA is taking direct final
action on revisions to the Texas State
Implementation Plan (SIP). This rule
making covers eight Agreed Orders with
six companies in the Beaumont/Port
Arthur (B/PA) nonattainment area. We
are approving the eight Agreed Orders
between the State of Texas and six
companies in Southeast Texas as a
strengthening of the Texas SIP. These
Agreed Orders will contribute to the
improvement in air quality in the B/PA
nonattainment area and continue to
contribute to the maintenance of the
ozone standard in the southeastern
portion of the State of Texas. The EPA
VerDate jul<14>2003
16:58 Apr 11, 2005
Jkt 205001
State
approval/
submittal
date
*
9/8/1996
is approving this SIP revision in
accordance with the requirements of the
Federal Clean Air Act (the Act), sections
110 and 116.
DATES: This rule is effective on June 13,
2005 without further notice, unless EPA
receives relevant adverse comment by
May 12, 2005. If EPA receives such
comment, EPA will publish a timely
withdrawal in the Federal Register
informing the public that this rule will
not take effect.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Regional Material in
EDocket (RME) ID No. R06–OAR–2005–
TX–0019, by one of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: https://
www.regulations.gov Follow the on-line
instructions for submitting comments.
• Agency Web site: https://
docket.epa.gov/rmepub/ Regional
Material in EDocket (RME), EPA’s
electronic public docket and comment
system, is EPA’s preferred method for
receiving comments. Once in the
system, select ‘‘quick search,’’ then key
in the appropriate RME Docket
identification number. Follow the online instructions for submitting
comments.
• U.S. EPA Region 6 ‘‘Contact Us’’
web site: https://epa.gov/region6/
r6coment.htm Please click on ‘‘6PD’’
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
EPA approval date
*
4/12/2005 [Insert FR page
number where document begins].
Comments
*
(Multimedia) and select ‘‘Air’’ before
submitting comments.
• E-mail: Mr Thomas Diggs at
diggs.thomas@epa.gov. Please also cc
the person listed in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section below.
• Fax: Mr. Thomas Diggs, Chief, Air
Planning Section (6PD–L), at fax
number 214–665–7263.
• Mail: Mr. Thomas Diggs, Chief, Air
Planning Section (6PD–L),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1445
Ross Avenue, Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas
75202–2733.
• Hand or Courier Delivery: Mr.
Thomas Diggs, Chief, Air Planning
Section (6PD–L), Environmental
Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 1200, Dallas, Texas 75202–2733.
Such deliveries are accepted only
between the hours of 8 am and 4 pm
weekdays except for legal holidays.
Special arrangements should be made
for deliveries of boxed information.
Instructions: Direct your comments to
Regional Material in EDocket (RME) ID
No. R06–OAR–2005–TX–0019. EPA’s
policy is that all comments received
will be included in the public file
without change and may be made
available online at https://
docket.epa.gov/rmepub/, including any
personal information provided, unless
the comment includes information
E:\FR\FM\12APR1.SGM
12APR1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 69 (Tuesday, April 12, 2005)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 18993-18995]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-7305]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[TX-80-1-7353; FRL--7897-7]
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Texas; 15%
Rate-of-Progress Plan and Motor Vehicle Emissions Budgets, Dallas/Fort
Worth Ozone Nonattainment Area
AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Final rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: EPA is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision
for the State of Texas for the 15% Rate-of-Progress Plan (ROP) and 15%
ROP Motor Vehicle Emissions Budget (MVEB) for the Dallas/Fort Worth
(DFW) ozone nonattainment area. This plan shows planned emission
reductions required by the Clean Air Act (Act) from 1990 to 1996 to
improve air quality in the Dallas/Fort Worth Area. The reductions are
from the 1990 base year emissions inventory. The MVEBs are used for
determining conformity of transportation projects to the SIP. This
action satisfies the Act's requirements for an ozone nonattainment
area's 15% Rate-of-Progress Plan and approves the MVEBs under the ROP
Plan.
DATES: This rule is effective on May 12, 2005.
ADDRESSES: Copies of the documents relevant to this action are in the
official file which is available at the Air Planning Section (6PD-L),
Environmental Protection Agency, 1445 Ross Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas,
Texas 75202-2733. The file will be made available by appointment for
public inspection in the Region 6 FOIA Review Room between the hours of
8:30 am and 4:30 pm weekdays except for legal holidays. Contact the
person listed in the FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT paragraph below to
make an appointment. If possible, please make the appointment at least
two working days in advance of your visit. There will be a 15 cent per
page fee for making photocopies of documents. On the day of the visit,
please check in at the EPA Region 6 reception area at 1445 Ross Avenue,
Suite 700, Dallas, Texas.
Copies of any State submittals and EPA's technical support document
are also available for public inspection at the State Air Agency listed
below during official business hours by appointment:
Texas Commission on Environmental Quality, Office of Air Quality,
12124 Park 35 Circle, Austin, Texas 78753.
[[Page 18994]]
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Herbert R. Sherrow, Jr., Air Planning
Section (6PD-L), Environmental Protection Agency, Region 6, 1445 Ross
Avenue, Suite 700, Dallas, Texas 75202-2733, telephone (214) 665-7237;
fax number 214-665-7263; e-mail address sherrow.herb@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document wherever ``we,''
``us,'' or ``our'' is used, we mean the EPA.
Outline
I. What Action Is EPA Taking?
II. What Is the Background for This Action?
III. What Comments Were Received During the Public Comment Period,
January 18, 2001, to March 19, 2001?
IV. Final Action
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
1. What Action Is EPA Taking?
EPA is taking full approval action on the 15% ROP plan for the DFW
ozone nonattainment area, submitted by Texas on August 8, 1996, since
we have now finalized approval of the State's motor vehicle Inspection/
Maintenance (I/M) program for the DFW area. We are also taking final
action on the Motor Vehicle Emissions Budget (MVEB) contained in the
15% ROP Plan.
II. What Is the Background for This Action?
We proposed full approval of the 15% ROP plan on January 28, 2001.
The Plan was submitted on August 8, 1996. The Plan was given
conditional, interim approval on November 10, 1998, pending corrections
to the DFW I/M program (63 FR 62943). It was given conditional, interim
approval because it relied on emissions reductions from the I/M program
that received conditional, interim approval.
For further information on the I/M conditional, interim approval,
see 62 FR 37138, published on July 11, 1997. We found later that the
State met the conditions of the conditional approval. We removed the
conditions and granted Texas a final interim approval of the I/M
program on April 23, 1999. See, 64 FR 19910.
Texas then submitted significant revisions to the I/M program for
the DFW area. The revisions expanded the program from the 2 core
nonattainment counties to the 4 counties in the nonattainment area plus
5 additional counties and upgraded the stringency of the program. As a
result of these improvements in the I/M program, we took final approval
action on the I/M program on November 14, 2001, (66 FR 57261).
We indicated in the proposed full approval of the DFW 15% plan that
the plan would not be finalized until final action on the I/M program
was complete. Therefore, because we have completed final action on the
I/M program, we can now take final action on the 15% ROP Plan and the
associated MVEB.
The MVEB in the plan is for Volatile Organic Compounds (VOC). The
VOC budget is 165.49 tons per day for 1996. There is no requirement for
a Nitrogen Oxides (NOX) budget in the 15% plans.
We have received no new information that would change the
approvability of the ROP target calculations and none of the credits
relied upon for meeting the ROP targets have changed since our proposal
date. Therefore, this plan meets the Reasonable Further Progress
requirements of the Act (section 182(b)(1)).
Please refer to 66 FR 4764, January 18, 2001, and its technical
support document (TSD) for additional details on the 15% Plan, as well
as the TSD for the November 1998 proposal action.
III. What Comments Were Received During the Public Comment Period,
January 18, 2001, to March 19, 2001?
We did not receive any comments on the 15% ROP Plan or the
associated MVEB.
IV. Final Action
EPA is approving the 15% Rate of Progress plan and the Motor
Vehicle Emissions Budgets submitted by Texas on August 8, 1996, for the
DFW ozone nonattainment area. The VOC MVEB for the ROP plan is 165.49
tons per day for 1996.
V. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
Under Executive Order 12866 (58 FR 51735, October 4, 1993), this
action is not a ``significant regulatory action'' and therefore is not
subject to review by the Office of Management and Budget. For this
reason, this action is also not subject to Executive Order 13211,
``Actions Concerning Regulations That Significantly Affect Energy
Supply, Distribution, or Use'' (66 FR 28355, May 22, 2001). This action
merely approves state law as meeting Federal requirements and imposes
no additional requirements beyond those imposed by state law.
Accordingly, the Administrator certifies that this rule will not have a
significant economic impact on a substantial number of small entities
under the Regulatory Flexibility Act (5 U.S.C. 601 et seq.). Because
this rule approves pre-existing requirements under state law and does
not impose any additional enforceable duty beyond that required by
state law, it does not contain any unfunded mandate or significantly or
uniquely affect small governments, as described in the Unfunded
Mandates Reform Act of 1995 (Public Law 104-4).
This rule also does not have tribal implications because it will
not have a substantial direct effect on one or more Indian tribes, on
the relationship between the Federal Government and Indian tribes, or
on the distribution of power and responsibilities between the Federal
Government and Indian tribes, as specified by Executive Order 13175 (65
FR 67249, November 9, 2000). This action also does not have federalism
implications because it does not have substantial direct effects on the
States, on the relationship between the National Government and the
States, or on the distribution of power and responsibilities among the
various levels of government, as specified in Executive Order 13132 (64
FR 43255, August 10, 1999). This action merely approves a state rule
implementing a Federal standard, and does not alter the relationship or
the distribution of power and responsibilities established in the Clean
Air Act. This rule also is not subject to Executive Order 13045
``Protection of Children from Environmental Health Risks and Safety
Risks'' (62 FR 19885, April 23, 1997), because it is not economically
significant.
In reviewing SIP submissions, EPA's role is to approve state
choices, provided that they meet the criteria of the Clean Air Act. In
this context, in the absence of a prior existing requirement for the
State to use voluntary consensus standards (VCS), EPA has no authority
to disapprove a SIP submission for failure to use VCS. It would thus be
inconsistent with applicable law for EPA, when it reviews a SIP
submission, to use VCS in place of a SIP submission that otherwise
satisfies the provisions of the Clean Air Act. Thus, the requirements
of section 12(d) of the National Technology Transfer and Advancement
Act of 1995 (15 U.S.C. 272 note) do not apply. This rule does not
impose an information collection burden under the provisions of the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
The Congressional Review Act, 5 U.S.C. section 801 et seq., as
added by the Small Business Regulatory Enforcement Fairness Act of
1996, generally provides that before a rule may take effect, the agency
promulgating the rule must submit a rule report, which includes a copy
of the rule, to each House of the Congress
[[Page 18995]]
and to the Comptroller General of the United States. EPA will submit a
report containing this rule and other required information to the U.S.
Senate, the U.S. House of Representatives, and the Comptroller General
of the United States prior to publication of the rule in the Federal
Register. A major rule cannot take effect until 60 days after it is
published in the Federal Register. This action is not a ``major rule''
as defined by 5 U.S.C. section 804(2).
Under section 307(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act, petitions for
judicial review of this action must be filed in the United States Court
of Appeals for the appropriate circuit by June 13, 2005. Filing a
petition for reconsideration by the Administrator of this final rule
does not affect the finality of this rule for the purposes of judicial
review nor does it extend the time within which a petition for judicial
review may be filed, and shall not postpone the effectiveness of such
rule or action. This action may not be challenged later in proceedings
to enforce its requirements. (See section 307(b)(2).)
List of Subjects in 40 CFR Part 52
Environmental protection, Air pollution control, Hydrocarbons,
Intergovernmental relations, Nitrogen oxides, Ozone, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Volatile organic compounds.
Dated: April 1, 2005.
Richard E. Greene,
Regional Administrator, Region 6.
0
40 CFR part 52 is amended as follows:
PART 52--[AMENDED]
0
1. The authority citation for part 52 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.
Subpart SS--Texas
0
2. In Sec. 52.2270, the table in paragraph (e) entitled ``EPA approved
nonregulatory provisions and quasi-regulatory measures'' is amended by
adding one new entry to the end of the table to read as follows:
Sec. 52.2270 Identification of plan.
* * * * *
(e) * * *
EPA Approved Nonregulatory Provisions and Quasi-regulatory Measures in the Texas SIP
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
State
Applicable approval/
Name of SIP Provision geographic or submittal EPA approval date Comments
nonattainment area date
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
Approval of the 15% Rate of Dallas-Fort Worth... 9/8/1996 4/12/2005 [Insert FR page number
Progress Plan and the Motor where document begins].
Vehicle Emissions Budget.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
[FR Doc. 05-7305 Filed 4-11-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
