Department of Energy June 5, 2020 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents
Results 1 - 13 of 13
Record of Decision for Disposition of Depleted Uranium Oxide Conversion Product Generated From Department of Energy's Inventory of Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride
The U.S. Department of Energy's (DOE) Office of Environmental Management (EM) is announcing its decision to implement its Preferred Alternative, as documented in the Final Supplemental Environmental Impact Statement for Disposition of Depleted Uranium Oxide Conversion Product Generated from DOE's Inventory of Depleted Uranium Hexafluoride (DOE/EIS-0359-S1; DOE/EIS-0360-S1) (Final DU Oxide SEIS). Specifically, DOE has decided to disposition depleted uranium (DU) oxide at one or more of the disposal sites evaluated in the Final DU Oxide SEIS: The EnergySolutions low-level radioactive waste (LLW) disposal facility near Clive, Utah; the Waste Control Specialists LLC (WCS) LLW disposal facility near Andrews, Texas; and the Nevada National Security Site (NNSS) LLW disposal facility in Nye County, Nevada. DOE will only ship to the selected commercial site(s) if the facility is authorized to receive DU oxide. DOE considered the potential environmental impacts of the No Action Alternative and the Action Alternatives; each alternative's ability to meet DOE's purpose and need; direct, indirect, and cumulative impacts of each alternative; and public comments on the Final DU Oxide SEIS. This ROD has been prepared in accordance with the regulations of the Council on Environmental Quality for implementing the National Environmental Policy Act of 1969 (NEPA) and DOE's NEPA Implementing Procedures.
Energy Conservation Program: Test Procedure for Commercial Prerinse Spray Valves
The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) is requesting information and data through this request for information (``RFI'') to consider whether to amend DOE's test procedures for commercial prerinse spray valves. Specifically, DOE seeks data and information pertinent to whether amended test procedures would (1) more accurately or fully comply with the requirement that the test procedure be reasonably designed to produce test results that measure water use during a representative average use cycle or period of use without being unduly burdensome to conduct, or (2) reduce test burden. DOE welcomes written comments from the public on any subject within the scope of this document (including topics not raised in this RFI), as well as the submission of data and other relevant information.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
