International Trade Administration May 10, 2007 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents

Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
Document Number: E7-9042
Type: Notice
Date: 2007-05-10
Agency: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration
On November 7, 2006, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published in the Federal Register its preliminary results in the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on carbazole violet pigment 23 (CVP 23) from the People's Republic of China (PRC) for the period June 24, 2004, through November 30, 2005. See Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Rescission in Part, 71 FR 65073 (November 7, 2006) (Preliminary Results). We invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. Based upon our analysis of the comments received, we have made changes to our margin calculation; however, the final dumping margin for Tianjin Hanchem Trading Co., Ltd. (Hanchem) does not differ from the Preliminary Results. Hanchem's final dumping margin is listed in the ``Final Results of Review'' section below.
Petroleum Wax Candles from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results and Partial Rescission of the Eighth Administrative Review
Document Number: E7-9040
Type: Notice
Date: 2007-05-10
Agency: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration
The Department of Commerce (``the Department'') is currently conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on petroleum wax candles from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'') covering the period August 1, 2005, through July 31, 2006. This review covers imports of subject merchandise from one manufacturer/exporter: Deseado International, Ltd. (``Deseado''). If these preliminary results are adopted in our final results of review, we will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries in accordance with these results. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary review results and will issue the final review results no later than 120 days from the date of publication of this notice.
Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Canada
Document Number: E7-9039
Type: Notice
Date: 2007-05-10
Agency: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration
On November 6, 2006, the Department of Commerce (``the Department'') published the preliminary results of its third administrative review of the antidumping duty order on carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from Canada. The review covers the shipments of subject merchandise to the United States by Ivaco Rolling Mills 2004 L.P. (``IRM''), and Sivaco Ontario, a division of Sivaco Wire Group 2004 L.P., (``Sivaco'') (collectively, both IRM and Sivaco are referred to as ``Ivaco'').\1\ The period of review (``POR'') is October 1, 2004, through September 30, 2005. Based on our analysis of comments received, these final results differ from the preliminary results. The final results are listed below in the Final Results of Review section.
Low Enriched Uranium From France: Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
Document Number: E7-9038
Type: Notice
Date: 2007-05-10
Agency: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration
On January 3, 2007, the Department of Commerce (the Department) initiated a sunset review of the antidumping duty order on low enriched uranium (LEU) from France pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act). On the basis of a notice of intent to participate and an adequate substantive response filed on behalf of domestic interested parties and an inadequate response from respondent interested party, the Department has conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review of this order pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) and section 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(C)(2) of the Department's regulations. As a result of this sunset review, the Department finds that revocation of the antidumping duty order is likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the level indicated in the ``Final Results of Review'' section of this notice.
Final Results of Expedited Sunset Review: Countervailing Duty Order on Low Enriched Uranium from France
Document Number: E7-9037
Type: Notice
Date: 2007-05-10
Agency: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration
On January 3, 2007, the Department of Commerce (``the Department'') initiated a sunset review of the countervailing duty (``CVD'') order on low enriched uranium (``LEU'') from France, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''). On the basis of a notice of intent to participate and an adequate substantive response filed on behalf of a domestic interested party and inadequate response from respondent interested parties (in this case, no response), the Department determined to conduct an expedited sunset review of this CVD order pursuant to section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.218(e)(1)(ii)(B). As a result of this sunset review, the Department finds that revocation of the CVD order would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of a countervailable subsidy at the level indicated in the ``Final Results of Review'' section of this notice.
Polyethylene Retail Carrier Bags from Malaysia: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
Document Number: E7-9036
Type: Notice
Date: 2007-05-10
Agency: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration
In response to a request from an interested party, the Department of Commerce (the Department) is conducting an administrative review of the antidumping duty order on polyethylene retail carrier bags (PRCBs) from Malaysia. The review covers one manufacturer/ exporter. The period of review is August 1, 2005, through July 31, 2006. We have preliminarily determined that sales have not been made below normal value by the company subject to this review. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. Parties who submit comments in this review are requested to submit with each argument a statement of each issue and a brief summary of the argument.