Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review, 26589-26591 [E7-9042]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 90 / Thursday, May 10, 2007 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Economic Development Administration [Docket No.: 070125020–7021–01] Solicitation of Applications for the University Center Economic Development Program Economic Development Administration (EDA), Department of Commerce. ACTION: Notice; re-open competitive solicitation. AGENCY: SUMMARY: The Economic Development Administration (EDA) publishes this notice to re-open the competitive solicitation for applications under the University Center Economic Development Program in EDA’s Austin and Denver regional offices. DATES: The new closing date and time for receipt of electronic and paper applications for funding under the FY 2007 University Center Economic Development Program competition is Friday, May 25, 2007 at 4 p.m. local time. Applications may be submitted in two formats: (i) In paper format at the addresses provided below; or (ii) electronically in accordance with the procedures provided on http:// www.Grants.gov. The content of the application is the same for paper submissions as it is for electronic submissions. EDA will not accept facsimile transmissions of applications. Paper Submissions: Applicants in Arkansas, Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma and Texas should submit paper submissions (via postal mail, overnight delivery or hand-delivery) to: FY 2007 University Center Program Competition, Economic Development Administration, Austin Regional Office, 504 Lavaca Street, Suite 1100, Austin, Texas 78701–4037. Applicants in Colorado, Iowa, Kansas, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota, Utah and Wyoming should submit paper submissions (via postal mail, overnight delivery or hand-delivery) to: FY 2007 University Center Program Competition, Economic Development Administration, Denver Regional Office, 1244 Speer Boulevard, Suite 670, Denver, Colorado 80204–3591. Electronic Submissions: Applicants may submit applications electronically in accordance with the instructions provided at www.Grants.gov. On http://www.grants.gov/search/basic.do, applicants can perform a ‘‘Basic Search’’ for this grant opportunity by completing the ‘‘Keyword Search;’’ the ‘‘Search by pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES ADDRESSES: VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:04 May 09, 2007 Jkt 211001 Funding Opportunity Number;’’ or the ‘‘Search by CFDA Number’’ field, and then clicking the ‘‘Search’’ button. The Funding Opportunity Number for this grant opportunity is EDA02142007 and the CFDA number is 11.303. EDA strongly encourages that applicants not wait until the application closing date to begin the application process through www.Grants.gov. The preferred file format for electronic attachments (e.g., the Project Narrative and exhibits to Form ED–900A) is portable document format (PDF); however, EDA will accept electronic files in Microsoft Word, WordPerfect, Lotus or Excel formats. Applicants should access the following link for assistance in navigating www.Grants.gov and for a list of useful resources: http:// www.grants.gov/applicants/ applicant_help.jsp. If you do not find an answer to your question under Frequently Asked Questions, try consulting the Applicant’s User Guide. If you still cannot find an answer to your question, contact www.Grants.gov via e-mail at support@grants.gov or telephone at 1.800.518.4726. The hours of operation for www.Grants.gov are Monday–Friday, 7 a.m. to 9 p.m. (EST) (except for federal holidays). For a copy of the FFO announcement for this request for applications, please see the Web site listed below under ‘‘Electronic Access.’’ FOR FURTHER INFORMATION: For additional information or for a paper copy of the FFO announcement, the designated contact person in the Austin regional office is John Christ. Mr. Christ may be reached at jchrist@eda.doc.gov or at 512.381.8145. The designated contact person in the Denver regional office is Forlesia S. Willis. Ms. Willis may be reached at fwillis@eda.doc.gov or at 303.844.5452. EDA’s Internet Web site at www.eda.gov also contains additional information on EDA and its programs, including the University Center Economic Development Program. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: On February 2, 2007, EDA published in the Federal Register (72 FR 5002) the original notice regard the FY 2007 University Center Economic Development Program competition. The original deadline for receipt of applications was May 3, 2007 at 4 p.m. local time. EDA re-opens the solicitation period to provide the public more time to submit applications. The new deadline for receipt of electronic and paper applications for funding under the FY 2007 University Center Economic Development Program competition is May 25, 2007 at 4 p.m. PO 00000 Frm 00002 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 26589 local time. All applications that are submitted between May 3, 2007 and the date of publication of this notice will be considered timely. Applicants who submitted all application materials by the original deadline (May 3, 2007 at 4 p.m. local time) may revise their applications in light of the re-opening of the competitive solicitation, but all materials must be received by the Austin or Denver regional offices (as appropriate) by May 25, 2007 at 4 p.m. local time. All other information and requirements for the FY 2007 University Center Economic Development Program competition remain as stated in the February 2, 2007 Federal Register notice (72 FR 5002). Electronic Access: The FFO announcement for the FY 2007 University Center Economic Development Program competition is available at http://www.Grants.gov. Additional information is available through EDA’s Internet Web site at http://www.eda.gov. Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance (CFDA) Number: 11.303, Economic Development—Technical Assistance. Dated: May 4, 2007. Benjamin Erulkar, Deputy Assistant Secretary of Commerce for Economic Development. [FR Doc. E7–8995 Filed 5–9–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–24–P DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE International Trade Administration [A–570–892] Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from the People’s Republic of China: Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On November 7, 2006, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published in the Federal Register its preliminary results in the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on carbazole violet pigment 23 (CVP 23) from the People’s Republic of China (PRC) for the period June 24, 2004, through November 30, 2005. See Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from the People’s Republic of China: Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Rescission in Part, 71 FR 65073 (November 7, 2006) (Preliminary Results). We invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM 10MYN1 26590 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 90 / Thursday, May 10, 2007 / Notices Based upon our analysis of the comments received, we have made changes to our margin calculation; however, the final dumping margin for Tianjin Hanchem Trading Co., Ltd. (Hanchem) does not differ from the Preliminary Results. Hanchem’s final dumping margin is listed in the ‘‘Final Results of Review’’ section below. EFFECTIVE DATE: May 10, 2007. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca Trainor or Terre Keaton, AD/ CVD Operations, Office 2, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482–4007 or (202) 482– 1280, respectively. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Background On November 7, 2006, the Department published its Preliminary Results in this administrative review. We invited interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. On November 27, 2006, the petitioners1 submitted additional surrogate value information. On December 7, 2006, the petitioners and Clariant Corporation, a domestic interested party, filed case briefs. On December 14, 2006, Hanchem filed a rebuttal brief. On January 23, 2007, we extended the final results by 60 days. See Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from the People’s Republic of China; Notice of Extension of Time Limit for Final Results, 72 FR 2855 (January 23, 2007). We have conducted this administrative review in accordance with section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 351.213. Period of Review the form of presscake and dry color. Pigment dispersions in any form (e.g., pigments dispersed in oleoresins, flammable solvents, water) are not included within the scope of this order. The merchandise subject to this order is classifiable under subheading 3204.17.9040 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and customs purposes, the written description of the scope of this order is dispositive. Analysis of Comments Received All issues raised in the post– preliminary comments by parties in this review are addressed in the memorandum from Stephen J. Claeys, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, to David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, ‘‘Issues and Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2004–2005 Administrative Review of Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from the People’s Republic of China ‘‘ dated May 3, 2007, (Issues and Decision Memorandum), which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the issues raised, all of which are in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, is attached to this notice as Appendix I. Parties can find a complete discussion of all issues raised in the briefs and the corresponding recommendations in this public memorandum, which is on file in the Central Records Unit (CRU), room B–099 of the Department of Commerce. In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum can be accessed directly on the Web at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The paper copy and electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum are identical in content. The period of review (POR) is June 24, 2004, through November 30, 2005. Changes Since the Preliminary Results Scope of Order Based on our analysis of comments received, we have made certain changes in the margin calculation. For a discussion of these changes, see the Issues and Decision Memorandum, at Comments 2 and 3. pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES The merchandise covered by this order is carbazole violet pigment 23 identified as Color Index No. 51319 and Chemical Abstract No. 6358–30–1, with the chemical name of diindolo [3,2– b:3′,2′-m] triphenodioxazine, 8,18– dichloro–5, 15–diethy–5,15–dihydro-, and molecular formula of C34H22Cl2N4O2.2 The subject merchandise includes the crude pigment in any form (e.g., dry powder, paste, wet cake) and finished pigment in 1 The petitioners are Nation Ford Chemical Company and Sun Chemical Company. 2 The bracketed section of the product description, [3,2-b:3′,2′-m], is not business proprietary information, but is part of the chemical nomenclature. VerDate Aug<31>2005 15:04 May 09, 2007 Jkt 211001 Final Results of Review The weighted–average dumping margin for the period June 24, 2004, through November 30, 2005 is as follows: Exporter/Manufacturer Weighted– Average Margin Percentage Tianjin Hanchem International Trading Co., Ltd. ................... 0.00 percent PO 00000 Frm 00003 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Assessment Rates The Department shall determine, and Customs and Border Protection (CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries, in accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b). The Department will issue assessment instructions directly to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of these final results of administrative review. Pursuant to 19 CFR 351.106(c), we will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all appropriate entries covered by this review if any importer–specific assessment rate calculated in the final results of this review is above de minimis (i.e., is not less than 0.50 percent). We calculated the importer– specific ad valorem duty assessment rate based on the ratio of the total amount of the dumping margin calculated for the examined U.S. sale to the total entered value of that sale. The Department clarified its ‘‘automatic assessment’’ regulation on May 6, 2003. See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). This clarification will apply to entries of subject merchandise during the POR produced by Hanchem included in these final results of review for which Hanchem did not know its merchandise was destined for the United States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed entries at the ‘‘All Others’’ rate if there is no rate for the intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction. Cash Deposit Requirements The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon publication of this notice of final results of administrative review for all shipments of CVP 23 from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For Hanchem, the cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for previously reviewed or investigated companies not listed above that have a separate rate, the cash deposit rate will continue to be the company–specific rate published for the most recent period; (3) the cash deposit rate for all other PRC exporters will be 241.32 percent, the current PRC–wide rate3; and (4) the cash deposit rate for 3 See The Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to United States Court of International Trade Remand Order, Goldlink Industries Co., Ltd., Trust Chem Co., Ltd., Tianjin Hanchem International Trading Co., Ltd. v. United States, Slip Op. 06-65 (May 4, 2006), confirmed by the CIT on December 8, 2006. See also Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from the People’s Republic of China: E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM 10MYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 72, No. 90 / Thursday, May 10, 2007 / Notices all non–PRC exporters that do no have their own rate will be the rate applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non–PRC exporter. These cash deposit requirements shall remain in effect until further notice. Notification to Interested Parties This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this requirement could result in the Secretary’s presumption that reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent assessment of double antidumping duties. This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to administrative protective orders (APOs) of their responsibility concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO is a violation which is subject to sanction. We are issuing and publishing these final results of review in accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 351.213. Dated: May 3, 2007. David M. Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration. Comment 1: Surrogate Value for Chloranil Comment 2: Surrogate Financial Ratios Comment 3: Surrogate Value for Triethylamine pwalker on PROD1PC71 with NOTICES Comment 4: Brokerage Fees and Terminal Charges [FR Doc. E7–9042 Filed 5–9–07; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 3510–DS–S Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony with Final Determination of Sales at Less than Fair Value, 72 FR 327 (January 4, 2007). 17:49 May 09, 2007 International Trade Administration [A–122–840] Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Canada Import Administration, International Trade Administration, Department of Commerce. SUMMARY: On November 6, 2006, the Department of Commerce (‘‘the Department’’) published the preliminary results of its third administrative review of the antidumping duty order on carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from Canada. The review covers the shipments of subject merchandise to the United States by Ivaco Rolling Mills 2004 L.P. (‘‘IRM’’), and Sivaco Ontario, a division of Sivaco Wire Group 2004 L.P., (‘‘Sivaco’’) (collectively, both IRM and Sivaco are referred to as ‘‘Ivaco’’).1 The period of review (‘‘POR’’) is October 1, 2004, through September 30, 2005. Based on our analysis of comments received, these final results differ from the preliminary results. The final results are listed below in the Final Results of Review section. EFFECTIVE DATE: May 10, 2007. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Damian Felton or Brandon Farlander, at (202) 482–0133 or (202) 482–0182, respectively; AD/CVD Operations, Office 1, Import Administration, International Trade Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street & Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: AGENCY: Background Appendix I: Issues Addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum VerDate Aug<31>2005 DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE Jkt 211001 On November 6, 2006, the Department published in the Federal Register the preliminary results of the third administrative review of the antidumping duty order on carbon and certain alloy steel wire rod from Canada. See Notice of Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Notice of Initiation of Changed Circumstances Review: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Canada, 71 FR 64921 (November 6, 2006) (‘‘Preliminary Results’’). 1 On March 30, 2007, the Department determined that Ivaco Rolling Mills 2004 L.P. was the successor-in-interest to Ivaco Rolling Mills L.P.; and Sivaco Ontario, a division of Sivaco Wire Group 2004 L.P., was the successor-in-interest to Ivaco Inc. See Notice of Final Results of Antidumping Duty Changed Circumstances Review: Carbon and Certain Alloy Steel Wire Rod from Canada, 72 FR 15102 (March 30, 2007). PO 00000 Frm 00004 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 26591 We invited parties to comment on the Preliminary Results. On December 11, 2006, we received case briefs from the respondent, Ivaco, and the petitioners, Gerdau Ameristeel US, Inc., ISG Georgetown, Inc., Keystone Consolidated Industries, Inc., and North Star Steel Texas, Inc. (herein after referred to as ‘‘the petitioners’’). Ivaco submitted its rebuttal brief on December 18, 2006. No public hearing was requested. Scope of the Order The merchandise subject to this order is certain hot–rolled products of carbon steel and alloy steel, in coils, of approximately round cross section, 5.00 mm or more, but less than 19.00 mm, in solid cross-sectional diameter. Specifically excluded are steel products possessing the above–noted physical characteristics and meeting the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (‘‘HTSUS’’) definitions for (a) stainless steel; (b) tool steel; (c) high nickel steel; (d) ball bearing steel; and (e) concrete reinforcing bars and rods. Also excluded are (f) free machining steel products (i.e., products that contain by weight one or more of the following elements: 0.03 percent or more of lead, 0.05 percent or more of bismuth, 0.08 percent or more of sulfur, more than 0.04 percent of phosphorus, more than 0.05 percent of selenium, or more than 0.01 percent of tellurium). Also excluded from the scope are 1080 grade tire cord quality wire rod and 1080 grade tire bead quality wire rod. Grade 1080 tire cord quality rod is defined as: (i) grade 1080 tire cord quality wire rod measuring 5.0 mm or more but not more than 6.0 mm in cross-sectional diameter; (ii) with an average partial decarburization of no more than 70 microns in depth (maximum individual 200 microns); (iii) having no non–deformable inclusions greater than 20 microns and no deformable inclusions greater than 35 microns; (iv) having a carbon segregation per heat average of 3.0 or better using European Method NFA 04– 114; (v) having a surface quality with no surface defects of a length greater than 0.15 mm; (vi) capable of being drawn to a diameter of 0.30 mm or less with 3 or fewer breaks per ton, and (vii) containing by weight the following elements in the proportions shown: (1) 0.78 percent or more of carbon, (2) less than 0.01 percent of aluminum, (3) 0.040 percent or less, in the aggregate, of phosphorus and sulfur, (4) 0.006 percent or less of nitrogen, and (5) not more than 0.15 percent, in the aggregate, of copper, nickel and chromium. E:\FR\FM\10MYN1.SGM 10MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 72, Number 90 (Thursday, May 10, 2007)]
[Notices]
[Pages 26589-26591]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E7-9042]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE

International Trade Administration

[A-570-892]


Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from the People's Republic of China: 
Final Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review

AGENCY: Import Administration, International Trade Administration, 
Department of Commerce.
SUMMARY: On November 7, 2006, the Department of Commerce (the 
Department) published in the Federal Register its preliminary results 
in the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on carbazole 
violet pigment 23 (CVP 23) from the People's Republic of China (PRC) 
for the period June 24, 2004, through November 30, 2005. See Carbazole 
Violet Pigment 23 from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary 
Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Rescission in 
Part, 71 FR 65073 (November 7, 2006) (Preliminary Results). We invited 
interested parties to comment on the Preliminary Results.

[[Page 26590]]

Based upon our analysis of the comments received, we have made changes 
to our margin calculation; however, the final dumping margin for 
Tianjin Hanchem Trading Co., Ltd. (Hanchem) does not differ from the 
Preliminary Results. Hanchem's final dumping margin is listed in the 
``Final Results of Review'' section below.

EFFECTIVE DATE:  May 10, 2007.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Rebecca Trainor or Terre Keaton, AD/
CVD Operations, Office 2, Import Administration, International Trade 
Administration, U.S. Department of Commerce, 14th Street and 
Constitution Avenue, NW, Washington, DC 20230; telephone: (202) 482-
4007 or (202) 482-1280, respectively.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:

Background

    On November 7, 2006, the Department published its Preliminary 
Results in this administrative review. We invited interested parties to 
comment on the Preliminary Results. On November 27, 2006, the 
petitioners\1\ submitted additional surrogate value information. On 
December 7, 2006, the petitioners and Clariant Corporation, a domestic 
interested party, filed case briefs. On December 14, 2006, Hanchem 
filed a rebuttal brief. On January 23, 2007, we extended the final 
results by 60 days. See Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from the People's 
Republic of China; Notice of Extension of Time Limit for Final Results, 
72 FR 2855 (January 23, 2007).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \1\ The petitioners are Nation Ford Chemical Company and Sun 
Chemical Company.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    We have conducted this administrative review in accordance with 
section 751 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (the Act), and 19 CFR 
351.213.

Period of Review

    The period of review (POR) is June 24, 2004, through November 30, 
2005.

Scope of Order

    The merchandise covered by this order is carbazole violet pigment 
23 identified as Color Index No. 51319 and Chemical Abstract No. 6358-
30-1, with the chemical name of diindolo [lsqb]3,2-b:3[foot],2[foot]-
m[rsqb] triphenodioxazine, 8,18-dichloro-5, 15-diethy-5,15-dihydro-, 
and molecular formula of 
C34H22Cl2N4O2.\2\
 The subject merchandise includes the crude pigment in any form (e.g., 
dry powder, paste, wet cake) and finished pigment in the form of 
presscake and dry color. Pigment dispersions in any form (e.g., 
pigments dispersed in oleoresins, flammable solvents, water) are not 
included within the scope of this order. The merchandise subject to 
this order is classifiable under subheading 3204.17.9040 of the 
Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States (HTSUS). Although the 
HTSUS subheading is provided for convenience and customs purposes, the 
written description of the scope of this order is dispositive.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \2\ The bracketed section of the product description, [lsqb]3,2-
b:3[foot],2[foot]-m[rsqb], is not business proprietary information, 
but is part of the chemical nomenclature.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Analysis of Comments Received

    All issues raised in the post-preliminary comments by parties in 
this review are addressed in the memorandum from Stephen J. Claeys, 
Deputy Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, to David M. 
Spooner, Assistant Secretary for Import Administration, ``Issues and 
Decision Memorandum for the Final Results of the 2004-2005 
Administrative Review of Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from the People's 
Republic of China `` dated May 3, 2007, (Issues and Decision 
Memorandum), which is hereby adopted by this notice. A list of the 
issues raised, all of which are in the Issues and Decision Memorandum, 
is attached to this notice as Appendix I. Parties can find a complete 
discussion of all issues raised in the briefs and the corresponding 
recommendations in this public memorandum, which is on file in the 
Central Records Unit (CRU), room B-099 of the Department of Commerce. 
In addition, a complete version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum 
can be accessed directly on the Web at http://ia.ita.doc.gov/frn. The 
paper copy and electronic version of the Issues and Decision Memorandum 
are identical in content.

Changes Since the Preliminary Results

    Based on our analysis of comments received, we have made certain 
changes in the margin calculation. For a discussion of these changes, 
see the Issues and Decision Memorandum, at Comments 2 and 3.

Final Results of Review

    The weighted-average dumping margin for the period June 24, 2004, 
through November 30, 2005 is as follows:

------------------------------------------------------------------------
                                                            Weighted-
                 Exporter/Manufacturer                    Average Margin
                                                            Percentage
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Tianjin Hanchem International Trading Co., Ltd.........   0.00 percent
------------------------------------------------------------------------

Assessment Rates

    The Department shall determine, and Customs and Border Protection 
(CBP) shall assess, antidumping duties on all appropriate entries, in 
accordance with 19 CFR 351.212(b). The Department will issue assessment 
instructions directly to CBP 15 days after the date of publication of 
these final results of administrative review. Pursuant to 19 CFR 
351.106(c), we will instruct CBP to assess antidumping duties on all 
appropriate entries covered by this review if any importer-specific 
assessment rate calculated in the final results of this review is above 
de minimis (i.e., is not less than 0.50 percent). We calculated the 
importer-specific ad valorem duty assessment rate based on the ratio of 
the total amount of the dumping margin calculated for the examined U.S. 
sale to the total entered value of that sale.
    The Department clarified its ``automatic assessment'' regulation on 
May 6, 2003. See Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Proceedings: 
Assessment of Antidumping Duties, 68 FR 23954 (May 6, 2003). This 
clarification will apply to entries of subject merchandise during the 
POR produced by Hanchem included in these final results of review for 
which Hanchem did not know its merchandise was destined for the United 
States. In such instances, we will instruct CBP to liquidate unreviewed 
entries at the ``All Others'' rate if there is no rate for the 
intermediate company(ies) involved in the transaction.

Cash Deposit Requirements

    The following cash deposit requirements will be effective upon 
publication of this notice of final results of administrative review 
for all shipments of CVP 23 from the PRC entered, or withdrawn from 
warehouse, for consumption on or after the publication date, as 
provided for by section 751(a)(2)(C) of the Act: (1) For Hanchem, the 
cash deposit rate will be zero; (2) for previously reviewed or 
investigated companies not listed above that have a separate rate, the 
cash deposit rate will continue to be the company-specific rate 
published for the most recent period; (3) the cash deposit rate for all 
other PRC exporters will be 241.32 percent, the current PRC-wide 
rate\3\; and (4) the cash deposit rate for

[[Page 26591]]

all non-PRC exporters that do no have their own rate will be the rate 
applicable to the PRC exporter that supplied that non-PRC exporter. 
These cash deposit requirements shall remain in effect until further 
notice.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

    \3\ See The Final Results of Redetermination Pursuant to United 
States Court of International Trade Remand Order, Goldlink 
Industries Co., Ltd., Trust Chem Co., Ltd., Tianjin Hanchem 
International Trading Co., Ltd. v. United States, Slip Op. 06-65 
(May 4, 2006), confirmed by the CIT on December 8, 2006. See also 
Carbazole Violet Pigment 23 from the People's Republic of China: 
Notice of Court Decision Not in Harmony with Final Determination of 
Sales at Less than Fair Value, 72 FR 327 (January 4, 2007).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------

Notification to Interested Parties

    This notice also serves as a final reminder to importers of their 
responsibility under 19 CFR 351.402(f) to file a certificate regarding 
the reimbursement of antidumping duties prior to liquidation of the 
relevant entries during this review period. Failure to comply with this 
requirement could result in the Secretary's presumption that 
reimbursement of antidumping duties occurred and the subsequent 
assessment of double antidumping duties.
    This notice also serves as a reminder to parties subject to 
administrative protective orders (APOs) of their responsibility 
concerning the return or destruction of proprietary information 
disclosed under APO in accordance with 19 CFR 351.305, which continues 
to govern business proprietary information in this segment of the 
proceeding. Timely written notification of the return/destruction of 
APO materials or conversion to judicial protective order is hereby 
requested. Failure to comply with the regulations and terms of an APO 
is a violation which is subject to sanction.
    We are issuing and publishing these final results of review in 
accordance with sections 751(a)(1) and 777(i)(1) of the Act, and 19 CFR 
351.213.

    Dated: May 3, 2007.
David M. Spooner,
Assistant Secretary for Import Administration.

Appendix I: Issues Addressed in the Issues and Decision Memorandum

Comment 1: Surrogate Value for Chloranil
Comment 2: Surrogate Financial Ratios
Comment 3: Surrogate Value for Triethylamine
Comment 4: Brokerage Fees and Terminal Charges

[FR Doc. E7-9042 Filed 5-9-07; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3510-DS-S