International Trade Administration July 6, 2006 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents

Certain Cased Pencils from the People's Republic of China; Final Results and Partial Rescission of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review
Document Number: E6-10568
Type: Notice
Date: 2006-07-06
Agency: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration
On December 28, 2005, the Department of Commerce (the Department) published in the Federal Register the preliminary results and intent to rescind in part the 2003-2004 administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain cased pencils (pencils) from the People's Republic of China (PRC). See Certain Cased Pencils from the People's Republic of China; Preliminary Results of Antidumping Duty Administrative Review and Intent to Rescind in Part, 70 FR 76755 (December 28, 2005) (``Preliminary Results''). The period of review (POR) is December 1, 2003, through November 30, 2004. We have now completed the 2003-2004 administrative review of the order. Based on comments received, we have made changes in the dumping margin calculations. Therefore, the final results differ from the preliminary results. For details regarding these changes, see the section of this notice entitled ``Changes Since the Preliminary Results.'' The final results are listed below in the ``Final Results of Review'' section.
Revocation of the Countervailing Duty Orders: Pure Magnesium and Alloy Magnesium from Canada
Document Number: E6-10567
Type: Notice
Date: 2006-07-06
Agency: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration
On July 1, 2005, the Department of Commerce (``the Department'') initiated its sunset reviews of the countervailing duty (``CVD'') orders on pure magnesium and alloy magnesium from Canada. See Initiation of Five-year (``Sunset'') Reviews, 70 FR 38101 (July 1, 2005). Pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''), the International Trade Commission (``the ITC''), in its sunset reviews, determined that revocation of the CVD orders on pure magnesium and alloy magnesium from Canada would not be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time. See Pure and Alloy Magnesium from Canada, 71 FR 36359 (June 26, 2006). Therefore, pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Act and 19 CFR 351.222(i)(1)(iii), the Department is revoking the CVD orders on pure magnesium and alloy magnesium from Canada.
Certain Frozen Warmwater Shrimp from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of the Antidumping Duty New Shipper Review
Document Number: E6-10565
Type: Notice
Date: 2006-07-06
Agency: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration
The Department of Commerce (``the Department'') is currently conducting a new shipper review of the antidumping duty order on certain frozen warmwater shrimp from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'') covering the period July 16, 2004, through July 31, 2005. The Department preliminarily determines that sales have not been made below normal value (``NV'') with respect to Zhanjiang Regal Integrated Marine Resources Co., Ltd. (``Zhanjiang Regal''), which participated fully and is entitled to a separate rate in this review. If these preliminary results are adopted in its final results of this review, the Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') to assess antidumping duties on entries of subject merchandise during the period of review (``POR'') for which the importer-specific assessment rates are above de minimis.
Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People's Republic of China: Preliminary Results of 2004-2005 Semi-Annual New Shipper Reviews and Notice of Final Rescission of One New Shipper Review
Document Number: E6-10488
Type: Notice
Date: 2006-07-06
Agency: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration
In response to requests from Shenyang Kunyu Wood Industry Co., Ltd. (``Kunyu''), Dongguan Landmark Furniture Products Ltd. (``Landmark''), Meikangchi (Nantong) Furniture Company Ltd. (``Meikangchi''), and WBE Industries (Hui-Yang) Co., Ltd. (``WBE''), the U.S. Department of Commerce (``the Department'') is conducting new shipper reviews of the antidumping duty order on wooden bedroom furniture from the People's Republic of China (``PRC''). The period of review (``POR'') is June 24, 2004, through June 30, 2005. We have preliminarily determined that sales have been made below normal value (``NV'') by Kunyu and Meikangchi. However, we have also preliminarily determined that sales have not been made below normal value by Landmark. If these preliminary results are adopted in our final results of these reviews, we will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection (``CBP'') to assess antidumping duties on entries of subject merchandise during the POR for which the importer-specific assessment rates are above de minimis. Additionally, we have rescinded the new shipper review for WBE. We invite interested parties to comment on these preliminary results. Parties who submit comments are requested to submit with each argument a statement of the issue and a brief summary of the argument. We will issue the final results no later than 90 days from the date of publication of this notice.
Stainless Steel Bar from Brazil, India, Japan, and Spain; Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Reviews of the Antidumping Duty Orders
Document Number: E6-10479
Type: Notice
Date: 2006-07-06
Agency: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration
On March 1, 2006, the Department of Commerce initiated the second sunset reviews of the antidumping duty orders on stainless steel bar from Brazil, India, Japan, and Spain pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended. On the basis of a notice of intent to participate and adequate substantive responses filed on behalf of domestic interested parties and no responses received from respondent interested parties, the Department conducted expedited (120-day) sunset reviews. See section 751(c)(3)(B) of the Act. As a result of these sunset reviews, the Department finds that revocation of the antidumping duty orders would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping at the levels listed in the ``Final Results of Reviews'' section below.