International Trade Administration June 8, 2006 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents

Low Enriched Uranium from France: Notice of Court Decision and Suspension of Liquidation
Document Number: E6-8941
Type: Notice
Date: 2006-06-08
Agency: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration
On May 18, 2006, the United States Court of International Trade (``CIT'') sustained the Department of Commerce's (``the Department's'') March 2, 2006, Final Results of Redetermination on Remand pursuant to Eurodif S.A., Compagnie Generale Des Matieres Nucleaires, and Cogema Inc., et. al. v. United States, Slip. Op. 06-3 (CIT, January 5, 2006) (``LEU Remand Redetermination''), which pertains to the Final Affirmative Countervailing Duty Determination on Low Enriched Uranium (``LEU'') from France. Consistent with the decision of the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (``Federal Circuit'') in Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (``Timken''), the Department will continue to order the suspension of liquidation of the subject merchandise, where appropriate, until there is a conclusive decision in this case. If the case is not appealed, or if it is affirmed on appeal, the Department will instruct U.S. Customs and Border Protection to liquidate all relevant entries from Eurodif S.A./Compagnie Generale Des Matieres Nucleaires (collectively, ``Eurodif'' or ``respondents'').
Fresh Garlic from the People's Republic of China: Final Results of the Expedited Sunset Review of the Antidumping Duty Order
Document Number: E6-8940
Type: Notice
Date: 2006-06-08
Agency: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration
On February 1, 2006, the Department of Commerce (``the Department'') initiated a sunset review of the antidumping duty order on fresh garlic (``garlic'') from the People's Republic of China (``PRC'') pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act''). On the basis of a notice of intent to participate and an adequate substantive response filed on behalf of domestic interested parties and inadequate response from respondent interested parties, the Department conducted an expedited (120-day) sunset review. As a result of this sunset review, the Department finds that revocation of the antidumping duty order would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping. The dumping margins are identified in the Final Results of Review section of this notice.