February 28, 2006 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents

Results 101 - 138 of 138
Organization, Functions, and Authority Delegations: Inspector General Office
Document Number: 06-1834
Type: Notice
Date: 2006-02-28
Agency: Office of the Secretary, Department of Labor
Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request, Renewal of Existing Collection
Document Number: 06-1832
Type: Notice
Date: 2006-02-28
Agency: Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request, Renewal of Existing Collection
Document Number: 06-1831
Type: Notice
Date: 2006-02-28
Agency: Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request
Document Number: 06-1830
Type: Notice
Date: 2006-02-28
Agency: Department of Homeland Security, Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Agency Information Collection Activities: Proposed Collection; Comment Request
Document Number: 06-1829
Type: Notice
Date: 2006-02-28
Agency: Department of Homeland Security, Citizenship and Immigration Services, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Changes in Flood Elevation Determinations
Document Number: 06-1826
Type: Rule
Date: 2006-02-28
Agency: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security
Modified Base (1% annual-chance) Flood Elevations (BFEs) are finalized for the communities listed below. These modified BFEs will be used to calculate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings and their contents.
Final Flood Elevation Determinations
Document Number: 06-1825
Type: Rule
Date: 2006-02-28
Agency: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security
Base (1% annual chance) Flood Elevations (BFEs) and modified BFEs are made final for the communities listed below. The BFEs and modified BFEs are the basis for the floodplain management measures that each community is required either to adopt or to show evidence of being already in effect in order to qualify or remain qualified for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).
Final Flood Elevation Determinations
Document Number: 06-1824
Type: Rule
Date: 2006-02-28
Agency: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security
Base (1% annual-chance) Flood Elevations and modified Base Flood Elevations (BFEs) are made final for the communities listed below. The BFEs and modified BFEs are the basis for the floodplain management measures that each community is required either to adopt or to show evidence of being already in effect in order to qualify or remain qualified for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).
Final Flood Elevation Determinations
Document Number: 06-1823
Type: Rule
Date: 2006-02-28
Agency: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security
Base (1% annual-chance) Flood Elevations and modified Base Flood Elevations (BFEs) are made final for the communities listed below. The BFEs and modified BFEs are the basis for the floodplain management measures that each community is required either to adopt or to show evidence of being already in effect in order to qualify or remain qualified for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).
Final Flood Elevation Determinations
Document Number: 06-1822
Type: Rule
Date: 2006-02-28
Agency: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security
Base (1% annual chance) Flood Elevations (BFEs) and modified BFEs are made final for the communities listed below. The BFEs and modified BFEs are the basis for the floodplain management measures that each community is required either to adopt or to show evidence of being already in effect in order to qualify or remain qualified for participation in the National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP).
Changes in Flood Elevation Determinations
Document Number: 06-1821
Type: Rule
Date: 2006-02-28
Agency: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security
Modified Base (1% annual-chance) Flood Elevations (BFEs) are finalized for the communities listed below. These modified elevations will be used to calculate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings and their contents.
Changes in Flood Elevation Determinations
Document Number: 06-1820
Type: Rule
Date: 2006-02-28
Agency: Federal Emergency Management Agency, Department of Homeland Security
Modified Base (1% annual chance) Flood Elevations (BFEs) are finalized for the communities listed below. These modified elevations will be used to calculate flood insurance premium rates for new buildings and their contents.
Information Collection Activity; Comment Request
Document Number: 06-1819
Type: Notice
Date: 2006-02-28
Agency: Department of Agriculture, Rural Utilities Service
In accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. Chapter 35, as amended), the Rural Utilities Service (RUS) invites comments on this information collection for which RUS intends to request approval from the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
Submission of OMB Review; Comment Request
Document Number: 06-1818
Type: Notice
Date: 2006-02-28
Agency: Department of Agriculture
Proposed Information Collection Activity; Comment Request
Document Number: 06-1817
Type: Notice
Date: 2006-02-28
Agency: Department of Health and Human Services, Administration for Children and Families, Children and Families Administration
Establishment of Class E Airspace; Nicholasville, KY
Document Number: 06-1813
Type: Rule
Date: 2006-02-28
Agency: Federal Aviation Administration, Department of Transportation
This action establishes Class E airspace at Nicholasville, KY. Area Navigation (RNAV) Global Positioning System (GPS) Standard Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAP) Runway (RWY) 9 and RWY 27 have been developed for Lucas Field Airport. As a result, controlled airspace extending upward from 700 feet Above Ground Level (AGL) is needed to contain the SIAPs and for Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations at Lucas Field Airport. The operating status of the airport will change from Visual Flight Rules (VFR) to include IFR operations concurrent with the publication of the SIAP.
Proposed Establishment of Class D and Class E Airspace; Proposed Amendment of Class E Airspace; Leesburg, FL
Document Number: 06-1812
Type: Proposed Rule
Date: 2006-02-28
Agency: Federal Aviation Administration, Department of Transportation
This notice proposes to establish Class D and Class E4 airspace and amend Class E5 airspace at Leesburg, FL. A Federal contract lower with a weather reporting system is being constructed at the Leesburg Regional Airport. Therefore, the airport will meet the criteria for establishment of Class D and Class E4 airspace. Class D surface area airspace and Class E4 airspace designated as an extension to Class D airspace is required when the control tower is open to contain existing Class D airspace is required when the control tower is open to contain existing Standard Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs) and other Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations at the airport. This action would establish Class D airspace extending upward from the surface to but not including 1,600 feet MSL within a 4.1-mile radius of the Leesburg Regional Airport and a Class E4 airspace extension that is 4.8 miles wide and extends 7 miles southeast of the airport. A regional evaluation has determined the existing Class E5 airspace area should be amended to contain the Nondirectional Radio Beacon (NDB) Runway (RWY) 31 SIAP. As a result, controlled airspace extending upward from 700 feet Above Ground Level (AGL) needed to contain the SIAP will decrease from a 7-mile radius of the airport to a 6.6-mile radius of the airport and provide for the procedure turn area. Additionally, a technical amendment is required as a result of a name change from the Leesburg Municipal Airport to the Leesburg Regional Airport, which was effective August 25, 1997.
Proposed Establishment of Class D Airspace; Bay St. Louis, MS
Document Number: 06-1811
Type: Proposed Rule
Date: 2006-02-28
Agency: Federal Aviation Administration, Department of Transportation
This notice proposes to establish Class D airspace at Bay St. Louis, MS. A federal contract tower with a weather reporting system is being constructed at Stennis International Airport. Therefore, the airport will meet criteria for Class D airspace. Class D surface area airspace is required when the control tower is open to contain Standard Instrument Approach Procedures (SIAPs) and other Instrument Flight Rules (IFR) operations at the airport. This action would establish Class D airspace extending upward from the surface to and including 2,500 feet MSL within a 4.2-mile radius of the airport.
Special Conditions: Cessna Aircraft Company Model 501 and 551 Airplanes; High Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF)
Document Number: 06-1810
Type: Rule
Date: 2006-02-28
Agency: Federal Aviation Administration, Department of Transportation
These special conditions are issued for Cessna Aircraft Company Model 501 and 551 series airplanes modified by Elliott Aviation Technical Product Development, Inc. These airplanes will have novel and unusual design features when compared to the state of technology envisioned in the airworthiness standards for transport category airplanes. The modification incorporates the installation of Universal Aviation Electronic Flight Display Systems. The applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for the protection of these systems from the effects of high- intensity-radiated fields (HIRF). These special conditions contain the additional safety standards that the Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness standards.
Federal Aviation Administration, Civil Aviation Registry, Aircraft Registration Branch Practices Related to the Cape Town Treaty
Document Number: 06-1809
Type: Rule
Date: 2006-02-28
Agency: Federal Aviation Administration, Department of Transportation
On January 3, 2005, the FAA published final rules implementing the Cape Town Treaty. on February 17, 2006, the FAA published a notice advising that the Cape Town Treaty becomes effective for the United States on March 1, 2006. The FAA is publishing this document to advise interested persons of certain procedures in the Aircraft Registration Branch related to the Cape Town Treaty.
Special Conditions: Raytheon Aircraft Company Model BAe.125 Series 800A; High-Intensity Radiated Fields (HIRF)
Document Number: 06-1808
Type: Rule
Date: 2006-02-28
Agency: Federal Aviation Administration, Department of Transportation
These special conditions are issued for Raytheon Aircraft Company Model BAe.125 Series 800A airplanes modified by Duncan Aviation Inc. These modified airplanes will have a novel or unusual design feature when compared to the state of technology envisioned in the airworthiness standards for transport category airplanes. The modification incorporates the installation of the Honeywell Primus Epic CDS/R Display System. The applicable airworthiness regulations do not contain adequate or appropriate safety standards for protecting these systems from the effects of high-intensity radiated fields (HIRF). These special conditions contain the additional safety standards the Administrator considers necessary to establish a level of safety equivalent to that established by the existing airworthiness standards.
Certifications and Exemptions Under the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972
Document Number: 06-1807
Type: Rule
Date: 2006-02-28
Agency: Department of Defense, Department of the Navy, Navy Department
The Department of the Navy is amending its certifications and exemptions under the International Regulations for Preventing Collisions at Sea, 1972 (72 COLREGS), to reflect that the Deputy Assistant Judge Advocate General of the Navy (Admiralty and Maritime Law) has determined that Causeway Ferry Power Modules (CFPM) and Warping Tugs (WT) are vessels of the Navy which, due to their special construction and purpose, cannot fully comply with certain provisions of the 72 COLREGS without interfering with their special function as naval ships. The intended effect of this rule is to warn mariners in waters where 72 COLREGS apply.
Security Zone; Atlantic Ocean Five Miles South of Boca Chica, FL
Document Number: 06-1806
Type: Rule
Date: 2006-02-28
Agency: Coast Guard, Department of Homeland Security
The Coast Guard is establishing a temporary security zone 5 miles south of Boca Chica, Florida, in support of aircraft recovery operations. This security zone is being implemented to ensure the security of the recovery site. All vessels will be excluded from the security zone until salvage operations are complete.
Agency Information Collection Activities: Extension of a Currently Approved Information Collection: Comment Request
Document Number: 06-1805
Type: Notice
Date: 2006-02-28
Agency: Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request
Document Number: 06-1804
Type: Notice
Date: 2006-02-28
Agency: Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request
Document Number: 06-1803
Type: Notice
Date: 2006-02-28
Agency: Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request
Document Number: 06-1802
Type: Notice
Date: 2006-02-28
Agency: Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request
Document Number: 06-1801
Type: Notice
Date: 2006-02-28
Agency: Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request
Document Number: 06-1800
Type: Notice
Date: 2006-02-28
Agency: Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Agency Information Collection Activities: Comment Request
Document Number: 06-1799
Type: Notice
Date: 2006-02-28
Agency: Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Georgia Update to Materials Incorporated by Reference
Document Number: 06-1789
Type: Rule
Date: 2006-02-28
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
EPA is publishing this action to provide the public with notice of the update to the Georgia State Implementation Plan (SIP) compilation. In particular, materials submitted by Georgia that are incorporated by reference (IBR) into the Georgia SIP are being updated to reflect EPA-approved revisions to Georgia's SIP that have occurred since the last update.
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Iowa
Document Number: 06-1788
Type: Rule
Date: 2006-02-28
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
EPA is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the state of Iowa for the purpose of establishing exemptions for indoor sources of air pollution that are not directly vented to the outside but have emissions that leave the building through doors, vents or other means. This revision also clarifies that the permitting exemptions do not relieve the owner or operator of any source from any obligation to comply with any other applicable requirements. The state has determined that air pollution emissions from this equipment are negligible and these exemptions are likely to result in no significant impact on human health or the environment.
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; State of Iowa
Document Number: 06-1787
Type: Proposed Rule
Date: 2006-02-28
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
EPA proposes to approve the State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the state of Iowa for the purpose of establishing exemptions for indoor sources of air pollution that are not directly vented to the outside but have emissions that leave the building through doors, vents or other means. This revision also clarifies that the permitting exemptions do not relieve the owner or operator of any source from any obligation to comply with any other applicable requirements. The state has determined that air pollution emissions from this equipment are negligible and these exemptions are likely to result in no significant impact on human health or the environment.
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Indiana; Dearborn County Sulfur Dioxide Emission Limits
Document Number: 06-1786
Type: Rule
Date: 2006-02-28
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
On November 25, 2005 (70 FR 70999), EPA published a direct final rule approving revisions to Indiana's sulfur dioxide (SO2) state implementation plan (SIP) for sources located in Dearborn County. These revisions to the SIP include: revising SO2 emission limits for existing sources; making minor corrections by removing obsolete rule language; and updating information for sources listed in the rule. On November 25, 2005 (70 FR 71071), EPA also published a proposed rule on this revision. The direct final rule stated that if EPA received an adverse comment, EPA would withdraw the direct final rule and address all public comments received in a subsequent final rule based on the proposed rule. EPA received an adverse comment and removed the direct final rule on January 27, 2006 (71 FR 4490). This rule responds to the comments received and announces EPA's final action.
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Wisconsin; Wisconsin Construction Permit Permanency SIP Revision
Document Number: 06-1785
Type: Rule
Date: 2006-02-28
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
EPA is taking final action to approve revisions to the Wisconsin State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the State of Wisconsin on December 8, 2005. Wisconsin had submitted for approval into its SIP a statutory revision designed to ensure the permanency of construction permit conditions. EPA proposed approval of this revision on January 12, 2006 (71 FR 1994). EPA is approving this revision because it is consistent with Federal regulations governing State permit programs. This revision also addresses one of the deficiencies identified in EPA's Notice of Deficiency (NOD), published in the Federal Register on March 4, 2004. (69 FR 10167.)
Endangered and Threatened Wildlife and Plants; 90-Day Finding on a Petition To List the Black Hills Mountainsnail as Threatened or Endangered
Document Number: 06-1770
Type: Proposed Rule
Date: 2006-02-28
Agency: Fish and Wildlife Service, Department of the Interior
We, the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service (Service), announce a 90-day finding on a petition to list the Black Hills mountainsnail (Oreohelix cooperi) as threatened or endangered under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (ESA). We find the petition does not provide substantial scientific information indicating that listing the Black Hills mountainsnail may be warranted. Therefore, we will not be initiating a further status review in response to this petition. We ask the public to submit to us any new information that becomes available concerning the status of the species or threats to it.
Occupational Exposure to Hexavalent Chromium
Document Number: 06-1589
Type: Rule
Date: 2006-02-28
Agency: Department of Labor, Occupational Safety and Health Administration
The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) is amending the existing standard which limits occupational exposure to hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)). OSHA has determined based upon the best evidence currently available that at the current permissible exposure limit (PEL) for Cr(VI), workers face a significant risk to material impairment of their health. The evidence in the record for this rulemaking indicates that workers exposed to Cr(VI) are at an increased risk of developing lung cancer. The record also indicates that occupational exposure to Cr(VI) may result in asthma, and damage to the nasal epithelia and skin. The final rule establishes an 8-hour time-weighted average (TWA) exposure limit of 5 micrograms of Cr(VI) per cubic meter of air (5 [mu]g/m\3\). This is a considerable reduction from the previous PEL of 1 milligram per 10 cubic meters of air (1 mg/10 m\3\, or 100 [mu]g/ m\3\) reported as CrO3, which is equivalent to a limit of 52 [mu]g/m\3\ as Cr(VI). The final rule also contains ancillary provisions for worker protection such as requirements for exposure determination, preferred exposure control methods, including a compliance alternative for a small sector for which the new PEL is infeasible, respiratory protection, protective clothing and equipment, hygiene areas and practices, medical surveillance, recordkeeping, and start-up dates that include four years for the implementation of engineering controls to meet the PEL. The final standard separately regulates general industry, construction, and shipyards in order to tailor requirements to the unique circumstances found in each of these sectors. The PEL established by this rule reduces the significant risk posed to workers by occupational exposure to Cr(VI) to the maximum extent that is technologically and economically feasible.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.