Social Security Administration September 5, 2012 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents

Results 1 - 1 of 1

Social Security Acquiescence Ruling (AR) 12-1(8); Correction; Petersen v. Astrue, 633 F.3d 633 (8th Cir. 2011): Whether a National Guard Technician Who Worked in Noncovered Employment is Exempt From the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP)-Title II of the Social Security Act

Document Number: 2012-21799

Type: Notice

Date: 2012-09-05

Agency: Social Security Administration, Agencies and Commissions

The Social Security Administration published a document in the Federal Register of August 27, 2012, in FR Doc. 2012-21065, in the first column, correct the ``title'' to read: Social Security Acquiescence Ruling (AR) 12-1(8); Petersen v. Astrue, 633 F.3d 633 (8th Cir. 2011); Whether a National Guard Technician Who Worked in Noncovered Employment is Exempt From the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP)Title II of the Social Security Act. Also, in the second column, correct the heading to read: Acquiescence Ruling 12-1(8)

https://regulations.justia.com/regulations/fedreg/2012/09/05/2012-21799.html