Social Security Acquiescence Ruling (AR) 12-1(8); Correction; Petersen v. Astrue, 633 F.3d 633 (8th Cir. 2011): Whether a National Guard Technician Who Worked in Noncovered Employment is Exempt From the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP)-Title II of the Social Security Act, 54646 [2012-21799]

Download as PDF 54646 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 172 / Wednesday, September 5, 2012 / Notices the Shares inadvisable, and trading in the Shares will be subject to Nasdaq Rule 5735(d)(2)(D), which sets forth circumstances under which Shares of the Fund may be halted. In addition, as noted above, investors will have ready access to information regarding the Fund’s holdings, the Intraday Indicative Value, the Disclosed Portfolio, and quotation and last-sale information for the Shares. The proposed rule change is designed to perfect the mechanism of a free and open market and, in general, to protect investors and the public interest in that it will facilitate the listing and trading of an additional type of activelymanaged exchange-traded product that will enhance competition among market participants, to the benefit of investors and the marketplace. As noted above, the Exchange has in place surveillance procedures relating to trading in the Shares and may obtain information via ISG from other exchanges that are members of ISG or with which the Exchange has entered into a comprehensive surveillance sharing agreement. In addition, as noted above, investors will have ready access to information regarding the Fund’s holdings, the Intraday Indicative Value, the Disclosed Portfolio, and quotation and last-sale information for the Shares. For the above reasons, Nasdaq believes the proposed rule change is consistent with the requirements of Section 6(b)(5) of the Act. B. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Burden on Competition Nasdaq does not believe that the proposed rule change will impose any burden on competition that is not necessary or appropriate in furtherance of the purposes of the Act. C. Self-Regulatory Organization’s Statement on Comments on the Proposed Rule Change Received From Members, Participants, or Others Written comments were neither solicited nor received. tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with NOTICES III. Date of Effectiveness of the Proposed Rule Change and Timing for Commission Action Within 45 days of the date of publication of this notice in the Federal Register or within such longer period (i) as the Commission may designate up to 90 days of such date if it finds such longer period to be appropriate and publishes its reasons for so finding or (ii) as to which the Exchange consents, the Commission shall: (a) By order approve or disapprove such proposed rule change, or (b) institute proceedings VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:14 Sep 04, 2012 Jkt 226001 to determine whether the proposed rule change should be disapproved. IV. Solicitation of Comments Interested persons are invited to submit written data, views, and arguments concerning the foregoing, including whether the proposed rule change is consistent with the Act. Comments may be submitted by any of the following methods: Electronic Comments • Use the Commission’s Internet comment form (https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml); or • Send an email to rulecomments@sec.gov. Please include File Number SR–NASDAQ–2012–098 on the subject line. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–NASDAQ–2012–098. This file number should be included on the subject line if email is used. To help the Commission process and review your comments more efficiently, please use only one method. The Commission will post all comments on the Commission’s Internet Web site at https://www.sec.gov/ rules/sro.shtml. Copies of the submission, all subsequent amendments, all written statements with respect to the proposed rule change that are filed with the Commission, and all written communications relating to the proposed rule change between the Commission and any person, other than those that may be withheld from the public in accordance with the provisions of 5 U.S.C. 552, will be available for Web site viewing and printing in the Commission’s Public Reference Room, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549, on official business days between the hours of 10 a.m. and 3 p.m. Copies of the filing also will be available for inspection and copying at the principal office of Nasdaq. All comments received will be posted without change; the Commission does not edit personal identifying information from submissions. You should submit only information that you wish to make available publicly. All submissions should refer to File Number SR–NASDAQ–2012–098 and should be submitted on or before September 26, 2012. Fmt 4703 BILLING CODE 8011–01–P SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION [Docket No. SSA–2012–0046] Social Security Acquiescence Ruling (AR) 12–1(8); Correction; Petersen v. Astrue, 633 F.3d 633 (8th Cir. 2011): Whether a National Guard Technician Who Worked in Noncovered Employment is Exempt From the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP)— Title II of the Social Security Act Social Security Administration. Notice of Social Security Acquiescence Ruling; Correction. ACTION: • Send paper comments in triplicate to Elizabeth M. Murphy, Secretary, Securities and Exchange Commission, Station Place, 100 F Street NE., Washington, DC 20549–1090. Frm 00093 [FR Doc. 2012–21815 Filed 9–4–12; 8:45 am] AGENCY: Paper Comments PO 00000 For the Commission, by the Division of Trading and Markets, pursuant to delegated authority.37 Kevin M. O’Neill, Deputy Secretary. Sfmt 4703 The Social Security Administration published a document in the Federal Register of August 27, 2012, in FR Doc. 2012–21065, in the first column, correct the ‘‘title’’ to read: Social Security Acquiescence Ruling (AR) 12–1(8); Petersen v. Astrue, 633 F.3d 633 (8th Cir. 2011); Whether a National Guard Technician Who Worked in Noncovered Employment is Exempt From the Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP)—Title II of the Social Security Act. Also, in the second column, correct the heading to read: Acquiescence Ruling 12–1(8) SUMMARY: Paul Kryglik, Director, Office of Regulations, Social Security Administration. [FR Doc. 2012–21799 Filed 9–4–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 4191–02–P DEPARTMENT OF STATE [Public Notice 8013] Culturally Significant Objects Imported for Exhibition Determinations: ‘‘Becoming Van Gogh’’ Notice is hereby given of the following determinations: Pursuant to the authority vested in me by the Act of October 19, 1965 (79 Stat. 985; 22 U.S.C. 2459), Executive Order 12047 of March 27, 1978, the Foreign Affairs Reform and Restructuring Act of 1998 (112 Stat. 2681, et seq.; 22 U.S.C. 6501 note, et seq.), Delegation of Authority No. 234 of October 1, 1999, and Delegation of Authority No. 236–3 of August 28, 2000 SUMMARY: 37 17 E:\FR\FM\05SEN1.SGM CFR 200.30–3(a)(12). 05SEN1

Agencies

Social Security Administration

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 172 (Wednesday, September 5, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Page 54646]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-21799]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

[Docket No. SSA-2012-0046]


Social Security Acquiescence Ruling (AR) 12-1(8); Correction; 
Petersen v. Astrue, 633 F.3d 633 (8th Cir. 2011): Whether a National 
Guard Technician Who Worked in Noncovered Employment is Exempt From the 
Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP)--Title II of the Social Security 
Act

AGENCY: Social Security Administration.

ACTION: Notice of Social Security Acquiescence Ruling; Correction.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: The Social Security Administration published a document in the 
Federal Register of August 27, 2012, in FR Doc. 2012-21065, in the 
first column, correct the ``title'' to read:
    Social Security Acquiescence Ruling (AR) 12-1(8); Petersen v. 
Astrue, 633 F.3d 633 (8th Cir. 2011); Whether a National Guard 
Technician Who Worked in Noncovered Employment is Exempt From the 
Windfall Elimination Provision (WEP)--Title II of the Social Security 
Act.
    Also, in the second column, correct the heading to read:
    Acquiescence Ruling 12-1(8)

Paul Kryglik,
Director, Office of Regulations, Social Security Administration.
[FR Doc. 2012-21799 Filed 9-4-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4191-02-P

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.