International Trade Commission January 27, 2015 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents
Results 1 - 5 of 5
Certain Uncoated Paper From Australia, Brazil, China, Indonesia, and Portugal; Institution of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Investigations and Scheduling of Preliminary Phase Investigations.
The Commission hereby gives notice of the institution of investigations and commencement of preliminary phase antidumping and countervailing duty investigation Nos. 701-TA-528-529 and 731-TA-1264- 1268 (Preliminary) under sections 703(a) and 733(a) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1671b(a) and 1673b(a)) (the Act) to determine whether there is a reasonable indication that an industry in the United States is materially injured or threatened with material injury, or the establishment of an industry in the United States is materially retarded, by reason of imports from Australia, Brazil, China, Indonesia, and Portugal of certain uncoated paper, provided for in subheadings 4802.56, 4802.57, 4802.62, and 4802.69 of the Harmonized Tariff Schedule of the United States, that are alleged to be sold in the United States at less than fair value and that are alleged to be subsidized by the Governments of China and Indonesia. Unless the Department of Commerce extends the time for initiation pursuant to sections 702(c)(1)(B) or 732(c)(1)(B) of the Act (19 U.S.C. 1671a(c)(1)(B) or 1673a(c)(1)(B)), the Commission must reach a preliminary determination in antidumping and countervailing duty investigations in 45 days, or in this case by Monday, March 9, 2015. The Commission's views must be transmitted to Commerce within five business days thereafter, or by Monday, March 16, 2015. For further information concerning the conduct of these investigations and rules of general application, consult the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A and B (19 CFR part 207).
Certain Ink Cartridges and Components Thereof: Institution of Investigation
Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on December 23, 2014, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Epson Portland Inc. of Hillsboro, Oregon; Epson America, Inc. of Long Beach, California; and Seiko Epson Corporation of Japan. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain ink cartridges and components thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 8,366,233 (``the '233 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 8,454,116 (``the '116 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 8,794,749 (``the '749 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 8,801,163 (``the '163 patent''); and U.S. Patent No. 8,882,513 (``the '513 patent''). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complainants request that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a general exclusion order, or in the alternative a limited exclusion order, and cease and desist orders.
Certain Network Devices, Related Software and Components Thereof (II); Institution of Investigation
Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on December 19, 2014, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Cisco Systems, Inc. of San Jose, California. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain network devices, related software and components thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,023,853 (``the '853 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 6,377,577 (``the '577 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 7,460,492 (``the '492 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 7,061,875 (``the '875 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 7,224,668 (``the '668 patent''); and U.S. Patent No. 8,051,211 (``the '211 patent''), and alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and a cease and desist order.
Certain Network Devices, Related Software and Components Thereof (I) Institution of Investigation
Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on December 19, 2014, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Cisco Systems, Inc. of San Jose, California. A supplement was filed on January 8, 2015. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain network devices, related software and components thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,162,537 (``the '537 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 8,356,296 (``the '296 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 7,290,164 (``the '164 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 7,340,597 (``the '597 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 6,741,592 (``the '592 patent''); and U.S. Patent No. 7,200,145 (``the '145 patent''), and alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion order and a cease and desist order.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.