Certain Network Devices, Related Software and Components Thereof (I) Institution of Investigation, 4314 [2015-01347]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
4314
Federal Register / Vol. 80, No. 17 / Tuesday, January 27, 2015 / Notices
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
Issued: January 21, 2015.
By order of the Commission.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015–01349 Filed 1–26–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–944]
with mobility impairments who will
need special assistance in gaining access
to the Commission should contact the
Office of the Secretary at (202) 205–
2000. General information concerning
the Commission may also be obtained
by accessing its internet server at
https://www.usitc.gov. The public record
for this investigation may be viewed on
the Commission’s electronic docket
(EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The
Office of Unfair Import Investigations,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
telephone (202) 205–2560.
AGENCY:
Authority: The authority for institution of
this investigation is contained in section 337
of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and
in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules
of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10
(2014).
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
December 19, 2014, under section 337 of
the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19
U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Cisco Systems,
Inc. of San Jose, California. A
supplement was filed on January 8,
2015. The complaint alleges violations
of section 337 based upon the
importation into the United States, the
sale for importation, and the sale within
the United States after importation of
certain network devices, related
software and components thereof by
reason of infringement of certain claims
of U.S. Patent No. 7,162,537 (‘‘the ’537
patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 8,356,296 (‘‘the
’296 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,290,164
(‘‘the ’164 patent’’); U.S. Patent No.
7,340,597 (‘‘the ’597 patent’’); U.S.
Patent No. 6,741,592 (‘‘the ’592 patent’’);
and U.S. Patent No. 7,200,145 (‘‘the ’145
patent’’), and alleges that an industry in
the United States exists as required by
subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
The complainant requests that the
Commission institute an investigation
and, after the investigation, issue a
limited exclusion order and a cease and
desist order.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for
any confidential information contained
therein, is available for inspection
during official business hours (8:45 a.m.
to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the
Secretary, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone
(202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired
individuals are advised that information
on this matter can be obtained by
contacting the Commission’s TDD
terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons
Scope of Investigation: Having
considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on
January 20, 2015, Ordered That—
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as
amended, an investigation be instituted
to determine whether there is a
violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of
section 337 in the importation into the
United States, the sale for importation,
or the sale within the United States after
importation of certain network devices,
related software and components
thereof by reason of infringement of one
or more of claims 1, 2, 8–11, and 17–19
of the ’537 patent; claims 1, 6, and 12
of the ’296 patent; claims 1, 5, 6, 9, and
18 of the ’164 patent; claims 1, 14, 15,
29, 39–42, 63, 64, 71–73, and 84–86 of
the ’597 patent; claims 6–10, 17, 18, 20,
21, 23, and 24 of the ’592 patent; claims
1, 3, 5, 7–11, 13, 15–29, 33–37, and 39–
46 of the ’145 patent, and whether an
industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section
337;
(2) For the purpose of the
investigation so instituted, the following
are hereby named as parties upon which
this notice of investigation shall be
served:
(a) The complainant is: Cisco
Systems, Inc., 170 W Tasman Drive, San
Jose, CA 95134.
(b) The respondent is the following
entity alleged to be in violation of
section 337, and is the party upon
which the complaint is to be served:
Arista Networks, Inc., 5453 Great
America Parkway, Santa Clara, CA
95054.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade
Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite
401, Washington, DC 20436; and
Certain Network Devices, Related
Software and Components Thereof (I)
Institution of Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
asabaliauskas on DSK5VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:01 Jan 26, 2015
Jkt 235001
PO 00000
Frm 00072
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
(3) For the investigation so instituted,
the Chief Administrative Law Judge,
U.S. International Trade Commission,
shall designate the presiding
Administrative Law Judge, and the
Chief Administrative Law Judge is
authorized to consider whether to
consolidate Inv. No. 337–TA–944 with
Inv. No. 337–TA–945, and to
consolidate them if he deems it
appropriate.
Responses to the complaint and the
notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondent in
accordance with section 210.13 of the
Commission’s Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to
19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such
responses will be considered by the
Commission if received not later than 20
days after the date of service by the
Commission of the complaint and the
notice of investigation. Extensions of
time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of
investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of the respondent to file a
timely response to each allegation in the
complaint and in this notice may be
deemed to constitute a waiver of the
right to appear and contest the
allegations of the complaint and this
notice, and to authorize the
administrative law judge and the
Commission, without further notice to
the respondent, to find the facts to be as
alleged in the complaint and this notice
and to enter an initial determination
and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the
issuance of an exclusion order or a cease
and desist order or both directed against
the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: January 21, 2015.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015–01347 Filed 1–26–15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020–02–P
INTERNATIONAL TRADE
COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337–TA–946]
Certain Ink Cartridges and
Components Thereof: Institution of
Investigation
U.S. International Trade
Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given that a
complaint was filed with the U.S.
International Trade Commission on
December 23, 2014, under section 337 of
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\27JAN1.SGM
27JAN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 80, Number 17 (Tuesday, January 27, 2015)]
[Notices]
[Page 4314]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2015-01347]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
[Investigation No. 337-TA-944]
Certain Network Devices, Related Software and Components Thereof
(I) Institution of Investigation
AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the
U.S. International Trade Commission on December 19, 2014, under section
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of
Cisco Systems, Inc. of San Jose, California. A supplement was filed on
January 8, 2015. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based
upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation,
and the sale within the United States after importation of certain
network devices, related software and components thereof by reason of
infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 7,162,537 (``the '537
patent''); U.S. Patent No. 8,356,296 (``the '296 patent''); U.S. Patent
No. 7,290,164 (``the '164 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 7,340,597 (``the
'597 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 6,741,592 (``the '592 patent''); and
U.S. Patent No. 7,200,145 (``the '145 patent''), and alleges that an
industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2)
of section 337.
The complainant requests that the Commission institute an
investigation and, after the investigation, issue a limited exclusion
order and a cease and desist order.
ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S.
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Room 112, Washington,
DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired individuals are
advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting
the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons with mobility
impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the
Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205-
2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be
obtained by accessing its internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Unfair Import
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202)
205-2560.
Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended,
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2014).
Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S.
International Trade Commission, on January 20, 2015, Ordered That--
(1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the
sale within the United States after importation of certain network
devices, related software and components thereof by reason of
infringement of one or more of claims 1, 2, 8-11, and 17-19 of the '537
patent; claims 1, 6, and 12 of the '296 patent; claims 1, 5, 6, 9, and
18 of the '164 patent; claims 1, 14, 15, 29, 39-42, 63, 64, 71-73, and
84-86 of the '597 patent; claims 6-10, 17, 18, 20, 21, 23, and 24 of
the '592 patent; claims 1, 3, 5, 7-11, 13, 15-29, 33-37, and 39-46 of
the '145 patent, and whether an industry in the United States exists as
required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
(2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of
investigation shall be served:
(a) The complainant is: Cisco Systems, Inc., 170 W Tasman Drive,
San Jose, CA 95134.
(b) The respondent is the following entity alleged to be in
violation of section 337, and is the party upon which the complaint is
to be served: Arista Networks, Inc., 5453 Great America Parkway, Santa
Clara, CA 95054.
(c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436;
and
(3) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the
presiding Administrative Law Judge, and the Chief Administrative Law
Judge is authorized to consider whether to consolidate Inv. No. 337-TA-
944 with Inv. No. 337-TA-945, and to consolidate them if he deems it
appropriate.
Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be
submitted by the named respondent in accordance with section 210.13 of
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13.
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless
good cause therefor is shown.
Failure of the respondent to file a timely response to each
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent,
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.
By order of the Commission.
Issued: January 21, 2015.
Lisa R. Barton,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2015-01347 Filed 1-26-15; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
