International Trade Commission November 29, 2011 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents
Results 1 - 3 of 3
Certain Wiper Blades; Institution of Investigation
Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on October 26, 2011, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Robert Bosch LLC of Farmington Hills, Michigan. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain wiper blades by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,523,218 (``the '218 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 6,553,607 (``the '607 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 6,611,988 (``the '988 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 6,675,434 (``the '434 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 6,836,926 (``the '926 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 6,944,905 (``the '905 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 6,973,698 (``the '698 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 7,293,321 (``the '321 patent''); and U.S. Patent No. 7,523,520 (``the '520 patent''). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsections (a)(2) and (3) of section 337. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order and cease and desist order.
Certain Dynamic Random Access Memory Devices, and Products Containing Same; Receipt of Complaint; Solicitation of Comments Relating to the Public Interest
Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has received a complaint entitled In Re Certain Dynamic Random Access Memory Devices, and Products Containing Same, DN 2859; the Commission is soliciting comments on any public interest issues raised by the complaint.
Investigations: Terminations, Modifications and Rulings: Certain Electronic Devices With Image Processing Systems, Components Thereof, and Associated Software
Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined that no violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) has been shown in the above- captioned investigation and that the investigation is terminated.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.