Certain Wiper Blades; Institution of Investigation, 73677-73678 [2011-30568]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 29, 2011 / Notices Issued: November 21, 2011. James R. Holbein, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2011–30567 Filed 11–28–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–724] Investigations: Terminations, Modifications and Rulings: Certain Electronic Devices With Image Processing Systems, Components Thereof, and Associated Software U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined that no violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) has been shown in the above-captioned investigation and that the investigation is terminated. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clark S. Cheney, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2661. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on May 19, 2010, based on a complaint filed by S3 Graphics Co. Ltd. and S3 Graphics Inc. (collectively, ‘‘S3G’’). 75 FR 38118 (July 1, 2010). The complaint alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1337) by reason of infringement of various claims of United States Patent Nos. 6,658,146 (‘‘the ’146 patent’’); 6,683,978 (‘‘the ’978 patent’’); 6,775,417 (‘‘the ’417 patent’’); and 7,043,087 (‘‘the ’087 patent’’). The complaint named Apple Inc. of mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:20 Nov 28, 2011 Jkt 226001 Cupertino, California (‘‘Apple’’) as the only respondent. On July 1, 2011, the ALJ issued a final ID in this investigation finding that Apple violated section 337. Specifically, the ALJ found that Apple computers utilizing an image compression format called DXT infringe claim 11 of the ’978 patent and claims 4 and 16 of the ’146 patent. The ALJ recommended that the Commission issue a limited exclusion order and a cease and desist order. The ALJ found no violation with respect to the other asserted claims, which are claim 13 of the ’146 patent, claims 14 and 16 of the ’978 patent, claims 7, 12, 15, and 23 of the ’417 patent, and claims 1 and 6 of the ’087 patent. On September 2, 2011, the Commission determined to review the ID in its entirety. On September 15, 2011, non-parties Advanced Micro Devices, Inc. (‘‘AMD’’) and its subsidiaries ATI Technologies ULC and ATI International SRL filed a motion to intervene and terminate the investigation based on a claim that AMD owns the patents at issue and declines to assert them in this investigation. On September 19, 2011, respondent Apple filed its own motion to terminate based on AMD’s patent ownership claims. Subsequently, the Commission determined to extend the target date for completion of the investigation until November 21, 2011. Having examined the record of this investigation, including the ALJ’s final ID and the submissions of the parties and non-parties, the Commission has determined to reverse the ALJ’s finding of a violation of section 337 and find no violation. Additionally, the Commission has determined to deny AMD’s motion to file public interest comments out of time, to grant AMD’s motion to file a reply in connection with its motion to intervene and terminate, to deny AMD’s motion to intervene and terminate, and to deny Apple’s motion to terminate. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in part 210 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR part 210). By order of the Commission. Issued: November 21, 2011. James R. Holbein, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2011–30566 Filed 11–28–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P PO 00000 Frm 00096 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 73677 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337–TA–816] Certain Wiper Blades; Institution of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on October 26, 2011, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Robert Bosch LLC of Farmington Hills, Michigan. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain wiper blades by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,523,218 (‘‘the ’218 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 6,553,607 (‘‘the ’607 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 6,611,988 (‘‘the ’988 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 6,675,434 (‘‘the ’434 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 6,836,926 (‘‘the ’926 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 6,944,905 (‘‘the ’905 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 6,973,698 (‘‘the ’698 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 7,293,321 (‘‘the ’321 patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. 7,523,520 (‘‘the ’520 patent’’). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsections (a)(2) and (3) of section 337. The complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order and cease and desist order. SUMMARY: The complaint, except for any confidential information contained therein, is available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at (202) 205– 2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at https:// www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. ADDRESSES: E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM 29NON1 73678 Federal Register / Vol. 76, No. 229 / Tuesday, November 29, 2011 / Notices The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205–2560. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2011). Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on November 21, 2011, Ordered that— (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain wiper blades that infringe one or more of claims 1–3, 5– 7, and 10 of the ’218 patent; claims 1– 12 and 14 of the ’607 patent; claims 1– 6, 8–12, and 15 of the ’988 patent; claims 1, 5, 7, and 13 of the ’434 patent; claims 1–3 of the ’926 patent; claims 1, 3, 4, 8, 10, 11, 13, and 15–18 of the ’905 patent; claim 1 of the ’698 patent; claims 1–5, 9, and 10 of the ’321 patent; and claims 1–5, 9, 10, 18, and 19 of the ’520 patent; and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsections (a)(2) and (3) of section 337; (2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served: (a) The complainant is: Robert Bosch LLC, 38000 Hills Tech Drive, Farmington Hills, MI 48331. (b) The respondent is the following entity alleged to be in violation of section 337, and is the party upon which the complaint is to be served: ADM21 Co., Ltd., 742–6 Wonsi-dong, Danwon-gu, Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do, Korea, 425–090; ADM21 Co. (North America) Ltd., 333 Sylvan Avenue, Suite 106, Englewood Cliffs, NJ 07632; Alberee Products, Inc., d/b/a Saver Automotive Products, Inc., 510 E. Preston Street, Baltimore, MD 21202; API Korea Co., Ltd., 45B–4L, #435–3, Nonhyeon-Dong, NamDong-Gu Incheon, Korea, 405–848; Cequent Consumer Products, Inc., 29000–2 Aurora Rd., Solon, OH 44139; Corea Autoparts Producing Corporation, d/b/a CAP America, 800, Oidap-Dong, Sangju-City, Gyeongsangbuk-do, South Korea, 742–320; Danyang UPC Auto Parts Co., Ltd., Dachengqiao Industrial Park, Jiepai VerDate Mar<15>2010 15:20 Nov 28, 2011 Jkt 226001 Town, Danyang City, Jiangsu, China, 212323; Fu-Gang Co., Ltd., No. 65, Ligong 2nd Rd., Wujie Township, Yilan County 268, Taiwan; PIAA Corporation USA, 3004 NE. 181st Avenue, Portland, OR 97230; Pylon Manufacturing Corp., 1341 W. Newport Center Drive, Deerfield Beach, FL 33442; RainEater, LLC, 2800 W. 21st St., Erie, PA 16506; Scan Top Enterprise Co., Ltd., RM. 4E– 17, No. 5, Sec. 5, Hsin Yi Road, Taipei 110, Taiwan R.O.C.; Winplus North America Inc., 820 South Wanamaker Ave., Ontario, CA 91761. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE (c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and (3) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge. Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent. Cathinone (1235) .......................... Methaqualone (2565) ................... Lysergic acid diethylamide (7315) Marihuana (7360) ......................... Tetrahydrocannabinols (7370) ..... 4-Methyl-2,5dimethoxyamphetamine (7395). 3,4-Methylenedioxyamphetamine (7400). Codeine-N-oxide (9053) ............... Heroin (9200) ............................... Morphine-N-oxide (9307) ............. Amphetamine (1100) .................... Methamphetamine (1105) ............ Phenmetrazine (1631) .................. Methylphenidate (1724) ................ Amobarbital (2125) ....................... Pentobarbital (2270) ..................... Secobarbital (2315) ...................... Glutethimide (2550) ...................... Phencyclidine (7471) .................... 4-Anilino-N-phenethyl-4-piperidine. (8333) ........................................... Phenylacetone (8501) .................. Alphaprodine (9010) ..................... Anileridine (9020) ......................... Cocaine (9041) ............................. Codeine (9050) ............................. Dihydrocodeine (9120) ................. Oxycodone (9143) ........................ Hydromorphone (9150) ................ Diphenoxylate (9170) ................... Hydrocodone (9193) ..................... Levorphanol (9220) ...................... Meperidine (9230) ........................ Methadone (9250) ........................ Dextropropoxyphene, bulk (nondosage forms) (9273). Morphine (9300) ........................... Thebaine (9333) ........................... Oxymorphone (9652) ................... Alfentanil (9737) ........................... Sufentanil (9740) .......................... By order of the Commission. Issued: November 21, 2011. James R. Holbein, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2011–30568 Filed 11–28–11; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P PO 00000 Frm 00097 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 Drug Enforcement Administration Importer of Controlled Substances; Notice of Registration By Notice dated July 11, 2011, and published in the Federal Register on July 19, 2011, 76 FR 42732, United States Pharmacopeial Convention, 12601 Twinbrook Parkway, Rockville, Maryland 20852, made application by renewal to the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) to be registered as an importer of the following basic classes of controlled substances: Drug Schedule I I I I I I I I I I II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II II The company plans to import reference standards for sale to researchers and analytical labs. No comments or objections have been received. DEA has considered the factors in 21 U.S.C. 823(a) and 952(a) and determined that the registration of United States Pharmacopeial Convention to import the basic classes of controlled substances is consistent E:\FR\FM\29NON1.SGM 29NON1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 76, Number 229 (Tuesday, November 29, 2011)]
[Notices]
[Pages 73677-73678]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2011-30568]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 337-TA-816]


Certain Wiper Blades; Institution of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the 
U.S. International Trade Commission on October 26, 2011, under section 
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of 
Robert Bosch LLC of Farmington Hills, Michigan. The complaint alleges 
violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United 
States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States 
after importation of certain wiper blades by reason of infringement of 
certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,523,218 (``the '218 patent''); U.S. 
Patent No. 6,553,607 (``the '607 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 6,611,988 
(``the '988 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 6,675,434 (``the '434 patent''); 
U.S. Patent No. 6,836,926 (``the '926 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 
6,944,905 (``the '905 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 6,973,698 (``the '698 
patent''); U.S. Patent No. 7,293,321 (``the '321 patent''); and U.S. 
Patent No. 7,523,520 (``the '520 patent''). The complaint further 
alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by 
subsections (a)(2) and (3) of section 337.
    The complainant requests that the Commission institute an 
investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order 
and cease and desist order.

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information 
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business 
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. Hearing impaired 
individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained 
by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on (202) 205-1810. Persons 
with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining 
access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 
(202) 205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also 
be obtained by accessing its internet server at 
http:[sol][sol]www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation 
may be viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at 
http:[sol][sol]edis.usitc.gov.

[[Page 73678]]


FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: The Office of Unfair Import 
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 
205-2560.

    Authority:  The authority for institution of this investigation 
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2011).
    Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. 
International Trade Commission, on November 21, 2011, Ordered that--
    (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether 
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain wiper blades 
that infringe one or more of claims 1-3, 5-7, and 10 of the '218 
patent; claims 1-12 and 14 of the '607 patent; claims 1-6, 8-12, and 15 
of the '988 patent; claims 1, 5, 7, and 13 of the '434 patent; claims 
1-3 of the '926 patent; claims 1, 3, 4, 8, 10, 11, 13, and 15-18 of the 
'905 patent; claim 1 of the '698 patent; claims 1-5, 9, and 10 of the 
'321 patent; and claims 1-5, 9, 10, 18, and 19 of the '520 patent; and 
whether an industry in the United States exists as required by 
subsections (a)(2) and (3) of section 337;
    (2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the 
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of 
investigation shall be served:

    (a) The complainant is:

Robert Bosch LLC, 38000 Hills Tech Drive, Farmington Hills, MI 48331.

    (b) The respondent is the following entity alleged to be in 
violation of section 337, and is the party upon which the complaint is 
to be served:

ADM21 Co., Ltd., 742-6 Wonsi-dong, Danwon-gu, Ansan-si, Gyeonggi-do, 
Korea, 425-090;
ADM21 Co. (North America) Ltd., 333 Sylvan Avenue, Suite 106, Englewood 
Cliffs, NJ 07632;
Alberee Products, Inc., d/b/a Saver Automotive Products, Inc., 510 E. 
Preston Street, Baltimore, MD 21202;
API Korea Co., Ltd., 45B-4L, 435-3, Nonhyeon-Dong, NamDong-Gu 
Incheon, Korea, 405-848;
Cequent Consumer Products, Inc., 29000-2 Aurora Rd., Solon, OH 44139;
Corea Autoparts Producing Corporation, d/b/a CAP America, 800, Oidap-
Dong, Sangju-City, Gyeongsangbuk-do, South Korea, 742-320;
Danyang UPC Auto Parts Co., Ltd., Dachengqiao Industrial Park, Jiepai 
Town, Danyang City, Jiangsu, China, 212323;
Fu-Gang Co., Ltd., No. 65, Ligong 2nd Rd., Wujie Township, Yilan County 
268, Taiwan;
PIAA Corporation USA, 3004 NE. 181st Avenue, Portland, OR 97230;
Pylon Manufacturing Corp., 1341 W. Newport Center Drive, Deerfield 
Beach, FL 33442;
RainEater, LLC, 2800 W. 21st St., Erie, PA 16506;
Scan Top Enterprise Co., Ltd., RM. 4E-17, No. 5, Sec. 5, Hsin Yi Road, 
Taipei 110, Taiwan R.O.C.;
Winplus North America Inc., 820 South Wanamaker Ave., Ontario, CA 
91761.

    (c) The Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International 
Trade Commission, 500 E Street SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; 
and
    (3) For the investigation so instituted, the Chief Administrative 
Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the 
presiding Administrative Law Judge.
    Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be 
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. 
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d)-(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be 
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after 
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice 
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the 
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless 
good cause therefor is shown.
    Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each 
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to 
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations 
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative 
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, 
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and 
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing 
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or 
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: November 21, 2011.
James R. Holbein,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2011-30568 Filed 11-28-11; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.