International Trade Commission February 15, 2011 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents
Results 1 - 9 of 9
Cut-to-Length Carbon Steel Plate From India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan and Korea
The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with full reviews pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)) to determine whether revocation of the countervailing duty orders on cut-to-length carbon steel plate from India, Indonesia, Italy, and Korea and the antidumping duty orders on cut-to-length carbon steel plate from India, Indonesia, Italy, Japan, and Korea would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. A schedule for the reviews will be established and announced at a later date. For further information concerning the conduct of these reviews and rules of general application, consult the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207).
Notice of Receipt of Complaint; Solicitation of Comments Relating to the Public Interest
Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has received a complaint entitled In Re Certain Display Devices, Including Digital Televisions and Monitors II, DN 2787; the Commission is soliciting comments on any public interest issues raised by the complaint.
Forged Stainless Steel Flanges From India and Taiwan
The subject five-year reviews were initiated in November 2010 to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty orders on forged stainless steel flanges from India and Taiwan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. On January 31, 2011, the Department of Commerce published notice that it was revoking the orders effective January 23, 2011, because ``the domestic interested parties did not participate in these sunset reviews, * * *'' (76 FR 5331). Accordingly, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), the subject reviews are terminated.
Granular Polytetrafluoroethylene Resin From Japan
The subject five-year review was initiated in November 2010 to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty order on granular polytetrafluoroethylene resin from Japan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. On January 20, 2011, the Department of Commerce published notice that it was revoking the order effective December 22, 2010, because ``the domestic parties did not participate in this review.'' (76 FR 3614). Accordingly, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), the subject review is terminated.
Superalloy Degassed Chromium From Japan
The subject five-year review was initiated in November 2010 to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty order on superalloy degassed chromium from Japan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. On December 22, 2010, the Department of Commerce published notice that it was revoking the order effective December 22, 2010, because ``no domestic interested party responded to the notice of initiation of the sunset review by the applicable deadline.'' (75 FR 80457). Accordingly, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), the subject review is terminated.
Polyethylene Terephthalate (Pet) Film From Korea
The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with a full review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping order on PET film from Korea would be likely to lead to a continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. The Commission also hereby gives notice of the scheduling of a full review concerning the antidumping order on PET film from Korea. For further information concerning the conduct of this review and rules of general application, consult the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207).
Glycine From China
The Commission hereby gives notice that it will proceed with a full review pursuant to section 751(c)(5) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)(5)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty order on glycine from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury within a reasonably foreseeable time. The Commission also hereby gives notice of the scheduling of the full review concerning the antidumping duty order on glycine from China. For further information concerning the conduct of this review and rules of general application, consult the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207).
Sparklers From China
The subject five-year review was initiated in November 2010 to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty order on sparklers from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. On January 28, 2011, the Department of Commerce published notice that it was revoking the order effective December 5, 2010, because ``the domestic interested parties did not participate in this sunset review, * * *'' (76 FR 5140). Accordingly, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), the subject review is terminated.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.