International Trade Commission September 27, 2010 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents
Results 1 - 3 of 3
In the Matter of Certain Game Controllers; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation on the Basis of a Settlement Agreement; Termination of the Investigation
Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the final initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 6) issued by the presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ'') on August 24, 2010 granting a joint motion to terminate the above-captioned investigation based upon a settlement agreement.
In the Matter of: Certain Wind and Solar-Powered Light Posts and Street Lamps; Notice of Investigation
Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on August 6, 2010, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Duggal Dimensions LLC of New York, New York; Duggal Energy Solutions, LLC of New York, New York; and Duggal Visual Solutions, Inc. of New York, New York. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain wind and solar-powered light posts and street lamps by reason of infringement of the claimed design of U.S. Patent No. D610,732 (``the `732 patent''). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complainants request that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order and cease and desist orders.
In the Matter of Certain Liquid Crystal Display Devices and Products Interoperable With the Same; Notice of Investigation
Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on August 23, 2010, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Chimei Innolux Corporation of Taiwan; Chi Mei Optoelectronics U.S.A., Inc. of San Jose, California; and Innolux Corporation of Austin, Texas. Letters supplementing the complaint were filed on September 2 and 10, 2010. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain liquid crystal display devices and products interoperable with the same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,134,092 (``the `092 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 6,671,019 (``the `019 patent''); and U.S. Patent No. 5,732,241 (``the `241 patent''). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complainants request that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order and cease and desist orders.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
