In the Matter of Certain Liquid Crystal Display Devices and Products Interoperable With the Same; Notice of Investigation, 59290-59291 [2010-24062]

Download as PDF 59290 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 186 / Monday, September 27, 2010 / Notices MISSOURI Callaway County White Cloud Presbyterian Church and Cemetery, S side SR F at intersection with CR 232, Fulton, 10000817 Jackson County Baltimore Avenue Historic District, 807–815 Wyandotte, Kansas City, 10000824 Jasper County Joplin and Wall Avenues Historic District, (Historic Resources of Joplin, Missouri) Portions of S. Joplin and Wall Aves, W First, Second, Third Sts, Joplin, 10000819 South Main Street Historic District, (Historic Resources of Joplin, Missouri) W side S Main St, between W First and W Second Sts, Joplin, 10000818 TEXAS Travis County Westgate Tower, 1122 Colorado St, Travis, 10000820 WISCONSIN Milwaukee County Kegel’s Inn, 5901–5905 W National Ave, West Allis, 10000823 Koelsch Funeral Home, 7622 W Greenfield Ave, West Allis, 10000822 McMicken, Alexander Herschel and Pauline G., House, 1508 S 80th St, West Allis, 10000816 [FR Doc. 2010–24043 Filed 9–24–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–715] In the Matter of Certain Game Controllers; Notice of Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation on the Basis of a Settlement Agreement; Termination of the Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the final initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 6) issued by the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) on August 24, 2010 granting a joint motion to terminate the abovecaptioned investigation based upon a settlement agreement. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jia Chen, Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–4737. Copies of non-confidential documents srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:01 Sep 24, 2010 Jkt 220001 filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server (http://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on May 9, 2010, based on a complaint filed by Microsoft Corporation (‘‘Microsoft’’) of Redmond, Washington. 75 FR 24743 (May 9, 2010). The complaint alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain game controllers by reason of infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. D521,015; D522,011; D547,763; D581,422; D563,480; and D565,668. The complaint named the following respondents: Datel Design and Development Inc. of Clearwater, Florida, and Datel Design and Development Ltd. of Staffordshire, United Kingdom (collectively, ‘‘Datel’’). On August 12, 2010, Microsoft and Datel jointly moved to terminate this investigation on the basis of a settlement agreement pursuant to Commission Rule 210.21(b). On August 17, 2010, the Commission investigative attorney filed a response supporting the motion. On August 24, 2010, the ALJ issued the subject ID granting the joint motion. No petitions for review of the ID were filed. The Commission has determined not to review the subject ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in sections 210.21(b) and 210.42–.45 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.21(b), 210.42– .45). By order of the Commission. Issued: September 21, 2010. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2010–24067 Filed 9–24–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P PO 00000 Frm 00085 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337–TA–737] In the Matter of Certain Liquid Crystal Display Devices and Products Interoperable With the Same; Notice of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on August 23, 2010, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Chimei Innolux Corporation of Taiwan; Chi Mei Optoelectronics U.S.A., Inc. of San Jose, California; and Innolux Corporation of Austin, Texas. Letters supplementing the complaint were filed on September 2 and 10, 2010. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain liquid crystal display devices and products interoperable with the same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,134,092 (‘‘the ‘092 patent’’); U.S. Patent No. 6,671,019 (‘‘the ‘019 patent’’); and U.S. Patent No. 5,732,241 (‘‘the ‘241 patent’’). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complainants request that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order and cease and desist orders. SUMMARY: The complaint, except for any confidential information contained therein, is available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–205–2000. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its internet server at http:// www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the ADDRESSES: E:\FR\FM\27SEN1.SGM 27SEN1 Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 186 / Monday, September 27, 2010 / Notices Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vu Q. Bui, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205–2582. srobinson on DSKHWCL6B1PROD with NOTICES Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2010). Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on September 21, 2010, ordered that— (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain liquid crystal display devices and products interoperable with the same that infringe one or more of claims 1, 5, 12, 17, 18, 20, 21, and 26 of the ‘092 patent; claims 1–4, 8, 11–14, and 19 of the ‘019 patent; and claims 1, 5–7, 9, 10, 16, 19– 21, 23, and 25 of the ‘241 patent, and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337; (2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served: (a) The complainants are: Chimei Innolux Corporation, No. 160 Kesyue Rd., Jhunan Science Park, Miaoli County 350, Taiwan; Chi Mei Optoelectronics U.S.A., Inc., 101 Metro Dr., STE 510, San Jose, CA 95110; Innolux Corporation, 2525 Brockton Drive, Austin, TX 78758. (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served: Sony Corporation, 1–7–1, Konan, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan; Sony Corporation of America, 550 Madison Ave., New York, NY 10022; Sony Electronics Corporation, 16530 Via Esprillo, San Diego, CA 92127; Sony Computer Entertainment America, LLC, 919 East Hillsdale Blvd., Foster City, CA 94404. (c) The Commission investigative attorney, party to this investigation, is Vu Q. Bui, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:01 Sep 24, 2010 Jkt 220001 (3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Paul J. Luckern, Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge. Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d)–(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent. By order of the Commission. Issued: September 21, 2010. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2010–24062 Filed 9–24–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337–TA–736] In the Matter of: Certain Wind and Solar-Powered Light Posts and Street Lamps; Notice of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on August 6, 2010, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Duggal Dimensions LLC of New York, New York; Duggal Energy Solutions, LLC of SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00086 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 59291 New York, New York; and Duggal Visual Solutions, Inc. of New York, New York. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain wind and solar-powered light posts and street lamps by reason of infringement of the claimed design of U.S. Patent No. D610,732 (‘‘the ‘732 patent’’). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complainants request that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order and cease and desist orders. The complaint, except for any confidential information contained therein, is available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–205–2000. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202–205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http:// www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Christopher G. Paulraj, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone (202) 205–3052. ADDRESSES: Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2010). Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on September 21, 2010, ordered that— (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain wind and solar- E:\FR\FM\27SEN1.SGM 27SEN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 186 (Monday, September 27, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Pages 59290-59291]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-24062]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 337-TA-737]


In the Matter of Certain Liquid Crystal Display Devices and 
Products Interoperable With the Same; Notice of Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission

ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the 
U.S. International Trade Commission on August 23, 2010, under section 
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of 
Chimei Innolux Corporation of Taiwan; Chi Mei Optoelectronics U.S.A., 
Inc. of San Jose, California; and Innolux Corporation of Austin, Texas. 
Letters supplementing the complaint were filed on September 2 and 10, 
2010. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain liquid 
crystal display devices and products interoperable with the same by 
reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,134,092 
(``the `092 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 6,671,019 (``the `019 patent''); 
and U.S. Patent No. 5,732,241 (``the `241 patent''). The complaint 
further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as 
required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
    The complainants request that the Commission institute an 
investigation and, after the investigation, issue an exclusion order 
and cease and desist orders.

ADDRESSES: The complaint, except for any confidential information 
contained therein, is available for inspection during official business 
hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, 
Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing impaired 
individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained 
by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons 
with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining 
access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 
202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be 
obtained by accessing its internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The 
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the

[[Page 59291]]

Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Vu Q. Bui, Esq., Office of Unfair 
Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone 
(202) 205-2582.

    Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation 
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and 
Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2010).
    Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. 
International Trade Commission, on September 21, 2010, ordered that--
    (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether 
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain liquid 
crystal display devices and products interoperable with the same that 
infringe one or more of claims 1, 5, 12, 17, 18, 20, 21, and 26 of the 
`092 patent; claims 1-4, 8, 11-14, and 19 of the `019 patent; and 
claims 1, 5-7, 9, 10, 16, 19-21, 23, and 25 of the `241 patent, and 
whether an industry in the United States exists as required by 
subsection (a)(2) of section 337;
    (2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the 
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of 
investigation shall be served:
    (a) The complainants are:

Chimei Innolux Corporation, No. 160 Kesyue Rd., Jhunan Science Park, 
Miaoli County 350, Taiwan;
Chi Mei Optoelectronics U.S.A., Inc., 101 Metro Dr., STE 510, San Jose, 
CA 95110;
Innolux Corporation, 2525 Brockton Drive, Austin, TX 78758.

    (b) The respondents are the following entities alleged to be in 
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint 
is to be served:
Sony Corporation, 1-7-1, Konan, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan;

Sony Corporation of America, 550 Madison Ave., New York, NY 10022;
Sony Electronics Corporation, 16530 Via Esprillo, San Diego, CA 92127;
Sony Computer Entertainment America, LLC, 919 East Hillsdale Blvd., 
Foster City, CA 94404.
    (c) The Commission investigative attorney, party to this 
investigation, is Vu Q. Bui, Esq., Office of Unfair Import 
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 
Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436; and
    (3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Paul J. 
Luckern, Chief Administrative Law Judge, U.S. International Trade 
Commission, shall designate the presiding Administrative Law Judge.
    Responses to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be 
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. 
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d)-(e) and 210.13(a), such responses will be 
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after 
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice 
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting responses to the 
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless 
good cause therefor is shown.
    Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each 
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to 
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations 
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative 
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, 
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and 
to enter an initial determination and a final determination containing 
such findings, and may result in the issuance of an exclusion order or 
a cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent.

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: September 21, 2010.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-24062 Filed 9-24-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P