International Trade Commission July 2010 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 10) of the presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ'') terminating the above-captioned investigation as to all remaining respondents based on a settlement agreement.

Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on June 23, 2010, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of STC.UNM of Albuquerque, New Mexico. A supplement to the complaint was filed on July 15, 2010. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain semiconductor products made by advanced lithography techniques and products containing same by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,042,998. The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (``ID'') (Order No. 13) of the presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ'') terminating the above-captioned investigation on the basis of a settlement agreement.

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has received a complaint entitled ``In Re Certain Flat Panel Digital Televisions and Components Thereof''; the Commission is soliciting comments on any public interest issues raised by the complaint.

The subject five-year review was initiated in May 2010 to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty order on greige polyester/cotton printcloth from China would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. On July 2, 2010, the Department of Commerce published notice that it was revoking the order effective June 27, 2010, ``{b{time} ecause the domestic interested parties did not participate in this sunset review * * * '' (75 FR 38463, July 2, 2010). Accordingly, pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)), the subject review is terminated.

Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on June 10, 2010, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Radiodetection, Ltd. of the United Kingdom. A letter supplementing the complaint was filed on June 29, 2010. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain underground cable and pipe locators by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,268,731. The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.

The Commission has changed the date on which it intends to report its final recommendations to the President in this matter from July 12, 2010, to August 9, 2010, to allow more time to consider the views submitted by Federal agencies and other interested parities.

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined that there is no violation of 19 U.S.C. 1337 by respondents in the above-referenced investigation. The investigation is terminated.

Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to delegate authority to the Secretary to the Commission to publish notice of the receipt of future complaints under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 and to solicit comments relating to the public interest.

Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on June 4, 2010, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Batesville Services, Inc. of Batesville, Indiana. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain caskets by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 5,611,124 (``the `124 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 5,727,291 (``the `291 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 6,836,936 (``the `936 patent''); U.S. Patent No. 6,976,294 (``the `294 patent''); and U.S. Patent No. 7,340,810 (``the `810 patent''). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.

The Commission has prepared and published annual reports in this series under investigation No. 332-345 since 1996. The 2010 report is now available from the Commission online and in CD and printed form. The 2011 report, which the Commission plans to publish in June 2011, will cover cross-border trade for the period ending in 2009 and transactions by affiliates based outside the country of their parent firm for the period ending in 2008. The Commission is inviting interested members of the public to furnish information in connection with the 2011 report.

Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on May 28, 2010, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of S3 Graphics Co., Ltd. of Cayman Islands and S3 Graphics, Inc. of Fremont, California. A letter supplementing the complaint was filed on June 22, 2010. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain electronic devices with image processing systems, components thereof, and associated software by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 7,043,087 (``the `087 patent''); 6,775,417 (``the `417 patent''); 6,683,978 (``the `978 patent''); and 6,658,146 (``the `146 patent''). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.

The Commission hereby gives notice that it has instituted a review pursuant to section 751(c) of the Tariff Act of 1930 (19 U.S.C. 1675(c)) (the Act) to determine whether revocation of the antidumping duty finding on polychloroprene rubber from Japan would be likely to lead to continuation or recurrence of material injury. Pursuant to section 751(c)(2) of the Act, interested parties are requested to respond to this notice by submitting the information specified below to the Commission; \1\ to be assured of consideration, the deadline for responses is August 2, 2010. Comments on the adequacy of responses may be filed with the Commission by September 14, 2010. For further information concerning the conduct of this review and rules of general application, consult the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, part 201, subparts A through E (19 CFR part 201), and part 207, subparts A, D, E, and F (19 CFR part 207), as most recently amended at 74 FR 2847 (January 16, 2009).