International Trade Commission July 30, 2010 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents

In the Matter of Certain Semiconductor Chips Having Synchronous Dynamic Random Access Memory Controllers and Products Containing Same; Notice of Commission Final Determination of Violation of Section 337; Termination of Investigation; Issuance of Limited Exclusion Order and Cease and Desist Orders
Document Number: 2010-18715
Type: Notice
Date: 2010-07-30
Agency: International Trade Commission, Agencies and Commissions
Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined that there is a violation of 19 U.S.C. 1337 in the above-captioned investigation by the respondents in the investigation. To remedy the violation it has found, the Commission has determined to issue a limited exclusion order and to issue cease and desist orders to certain respondents. The investigation is terminated.
Wire Decking From China; Determinations
Document Number: 2010-18714
Type: Notice
Date: 2010-07-30
Agency: International Trade Commission, Agencies and Commissions
In the Matter of Certain Toner Cartridges and Components Thereof; Notice of Investigation
Document Number: 2010-18708
Type: Notice
Date: 2010-07-30
Agency: International Trade Commission, Agencies and Commissions
Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on June 28, 2010, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of Canon Inc., of Japan; Canon U.S.A., Inc. of Lake Success, New York; and Canon Virginia, Inc. of Newport News, Virginia. A letter supplementing the complaint was filed on July 15, 2010. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 based upon the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain toner cartridges and components thereof by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 5,903,803 (``the `803 patent'') and U.S. Patent No. 6,128,454 (``the `454 patent''). The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.