In the Matter of Certain Dynamic Random Access Memory Semiconductors and Products Containing Same, Including Memory Modules; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation as to All Remaining Respondents, 44283 [2010-18528]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 75, No. 144 / Wednesday, July 28, 2010 / Notices information has already been granted such treatment during the proceedings. All such requests should be directed to the Secretary of the Commission and must include a full statement of the reasons why the Commission should grant such treatment. See 19 CFR 201.6. Documents for which confidential treatment is granted by the Commission will be treated accordingly. All nonconfidential written submissions will be available for public inspection at the Office of the Secretary. This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and under sections 210.42–.46 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42–.46). By order of the Commission. Issued: July 22, 2010. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2010–18518 Filed 7–27–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Investigation No. 337–TA–707] In the Matter of Certain Dynamic Random Access Memory Semiconductors and Products Containing Same, Including Memory Modules; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation as to All Remaining Respondents U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review an initial determination (‘‘ID’’) (Order No. 10) of the presiding administrative law judge (‘‘ALJ’’) terminating the above-captioned investigation as to all remaining respondents based on a settlement agreement. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708–2310. Copies of non-confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, sroberts on DSKD5P82C1PROD with NOTICES SUMMARY: VerDate Mar<15>2010 19:05 Jul 27, 2010 Jkt 220001 telephone (202) 205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at http:// edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on March 25, 2010, based on a complaint filed on February 19, 2010, by Infineon Technologies AG of Germany and Infineon Technologies North America Corp. of Milpitas, California (collectively ‘‘complainants’’). 75 FR 14467–68 (March 25, 2010). The complaint, as amended, alleges violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain dynamic random access memory semiconductors and products containing same, including memory modules, by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,480,051; 5,422,309; 5,397,664; and 7,071,074. The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The complaint names numerous respondents including Buffalo Inc. of Japan and Buffalo Technology (USA), Inc. of Austin, Texas (collectively, ‘‘the Buffalo respondents’’). On May 25, 2010, the Commission issued notice of its determination not to review the ALJ’s ID terminating the Buffalo respondents based upon a consent order. On June 18, 2010, complainants and a majority of the remaining respondents moved to terminate the investigation as to all remaining respondents based upon a settlement agreement. The ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 10) on June 29, 2010, granting the joint motion for termination. He found that the motion for termination satisfies Commission rules 210.21(a)(2), (b)(1). He further found, pursuant to Commission rule 210.50(b)(2), that termination of this investigation as to all remaining respondents by settlement agreement is in the public interest. No party petitioned for review of the ID. The Commission has determined not to review the ID. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as PO 00000 Frm 00070 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 44283 amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and in sections 210.21 and 210.42(h) of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.21, 210.42(h). By order of the Commission. Issued: July 22, 2010. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 2010–18528 Filed 7–27–10; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE Notice of Lodging of Consent Decree Under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act Notice is hereby given that on July 22, 2010, a proposed Consent Decree (‘‘Decree’’) in United States v. Champion Chemical Co., et al., Civil Action No. 96cv1521, New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection v. Champion Chemical Co., et al., Civil Action No. 99cv5238, and United States v. Imperial Oil Co., et al., Civil Action No. 07cv1486, was lodged with the United States District Court for the District of New Jersey. The Decree resolves the following claims of the United States: (1) the United States’ Motion to Enforce the Consent Decree, entered in 2001, in United States v. Champion Chemical Co., et al., Civil Action No. 96cv1521, and New Jersey Department of Environmental Protection v. Champion Chemical Co., et al., Civil Action No. 99cv5238; (2) the United States’ claims in United States v. Imperial Oil Co., et al., Civil Action No. 07cv1486; and (3) the United States’ claims, pursuant to the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (‘‘CERCLA’’), 42 U.S.C. 9601, et seq., for recovery of response costs incurred by the United States Environmental Protection Agency (‘‘EPA’’)in connection with the Imperial Oil Company, Inc./ Champion Chemical Company Superfund Site in Marlboro Township, New Jersey (‘‘Site’’). The Decree requires the settling defendants to pay approximately $1.4 million plus all proceeds from (1) the sale of the Site, and (2) the settling defendants’ remaining insurance coverage to the United States to resolve the listed claims. The Department of Justice will receive for a period of thirty (30) days from the date of this publication comments relating to the Decree. Comments should be addressed to the Assistant Attorney General, Environmental and Natural Resources Division, and either e-mailed E:\FR\FM\28JYN1.SGM 28JYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 75, Number 144 (Wednesday, July 28, 2010)]
[Notices]
[Page 44283]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2010-18528]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Investigation No. 337-TA-707]


In the Matter of Certain Dynamic Random Access Memory 
Semiconductors and Products Containing Same, Including Memory Modules; 
Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial 
Determination Terminating the Investigation as to All Remaining 
Respondents

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Notice.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade 
Commission has determined not to review an initial determination 
(``ID'') (Order No. 10) of the presiding administrative law judge 
(``ALJ'') terminating the above-captioned investigation as to all 
remaining respondents based on a settlement agreement.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Clint Gerdine, Esq., Office of the 
General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, 
SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 708-2310. Copies of non-
confidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are 
or will be available for inspection during official business hours 
(8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. 
International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 
20436, telephone (202) 205-2000. General information concerning the 
Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at 
http://www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be 
viewed on the Commission's electronic docket (EDIS) at http://edis.usitc.gov. Hearing-impaired persons are advised that information 
on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission's TDD 
terminal on (202) 205-1810.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation 
on March 25, 2010, based on a complaint filed on February 19, 2010, by 
Infineon Technologies AG of Germany and Infineon Technologies North 
America Corp. of Milpitas, California (collectively ``complainants''). 
75 FR 14467-68 (March 25, 2010). The complaint, as amended, alleges 
violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 
U.S.C. 1337, in the importation into the United States, the sale for 
importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of 
certain dynamic random access memory semiconductors and products 
containing same, including memory modules, by reason of infringement of 
certain claims of U.S. Patent Nos. 5,480,051; 5,422,309; 5,397,664; and 
7,071,074. The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United 
States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. The 
complaint names numerous respondents including Buffalo Inc. of Japan 
and Buffalo Technology (USA), Inc. of Austin, Texas (collectively, 
``the Buffalo respondents'').
    On May 25, 2010, the Commission issued notice of its determination 
not to review the ALJ's ID terminating the Buffalo respondents based 
upon a consent order. On June 18, 2010, complainants and a majority of 
the remaining respondents moved to terminate the investigation as to 
all remaining respondents based upon a settlement agreement.
    The ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 10) on June 29, 2010, 
granting the joint motion for termination. He found that the motion for 
termination satisfies Commission rules 210.21(a)(2), (b)(1). He further 
found, pursuant to Commission rule 210.50(b)(2), that termination of 
this investigation as to all remaining respondents by settlement 
agreement is in the public interest. No party petitioned for review of 
the ID. The Commission has determined not to review the ID.
    The authority for the Commission's determination is contained in 
section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, and 
in sections 210.21 and 210.42(h) of the Commission's Rules of Practice 
and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.21, 210.42(h).

    By order of the Commission.

    Issued: July 22, 2010.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 2010-18528 Filed 7-27-10; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P