International Trade Commission January 6, 2005 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents
Results 1 - 3 of 3
In the Matter of Certain Digital Image Storage and Retrieval Devices; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation on the Basis of a Settlement Agreement
Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge's (``ALJ's'') initial determination (``ID'') granting a joint motion to terminate the above-captioned investigation on the basis of a settlement agreement.
In the Matter of Certain Audio Digital-to-Analog Converters and Products Containing Same; Notice of a Commission Decision To Review and Reverse One Finding of the Administrative Law Judge in a Final Initial Determination; Commission Determination Not To Review the Remainder of the Initial Determination Finding a Violation of Section 337: Schedule for the Filing of Written Submissions on the Issues of Remedy, the Public Interest, and Bonding
Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined to review and reverse a finding contained in the final initial determination (``ID'') issued by the presiding administrative law judge (``ALJ'') in the above-captioned investigation on November 15, 2004. Specifically, the Commission has determined to review and reverse the ID's finding that the '928 patent is unenforceable due to incorrect inventorship in view of a recently issued Certificate of Correction by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO). The Commission has determined not to review the remainder of the ID, thereby finding a violation of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, 19 U.S.C. 1337, in the above-captioned investigation.
In the Matter of Digital Processors, Digital Processing Systems, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Notice of Investigation
Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on December 7, 2004, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of BIAX Corporation of Boulder, Colorado. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain digital processors and digital processing systems, components thereof, and products containing same by reason of infringement of claims 11-13, 26, and 32-33 of U.S. Patent No. 4,487,755, claims 6, 8, 13-14, 28, 33-34, and 36 of U.S. Patent No. 5,021,954, claims 1-3, 9- 21, 23, and 25-30 of U.S. Patent No. 5,517,628, claims 3-9, 11-12, and 16-24 of U.S. Patent No. 6,253,313, and claims 1, 3, 5, 7-8, 10, 13-16, 18, 20-22, and 24-28 of U.S. Patent No. 5,765,037. The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. Complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a permanent exclusion order and permanent cease and desist orders.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.
