In the Matter of Digital Processors, Digital Processing Systems, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Notice of Investigation, 1277-1278 [05-250]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 4 / Thursday, January 6, 2005 / Notices Commission should grant such treatment. See 19 CFR 210.5. Documents for which confidential treatment is granted by the Commission will be treated accordingly. All nonconfidential written submissions will be available for public inspection at the Office of the Secretary. This action is taken under the authority of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and sections 210.42, 210.46, and 210.50 of the Commission’s Interim Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42, 210.46, and 210.50). By order of the Commission. Issued: December 30, 2004. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 05–251 Filed 1–5–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337–TA–520] In the Matter of Certain Digital Image Storage and Retrieval Devices; Notice of a Commission Determination Not To Review an Initial Determination Terminating the Investigation on the Basis of a Settlement Agreement U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that the U.S. International Trade Commission has determined not to review the presiding administrative law judge’s (‘‘ALJ’s’’) initial determination (‘‘ID’’) granting a joint motion to terminate the above-captioned investigation on the basis of a settlement agreement. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Timothy P. Monaghan, Esq., Office of the General Counsel, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–3152. Copies of the public version of the ID and all nonconfidential documents filed in connection with this investigation are or will be available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Washington, DC 20436, telephone (202) 205–2000. Hearingimpaired persons are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on (202) 205–1810. General information concerning the Commission may also be VerDate jul<14>2003 15:45 Jan 05, 2005 Jkt 205001 obtained by accessing its Internet server (https://www.usitc.gov). The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The Commission instituted this investigation on August 16, 2004, based on a complaint filed on behalf of Ampex Corporation, of Redwood City, California (‘‘Ampex’’). 69 FR 50400 (Aug 16, 2004). The complaint alleged violations of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930 in the importation into the United States, sale for importation, and sale within the United States after importation of certain digital image storage and retrieval devices by reason of infringement of certain claims of U.S. Patent No. 4,821,121. The respondent named in the notice of investigation is the Sony Corporation of Tokyo, Japan (‘‘Sony’’). On October 1, 2004, Ampex and Sony entered into a settlement agreement, and on November 24, 2004, Ampex and Sony filed a joint motion to terminate the investigation pursuant to 19 CFR 210.21 based on the settlement agreement. The Commission investigative attorney filed a response in support of the joint motion. On December 9, 2004, the ALJ issued the subject ID (Order No. 6) granting the joint motion of complainant Ampex and respondent Sony to terminate the investigation on the basis of a settlement agreement. The authority for the Commission’s determination is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (19 U.S.C. 1337), and in section 210.42 of the Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure (19 CFR 210.42). Issued: December 30, 2004. By order of the Commission. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary. [FR Doc. 05–252 Filed 1–5–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION [Inv. No. 337–TA–529] In the Matter of Digital Processors, Digital Processing Systems, Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Notice of Investigation U.S. International Trade Commission. ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337. AGENCY: PO 00000 Frm 00058 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 1277 SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the U.S. International Trade Commission on December 7, 2004, under section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of BIAX Corporation of Boulder, Colorado. The complaint alleges violations of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of certain digital processors and digital processing systems, components thereof, and products containing same by reason of infringement of claims 11–13, 26, and 32–33 of U.S. Patent No. 4,487,755, claims 6, 8, 13–14, 28, 33–34, and 36 of U.S. Patent No. 5,021,954, claims 1–3, 9–21, 23, and 25–30 of U.S. Patent No. 5,517,628, claims 3–9, 11–12, and 16–24 of U.S. Patent No. 6,253,313, and claims 1, 3, 5, 7–8, 10, 13–16, 18, 20–22, and 24–28 of U.S. Patent No. 5,765,037. The complaint further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. Complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation and, after the investigation, issue a permanent exclusion order and permanent cease and desist orders. The complaint and its exhibits, except for any confidential information contained therein, are available for inspection during official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202–205–2000. Hearing impaired individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained by contacting the Commission’s TDD terminal on 202– 205–1810. Persons with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 202–205–2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be obtained by accessing its Internet server at https:// www.usitc.gov. The public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission’s electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov. ADDRESSES: FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Benjamin D.M. Wood, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, telephone 202–205–2582. Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, and in section 210.10 of the Commission’s Rules E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM 06JAN1 1278 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 4 / Thursday, January 6, 2005 / Notices of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2004). Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. International Trade Commission, on December 30, 2004, ordered that— (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the sale within the United States after importation of certain digital processors and digital processing systems, components thereof, and products containing same by reason of infringement of one or more of claims 11–13, 26, or 32–33 of U.S. Patent No. 4,487,755, claims 6, 8, 13–14, 28, 33–34, or 36 of U.S. Patent No. 5,021,954, claims 1–3, 9–21, 23, or 25–30 of U.S. Patent No. 5,517,628, claims 3–9, 11–12, or 16–24 of U.S. Patent No. 6,253,313, or claims 1, 3, 5, 7–8, 10, 13–16, 18, 20– 22, or 24–28 of U.S. Patent No. 5,765,037, and whether an industry in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337. (2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of investigation shall be served: (a) The complainant is—BIAX Corporation, 2452 Briarwood Drive, Boulder, Colorado 80305. (b) The respondents are the following companies alleged to be in violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint is to be served: Texas Instruments, Inc., 12500 TI Boulevard, Dallas, Texas 75243–4136; iBiquity Digital Corporation, 8865 Stanford Boulevard, Suite 202, Columbia, Maryland 21045; Kenwood Corporation, 2967–3 Ishikawa-machi, Hachioji-shi, Tokyo, 192–8525, Japan; Kenwood U.S.A. Corporation, 2201 E Dominguez Street, Long Beach, California 90810. (c) Benjamin D.M. Wood, Esq., Office of Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436, who shall be the Commission investigative attorney, party to this investigation; and (3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Sidney Harris is designated as the presiding administrative law judge. A response to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of the VerDate jul<14>2003 16:35 Jan 05, 2005 Jkt 205001 Commission’s Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such response will be considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting the response to the complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless good cause therefor is shown. Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and to enter a final determination containing such findings, and may result in the issuance of a limited exclusion order or cease and desist order or both directed against the respondent. Issued: January 3, 2005. By order of the Commission. Marilyn R. Abbott, Secretary to the Commission. [FR Doc. 05–250 Filed 1–5–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 7020–02–P Contact person for more information: Dave Gamberoni, (301) 415–1651. * * * * * The NRC Commission Meeting Schedule can be found on the Internet at: https://www.nrc.gov/what-we-do/ policy-making/schedule.html. * * * * * The NRC provides reasonable accommodation to individuals with disabilities where appropriate. If you need a reasonable accommodation to participate in these public meetings, or need this meeting notice or the transcript or other information from the public meetings in another format (e.g. braille, large print), please notify the NRC’s Disability Program Coordinator, August Spector, at (301) 415–7080, TDD: (301) 415–2100, or by e-mail at aks@nrc.gov. Determinations on requests for reasonable accommodation will be made on a case-by-case basis. * * * * * This notice is distributed by mail to several hundred subscribers; if you no longer wish to receive it, or would like to be added to the distribution, please contact the Office of the Secretary, Washington, DC 20555 (301) 415–1969. In addition, distribution of this meeting notice over the Internet system is available. If you are interested in receiving this Commission meeting schedule electronically, please send an electronic message to dkw@nrc.gov. Dated: January 3, 2005. Dave Gamberoni, Office of the Secretary. [FR Doc. 05–318 Filed 1–4–05; 9:26 am] NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION Sunshine Act; Meeting BILLING CODE 7590–01–M Week of January 3, 2005. PLACE: Commissioners’ Conference Room, 11555 Rockville Pike, Rockville, Maryland. STATUS: Public. ADDITIONAL MATTERS TO BE CONSIDERED: DATES: Week of January 3, 2005 Wednesday, January 5, 2005 2 p.m. Affirmation Session (Public Meeting) (Tentative). a. Private Fuel Storage (Independent Spent Fuel Storage Installation); Docket No. 72–22–SFSI (Tentative). b. Duke Energy Corp. (Catawba Nuclear Station, Units 1 and 2); Unpublished Board Order (Dec. 17, 2004). (Tentative). c. Motion for Clarification and Amendment of CLI–04–34 (Rene Chun) (Tentative). * The schedule for Commission meetings is subject to change on short notice. To verify the status of meetings call (recording)—(301) 415–1292. PO 00000 Frm 00059 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DEPARTMENT OF STATE [Public Notice 4952] 30-Day Notice of Proposed Information Collection: Form DS–4071, Export Declaration of Defense Technical Data or Services, OMB 1405–0157 Notice of request for public comment and submission to OMB of proposed collection of information. ACTION: SUMMARY: The Department of State has submitted the following information collection request to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for approval in accordance with the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995. • Title of Information Collection: Export Declaration of Defense Technical Data or Services. • OMB Control Number: 1405–0157. • Type of Request: Extension of a Currently Approved Collection. E:\FR\FM\06JAN1.SGM 06JAN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 4 (Thursday, January 6, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 1277-1278]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-250]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION

[Inv. No. 337-TA-529]


In the Matter of Digital Processors, Digital Processing Systems, 
Components Thereof, and Products Containing Same; Notice of 
Investigation

AGENCY: U.S. International Trade Commission.

ACTION: Institution of investigation pursuant to 19 U.S.C. 1337.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: Notice is hereby given that a complaint was filed with the 
U.S. International Trade Commission on December 7, 2004, under section 
337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 19 U.S.C. 1337, on behalf of 
BIAX Corporation of Boulder, Colorado. The complaint alleges violations 
of section 337 in the importation into the United States, the sale for 
importation, and the sale within the United States after importation of 
certain digital processors and digital processing systems, components 
thereof, and products containing same by reason of infringement of 
claims 11-13, 26, and 32-33 of U.S. Patent No. 4,487,755, claims 6, 8, 
13-14, 28, 33-34, and 36 of U.S. Patent No. 5,021,954, claims 1-3, 9-
21, 23, and 25-30 of U.S. Patent No. 5,517,628, claims 3-9, 11-12, and 
16-24 of U.S. Patent No. 6,253,313, and claims 1, 3, 5, 7-8, 10, 13-16, 
18, 20-22, and 24-28 of U.S. Patent No. 5,765,037. The complaint 
further alleges that an industry in the United States exists as 
required by subsection (a)(2) of section 337.
    Complainant requests that the Commission institute an investigation 
and, after the investigation, issue a permanent exclusion order and 
permanent cease and desist orders.

ADDRESSES: The complaint and its exhibits, except for any confidential 
information contained therein, are available for inspection during 
official business hours (8:45 a.m. to 5:15 p.m.) in the Office of the 
Secretary, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., Room 
112, Washington, DC 20436, telephone 202-205-2000. Hearing impaired 
individuals are advised that information on this matter can be obtained 
by contacting the Commission's TDD terminal on 202-205-1810. Persons 
with mobility impairments who will need special assistance in gaining 
access to the Commission should contact the Office of the Secretary at 
202-205-2000. General information concerning the Commission may also be 
obtained by accessing its Internet server at https://www.usitc.gov. The 
public record for this investigation may be viewed on the Commission's 
electronic docket (EDIS) at https://edis.usitc.gov.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Benjamin D.M. Wood, Esq., Office of 
Unfair Import Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 
telephone 202-205-2582.

    Authority: The authority for institution of this investigation 
is contained in section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended, 
and in section 210.10 of the Commission's Rules

[[Page 1278]]

of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.10 (2004).
    Scope of Investigation: Having considered the complaint, the U.S. 
International Trade Commission, on December 30, 2004, ordered that--
    (1) Pursuant to subsection (b) of section 337 of the Tariff Act of 
1930, as amended, an investigation be instituted to determine whether 
there is a violation of subsection (a)(1)(B) of section 337 in the 
importation into the United States, the sale for importation, or the 
sale within the United States after importation of certain digital 
processors and digital processing systems, components thereof, and 
products containing same by reason of infringement of one or more of 
claims 11-13, 26, or 32-33 of U.S. Patent No. 4,487,755, claims 6, 8, 
13-14, 28, 33-34, or 36 of U.S. Patent No. 5,021,954, claims 1-3, 9-21, 
23, or 25-30 of U.S. Patent No. 5,517,628, claims 3-9, 11-12, or 16-24 
of U.S. Patent No. 6,253,313, or claims 1, 3, 5, 7-8, 10, 13-16, 18, 
20-22, or 24-28 of U.S. Patent No. 5,765,037, and whether an industry 
in the United States exists as required by subsection (a)(2) of section 
337.
    (2) For the purpose of the investigation so instituted, the 
following are hereby named as parties upon which this notice of 
investigation shall be served:
    (a) The complainant is--BIAX Corporation, 2452 Briarwood Drive, 
Boulder, Colorado 80305.
    (b) The respondents are the following companies alleged to be in 
violation of section 337, and are the parties upon which the complaint 
is to be served:

Texas Instruments, Inc., 12500 TI Boulevard, Dallas, Texas 75243-4136;
iBiquity Digital Corporation, 8865 Stanford Boulevard, Suite 202, 
Columbia, Maryland 21045;
Kenwood Corporation, 2967-3 Ishikawa-machi, Hachioji-shi, Tokyo, 192-
8525, Japan;
Kenwood U.S.A. Corporation, 2201 E Dominguez Street, Long Beach, 
California 90810.

    (c) Benjamin D.M. Wood, Esq., Office of Unfair Import 
Investigations, U.S. International Trade Commission, 500 E Street, SW., 
Suite 401, Washington, DC 20436, who shall be the Commission 
investigative attorney, party to this investigation; and
    (3) For the investigation so instituted, the Honorable Sidney 
Harris is designated as the presiding administrative law judge.
    A response to the complaint and the notice of investigation must be 
submitted by the named respondents in accordance with section 210.13 of 
the Commission's Rules of Practice and Procedure, 19 CFR 210.13. 
Pursuant to 19 CFR 201.16(d) and 210.13(a), such response will be 
considered by the Commission if received not later than 20 days after 
the date of service by the Commission of the complaint and the notice 
of investigation. Extensions of time for submitting the response to the 
complaint and the notice of investigation will not be granted unless 
good cause therefor is shown.
    Failure of a respondent to file a timely response to each 
allegation in the complaint and in this notice may be deemed to 
constitute a waiver of the right to appear and contest the allegations 
of the complaint and this notice, and to authorize the administrative 
law judge and the Commission, without further notice to the respondent, 
to find the facts to be as alleged in the complaint and this notice and 
to enter a final determination containing such findings, and may result 
in the issuance of a limited exclusion order or cease and desist order 
or both directed against the respondent.

    Issued: January 3, 2005.

    By order of the Commission.
Marilyn R. Abbott,
Secretary to the Commission.
[FR Doc. 05-250 Filed 1-5-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 7020-02-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.