Environmental Protection Agency June 6, 2012 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents

Public Water Supply Supervision Program; Program Revision for the State of Washington
Document Number: 2012-13717
Type: Notice
Date: 2012-06-06
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Notice is hereby given that the State of Washington has revised its approved State Public Water Supply Supervision Primacy Program. Washington has adopted regulations analogous to EPA's Lead and Copper Short-Term Regulatory Revisions and Clarifications Rule. EPA has determined that these revisions are no less stringent than the corresponding federal regulations. Therefore, EPA intends to approve these State program revisions. By approving these rules, EPA does not intend to affect the rights of federally recognized Indian tribes within ``Indian country'' as defined by 18 U.S.C. 1151, nor does it intend to limit existing rights of the State of Washington.
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; South Carolina; 110(a)(1) and (2) Infrastructure Requirements for the 1997 and 2006 Fine Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards
Document Number: 2012-13716
Type: Proposed Rule
Date: 2012-06-06
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
EPA is proposing to approve the State Implementation Plans (SIP), submitted by the State of South Carolina, through the Department of Health and Environmental Control (DHEC), as demonstrating that the State meets the requirements of sections 110(a)(1) and (2) of the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act) for the 1997 annual and 2006 24-hour fine particulate matter (PM2.5) national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS). Section 110(a) of the CAA requires that each state adopt and submit a SIP for the implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of each NAAQS promulgated by the EPA, which is commonly referred to as an ``infrastructure'' SIP. South Carolina certified that the South Carolina SIP contains provisions that ensure the 1997 annual and 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS is implemented, enforced, and maintained in South Carolina (hereafter referred to as ``infrastructure submission''). South Carolina's infrastructure submissions, provided to EPA on March 14, 2008, and on September 18, 2009, addressed all the required infrastructure elements for the 1997 annual and 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS with the exception of section 110(a)(2)(E)(ii) and 110(a)(2)(G) which were submitted by South Carolina on April 3, 2012. South Carolina's April 3, 2012, submittal is being addressed in a separate action.
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans and Designations of Areas for Air Quality Planning Purposes; Tennessee: Knoxville; Determination of Attaining Data for the 1997 Annual Fine Particulate Matter Standards and 2006 24-Hour Fine Particulate Standards
Document Number: 2012-13715
Type: Proposed Rule
Date: 2012-06-06
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
EPA is proposing to make two determinations, one regarding the Knoxville, Tennessee, 1997 annual fine particulate (PM2.5) nonattainment area and one regarding the Knoxville-Sevierville-La Follette, Tennessee, 2006 24-hour PM2.5 nonattainment area (both areas have the same geographic boundary and will hereafter be collectively referred to as the ``Knoxville Area'' or ``Area''). First, EPA is proposing to determine that the Area has attained the 1997 annual average PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS or ``standard''). Second, EPA is proposing to determine that the area has attained the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. These proposed determinations of attaining data are based upon complete, quality-assured and certified ambient air monitoring data for the 2009- 2011 period, showing that the Area has monitored attainment of the 1997 annual PM2.5 NAAQS and 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. If EPA finalizes these proposed determinations of attaining data, the requirements for the Area to submit attainment demonstrations and associated reasonably available control measures (RACM), reasonable further progress (RFP) plans, contingency measures, and other planning state implementation plan (SIP) revisions related to attainment of the standards shall be suspended so long as the Area continues to attain the respective PM2.5 NAAQS.
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; South Carolina; 110(a)(1) and (2)(E) and (G) Infrastructure Requirements for the 1997 and 2006 Fine Particulate Matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards
Document Number: 2012-13714
Type: Proposed Rule
Date: 2012-06-06
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
EPA is proposing to approve a revision to the South Carolina State Implementation Plan (SIP), submitted by the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SC DHEC), on April 3, 2012, pertaining to Clean Air Act (CAA) Section 110(a)(2)(E) and (G) for the 1997 annual and 2006 24-hour fine particulate matter National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS). EPA is also proposing to approve portions of a certification submission provided by SC DHEC on March 14, 2008, to address CAA section 110(a)(1) and (2) requirements for the 1997 annual fine particulate matter (PM2.5) NAAQS, as well as portions of a certification submission provided on September 18, 2009, to address CAA section 110(a)(1) and (2) requirements for the 2006 24-hour PM2.5 NAAQS. Specifically, EPA is proposing action on two separate but related requirements addressed in South Carolina's April 3, 2012, SIP revision, and two previous certifications. First, South Carolina's SIP revision addresses the CAA section 128 requirements. Second, South Carolina's March 14, 2008, and September 18, 2009, certification submissions (as clarified in a letter on November 9, 2009), and the State's April 3, 2012, SIP revision were submitted to address sections 110(a)(2)(E)(ii) and 110(a)(2)(G), of the CAA for both the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS. Section 110(a) of the CAA requires that each state adopt and submit a SIP for the implementation, maintenance, and enforcement of each NAAQS promulgated by EPA, which is commonly referred to as an ``infrastructure'' SIP. SC DHEC certified that the South Carolina SIP contains provisions that ensure the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS are implemented, enforced, and maintained in South Carolina (hereafter referred to as ``infrastructure submission''). South Carolina's infrastructure submissions, provided to EPA on April 3, 2012, March 14, 2008, and September 18, 2009 (as clarified in a letter on November 3, 2009), as a whole, addressed the required infrastructure elements for the 1997 and 2006 PM2.5 NAAQS, however the subject of this notice is limited to infrastructure elements 110(a)(2)(E)(ii) and 110(a)(2)(G). All other applicable South Carolina infrastructure elements will be addressed in a separate rulemaking.
Adequacy Status: South Carolina: Reasonable Further Progress Plan Motor Vehicle Emissions Budget for Transportation Conformity for the Portion of York County, South Carolina Within Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, North Carolina-South Carolina; 1997 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area
Document Number: 2012-13697
Type: Notice
Date: 2012-06-06
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
In this notice, EPA is notifying the public of its finding that the volatile organic compounds (VOC) motor vehicle emissions budget (MVEB) for the portion of York County, South Carolina that is within the Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, North Carolina-South Carolina Area (hereafter referred to as the ``Charlotte bi-state Area'') Reasonable Further Progress (RFP) plan for the 1997 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS), submitted on August 31, 2007, and supplemented on April 29, 2010, by the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SC DHEC) are adequate for transportation conformity purposes. The South Carolina portion of the Charlotte bi-state Area is comprised of a portion of York County, South Carolina. On March 2, 1999, the District of Columbia Circuit Court ruled that submitted state implementation plans (SIPs) cannot be used for transportation conformity determinations until EPA has affirmatively found them adequate. As a result of EPA's finding, the South Carolina portion of the Charlotte bi-state Area must use the VOC MVEB from the submitted RFP plan supplement for the Area for future conformity determinations.
Approval and Promulgation of Implementation Plans; Kentucky; Approval of Revisions to the Jefferson County Portion of the Kentucky SIP; New Source Review; Prevention of Significant Deterioration
Document Number: 2012-13694
Type: Proposed Rule
Date: 2012-06-06
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
EPA is proposing to approve multiple revisions to the Jefferson County portion of the Kentucky State Implementation Plan (SIP), submitted by the Commonwealth of Kentucky, through the Kentucky Division for Air Quality (KDAQ), to EPA in two submittals dated June 1, 2009, and February 8, 2011. These proposed revisions were submitted by KDAQ on behalf of the Louisville Metro Air Pollution Control District (LMAPCD), (also referred to as Jefferson County) and modifies the LMAPCD New Source Review (NSR) Prevention of Significant Deterioration (PSD) permitting regulations. The proposed revisions incorporate by reference (IBR) federal NSR PSD requirements promulgated in the Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Tailoring Rule (hereafter referred to as the ``GHG Tailoring Rule''), requirements for the fine particulate matter (also known as PM2.5) national ambient air quality standards (NAAQS) as amended in EPA's 2008 NSR PM2.5 Implementation Rule (hereafter referred to as the ``NSR PM2.5 Rule''), the 1997 8-Hour Ozone NAAQS Implementation Rule NSR Update Phase II (hereafter referred to as the ``Phase II Rule''), and the 2002 NSR Reform Rule, into the Jefferson County portion of the Kentucky SIP. EPA is proposing approval of Jefferson County's June 1, 2009, and February 8, 2011, SIP revisions because the Agency has determined that these SIP revisions are in accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA or Act) and EPA regulations regarding the PSD permitting program.
Bacillus mycoides isolate J; Receipt of Application for Emergency Exemption for Use on Potato in Montana, Solicitation of Public Comment
Document Number: 2012-13348
Type: Notice
Date: 2012-06-06
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
EPA has received a specific exemption request from the Montana Department of Agriculture to use the pesticide Bacillus mycoides isolate J to treat up to 2,675 acres of potato to control Potato Virus Y (PVY). The applicant proposes the use of a new chemical which has not been registered by the EPA. EPA is soliciting public comment before making the decision whether or not to grant the exemption.
Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Alternative for the Motor Vehicle Air Conditioning Sector Under the Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) Program
Document Number: 2012-13189
Type: Rule
Date: 2012-06-06
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Pursuant to the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA)'s Significant New Alternatives Policy (SNAP) program, this action lists carbon dioxide (CO2) or R-744, as acceptable substitute, subject to use conditions, in the motor vehicle air conditioning (MVAC) end-use for motor vehicles (i.e., passenger cars, light-duty and heavy- duty vehicles) within the refrigeration and air-conditioning sector. This final rule only concerns the use of CO2 in MVAC systems designed specifically for the use of CO2 refrigerant. The substitute is non-ozone-depleting and therefore does not contribute to stratospheric ozone depletion.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.