Adequacy Status: South Carolina: Reasonable Further Progress Plan Motor Vehicle Emissions Budget for Transportation Conformity for the Portion of York County, South Carolina Within Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, North Carolina-South Carolina; 1997 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area, 33454-33455 [2012-13697]

Download as PDF 33454 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 109 / Wednesday, June 6, 2012 / Notices Petroleum Supply Annual, and Natural Gas Annual; (5) Annual Estimated Number of Total Responses: Forms EIA–23L/23S/64A: 1,701; (6) Annual Estimated Number of Burden Hours: Form EIA–23L Annual Survey of Domestic Oil and Gas Reserves, Field Level Report: 32 hours (intermediatesize operators); 160 hours (large operators); Form EIA–23S Annual Survey of Domestic Oil and Gas Reserves, Summary Level Report: 4 hours (small operators); Form EIA–64A Annual Report of the Origin of Natural Gas Liquids Production: 6 hours (natural gas plant operators); (7) Annual Estimated Reporting and Recordkeeping Cost Burden: Forms EIA–23L/23S/64A: Zero. Statutory Authority: Section 13(b) of the Federal Energy Administration Act of 1974, Public Law 93–275, codified at 15 U.S.C. 772(b) and Section 657 of the Department of Energy Organization Act, Public Law 95–91. Issued in Washington, DC, May 30, 2012. Renee Miller, Acting Director, Office of Survey Development and Statistical Integration, U.S. Energy Information Administration. [FR Doc. 2012–13668 Filed 6–5–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6450–01–P DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY Federal Energy Regulatory Commission mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES Combined Notice of Filings #1 Take notice that the Commission received the following electric rate filings: Docket Numbers: ER10–2507–001; ER98–2157–022. Applicants: Westar Energy, Inc., Kansas Gas and Electric Company. Description: Notice of Change in Status of Westar Energy, Inc., et al. Filed Date: 5/29/12. Accession Number: 20120529–5225. Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/19/12. Docket Numbers: ER12–761–003. Applicants: MATL LLP. Description: Compliance Filing to be effective 9/30/2010. Filed Date: 5/29/12. Accession Number: 20120529–5198. Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/19/12. Docket Numbers: ER12–1524–000. Applicants: Kleantricity, Inc. Description: Additional Information of Kleantricity, Inc. Filed Date: 5/29/12. Accession Number: 20120529–5171. VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:24 Jun 05, 2012 Jkt 226001 Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/19/12. Docket Numbers: ER12–1769–001. Applicants: Viridian Energy NG, LLC. Description: Market-Based Rate Tariff to be effective 7/1/2012. Filed Date: 5/29/12. Accession Number: 20120529–5138. Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/19/12. Docket Numbers: ER12–1836–001. Applicants: Louisville Gas and Electric Company. Description: EKPC NITSA Errata to be effective 5/25/2012. Filed Date: 5/29/12. Accession Number: 20120529–5141. Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/19/12. Docket Numbers: ER12–1860–000. Applicants: PacifiCorp. Description: UAMPS ARTSOA Revised to be effective 6/2/2012. Filed Date: 5/29/12. Accession Number: 20120529–5143. Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/19/12. Docket Numbers: ER12–1861–000. Applicants: PJM Interconnection, LLC. Description: Original Service Agreement No. 3320; Queue No. X3–043 to be effective 5/2/2012. Filed Date: 5/29/12. Accession Number: 20120529–5158. Comments Due: 5 p.m. ET 6/19/12. The filings are accessible in the Commission’s eLibrary system by clicking on the links or querying the docket number. Any person desiring to intervene or protest in any of the above proceedings must file in accordance with Rules 211 and 214 of the Commission’s Regulations (18 CFR 385.211 and 385.214) on or before 5 p.m. Eastern time on the specified comment date. Protests may be considered, but intervention is necessary to become a party to the proceeding. eFiling is encouraged. More detailed information relating to filing requirements, interventions, protests, service, and qualifying facilities filings can be found at: https://www.ferc.gov/ docs-filing/efiling/filing-req.pdf. For other information, call (866) 208–3676 (toll free). For TTY, call (202) 502–8659. Dated: May 30, 2012. Nathaniel J. Davis, Sr., Deputy Secretary. [FR Doc. 2012–13706 Filed 6–5–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6717–01–P PO 00000 Frm 00067 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [EPA–R04–OAR–2010–0017: FRL–9682–6] Adequacy Status: South Carolina: Reasonable Further Progress Plan Motor Vehicle Emissions Budget for Transportation Conformity for the Portion of York County, South Carolina Within Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, North Carolina-South Carolina; 1997 8Hour Ozone Nonattainment Area Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice of adequacy. AGENCY: In this notice, EPA is notifying the public of its finding that the volatile organic compounds (VOC) motor vehicle emissions budget (MVEB) for the portion of York County, South Carolina that is within the CharlotteGastonia-Rock Hill, North CarolinaSouth Carolina Area (hereafter referred to as the ‘‘Charlotte bi-state Area’’) Reasonable Further Progress (RFP) plan for the 1997 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS), submitted on August 31, 2007, and supplemented on April 29, 2010, by the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SC DHEC) are adequate for transportation conformity purposes. The South Carolina portion of the Charlotte bi-state Area is comprised of a portion of York County, South Carolina. On March 2, 1999, the District of Columbia Circuit Court ruled that submitted state implementation plans (SIPs) cannot be used for transportation conformity determinations until EPA has affirmatively found them adequate. As a result of EPA’s finding, the South Carolina portion of the Charlotte bi-state Area must use the VOC MVEB from the submitted RFP plan supplement for the Area for future conformity determinations. DATES: This adequacy finding for VOC is effective June 21, 2012. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kelly Sheckler, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Region 4, Air Planning Branch, Air Quality Modeling and Transportation Section, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 30303. Ms. Sheckler can also be reached by telephone at (404) 562–9222, or via electronic mail at sheckler.kelly@epa.gov. The finding is available at EPA’s conformity Web site: https://www.epa.gov/otaq/ stateresources/transconf/adequacy.htm SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Today’s notice is simply an announcement of findings that EPA has already made. SUMMARY: E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM 06JNN1 Federal Register / Vol. 77, No. 109 / Wednesday, June 6, 2012 / Notices EPA Region 4 sent a letter to SC DHEC on May 25, 2012, stating that the 2008 VOC MVEB in the 1997 8-hour ozone RFP plan for the South Carolina portion of the Charlotte bi-state Area, dated August 31, 2007, and supplemented on April 29, 2010, are adequate. EPA posted the availability of the York County MVEB on EPA’s Web site on May 13, 2010, as part of the adequacy process, for the purpose of soliciting comments. The comment period ran from May 13, 2010, through June 14, 2010. EPA’s findings have also been announced on EPA’s conformity Web site: https://www.epa.gov/otaq/ stateresources/index.htm, (once there, click ‘‘Transportation Conformity’’ text icon, then look for ‘‘Adequacy Review of SIP Submissions’’). The adequate VOC MVEB is provided in the following table: (See 69 FR 40004). Please note that an adequacy review is separate from the EPA’s completeness review, and it also should not be used to prejudge EPA’s ultimate approval of the SIP. Even if EPA finds the MVEB adequate, the Agency may later disapprove the SIP. Within 24 months from the effective date of this notice, the transportation partners will need to demonstrate conformity to the new MVEB if the demonstration has not already been made, pursuant to 40 CFR 93.104(e). See 73 FR 4419 (January 24, 2008). Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: May 29, 2012. A. Stanley Meiburg, Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4. [FR Doc. 2012–13697 Filed 6–5–12; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P YORK COUNTY, SOUTH CAROLINA 8-HR ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY OZONE VOC MVEB [EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0397; FRL–9351–2] 2008 2008 York County ( partial county) VOC MVEB mstockstill on DSK4VPTVN1PROD with NOTICES VOC 6.053 tons per day. 5,493 kilograms per day Transportation conformity is required by section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990. EPA’s conformity rule, 40 CFR part 93, requires that transportation plans, programs and projects conform to state air quality implementation plans and establishes the criteria and procedures for determining whether or not they do. Conformity to a SIP means that transportation activities will not produce new air quality violations, worsen existing violations, or delay timely attainment of the NAAQS. The criteria by which EPA determines whether a SIP’s MVEB are adequate for transportation conformity purposes are outlined in 40 CFR 93.118(e) (4). EPA has described the process for determining the adequacy of submitted SIP budgets in a May 14, 1999, memorandum entitled ‘‘Conformity Guidance on Implementation of March 2, 1999 Conformity Court Decision.’’ EPA has followed this guidance in making this adequacy determination. This guidance is incorporated into EPA’s July 1, 2004, final rulemaking entitled ‘‘Transportation Conformity Rule Amendments for the New 8-hour Ozone and PM2.5 National Ambient Air Quality Standards and Miscellaneous Revisions for Existing Areas; Transportation Conformity Rule Amendments: Response to Court Decision and Additional Rule Changes’’ VerDate Mar<15>2010 17:24 Jun 05, 2012 Jkt 226001 Bacillus mycoides isolate J; Receipt of Application for Emergency Exemption for Use on Potato in Montana, Solicitation of Public Comment Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: EPA has received a specific exemption request from the Montana Department of Agriculture to use the pesticide Bacillus mycoides isolate J to treat up to 2,675 acres of potato to control Potato Virus Y (PVY). The applicant proposes the use of a new chemical which has not been registered by the EPA. EPA is soliciting public comment before making the decision whether or not to grant the exemption. DATES: Comments must be received on or before June 11, 2012. ADDRESSES: Submit your comments, identified by docket identification (ID) number EPA–HQ–OPP–2012–0397 by one of the following methods: Federal eRulemaking Portal: https:// www.regulations.gov. Follow the online instructions for submitting comments. Do not submit electronically any information you consider to be Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. • Mail: OPP Docket, Environmental Protection Agency Docket Center (EPA/ DC), Mail Code: 28221T, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001. Hand Delivery: To make special arrangements for hand delivery or delivery of boxed information, please SUMMARY: PO 00000 Frm 00068 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 33455 follow the instructions at https://www. epa.gov/dockets/contacts.htm. Additional instructions on commenting or visiting the docket, along with more information about dockets generally, is available at https://www.epa.gov/ dockets. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Debra Rate, Registration Division (7505P), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave. NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone number: (703) 306–0309; fax number: (703) 605– 0781; email address: rate.debra@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. General Information A. Does this Action Apply to Me? You may be potentially affected by this action if you are an agricultural producer, food manufacturer, or pesticide manufacturer. Potentially affected entities may include, but are not limited to: • Crop production (NAICS code 111). • Animal production (NAICS code 112). • Food manufacturing (NAICS code 311). • Pesticide manufacturing (NAICS code 32532). This listing is not intended to be exhaustive, but rather provides a guide for readers regarding entities likely to be affected by this action. Other types of entities not listed in this unit could also be affected. The North American Industrial Classification System (NAICS) codes have been provided to assist you and others in determining whether this action might apply to certain entities. If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. B. What Should I Consider as I Prepare My Comments for EPA? 1. Submitting CBI. Do not submit this information to EPA through www.regulations.gov or email. Clearly mark the part or all of the information that you claim to be CBI. For CBI information in a disk or CD–ROM that you mail to EPA, mark the outside of the disk or CD–ROM as CBI and then identify electronically within the disk or CD–ROM the specific information that is claimed as CBI. In addition to one complete version of the comment that includes information claimed as CBI, a copy of the comment that does not contain the information claimed as CBI must be submitted for inclusion in the public docket. Information so marked E:\FR\FM\06JNN1.SGM 06JNN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 77, Number 109 (Wednesday, June 6, 2012)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33454-33455]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2012-13697]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[EPA-R04-OAR-2010-0017: FRL-9682-6]


Adequacy Status: South Carolina: Reasonable Further Progress Plan 
Motor Vehicle Emissions Budget for Transportation Conformity for the 
Portion of York County, South Carolina Within Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock 
Hill, North Carolina-South Carolina; 1997 8-Hour Ozone Nonattainment 
Area

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of adequacy.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In this notice, EPA is notifying the public of its finding 
that the volatile organic compounds (VOC) motor vehicle emissions 
budget (MVEB) for the portion of York County, South Carolina that is 
within the Charlotte-Gastonia-Rock Hill, North Carolina-South Carolina 
Area (hereafter referred to as the ``Charlotte bi-state Area'') 
Reasonable Further Progress (RFP) plan for the 1997 8-hour ozone 
National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS), submitted on August 31, 
2007, and supplemented on April 29, 2010, by the South Carolina 
Department of Health and Environmental Control (SC DHEC) are adequate 
for transportation conformity purposes. The South Carolina portion of 
the Charlotte bi-state Area is comprised of a portion of York County, 
South Carolina. On March 2, 1999, the District of Columbia Circuit 
Court ruled that submitted state implementation plans (SIPs) cannot be 
used for transportation conformity determinations until EPA has 
affirmatively found them adequate. As a result of EPA's finding, the 
South Carolina portion of the Charlotte bi-state Area must use the VOC 
MVEB from the submitted RFP plan supplement for the Area for future 
conformity determinations.

DATES: This adequacy finding for VOC is effective June 21, 2012.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Kelly Sheckler, U.S. Environmental 
Protection Agency, Region 4, Air Planning Branch, Air Quality Modeling 
and Transportation Section, 61 Forsyth Street SW., Atlanta, Georgia 
30303. Ms. Sheckler can also be reached by telephone at (404) 562-9222, 
or via electronic mail at sheckler.kelly@epa.gov. The finding is 
available at EPA's conformity Web site: https://www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/transconf/adequacy.htm

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Today's notice is simply an announcement of 
findings that EPA has already made.

[[Page 33455]]

EPA Region 4 sent a letter to SC DHEC on May 25, 2012, stating that the 
2008 VOC MVEB in the 1997 8-hour ozone RFP plan for the South Carolina 
portion of the Charlotte bi-state Area, dated August 31, 2007, and 
supplemented on April 29, 2010, are adequate. EPA posted the 
availability of the York County MVEB on EPA's Web site on May 13, 2010, 
as part of the adequacy process, for the purpose of soliciting 
comments. The comment period ran from May 13, 2010, through June 14, 
2010. EPA's findings have also been announced on EPA's conformity Web 
site: https://www.epa.gov/otaq/stateresources/index.htm, (once there, 
click ``Transportation Conformity'' text icon, then look for ``Adequacy 
Review of SIP Submissions''). The adequate VOC MVEB is provided in the 
following table:

             York County, South Carolina 8-hr Ozone VOC MVEB
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                              2008                        2008
------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 York County ( partial county) VOC MVEB
------------------------------------------------------------------------
VOC..............  6.053 tons per day........  5,493 kilograms per day
------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Transportation conformity is required by section 176(c) of the 
Clean Air Act, as amended in 1990. EPA's conformity rule, 40 CFR part 
93, requires that transportation plans, programs and projects conform 
to state air quality implementation plans and establishes the criteria 
and procedures for determining whether or not they do. Conformity to a 
SIP means that transportation activities will not produce new air 
quality violations, worsen existing violations, or delay timely 
attainment of the NAAQS.
    The criteria by which EPA determines whether a SIP's MVEB are 
adequate for transportation conformity purposes are outlined in 40 CFR 
93.118(e) (4). EPA has described the process for determining the 
adequacy of submitted SIP budgets in a May 14, 1999, memorandum 
entitled ``Conformity Guidance on Implementation of March 2, 1999 
Conformity Court Decision.'' EPA has followed this guidance in making 
this adequacy determination. This guidance is incorporated into EPA's 
July 1, 2004, final rulemaking entitled ``Transportation Conformity 
Rule Amendments for the New 8-hour Ozone and PM2.5 National 
Ambient Air Quality Standards and Miscellaneous Revisions for Existing 
Areas; Transportation Conformity
    Rule Amendments: Response to Court Decision and Additional Rule 
Changes'' (See 69 FR 40004). Please note that an adequacy review is 
separate from the EPA's completeness review, and it also should not be 
used to prejudge EPA's ultimate approval of the SIP. Even if EPA finds 
the MVEB adequate, the Agency may later disapprove the SIP.
    Within 24 months from the effective date of this notice, the 
transportation partners will need to demonstrate conformity to the new 
MVEB if the demonstration has not already been made, pursuant to 40 CFR 
93.104(e). See 73 FR 4419 (January 24, 2008).

    Authority:  42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: May 29, 2012.
A. Stanley Meiburg,
Acting Regional Administrator, Region 4.
[FR Doc. 2012-13697 Filed 6-5-12; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.