Environmental Protection Agency March 10, 2006 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents

Perfluoroalkyl Sulfonates; Proposed Significant New Use Rule
Document Number: E6-3444
Type: Proposed Rule
Date: 2006-03-10
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
EPA is proposing to amend a significant new use rule (SNUR) under section 5(a)(2) of the Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) to include certain perfluoroalkyl sulfonates (PFAS) substances. EPA is proposing to amend the PFAS SNUR at 40 CFR 721.9582 by adding a new Table 3 containing the remaining PFAS chemicals on the TSCA Inventory that are not already regulated by the SNUR. This proposed rule would require manufacturers, including importers, to notify EPA at least 90 days before commencing the manufacture or import of the PFAS chemicals listed in Table 3 of the regulatory text proposed herein for the significant new uses described in this document on or after April 10, 2006. EPA believes that this action is necessary because these chemical substances may be hazardous to human health and the environment. The required notice will provide EPA the opportunity to evaluate intended significant new uses and associated activities before they occur and, if necessary, to prohibit or limit those uses or activities.
Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments
Document Number: E6-3443
Type: Notice
Date: 2006-03-10
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
EPA expressed environmental concern about potential impacts to wetlands, and requested additional information to address wetland impacts and required mitigation. Rating EC2.
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Texas; Control of Air Pollution by Permits for New Construction or Modification
Document Number: 06-2317
Type: Rule
Date: 2006-03-10
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
EPA is taking direct final action to approve revisions to the Texas State Implementation Plan (SIP). This action approves provisions for alternate language public notice for certain preconstruction permits or permit renewals and provisions for preconstruction permit renewals. It approves SIP revisions that Texas submitted to EPA on August 31, 1993; April 29, 1994; August 17, 1994; and July 22, 1998. The provisions that EPA is approving supplement the current requirements for new construction and modifications and are more stringent than the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act) and EPA regulations. We are approving the revisions under sections 110 and 116 of the Act.
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Texas; Control of Air Pollution by Permits for New Construction or Modification
Document Number: 06-2316
Type: Proposed Rule
Date: 2006-03-10
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Texas State Implementation Plan (SIP). This action approves provisions for alternate language public notice for certain preconstruction permits or permit renewals and provisions for preconstruction permit renewals. It approves SIP revisions that Texas submitted to EPA on August 31, 1993; April 29, 1994; August 17, 1994; and July 22, 1998. The revisions that EPA is approving supplement the current requirements for new construction and modifications and are more stringent than the Federal Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act) and EPA regulations. We are approving the revisions under sections 110 and 116 of the Act as improving the existing SIP.
Environmental Impacts Statements; Notice of Availability
Document Number: 06-2314
Type: Notice
Date: 2006-03-10
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Notice of Filing of a Pesticide Petition for the Establishment of a Regulation for the Residues of Dimethomorph in or on Brassica Head and Stem Food Commodities
Document Number: 06-2241
Type: Notice
Date: 2006-03-10
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
This notice announces the initial filing of a pesticide petition proposing the establishment of a regulation for residues of the fungicide dimethomorph [(E,Z)4-[3-(4-chlorophenyl)-3-(3,4- dimethoxyphenyl)-1-oxo-2-propenyl]-morpholine] in or on Brassica head and stem (Subgroup 5A) food commodities.
The Treatment of Data Influenced by Exceptional Events
Document Number: 06-2179
Type: Proposed Rule
Date: 2006-03-10
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
Today, EPA is proposing a rule to govern the review and handling of air quality monitoring data influenced by exceptional events. Exceptional events are events for which the normal planning and regulatory process established by the Clean Air Act (CAA) is not appropriate. In this rulemaking action, EPA is proposing to: Implement section 319(b)(3)(B) and section 107(d)(3) authority to exclude air quality monitoring data from regulatory determinations related to exceedances or violations of the National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS) and avoid designating an area as nonattainment, redesignating an area as nonattainment, or reclassifying an existing nonattainment area to a higher classification if a State adequately demonstrates that an exceptional event has caused an exceedance or violation of a NAAQS. Also, EPA is proposing four options with respect to whether, and to what extent, States should be required to take additional actions to address public health impacts related to the event.
PM2.5
Document Number: 06-2178
Type: Rule
Date: 2006-03-10
Agency: Environmental Protection Agency
This final rule establishes the criteria for determining which transportation projects must be analyzed for local particle emissions impacts in PM2.5 and PM10 nonattainment and maintenance areas. This rule establishes requirements in PM2.5 areas and revises existing requirements in PM10 areas. If required, an analysis of local particle emissions impacts is done as part of a transportation project's conformity determination. EPA is requiring a local particle emissions impacts analysis for certain transportation projects to ensure that these projects do not adversely impact the national ambient air quality standards and human health. The Clean Air Act requires federally supported highway and transit projects to be consistent with (``conform to'') the purpose of a state air quality implementation plan. EPA has consulted with the Department of Transportation (DOT) on the development of this final rule, and DOT concurs with its content.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.