Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments, 12355-12356 [E6-3443]

Download as PDF Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 47 / Friday, March 10, 2006 / Notices Rate Schedule PJM–2 Available to public bodies and cooperatives in Virginia and North Carolina to whom power may be transmitted pursuant to contracts between the Government and PJM. The customer is responsible for providing a scheduling arrangement with the Government. Rate Schedule PJM–3 Available to public bodies and cooperatives in Virginia and North Carolina to whom power may be scheduled pursuant to contracts between the Government and PJM. The customer is responsible for providing a transmission arrangement. Rate Schedule PJM–4 Available to public bodies and cooperatives in the service area of PJM. The customer is responsible for providing a scheduling arrangement with the Government and for providing a transmission arrangement. Rate Schedule CP&L–1–A Available to public bodies and cooperatives in North Carolina to whom power may be transmitted and scheduled pursuant to contracts between the Government and Carolina Power & Light. Rate Schedule CP&L–2–A Available to public bodies and cooperatives in North Carolina to whom power may be transmitted pursuant to contracts between the Government and Carolina Power & Light. The customer is responsible for providing a scheduling arrangement with the Government. Rate Schedule CP&L–3–A Available to public bodies and cooperatives in North Carolina to whom power may be scheduled pursuant to contracts between the Government and Carolina Power & Light. The customer is responsible for providing a transmission arrangement. dsatterwhite on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL Rate Schedule CP&L–4–A Available to public bodies and cooperatives in the service area of Carolina Power & Light. The customer is responsible for providing a scheduling arrangement with the Government and for providing a transmission arrangement. Rate Schedule NC–1–A Available to public bodies and cooperatives in Virginia and North Carolina to whom power may be transmitted pursuant to a contract between the Government and PJM and scheduled pursuant to a contract VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:31 Mar 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 between the Government and Carolina Power & Light. Rate Schedule Replacement-2 This rate schedule shall be applicable to the sale energy purchased to meet contract minimum energy and sold under appropriate contracts between the Government and the Customer. The referenced repayment studies are available for examination at 1166 Athens Tech Road, Elberton, GA 30635. Proposed Rate Schedules PJM–1, PJM– 2, PJM–3, PJM–4, CP&L–1–A, CP&L–2– A, CP&L–3–A, CP&L–4–A, NC–1–A, and Replacement-2 are also available. Dated: February 27, 2006. Charles A. Borchardt, Administrator. [FR Doc. E6–3455 Filed 3–9–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6450–01–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ER–FRL–6673–2] Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of EPA Comments Availability of EPA comments prepared pursuant to the Environmental Review Process (ERP), under section 309 of the Clean Air Act and section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended. Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of Federal Activities at 202–564–7167. An explanation of the ratings assigned to draft environmental impact statements (EISs) was published in FR dated April 1, 2005 (70 FR 16815). Draft EISs EIS No. 20050501, ERP No. D–NRS– G39045–AR, Walnut Bayou Irrigation Project, Natural Resource Plan for the Little Red River Watershed, Little River County, AR. Summary: EPA expressed environmental concern about potential impacts to wetlands, and requested additional information to address wetland impacts and required mitigation. Rating EC2. EIS No. 20050518, ERP No. D–BLM– J02049–WY, Atlantic Rim Natural Gas Field Development Project, Proposed Natural Gas Development to 2000 Wells, 1800 to Coal Beds and 200 to Other Formations, Carbon County, WY. Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about air and water/wetland impacts, and requested PO 00000 Frm 00023 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 12355 additional information on these issues and mitigation. Rating EC2. EIS No. 20050520, ERP No. D–BIA– L61230–OR, Coyote Business Park, Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, Proposes to Develop, Build and Manage a Light Industrial Commercial Business Park, Umatilla County, OR. Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about surface and ground water quality impact, and suggests that the use of low input development strategies could help reduce those impacts. Rating EC1. EIS No. 20050535, ERP No. D–BIA– L03012–AK, Cordova Oil Spill Response Facility, Construct an Oil Spill Response Facility at Shepard Point, NPDES Permit and U.S. Army COE Section 10 and 404 Permits, Cordova, AK. Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about impacts to rocky shoreline habitat and special aquatic resources (eelgrass beds). Rating EC2. EIS No. 20050543, ERP No. D–NPS– D61058–VA, Manassas National Battlefield Park General Management Plan, Implementation, Fairfax and Prince William Counties, VA. Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about wetland, vegetation wildlife, transportation, and the local community impacts, and requested additional forest and wetland mitigation and additional information on the impacts of closing U.S. Route 29 and VA Route 234 within Manassas National Battlefield Park. Rating EC2. EIS No. 20050551, ERP No. D–NAS– A12044–00, Programmatic— Development of Advanced Radioisotope Power Systems, Two New Advanced RPS’s: Multi-Mission Radioisotope Thermoelectric Generator (MMRTG) and Stirling Radioisotope Generator (SRG). Summary: EPA does not object to the proposed action. Rating LO. EIS No. 20050552, ERP No. D–FRC– E03014–FL, Cypress Pipeline Project and Phase VII Expansion Project, Construction and Operation, U.S. Army COE Section 10 and 404 Permits, Northern and Central Florida. Summary: EPA’s expressed environmental concerns about impacts to forested wetlands, including approximately 180 acres along the centerline which would be permanently converted to herbaceous wetlands. Rating EC2. E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM 10MRN1 12356 Federal Register / Vol. 71, No. 47 / Friday, March 10, 2006 / Notices EIS No. 20060016, ERP No. DC–NOA– E86002–00, Amendment 26 to the Gulf of Mexico Reef Fish Fishery Management Plan, Proposed Individual Fishing Quota (IFQ) Program to Reduce Overcapacity in the Commercial Red Snapper Fishery. Summary: While EPA has no objections to the proposed action, it did request clarification of some EJ issues. Rating LO. Final EISs EIS No. 20060017, ERP No. F–AFS– E65071–FL, Ocala National Forest Access Designation Process, Roads and Trails Systems Development, Implementation, Lake, Marion and Putnam Counties, FL. Summary: While EPA does not object to the proposed action, it did suggest recommendations to improve the monitoring plan. EIS No. 20060035, ERP No. F–AFS– F65056–OH, Wayne National Forest, Proposed Revised Land and Resource Management Plan, Implementation, Several Counties, OH. Summary: EPA does not object to the proposed action. EIS No. 20060037, ERP No. F–AFS– F65047–IN, German Ridge Restoration Project, to Restore Native Hardwood Communities, Implementation, Hoosier National Forest, Tell City Ranger District, Perry County, IN. Summary: While EPA’s previous concerns were resolved, it requested that the USFS to include a chronology of management actions by season as a planning feature to help minimize potential impacts to sensitive animals during migration and breeding. EIS No. 20060054, ERP No. FS–NOA– E55555–00, Reef Fish (Amendment 25) and Coastal Migratory Pelagics (Amendment 17) for Extending the Charter Vessel/Headboat Permit Moratorium, Gulf of Mexico and South Atlantic. dsatterwhite on PROD1PC65 with PROPOSAL Summary: EPA does not object to the proposed action. Dated: March 7, 2006. Robert W. Hargrove, Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities. [FR Doc. E6–3443 Filed 3–9–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P VerDate Aug<31>2005 20:31 Mar 09, 2006 Jkt 208001 ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [ER–FRL–6673–1] Environmental Impacts Statements; Notice of Availability Responsible Agency: Office of Federal Activities, General Information (202) 564–7167 or https://www.epa.gov/ compliance/nepa/. Weekly receipt of Environmental Impact Statements Filed February 27, 2006 Through March 3, 2006 Pursuant to 40 CFR 1506.9. EIS No. 20060067, Draft EIS, GSA, CA, Los Angeles Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) Federal Building, Consolidation of FBI Field Office Headquarters and 11 other Satellite Offices, Federal Central District, Los Angeles, CA, Comment Period Ends: April 24, 2006, Contact: Morris Angell 415–522–3473. EIS No. 20060068, Draft EIS, AFS, ID, Emerald Creek Garnet Area, To Provide a Public Recreational Area for Collecting Garnet Gemstone, U.S. Army COE Section 404 Permit, Idaho Panhandle National Forest, St. Joe Ranger District, Latah County, ID, Comment Period Ends: April 24, 2006, Contact: Tracy Gravelle 208– 245–6200. EIS No. 20060069, Draft EIS, FHW, CA, Interstate 5/Cosumnes River Boulevard Interchange Project, Extension of Cosumnes River Boulevard from Franklin Boulevard to Freeport Boulevard with an Interchange at Interstate 5, South of the Pocket/Meadowview Road Interchange and North of the Laguna Boulevard Interchange, City of Sacramento, Sacramento County, CA, Comment Period Ends: April 28, 2006, Contact: Cesar E. Perez 916– 498–5865. EIS No. 20060070, Final EIS, AFS, OR, Tamarack Quarry Expansion Project, Secure a Long-Term Economical Source of Rock Material to Use for Highway and Road Maintenance, Mt. Hood National Forest, Clackamas County, OR, Wait Period Ends: April 10, 2006, Contact: Mike Redmond 503–668–1776 . This document is available on the Internet at: https://www.fs.fed.us/r6/ mthood/projects/documents. EIS No. 20060071, Draft EIS, AFS, NM, Santa Fe National Forest Plan Amendment for Oil & Gas Leasing and Roads Management, Implementation, San Juan Basin, Cuba Ranger District, NM, Comment Period Ends: April 24, 2006, Contact: Allen Fowler 505–438– 7821. PO 00000 Frm 00024 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 EIS No. 20060072, Draft EIS, FHW, 00, US59—Amelia Earhart Memorial Bridge over the Missouri River, Construction from Atchison, Kansas to US59/State Route 45 Intersection, U.S. Coast Guard Section 9 Permit and U.S. Army COE Section 10 and 404 Permits, Atchison, KS and Buchanan County, MO, Comment Period Ends: May 1, 2006, Contact: Kurt Dunn 785–271–2448, Ext. 207. EIS No. 20060073, Draft EIS, NRS, AR, Little Red River Irrigation Project, Develop a Water Management Plan for Irrigation Purposes in Seary, U.S. Army COE Section 404 Permit, Raft Creek, White County, AR, Comment Period Ends: April 24, 2006, Contact: Belinda Bell 501–301–3100. EIS No. 20060074, Draft EIS, AFS, AZ, Deep Lake Allotment Project, Proposes to Re-authorize Grazing, Mormon Lake Ranger District, Coconino National District, Coconino County, AZ, Comment Period Ends: April 24, 2006, Contact: Katherine Sanchez Meador 928–527– 8263. EIS No. 20060075, Draft EIS, AFS, 00, Wasatch-Cache National Forest Noxious Weed Treatment Program, Proposes to Treat Noxious Weeds 1.2 Million Acres of Wilderness and NonWilderness Areas, several counties, UT and Uinta County, WY, Comment Period Ends: April 24, 2006, Contact: Mike Duncan 801–236–3415. EIS No. 20060076, Final EIS, CGD, 00, Main Pass Energy Hub Deepwater Port License Application, Proposes to Construct a Deepwater Port and Associated Anchorages, U.S. Army COE Section 10 and 404 Permit, Gulf of Mexico (GOM), southeast of the coast of Louisiana in Main Pass Block (MP) 299 and from the Mississippi coast in MP 164, Wait Period Ends: April 24, 2006, Contact: Mark A. Prescott 202–267–0225. Dated: March 7, 2006. Robert W. Hargrove, Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities. [FR Doc. 06–2314 Filed 3–9–06; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [EPA-HQ-OPP–2005–0532; FRL–7761–6] Notice of Filing of a Pesticide Petition for the Establishment of a Regulation for the Residues of Dimethomorph in or on Brassica Head and Stem Food Commodities Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). AGENCY: E:\FR\FM\10MRN1.SGM 10MRN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 71, Number 47 (Friday, March 10, 2006)]
[Notices]
[Pages 12355-12356]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: E6-3443]


=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[ER-FRL-6673-2]


Environmental Impact Statements and Regulations; Availability of 
EPA Comments

    Availability of EPA comments prepared pursuant to the Environmental 
Review Process (ERP), under section 309 of the Clean Air Act and 
section 102(2)(c) of the National Environmental Policy Act as amended. 
Requests for copies of EPA comments can be directed to the Office of 
Federal Activities at 202-564-7167. An explanation of the ratings 
assigned to draft environmental impact statements (EISs) was published 
in FR datedApril 1, 2005 (70 FR 16815).

Draft EISs

EIS No. 20050501, ERP No. D-NRS-G39045-AR, Walnut Bayou Irrigation 
Project, Natural Resource Plan for the Little Red River Watershed, 
Little River County, AR.

    Summary: EPA expressed environmental concern about potential 
impacts to wetlands, and requested additional information to address 
wetland impacts and required mitigation.
    Rating EC2.

EIS No. 20050518, ERP No. D-BLM-J02049-WY, Atlantic Rim Natural Gas 
Field DevelopmentProject, Proposed Natural Gas Development to 2000 
Wells, 1800 to Coal Beds and 200 to Other Formations, Carbon County, 
WY.

    Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about air and water/
wetland impacts, and requested additional information on these issues 
and mitigation.
    Rating EC2.

EIS No. 20050520, ERP No. D-BIA-L61230-OR, Coyote Business Park, 
Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation, Proposes to 
Develop, Build and Manage a Light Industrial Commercial Business Park, 
Umatilla County, OR.

    Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about surface and 
ground water quality impact, and suggests that the use of low input 
development strategies could help reduce those impacts.
    Rating EC1.

EIS No. 20050535, ERP No. D-BIA-L03012-AK, Cordova Oil Spill Response 
Facility, Construct an Oil Spill Response Facility at Shepard Point, 
NPDES Permit and U.S. Army COE Section 10 and 404 Permits, Cordova, AK.

    Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about impacts to 
rocky shoreline habitat and special aquatic resources (eelgrass beds).
    Rating EC2.

EIS No. 20050543, ERP No. D-NPS-D61058-VA, Manassas National 
Battlefield Park GeneralManagement Plan, Implementation, Fairfax and 
Prince William Counties, VA.

    Summary: EPA expressed environmental concerns about wetland, 
vegetation wildlife, transportation, and the local community impacts, 
and requested additional forest and wetland mitigation and additional 
information on the impacts of closing U.S. Route 29 and VA Route 234 
within Manassas National Battlefield Park.
    Rating EC2.
EIS No. 20050551, ERP No. D-NAS-A12044-00, Programmatic--Development of 
AdvancedRadioisotope Power Systems, Two New AdvancedRPS's: Multi-
Mission Radioisotope ThermoelectricGenerator (MMRTG) and Stirling 
RadioisotopeGenerator (SRG).

    Summary: EPA does not object to the proposed action. Rating LO.
EIS No. 20050552, ERP No. D-FRC-E03014-FL, Cypress Pipeline Project and 
Phase VII ExpansionProject, Construction and Operation, U.S. Army COE 
Section 10 and 404 Permits, Northern and Central Florida.

    Summary: EPA's expressed environmental concerns about impacts to 
forested wetlands, including approximately 180 acres along the 
centerline which would be permanently converted to herbaceous wetlands. 
Rating EC2.


[[Page 12356]]


EIS No. 20060016, ERP No. DC-NOA-E86002-00, Amendment 26 to the Gulf of 
Mexico Reef FishFishery Management Plan, Proposed Individual Fishing 
Quota (IFQ) Program to Reduce Overcapacity in the Commercial Red 
Snapper Fishery.
    Summary: While EPA has no objections to the proposed action, it did 
request clarification of some EJ issues. Rating LO.

Final EISs

EIS No. 20060017, ERP No. F-AFS-E65071-FL, Ocala National Forest Access 
Designation Process, Roads and Trails Systems Development, 
Implementation, Lake, Marion and Putnam Counties, FL.

    Summary: While EPA does not object to the proposed action, it did 
suggest recommendations to improve the monitoring plan.

EIS No. 20060035, ERP No. F-AFS-F65056-OH, Wayne National Forest, 
Proposed Revised Land and Resource Management Plan, Implementation, 
SeveralCounties, OH.

    Summary: EPA does not object to the proposed action.

EIS No. 20060037, ERP No. F-AFS-F65047-IN, German Ridge Restoration 
Project, to Restore Native Hardwood Communities, Implementation, 
Hoosier National Forest, Tell City Ranger District, Perry County, IN.

    Summary: While EPA's previous concerns were resolved, it requested 
that the USFS to include a chronology of management actions by season 
as a planning feature to help minimize potential impacts to sensitive 
animals during migration and breeding.

EIS No. 20060054, ERP No. FS-NOA-E55555-00, Reef Fish (Amendment 25) 
and Coastal MigratoryPelagics (Amendment 17) for Extending the Charter 
Vessel/Headboat Permit Moratorium, Gulf of Mexico and South Atlantic.

    Summary: EPA does not object to the proposed action.

    Dated: March 7, 2006.
Robert W. Hargrove,
Director, NEPA Compliance Division, Office of Federal Activities.
 [FR Doc. E6-3443 Filed 3-9-06; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.