Environmental Protection Agency May 26, 2005 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents
Results 1 - 22 of 22
Implementation of the 8-Hour Ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard-Phase 1: Reconsideration
The EPA is taking final action on two issues raised in a petition for reconsideration of EPA's rule to implement the 8-hour ozone national ambient air quality standard (NAAQS or standard). In addition, EPA is taking final action to clarify two aspects of that implementation rule. On April 30, 2004, EPA issued a final rule addressing key elements of the program to implement the 8-hour ozone NAAQS (Phase 1 Rule). Subsequently, on June 29, 2004, and September 24, 2004, three different parties each filed a petition for reconsideration of certain specified aspects of the final rule. By letter dated September 23, 2004, EPA granted reconsideration of three issues raised in the petition for reconsideration filed by Earthjustice on behalf of several environmental organizations. On February 3, 2005, we proposed action on two of the issues and today we are taking final action on these two issues: The applicability of the section 185 fee provisions once the 1-hour NAAQS is revoked, and the timing for determining what is an ``applicable requirement'' for purposes of anti-backsliding once the 1-hour NAAQS is revoked. On April 4, 2005, we issued a separate proposed rule on new source review (NSR) anti-backsliding, the third issue on which we granted reconsideration, and we plan to issue a final rule by June 30, 2005. In the February 3, 2005 proposal, we also proposed to revise the Phase 1 Rule in two respects. Today, we are taking final action on these two issues. First, we have determined that contingency measures for failure to make reasonable further progress (RFP) or attain by the applicable attainment date for the 1-hour ozone standard are no longer required as part of the State implementation plan (SIP) for as part of the SIP for an area after revocation of that standard. Second, we are adding the requirement to submit attainment demonstrations to the definition of ``applicable requirements'' in Sec. 51.900.
Petition to Remove 4,4′-Methylene Diphenyl Diisocyanate From the List of Hazardous Air Pollutants
The EPA is announcing the receipt of a complete petition from the Diisocyanates Panel of the American Chemistry Council (ACC) requesting EPA to remove the chemical 4,4'-methylene diphenyl diisocyanate (MDI)(Chemical Abstract Service No. 101-68-8) from the list of hazardous air pollutants (HAP) contained in section 112(b)(1) of the Clean Air Act (CAA). We have determined that the ACC's original petition dated December 23, 2002, and the addenda provided by the ACC through March 7, 2005, will support an assessment of the human health impacts associated with people living in the vicinity of facilities emitting MDI. In addition, the data submitted by the ACC will support an assessment of the environmental impacts associated with emissions of MDI to the ambient air and deposited onto soil or water. Consequently, we have concluded that ACC's petition is complete as of March 7, 2005, the date that the last addendum was received, and is ready for public comment and the technical review phase of our delisting procedure. The EPA invites the public to comment on the petition and to provide additional data, beyond that filed in the petition, on sources, emissions, exposure, health effects and environmental impacts associated with MDI that may be relevant to our technical review. The petition is available through Docket ID OAR-2005-0085.
Chloroneb Risk Assessment; Related Document, and Input on Risk Management; Notice of Availability
This notice announces the availability of EPA's risk assessments, and related documents for the fungicide, chloroneb and opens a public comment period on these documents. The public is also encouraged to suggest risk management ideas or proposals to address the risks identified. EPA is developing a Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) for Chloroneb through a modified, 4-Phase public participation process that the Agency uses to involve the public in developing pesticide reregistration and tolerance reassessment decisions. Through these programs, EPA is ensuring that all pesticides meet current health and safety standards.
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Pennsylvania; Withdrawal of Direct Final Rule
Due to an adverse comment, EPA is withdrawing the direct final rule to approve reasonable available control technology (RACT) to limit volatile organic compound (VOC) and nitrogen oxides (NOX) emissions from three individual sources located in Pennsylvania. In the direct final rule published on April 4, 2005 (70 FR 16955), we stated that if we received adverse comment by May 4, 2005, the rule would be withdrawn and not take effect. EPA subsequently received an adverse comment on April 16, 2005. EPA will address the comment received in a subsequent final action based upon the proposed action also published on April 4, 2005 (70 FR 17027). EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Pennsylvania; Withdrawal of Direct Final Rule
Due to an adverse comment, EPA is withdrawing the direct final rule to approve reasonable available control technology (RACT) to limit volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from three individual sources located in Pennsylvania. In the direct final rule published on April 1, 2005 (70 FR 16717), we stated that if we received adverse comment by May 2, 2005, the rule would be withdrawn and not take effect. EPA subsequently received an adverse comment on April 1, 2005. EPA will address the comment received in a subsequent final action based upon the proposed action also published on April 1, 2005 (70 FR 16784). EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Pennsylvania; Partial Withdrawal of Direct Final Rule
Due to an adverse comment, EPA is withdrawing a paragraph that was included as part of a direct final rule to approve reasonable available control technology (RACT) to limit nitrogen oxides (NOX) emissions from fifteen individual sources located in Pennsylvania. In the direct final rule published on March 31, 2005 (70 FR 16423), we stated that if we received adverse comments by May 2, 2005, the rule would be withdrawn and would not take effect. EPA subsequently received an adverse comment on one provision of that direct final rule and is withdrawing that provision. EPA will address the comment received in a subsequent final action based upon the proposed action also published on March 31, 2005 (70 FR 16471). EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Pennsylvania; Withdrawal of Direct Final Rule
Due to adverse comments, EPA is withdrawing the direct final rule to approve Pennsylvania's State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision. The SIP revision pertains to source-specific nitrogen oxides (NOX) reasonably available control technology (RACT) determination for five individual sources located in Pennsylvania. In the direct final rule published on March 30, 2005 (70 FR 16115), we stated that if we received adverse comments by April 29, 2005, the rule would be withdrawn and not take effect. EPA subsequently received adverse comments. EPA will address the comments received in a subsequent final action based upon the proposed action also published on March 30, 2005 (70 FR 16203). EPA will not institute a second comment period on this action.
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Pennsylvania; VOC and NOX
Due to incomplete information contained in the Commonwealth's submission, EPA is withdrawing an individual source that was included as part of a direct final rule to approve Pennsylvania's SIP pertaining to source-specific volatile organic compounds (VOC) and nitrogen oxides (NOX) RACT determinations for eleven individual sources located in Pennsylvania. The direct final rule was published on March 31, 2005 (70 FR 16416). Subsequently, EPA is withdrawing the one provision of that direct final rule.
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Pennsylvania; VOC and NOX
Due to incomplete information contained in the Commonwealth's submission, EPA is withdrawing an individual source that was included as part of a proposed rule to approve Pennsylvania's SIP pertaining to source-specific volatile organic compounds (VOC) and nitrogen oxides (NOX) RACT determinations for eleven individual sources located in Pennsylvania. The proposed rule was published on March 31, 2005 (70 FR 16469). Subsequently, EPA is withdrawing the one provision of that proposed rule.
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maine; Smaller-Scale Electric Generating Resources
EPA is proposing to approve a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of Maine. This revision establishes requirements to reduce emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOX), sulfur dioxide (SO2), particulate matter (PM), and carbon monoxide (CO) from smaller-scale electric generating units. The intended effect of this action is to approve these requirements into the Maine SIP. EPA is taking this action in accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA).
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maine; Smaller-Scale Electric Generating Resources
EPA is approving a State Implementation Plan (SIP) revision submitted by the State of Maine. This revision establishes requirements to reduce emissions of nitrogen oxides (NOX), sulfur dioxide (SO2), particulate matter (PM), and carbon monoxide (CO) from smaller-scale electric generating units. The intended effect of this action is to approve these requirements into the Maine SIP. EPA is taking this action in accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA).
Adequacy Determination for the Ogden City Area Carbon Monoxide Maintenance State Implementation Plan for Transportation Conformity Purposes; State of Utah
In this document, EPA is notifying the public that we have found that the motor vehicle emissions budget for 2021 in the Ogden, Utah Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Plan, that was submitted by Utah Governor Olene S. Walker on November 29, 2004, is adequate for transportation conformity purposes. 40 CFR 93.118(e)(2) requires that EPA declare an implementation plan submission's motor vehicle emissions budget adequate for conformity purposes prior to the budget being used to satisfy the conformity requirements of 40 CFR part 93. As a result of our finding, the Wasatch Front Regional Council of Governments, the Utah Department of Transportation and the U.S. Department of Transportation are required to use the motor vehicle emissions budget from this submitted maintenance plan for future transportation conformity determinations.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Minimum Monitoring Requirements for Direct and Indirect Discharging Mills in the Bleached Papergrade Kraft and Soda Subcategory and the Papergrade Sulfite Subcategory of the Pulp, Paper and Paperboard Point Source Category (Renewal), EPA ICR Number 1878.02, OMB Control Number 2040-0243
In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this document announces that an Information Collection Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval. This is a request to renew an existing approved collection. This ICR is scheduled to expire on May 31, 2005.Under OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor the collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB. This ICR describes the nature of the information collection and its estimated burden and cost.
Revisions to the Arizona State Implementation Plan, Maricopa County
EPA is finalizing approval of revisions to the Maricopa County portion of the Arizona State Implementation Plan (SIP). These revisions were proposed in the Federal Register on March 23, 2005 and concern volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from expandable polystyrene foam operations. We are approving local Rule 358Polystyrene Foam Operations. This rule regulates these emission sources under the Clean Air Act as amended in 1990 (CAA or the Act).
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; NPDES and Sewage Sludge Monitoring Reports (Renewal), EPA ICR Number 0229.16, OMB Control Number 2040-0004
In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this document announces that an Information Collection Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval. This is a request to renew an existing approved collection. This ICR is scheduled to expire on May 31, 2005. Under OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor the collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB. This ICR describes the nature of the information collection and its estimated burden and cost.
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maine; VOC Regulations
EPA is approving two State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the State of Maine. These revisions establish requirements to reduce volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from mobile equipment repair and refinishing, and solvent cleaning operations. The intended effect of this action is to approve these requirements into the Maine SIP. EPA is taking this action in accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA).
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Maine; VOC Regulations
EPA is proposing to approve two State Implementation Plan (SIP) revisions submitted by the State of Maine. These revisions establish requirements to reduce volatile organic compound (VOC) emissions from mobile equipment repair and refinishing, and solvent cleaning operations. The intended effect of this action is to approve these requirements into the Maine SIP. EPA is taking this action in accordance with the Clean Air Act (CAA).
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Protection of Stratospheric Ozone: Request for Applications for Critical Use Exemption From the Phaseout of Methyl Bromide (Renewal), EPA ICR Number 2031.02, OMB Control Number 2060-0482
In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this document announces that an Information Collection Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval. This is a request to renew an existing approved collection. This ICR is scheduled to expire on May 31, 2005. Under OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor the collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB. This ICR describes the nature of the information collection and its estimated burden and cost.
Agency Information Collection Activities; Submission to OMB for Review and Approval; Comment Request; Certification in Lieu of Chloroform Minimum Monitoring Requirements for Direct and Indirect Discharging Mills in the Bleached Papergrade Kraft and Soda Subcategory of the Pulp, Paper and Paperboard Point Source Category (Renewal), EPA ICR Number 2015.02, OMB Control Number 2040-0242
In compliance with the Paperwork Reduction Act (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), this document announces that an Information Collection Request (ICR) has been forwarded to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) for review and approval. This is a request to renew and existing approved collection. This ICR is scheduled to expire on May 31, 2005.Under OMB regulations, the Agency may continue to conduct or sponsor the collection of information while this submission is pending at OMB. This ICR describes the nature of the information collection and its estimated burden and cost.
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; South Carolina and Georgia; Attainment Demonstration for the Appalachian, Catawba, Pee Dee, Waccamaw, Santee Lynches, Berkeley-Charleston-Dorchester, Low Country, Lower Savannah, Central Midlands, and Upper Savannah Early Action Compact Areas
The EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the State Implementation Plans (SIPs) submitted by the South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control (SC DHEC) and Georgia Environmental Protection Division (EPD) on December 31, 2004. These revisions are submitted pursuant to the Early Action Compact (EAC) Protocol \1\ and will result in emission reductions needed to attain and maintain the 8- hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) in the Appalachian, Catawba, Pee Dee, Waccamaw, Santee Lynches, Berkeley- Charleston-Dorchester, Low Country, Lower Savannah, Central Midlands, and Upper Savannah EAC areas. Only the Lower Savannah EAC area has counties in both South Carolina and Georgia; for the purposes of this document, however, the above described EAC areas will be collectively referred to as the ``South CarolinaGeorgia EAC Areas.'' EPA is proposing approval of the photochemical modeling used by South Carolina and Georgia to support the attainment demonstration of the 8-hour ozone standard within these areas. The proposed revisions further incorporate the local control measures in the South CarolinaGeorgia EAC Areas, a new regulation, 61-62.5 Standard No. 5.2, Control of Oxides of Nitrogen (NOX) and revisions to Regulation 61-62.2, Prohibition of Open Burning.
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; North Carolina; Attainment Demonstration of the Mountain, Unifour, Triad and Fayetteville Early Action Compact Areas
The EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the State Implementation Plan (SIP) submitted by the State of North Carolina through the Department of Environment and Natural Resources (DENR) on December 21, 2004. These revisions are submitted pursuant to the Early Action Compact (EAC) protocol \1\ and will result in emission reductions needed to attain and maintain the 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) in the Mountain, Unifour, Triad and Fayetteville EAC areas (the North Carolina EAC Areas). EPA is proposing approval of the photochemical modeling used by North Carolina to support the attainment demonstration of the 8-hour ozone standard within these areas. The proposed revisions further incorporate the local control measures of the Mountain, Unifour, Triad and Fayetteville EAC area agreements into the SIP.
Approval and Promulgation of Air Quality Implementation Plans; Tennessee and Georgia; Attainment Demonstrations for the Chattanooga, Nashville, and Tri-Cities Early Action Compact Areas
The EPA is proposing to approve revisions to the Tennessee and Georgia State Implementation Plans (SIPs) respectively submitted by the State of Tennessee through the Department of Environment and Conservation on December 29, 2004, and by the State of Georgia through the Environmental Protection Division on December 31, 2004. These revisions are submitted pursuant to the Early Action Compact (EAC) protocol \1\ and will result in emission reductions needed to attain and maintain the 8-hour ozone National Ambient Air Quality Standard (NAAQS) in the Chattanooga, Nashville, and Tri-Cities EAC areas. EPA is proposing approval of the photochemical modeling which supports the attainment demonstration of the 8-hour ozone standard within these areas. The proposed revisions further incorporate the local control measures of the Chattanooga, Nashville, and Tri-Cities EAC area agreements into the SIP. EPA is also proposing revisions to the Vehicle Inspection and Maintenance (I/M), Stage I Vapor Recovery and Motor Vehicle Tampering Tennessee SIP regulations. EPA is proposing to approve revisions to Georgia's rules for Stage I Vapor Recovery and open burning.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google
Privacy Policy and
Terms of Service apply.