Adequacy Determination for the Ogden City Area Carbon Monoxide Maintenance State Implementation Plan for Transportation Conformity Purposes; State of Utah, 30440-30441 [05-10496]

Download as PDF 30440 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 101 / Thursday, May 26, 2005 / Notices (subpart E) mills under 40 CFR part 430 as part of the effluent limitations guidelines and standards promulgated on April 15, 1998. As a result, the permitting and pretreatment control authority requires applicable facilities subject to subparts B or E to monitor their effluent for adsorbable organic halides (AOX), 2,3,7,8tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD), 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzofuran (TCDF), chloroform, and 12 chlorinated phenolics at specified frequencies. See 40 CFR 430.02. Under 40 CFR 122.41(e)(4), the discharger must then report these monitoring results to the permitting or pretreatment control authority using either Discharge Monitoring Reports (DMRs) or Periodic Compliance Reports (PCRs). These minimum monitoring requirements and corresponding reporting requirements are necessary to demonstrate compliance with the effluent limitations guidelines and standards promulgated at 40 CFR part 430, subparts B and E. An agency may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a collection of information unless it displays a currently valid OMB control number. The OMB control numbers for EPA’s regulations in 40 CFR are listed in 40 CFR part 9 and are identified on the form and/or instrument, if applicable. Burden Statement: The annual public reporting and recordkeeping burden for this collection of information is estimated to average 361 hours per response. Burden means the total time, effort, or financial resources expended by persons to generate, maintain, retain, or disclose or provide information to or for a Federal agency. This includes the time needed to review instructions; develop, acquire, install, and utilize technology and systems for the purposes of collecting, validating, and verifying information, processing and maintaining information, and disclosing and providing information; adjust the existing ways to comply with any previously applicable instructions and requirements; train personnel to be able to respond to a collection of information; search data sources; complete and review the collection of information; and transmit or otherwise disclose the information. Respondents/Affected Entities: Operations that chemically pulp wood fiber using kraft or soda methods to produce bleached papergrade pulp, paperboard, coarse paper, tissue paper, fine paper, and/or paperboard; and those operations that chemically pump wood fiber using papergrade sulfite methods to produce pulp and/or paper. VerDate jul<14>2003 19:11 May 25, 2005 Jkt 205001 Estimated Number of Respondents: 138. Frequency of Response: No less than annually for direct dischargers and no less than twice annually for indirect dischargers. Estimated Total Annual Hour Burden: 37,544. Estimated Total Annual Cost: $15,086,000, which includes $0 annual capital/startup costs, $13,819,000 annual O&M costs and $1,267,000 annual labor costs. Changes in the Estimates: There is slight increase in the burden hours currently identified in the OMB Inventory of Approved ICR Burdens which is due to an adjustment in the number of respondents. There is a decrease in the annual cost due to the fact that the one-time capital costs incurred under the original ICR are not included in this renewal ICR. Dated: May 18, 2005. Oscar Morales, Director, Collection Strategies Division. [FR Doc. 05–10495 Filed 5–25–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [R08–OAR–2005–UT–0005; FRL–7916–9] Adequacy Determination for the Ogden City Area Carbon Monoxide Maintenance State Implementation Plan for Transportation Conformity Purposes; State of Utah Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice of adequacy. AGENCY: SUMMARY: In this document, EPA is notifying the public that we have found that the motor vehicle emissions budget for 2021 in the Ogden, Utah Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Plan, that was submitted by Utah Governor Olene S. Walker on November 29, 2004, is adequate for transportation conformity purposes. 40 CFR 93.118(e)(2) requires that EPA declare an implementation plan submission’s motor vehicle emissions budget adequate for conformity purposes prior to the budget being used to satisfy the conformity requirements of 40 CFR part 93. As a result of our finding, the Wasatch Front Regional Council of Governments, the Utah Department of Transportation and the U.S. Department of Transportation are required to use the motor vehicle emissions budget from this submitted maintenance plan for future transportation conformity determinations. PO 00000 Frm 00031 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 DATES: This finding is effective June 10, 2005. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Kimes, Air & Radiation Program (8P–AR), United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8, 999 18th Street, Suite 300, Denver, Colorado 80202–2466, (303) 312–6445, kimes.jeffrey@epa.gov. The letter documenting our finding is available at EPA’s conformity Web site: https://www.epa.gov/otaq/transp/ conform/adequacy.htm. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ‘‘we’’, ‘‘us’’, or ‘‘our’’ are used to mean EPA. This action is simply an announcement of a finding that we have already made. We sent a letter to the Utah Division of Air Quality on May 2, 2005, stating that the motor vehicle emission budget in the submitted Ogden, Utah Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Plan is adequate. This finding has also been announced on our conformity Web site at https:// www.epa.gov/otaq/transp/conform/ adequacy.htm. Transportation conformity is required by section 176(c) of the Clean Air Act. Our conformity rule requires that transportation plans, programs, and projects conform to SIPs and establishes the criteria and procedures for determining whether or not they demonstrate conformity. Conformity to a SIP means that transportation activities will not produce new air quality violations, worsen existing violations, or delay timely attainment of the national ambient air quality standards. The criteria by which we determine whether a SIP’s motor vehicle emission budgets are adequate for conformity purposes are outlined in 40 CFR 93.118(e)(4). Please note that an adequacy review is separate from our completeness review, and it also should not be used to prejudge our ultimate approval of the SIP. Even if we find a budget adequate, the SIP could later be disapproved, and vice versa. The process for determining the adequacy of a transportation conformity budget is described at 40 CFR 93.118(f). For the reader’s ease, we have excerpted the motor vehicle emission budget from the Ogden, Utah Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Plan and it is as follows: Motor vehicle emissions budget for the year 2021 is 73.02 tons per day of CO. 40 CFR 93.118(e)(1) requires that previously approved budgets for years other than 2021 must still be used in any conformity determination until the maintenance plan is fully approved by EPA. E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM 26MYN1 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 101 / Thursday, May 26, 2005 / Notices Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq. Dated: May 10, 2005. Robert E. Roberts, Regional Administrator, Region VIII. [FR Doc. 05–10496 Filed 5–25–05; 8:45 am] BILLING CODE 6560–50–P ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY [OPP–2004–0369; FRL–7711–5] Chloroneb Risk Assessment; Related Document, and Input on Risk Management; Notice of Availability Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). ACTION: Notice. AGENCY: SUMMARY: This notice announces the availability of EPA’s risk assessments, and related documents for the fungicide, chloroneb and opens a public comment period on these documents. The public is also encouraged to suggest risk management ideas or proposals to address the risks identified. EPA is developing a Reregistration Eligibility Decision (RED) for Chloroneb through a modified, 4-Phase public participation process that the Agency uses to involve the public in developing pesticide reregistration and tolerance reassessment decisions. Through these programs, EPA is ensuring that all pesticides meet current health and safety standards. DATES: Comments, identified by docket identification (ID) number OPP–2004– 0369, must be received on or before July 25, 2005. ADDRESSES: Comments may be submitted electronically, by mail, or through hand delivery/courier. Follow the detailed instructions as provided in Unit I. of the SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION. FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Wilhelmena Livingston, Special Review and Reregistration Division (7508C), Office of Pesticide Programs, Environmental Protection Agency, 1200 Pennsylvania Ave., NW., Washington, DC 20460–0001; telephone number: (703) 308–8025; fax number: (703) 308– 8041; e-mail address:livingston.wilhelmena@epa.gov. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: I. General Information A. Does this Action Apply to Me? This action is directed to the public in general, and may be of interest to a wide range of stakeholders including environmental, human health, and agricultural advocates; the chemical VerDate jul<14>2003 19:11 May 25, 2005 Jkt 205001 industry; pesticide users; and members of the public interested in the sale, distribution, or use of pesticides. Since others may also be interested, the Agency has not attempted to describe all the specific entities that may be affected by this action. If you have any questions regarding the applicability of this action to a particular entity, consult the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT. B. How Can I Get Copies of this Document and Other Related Information? 1. Docket. EPA has established an official public docket for this action under docket ID number OPP–2004– 0369. The official public docket consists of the documents specifically referenced in this action, any public comments received, and other information related to this action. Although, a part of the official docket, the public docket does not include Confidential Business Information (CBI) or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. The official public docket is the collection of materials that is available for public viewing at the Public Information and Records Integrity Branch (PIRIB), Rm. 119, Crystal Mall #2, 1801 S. Bell St., Arlington, VA. This docket facility is open from 8:30 a.m. to 4 p.m., Monday through Friday, excluding legal holidays. The docket telephone number is (703) 305–5805. 2. Electronic access. You may access this Federal Register document electronically through the EPA Internet under the ‘‘Federal Register’’ listings at https://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/. An electronic version of the public docket is available through EPA’s electronic public docket and comment system, EPA Dockets. You may use EPA Dockets at https://www.epa.gov/edocket/ to submit or view public comments, access the index listing of the contents of the official public docket, and to access those documents in the public docket that are available electronically. Once in the system, select ‘‘search,’’ then key in the appropriate docket ID number. Certain types of information will not be placed in the EPA Dockets. Information claimed as CBI and other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute, which is not included in the official public docket, will not be available for public viewing in EPA’s electronic public docket. EPA’s policy is that copyrighted material will not be placed in EPA’s electronic public docket but will be available only in printed, paper form in the official public docket. To the extent feasible, publicly available docket materials will be made PO 00000 Frm 00032 Fmt 4703 Sfmt 4703 30441 available in EPA’s electronic public docket. When a document is selected from the index list in EPA Dockets, the system will identify whether the document is available for viewing in EPA’s electronic public docket. Although, not all docket materials may be available electronically, you may still access any of the publicly available docket materials through the docket facility identified in Unit I.B.1. EPA intends to work towards providing electronic access to all of the publicly available docket materials through EPA’s electronic public docket. For public commenters, it is important to note that EPA’s policy is that public comments, whether submitted electronically or on paper, will be made available for public viewing in EPA’s electronic public docket as EPA receives them and without change, unless the comment contains copyrighted material, CBI, or other information whose disclosure is restricted by statute. When EPA identifies a comment containing copyrighted material, EPA will provide a reference to that material in the version of the comment that is placed in EPA’s electronic public docket. The entire printed comment, including the copyrighted material, will be available in the public docket. Public comments submitted on computer disks that are mailed or delivered to the docket will be transferred to EPA’s electronic public docket. Public comments that are mailed or delivered to the docket will be scanned and placed in EPA’s electronic public docket. Where practical, physical objects will be photographed, and the photograph will be placed in EPA’s electronic public docket along with a brief description written by the docket staff. C. How and to Whom Do I Submit Comments? You may submit comments electronically, by mail, or through hand delivery/courier. To ensure proper receipt by EPA, identify the appropriate docket ID number in the subject line on the first page of your comment. Please ensure that your comments are submitted within the specified comment period. Comments received after the close of the comment period will be marked ‘‘late.’’ EPA is not required to consider these late comments. If you wish to submit CBI or information that is otherwise protected by statute, please follow the instructions in Unit I.D. Do not use EPA Dockets or e-mail to submit CBI or information protected by statute. 1. Electronically. If you submit an electronic comment as prescribed in this E:\FR\FM\26MYN1.SGM 26MYN1

Agencies

[Federal Register Volume 70, Number 101 (Thursday, May 26, 2005)]
[Notices]
[Pages 30440-30441]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Printing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 05-10496]


-----------------------------------------------------------------------

ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY

[R08-OAR-2005-UT-0005; FRL-7916-9]


Adequacy Determination for the Ogden City Area Carbon Monoxide 
Maintenance State Implementation Plan for Transportation Conformity 
Purposes; State of Utah

AGENCY: Environmental Protection Agency (EPA).

ACTION: Notice of adequacy.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------

SUMMARY: In this document, EPA is notifying the public that we have 
found that the motor vehicle emissions budget for 2021 in the Ogden, 
Utah Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Plan, that was submitted by Utah 
Governor Olene S. Walker on November 29, 2004, is adequate for 
transportation conformity purposes. 40 CFR 93.118(e)(2) requires that 
EPA declare an implementation plan submission's motor vehicle emissions 
budget adequate for conformity purposes prior to the budget being used 
to satisfy the conformity requirements of 40 CFR part 93. As a result 
of our finding, the Wasatch Front Regional Council of Governments, the 
Utah Department of Transportation and the U.S. Department of 
Transportation are required to use the motor vehicle emissions budget 
from this submitted maintenance plan for future transportation 
conformity determinations.

DATES: This finding is effective June 10, 2005.

FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Jeffrey Kimes, Air & Radiation Program 
(8P-AR), United States Environmental Protection Agency, Region 8, 999 
18th Street, Suite 300, Denver, Colorado 80202-2466, (303) 312-6445, 
kimes.jeffrey@epa.gov.
    The letter documenting our finding is available at EPA's conformity 
Web site: https://www.epa.gov/otaq/transp/conform/adequacy.htm.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Throughout this document ``we'', ``us'', or 
``our'' are used to mean EPA.
    This action is simply an announcement of a finding that we have 
already made. We sent a letter to the Utah Division of Air Quality on 
May 2, 2005, stating that the motor vehicle emission budget in the 
submitted Ogden, Utah Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Plan is adequate. 
This finding has also been announced on our conformity Web site at 
https://www.epa.gov/otaq/transp/conform/adequacy.htm.
    Transportation conformity is required by section 176(c) of the 
Clean Air Act. Our conformity rule requires that transportation plans, 
programs, and projects conform to SIPs and establishes the criteria and 
procedures for determining whether or not they demonstrate conformity. 
Conformity to a SIP means that transportation activities will not 
produce new air quality violations, worsen existing violations, or 
delay timely attainment of the national ambient air quality standards.
    The criteria by which we determine whether a SIP's motor vehicle 
emission budgets are adequate for conformity purposes are outlined in 
40 CFR 93.118(e)(4). Please note that an adequacy review is separate 
from our completeness review, and it also should not be used to 
prejudge our ultimate approval of the SIP. Even if we find a budget 
adequate, the SIP could later be disapproved, and vice versa.
    The process for determining the adequacy of a transportation 
conformity budget is described at 40 CFR 93.118(f).
    For the reader's ease, we have excerpted the motor vehicle emission 
budget from the Ogden, Utah Carbon Monoxide Maintenance Plan and it is 
as follows: Motor vehicle emissions budget for the year 2021 is 73.02 
tons per day of CO. 40 CFR 93.118(e)(1) requires that previously 
approved budgets for years other than 2021 must still be used in any 
conformity determination until the maintenance plan is fully approved 
by EPA.


[[Page 30441]]


    Authority: 42 U.S.C. 7401 et seq.

    Dated: May 10, 2005.
Robert E. Roberts,
Regional Administrator, Region VIII.
[FR Doc. 05-10496 Filed 5-25-05; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 6560-50-P
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.