Department of Transportation September 22, 2006 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents

Procedures for Transportation Workplace Drug and Alcohol Testing Programs: Corrections to the Federal Register
Document Number: E6-15617
Type: Rule
Date: 2006-09-22
Agency: Office of the Secretary, Department of Transportation
The Department of Transportation published in the Federal Register of August 23, 2006, a final rule (effective September 22, 2006) which added state-licensed or certified marriage and family therapists to the list of credentialed professionals eligible to serve as substance abuse professionals under subpart O of 49 CFR part 40. The final rule also made a series of technical amendments to its drug and alcohol testing procedural rule. This notice corrects a misspelling in the final rule and adds text that was discussed in the preamble but omitted in the rule text.
Quarterly Rail Cost Adjustment Factor
Document Number: 06-8099
Type: Notice
Date: 2006-09-22
Agency: Surface Transportation Board, Department of Transportation
The Board has approved the fourth quarter 2006 rail cost adjustment factor (RCAF) and cost index filed by the Association of American Railroads. The fourth quarter 2006 RCAF (Unadjusted) is 1.250. The fourth quarter 2006 RCAF (Adjusted) is 0.591. The fourth quarter 2006 RCAF-5 is 0.562.
Railroad Cost of Capital-2005
Document Number: 06-8097
Type: Notice
Date: 2006-09-22
Agency: Surface Transportation Board, Department of Transportation
On August 28, 2006, the Board served a decision to update its computation of the railroad industry's cost of capital for 2005. The composite after-tax cost-of-capital rate for 2005 is found to be 12.2%, based on a current cost of debt of 5.36%; a cost of common equity capital of 15.18%; and a capital structure mix comprised of 30.41% debt and 69.59% common equity. The cost-of-capital finding made in this proceeding will be used in a variety of Board proceedings.
Price Advertising
Document Number: 06-8041
Type: Proposed Rule
Date: 2006-09-22
Agency: Office of the Secretary, Department of Transportation
This document withdraws the Notice of Proposed Rulemaking (NPRM) that sought comments on whether and, if so, how the Department should amend 14 CFR 399.84, its air-transportation price-advertising rule. As a matter of enforcement policy, the Department has long allowed limited exceptions to the strict terms of the rule. The NPRM called for comments on several options: Maintain the current practice with or without codifying all of its elements in the rule, enforce the rule as written, revise the rule to eliminate most or all requirements for airfare advertisements but to specify that consumers must be told the total price before any purchase is made, or eliminate the rule altogether. The Department has decided based on the comments that the public interest will best be served by maintaining the status quo.
Safety of Private Highway-Rail Grade Crossings; Notice of Safety Inquiry
Document Number: 06-7811
Type: Notice
Date: 2006-09-22
Agency: Federal Railroad Administration, Department of Transportation
On July 27, 2006, FRA published a notice announcing its intent to conduct a series of open meetings throughout the United States, in cooperation with appropriate State agencies, to consider issues related to the safety of private highway-rail grade crossings. This notice indicated that the first of these meetings would be held August 30, 2006, in Fort Snelling, Minnesota. Notice No. 2 announces that FRA has scheduled subsequent meetings to be held September 27, 2006, in Raleigh, North Carolina; October 26, 2006, in San Francisco, California; and December 6, 2006, in New Orleans, Louisiana. At each open meeting, FRA intends to solicit oral statements from private crossing owners, railroads and other interested parties on issues related to the safety of private highway-rail grade crossings, which will include, but will not be limited to, current practices concerning the responsibility for safety at private grade crossings, the adequacy of warning devices at private crossings, and the relative merits of a more uniform approach to improving safety at private crossings. FRA has also opened a public docket on these issues so that interested parties may submit written comments for public review and consideration.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.