Department of Health and Human Services August 8, 2006 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents

Science Advisory Board to the National Center for Toxicological Research; Notice of Meeting
Document Number: E6-12863
Type: Notice
Date: 2006-08-08
Agency: Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services
New Animal Drugs For Use in Animal Feeds; Oxytetracycline
Document Number: E6-12862
Type: Rule
Date: 2006-08-08
Agency: Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is amending the animal drug regulations to reflect approval of a supplemental new animal drug application (NADA) filed by Phibro Animal Health. The supplemental NADA provides for the approval of the dihydrate salt of oxytetracycline in their Type A medicated article used in aquaculture feed, a change of oxytetracycline concentration in the Type A medicated article, and the addition of an indication for control of gaffkemia in lobsters.
Findings of Misconduct in Science
Document Number: E6-12857
Type: Notice
Date: 2006-08-08
Agency: Office of the Secretary, Department of Health and Human Services
Notice is hereby given that the Office of Research Integrity (ORI) and the Assistant Secretary for Health have taken final action in the following case: Ms. Sylvia Okoro, University of Maryland at Baltimore: Based on the University of Maryland at Baltimore (UMAB) investigation committee report and additional analysis and information obtained by ORI during its oversight review, the U.S. Public Health Service (PHS) found that Ms. Okoro, former Research Assistant, UMAB, engaged in misconduct in science by fabricating and falsifying patient data in research supported by National Institute on Aging (NIA), National Institutes of Health (NIH), grant R01 AG18461. Specifically, Ms. Okoro intentionally and knowingly fabricated and falsified data for six visit dates on one patient data form and falsified and fabricated patient condition information on two additional study subjects by failing to note that each patient had experienced a fall as documented in their medical charts. ORI has implemented the following administrative actions for a period of three (3) years, beginning July 17, 2006: (1) Ms. Okoro is prohibited from serving in any advisory capacity to PHS, including but not limited to service on any PHS advisory committee, board, and/or peer review committee, or as a consultant; and (2) Any institution that submits an application for PHS support for a research project on which Ms. Okoro's participation is proposed or which uses her services in any capacity on PHS supported research must concurrently submit a plan for supervision of her duties. The supervisory plan must be designed to ensure the scientific integrity of Ms. Okoro's research contribution and must be submitted to ORI by the institution.
Announcement of Availability of Funds for Cooperative Agreement With the Arkansas Center for Health Improvement (ACHI) for a Project Entitled, “From BMI to Student Body Mass Improvement: Healthy Achievement Through Awareness and Action-a Detailed Evaluation of the Arkansas School BMI Project.”
Document Number: E6-12819
Type: Notice
Date: 2006-08-08
Agency: Department of Health and Human Services
The Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (ODPHP)/ Office of Public Health and Science (OPHS), announces that up to $250,000 in fiscal year (FY) 2006 funds is available for a cooperative agreement with the Arkansas Center for Health Improvement (ACHI) for a project entitled, ``From BMI to Student Body Mass Improvement: Healthy Achievement Through Awareness and Actiona Detailed Evaluation of the Arkansas School BMI Project.'' Working in collaboration with the ACHI, administratively housed unit in the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (501C3 organization) and serves as the primary health policy development source for the Arkansas Department of Health and Human Services, the initiative seeks to gain information about programs that have established school based-body mass index assessments of school age children. The goals of this evaluation project are to identify key elements for the translation of BMI information as a public health intervention for positive behavioral change among families, children and adolescents to improve nutrition and increase physical activity. The project will design and pilot test a detailed evaluation protocol to assess the specific benefits and effectiveness of the Arkansas School BMI Assessment Project, building on the findings from the ACHI ReportThe 2005 Arkansas Assessment of Childhood and Adolescent Obesity; and The Year Two Evaluation of Arkansas Act 1220 conducted by the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences' College of Public Health with support from The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation. The evaluation protocol will specially address: The effectiveness and acceptability of the BMI assessment by teachers, students, families, and physicians; The essential information and care systems to support follow-up and follow-through for prevention and interventions; The students, families, and schools knowledge, attitudes, and adoption of healthier nutrition and physical activity choices; and, The changes in the individual BMI and the childhood population overweight and obesity rates. The purpose of this project is to assess the principles and outcomes of a statewide community-based intervention program incorporating various scientific methods and behavioral approaches. At a time when overweight and obesity are dramatically increasing, initiatives like the Arkansas School Body Mass Index (BMI) Assessment Project will evaluate the diverse populations that are at higher than average risk of developing excessive weight, especially children in urban/rural areas with a high prevalence of minority individuals. This program promotes several focus areas of the Healthy People 2010 including: Maternal, Infant, and Child Health; Nutrition and Overweight; Physical Activity and Educational and Community-Based Programs Health Communication. The project will be approved for up to a one-year period for a total of $250,000 (including indirect costs). Funding for the cooperative agreement is contingent upon the availability of funds.
Food and Drug Administration Electronic Submissions Gateway
Document Number: E6-12808
Type: Notice
Date: 2006-08-08
Agency: Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the availability of the FDA Electronic Submissions Gateway (ESG) for the receipt and processing of electronic submissions provided so that the Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research (CBER), the Center for Drug Evaluation and Research (CDER), and the Center for Devices and Radiological Health (CDRH) can receive regulatory submissions electronically. The FDA ESG enables applicants to send applications and other submissions for review using the Internet, provides a single point of entry for these submissions, and fulfills goals identified in the Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA III).
International Conference on Harmonisation; Draft Guidance on Q4B Regulatory Acceptance of Analytical Procedures and/or Acceptance Criteria; Availability
Document Number: E6-12807
Type: Notice
Date: 2006-08-08
Agency: Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the availability of a draft guidance entitled ``Q4B Regulatory Acceptance of Analytical Procedures and/or Acceptance Criteria.'' The draft guidance was prepared under the auspices of the International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH). The draft guidance describes a procedure to facilitate acceptance by regulatory authorities of pharmacopoeial test methods (referred to in the draft guidance as analytical procedures and/or acceptance criteria (APAC)) for use in the three ICH regions. The draft guidance is intended to facilitate regulatory acceptance of these proposed test methods and their interchangeability with test methods contained in the local regional pharmacopoeias, thus avoiding redundant testing and different acceptance criteria in favor of a common testing strategy in each ICH regulatory region. Elsewhere in this issue of theFederal Register, FDA is announcing the availability of a draft guidance entitled ``Q4B Regulatory Acceptance of Analytical Procedures and/or Acceptance Criteria; Annex 1: Residue on Ignition/Sulphated Ash General.''
International Conference on Harmonisation; Draft Guidance on Q4B Regulatory Acceptance of Analytical Procedures and/or Acceptance Criteria; Annex on Residue on Ignition/Sulphated Ash General Chapter; Availability
Document Number: E6-12806
Type: Notice
Date: 2006-08-08
Agency: Food and Drug Administration, Department of Health and Human Services
The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) is announcing the availability of a draft guidance entitled ``Q4B Regulatory Acceptance of Analytical Procedures and/or Acceptance Criteria; Annex 1: Residue on Ignition/Sulphated Ash General.'' The draft guidance was prepared under the auspices of the International Conference on Harmonisation of Technical Requirements for Registration of Pharmaceuticals for Human Use (ICH). The draft guidance provides the outcome of the ICH Q4B evaluation of the Residue on Ignition/Sulphated Ash General Chapter harmonized text from each of the three pharmacopoeias (United States, European, and Japanese) represented by the Pharmacopoeial Discussion Group (PDG). The draft guidance conveys acceptance of the three pharmacopoeial methods by the three ICH regulatory regions and provides specific information regarding the acceptance. The draft guidance is intended to recognize the interchangeability between the local regional pharmacopoeias, thus avoiding redundant testing and different acceptance criteria in favor of a common testing strategy in each regulatory region. Elsewhere in this issue of the Federal Register, FDA is announcing the availability of a draft guidance entitled ``Q4B Regulatory Acceptance of Analytical Procedures and/or Acceptance Criteria.''
Medicare Program; Physicians Referrals to Health Care Entities With Which They Have Financial Relationships; Exceptions for Certain Electronic Prescribing and Electronic Health Records Arrangements
Document Number: 06-6667
Type: Rule
Date: 2006-08-08
Agency: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, Department of Health and Human Services
As required by section 101 of the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA), this final rule creates an exception to the physician self-referral prohibition in section 1877 of the Social Security Act (the Act) for certain arrangements in which a physician receives compensation in the form of items or services (not including cash or cash equivalents) (``nonmonetary remuneration'') that is necessary and used solely to receive and transmit electronic prescription information. In addition, using our separate legal authority under section 1877(b)(4) of the Act, this rule creates a separate regulatory exception for certain arrangements involving the provision of nonmonetary remuneration in the form of electronic health records software or information technology and training services necessary and used predominantly to create, maintain, transmit, or receive electronic health records. These exceptions are consistent with the President's goal of achieving widespread adoption of interoperable electronic health records to improve the quality and efficiency of health care while maintaining the levels of security and privacy that consumers expect.
Medicare and State Health Care Programs: Fraud and Abuse; Safe Harbors for Certain Electronic Prescribing and Electronic Health Records Arrangements Under the Anti-Kickback Statute
Document Number: 06-6666
Type: Rule
Date: 2006-08-08
Agency: Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General, Inspector General Office, Health and Human Services Department, Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services
As required by the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003 (MMA), Public Law 108-173, this final rule establishes a new safe harbor under the Federal anti-kickback statute for certain arrangements involving the provision of electronic prescribing technology. Specifically, the safe harbor would protect certain arrangements involving hospitals, group practices, and prescription drug plan (PDP) sponsors and Medicare Advantage (MA) organizations that provide to specified recipients certain nonmonetary remuneration in the form of hardware, software, or information technology and training services necessary and used solely to receive and transmit electronic prescription information. In addition, in accordance with section 1128B(b)(3)(E) of the Social Security Act (the Act), this final rule creates a separate new safe harbor for certain arrangements involving the provision of nonmonetary remuneration in the form of electronic health records software or information technology and training services necessary and used predominantly to create, maintain, transmit, or receive electronic health records.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.