International Trade Administration September 27, 2013 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents

The Department of Commerce (``Department'') hereby publishes a list of scope rulings and anticircumvention determinations made between April 1, 2013, and June 30, 2013. We intend to publish future lists after the close of the next calendar quarter.

On August 8, 2013, the United States Court of International Trade (``CIT'' or ``Court'') enter final judgments sustaining the Department of Commerce's (``Department'') final results of the remand redeterminations \1\ relating to the fourteenth administrative review of the antidumping duty order on certain corrosion-resistant carbon steel flat products (``CORE'') from the Republic of Korea (``Korea''), pursuant to the CIT's remand orders in Union Steel v. United States, 755 F. Supp. 2d 1304 (CIT 2011) (``Union I''), and United States Steel Corp. v. United States, 759 F. Supp. 2d 1349 (Ct. Int'l Trade 2011) (``U.S. Steel I''). Consistent with the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (``CAFC'') in Timken Co. v. United States, 893 F.2d 337 (Fed. Cir. 1990) (``Timken''), as clarified by Diamond Sawblades Mfrs. Coalition v. United States, 626 F.3d 1374 (Fed. Cir. 2010) (``Diamond Sawblades''), the Department is notifying the public that the final CIT judgments in this case are not in harmony with the Department's final results of administrative review and is amending its final results of the administrative review of the antidumping duty order on CORE from Korea covering the period of review (``POR'') of August 1, 2006 through July 31, 2007, with respect to the weighted-average dumping margin assigned to Union Steel Manufacturing Co., Ltd. (``Union'').