International Trade Administration February 14, 2007 – Federal Register Recent Federal Regulation Documents

Revocation Pursuant to Second Five-Year (“Sunset”) Reviews of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products from Australia, Canada, Japan, and France
Document Number: E7-2566
Type: Notice
Date: 2007-02-14
Agency: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration
As a result of the determinations by the International Trade Commission (``ITC'') that revocation of the antidumping (``AD'') orders on certain corrosion-resistant carbon steel flat products (``CORE'') from Australia, Canada, Japan, and France and the countervailing duty (``CVD'') order on CORE from France would not be likely to lead to a continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States within a reasonably foreseeable time, the Department of Commerce (``the Department'') is publishing this notice of revocation of these AD and CVD orders pursuant to section 751(d)(2) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended (``the Act'').
Continuation Pursuant to Second Five-Year (“Sunset”) Reviews of Antidumping and Countervailing Duty Orders: Certain Corrosion-Resistant Carbon Steel Flat Products from Germany and Korea
Document Number: E7-2565
Type: Notice
Date: 2007-02-14
Agency: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration
As a result of the determinations by the Department of Commerce (``the Department'') and the International Trade Commission (``ITC'') that revocation of the antidumping (``AD'') orders on certain corrosion-resistant carbon steel flat products (``CORE'') from Germany and Korea would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of dumping; that revocation of the countervailing duty (``CVD'') order on CORE from Korea would likely lead to continuation or recurrence of a countervailable subsidy; and that revocation of these AD and CVD orders would likely lead to a continuation or recurrence of material injury to an industry in the United States, the Department is publishing this notice of continuation of these AD and CVD orders.
Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People's Republic of China: Final Results of Changed Circumstances Review and Determination to Revoke Order in Part
Document Number: E7-2564
Type: Notice
Date: 2007-02-14
Agency: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration
On December 20, 2006, the Department of Commerce (``the Department'') published a notice of initiation and preliminary results of an antidumping duty (``AD'') changed circumstances review and intent to revoke, in part, the AD order on wooden bedroom furniture from the People's Republic of China (``PRC''). See Wooden Bedroom Furniture from the People's Republic of China: Notice of Initiation and Preliminary Results of Changed Circumstances Review, and Intent to Revoke Order in Part, 71 FR 76273 (December 20, 2006) (``Initiation and Preliminary Results''). We are now revoking this order in part, with regard to the following product: upholstered beds, as described in footnote 14 in the ``Scope of the Order'' section of this notice, based on the domestic parties' expression of no interest in the relief provided by the order with respect to the imports of upholstered beds, as so described. In its October 26, 2006, submission, the American Furniture Manufacturers Committee for Legal Trade and its individual members (the ``AFMC'') stated that it no longer has any interest in seeking antidumping relief from imports of such upholstered beds with respect to the subject merchandise defined in the ``Scope of the Order'' section below. On January 4, 2007, American Signature Incorporated (``ASI''), an interested party, submitted comments to the Department stating that exclusion of upholstered beds from the order is warranted.
Notice of Final Results of the Ninth Administrative Review of the Antidumping Duty Order on Certain Pasta from Italy
Document Number: E7-2563
Type: Notice
Date: 2007-02-14
Agency: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration
On August 8, 2006, the Department of Commerce (``the Department'') published the preliminary results and partial rescission of the ninth administrative review for the antidumping duty order on certain pasta from Italy. The review covers two manufacturers/ exporters: (1) Atar, S.r.L. (``Atar'') and, (2) Corticella Molini e Pastifici S.p.A. and its affiliate Pasta Combattenti S.p.A. (collectively, ``Corticella/Combattenti''). The period of review (``POR'') is July 1, 2004, through June 30, 2005. Further, requests for review of the antidumping duty order for the following companies were withdrawn: Barilla G.e.R. Fratelli, S.p.A./Barilla Alimentare, S.p.A. (``Barilla''), Moline e Pastificio Tomasello S.r.L. (``Tomasello''), and Pastificio Laporta S.a.s. (``Laporta''). We are rescinding the review with respect to Italpasta/Pasta Berruto S.p.A. (``Italpasta'')\1\ because Italpasta submitted a letter stating that it had no shipments of subject merchandise during the POR. See 19 CFR 351.213(d)(3). Finally, we are rescinding the review with respect to Pastificio Antonio Pallante S.r.L./Industrie Alimentari Molisane, S.r.L./Vitelli Foods, LLC (``Pallante'') because, since the initiation of the current review, the Department has revoked the order in part, with respect to Pallante, effective July 1, 2004.
Dynamic Random Access Memory Semiconductors from the Republic of Korea: Final Results of Countervailing Duty Administrative Review
Document Number: E7-2562
Type: Notice
Date: 2007-02-14
Agency: Department of Commerce, International Trade Administration
On August 11, 2006, the Department of Commerce published in the Federal Register its preliminary results of administrative review of the countervailing duty order on dynamic random access memory semiconductors from the Republic of Korea for the period January 1, 2004, through December 31, 2004. We gave interested parties an opportunity to comment on the preliminary results. Our analysis of the comments received on the preliminary results did not lead to any changes in the net subsidy rate. Therefore, the final results do not differ from the preliminary results. The final net subsidy rate for the reviewed company is listed below in the section entitled ``Final Results of Review.''