BASF Corporation; Availability of a Draft Plant Pest Risk Assessment and Draft Environmental Assessment for Determination of Nonregulated Status of Plant-Parasitic Nematode-Protected and Herbicide Tolerant Soybean, 45955-45956 [2021-17558]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 156 / Tuesday, August 17, 2021 / Notices
mechanisms to audit access attempts
and access granted into these areas.
RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES:
All requests for access to records must
be in writing and should be submitted
to the OASCR FOIA Officer, 1400
Independence Avenue SW, Washington,
DC 20250; or by email at USDAFOIA@
usda.gov. In accordance with 7 CFR part
1, subpart G, § 1.112 (Procedures for
requests pertaining to individual
records in a record system), the request
must include the full name of the
individual making the request; the name
of the system of records; and preference
of inspection, in person or by mail. In
accordance with 7 CFR 1.113, prior to
inspection of the records, the requester
shall present sufficient identification
(e.g., driver’s license, employee
identification card, social security card,
credit cards) to establish that the
requester is the individual to whom the
records pertain. In addition, if an
individual submitting a request for
access wishes to be supplied with
copies of the records by mail, the
requester must include with his or her
request sufficient data for the agency to
verify the requester’s identity.
CONTESTING RECORD PROCEDURES:
Individuals seeking to contest or
amend records maintained in this
system of records must direct their
request to the address indicated in the
‘‘RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES’’
paragraph, above and must follow the
procedures set forth in 7 CFR part 1,
subpart G, § 1.116 (Request for
correction or amendment to record). All
requests must state clearly and
concisely what record is being
contested, the reasons for contesting it,
and the proposed amendment to the
record.
NOTIFICATION PROCEDURES:
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
Individuals may be notified if a record
in this system of records pertains to
them when the individuals request
information utilizing the same
procedures as those identified in the
‘‘RECORD ACCESS PROCEDURES’’
paragraph, above.
EXEMPTIONS PROMULGATED FOR THE SYSTEM:
None.
HISTORY:
None.
[FR Doc. 2021–17569 Filed 8–16–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–9R–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:08 Aug 16, 2021
Jkt 253001
45955
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
notifications-petitions/petitions/
petition-status.
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
Ms.
Cindy Eck, Biotechnology Regulatory
Services, APHIS, 4700 River Road, Unit
147, Riverdale, MD 20737–1236; (301)
851–3892, email: cynthia.a.eck@
usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
authority of the plant pest provisions of
the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7701
et seq.), the regulations in 7 CFR part
340, ‘‘Movement of Organisms Modified
or Produced Through Genetic
Engineering,’’ regulate, among other
things, the importation, interstate
movement, or release into the
environment of organisms modified or
produced through genetic engineering
that are plant pests or pose a plausible
plant pest risk.
The petition for nonregulated status
described in this notice is being
evaluated under the version of the
regulations effective at the time that it
was received. The Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service (APHIS)
issued a final rule, published in the
Federal Register on May 18, 2020 (85
FR 29790–29838, Docket No. APHIS–
2018–0034),1 revising 7 CFR part 340;
however, the final rule is being
implemented in phases. The new
Regulatory Status Review (RSR) process,
which replaces the petition for
determination of nonregulated status
process, became effective on April 5,
2021 for corn, soybean, cotton, potato,
tomato, and alfalfa. The RSR process is
effective for all crops as of October 1,
2021. However, ‘‘[u]ntil RSR is available
for a particular crop . . . APHIS will
continue to receive petitions for
determination of nonregulated status for
the crop in accordance with the [legacy]
regulations at 7 CFR 340.6.’’ (85 FR
29815). This petition for a
determination of nonregulated status is
being evaluated in accordance with the
regulations at 7 CFR 340.6 (2020) as it
was received by APHIS on November
13, 2019.
BASF Corporation (BASF) has
submitted a petition (APHIS Petition
Number 19–317–01p) to APHIS seeking
a determination of nonregulated status
under 7 CFR part 340, for soybean event
GMB151 which has been developed
using genetic engineering for resistance
to the plant-parasitic nematode, soybean
cyst nematode (Heterodera glycines),
and for tolerance to 4hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase
(HPPD-4) inhibitor herbicides. The
petition states that GMB151 soybean is
[Docket No. APHIS–2020–0023]
BASF Corporation; Availability of a
Draft Plant Pest Risk Assessment and
Draft Environmental Assessment for
Determination of Nonregulated Status
of Plant-Parasitic Nematode-Protected
and Herbicide Tolerant Soybean
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
We are advising the public
that the Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service has prepared a draft
plant pest risk assessment and draft
environmental assessment regarding a
request from BASF Corporation seeking
a determination of nonregulated status
for soybean event GMB151, which has
been developed using genetic
engineering for resistance to the plantparasitic nematode, soybean cyst
nematode (Heterodera glycines), and for
tolerance to 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate
dioxygenase (HPPD-4) inhibitor
herbicides. We are making these
documents available for public review
and comment.
DATES: We will consider all comments
that we receive on or before September
16, 2021
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
www.regulations.gov. Enter APHIS–
2020–0023 in the Search field. Select
the Documents tab, then select the
Comment button in the list of
documents.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Send your comment to Docket No.
APHIS–2020–0023, Regulatory Analysis
and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station
3A–03.8, 4700 River Road, Unit 118,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1238.
The petition, draft environmental
assessment, draft plant pest risk
assessment, and any comments we
receive on this docket may be viewed at
www.regulations.gov, or in our reading
room, which is located in Room 1620 of
the USDA South Building, 14th Street
and Independence Avenue SW,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room
hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except holidays. To be
sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 7997039 before coming.
Supporting documents for this
petition are also available on the APHIS
website at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/
aphis/ourfocus/biotechnology/permitsSUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
1 To view the final rule, go to
www.regulations.gov and enter APHIS–2018–0034
in the Search field.
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
45956
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 156 / Tuesday, August 17, 2021 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
unlikely to pose a plant pest risk and,
therefore, should not be regulated under
APHIS’ regulations in 7 CFR part 340.
According to our process 2 for
soliciting public comment when
considering petitions for determination
of nonregulated status of organisms
developed using genetic engineering,
APHIS accepts written comments
regarding a petition once APHIS deems
the petition complete. On May 28, 2020,
APHIS announced in the Federal
Register 3 (85 FR 32004–32005, Docket
No. APHIS–2020–0023) the availability
of the BASF petition for public
comment. APHIS solicited comments on
the petition for 60 days ending July 27,
2020.
APHIS received nine comments
during the comment period. They were
from the agricultural and private
sectors. Five comments generally
supported BASF’s petition, while four
expressed objections to crops developed
or modified through genetic
engineering.
After public comments are received
on a completed petition, APHIS
evaluates those comments and then
provides a second opportunity for
public involvement in our decisionmaking process. According to our public
review process (see footnote 2), the
second opportunity for public
involvement follows one of two
approaches, as described below.
If APHIS decides, based on its review
of the petition and its evaluation and
analysis of comments received during
the 60-day public comment period on
the petition, that the petition involves
an organism that raises no substantive
new issues, APHIS will follow
Approach 1 for public involvement.
Under Approach 1, APHIS prepares and
announces in the Federal Register the
availability of APHIS’ preliminary
regulatory determination along with its
draft EA, preliminary finding of no
significant impact (FONSI), and its draft
plant pest risk assessment (PPRA) for a
30-day public review period. APHIS
will evaluate any information received
related to the petition and its supporting
documents during the 30-day public
review period. If APHIS determines that
no substantive information has been
2 On March 6, 2012, APHIS published in the
Federal Register (77 FR 13258–13260, Docket No.
APHIS–2011–0129) a notice describing our public
review process for soliciting public comments and
information when considering petitions for
determinations of nonregulated status for organisms
developed using genetic engineering. To view the
notice, go to www.regulations.gov and enter APHIS–
2011–0129 in the Search field.
3 To view the notice, its supporting documents,
and the comments that we received, go to
www.regulations.gov and enter APHIS–2020–0023
in the Search field.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:08 Aug 16, 2021
Jkt 253001
received that would warrant APHIS
altering its preliminary regulatory
determination or FONSI, or
substantially change the analysis of
impacts in the EA, our preliminary
regulatory determination will become
final and effective upon notification of
the public through an announcement on
our website. No further Federal Register
notice will be published announcing the
final regulatory determination.
Under Approach 2, if APHIS decides,
based on its review of the petition and
its evaluation and analysis of comments
received during the 60-day public
comment period on the petition, that the
petition involves an organism that raises
substantive new issues, APHIS first
solicits written comments from the
public on a draft EA and draft PPRA for
a 30-day comment period through the
publication of a Federal Register notice.
Then, after reviewing and evaluating the
comments on the draft EA and draft
PPRA and other information, APHIS
will revise the draft PPRA as necessary.
It will then prepare a final EA, and
based on the final EA, a National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
decision document (either a FONSI or a
notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement).
For this petition, we will be following
Approach 2.
As part of our decision-making
process regarding an organism’s
regulatory status, APHIS prepared a
PPRA to assess the plant pest risk of the
organism, and an EA to evaluate
potential impacts on the human
environment. This will provide the
Agency and the public with a review
and analysis of any potential
environmental impacts that may result
if the petition request is approved.
APHIS’ draft PPRA compared the pest
risk posed by soybean event GMB151
with that of the unmodified variety from
which it was derived. The draft PPRA
concluded that soybean event GMB151
is unlikely to pose an increased plant
pest risk compared to the unmodified
soybean.
The draft EA evaluated potential
impacts that may result from the
commercial production of GMB151
soybean, to include potential impacts on
conventional and organic soybean
production; the acreage and area
required for U.S. soybean production;
agronomic practices and inputs; the
physical environment; biological
resources; human health and worker
safety; animal health and welfare; and
socioeconomic impacts. No significant
impacts were identified with the
production and marketing of GMB151
soybean.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
The draft EA was prepared in
accordance with (1) NEPA, as amended
(42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), (2) regulations
of the Council on Environmental
Quality for implementing the
procedural provisions of NEPA (40 CFR
parts 1500–1508), (3) USDA regulations
implementing NEPA (7 CFR part 1b),
and (4) APHIS’ NEPA Implementing
Procedures (7 CFR part 372).
We are making available for a 30-day
review period our draft EA and draft
PPRA. These documents are available as
indicated under ADDRESSES and FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT above.
Copies of these documents may also be
obtained from the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
After the 30-day review period closes,
APHIS will review and evaluate any
information received during the 30-day
review period.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701–7772 and
7781–7786; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 CFR 2.22,
2.80, and 371.3.
Done in Washington, DC, this 11th day of
August 2021.
Michael Watson,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2021–17558 Filed 8–16–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
COMMISSION ON CIVIL RIGHTS
Notice of Public Meetings of the
Minnesota Advisory Committee
U.S. Commission on Civil
Rights.
ACTION: Announcement of meeting.
AGENCY:
Notice is hereby given,
pursuant to the provisions of the rules
and regulations of the U.S. Commission
on Civil Rights (Commission) and the
Federal Advisory Committee Act that
the Minnesota Advisory Committee
(Committee) will hold a meeting via the
online platform WebEx on Tuesday,
August 24, 2021 at 12:00 p.m. Central
Time. The purpose of the meeting is to
discuss a memorandum on civil rights
concerns in the state.
DATES: The meeting will be held on:
• Tuesday, August 24, 2021, at 12:00
p.m. Central Time
Web link: https://civilrights.webex.com/
civilrights/j.php?MTID=
m16213078bd3f943a55c68fe
7491c75ad
Join by phone: 800–360–9505 USA Toll
Free
Access code: 199 660 9075
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David Barreras, Designated Federal
Officer, at dbarreras@usccr.gov or (202)
656–8937.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\17AUN1.SGM
17AUN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 156 (Tuesday, August 17, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 45955-45956]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-17558]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
[Docket No. APHIS-2020-0023]
BASF Corporation; Availability of a Draft Plant Pest Risk
Assessment and Draft Environmental Assessment for Determination of
Nonregulated Status of Plant-Parasitic Nematode-Protected and Herbicide
Tolerant Soybean
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are advising the public that the Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service has prepared a draft plant pest risk assessment and
draft environmental assessment regarding a request from BASF
Corporation seeking a determination of nonregulated status for soybean
event GMB151, which has been developed using genetic engineering for
resistance to the plant-parasitic nematode, soybean cyst nematode
(Heterodera glycines), and for tolerance to 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate
dioxygenase (HPPD-4) inhibitor herbicides. We are making these
documents available for public review and comment.
DATES: We will consider all comments that we receive on or before
September 16, 2021
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to www.regulations.gov.
Enter APHIS-2020-0023 in the Search field. Select the Documents tab,
then select the Comment button in the list of documents.
Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Send your comment to
Docket No. APHIS-2020-0023, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD,
APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road, Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-
1238.
The petition, draft environmental assessment, draft plant pest risk
assessment, and any comments we receive on this docket may be viewed at
www.regulations.gov, or in our reading room, which is located in Room
1620 of the USDA South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue
SW, Washington, DC. Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to
help you, please call (202) 7997039 before coming.
Supporting documents for this petition are also available on the
APHIS website at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/biotechnology/permits-notifications-petitions/petitions/petition-status.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Cindy Eck, Biotechnology
Regulatory Services, APHIS, 4700 River Road, Unit 147, Riverdale, MD
20737-1236; (301) 851-3892, email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the authority of the plant pest
provisions of the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7701 et seq.), the
regulations in 7 CFR part 340, ``Movement of Organisms Modified or
Produced Through Genetic Engineering,'' regulate, among other things,
the importation, interstate movement, or release into the environment
of organisms modified or produced through genetic engineering that are
plant pests or pose a plausible plant pest risk.
The petition for nonregulated status described in this notice is
being evaluated under the version of the regulations effective at the
time that it was received. The Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service (APHIS) issued a final rule, published in the Federal Register
on May 18, 2020 (85 FR 29790-29838, Docket No. APHIS-2018-0034),\1\
revising 7 CFR part 340; however, the final rule is being implemented
in phases. The new Regulatory Status Review (RSR) process, which
replaces the petition for determination of nonregulated status process,
became effective on April 5, 2021 for corn, soybean, cotton, potato,
tomato, and alfalfa. The RSR process is effective for all crops as of
October 1, 2021. However, ``[u]ntil RSR is available for a particular
crop . . . APHIS will continue to receive petitions for determination
of nonregulated status for the crop in accordance with the [legacy]
regulations at 7 CFR 340.6.'' (85 FR 29815). This petition for a
determination of nonregulated status is being evaluated in accordance
with the regulations at 7 CFR 340.6 (2020) as it was received by APHIS
on November 13, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ To view the final rule, go to www.regulations.gov and enter
APHIS-2018-0034 in the Search field.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
BASF Corporation (BASF) has submitted a petition (APHIS Petition
Number 19-317-01p) to APHIS seeking a determination of nonregulated
status under 7 CFR part 340, for soybean event GMB151 which has been
developed using genetic engineering for resistance to the plant-
parasitic nematode, soybean cyst nematode (Heterodera glycines), and
for tolerance to 4-hydroxyphenylpyruvate dioxygenase (HPPD-4) inhibitor
herbicides. The petition states that GMB151 soybean is
[[Page 45956]]
unlikely to pose a plant pest risk and, therefore, should not be
regulated under APHIS' regulations in 7 CFR part 340.
According to our process \2\ for soliciting public comment when
considering petitions for determination of nonregulated status of
organisms developed using genetic engineering, APHIS accepts written
comments regarding a petition once APHIS deems the petition complete.
On May 28, 2020, APHIS announced in the Federal Register \3\ (85 FR
32004-32005, Docket No. APHIS-2020-0023) the availability of the BASF
petition for public comment. APHIS solicited comments on the petition
for 60 days ending July 27, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ On March 6, 2012, APHIS published in the Federal Register
(77 FR 13258-13260, Docket No. APHIS-2011-0129) a notice describing
our public review process for soliciting public comments and
information when considering petitions for determinations of
nonregulated status for organisms developed using genetic
engineering. To view the notice, go to www.regulations.gov and enter
APHIS-2011-0129 in the Search field.
\3\ To view the notice, its supporting documents, and the
comments that we received, go to www.regulations.gov and enter
APHIS-2020-0023 in the Search field.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
APHIS received nine comments during the comment period. They were
from the agricultural and private sectors. Five comments generally
supported BASF's petition, while four expressed objections to crops
developed or modified through genetic engineering.
After public comments are received on a completed petition, APHIS
evaluates those comments and then provides a second opportunity for
public involvement in our decision-making process. According to our
public review process (see footnote 2), the second opportunity for
public involvement follows one of two approaches, as described below.
If APHIS decides, based on its review of the petition and its
evaluation and analysis of comments received during the 60-day public
comment period on the petition, that the petition involves an organism
that raises no substantive new issues, APHIS will follow Approach 1 for
public involvement. Under Approach 1, APHIS prepares and announces in
the Federal Register the availability of APHIS' preliminary regulatory
determination along with its draft EA, preliminary finding of no
significant impact (FONSI), and its draft plant pest risk assessment
(PPRA) for a 30-day public review period. APHIS will evaluate any
information received related to the petition and its supporting
documents during the 30-day public review period. If APHIS determines
that no substantive information has been received that would warrant
APHIS altering its preliminary regulatory determination or FONSI, or
substantially change the analysis of impacts in the EA, our preliminary
regulatory determination will become final and effective upon
notification of the public through an announcement on our website. No
further Federal Register notice will be published announcing the final
regulatory determination.
Under Approach 2, if APHIS decides, based on its review of the
petition and its evaluation and analysis of comments received during
the 60-day public comment period on the petition, that the petition
involves an organism that raises substantive new issues, APHIS first
solicits written comments from the public on a draft EA and draft PPRA
for a 30-day comment period through the publication of a Federal
Register notice. Then, after reviewing and evaluating the comments on
the draft EA and draft PPRA and other information, APHIS will revise
the draft PPRA as necessary. It will then prepare a final EA, and based
on the final EA, a National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) decision
document (either a FONSI or a notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement).
For this petition, we will be following Approach 2.
As part of our decision-making process regarding an organism's
regulatory status, APHIS prepared a PPRA to assess the plant pest risk
of the organism, and an EA to evaluate potential impacts on the human
environment. This will provide the Agency and the public with a review
and analysis of any potential environmental impacts that may result if
the petition request is approved.
APHIS' draft PPRA compared the pest risk posed by soybean event
GMB151 with that of the unmodified variety from which it was derived.
The draft PPRA concluded that soybean event GMB151 is unlikely to pose
an increased plant pest risk compared to the unmodified soybean.
The draft EA evaluated potential impacts that may result from the
commercial production of GMB151 soybean, to include potential impacts
on conventional and organic soybean production; the acreage and area
required for U.S. soybean production; agronomic practices and inputs;
the physical environment; biological resources; human health and worker
safety; animal health and welfare; and socioeconomic impacts. No
significant impacts were identified with the production and marketing
of GMB151 soybean.
The draft EA was prepared in accordance with (1) NEPA, as amended
(42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), (2) regulations of the Council on
Environmental Quality for implementing the procedural provisions of
NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500-1508), (3) USDA regulations implementing NEPA
(7 CFR part 1b), and (4) APHIS' NEPA Implementing Procedures (7 CFR
part 372).
We are making available for a 30-day review period our draft EA and
draft PPRA. These documents are available as indicated under ADDRESSES
and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT above. Copies of these documents
may also be obtained from the person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
After the 30-day review period closes, APHIS will review and
evaluate any information received during the 30-day review period.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701-7772 and 7781-7786; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 CFR
2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
Done in Washington, DC, this 11th day of August 2021.
Michael Watson,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-17558 Filed 8-16-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P
