Agrivida, Inc.; Availability of a Draft Plant Pest Risk Assessment, Draft Environmental Assessment, Preliminary Determination, and Preliminary Finding of No Significant Impact for Determination of Nonregulated Status of Maize Developed Using Genetic Engineering for the Production of Phytase Enzyme, 33208-33209 [2021-13341]
Download as PDF
<![CDATA[
33208
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 119 / Thursday, June 24, 2021 / Notices
the collection of information that such
persons are not required to respond to
the collection of information unless it
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Natural Resources Conservation
Service
Agrivida, Inc.; Availability of a Draft
Plant Pest Risk Assessment, Draft
Environmental Assessment,
Preliminary Determination, and
Preliminary Finding of No Significant
Impact for Determination of
Nonregulated Status of Maize
Developed Using Genetic Engineering
for the Production of Phytase Enzyme
Title: Long Term Contracting.
OMB Control Number: 0578–0013.
Summary of Collection: The Long
Term Contracting regulations at 7 CFR
part 630, and the Conservation program
regulations at 7 CFR 624, 625, 701 set
forth the basic policies, program
provisions, and eligibility requirements
for owners and operators to enter into
and carry out long-term conservation
program contracts with technical
assistance under the various program.
These programs are administered by the
Natural Resources Conservation Service
(NRCS). These programs authorize
federal technical and financial longterm cost sharing assistance for
conservation treatment with eligible
land users and entities. Under the terms
of the agreement, the participant agrees
to apply, or arrange to apply, the
conservation treatment specified in the
conservation plan. In return for this
agreement, Federal financial assistance
payments are made to the land user, or
third party, upon successful application
of the conservation treatment.
Need and Use of the Information:
NRCS will collect information using
several NRCS forms. The forms are
needed to administer NRCS long-term
contracting programs as authorized.
NRCS uses the information to ensure the
proper utilization of program funds.
Description of Respondents:
Individuals or households; Farms; Notfor-profit institutions; State, Local or
Tribal Government.
Number of Respondents: 5,560.
Frequency of Responses: Reporting;
Annually, Other (As required).
Total Burden Hours: 3,085.
Ruth Brown,
Departmental Information Collection
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2021–13258 Filed 6–23–21; 8:45 am]
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
BILLING CODE 3410–16–P
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:19 Jun 23, 2021
Jkt 253001
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
[Docket No. APHIS–2019–0084]
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
We are advising the public
that the Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service has prepared a
preliminary determination of status,
draft plant pest risk assessment, draft
environmental assessment, and
preliminary finding of no significant
impact regarding a request from
Agrivida, Inc., seeking a determination
of nonregulated status for PY203 maize
that has been developed using genetic
engineering for the production of
phytase enzyme. We are making these
documents available for public review
and comment.
DATES: We will consider all comments
that we receive on or before July 26,
2021.
SUMMARY:
You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
www.regulations.gov. Enter APHIS–
2019–0084 in the Search field. Select
the Documents tab, then select the
Comment button in the list of
documents.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Send your comment to Docket No.
APHIS–2019–0084, Regulatory Analysis
and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station
3A–03.8, 4700 River Road, Unit 118,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1238.
The preliminary determination of
status, draft environmental assessment,
draft plant pest risk assessment,
preliminary determination, preliminary
finding of no significant impact, and
any comments we receive on this docket
may be viewed at www.regulations.gov,
or in our reading room, which is located
in Room 1620 of the USDA South
Building, 14th Street and Independence
Avenue SW, Washington, DC. Normal
reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
holidays. To be sure someone is there to
help you, please call (202) 799–7039
before coming.
ADDRESSES:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
Supporting documents for this
petition are also available on the APHIS
website at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/
aphis/ourfocus/biotechnology/permitsnotifications-petitions/petitions/
petition-status.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Cindy Eck, Biotechnology Regulatory
Services, APHIS, 4700 River Road, Unit
147, Riverdale, MD 20737–1236; (301)
851–3892, email: cynthia.a.eck@
usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
authority of the plant pest provisions of
the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7701
et seq.), the regulations in 7 CFR part
340, ‘‘Movement of Organisms Modified
or Produced Through Genetic
Engineering,’’ regulate, among other
things, the importation, interstate
movement, or release into the
environment of organisms modified or
produced through genetic engineering
that are plant pests or pose a plausible
plant pest risk.
The petition for nonregulated status
described in this notice is being
evaluated under the version of the
regulations effective at the time that it
was received. The Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service (APHIS)
issued a final rule, published in the
Federal Register on May 18, 2020 (85
FR 29790–29838, Docket No. APHIS–
2018–0034),1 revising 7 CFR part 340;
however, the final rule is being
implemented in phases. The new
Regulatory Status Review (RSR) process,
which replaces the petition for
determination of nonregulated status
process, became effective on April 5,
2021 for corn, soybean, cotton, potato,
tomato, and alfalfa. The RSR process is
effective for all crops as of October 1,
2021. However, ‘‘[u]ntil RSR is available
for a particular crop. . .APHIS will
continue to receive petitions for
determination of nonregulated status for
the crop in accordance with the [legacy]
regulations at 7 CFR 340.6.’’ (85 FR
29815). This petition for a
determination of nonregulated status is
being evaluated in accordance with the
regulations at 7 CFR 340.6 (2020) as it
was received by APHIS on June 25,
2019.
Agrivida, Inc. (Agrivida) has
submitted a petition (APHIS Petition
Number 19–176–01p) to APHIS seeking
a determination of nonregulated status
under 7 CFR part 340, for PY203 maize
that has been developed using genetic
engineering for the production of
phytase enzyme. The petition states that
such maize is unlikely to pose a plant
1 To view the final rule, go to
www.regulations.gov and enter APHIS–2018–0034
in the Search field.
E:\FR\FM\24JNN1.SGM
24JNN1
Federal Register / Vol. 86, No. 119 / Thursday, June 24, 2021 / Notices
khammond on DSKJM1Z7X2PROD with NOTICES
pest risk and, therefore, should not be
regulated under APHIS’ regulations in 7
CFR part 340.
According to our process 2 for
soliciting public comment when
considering petitions for determination
of nonregulated status of organisms
developed using genetic engineering,
APHIS accepts written comments
regarding a petition once APHIS deems
the petition complete. On April 16,
2020, APHIS announced in the Federal
Register 3 (85 FR 21170–21171, Docket
No. APHIS–2019–0084) the availability
of the Agrivida petition for public
comment. APHIS solicited comments on
the petition for 60 days ending June 15,
2020.
APHIS received 13 comments during
the comment period. They were from
the agricultural, academic, and private
sectors. Eleven comments were in
support of Agrivida’s petition, while
two expressed objections to crops
developed or modified through genetic
engineering in general.
After public comments are received
on a completed petition, APHIS
evaluates those comments and then
provides a second opportunity for
public involvement in our decisionmaking process. According to our public
review process (see footnote 2), the
second opportunity for public
involvement follows one of two
approaches, as described below.
If APHIS decides, based on its review
of the petition and its evaluation and
analysis of comments received during
the 60-day public comment period on
the petition, that the petition involves
an organism that raises no substantive
new issues, APHIS will follow
Approach 1 for public involvement.
Under Approach 1, APHIS prepares and
announces in the Federal Register the
availability of APHIS’ preliminary
regulatory determination along with its
draft EA, preliminary finding of no
significant impact (FONSI), and its draft
plant pest risk assessment (PPRA) for a
30-day public review period. APHIS
will evaluate any information received
related to the petition and its supporting
documents during the 30-day public
review period. If APHIS determines that
no substantive information has been
2 On March 6, 2012, APHIS published in the
Federal Register (77 FR 13258–13260, Docket No.
APHIS–2011–0129) a notice describing our public
review process for soliciting public comments and
information when considering petitions for
determinations of nonregulated status for organisms
developed using genetic engineering. To view the
notice, go to www.regulations.gov and enter APHIS–
2011–0129 in the Search field.
3 To view the notice, its supporting documents,
and the comments that we received, go to
www.regulations.gov and enter APHIS–2019–0084
in the Search field.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
19:19 Jun 23, 2021
Jkt 253001
received that would warrant APHIS
altering its preliminary regulatory
determination or FONSI, or
substantially change the analysis of
impacts in the EA, our preliminary
regulatory determination will become
final and effective upon notification of
the public through an announcement on
our website. No further Federal Register
notice will be published announcing the
final regulatory determination.
Under Approach 2, if APHIS decides,
based on its review of the petition and
its evaluation and analysis of comments
received during the 60-day public
comment period on the petition, that the
petition involves an organism that raises
substantive new issues, APHIS first
solicits written comments from the
public on a draft EA and draft PPRA for
a 30-day comment period through the
publication of a Federal Register notice.
Then, after reviewing and evaluating the
comments on the draft EA and draft
PPRA and other information, APHIS
will revise the draft PPRA as necessary.
It will then prepare a final EA, and
based on the final EA, a National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA)
decision document (either a FONSI or a
notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement).
For this petition, we will be following
Approach 1.
As part of our decision-making
process regarding an organism’s
regulatory status, APHIS prepared a
PPRA to assess the plant pest risk of the
organism, and an EA to evaluate
potential impacts on the human
environment. This will provide the
Agency and the public with a review
and analysis of any potential
environmental impacts that may result
if the petition request is approved.
APHIS’ draft PPRA compared the pest
risk posed by the Maize Event PY203
with that of the unmodified variety from
which it was derived. The draft PPRA
concluded that PY203 maize is unlikely
to pose an increased plant pest risk
compared to the unmodified corn.4
The draft EA evaluated potential
impacts that may result from the
commercial production of PY203 maize,
to include potential impacts on
conventional and organic corn
production; the acreage and area
required for U.S. corn production;
agronomic practices and inputs; the
physical environment; biological
resources; human health and worker
safety; animal health and welfare; and
socioeconomic impacts. No significant
4 Maize is the botanical term used globally for the
cereal plant Zea mays. In the United States maize
is commonly referred to as corn. Both terms are
used interchangeably in this document.
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
33209
impacts were identified with the
production and marketing of PY203
maize.
The draft EA was prepared in
accordance with (1) NEPA, as amended
(42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), (2) regulations
of the Council on Environmental
Quality for implementing the
procedural provisions of NEPA (40 CFR
parts 1500–1508), (3) USDA regulations
implementing NEPA (7 CFR part 1b),
and (4) APHIS’ NEPA Implementing
Procedures (7 CFR part 372).
We are making available for a 30-day
review period our preliminary
determination, draft EA, preliminary
FONSI, and draft PPRA. The
preliminary determination, draft EA,
preliminary FONSI, and draft PPRA are
available as indicated under ADDRESSES
and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
above. Copies of these documents may
also be obtained from the person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
After the 30-day review period closes,
APHIS will review and evaluate any
information received during the 30-day
review period.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701–7772 and 7781–
7786; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and
371.3.
Done in Washington, DC, this 15th day of
June 2021.
Michael Watson,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2021–13341 Filed 6–23–21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Federal Crop Insurance Corporation
[Docket No. FCIC–21–0006]
Notice of Request for Renewal and
Revision of the Currently Approved
Information Collection
Federal Crop Insurance
Corporation, USDA.
ACTION: Renewal and revision of the
currently approved information
collection.
AGENCY:
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Farm Service Agency (FSA) and Risk
Management Agency (RMA) are
requesting comments from all interested
individuals and organizations on a
revision of a currently approved
paperwork package associated with the
Acreage and Crop Reporting
Streamlining Initiative (ACRSI).
DATES: Written comments on this notice
will be accepted until close of business
August 23, 2021.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\24JNN1.SGM
24JNN1
]]>Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 86, Number 119 (Thursday, June 24, 2021)]
[Notices]
[Pages 33208-33209]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2021-13341]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
[Docket No. APHIS-2019-0084]
Agrivida, Inc.; Availability of a Draft Plant Pest Risk
Assessment, Draft Environmental Assessment, Preliminary Determination,
and Preliminary Finding of No Significant Impact for Determination of
Nonregulated Status of Maize Developed Using Genetic Engineering for
the Production of Phytase Enzyme
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are advising the public that the Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service has prepared a preliminary determination of status,
draft plant pest risk assessment, draft environmental assessment, and
preliminary finding of no significant impact regarding a request from
Agrivida, Inc., seeking a determination of nonregulated status for
PY203 maize that has been developed using genetic engineering for the
production of phytase enzyme. We are making these documents available
for public review and comment.
DATES: We will consider all comments that we receive on or before July
26, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to www.regulations.gov.
Enter APHIS-2019-0084 in the Search field. Select the Documents tab,
then select the Comment button in the list of documents.
Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Send your comment to
Docket No. APHIS-2019-0084, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD,
APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road, Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-
1238.
The preliminary determination of status, draft environmental
assessment, draft plant pest risk assessment, preliminary
determination, preliminary finding of no significant impact, and any
comments we receive on this docket may be viewed at
www.regulations.gov, or in our reading room, which is located in Room
1620 of the USDA South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue
SW, Washington, DC. Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to
help you, please call (202) 799-7039 before coming.
Supporting documents for this petition are also available on the
APHIS website at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/biotechnology/permits-notifications-petitions/petitions/petition-status.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Cindy Eck, Biotechnology
Regulatory Services, APHIS, 4700 River Road, Unit 147, Riverdale, MD
20737-1236; (301) 851-3892, email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the authority of the plant pest
provisions of the Plant Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7701 et seq.), the
regulations in 7 CFR part 340, ``Movement of Organisms Modified or
Produced Through Genetic Engineering,'' regulate, among other things,
the importation, interstate movement, or release into the environment
of organisms modified or produced through genetic engineering that are
plant pests or pose a plausible plant pest risk.
The petition for nonregulated status described in this notice is
being evaluated under the version of the regulations effective at the
time that it was received. The Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service (APHIS) issued a final rule, published in the Federal Register
on May 18, 2020 (85 FR 29790-29838, Docket No. APHIS-2018-0034),\1\
revising 7 CFR part 340; however, the final rule is being implemented
in phases. The new Regulatory Status Review (RSR) process, which
replaces the petition for determination of nonregulated status process,
became effective on April 5, 2021 for corn, soybean, cotton, potato,
tomato, and alfalfa. The RSR process is effective for all crops as of
October 1, 2021. However, ``[u]ntil RSR is available for a particular
crop. . .APHIS will continue to receive petitions for determination of
nonregulated status for the crop in accordance with the [legacy]
regulations at 7 CFR 340.6.'' (85 FR 29815). This petition for a
determination of nonregulated status is being evaluated in accordance
with the regulations at 7 CFR 340.6 (2020) as it was received by APHIS
on June 25, 2019.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ To view the final rule, go to www.regulations.gov and enter
APHIS-2018-0034 in the Search field.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Agrivida, Inc. (Agrivida) has submitted a petition (APHIS Petition
Number 19-176-01p) to APHIS seeking a determination of nonregulated
status under 7 CFR part 340, for PY203 maize that has been developed
using genetic engineering for the production of phytase enzyme. The
petition states that such maize is unlikely to pose a plant
[[Page 33209]]
pest risk and, therefore, should not be regulated under APHIS'
regulations in 7 CFR part 340.
According to our process \2\ for soliciting public comment when
considering petitions for determination of nonregulated status of
organisms developed using genetic engineering, APHIS accepts written
comments regarding a petition once APHIS deems the petition complete.
On April 16, 2020, APHIS announced in the Federal Register \3\ (85 FR
21170-21171, Docket No. APHIS-2019-0084) the availability of the
Agrivida petition for public comment. APHIS solicited comments on the
petition for 60 days ending June 15, 2020.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ On March 6, 2012, APHIS published in the Federal Register
(77 FR 13258-13260, Docket No. APHIS-2011-0129) a notice describing
our public review process for soliciting public comments and
information when considering petitions for determinations of
nonregulated status for organisms developed using genetic
engineering. To view the notice, go to www.regulations.gov and enter
APHIS-2011-0129 in the Search field.
\3\ To view the notice, its supporting documents, and the
comments that we received, go to www.regulations.gov and enter
APHIS-2019-0084 in the Search field.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
APHIS received 13 comments during the comment period. They were
from the agricultural, academic, and private sectors. Eleven comments
were in support of Agrivida's petition, while two expressed objections
to crops developed or modified through genetic engineering in general.
After public comments are received on a completed petition, APHIS
evaluates those comments and then provides a second opportunity for
public involvement in our decision-making process. According to our
public review process (see footnote 2), the second opportunity for
public involvement follows one of two approaches, as described below.
If APHIS decides, based on its review of the petition and its
evaluation and analysis of comments received during the 60-day public
comment period on the petition, that the petition involves an organism
that raises no substantive new issues, APHIS will follow Approach 1 for
public involvement. Under Approach 1, APHIS prepares and announces in
the Federal Register the availability of APHIS' preliminary regulatory
determination along with its draft EA, preliminary finding of no
significant impact (FONSI), and its draft plant pest risk assessment
(PPRA) for a 30-day public review period. APHIS will evaluate any
information received related to the petition and its supporting
documents during the 30-day public review period. If APHIS determines
that no substantive information has been received that would warrant
APHIS altering its preliminary regulatory determination or FONSI, or
substantially change the analysis of impacts in the EA, our preliminary
regulatory determination will become final and effective upon
notification of the public through an announcement on our website. No
further Federal Register notice will be published announcing the final
regulatory determination.
Under Approach 2, if APHIS decides, based on its review of the
petition and its evaluation and analysis of comments received during
the 60-day public comment period on the petition, that the petition
involves an organism that raises substantive new issues, APHIS first
solicits written comments from the public on a draft EA and draft PPRA
for a 30-day comment period through the publication of a Federal
Register notice. Then, after reviewing and evaluating the comments on
the draft EA and draft PPRA and other information, APHIS will revise
the draft PPRA as necessary. It will then prepare a final EA, and based
on the final EA, a National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) decision
document (either a FONSI or a notice of intent to prepare an
environmental impact statement).
For this petition, we will be following Approach 1.
As part of our decision-making process regarding an organism's
regulatory status, APHIS prepared a PPRA to assess the plant pest risk
of the organism, and an EA to evaluate potential impacts on the human
environment. This will provide the Agency and the public with a review
and analysis of any potential environmental impacts that may result if
the petition request is approved.
APHIS' draft PPRA compared the pest risk posed by the Maize Event
PY203 with that of the unmodified variety from which it was derived.
The draft PPRA concluded that PY203 maize is unlikely to pose an
increased plant pest risk compared to the unmodified corn.\4\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ Maize is the botanical term used globally for the cereal
plant Zea mays. In the United States maize is commonly referred to
as corn. Both terms are used interchangeably in this document.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The draft EA evaluated potential impacts that may result from the
commercial production of PY203 maize, to include potential impacts on
conventional and organic corn production; the acreage and area required
for U.S. corn production; agronomic practices and inputs; the physical
environment; biological resources; human health and worker safety;
animal health and welfare; and socioeconomic impacts. No significant
impacts were identified with the production and marketing of PY203
maize.
The draft EA was prepared in accordance with (1) NEPA, as amended
(42 U.S.C. 4321 et seq.), (2) regulations of the Council on
Environmental Quality for implementing the procedural provisions of
NEPA (40 CFR parts 1500-1508), (3) USDA regulations implementing NEPA
(7 CFR part 1b), and (4) APHIS' NEPA Implementing Procedures (7 CFR
part 372).
We are making available for a 30-day review period our preliminary
determination, draft EA, preliminary FONSI, and draft PPRA. The
preliminary determination, draft EA, preliminary FONSI, and draft PPRA
are available as indicated under ADDRESSES and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT above. Copies of these documents may also be obtained from the
person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
After the 30-day review period closes, APHIS will review and
evaluate any information received during the 30-day review period.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701-7772 and 7781-7786; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7
CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
Done in Washington, DC, this 15th day of June 2021.
Michael Watson,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2021-13341 Filed 6-23-21; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P
