Notice of Proposed Revision To Import Requirements for the Importation of Fresh Citrus Fruit From Australia Into the United States, 81869-81871 [2020-27803]
Download as PDF
81869
Notices
Federal Register
Vol. 85, No. 243
Thursday, December 17, 2020
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains documents other than rules or
proposed rules that are applicable to the
public. Notices of hearings and investigations,
committee meetings, agency decisions and
rulings, delegations of authority, filing of
petitions and applications and agency
statements of organization and functions are
examples of documents appearing in this
section.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Submission for OMB Review;
Comment Request
December 14, 2020.
The Department of Agriculture has
submitted the following information
collection requirement(s) to OMB for
review and clearance under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995,
Public Law 104–13. Comments are
requested regarding; whether the
collection of information is necessary
for the proper performance of the
functions of the agency, including
whether the information will have
practical utility; the accuracy of the
agency’s estimate of burden including
the validity of the methodology and
assumptions used; ways to enhance the
quality, utility and clarity of the
information to be collected; and ways to
minimize the burden of the collection of
information on those who are to
respond, including through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology.
Comments regarding this information
collection received by January 19, 2021
will be considered. Written comments
and recommendations for the proposed
information collection should be
submitted within 30 days of the
publication of this notice on the
following website www.reginfo.gov/
public/do/PRAMain. Find this
particular information collection by
selecting ‘‘Currently under 30-day
Review—Open for Public Comments’’ or
by using the search function.
An agency may not conduct or
sponsor a collection of information
unless the collection of information
displays a currently valid OMB control
number and the agency informs
potential persons who are to respond to
the collection of information that such
persons are not required to respond to
the collection of information unless it
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:52 Dec 16, 2020
Jkt 253001
displays a currently valid OMB control
number.
Food and Nutrition Service
Title: School Food Purchase Study IV
(SFPS–IV).
OMB Control Number: 0584–0471.
Summary of Collection: This study is
the fourth in a series of studies designed
to provide statistically valid national
estimates of food acquisitions (both
purchased foods and USDA Foods)
made by school food authorities (SFAs)
participating in the Federally supported
National School Lunch Program (NSLP)
and School Breakfast Program (SBP). In
the decade following the release of the
third School Food Purchase Study
(SFPS III) report, the school nutrition
environment has undergone
considerable changes. Key among them
are the provisions of the Healthy,
Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 (Pub. L.
111–296) which required updated
nutrition standards for the NSLP and
SBP. These standards require meals to
include greater quantities of fruits and
vegetables, whole grains, and low-fat
dairy and reduced sodium. These
changes have affected the purchasing
practices of SFAs in terms of the types,
volume, and cost of foods. This study is
restricted to public SFAs to allow for
direct comparisons of the results (i.e.,
changes in the mix of acquired foods) to
the prior study, SFPS III, which was
conducted in SY 2009–2010. In
addition, the study will describe food
purchase practices of SFAs so that
information associated with food
purchasing efficiency can be provided
to all SFAs.
Need and Use of the Information:
SFPS–IV will provide updated national
estimates of school food authority (SFA)
food acquisitions (commercial
purchases and USDA Foods) and a
description and analysis of food
purchase practices in SY 2021–2022. In
addition, the study will assess changes
in food acquisitions and purchase
practices since SFPS–III, to provide
important information about the impact
of updated nutrition standards for meals
and nonprogram (competitive) foods,
and other changes made to the school
meal programs following the Healthy,
Hunger-Free Kids Act of 2010 (HHFKA).
SFPS–IV will provide Federal, State,
and local policymakers with current
information about how Federally
sponsored school meal programs are
operating since the last study more than
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
10 years ago. Information about food
buying efficiencies will be useful for
SFAs as they strive to maximize
available resources and improve food
service operations. This study will
include State Directors (Child Nutrition
and State Distributing Agencies), SFA
Directors, as well as food vendors and
food service management companies
(FSMCs).
Description of Respondents: State,
Local, or Tribal Government and
Business or Other-for-Profit.
Number of Respondents: 760.
Frequency of Responses: Reporting:
On occasion.
Total Burden Hours: 4,942.
Ruth Brown,
Departmental Information Collection
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2020–27779 Filed 12–16–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
[Docket No. APHIS–2018–0078]
Notice of Proposed Revision To Import
Requirements for the Importation of
Fresh Citrus Fruit From Australia Into
the United States
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
We are advising the public
that we have prepared a pest risk
analysis and treatment evaluation
document relative to the importation
into the United States of citrus fruit
from additional areas of production in
Australia. Based on the findings of these
documents, we are proposing to
authorize the importation of citrus fruit
from additional areas of production in
Australia, and revise the conditions
under which citrus fruit from
authorized areas of production in
Australia may be imported into the
United States. We are making the pest
risk analysis and treatment evaluation
document available to the public for
review and comment.
DATES: We will consider all comments
that we receive on or before February
16, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\17DEN1.SGM
17DEN1
81870
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 243 / Thursday, December 17, 2020 / Notices
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2018-0078.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Send your comment to Docket No.
APHIS–2018–0078, Regulatory Analysis
and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station
3A–03.8, 4700 River Road, Unit 118,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1238.
Supporting documents and any
comments we receive on this docket
may be viewed at https://
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2018-0078 or
in our reading room, which is located in
Room 1620 of the USDA South
Building, 14th Street and Independence
Avenue SW, Washington, DC. Normal
reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
holidays. To be sure someone is there to
help you, please call (202) 799–7039
before coming.
Mr.
Tony Roma´n, Senior Regulatory Policy
Specialist, Regulatory Coordination and
Compliance, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River
Road, Unit 133, Riverdale, MD 20737–
1231; (301) 851–2242.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Under the
regulations in ‘‘Subpart L—Fruits and
Vegetables’’ (7 CFR 319.56–1 through
319.56–12, referred to below as the
regulations), the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service (APHIS)
prohibits or restricts the importation of
fruits and vegetables into the United
States from certain parts of the world to
prevent plant pests from being
introduced into or disseminated within
the United States.
Section 319.56–4 of the regulations
provides the requirements for
authorizing the new importation of
fruits and vegetables into the United
States, as well as revising existing
requirements for the importation of
fruits and vegetables. Paragraph (c) of
that section provides that the name and
origin of all fruits and vegetables
authorized importation into the United
States, as well as the requirements for
their importation, are listed on the
internet in APHIS’ Fruits and Vegetables
Import Requirements database, or
FAVIR (https://epermits.aphis.usda.gov/
manual). It also provides that, if the
Administrator determines that any of
the phytosanitary measures required for
the importation of a particular fruit or
vegetable are no longer necessary to
reasonably mitigate the plant pest risk
posed by the fruit or vegetable, APHIS
will publish a notice in the Federal
Register making its pest risk analysis
and determination available for public
comment.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:52 Dec 16, 2020
Jkt 253001
Citrus fruit from Australia is currently
listed in FAVIR as a fruit authorized
importation into the United States,
subject to the following phytosanitary
measures:
• The citrus fruit must be produced
in Riverina region of New South Wales
District, Riverland region of South
Australia, or Sunraysia region in
Northwest Victoria District.
• The citrus fruit must either
originate from an area within these
approved production areas that is free of
the fruit flies Bactrocera tryoni
(Queensland fruit fly) and Ceratitis
capitata (Medfly), or be treated with
cold treatment in accordance with
treatment schedule T107–d or T107–d–
2 (all citrus other than lemons) or T107–
d–3 (lemons), as well as the relevant
requirements of 7 CFR part 305, which
contains APHIS’ phytosanitary
treatment regulations.
• The citrus fruit must be
accompanied by a phytosanitary
certificate that attests to the production
in a pest-free area of production or that
indicates that cold treatment was
applied to the commodity during transit
to the United States, and that contains
an additional declaration stating that the
fruit in the consignment was subject to
phytosanitary measures to ensure the
consignment is free of Epiphyas
postvittana (light brown apple moth).
• The citrus fruit is subject to
inspection at the port of entry into the
United States.
• Only commercial consignments of
Australian citrus fruit may be imported
into the United States.
• The citrus fruit must be imported
under permit.
APHIS received a request from the
national plant protection organization
(NPPO) of Australia to authorize the
importation of citrus from three
additional areas of Australia: The inland
region of Queensland, the regions that
compose Western Australia, and the
shires of Bourke and Narromine within
New South Wales District. The NPPO
also asked us to reevaluate whether light
brown apple moth could follow the
pathway of citrus fruit from Australia
into the United States.
In response to Australia’s request, we
have prepared a pest risk assessment
(PRA) to evaluate the pests of
quarantine significance that could
follow the pathway of importation of
fresh citrus from these areas of Australia
into the United States. The PRA also
evaluates whether light brown apple
moth, which exists in the areas, is likely
to follow the pathway of citrus fruit
from the areas into the United States.
Based on the PRA, a commodity import
evaluation document (CIED) was
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
prepared to identify phytosanitary
measures that could be applied to the
importation of citrus fruit from these
additional areas of Australia to mitigate
the pest risk.
We have concluded that citrus can
safely be imported from these additional
areas of Australia into the United States,
using the following phytosanitary
measures:
• The citrus must either originate
from an area within these approved
production areas that is free of the fruit
flies Queensland fruit fly, Medfly, and/
or Bactrocera neohumeralis (Lesser
Queensland fruit fly), or be treated with
cold treatment for the relevant fruit
flies. If the area has Medfly but is free
of Queensland fruit fly and Lesser
Queensland fruit fly, treatment schedule
T107–a may be used. If the area has
Queensland fruit fly or Lesser
Queensland fruit fly, treatment
schedules T107–d–2 or T107–d–3 must
be used. We have prepared a treatment
evaluation document (TED) that
determines that these two schedules are
effective for Lesser Queensland fruit fly
on Australian citrus.
• The citrus must be accompanied by
a phytosanitary certificate that attests to
the production in a pest-free area of
production or that indicates that cold
treatment was applied to the commodity
during transit to the United States. We
are not requiring an additional
declaration for light brown apple moth
because the PRA considers this pest
unlikely to follow the pathway on citrus
fruit from these areas. We are also
proposing to remove the additional
declaration requirement for light brown
apple moth for the importation of citrus
fruit from other approved areas of
Australia.
• The citrus is subject to inspection at
the port of entry into the United States.
• Only commercial consignments of
Australian citrus may be imported into
the United States.
• An operational work plan that
details the requirements under which
citrus will be safely imported is in
place.
• The citrus fruit must be imported
under permit.
Therefore, in accordance with
§ 319.56–4(c)(3), we are announcing the
availability of our PRA and CIED for
public review and comment. Those
documents, as well as a description of
the economic considerations associated
with the importation of fresh citrus fruit
from these additional areas of Australia
and the TED, may be viewed on the
Regulations.gov website or in our
reading room (see ADDRESSES above for
a link to Regulations.gov and
information on the location and hours of
E:\FR\FM\17DEN1.SGM
17DEN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 243 / Thursday, December 17, 2020 / Notices
the reading room). You may request
paper copies of these documents by
calling or writing to the person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. Please refer to the subject of
the analysis you wish to review when
requesting copies.
After reviewing any comments we
receive, we will announce our decision
regarding whether to revise the
requirements for the importation of
citrus fruit from Australia in a
subsequent notice. If the overall
conclusions of our analysis and the
Administrator’s determination of risk
remain unchanged following our
consideration of the comments, then we
will revise the requirements for the
importation of citrus fruit from
Australia in accordance with this notice.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1633, 7701–7772, and
7781–7786; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 7 CFR
2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
Done in Washington, DC, this 14th day of
December 2020.
Michael Watson,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2020–27803 Filed 12–16–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Natural Resources Conservation
Service
[Docket No. NRCS–2020–0009]
Guidance for Identification of
Nonindustrial Private Forest Land
(NIPF)
Natural Resources
Conservation Service (NRCS), U.S.
Department of Agriculture (USDA).
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
NRCS is requesting input
about guidance it intends to provide its
agency staff concerning the
identification of NIPF for NRCS
conservation programs. NRCS welcomes
input from the public prior to NRCS
incorporating the guidance into the
NRCS conservation program manual.
This guidance will be used by staff to
identify NIPF and relates to eligibility
for certain NRCS programs.
DATES: Comment Date: We will consider
comments received by January 19, 2021.
ADDRESSES: We invite you to submit
comments on this notice. You may
submit comments through the:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov and search
for Docket ID NRCS–2020–0009. Follow
the online instructions for submitting
comments.
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
18:52 Dec 16, 2020
Jkt 253001
All comments will be available on
https://www.regulations.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Martha Joseph; (814) 203–5562;
martha.joseph@usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
NRCS is one of the USDA agencies
that identifies nonindustrial private
forest land (NIPF) for program
enrollment. In particular, NRCS
identifies NIPF for enrollment in the
Agricultural Conservation Easement
Program (ACEP), the Conservation
Stewardship Program (CSP), the
Environmental Quality Incentives
Program (EQIP), and the Regional
Conservation Partnership Program
(RCPP).
Identification for NIPF enrollment
under these NRCS programs is based
upon section 1201(18) of the Food
Security Act of 1985 (the 1985 Farm
Bill), which defines NIPF as rural land,
as determined by the Secretary, that:
• Has existing tree cover or is suitable
for growing trees; and
• Is owned by any nonindustrial
private individual, group, association,
corporation, Indian Tribe, or other
private legal entity that has definitive
decision-making authority over the
land.
NRCS recently attempted to clarify
how it identifies NIPF for program
enrollment in the fiscal years 2020 and
2021 RCPP Announcement for Program
Funding (https://www.grants.gov/web/
grants/viewopportunity.html?oppId=328578), by
summarizing language from the USDA
Forest Service’s Forest Inventory &
Analysis (FIA) glossary. NRCS used text
that specified NIPF does not encompass
industrial lands but the attempted
clarification resulted in further
confusion. After becoming aware of the
confusion, the NRCS Acting Chief
identified during a House Agriculture
Committee hearing, on October 1, 2020,
that NRCS would welcome input from
stakeholders about how NRCS identifies
NIPF, which is the purpose of this
notice.
Identification of Land as NIPF
NRCS identifies NIPF as defined by
the 1985 Farm Bill and program
regulations. To make the identification,
NRCS examines the components of the
definition to determine if the land can
be identified as NIPF, as explained
below. In its identification, NRCS must
also ensure that such identification is
consistent with how other USDA
agencies identify NIPF under identical
or similar program definitions.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
81871
In order to determine whether land
offered for enrollment meets land
eligibility criteria, NRCS must identify
whether the land is ‘‘rural land’’ that
‘‘has existing tree cover or is suitable for
growing trees’’ and whether the land is
owned by ‘‘a nonindustrial private
landowner.’’ NRCS has long identified
land use in accordance with its National
Resources Inventory (NRI). The NRI
provides updated information about the
status, condition, and trends of land,
soil, water, and related resources on
U.S. non-Federal lands, and identifies
the four primary land types (forest,
rangeland, cropland, and pasture) of
non-Federal rural land. In particular, the
NRI defines forest land as follows:
Forest land. A land cover/use category
that is at least 10 percent stocked by
single-stemmed woody species of any
size that will be at least 4 meters (13
feet) tall at maturity. Also included is
land bearing evidence of natural
regeneration of tree cover (cut over
forest or abandoned farmland) and not
currently developed for non-forest use.
Ten percent stocked, when viewed from
a vertical direction, equates to an areal
canopy cover of leaves and branches of
25 percent or greater. The minimum
area for classification as forest land is 1
acre, and the area must be at least 100
feet wide. See Glossary, 2017 National
Resources Inventory, p. 8–3.
The NRI identification of forest land
is consistent with how both the USDA
Farm Service Agency (FSA) and Forest
Service identify forest land for NIPF
purposes, with some slight differences
such as the Forest Service requires a
canopy cover or crown cover of only 10
percent and a minimum area that is at
least 120 feet wide.
The landowner component of NIPF
identification is more complex as it
relates to identification of whether the
forest land is owned by a ‘‘nonindustrial
private individual, group, association,
corporation, Indian [T]ribe, or other
private legal entity that has definitive
decision-making authority over the
land.’’ FSA specifies in its Emergency
Forest Restoration Program that owners
or lessees principally engaged in the
primary processing of raw wood
products are excluded from the
definition of an owner of nonindustrial
private forest. NRCS refers to this
criterion as the ‘‘mill status’’ criterion
(that is, whether or not the applicant
owns a wood-processing facility on their
land).
The Forest Service identifies
industrial versus nonindustrial private
forest landowners for its FIA with
reference to several factors that reflect
current trends in the forestry industry.
In particular, the Forest Service
E:\FR\FM\17DEN1.SGM
17DEN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 243 (Thursday, December 17, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 81869-81871]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-27803]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
[Docket No. APHIS-2018-0078]
Notice of Proposed Revision To Import Requirements for the
Importation of Fresh Citrus Fruit From Australia Into the United States
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are advising the public that we have prepared a pest risk
analysis and treatment evaluation document relative to the importation
into the United States of citrus fruit from additional areas of
production in Australia. Based on the findings of these documents, we
are proposing to authorize the importation of citrus fruit from
additional areas of production in Australia, and revise the conditions
under which citrus fruit from authorized areas of production in
Australia may be imported into the United States. We are making the
pest risk analysis and treatment evaluation document available to the
public for review and comment.
DATES: We will consider all comments that we receive on or before
February 16, 2021.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
[[Page 81870]]
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2018-0078.
Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Send your comment to
Docket No. APHIS-2018-0078, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD,
APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road, Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-
1238.
Supporting documents and any comments we receive on this docket may
be viewed at https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2018-
0078 or in our reading room, which is located in Room 1620 of the USDA
South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC.
Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 799-7039 before coming.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. Tony Rom[aacute]n, Senior
Regulatory Policy Specialist, Regulatory Coordination and Compliance,
PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River Road, Unit 133, Riverdale, MD 20737-1231; (301)
851-2242.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the regulations in ``Subpart L--Fruits
and Vegetables'' (7 CFR 319.56-1 through 319.56-12, referred to below
as the regulations), the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
(APHIS) prohibits or restricts the importation of fruits and vegetables
into the United States from certain parts of the world to prevent plant
pests from being introduced into or disseminated within the United
States.
Section 319.56-4 of the regulations provides the requirements for
authorizing the new importation of fruits and vegetables into the
United States, as well as revising existing requirements for the
importation of fruits and vegetables. Paragraph (c) of that section
provides that the name and origin of all fruits and vegetables
authorized importation into the United States, as well as the
requirements for their importation, are listed on the internet in
APHIS' Fruits and Vegetables Import Requirements database, or FAVIR
(https://epermits.aphis.usda.gov/manual). It also provides that, if the
Administrator determines that any of the phytosanitary measures
required for the importation of a particular fruit or vegetable are no
longer necessary to reasonably mitigate the plant pest risk posed by
the fruit or vegetable, APHIS will publish a notice in the Federal
Register making its pest risk analysis and determination available for
public comment.
Citrus fruit from Australia is currently listed in FAVIR as a fruit
authorized importation into the United States, subject to the following
phytosanitary measures:
The citrus fruit must be produced in Riverina region of
New South Wales District, Riverland region of South Australia, or
Sunraysia region in Northwest Victoria District.
The citrus fruit must either originate from an area within
these approved production areas that is free of the fruit flies
Bactrocera tryoni (Queensland fruit fly) and Ceratitis capitata
(Medfly), or be treated with cold treatment in accordance with
treatment schedule T107-d or T107-d-2 (all citrus other than lemons) or
T107-d-3 (lemons), as well as the relevant requirements of 7 CFR part
305, which contains APHIS' phytosanitary treatment regulations.
The citrus fruit must be accompanied by a phytosanitary
certificate that attests to the production in a pest-free area of
production or that indicates that cold treatment was applied to the
commodity during transit to the United States, and that contains an
additional declaration stating that the fruit in the consignment was
subject to phytosanitary measures to ensure the consignment is free of
Epiphyas postvittana (light brown apple moth).
The citrus fruit is subject to inspection at the port of
entry into the United States.
Only commercial consignments of Australian citrus fruit
may be imported into the United States.
The citrus fruit must be imported under permit.
APHIS received a request from the national plant protection
organization (NPPO) of Australia to authorize the importation of citrus
from three additional areas of Australia: The inland region of
Queensland, the regions that compose Western Australia, and the shires
of Bourke and Narromine within New South Wales District. The NPPO also
asked us to reevaluate whether light brown apple moth could follow the
pathway of citrus fruit from Australia into the United States.
In response to Australia's request, we have prepared a pest risk
assessment (PRA) to evaluate the pests of quarantine significance that
could follow the pathway of importation of fresh citrus from these
areas of Australia into the United States. The PRA also evaluates
whether light brown apple moth, which exists in the areas, is likely to
follow the pathway of citrus fruit from the areas into the United
States. Based on the PRA, a commodity import evaluation document (CIED)
was prepared to identify phytosanitary measures that could be applied
to the importation of citrus fruit from these additional areas of
Australia to mitigate the pest risk.
We have concluded that citrus can safely be imported from these
additional areas of Australia into the United States, using the
following phytosanitary measures:
The citrus must either originate from an area within these
approved production areas that is free of the fruit flies Queensland
fruit fly, Medfly, and/or Bactrocera neohumeralis (Lesser Queensland
fruit fly), or be treated with cold treatment for the relevant fruit
flies. If the area has Medfly but is free of Queensland fruit fly and
Lesser Queensland fruit fly, treatment schedule T107-a may be used. If
the area has Queensland fruit fly or Lesser Queensland fruit fly,
treatment schedules T107-d-2 or T107-d-3 must be used. We have prepared
a treatment evaluation document (TED) that determines that these two
schedules are effective for Lesser Queensland fruit fly on Australian
citrus.
The citrus must be accompanied by a phytosanitary
certificate that attests to the production in a pest-free area of
production or that indicates that cold treatment was applied to the
commodity during transit to the United States. We are not requiring an
additional declaration for light brown apple moth because the PRA
considers this pest unlikely to follow the pathway on citrus fruit from
these areas. We are also proposing to remove the additional declaration
requirement for light brown apple moth for the importation of citrus
fruit from other approved areas of Australia.
The citrus is subject to inspection at the port of entry
into the United States.
Only commercial consignments of Australian citrus may be
imported into the United States.
An operational work plan that details the requirements
under which citrus will be safely imported is in place.
The citrus fruit must be imported under permit.
Therefore, in accordance with Sec. 319.56-4(c)(3), we are
announcing the availability of our PRA and CIED for public review and
comment. Those documents, as well as a description of the economic
considerations associated with the importation of fresh citrus fruit
from these additional areas of Australia and the TED, may be viewed on
the Regulations.gov website or in our reading room (see ADDRESSES above
for a link to Regulations.gov and information on the location and hours
of
[[Page 81871]]
the reading room). You may request paper copies of these documents by
calling or writing to the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. Please refer to the subject of the analysis you wish to review
when requesting copies.
After reviewing any comments we receive, we will announce our
decision regarding whether to revise the requirements for the
importation of citrus fruit from Australia in a subsequent notice. If
the overall conclusions of our analysis and the Administrator's
determination of risk remain unchanged following our consideration of
the comments, then we will revise the requirements for the importation
of citrus fruit from Australia in accordance with this notice.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1633, 7701-7772, and 7781-7786; 21 U.S.C.
136 and 136a; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
Done in Washington, DC, this 14th day of December 2020.
Michael Watson,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2020-27803 Filed 12-16-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P