State University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry; Petition for Determination of Nonregulated Status for Blight-Resistant Darling 58 American Chestnut, 51008-51009 [2020-18135]
Download as PDF
51008
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 161 / Wednesday, August 19, 2020 / Notices
for OMB approval. All comments will
also become a matter of public record.
Done in Washington, DC, this 13th day of
August 2020.
Mark Davidson,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2020–18136 Filed 8–18–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
[Docket No. APHIS–2020–0030]
State University of New York College
of Environmental Science and
Forestry; Petition for Determination of
Nonregulated Status for BlightResistant Darling 58 American
Chestnut
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
We are advising the public
that the Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service (APHIS) has received
a petition from the State University of
New York College of Environmental
Science and Forestry (ESF) seeking a
determination of nonregulated status for
blight-resistant Darling 58 American
chestnut (Castanea dentata). The
petition has been submitted in
accordance with our regulations
concerning the introduction of certain
genetically engineered organisms. We
are making available for public
comment the ESF petition and
requesting public input regarding
potential issues and impacts that APHIS
should be considering in our evaluation
of the petition.
DATES: We will consider all comments
that we receive on or before October 19,
2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2020-0030.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Send your comment to Docket No.
APHIS–2020–0030, Regulatory Analysis
and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station
3A–03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1238.
The petition and any comments we
receive on this docket may be viewed at
https://www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2020-0030 or
in our reading room, which is located in
room 1141 of the USDA South Building,
14th Street and Independence Avenue
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Aug 18, 2020
Jkt 250001
SW, Washington, DC. Normal reading
room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except
holidays. To be sure someone is there to
help you, please call (202) 799–7039
before coming.
The petition is also available on the
APHIS website at: https://
www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/
biotechnology/permits-notificationspetitions/petitions/petition-status under
APHIS petition 19–309–01p.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Cindy Eck, Biotechnology Regulatory
Services, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit
147, Riverdale, MD 20737–1236; (301)
851–3892, email: cynthia.a.eck@
usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Under the authority of the plant pest
provisions of the Plant Protection Act (7
U.S.C. 7701 et seq.), the regulations in
7 CFR part 340, ‘‘Introduction of
Organisms and Products Altered or
Produced Through Genetic Engineering
Which Are Plant Pests or Which There
Is Reason to Believe Are Plant Pests,’’
regulate, among other things, the
introduction (importation, interstate
movement, or release into the
environment) of organisms and products
altered or produced through genetic
engineering that are plant pests or that
there is reason to believe are plant pests.
Such organisms and plants developed
using genetic engineering are
considered ‘‘regulated articles.’’
The regulations in § 340.6(a) provide
that any person may submit a petition
to the Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service (APHIS) seeking a
determination that an article should not
be regulated under 7 CFR part 340.
Paragraphs (b) and (c) of § 340.6
describe the form that a petition for a
determination of nonregulated status
must take and the information that must
be included in the petition.
APHIS has received a petition (APHIS
Petition Number 19–309–01p) from the
State University of New York College of
Environmental Science and Forestry
(ESF), seeking a determination of
nonregulated status for Darling 58
American chestnut (Castanea dentata).
The ESF petition states that Darling 58
American chestnut has been genetically
engineered for fungal resistance to
chestnut blight caused by Cryphonectria
parasitica and is unlikely to pose a
plant pest risk and, therefore, should
not be a regulated article under APHIS’
regulations in 7 CFR part 340.
As described in the petition,
resistance to this exotic pathogen in
Darling 58 American chestnuts was
enhanced by adding a gene for an
enzyme called oxalate oxidase (OxO).
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
This enzyme has no direct fungicidal
properties, but rather detoxifies oxalic
acid (oxalate) produced by the fungus,
preventing the acid from killing the
chestnut’s tissues, which can lead to
lethal cankers on the tree. In the
presence of OxO, the damage caused by
the oxalate is significantly restricted,
resulting in superficial cankers. For this
reason, the tree can coexist with the
fungus in a manner similar to Asian
chestnut species in the fungus’ natural
range.
Data were gathered on multiple
parameters and used by the applicant to
evaluate agronomic characteristics and
product performance. These and other
data are used by APHIS to determine if
the new variety poses a plant pest risk.
Paragraph (d) of § 340.6 provides that
APHIS will publish a notice in the
Federal Register providing 60 days for
public comment for petitions for a
determination of nonregulated status.
On March 6, 2012, we published in the
Federal Register (77 FR 13258–13260,
Docket No. APHIS–2011–0129) a
notice 1 describing our process for
soliciting public comment when
considering petitions for determinations
of nonregulated status for organisms
developed using genetic engineering. In
that notice, we indicated that APHIS
would accept written comments
regarding a petition once APHIS
deemed it complete.
In accordance with § 340.6(d) of the
regulations and our process for
soliciting public input when
considering petitions for determinations
of nonregulated status for organisms
developed using genetic engineering, we
are publishing this notice to inform the
public that APHIS will accept written
comments regarding the petition for a
determination of nonregulated status
from interested or affected persons for a
period of 60 days from the date of this
notice. The petition is available for
public review and comment, and copies
are available as indicated under
ADDRESSES and FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT above. We are
interested in receiving comments
regarding potential environmental and
interrelated economic issues and
impacts that APHIS may determine
should be considered in our evaluation
of the petition. We are particularly
interested in receiving comments
regarding biological, cultural, or
ecological issues, and we encourage the
submission of scientific data, studies, or
research to support your comments.
1 To view the notice, go to https://
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS2011-0129.
E:\FR\FM\19AUN1.SGM
19AUN1
Federal Register / Vol. 85, No. 161 / Wednesday, August 19, 2020 / Notices
After the comment period closes,
APHIS will review all written comments
received during the comment period
and any other relevant information. Any
substantive issues identified by APHIS
based on our review of the petition and
our evaluation and analysis of
comments will be considered in the
development of our decision-making
documents. As part of our decisionmaking process regarding an organism’s
regulatory status, APHIS prepares a
plant pest risk assessment to assess its
plant pest risk and the appropriate
environmental documentation—either
an environmental assessment (EA) or an
environmental impact statement (EIS)—
in accordance with the National
Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), to
provide the Agency with a review and
analysis of any potential environmental
impacts associated with the petition
request. For petitions for which APHIS
prepares an EA, APHIS will follow our
published process for soliciting public
comment (see footnote 1) and publish a
separate notice in the Federal Register
announcing the availability of APHIS’
EA and plant pest risk assessment.
Should APHIS determine that an EIS
is necessary, APHIS will complete the
NEPA EIS process in accordance with
Council on Environmental Quality
regulations (40 CFR part 1500–1508)
and APHIS’ NEPA implementing
regulations (7 CFR part 372).
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701–7772 and 7781–
7786; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and
371.3.
Done in Washington, DC, this 13th day of
August 2020.
Mark Davidson,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2020–18135 Filed 8–18–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Saguache—Upper Rio Grande
Resource Advisory Committee;
Meeting
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice of meeting.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Saguache—Upper Rio
Grande Resource Advisory Committee
(RAC) will hold a virtual meeting. The
committee is authorized under the
Secure Rural Schools and Community
Self-Determination Act (the Act) and
operates in compliance with the Federal
Advisory Committee Act. The purpose
of the committee is to improve
collaborative relationships and to
jbell on DSKJLSW7X2PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:34 Aug 18, 2020
Jkt 250001
provide advice and recommendations to
the Forest Service concerning projects
and funding consistent with the Act.
RAC information can be found at the
following website: https://
www.fs.usda.gov/main/riogrande/
workingtogether/advisorycommittees.
DATES: The meeting will be held on
Tuesday, September 15, 2020 at 9:00
a.m.
All RAC meetings are subject to
cancellation. For status of meeting prior
to attendance, please contact the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
The meeting will be held
with virtual attendance only. For virtual
meeting information, please see the
website listed under Summary.
Written comments may be submitted
as described under SUPPLEMENTARY
INFORMATION. All comments, including
names and addresses when provided,
are placed in the record and are
available for public inspection and
copying. The public may inspect
comments received at Rio Grande
National Forest Headquarters. Please
call ahead to facilitate entry into the
building.
ADDRESSES:
Goodland, RAC Coordinator, Rio Grande
National Forest Headquarters, 1803
West Highway 160, Monte Vista,
Colorado 81144; by email to
gregg.goodland@usda.gov, or via
facsimile to 719–852–6250.
Meeting Accommodations: If you are
a person requiring reasonable
accommodation, please make requests
in advance for sign language
interpreting, assistive listening devices,
or other reasonable accommodation. For
access to the facility or proceedings,
please contact the person listed in the
section titled FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT. All reasonable
accommodation requests are managed
on a case-by-case basis.
Cikena Reid,
USDA Committee Management Officer.
[FR Doc. 2020–18091 Filed 8–18–20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3411–15–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Forest Service
Information Collection; Significant
Cave Nomination
Forest Service, USDA.
Notice; request for comment.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
AGENCY:
Gregg Goodland, RAC Coordinator, by
phone at 719–588–7045 or via email at
gregg.goodland@usda.gov.
Individuals who use
telecommunication devices for the deaf
(TDD) may call the Federal Information
Relay Service (FIRS) at 1–800–877–8339
between 8:00 a.m. and 8:00 p.m.,
Eastern Standard Time, Monday
through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
purpose of the meeting is to:
1. Review RAC funding, roles,
responsibilities, and operating
guidelines;
2. Allow public input on project
proposals;
3. Allow time for project proposal
presentations;
4. Discuss, recommend, and approve
new Title II projects; and
5. Discuss possible future meetings
and next steps.
The meeting is open to the public.
The agenda will include time for people
to make oral statements of three minutes
or less. Individuals wishing to make an
oral statement should request in writing
by Wednesday, September 9, 2020, to be
scheduled on the agenda. Anyone who
would like to bring related matters to
the attention of the committee may file
written statements with the committee
staff before or after the meeting. Written
comments and requests for time to make
oral comments must be sent to Gregg
ACTION:
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
51009
In accordance with the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995, the
Forest Service is seeking comments
from all interested individuals and
organizations on a new information
collection, Significant Cave
Nominations under the Federal Cave
Resources Protection Act (FCRPA).
DATES: Comments must be received in
writing on or before October 19, 2020 to
be assured of consideration. Comments
received after that date will be
considered to the extent practicable.
ADDRESSES: Written comments
concerning this notice may be submitted
via mail to Minerals and Geology
Management, Attn: Significant Cave
Nomination, 1400 Independence
Avenue, Mail Stop 1126, Washington,
DC 20250.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Cheryl Nabahe, Minerals and Geology
Management, 202–578–2680, by email
at cheryl.nabahe@usda.gov. Individuals
who use telecommunication devices for
the deaf (TDD) may call the Federal
Relay Service (FRS) at 1–800–877–8339
between 8 a.m. and 8 p.m., Eastern
Time, Monday through Friday.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Title: Significant Cave Nomination.
OMB Number: 0596-New.
Expiration Date of Approval: Not
applicable, new request.
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\19AUN1.SGM
19AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 85, Number 161 (Wednesday, August 19, 2020)]
[Notices]
[Pages 51008-51009]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2020-18135]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
[Docket No. APHIS-2020-0030]
State University of New York College of Environmental Science and
Forestry; Petition for Determination of Nonregulated Status for Blight-
Resistant Darling 58 American Chestnut
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are advising the public that the Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service (APHIS) has received a petition from the State
University of New York College of Environmental Science and Forestry
(ESF) seeking a determination of nonregulated status for blight-
resistant Darling 58 American chestnut (Castanea dentata). The petition
has been submitted in accordance with our regulations concerning the
introduction of certain genetically engineered organisms. We are making
available for public comment the ESF petition and requesting public
input regarding potential issues and impacts that APHIS should be
considering in our evaluation of the petition.
DATES: We will consider all comments that we receive on or before
October 19, 2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2020-0030.
Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Send your comment to
Docket No. APHIS-2020-0030, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD,
APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-
1238.
The petition and any comments we receive on this docket may be
viewed at https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2020-0030
or in our reading room, which is located in room 1141 of the USDA South
Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC.
Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 799-7039 before coming.
The petition is also available on the APHIS website at: https://www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/biotechnology/permits-notifications-petitions/petitions/petition-status under APHIS petition 19-309-01p.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Cindy Eck, Biotechnology
Regulatory Services, APHIS, 4700 River Road Unit 147, Riverdale, MD
20737-1236; (301) 851-3892, email: [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Under the authority of the plant pest provisions of the Plant
Protection Act (7 U.S.C. 7701 et seq.), the regulations in 7 CFR part
340, ``Introduction of Organisms and Products Altered or Produced
Through Genetic Engineering Which Are Plant Pests or Which There Is
Reason to Believe Are Plant Pests,'' regulate, among other things, the
introduction (importation, interstate movement, or release into the
environment) of organisms and products altered or produced through
genetic engineering that are plant pests or that there is reason to
believe are plant pests. Such organisms and plants developed using
genetic engineering are considered ``regulated articles.''
The regulations in Sec. 340.6(a) provide that any person may
submit a petition to the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
(APHIS) seeking a determination that an article should not be regulated
under 7 CFR part 340. Paragraphs (b) and (c) of Sec. 340.6 describe
the form that a petition for a determination of nonregulated status
must take and the information that must be included in the petition.
APHIS has received a petition (APHIS Petition Number 19-309-01p)
from the State University of New York College of Environmental Science
and Forestry (ESF), seeking a determination of nonregulated status for
Darling 58 American chestnut (Castanea dentata). The ESF petition
states that Darling 58 American chestnut has been genetically
engineered for fungal resistance to chestnut blight caused by
Cryphonectria parasitica and is unlikely to pose a plant pest risk and,
therefore, should not be a regulated article under APHIS' regulations
in 7 CFR part 340.
As described in the petition, resistance to this exotic pathogen in
Darling 58 American chestnuts was enhanced by adding a gene for an
enzyme called oxalate oxidase (OxO). This enzyme has no direct
fungicidal properties, but rather detoxifies oxalic acid (oxalate)
produced by the fungus, preventing the acid from killing the chestnut's
tissues, which can lead to lethal cankers on the tree. In the presence
of OxO, the damage caused by the oxalate is significantly restricted,
resulting in superficial cankers. For this reason, the tree can coexist
with the fungus in a manner similar to Asian chestnut species in the
fungus' natural range.
Data were gathered on multiple parameters and used by the applicant
to evaluate agronomic characteristics and product performance. These
and other data are used by APHIS to determine if the new variety poses
a plant pest risk.
Paragraph (d) of Sec. 340.6 provides that APHIS will publish a
notice in the Federal Register providing 60 days for public comment for
petitions for a determination of nonregulated status. On March 6, 2012,
we published in the Federal Register (77 FR 13258-13260, Docket No.
APHIS-2011-0129) a notice \1\ describing our process for soliciting
public comment when considering petitions for determinations of
nonregulated status for organisms developed using genetic engineering.
In that notice, we indicated that APHIS would accept written comments
regarding a petition once APHIS deemed it complete.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ To view the notice, go to https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2011-0129.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In accordance with Sec. 340.6(d) of the regulations and our
process for soliciting public input when considering petitions for
determinations of nonregulated status for organisms developed using
genetic engineering, we are publishing this notice to inform the public
that APHIS will accept written comments regarding the petition for a
determination of nonregulated status from interested or affected
persons for a period of 60 days from the date of this notice. The
petition is available for public review and comment, and copies are
available as indicated under ADDRESSES and FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT above. We are interested in receiving comments regarding
potential environmental and interrelated economic issues and impacts
that APHIS may determine should be considered in our evaluation of the
petition. We are particularly interested in receiving comments
regarding biological, cultural, or ecological issues, and we encourage
the submission of scientific data, studies, or research to support your
comments.
[[Page 51009]]
After the comment period closes, APHIS will review all written
comments received during the comment period and any other relevant
information. Any substantive issues identified by APHIS based on our
review of the petition and our evaluation and analysis of comments will
be considered in the development of our decision-making documents. As
part of our decision-making process regarding an organism's regulatory
status, APHIS prepares a plant pest risk assessment to assess its plant
pest risk and the appropriate environmental documentation--either an
environmental assessment (EA) or an environmental impact statement
(EIS)--in accordance with the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA),
to provide the Agency with a review and analysis of any potential
environmental impacts associated with the petition request. For
petitions for which APHIS prepares an EA, APHIS will follow our
published process for soliciting public comment (see footnote 1) and
publish a separate notice in the Federal Register announcing the
availability of APHIS' EA and plant pest risk assessment.
Should APHIS determine that an EIS is necessary, APHIS will
complete the NEPA EIS process in accordance with Council on
Environmental Quality regulations (40 CFR part 1500-1508) and APHIS'
NEPA implementing regulations (7 CFR part 372).
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701-7772 and 7781-7786; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7
CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
Done in Washington, DC, this 13th day of August 2020.
Mark Davidson,
Acting Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2020-18135 Filed 8-18-20; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P