International Sanitary and Phytosanitary Standard-Setting Activities, 64821-64825 [2019-25443]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 227 / Monday, November 25, 2019 / Notices
to participate and to sponsoring
organizations to ensure that they do not
employ as principals any persons who
are disqualified from the program. This
statutory mandate has been
incorporated into § 226.6(c)(7) of the
Program regulations.
Need and Use of the Information: The
Food and Nutrition Service (FNS) uses
forms FNS–843 Report of
Disqualification from Participation—
Institution and Responsible Principals/
Individuals and FNS–844 Report of
Disqualification from Participation—
Individually Disqualified Responsible
Principal/Individual or Day Care Home
Provider to collect and maintain the
disqualification data. The State agencies
use these forms, which are accessed
through a web-based National
Disqualification List (NDL) system, to
collect the contact information and the
disqualification information and reasons
on all individuals and institutions that
have been disqualified and are therefore
ineligible to participate in CACFP. The
information is collected from State
agencies as the disqualifications occur
so that the list is kept current. By
maintaining the web-based system, the
Department ensures program integrity
by making the NDL data available to
sponsoring organizations and State
agencies so that no one who has been
disqualified can participate in CACFP.
Without this data collection, State
agencies would not be able to prevent
individuals and institutions disqualified
in other States from reapplying to
participate in CACFP.
Description of Respondents: State,
Local, or Tribal Government.
Number of Respondents: 56.
Frequency of Responses: Reporting:
On occasion; Other (as needed).
Total Burden Hours: 784.
Ruth Brown,
Departmental Information Collection
Clearance Officer.
[FR Doc. 2019–25530 Filed 11–22–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–30–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
[Docket No. APHIS–2019–0064]
International Sanitary and
Phytosanitary Standard-Setting
Activities
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice and request for
comments.
AGENCY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Nov 22, 2019
Jkt 250001
In accordance with legislation
implementing the results of the Uruguay
Round of negotiations under the General
Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, we are
informing the public of the international
standard-setting activities of the World
Organization for Animal Health, the
Secretariat of the International Plant
Protection Convention, and the North
American Plant Protection Organization,
and we are soliciting public comment
on the standard-setting activities.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2019-0064.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Send your comment to Docket No.
APHIS–2019–0064, Regulatory Analysis
and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station
3A–03.8, 4700 River Road, Unit 118,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1238.
Supporting documents and any
comments we receive on this docket
may be viewed at https://
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2019-0064 or
in our reading room, which is located in
Room 1141 of the USDA South
Building, 14th Street and Independence
Avenue SW, Washington, DC. Normal
reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
holidays. To be sure someone is there to
help you, please call (202) 799–7039
before coming.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For
general information on the topics
covered in this notice, contact Ms.
Jessica Mahalingappa, Associate Deputy
Administrator for International Services,
APHIS, Room 1132, USDA South
Building, 14th Street and Independence
Avenue SW, Washington, DC 20250;
(202) 799–7121.
For specific information regarding
standard-setting activities of the World
Organization for Animal Health, contact
Dr. Michael David, Director,
International Animal Health Standards,
Veterinary Services, APHIS, 4700 River
Road, Unit 33, Riverdale, MD 20737;
(301) 851–3302.
For specific information regarding the
standard-setting activities of the
International Plant Protection
Convention, contact Dr. Marina Zlotina,
IPPC Technical Director, International
Phytosanitary Standards, PPQ, APHIS,
4700 River Road, Unit 130, Riverdale,
MD 20737; (301) 851–2200.
For specific information on the North
American Plant Protection Organization,
contact Ms. Patricia Abad, NAPPO
Technical Director, International
Phytosanitary Standards, PPQ, APHIS,
4700 River Road, Unit 130, Riverdale,
MD 20737; (301) 851–2264.
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64821
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The World Trade Organization (WTO)
was established as the common
international institutional framework for
governing trade relations among its
members in matters related to the
Uruguay Round Agreements. The WTO
is the successor organization to the
General Agreement on Tariffs and
Trade. U.S. membership in the WTO
was approved by Congress when it
enacted the Uruguay Round Agreements
Act (Pub. L. 103–465), which was
signed into law on December 8, 1994.
The WTO Agreements, which
established the WTO, entered into force
with respect to the United States on
January 1, 1995. The Uruguay Round
Agreements Act amended Title IV of the
Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (19
U.S.C. 2531 et seq.). Section 491 of the
Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as
amended (19 U.S.C. 2578), requires the
President to designate an agency to be
responsible for informing the public of
the sanitary and phytosanitary (SPS)
standard-setting activities of each
international standard-setting
organization. The designated agency
must inform the public by publishing an
annual notice in the Federal Register
that provides the following information:
(1) The SPS standards under
consideration or planned for
consideration by the international
standard-setting organization; and (2)
for each SPS standard specified, a
description of the consideration or
planned consideration of that standard,
a statement of whether the United States
is participating or plans to participate in
the consideration of that standard, the
agenda for U.S. participation, if any, and
the agency responsible for representing
the United States with respect to that
standard.
‘‘International standard’’ is defined in
19 U.S.C. 2578b as any standard,
guideline, or recommendation: (1)
Adopted by the Codex Alimentarius
Commission (Codex) regarding food
safety; (2) developed under the auspices
of the World Organization for Animal
Health (OIE, formerly known as the
Office International des Epizooties)
regarding animal health and welfare and
zoonoses; (3) developed under the
auspices of the Secretariat of the
International Plant Protection
Convention (IPPC or the Convention)
and the North American Plant
Protection Organization (NAPPO)
regarding plant health; or (4) established
by or developed under any other
international organization agreed to by
the member countries of the North
American Free Trade Agreement
E:\FR\FM\25NON1.SGM
25NON1
64822
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 227 / Monday, November 25, 2019 / Notices
(NAFTA) or the member countries of the
WTO.
The President, pursuant to
Proclamation No. 6780 of March 23,
1995 (60 FR 15845), designated the
Secretary of Agriculture as the official
responsible for informing the public of
the SPS standard-setting activities of
Codex, OIE, IPPC, and NAPPO. The
United States Department of
Agriculture’s (USDA’s) Food Safety and
Inspection Service (FSIS) informs the
public of Codex standard-setting
activities, and USDA’s Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)
informs the public of OIE, IPPC, and
NAPPO standard-setting activities.
FSIS publishes an annual notice in
the Federal Register to inform the
public of SPS standard-setting activities
for Codex. Codex was created in 1962 by
two United Nations organizations, the
Food and Agriculture Organization and
the World Health Organization. It is the
major international organization for
encouraging international trade in food
and protecting the health and economic
interests of consumers.
APHIS is responsible for publishing
an annual notice of OIE, IPPC, and
NAPPO activities related to
international standards for plant and
animal health and representing the
United States with respect to these
standards. Following are descriptions of
the OIE, IPPC, and NAPPO
organizations and the standard-setting
agenda for each of these organizations.
We have described the agenda that each
of these organizations will address at
their annual general sessions, including
standards that may be presented for
adoption or consideration, as well as
other initiatives that may be underway
at the OIE, IPPC, and NAPPO.
The agendas for these meetings are
subject to change, and the draft
standards identified in this notice may
not be sufficiently developed and ready
for adoption as indicated. Also, while it
is the intent of the United States to
support adoption of international
standards and to participate actively
and fully in their development, it
should be recognized that the U.S.
position on a specific draft standard will
depend on the acceptability of the final
draft. Given the dynamic and interactive
nature of the standard-setting process,
we encourage any persons who are
interested in the most current details
about a specific draft standard or the
U.S. position on a particular standardsetting issue, or in providing comments
on a specific standard that may be under
development, to contact APHIS. Contact
information is provided at the beginning
of this notice under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Nov 22, 2019
Jkt 250001
OIE Standard-Setting Activities
The OIE was established in Paris,
France, in 1924 with the signing of an
international agreement by 28 countries.
It is currently composed of 182
Members, each of which is represented
by a delegate who, in most cases, is the
chief veterinary officer of that country
or territory. The WTO has recognized
the OIE as the international forum for
setting animal health standards,
reporting global animal disease events,
and presenting guidelines and
recommendations on sanitary measures
relating to animal health.
The OIE facilitates intergovernmental
cooperation to prevent the spread of
contagious diseases in animals by
sharing scientific research among its
Members. The major functions of the
OIE are to collect and disseminate
information on the distribution and
occurrence of animal diseases and to
ensure that science-based standards
govern international trade in animals
and animal products. The OIE aims to
achieve these through the development
and revision of international standards
for diagnostic tests, vaccines, and the
safe international trade of animals and
animal products.
The OIE provides annual reports on
the global distribution of animal
diseases, recognizes the free status of
Members for certain diseases,
categorizes animal diseases with respect
to their international significance,
publishes bulletins on global disease
status, and provides animal disease
control guidelines to Members. Various
OIE commissions and working groups
undertake the development and
preparation of draft standards, which
are then circulated to Members for
consultation (review and comment).
Draft standards are revised accordingly
and are presented to the OIE World
Assembly of Delegates (all the Members)
for review and adoption during the
General Session, which meets annually
every May. Adoption, as a general rule,
is based on consensus of the OIE
membership.
The most recent OIE General Session
occurred May 26 to 31, 2019, in Paris,
France. The Deputy Administrator
(a.k.a., Chief Veterinary Officer) for
APHIS’ Veterinary Services program
serves as the official U.S. Delegate to the
OIE at this General Session. Information
about OIE draft Terrestrial and Aquatic
Animal Health Code chapters may be
found on the internet at https://
www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/
animalhealth/export/internationalstandard-setting-activities-oie/
regionalization/ct_international_
standard_setting_activities_oie or by
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
contacting Dr. Michael David (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT above).
OIE Terrestrial and Aquatic Animal
Health Code Chapters Adopted During
the May 2019 General Session
Eleven Code chapters were amended,
rewritten, or newly proposed and
presented for adoption at the General
Session. The following Code chapters
are of particular interest to the United
States:
1. Chapter 1.4., Animal Health
Surveillance. Amendments to chapter
included changes to the use of the terms
‘‘target population’’ and ‘‘study
population.’’
2. Chapter 4.Z., Introduction to
recommendations for the prevention
and control of transmissible animal
diseases. This is a new chapter that has
been reviewed in prior comment cycles
and provides general considerations
when controlling animal diseases.
3. Articles 7.13.4. and 7.13.15.,
Animal welfare and pig production
systems. The United States supported
the adoption of this new chapter in
2018. Minor editorial amendments were
adopted in 2019.
4. Chapter 7.Y., Killing of reptiles for
their skins, meat and other products.
This is a newly adopted chapter that has
been reviewed in prior comment cycles.
5. Chapter 8.14., Infection with rabies
virus. The Code Commission
highlighted the current global priority to
control and eradicate dog-mediated
rabies, and adopted changes to the
chapter that are aligned with that
priority. Additional provisions
addressing wildlife vectors will be
considered in the next revision of the
chapter.
6. Article 14.4.1., Infection with
Chlamydophila abortus (Enzootic
abortion of ewes, ovine chlamydiosis).
The name of the pathogenic agent
changed from Chlamydophila abortus to
Chlamydia abortus.
7. Articles 15.1.1bis, 15.1.2., 15.1.3.,
15.1.16., 15.1.22., 15.1.31., Infection
with African swine fever virus.
Amendments were made to strengthen
the recommendations for testing wild or
feral pigs found dead, road kills,
animals showing abnormal behavior,
and hunted animals sampled in
surveillance programs.
OIE Terrestrial Animal Health Code
Chapters for Upcoming and Future
Review
• Chapter 1.1., Notification of
diseases, infections and infestations,
and provision of epidemiological
information.
E:\FR\FM\25NON1.SGM
25NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 227 / Monday, November 25, 2019 / Notices
• Chapter 1.6., Procedures for selfdeclaration and for official recognition
by the OIE.
• Chapter 3.4., Veterinary legislation.
• Chapter 4.Y., Draft new chapter on
official control programs for listed and
emerging diseases.
• Chapter 7.Z., Draft new chapter on
animal welfare and laying hen
production systems.
• Chapter 10.4., Infection with avian
influenza viruses.
• Chapter 15.2., Infection with
classical swine fever virus.
• Chapter 8.11., Infection with
Mycobacterium tuberculosis complex.
• Chapter 8.15., Infection with Rift
Valley fever virus.
• Article 12.6.6., Infection with
equine influenza.
• Articles 14.7.3. and 14.7.34.,
Infection with peste des petits
ruminants virus.
IPPC Standard-Setting Activities
The IPPC is a multilateral convention
adopted in 1952 to prevent the spread
and introduction of pests of plants and
plant products and to promote
appropriate measures for their control.
The WTO recognizes the IPPC as the
standard setting body for plant health.
Under the IPPC, the understanding of
plant protection encompasses the
protection of both cultivated and noncultivated plants from direct or indirect
injury by plant pests. The IPPC
addresses the following activities:
Developing, adopting, and
implementing international standards
for phytosanitary (plant health)
measures (ISPMs); harmonizing
phytosanitary activities through adopted
standards; facilitating the exchange of
official and scientific information
among contracting parties; and
providing technical assistance to
developing countries that are
contracting parties to the Convention.
The IPPC is deposited within the
Food and Agriculture Organization of
the United Nations and is an
international agreement of 183
contracting parties. National plant
protection organizations (NPPOs), in
cooperation with regional plant
protection organizations, the
Commission on Phytosanitary Measures
(CPM), and the Secretariat of the IPPC,
implement the Convention. The IPPC
continues to be administered at the
national level by plant quarantine
officials, whose primary objective is to
safeguard plant resources from injurious
pests. In the United States, the NPPO is
APHIS’ Plant Protection and Quarantine
(PPQ) program.
The 14th Session of the CPM took
place from April 1 to 5, 2019, in Rome,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Nov 22, 2019
Jkt 250001
Italy, at the Headquarters of the Food
and Agriculture Organization of the
United Nations. The Deputy
Administrator for APHIS’ PPQ program
was the U.S. delegate to the CPM.
The CPM adopted the following
standards at its 2019 meeting. The
United States, represented by the
Deputy Administrator for APHIS’ PPQ
program, participated in deliberations of
these standards. The United States
developed its position on each of these
issues prior to the CPM session, which
were based on APHIS’ analyses and
other relevant information from other
U.S. Government agencies and
interested stakeholders:
• ISPM 5: Glossary of phytosanitary
terms (2019 revisions).
• ISPM 43: Requirements for the use
of fumigation as a phytosanitary
measure.
• Diagnostic protocols (DPs) as
Annexes to ISPM 27: Diagnostic
protocols for regulated pests:
Æ DP 2: Plum pox virus (2018
revisions).
Æ DP 25: Xylella fastidiosa.
Æ DP 26: Austropuccinia psidii.
Æ DP 27: Ips spp.
Æ DP 28: Conotrachelus nenuphar.
Æ DP 29: Bactrocera dorsalis.
The CPM also adopted
Recommendation R08, ‘‘Preparing to use
high-throughput sequencing (HTS)
technologies as a diagnostic tool for
phytosanitary purposes.’’
The CPM added to the IPPC work
program new topics for 13 standards
and 12 tools to implement standards,
which were submitted by the
contracting parties during 2018 call for
topics.
In addition to adopting these plant
health standards, the 2019 Commission
meeting also progressed a number of
plant health initiatives strategically
important to the United States. These
initiatives include endorsing the new
IPPC strategic framework for 2020–2030
to set the top priorities for plant health
and trade into the next decade,
approving an electronic certification
system (ePhyto) implementation plan to
support trade and identifying next steps
for its longer term worldwide
application, developing programs aimed
at improving the use and
implementation of standards around the
world, and planning events and
activities for the International Year of
Plant Health in 2020 to mobilize
worldwide awareness and support for
plant health going into the next decade.
New IPPC Standard-Setting Initiatives,
Including Those Under Development
A number of expert working group
(EWG) meetings or other technical
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64823
consultations took place October 2018
through September 2019 on the topics
listed below. These standard-setting
initiatives are under development and
may be considered for future adoption.
APHIS intends to participate actively
and fully in each of these working
groups. APHIS developed its position
on each of the topics prior to the
working group meetings. The APHIS
position was based on technical
analyses, information from other U.S.
Government agencies, and relevant
scientific information from interested
stakeholders:
• EWG on Audit in the Phytosanitary
Context.
• Technical Panel on Diagnostic
Protocols.
• Technical Panel on Phytosanitary
Treatments.
• Technical Panel for the Glossary.
• Focus Group on Commodity
Standards.
• Sea Container Task Force.
For more detailed information on the
above, contact Dr. Marina Zlotina (see
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
above).
PPQ actively works to achieve broad
participation by States, industry, and
other stakeholders in the development
and use of international and regional
plant health standards, including
through the use of APHIS Stakeholder
Registry notices 1 and the APHIS public
website. Plant health stakeholders are
strongly encouraged to comment on
draft standards, documents, and
specifications during the consultation
periods. In 2019, 13 draft standards
were open for consultation. APHIS posts
links to draft standards on its website as
they become available and provides
information on the due dates for
comments.2 Additional information on
IPPC standards (including the IPPC
work program (list of topics 3), calls for
new standards, experts to serve on
technical panels and other working
groups, proposed phytosanitary
treatments, standard-setting process,
and adopted standards) is available on
the IPPC website.4 For the most current
information on official U.S.
participation in IPPC activities,
including U.S. positions on standards
being considered, contact Dr. Marina
1 To sign up for the Stakeholder Registry, go to:
https://public.govdelivery.com/accounts/
USDAAPHIS/subscriber/new.
2 For more information on the IPPC draft ISPM
consultation: https://www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/
ourfocus/planthealth/international/sa_
phytostandards/ct_draft_standards.
3 IPPC list of topics: https://www.ippc.int/en/coreactivities/standards-setting/list-topics-ippcstandards/.
4 IPPC website: https://www.ippc.int/.
E:\FR\FM\25NON1.SGM
25NON1
64824
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 227 / Monday, November 25, 2019 / Notices
Zlotina (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT above). Those wishing to
provide comments on any of the areas
of work being undertaken by the IPPC
may do so at any time by responding to
this notice (see ADDRESSES above) or by
providing comments through Dr.
Zlotina.
NAPPO Standard-Setting Activities
NAPPO, a regional plant protection
organization created in 1976 under the
IPPC, coordinates the efforts among the
United States, Canada, and Mexico to
protect their plant resources from the
entry, establishment, and spread of
harmful plant pests, while facilitating
intra- and inter-regional trade. As the
NPPO of the United States, APHIS’ PPQ
is the organization officially identified
to participate in NAPPO. Through
NAPPO, APHIS works closely with its
regional counterparts and industries to
develop harmonized regional standards
and approaches for managing pest
threats. NAPPO conducts its work
through priority-driven annual projects
approved by the NAPPO Executive
Committee and conducted by expert
groups, including subject matter experts
from each member country and regional
industry representatives. Project results
and updates are provided during the
NAPPO annual meeting. Projects can
include the development of positions,
policies, technical documents, or the
development or revision of regional
standards for phytosanitary measures
(RSPMs). Projects can also include
implementation of standards or other
capacity development activities such as
workshops.
The 42nd NAPPO annual meeting was
held October 22 to 25, 2018, in Tucson,
AZ. The meeting featured several
strategic topics related to NAPPO’s work
program (e.g., seeds, plants for planting,
accreditation, and forestry), as well as
discussions on ePhyto, sea containers,
e-Commerce, and trade facilitation. The
meeting also featured a 1-day
symposium that helped drive critical
conversations among NAPPO countries
about the importance of using risk-based
approaches and developing precision
safeguarding strategies using cuttingedge science and technology to
maximize risk management. The
NAPPO Executive Committee meetings
took place on October 22 and 26, 2018,
February 20, 2019, and July 24, 2019.
The Deputy Administrator for PPQ is
the U.S. member of the NAPPO
Executive Committee.
The NAPPO expert groups, including
member countries’ subject matter
experts, finalized the following regional
standards, documents, products, and
projects in 2018–2019:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Nov 22, 2019
Jkt 250001
• Completed a Spanish language
online training module on RSPM 12:
Preparation of a Petition for First
Release of a Non-indigenous
Entomophagous Biological Control
Agent. The English language module
was completed the previous year.
• Organized and delivered a Western
Hemisphere Workshop to promote the
effective and harmonized
implementation of ISPM 38:
International movement of seeds in
March 2019 in San Jose, Costa Rica.
Participants in the workshop included
more than 50 participants from the
Americas represented by 13 NPPOs, 4
regional plant protection organizations,
international and regional as well as
national seed associations, companies
related to seed production, and
academia. The Inter-American Institute
for Cooperation in Agriculture (IICA)
also contributed to this event.
• Completed NAPPO RSPM 41: Use
of Systems Approaches to Manage Pest
Risks Associated with the Movement of
Forest Products. The NAPPO Executive
Committee approved this document
during the 2018 October NAPPO annual
meeting.
• Completed NAPPO Discussion
Document 10: North American approach
to preventing the introduction,
establishment and spread of khapra
beetle in the NAPPO Region. The
document was finalized in April 2018.
• Completed and published
proceedings of the first International
Symposium on Risk-Based Sampling
held in June 2017 in Baltimore, MD.
Proceedings were made available in
August 2018 (English). With the support
from IICA, NAPPO completed the
Spanish version in October 2018.
• Issued via NAPPO’s Phytosanitary
Alert System: 34 Official Pest Reports
and 5 Emerging Pest Alerts for Fiscal
Year 2019 (from October 2018 to
September 2019).
In addition, NAPPO conducted a call
for new project proposals for its 2020
Work Program during the period of
April 1, 2019 to May 30, 2019. U.S.
stakeholders were invited to submit
topics through APHIS.
New NAPPO Standard-Setting
Initiatives, Including Those in
Development
The 2019 work program 5 includes the
following topics being worked on by
NAPPO expert groups and NAPPO’s
Advisory and Management Committee.
APHIS is actively and fully participating
in the 2019 NAPPO work program. The
5 NAPPO work program: https://nappo.org/files/
5015/5386/7708/EC-4-2019_NAPPO_Work_
Program-with_IYPH-e.pdf.
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
APHIS position on each topic is guided
and informed by the best technical and
scientific information available, as well
as on relevant input from stakeholders.
For each of the following, where
applicable, the United States will
consider its position on any draft
standard after it reviews a prepared
draft. Information regarding the
following NAPPO projects, assignments,
activities, and updates on meeting times
and locations may be obtained from the
NAPPO website or by contacting Ms.
Patricia Abad (see FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT above).
1. Revision of RSPM 22: Guidelines
for construction and operation of a
containment facility for insects and
mites used as biological control agents.
2. Forest Products: Develop a NAPPO
Science and Technology document to
provide scientific background on live
contaminating organisms on
phytosanitary-certified wood products
and IPPC-marked wood packaging and
provide guidance regarding actions
appropriate for addressing associated
phytosanitary risks.
3. Revision of RSPM 17: Guidelines
for the Establishment, Maintenance, and
Verification of Fruit Fly Free Areas in
North America.
4. Support the International Year of
Plant Health (IYPH): Exchange ideas,
develop appropriate materials, and
support IYPH events in the NAPPO
region.
5. Revision of RSPM 9: Authorization
of Laboratories for Phytosanitary
Testing.
6. Revision of RSPM 35: Guidelines
for the Movement of Stone and Pome
Fruit Trees and Grapevines into a
NAPPO Member Country.
7. Implementation of ISPM 38—
International movement of seeds:
Complete and publish proceedings from
2019 Hemispheric Workshop on ISPM
38 (organized by NAPPO).
8. Lymantriids: Complete a NAPPO
Science and Technology document on
the risks associated with Lymantriids of
concern to the NAPPO region,
identifying potential species and
pathways of concern.
9. Risk-Based Sampling: Complete
and publish a Risk-Based Sampling
Manual.
10. Asian Gypsy Moth: Validate
specific risk periods for regulated Asian
gypsy moth in countries of origin.
11. Foundation and Procedure
documents: Continue to update and
finalize various NAPPO foundation or
procedure documents.
12. Phytosanitary Alert System:
Continue to manage the NAPPO pest
reporting system.
E:\FR\FM\25NON1.SGM
25NON1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 227 / Monday, November 25, 2019 / Notices
13. Update Pest List for RSPM 3:
Movement of Potatoes into a NAPPO
Member Country.
14. Electronic phytosanitary
certification (ePhyto): Provide assistance
and technical support to the IPPC
ePhyto Steering Group.
15. Stakeholder Engagement: Plan,
coordinate and execute activities for the
October 2019 NAPPO Annual Meeting
in Montreal, Canada, and publish the
quarterly newsletter.
16. Regional Collaboration:
Collaboration, focused on information
exchange, with the Inter-American
Coordinating Group in Plant Protection,
via Technical Working Groups on
ePhyto, citrus greening
(Huanglongbing), fruit flies, and Tuta
absoluta.
The PPQ Assistant Deputy
Administrator, as the official U.S.
delegate to NAPPO, intends to
participate in the adoption of these
regional plant health standards and
projects, including the work described
above, once they are completed and
ready for such consideration.
The information in this notice
contains all the information available to
us on NAPPO standards or projects
under development or consideration.
For updates on meeting times and for
information on the expert groups that
may become available following
publication of this notice, visit the
NAPPO website or contact Ms. Patricia
Abad (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT above). PPQ actively works to
achieve broad participation by States,
industry, and other stakeholders in the
development and use of international
and regional plant health standards,
including through the use of APHIS
Stakeholder Registry notices and the
APHIS public website. Plant health
stakeholders are strongly encouraged to
comment on draft standards,
documents, and specifications during
consultation periods. APHIS posts links
to draft standards on the internet as they
become available and provides
information on the due dates for
comments.6 Additional information on
NAPPO standards (including the
NAPPO Work Program, standard setting
process, and adopted standards) is
available on the NAPPO website.7
Information on official U.S.
participation in NAPPO activities,
including U.S. positions on standards
being considered, may also be obtained
from Ms. Abad. Those wishing to
6 For more information on the NAPPO draft
RSPM consultation: https://www.aphis.usda.gov/
aphis/ourfocus/planthealth/international/sa_
phytostandards/ct_draft_standards.
7 NAPPO website: https://nappo.org/.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:31 Nov 22, 2019
Jkt 250001
provide comments on any of the topics
being addressed in the NAPPO work
program may do so at any time by
responding to this notice (see
ADDRESSES above) or by transmitting
comments through Ms. Abad.
Done in Washington, DC, this 18th day of
November 2019.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2019–25443 Filed 11–22–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
[Docket No. APHIS–2018–0066]
Plants for Planting Whose Importation
Is Not Authorized Pending Pest Risk
Analysis; Notice of Availability of Data
Sheets for Taxa of Plants for Planting
That are Quarantine Pests or Hosts of
Quarantine Pests
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice of availability.
AGENCY:
We are advising the public
that we have determined that 26 taxa of
plants for planting are quarantine pests,
and that all Myrtaceae taxa (when
destined to Hawaii), all subfamily
Bambusoideae taxa, and 43 other taxa of
plants for planting are hosts of 18
quarantine pests, and therefore should
be added to our lists of taxa of plants for
planting whose importation is not
authorized pending pest risk analysis.
We have prepared data sheets that detail
the scientific evidence we evaluated in
making the determination that the taxa
are quarantine pests or hosts of
quarantine pests. We are making these
data sheets available to the public for
review and comment.
DATES: We will consider all comments
that we receive on or before January 24,
2020.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2018-0066.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Send your comment to Docket No.
APHIS–2018–0066, Regulatory Analysis
and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station
3A–03.8, 4700 River Road, Unit 118,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1238.
The data sheets and any comments we
receive may be viewed at https://
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2018-0066 or
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
64825
in our reading room, which is located in
Room 1141 of the USDA South
Building, 14th Street and Independence
Avenue SW, Washington, DC. Normal
reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
holidays. To be sure someone is there to
help you, please call (202) 799–7039
before coming.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Indira Singh, Botanist, Plants for
Planting Policy, IRM, PPQ, APHIS, 4700
River Road, Unit 133, Riverdale, MD
20737–1236; (301) 851–2020.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under the regulations in ‘‘Subpart
H—Plants for Planting’’ (7 CFR 319.37–
1 through 319.37–23, referred to below
as the regulations), the Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)
of the U.S. Department of Agriculture
prohibits or restricts the importation of
plants for planting (including living
plants, plant parts, seeds, and plant
cuttings) to prevent the introduction of
quarantine pests into the United States.
Quarantine pest is defined in § 319.37–
2 as a plant pest or noxious weed that
is of potential economic importance to
the United States and not yet present in
the United States, or present but not
widely distributed and being officially
controlled.
Section 319.37–4 of the regulations
provides that certain plants for planting
are not authorized importation into the
United States pending pest risk analysis
(NAPPRA) in order to prevent the
introduction of quarantine pests into the
United States. There are two lists of taxa
whose importation is NAPPRA: A list of
taxa of plants for planting that are
quarantine pests themselves, and a list
of taxa of plants for planting that are
hosts of quarantine pests. For taxa of
plants for planting that have been
determined to be quarantine pests, the
list includes the names of the taxa. For
taxa of plants for planting that are hosts
of quarantine pests, the list includes the
names of the taxa, the foreign countries
from which the taxa’s importation is not
authorized, and the quarantine pests of
concern.
Paragraph (b) of § 319.37–4 describes
the process for adding taxa to the
NAPPRA lists. In accordance with that
process, this notice announces our
determination that 26 taxa of plants for
planting are quarantine pests, and that
all Myrtaceae taxa (when destined to
Hawaii), all subfamily Bambusoideae
taxa, and 43 other taxa of plants for
planting are hosts of 18 quarantine
pests.
This notice also makes available data
sheets that detail the scientific evidence
E:\FR\FM\25NON1.SGM
25NON1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 227 (Monday, November 25, 2019)]
[Notices]
[Pages 64821-64825]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-25443]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
[Docket No. APHIS-2019-0064]
International Sanitary and Phytosanitary Standard-Setting
Activities
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice and request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: In accordance with legislation implementing the results of the
Uruguay Round of negotiations under the General Agreement on Tariffs
and Trade, we are informing the public of the international standard-
setting activities of the World Organization for Animal Health, the
Secretariat of the International Plant Protection Convention, and the
North American Plant Protection Organization, and we are soliciting
public comment on the standard-setting activities.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2019-0064.
Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Send your comment to
Docket No. APHIS-2019-0064, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD,
APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road, Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-
1238.
Supporting documents and any comments we receive on this docket may
be viewed at https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2019-
0064 or in our reading room, which is located in Room 1141 of the USDA
South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC.
Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 799-7039 before coming.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: For general information on the topics
covered in this notice, contact Ms. Jessica Mahalingappa, Associate
Deputy Administrator for International Services, APHIS, Room 1132, USDA
South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC
20250; (202) 799-7121.
For specific information regarding standard-setting activities of
the World Organization for Animal Health, contact Dr. Michael David,
Director, International Animal Health Standards, Veterinary Services,
APHIS, 4700 River Road, Unit 33, Riverdale, MD 20737; (301) 851-3302.
For specific information regarding the standard-setting activities
of the International Plant Protection Convention, contact Dr. Marina
Zlotina, IPPC Technical Director, International Phytosanitary
Standards, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River Road, Unit 130, Riverdale, MD 20737;
(301) 851-2200.
For specific information on the North American Plant Protection
Organization, contact Ms. Patricia Abad, NAPPO Technical Director,
International Phytosanitary Standards, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River Road,
Unit 130, Riverdale, MD 20737; (301) 851-2264.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The World Trade Organization (WTO) was established as the common
international institutional framework for governing trade relations
among its members in matters related to the Uruguay Round Agreements.
The WTO is the successor organization to the General Agreement on
Tariffs and Trade. U.S. membership in the WTO was approved by Congress
when it enacted the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (Pub. L. 103-465),
which was signed into law on December 8, 1994. The WTO Agreements,
which established the WTO, entered into force with respect to the
United States on January 1, 1995. The Uruguay Round Agreements Act
amended Title IV of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979 (19 U.S.C. 2531 et
seq.). Section 491 of the Trade Agreements Act of 1979, as amended (19
U.S.C. 2578), requires the President to designate an agency to be
responsible for informing the public of the sanitary and phytosanitary
(SPS) standard-setting activities of each international standard-
setting organization. The designated agency must inform the public by
publishing an annual notice in the Federal Register that provides the
following information: (1) The SPS standards under consideration or
planned for consideration by the international standard-setting
organization; and (2) for each SPS standard specified, a description of
the consideration or planned consideration of that standard, a
statement of whether the United States is participating or plans to
participate in the consideration of that standard, the agenda for U.S.
participation, if any, and the agency responsible for representing the
United States with respect to that standard.
``International standard'' is defined in 19 U.S.C. 2578b as any
standard, guideline, or recommendation: (1) Adopted by the Codex
Alimentarius Commission (Codex) regarding food safety; (2) developed
under the auspices of the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE,
formerly known as the Office International des Epizooties) regarding
animal health and welfare and zoonoses; (3) developed under the
auspices of the Secretariat of the International Plant Protection
Convention (IPPC or the Convention) and the North American Plant
Protection Organization (NAPPO) regarding plant health; or (4)
established by or developed under any other international organization
agreed to by the member countries of the North American Free Trade
Agreement
[[Page 64822]]
(NAFTA) or the member countries of the WTO.
The President, pursuant to Proclamation No. 6780 of March 23, 1995
(60 FR 15845), designated the Secretary of Agriculture as the official
responsible for informing the public of the SPS standard-setting
activities of Codex, OIE, IPPC, and NAPPO. The United States Department
of Agriculture's (USDA's) Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS)
informs the public of Codex standard-setting activities, and USDA's
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) informs the public
of OIE, IPPC, and NAPPO standard-setting activities.
FSIS publishes an annual notice in the Federal Register to inform
the public of SPS standard-setting activities for Codex. Codex was
created in 1962 by two United Nations organizations, the Food and
Agriculture Organization and the World Health Organization. It is the
major international organization for encouraging international trade in
food and protecting the health and economic interests of consumers.
APHIS is responsible for publishing an annual notice of OIE, IPPC,
and NAPPO activities related to international standards for plant and
animal health and representing the United States with respect to these
standards. Following are descriptions of the OIE, IPPC, and NAPPO
organizations and the standard-setting agenda for each of these
organizations. We have described the agenda that each of these
organizations will address at their annual general sessions, including
standards that may be presented for adoption or consideration, as well
as other initiatives that may be underway at the OIE, IPPC, and NAPPO.
The agendas for these meetings are subject to change, and the draft
standards identified in this notice may not be sufficiently developed
and ready for adoption as indicated. Also, while it is the intent of
the United States to support adoption of international standards and to
participate actively and fully in their development, it should be
recognized that the U.S. position on a specific draft standard will
depend on the acceptability of the final draft. Given the dynamic and
interactive nature of the standard-setting process, we encourage any
persons who are interested in the most current details about a specific
draft standard or the U.S. position on a particular standard-setting
issue, or in providing comments on a specific standard that may be
under development, to contact APHIS. Contact information is provided at
the beginning of this notice under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT.
OIE Standard-Setting Activities
The OIE was established in Paris, France, in 1924 with the signing
of an international agreement by 28 countries. It is currently composed
of 182 Members, each of which is represented by a delegate who, in most
cases, is the chief veterinary officer of that country or territory.
The WTO has recognized the OIE as the international forum for setting
animal health standards, reporting global animal disease events, and
presenting guidelines and recommendations on sanitary measures relating
to animal health.
The OIE facilitates intergovernmental cooperation to prevent the
spread of contagious diseases in animals by sharing scientific research
among its Members. The major functions of the OIE are to collect and
disseminate information on the distribution and occurrence of animal
diseases and to ensure that science-based standards govern
international trade in animals and animal products. The OIE aims to
achieve these through the development and revision of international
standards for diagnostic tests, vaccines, and the safe international
trade of animals and animal products.
The OIE provides annual reports on the global distribution of
animal diseases, recognizes the free status of Members for certain
diseases, categorizes animal diseases with respect to their
international significance, publishes bulletins on global disease
status, and provides animal disease control guidelines to Members.
Various OIE commissions and working groups undertake the development
and preparation of draft standards, which are then circulated to
Members for consultation (review and comment). Draft standards are
revised accordingly and are presented to the OIE World Assembly of
Delegates (all the Members) for review and adoption during the General
Session, which meets annually every May. Adoption, as a general rule,
is based on consensus of the OIE membership.
The most recent OIE General Session occurred May 26 to 31, 2019, in
Paris, France. The Deputy Administrator (a.k.a., Chief Veterinary
Officer) for APHIS' Veterinary Services program serves as the official
U.S. Delegate to the OIE at this General Session. Information about OIE
draft Terrestrial and Aquatic Animal Health Code chapters may be found
on the internet at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/animalhealth/export/international-standard-setting-activities-oie/regionalization/ct_international_standard_setting_activities_oie or by
contacting Dr. Michael David (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
above).
OIE Terrestrial and Aquatic Animal Health Code Chapters Adopted During
the May 2019 General Session
Eleven Code chapters were amended, rewritten, or newly proposed and
presented for adoption at the General Session. The following Code
chapters are of particular interest to the United States:
1. Chapter 1.4., Animal Health Surveillance. Amendments to chapter
included changes to the use of the terms ``target population'' and
``study population.''
2. Chapter 4.Z., Introduction to recommendations for the prevention
and control of transmissible animal diseases. This is a new chapter
that has been reviewed in prior comment cycles and provides general
considerations when controlling animal diseases.
3. Articles 7.13.4. and 7.13.15., Animal welfare and pig production
systems. The United States supported the adoption of this new chapter
in 2018. Minor editorial amendments were adopted in 2019.
4. Chapter 7.Y., Killing of reptiles for their skins, meat and
other products. This is a newly adopted chapter that has been reviewed
in prior comment cycles.
5. Chapter 8.14., Infection with rabies virus. The Code Commission
highlighted the current global priority to control and eradicate dog-
mediated rabies, and adopted changes to the chapter that are aligned
with that priority. Additional provisions addressing wildlife vectors
will be considered in the next revision of the chapter.
6. Article 14.4.1., Infection with Chlamydophila abortus (Enzootic
abortion of ewes, ovine chlamydiosis). The name of the pathogenic agent
changed from Chlamydophila abortus to Chlamydia abortus.
7. Articles 15.1.1bis, 15.1.2., 15.1.3., 15.1.16., 15.1.22.,
15.1.31., Infection with African swine fever virus. Amendments were
made to strengthen the recommendations for testing wild or feral pigs
found dead, road kills, animals showing abnormal behavior, and hunted
animals sampled in surveillance programs.
OIE Terrestrial Animal Health Code Chapters for Upcoming and Future
Review
Chapter 1.1., Notification of diseases, infections and
infestations, and provision of epidemiological information.
[[Page 64823]]
Chapter 1.6., Procedures for self-declaration and for
official recognition by the OIE.
Chapter 3.4., Veterinary legislation.
Chapter 4.Y., Draft new chapter on official control
programs for listed and emerging diseases.
Chapter 7.Z., Draft new chapter on animal welfare and
laying hen production systems.
Chapter 10.4., Infection with avian influenza viruses.
Chapter 15.2., Infection with classical swine fever virus.
Chapter 8.11., Infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis
complex.
Chapter 8.15., Infection with Rift Valley fever virus.
Article 12.6.6., Infection with equine influenza.
Articles 14.7.3. and 14.7.34., Infection with peste des
petits ruminants virus.
IPPC Standard-Setting Activities
The IPPC is a multilateral convention adopted in 1952 to prevent
the spread and introduction of pests of plants and plant products and
to promote appropriate measures for their control. The WTO recognizes
the IPPC as the standard setting body for plant health. Under the IPPC,
the understanding of plant protection encompasses the protection of
both cultivated and non-cultivated plants from direct or indirect
injury by plant pests. The IPPC addresses the following activities:
Developing, adopting, and implementing international standards for
phytosanitary (plant health) measures (ISPMs); harmonizing
phytosanitary activities through adopted standards; facilitating the
exchange of official and scientific information among contracting
parties; and providing technical assistance to developing countries
that are contracting parties to the Convention.
The IPPC is deposited within the Food and Agriculture Organization
of the United Nations and is an international agreement of 183
contracting parties. National plant protection organizations (NPPOs),
in cooperation with regional plant protection organizations, the
Commission on Phytosanitary Measures (CPM), and the Secretariat of the
IPPC, implement the Convention. The IPPC continues to be administered
at the national level by plant quarantine officials, whose primary
objective is to safeguard plant resources from injurious pests. In the
United States, the NPPO is APHIS' Plant Protection and Quarantine (PPQ)
program.
The 14th Session of the CPM took place from April 1 to 5, 2019, in
Rome, Italy, at the Headquarters of the Food and Agriculture
Organization of the United Nations. The Deputy Administrator for APHIS'
PPQ program was the U.S. delegate to the CPM.
The CPM adopted the following standards at its 2019 meeting. The
United States, represented by the Deputy Administrator for APHIS' PPQ
program, participated in deliberations of these standards. The United
States developed its position on each of these issues prior to the CPM
session, which were based on APHIS' analyses and other relevant
information from other U.S. Government agencies and interested
stakeholders:
ISPM 5: Glossary of phytosanitary terms (2019 revisions).
ISPM 43: Requirements for the use of fumigation as a
phytosanitary measure.
Diagnostic protocols (DPs) as Annexes to ISPM 27:
Diagnostic protocols for regulated pests:
[cir] DP 2: Plum pox virus (2018 revisions).
[cir] DP 25: Xylella fastidiosa.
[cir] DP 26: Austropuccinia psidii.
[cir] DP 27: Ips spp.
[cir] DP 28: Conotrachelus nenuphar.
[cir] DP 29: Bactrocera dorsalis.
The CPM also adopted Recommendation R08, ``Preparing to use high-
throughput sequencing (HTS) technologies as a diagnostic tool for
phytosanitary purposes.''
The CPM added to the IPPC work program new topics for 13 standards
and 12 tools to implement standards, which were submitted by the
contracting parties during 2018 call for topics.
In addition to adopting these plant health standards, the 2019
Commission meeting also progressed a number of plant health initiatives
strategically important to the United States. These initiatives include
endorsing the new IPPC strategic framework for 2020-2030 to set the top
priorities for plant health and trade into the next decade, approving
an electronic certification system (ePhyto) implementation plan to
support trade and identifying next steps for its longer term worldwide
application, developing programs aimed at improving the use and
implementation of standards around the world, and planning events and
activities for the International Year of Plant Health in 2020 to
mobilize worldwide awareness and support for plant health going into
the next decade.
New IPPC Standard-Setting Initiatives, Including Those Under
Development
A number of expert working group (EWG) meetings or other technical
consultations took place October 2018 through September 2019 on the
topics listed below. These standard-setting initiatives are under
development and may be considered for future adoption. APHIS intends to
participate actively and fully in each of these working groups. APHIS
developed its position on each of the topics prior to the working group
meetings. The APHIS position was based on technical analyses,
information from other U.S. Government agencies, and relevant
scientific information from interested stakeholders:
EWG on Audit in the Phytosanitary Context.
Technical Panel on Diagnostic Protocols.
Technical Panel on Phytosanitary Treatments.
Technical Panel for the Glossary.
Focus Group on Commodity Standards.
Sea Container Task Force.
For more detailed information on the above, contact Dr. Marina
Zlotina (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT above).
PPQ actively works to achieve broad participation by States,
industry, and other stakeholders in the development and use of
international and regional plant health standards, including through
the use of APHIS Stakeholder Registry notices \1\ and the APHIS public
website. Plant health stakeholders are strongly encouraged to comment
on draft standards, documents, and specifications during the
consultation periods. In 2019, 13 draft standards were open for
consultation. APHIS posts links to draft standards on its website as
they become available and provides information on the due dates for
comments.\2\ Additional information on IPPC standards (including the
IPPC work program (list of topics \3\), calls for new standards,
experts to serve on technical panels and other working groups, proposed
phytosanitary treatments, standard-setting process, and adopted
standards) is available on the IPPC website.\4\ For the most current
information on official U.S. participation in IPPC activities,
including U.S. positions on standards being considered, contact Dr.
Marina
[[Page 64824]]
Zlotina (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT above). Those wishing to
provide comments on any of the areas of work being undertaken by the
IPPC may do so at any time by responding to this notice (see ADDRESSES
above) or by providing comments through Dr. Zlotina.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ To sign up for the Stakeholder Registry, go to: https://public.govdelivery.com/accounts/USDAAPHIS/subscriber/new.
\2\ For more information on the IPPC draft ISPM consultation:
https://www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/planthealth/international/sa_phytostandards/ct_draft_standards.
\3\ IPPC list of topics: https://www.ippc.int/en/core-activities/standards-setting/list-topics-ippc-standards/.
\4\ IPPC website: https://www.ippc.int/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
NAPPO Standard-Setting Activities
NAPPO, a regional plant protection organization created in 1976
under the IPPC, coordinates the efforts among the United States,
Canada, and Mexico to protect their plant resources from the entry,
establishment, and spread of harmful plant pests, while facilitating
intra- and inter-regional trade. As the NPPO of the United States,
APHIS' PPQ is the organization officially identified to participate in
NAPPO. Through NAPPO, APHIS works closely with its regional
counterparts and industries to develop harmonized regional standards
and approaches for managing pest threats. NAPPO conducts its work
through priority-driven annual projects approved by the NAPPO Executive
Committee and conducted by expert groups, including subject matter
experts from each member country and regional industry representatives.
Project results and updates are provided during the NAPPO annual
meeting. Projects can include the development of positions, policies,
technical documents, or the development or revision of regional
standards for phytosanitary measures (RSPMs). Projects can also include
implementation of standards or other capacity development activities
such as workshops.
The 42nd NAPPO annual meeting was held October 22 to 25, 2018, in
Tucson, AZ. The meeting featured several strategic topics related to
NAPPO's work program (e.g., seeds, plants for planting, accreditation,
and forestry), as well as discussions on ePhyto, sea containers, e-
Commerce, and trade facilitation. The meeting also featured a 1-day
symposium that helped drive critical conversations among NAPPO
countries about the importance of using risk-based approaches and
developing precision safeguarding strategies using cutting-edge science
and technology to maximize risk management. The NAPPO Executive
Committee meetings took place on October 22 and 26, 2018, February 20,
2019, and July 24, 2019. The Deputy Administrator for PPQ is the U.S.
member of the NAPPO Executive Committee.
The NAPPO expert groups, including member countries' subject matter
experts, finalized the following regional standards, documents,
products, and projects in 2018-2019:
Completed a Spanish language online training module on
RSPM 12: Preparation of a Petition for First Release of a Non-
indigenous Entomophagous Biological Control Agent. The English language
module was completed the previous year.
Organized and delivered a Western Hemisphere Workshop to
promote the effective and harmonized implementation of ISPM 38:
International movement of seeds in March 2019 in San Jose, Costa Rica.
Participants in the workshop included more than 50 participants from
the Americas represented by 13 NPPOs, 4 regional plant protection
organizations, international and regional as well as national seed
associations, companies related to seed production, and academia. The
Inter-American Institute for Cooperation in Agriculture (IICA) also
contributed to this event.
Completed NAPPO RSPM 41: Use of Systems Approaches to
Manage Pest Risks Associated with the Movement of Forest Products. The
NAPPO Executive Committee approved this document during the 2018
October NAPPO annual meeting.
Completed NAPPO Discussion Document 10: North American
approach to preventing the introduction, establishment and spread of
khapra beetle in the NAPPO Region. The document was finalized in April
2018.
Completed and published proceedings of the first
International Symposium on Risk-Based Sampling held in June 2017 in
Baltimore, MD. Proceedings were made available in August 2018
(English). With the support from IICA, NAPPO completed the Spanish
version in October 2018.
Issued via NAPPO's Phytosanitary Alert System: 34 Official
Pest Reports and 5 Emerging Pest Alerts for Fiscal Year 2019 (from
October 2018 to September 2019).
In addition, NAPPO conducted a call for new project proposals for
its 2020 Work Program during the period of April 1, 2019 to May 30,
2019. U.S. stakeholders were invited to submit topics through APHIS.
New NAPPO Standard-Setting Initiatives, Including Those in Development
The 2019 work program \5\ includes the following topics being
worked on by NAPPO expert groups and NAPPO's Advisory and Management
Committee. APHIS is actively and fully participating in the 2019 NAPPO
work program. The APHIS position on each topic is guided and informed
by the best technical and scientific information available, as well as
on relevant input from stakeholders. For each of the following, where
applicable, the United States will consider its position on any draft
standard after it reviews a prepared draft. Information regarding the
following NAPPO projects, assignments, activities, and updates on
meeting times and locations may be obtained from the NAPPO website or
by contacting Ms. Patricia Abad (see FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
above).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ NAPPO work program: https://nappo.org/files/5015/5386/7708/EC-4-2019_NAPPO_Work_Program-with_IYPH-e.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Revision of RSPM 22: Guidelines for construction and operation
of a containment facility for insects and mites used as biological
control agents.
2. Forest Products: Develop a NAPPO Science and Technology document
to provide scientific background on live contaminating organisms on
phytosanitary-certified wood products and IPPC-marked wood packaging
and provide guidance regarding actions appropriate for addressing
associated phytosanitary risks.
3. Revision of RSPM 17: Guidelines for the Establishment,
Maintenance, and Verification of Fruit Fly Free Areas in North America.
4. Support the International Year of Plant Health (IYPH): Exchange
ideas, develop appropriate materials, and support IYPH events in the
NAPPO region.
5. Revision of RSPM 9: Authorization of Laboratories for
Phytosanitary Testing.
6. Revision of RSPM 35: Guidelines for the Movement of Stone and
Pome Fruit Trees and Grapevines into a NAPPO Member Country.
7. Implementation of ISPM 38--International movement of seeds:
Complete and publish proceedings from 2019 Hemispheric Workshop on ISPM
38 (organized by NAPPO).
8. Lymantriids: Complete a NAPPO Science and Technology document on
the risks associated with Lymantriids of concern to the NAPPO region,
identifying potential species and pathways of concern.
9. Risk-Based Sampling: Complete and publish a Risk-Based Sampling
Manual.
10. Asian Gypsy Moth: Validate specific risk periods for regulated
Asian gypsy moth in countries of origin.
11. Foundation and Procedure documents: Continue to update and
finalize various NAPPO foundation or procedure documents.
12. Phytosanitary Alert System: Continue to manage the NAPPO pest
reporting system.
[[Page 64825]]
13. Update Pest List for RSPM 3: Movement of Potatoes into a NAPPO
Member Country.
14. Electronic phytosanitary certification (ePhyto): Provide
assistance and technical support to the IPPC ePhyto Steering Group.
15. Stakeholder Engagement: Plan, coordinate and execute activities
for the October 2019 NAPPO Annual Meeting in Montreal, Canada, and
publish the quarterly newsletter.
16. Regional Collaboration: Collaboration, focused on information
exchange, with the Inter-American Coordinating Group in Plant
Protection, via Technical Working Groups on ePhyto, citrus greening
(Huanglongbing), fruit flies, and Tuta absoluta.
The PPQ Assistant Deputy Administrator, as the official U.S.
delegate to NAPPO, intends to participate in the adoption of these
regional plant health standards and projects, including the work
described above, once they are completed and ready for such
consideration.
The information in this notice contains all the information
available to us on NAPPO standards or projects under development or
consideration. For updates on meeting times and for information on the
expert groups that may become available following publication of this
notice, visit the NAPPO website or contact Ms. Patricia Abad (see FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT above). PPQ actively works to achieve broad
participation by States, industry, and other stakeholders in the
development and use of international and regional plant health
standards, including through the use of APHIS Stakeholder Registry
notices and the APHIS public website. Plant health stakeholders are
strongly encouraged to comment on draft standards, documents, and
specifications during consultation periods. APHIS posts links to draft
standards on the internet as they become available and provides
information on the due dates for comments.\6\ Additional information on
NAPPO standards (including the NAPPO Work Program, standard setting
process, and adopted standards) is available on the NAPPO website.\7\
Information on official U.S. participation in NAPPO activities,
including U.S. positions on standards being considered, may also be
obtained from Ms. Abad. Those wishing to provide comments on any of the
topics being addressed in the NAPPO work program may do so at any time
by responding to this notice (see ADDRESSES above) or by transmitting
comments through Ms. Abad.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ For more information on the NAPPO draft RSPM consultation:
https://www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/planthealth/international/sa_phytostandards/ct_draft_standards.
\7\ NAPPO website: https://nappo.org/.
Done in Washington, DC, this 18th day of November 2019.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-25443 Filed 11-22-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P