Amendments to the Pale Cyst Nematode Regulations, 7304-7306 [2019-03673]
Download as PDF
7304
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 84, No. 42
Monday, March 4, 2019
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
Ms.
Evelia Sosa, Assistant Director, Pest
Management, PHP, PPQ, APHIS, 4700
River Road, Unit 137, Riverdale, MD
20737; (301) 851–2217; Evelia.Sosa@
aphis.usda.gov.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
7 CFR Part 301
[Docket No. APHIS–2018–0041]
RIN 0579–AE48
Amendments to the Pale Cyst
Nematode Regulations
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
We are proposing to amend
the domestic quarantine regulations for
pale cyst nematode by adding
procedures that would allow persons to
review and comment on the protocols
for regulating and deregulating
quarantine and associated areas. As part
of this proposal, we are making the
protocols publicly available. We are
proposing these actions in response to a
court order requiring the Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service to
facilitate public input into the
development of protocols for
deregulating fields for pale cyst
nematode. The changes we propose
would make the protocols more
accessible and give persons the
opportunity to comment on their
development.
SUMMARY:
We will consider all comments
that we receive on or before May 3,
2019.
DATES:
You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2018-0041.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Send your comment to Docket No.
APHIS–2018–0041, Regulatory Analysis
and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station
3A–03.8, 4700 River Road, Unit 118,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1238.
Supporting documents and any
comments we receive on this docket
may be viewed at https://
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Mar 01, 2019
Jkt 247001
www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;
D=APHIS-2018-0041 or in our reading
room, which is located in Room 1141 of
the USDA South Building, 14th Street
and Independence Avenue SW,
Washington, DC. Normal reading room
hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday
through Friday, except holidays. To be
sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 799–7039 before
coming.
The pale cyst nematode (PCN,
Globodera pallida) is a major pest of
potato crops in cool-temperature areas.
Other hosts of this pest include
tomatoes, eggplants, peppers, tomatillos,
and some weeds. The PCN is thought to
have originated in Peru and is now
widely distributed in many potatogrowing regions of the world. Females
commonly form cysts containing 200 to
600 eggs, which can remain dormant
and viable in soil for up to 30 years.
Affected potato plants may exhibit
yellowing, wilting, or death of foliage.
Unmanaged infestations can cause
potato yield losses ranging from 20 to 70
percent. The spread of PCN in the
United States could result in a
significant loss of domestic and foreign
markets for U.S. potatoes and other host
commodities.
Section 414 of the Plant Protection
Act (PPA, 7 U.S.C. 7714) provides that
the Secretary of Agriculture may, under
certain conditions, hold, seize,
quarantine, treat, apply other remedial
measures to destroy or otherwise
dispose of any plant, plant pest, plant
product, article, or means of conveyance
that is moving, or has moved into or
through the United States or interstate if
the Secretary has reason to believe the
article is a plant pest or is infested with
a plant pest at the time of movement.
The PCN regulations in 7 CFR part
301 (Subpart—Pale Cyst Nematode,
§§ 301.86 through 301.86–9, referred to
below as the regulations) set out
quarantine and movement restrictions
for regulated articles from fields infested
with PCN and associated fields.
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Section 301.86–3 sets out procedures
for determining the areas quarantined
for PCN. Paragraph (a) of § 301.86–3
states that, in accordance with the
criteria listed in § 301.86–3(c), the
Administrator of the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service (APHIS) will
designate as a quarantined area each
field that has been found to be infested
with PCN, each field that has been
found to be associated with an infested
field, and any area that the
Administrator considers necessary to
quarantine because of its inseparability
for quarantine enforcement purposes
from infested or associated fields.
Under § 301.86–3(c), APHIS
designates a field as being infested if
PCN is found in that field. A field is
designated as an associated field,
meaning that the field is at risk for PCN,
if it meets certain criteria. These include
any field in which PCN host crops were
grown in the last 10 years, and (1) The
field shares a border with an infested
field; or (2) the field came into contact
with a regulated article listed in
§ 301.86–2 from an infested field within
the last 10 years; or (3) within the last
10 years, the field shared ownership,
tenancy, seed, drainage or runoff, farm
machinery, or other shared cultural
practices with an infested field that
could allow spread of PCN.
Paragraph (d) of § 301.86–3 states that
an infested field will be removed from
quarantine when a protocol approved by
the Administrator as sufficient to
support removal of infested fields from
quarantine has been completed and the
field has been found to be free from PCN
based on the protocol. The removal from
quarantine of any associated fields also
requires steps under an approved
protocol.
The PCN regulations were first
established in an interim rule published
September 12, 2007 (72 FR 51975–
51988, Docket No. APHIS–2006–0143),
after parts of Bingham and Bonneville
Counties, ID, were quarantined upon
discovery of PCN in several potato fields
in 2006. The interim rule restricted the
interstate movement of potatoes and
other regulated articles from the
quarantined area to prevent the spread
of PCN to non-infested areas of the
United States. We included in § 301.86–
3 of the interim rule the provision that
an infested field will be removed from
quarantine when a 3-year biosurvey
protocol approved by APHIS has been
E:\FR\FM\04MRP1.SGM
04MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 42 / Monday, March 4, 2019 / Proposed Rules
completed and the field has been found
to be free of PCN. The 3-year biosurvey
protocol involves planting PCN host
crops in soil from a field and sampling
the soil for PCN. This process must be
repeated over three crop cycles with
negative results in order for APHIS to
deregulate a field for PCN.
On April 29, 2009 (74 FR 19374–
19382, Docket No. APHIS–2006–0143),
we published a final rule based on our
evaluation of public comments that we
received on the interim rule and input
from an independent science panel.
Based on our review of this information,
we determined that including the 3-year
biosurvey protocol in the regulations as
the only approach for deregulating
fields precluded the potential use of
other methods that would be sufficient
for evaluating fields for PCN, so we
broadened the approach in § 301.86–
3(d)(1) to read ‘‘a protocol approved by
the Administrator as sufficient to
support removal of infested fields from
quarantine.’’ We stated in the final rule
that we would continue to solicit
stakeholder input as we develop the
field removal protocol and update
affected producers and other interested
parties on our progress.
On April 28, 2015, a group of Idaho
potato farmers subject to the PCN
quarantine filed a complaint against
APHIS in the U.S. District Court in
Idaho. Among the allegations in the
complaint was that APHIS violated
provisions of the PPA and the
Administrative Procedure Act (APA) by
not developing accessible regulations
and failing to follow notice and
comment requirements of the APA. The
plaintiffs alleged that the final rule
contemplated further rulemaking
through the creation of protocols to be
used to support removal of infested and
associated fields from regulation.
Because APHIS had not publically
issued the protocol referenced in the
final rule, the plaintiffs stated they were
unclear as to what methods and data
APHIS drew on in deciding whether to
deregulate infested and associated
fields, making the requirements
imposed on the plaintiffs vague and
impossible to satisfy. The complaint
asked the court to set aside the final rule
and end the quarantine and regulation
of all fields owned and farmed by the
plaintiffs.
In a decision filed March 20, 2018,1
the court declined to set aside the final
rule, citing the economic value of the
potato industry and noting that ending
regulation for PCN would have adverse
1 https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTSidd-1_15-cv-00143/pdf/USCOURTS-idd-1_15-cv00143-2.pdf.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Mar 01, 2019
Jkt 247001
consequences on the State of Idaho and
the United States. However, the court
ruled that APHIS did not satisfy the
requirements of the APA because the
deregulation protocols ‘‘change existing
law by adding new substantive
requirements for the quarantining and
deregulating of PCN infested and
associated fields to be implemented by
APHIS pursuant to its authority under
the PPA.’’ Accordingly, the protocols
were determined to be legislative rules
for which APHIS is required to provide
a notice of availability of the protocols
in the Federal Register, provide a
period for interested individuals to
comment on the protocols, and publish
the adopted protocols not less than 30
days before the effective date. The court
ordered APHIS to immediately begin the
process of providing for public notice
and comment on the protocols and to
satisfy the APA notice and comment
requirements for all current and future
actions relating to regulation of PCN.
We are responding to the court order
in this rulemaking by proposing to
include procedures in the regulations
for public notice and comment of the
PCN deregulation protocols. Although
not ordered to do so by the court, we are
proposing to do the same for the criteria
APHIS uses to make initial designations
of fields. We are proposing to amend
§ 301.86–3, paragraphs (c) and (d), to
provide that any substantive changes to
the protocols will first be announced in
a Federal Register notice that informs
the public of the proposed change and
solicits comment. After we review and
consider public comments on the
changes, we would publish another
notice in the Federal Register informing
the public of any changes we made to
the protocols.
The protocols are available for
comment on the Regulations.gov
website and in our reading room (see
ADDRESSES above for instructions for
accessing Regulations.gov and
information on the location and hours of
the reading room). We would make
future versions of protocols available on
the APHIS website or upon request from
any local office of APHIS-Plant
Protection and Quarantine; local offices
are listed in telephone directories.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13771 and
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for the
purposes of Executive Order 12866 and,
therefore, has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget. This
proposed rule is not expected to be an
Executive Order 13771 regulatory action
because this proposed rule is not
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
7305
significant under Executive Order
12866.
In accordance with the Regulatory
Flexibility Act, we have analyzed the
potential economic effects of this action
on small entities. The analysis is
summarized below. Copies of the full
analysis are available by contacting the
person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT or on the
Regulations.gov website (see ADDRESSES
above for instructions for accessing
Regulations.gov).
According to the Small Business
Administration, entities whose main
activity is potato farming (classified
under NAICS 111211) are considered
small if they have $750,000 or less in
annual receipts. Based on the 2012
Census of Agriculture, there were about
24,000 farms in Idaho, of which around
800 were considered to be primarily
potato farms. Bingham and Bonneville
Counties had 122 and 36 potato farms,
respectively. There were about 2,000
farms in Idaho with farm sales greater
than $500,000, of which around 1,200
farms had farm sales greater than $1
million. According to the 2012 Census,
142 of Bingham County’s 1,265 farm
operations (about 11 percent) had farm
sales greater than $500,000, while in
Bonneville County, 56 of the 893 farm
operations (about 6 percent) had farm
sales greater than $500,000. Although
the distribution of potato farms with
farm sales above $500,000 (or $750,000)
is not known, it is reasonable to
conclude that many of the potato farms
in Bingham and Bonneville counties are
under the threshold and would be
considered as small business entities.
However, the proposed rule would
not impose new or additional burdens
on small entities as this is an
administrative action for which there
would be no additional costs.
Under these circumstances, the
Administrator of the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service has
determined that this action would not
have a significant economic impact on
a substantial number of small entities.
Executive Order 12372
This program/activity is listed in the
Catalog of Federal Domestic Assistance
under No. 10.025 and is subject to
Executive Order 12372, which requires
intergovernmental consultation with
State and local officials. (See 2 CFR
chapter IV.)
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12988, Civil
Justice Reform. If this proposed rule is
adopted: (1) All State and local laws and
regulations that are inconsistent with
E:\FR\FM\04MRP1.SGM
04MRP1
7306
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 42 / Monday, March 4, 2019 / Proposed Rules
this rule will be preempted; (2) no
retroactive effect will be given to this
rule; and (3) administrative proceedings
will not be required before parties may
file suit in court challenging this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no
reporting, recordkeeping, or third party
disclosure requirements under the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44
U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 301
Agricultural commodities, Plant
diseases and pests, Quarantine,
Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Transportation.
Accordingly, we propose to amend 7
CFR part 301 as follows:
Subpart S—Pale Cyst Nematode
1. The authority citation for part 301
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701–7772 and 7781–
7786; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
Section 301.75–15 issued under Sec. 204,
Title II, Public Law 106–113, 113 Stat.
1501A–293; sections 301.75–15 and 301.75–
16 issued under Sec. 203, Title II, Public Law
106–224, 114 Stat. 400 (7 U.S.C. 1421 note).
2. Section 301.86–3 is amended as
follows:
■ a. In paragraph (a), by removing the
words ‘‘https://www.aphis.usda.gov/
plant_health/plant_pest_info/potato/
pcn.shtml’’ and adding the words
‘‘https://www.aphis.usda.gov/
planthealth/pcn’’ in their place; and
■ b. By revising paragraphs (c)(1) and
(d).
The revisions read as follows:
■
§ 301.86–3
Quarantined areas.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(1) Infested fields. A field will be
designated as an infested field for pale
cyst nematode upon a determination
that viable pale cyst nematode is present
in the field. The determination will be
made in accordance with the criteria
established by the Administrator for the
designation of infested fields. The
criteria are presented in a protocol
document that may be viewed at https://
www.aphis.usda.gov/planthealth/pcn.
The protocol may also be obtained by
request from any local office of Plant
Protection and Quarantine; local offices
are listed in telephone directories. Any
substantive changes we propose to make
to the protocol will be published for
comment in the Federal Register. After
we review the comments received, we
will publish another notice in the
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:47 Mar 01, 2019
Jkt 247001
Federal Register informing the public of
any changes to the protocol.
*
*
*
*
*
(d) Removal of fields from
quarantine—(1) Infested fields. An
infested field will be removed from
quarantine for pale cyst nematode upon
a determination that no viable pale cyst
nematode is detected in the field. The
determination will be made in
accordance with criteria established by
the Administrator and sufficient to
support removal of infested fields from
quarantine. The criteria are presented in
a protocol document as provided in
(d)(4) of this section along with
information for viewing the protocol.
(2) Associated fields. An associated
field will be removed from quarantine
for pale cyst nematode once surveys are
completed and pale cyst nematode is
not detected in the field. The
determination will be made in
accordance with criteria established by
the Administrator and sufficient to
support removal of associated fields
from quarantine. The criteria are
presented in a protocol document as
provided in (d)(4) of this section along
with information for viewing the
protocol.
(3) Removal of other areas from
quarantine. If the Administrator has
quarantined any area other than infested
or associated fields because of its
inseparability for quarantine
enforcement purposes from infested or
associated fields, as provided in
paragraph (a) of this section, that area
will be removed from quarantine when
the relevant infested or associated fields
are removed from quarantine.
(4) Protocol for removal of fields from
quarantine. The Administrator will
remove infested and associated fields,
and other areas as provided in this
section, from quarantine for pale cyst
nematode in accordance with the
protocols published on the Plant
Protection and Quarantine website at
https://www.aphis.usda.gov/
planthealth/pcn. The protocols may also
be obtained by request from any local
office of Plant Protection and
Quarantine; local offices are listed in
telephone directories. Any substantive
changes we propose to make to the
protocols will be published for
comment in the Federal Register. After
we review the comments received, we
will publish another notice in the
Federal Register informing the public of
any changes to the protocols.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
Done in Washington, DC, this 25th day of
February 2019.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2019–03673 Filed 3–1–19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 71
[Docket No. FAA–2019–0033; Airspace
Docket No. 19–AGL–3]
RIN 2120–AA66
Proposed Amendment of Class E
Airspace; Dickinson, ND
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
This action proposes to
amend Class E surface airspace and
Class E airspace areas extending upward
from 700 feet or more above the surface
of the earth at Dickinson-Theodore
Roosevelt Regional Airport (formerly
Dickinson Municipal Airport) in
Dickinson, ND. The FAA is proposing
this action as the result of an airspace
review caused by the decommissioning
of the Dickinson non-directional radio
beacon (NDB). The geographic
coordinates for the airport in the
associated airspace and the airport name
would be updated to coincide with the
FAA’s aeronautical database. Also, the
Dickinson VHF omni-directional radio
range and tactical air navigational aid
(VORTAC) is no longer needed in the
description of the E–5 airspace and will
be removed. Airspace redesign is
necessary for the safety and
management of instrument flight rules
(IFR) operations at these airports.
DATES: Comments must be received on
or before April 18, 2019.
ADDRESSES: Send comments on this
proposal to the U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations,
West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590, telephone (202)
366–9826, or (800) 647–5527. You must
identify FAA Docket No. FAA–2019–
0033; Airspace Docket No. 19–AGL–3,
at the beginning of your comments. You
may also submit comments through the
internet at https://www.regulations.gov.
You may review the public docket
containing the proposal, any comments
received, and any final disposition in
person in the Dockets Office between
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\04MRP1.SGM
04MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 84, Number 42 (Monday, March 4, 2019)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 7304-7306]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2019-03673]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 84, No. 42 / Monday, March 4, 2019 / Proposed
Rules
[[Page 7304]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
7 CFR Part 301
[Docket No. APHIS-2018-0041]
RIN 0579-AE48
Amendments to the Pale Cyst Nematode Regulations
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are proposing to amend the domestic quarantine regulations
for pale cyst nematode by adding procedures that would allow persons to
review and comment on the protocols for regulating and deregulating
quarantine and associated areas. As part of this proposal, we are
making the protocols publicly available. We are proposing these actions
in response to a court order requiring the Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service to facilitate public input into the development of
protocols for deregulating fields for pale cyst nematode. The changes
we propose would make the protocols more accessible and give persons
the opportunity to comment on their development.
DATES: We will consider all comments that we receive on or before May
3, 2019.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2018-0041.
Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Send your comment to
Docket No. APHIS-2018-0041, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD,
APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road, Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-
1238.
Supporting documents and any comments we receive on this docket may
be viewed at https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2018-
0041 or in our reading room, which is located in Room 1141 of the USDA
South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC.
Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 799-7039 before coming.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Evelia Sosa, Assistant Director,
Pest Management, PHP, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River Road, Unit 137, Riverdale,
MD 20737; (301) 851-2217; Evelia.Sosa@aphis.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
The pale cyst nematode (PCN, Globodera pallida) is a major pest of
potato crops in cool-temperature areas. Other hosts of this pest
include tomatoes, eggplants, peppers, tomatillos, and some weeds. The
PCN is thought to have originated in Peru and is now widely distributed
in many potato-growing regions of the world. Females commonly form
cysts containing 200 to 600 eggs, which can remain dormant and viable
in soil for up to 30 years. Affected potato plants may exhibit
yellowing, wilting, or death of foliage. Unmanaged infestations can
cause potato yield losses ranging from 20 to 70 percent. The spread of
PCN in the United States could result in a significant loss of domestic
and foreign markets for U.S. potatoes and other host commodities.
Section 414 of the Plant Protection Act (PPA, 7 U.S.C. 7714)
provides that the Secretary of Agriculture may, under certain
conditions, hold, seize, quarantine, treat, apply other remedial
measures to destroy or otherwise dispose of any plant, plant pest,
plant product, article, or means of conveyance that is moving, or has
moved into or through the United States or interstate if the Secretary
has reason to believe the article is a plant pest or is infested with a
plant pest at the time of movement.
The PCN regulations in 7 CFR part 301 (Subpart--Pale Cyst Nematode,
Sec. Sec. 301.86 through 301.86-9, referred to below as the
regulations) set out quarantine and movement restrictions for regulated
articles from fields infested with PCN and associated fields.
Section 301.86-3 sets out procedures for determining the areas
quarantined for PCN. Paragraph (a) of Sec. 301.86-3 states that, in
accordance with the criteria listed in Sec. 301.86-3(c), the
Administrator of the Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)
will designate as a quarantined area each field that has been found to
be infested with PCN, each field that has been found to be associated
with an infested field, and any area that the Administrator considers
necessary to quarantine because of its inseparability for quarantine
enforcement purposes from infested or associated fields.
Under Sec. 301.86-3(c), APHIS designates a field as being infested
if PCN is found in that field. A field is designated as an associated
field, meaning that the field is at risk for PCN, if it meets certain
criteria. These include any field in which PCN host crops were grown in
the last 10 years, and (1) The field shares a border with an infested
field; or (2) the field came into contact with a regulated article
listed in Sec. 301.86-2 from an infested field within the last 10
years; or (3) within the last 10 years, the field shared ownership,
tenancy, seed, drainage or runoff, farm machinery, or other shared
cultural practices with an infested field that could allow spread of
PCN.
Paragraph (d) of Sec. 301.86-3 states that an infested field will
be removed from quarantine when a protocol approved by the
Administrator as sufficient to support removal of infested fields from
quarantine has been completed and the field has been found to be free
from PCN based on the protocol. The removal from quarantine of any
associated fields also requires steps under an approved protocol.
The PCN regulations were first established in an interim rule
published September 12, 2007 (72 FR 51975-51988, Docket No. APHIS-2006-
0143), after parts of Bingham and Bonneville Counties, ID, were
quarantined upon discovery of PCN in several potato fields in 2006. The
interim rule restricted the interstate movement of potatoes and other
regulated articles from the quarantined area to prevent the spread of
PCN to non-infested areas of the United States. We included in Sec.
301.86-3 of the interim rule the provision that an infested field will
be removed from quarantine when a 3-year biosurvey protocol approved by
APHIS has been
[[Page 7305]]
completed and the field has been found to be free of PCN. The 3-year
biosurvey protocol involves planting PCN host crops in soil from a
field and sampling the soil for PCN. This process must be repeated over
three crop cycles with negative results in order for APHIS to
deregulate a field for PCN.
On April 29, 2009 (74 FR 19374-19382, Docket No. APHIS-2006-0143),
we published a final rule based on our evaluation of public comments
that we received on the interim rule and input from an independent
science panel. Based on our review of this information, we determined
that including the 3-year biosurvey protocol in the regulations as the
only approach for deregulating fields precluded the potential use of
other methods that would be sufficient for evaluating fields for PCN,
so we broadened the approach in Sec. 301.86-3(d)(1) to read ``a
protocol approved by the Administrator as sufficient to support removal
of infested fields from quarantine.'' We stated in the final rule that
we would continue to solicit stakeholder input as we develop the field
removal protocol and update affected producers and other interested
parties on our progress.
On April 28, 2015, a group of Idaho potato farmers subject to the
PCN quarantine filed a complaint against APHIS in the U.S. District
Court in Idaho. Among the allegations in the complaint was that APHIS
violated provisions of the PPA and the Administrative Procedure Act
(APA) by not developing accessible regulations and failing to follow
notice and comment requirements of the APA. The plaintiffs alleged that
the final rule contemplated further rulemaking through the creation of
protocols to be used to support removal of infested and associated
fields from regulation. Because APHIS had not publically issued the
protocol referenced in the final rule, the plaintiffs stated they were
unclear as to what methods and data APHIS drew on in deciding whether
to deregulate infested and associated fields, making the requirements
imposed on the plaintiffs vague and impossible to satisfy. The
complaint asked the court to set aside the final rule and end the
quarantine and regulation of all fields owned and farmed by the
plaintiffs.
In a decision filed March 20, 2018,\1\ the court declined to set
aside the final rule, citing the economic value of the potato industry
and noting that ending regulation for PCN would have adverse
consequences on the State of Idaho and the United States. However, the
court ruled that APHIS did not satisfy the requirements of the APA
because the deregulation protocols ``change existing law by adding new
substantive requirements for the quarantining and deregulating of PCN
infested and associated fields to be implemented by APHIS pursuant to
its authority under the PPA.'' Accordingly, the protocols were
determined to be legislative rules for which APHIS is required to
provide a notice of availability of the protocols in the Federal
Register, provide a period for interested individuals to comment on the
protocols, and publish the adopted protocols not less than 30 days
before the effective date. The court ordered APHIS to immediately begin
the process of providing for public notice and comment on the protocols
and to satisfy the APA notice and comment requirements for all current
and future actions relating to regulation of PCN.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/USCOURTS-idd-1_15-cv-00143/pdf/USCOURTS-idd-1_15-cv-00143-2.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
We are responding to the court order in this rulemaking by
proposing to include procedures in the regulations for public notice
and comment of the PCN deregulation protocols. Although not ordered to
do so by the court, we are proposing to do the same for the criteria
APHIS uses to make initial designations of fields. We are proposing to
amend Sec. 301.86-3, paragraphs (c) and (d), to provide that any
substantive changes to the protocols will first be announced in a
Federal Register notice that informs the public of the proposed change
and solicits comment. After we review and consider public comments on
the changes, we would publish another notice in the Federal Register
informing the public of any changes we made to the protocols.
The protocols are available for comment on the Regulations.gov
website and in our reading room (see ADDRESSES above for instructions
for accessing Regulations.gov and information on the location and hours
of the reading room). We would make future versions of protocols
available on the APHIS website or upon request from any local office of
APHIS-Plant Protection and Quarantine; local offices are listed in
telephone directories.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13771 and Regulatory Flexibility Act
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
the purposes of Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget. This proposed rule is
not expected to be an Executive Order 13771 regulatory action because
this proposed rule is not significant under Executive Order 12866.
In accordance with the Regulatory Flexibility Act, we have analyzed
the potential economic effects of this action on small entities. The
analysis is summarized below. Copies of the full analysis are available
by contacting the person listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT
or on the Regulations.gov website (see ADDRESSES above for instructions
for accessing Regulations.gov).
According to the Small Business Administration, entities whose main
activity is potato farming (classified under NAICS 111211) are
considered small if they have $750,000 or less in annual receipts.
Based on the 2012 Census of Agriculture, there were about 24,000 farms
in Idaho, of which around 800 were considered to be primarily potato
farms. Bingham and Bonneville Counties had 122 and 36 potato farms,
respectively. There were about 2,000 farms in Idaho with farm sales
greater than $500,000, of which around 1,200 farms had farm sales
greater than $1 million. According to the 2012 Census, 142 of Bingham
County's 1,265 farm operations (about 11 percent) had farm sales
greater than $500,000, while in Bonneville County, 56 of the 893 farm
operations (about 6 percent) had farm sales greater than $500,000.
Although the distribution of potato farms with farm sales above
$500,000 (or $750,000) is not known, it is reasonable to conclude that
many of the potato farms in Bingham and Bonneville counties are under
the threshold and would be considered as small business entities.
However, the proposed rule would not impose new or additional
burdens on small entities as this is an administrative action for which
there would be no additional costs.
Under these circumstances, the Administrator of the Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service has determined that this action would
not have a significant economic impact on a substantial number of small
entities.
Executive Order 12372
This program/activity is listed in the Catalog of Federal Domestic
Assistance under No. 10.025 and is subject to Executive Order 12372,
which requires intergovernmental consultation with State and local
officials. (See 2 CFR chapter IV.)
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12988,
Civil Justice Reform. If this proposed rule is adopted: (1) All State
and local laws and regulations that are inconsistent with
[[Page 7306]]
this rule will be preempted; (2) no retroactive effect will be given to
this rule; and (3) administrative proceedings will not be required
before parties may file suit in court challenging this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
This proposed rule contains no reporting, recordkeeping, or third
party disclosure requirements under the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.).
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 301
Agricultural commodities, Plant diseases and pests, Quarantine,
Reporting and recordkeeping requirements, Transportation.
Accordingly, we propose to amend 7 CFR part 301 as follows:
Subpart S--Pale Cyst Nematode
0
1. The authority citation for part 301 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 7701-7772 and 7781-7786; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80,
and 371.3.
Section 301.75-15 issued under Sec. 204, Title II, Public Law
106-113, 113 Stat. 1501A-293; sections 301.75-15 and 301.75-16
issued under Sec. 203, Title II, Public Law 106-224, 114 Stat. 400
(7 U.S.C. 1421 note).
0
2. Section 301.86-3 is amended as follows:
0
a. In paragraph (a), by removing the words ``https://www.aphis.usda.gov/plant_health/plant_pest_info/potato/pcn.shtml'' and adding the words
``https://www.aphis.usda.gov/planthealth/pcn'' in their place; and
0
b. By revising paragraphs (c)(1) and (d).
The revisions read as follows:
Sec. 301.86-3 Quarantined areas.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(1) Infested fields. A field will be designated as an infested
field for pale cyst nematode upon a determination that viable pale cyst
nematode is present in the field. The determination will be made in
accordance with the criteria established by the Administrator for the
designation of infested fields. The criteria are presented in a
protocol document that may be viewed at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/planthealth/pcn. The protocol may also be obtained by request from any
local office of Plant Protection and Quarantine; local offices are
listed in telephone directories. Any substantive changes we propose to
make to the protocol will be published for comment in the Federal
Register. After we review the comments received, we will publish
another notice in the Federal Register informing the public of any
changes to the protocol.
* * * * *
(d) Removal of fields from quarantine--(1) Infested fields. An
infested field will be removed from quarantine for pale cyst nematode
upon a determination that no viable pale cyst nematode is detected in
the field. The determination will be made in accordance with criteria
established by the Administrator and sufficient to support removal of
infested fields from quarantine. The criteria are presented in a
protocol document as provided in (d)(4) of this section along with
information for viewing the protocol.
(2) Associated fields. An associated field will be removed from
quarantine for pale cyst nematode once surveys are completed and pale
cyst nematode is not detected in the field. The determination will be
made in accordance with criteria established by the Administrator and
sufficient to support removal of associated fields from quarantine. The
criteria are presented in a protocol document as provided in (d)(4) of
this section along with information for viewing the protocol.
(3) Removal of other areas from quarantine. If the Administrator
has quarantined any area other than infested or associated fields
because of its inseparability for quarantine enforcement purposes from
infested or associated fields, as provided in paragraph (a) of this
section, that area will be removed from quarantine when the relevant
infested or associated fields are removed from quarantine.
(4) Protocol for removal of fields from quarantine. The
Administrator will remove infested and associated fields, and other
areas as provided in this section, from quarantine for pale cyst
nematode in accordance with the protocols published on the Plant
Protection and Quarantine website at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/planthealth/pcn. The protocols may also be obtained by request from any
local office of Plant Protection and Quarantine; local offices are
listed in telephone directories. Any substantive changes we propose to
make to the protocols will be published for comment in the Federal
Register. After we review the comments received, we will publish
another notice in the Federal Register informing the public of any
changes to the protocols.
Done in Washington, DC, this 25th day of February 2019.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2019-03673 Filed 3-1-19; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P