Filing of Schedules by Rights Owners and Contact Information by Transmitting Entities Relating to Pre-1972 Sound Recordings, 52150-52154 [2018-22518]
Download as PDF
52150
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 16, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
We also have determined that this
regulatory action does not unduly
interfere with State, local, and Tribal
governments in the exercise of their
governmental functions.
In accordance with both Executive
orders, the Department has assessed the
potential costs and benefits, both
quantitative and qualitative, of this
regulatory action. Because the rescinded
regulations are obsolete, we do not
believe that this action will result in any
additional costs or benefits.
Regulatory Flexibility Act Certification
Pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 601(2), the
Regulatory Flexibility Act applies only
to rules for which an agency publishes
a general notice of proposed
rulemaking. The Regulatory Flexibility
Act does not apply to this rulemaking
because there is good cause to waive
notice and comment under 5 U.S.C. 553.
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
These regulations do not contain any
information collection requirements.
your search to documents published by
the Department.
ACTION:
List of Subjects
SUMMARY:
34 CFR Part 611
Colleges and universities, Elementary
and secondary education, Grant
programs-education.
34 CFR Part 614
Grant programs-education, colleges
and universities.
Dated: October 10, 2018.
Diane Auer Jones,
Principal Deputy Under Secretary Delegated
to Perform the Duties of Under Secretary and
Assistant Secretary for the Office of
Postsecondary Education.
For the reasons discussed in the
preamble, and under the authority at 20
U.S.C. 3474 and 20 U.S.C. 1221e–3, the
Secretary amends chapter VI of title 34
of the Code of Federal Regulations as
follows:
PART 611—[Removed]
1. Part 611 is removed.
Intergovernmental Review
■
These programs are subject to
Executive Order 12372 and the
regulations in 34 CFR part 79. One of
the objectives of the Executive order is
to foster an intergovernmental
partnership and a strengthened
federalism. The Executive order relies
on processes developed by State and
local governments for coordination and
review of proposed Federal financial
assistance.
Accessible Format: Individuals with
disabilities can obtain this document in
an accessible format (e.g., Braille, large
print, audiotape, or compact disc) on
request to the contact person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT.
Electronic Access to This Document:
The official version of this document is
the document published in the Federal
Register. You may access the official
edition of the Federal Register and the
Code of Federal Regulations via the
Federal Digital System at: www.gpo.gov/
fdsys. At this site you can view this
document, as well as all other
documents of this Department
published in the Federal Register, in
text or Portable Document Format
(PDF). To use PDF you must have
Adobe Acrobat Reader, which is
available free at the site.
You may also access documents of the
Department published in the Federal
Register by using the article search
feature at: www.federalregister.gov.
Specifically, through the advanced
search feature at this site, you can limit
PART 614—[Removed]
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:24 Oct 15, 2018
Jkt 247001
■
2. Part 614 is removed.
PART 636—[Removed]
■
3. Reserved part 636 is removed.
PART 649—[Removed]
■
4. Reserved part 649 is removed.
PART 680—[Removed]
■
5. Reserved part 680 is removed.
PART 693—[Removed]
■
6. Reserved part 693 is removed.
PARTS 695–699—[REMOVED]
7. Reserved parts 695–699 are
removed.
■
[FR Doc. 2018–22413 Filed 10–15–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 4000–01–P
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Copyright Office
37 CFR Part 201
[Docket No. 2018–7]
Filing of Schedules by Rights Owners
and Contact Information by
Transmitting Entities Relating to Pre1972 Sound Recordings
U.S. Copyright Office, Library
of Congress.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
Interim rule with request for
comments.
The U.S. Copyright Office is
issuing interim regulations pursuant to
the Classics Protection and Access Act,
title II of the recently enacted Orrin G.
Hatch-Bob Goodlatte Music
Modernization Act. These regulations
pertain to the filing of schedules by
rights owners listing their sound
recordings fixed before February 15,
1972, and the filing of contact
information by entities publicly
performing these sound recordings by
means of digital audio transmission. As
required under the Act, the Office is
also specifying how individuals may
request timely notification of the filing
of such schedules with the Office. These
regulations are issued on an interim
basis with opportunity for comment to
comply with statutory requirements and
to ensure that both rights owners and
transmitting entities can promptly make
use of these new filing mechanisms to
protect their respective legal interests.
The Office welcomes comment on these
interim rules.
DATES: The effective date of the interim
regulations is October 16, 2018. Written
comments must be received no later
than 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time on
November 15, 2018.
ADDRESSES: For reasons of government
efficiency, the Copyright Office is using
the regulations.gov system for the
submission and posting of public
comments in this proceeding. All
comments are therefore to be submitted
electronically through regulations.gov.
Specific instructions for submitting
comments are available on the
Copyright Office’s website at https://
www.copyright.gov/rulemaking/
pre1972-soundrecordings-schedules/. If
electronic submission of comments is
not feasible due to lack of access to a
computer and/or the internet, please
contact the Office using the contact
information below for special
instructions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Regan A. Smith, General Counsel and
Associate Register of Copyrights, by
email at regans@copyright.gov, Anna
Chauvet, Assistant General Counsel, by
email at achau@copyright.gov, or Jason
E. Sloan, Assistant General Counsel, by
email at jslo@copyright.gov. Each can be
contacted by telephone by calling (202)
707–8350.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On October 11, 2018, the president
signed into law the Orrin G. Hatch-Bob
Goodlatte Music Modernization Act,
E:\FR\FM\16OCR1.SGM
16OCR1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 16, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
H.R. 1551 (‘‘MMA’’). Title II of the
MMA, the Classics Protection and
Access Act, created chapter 14 of the
copyright law, title 17, United States
Code, which, among other things,
extends remedies for copyright
infringement to owners of sound
recordings fixed before February 15,
1972 (‘‘Pre-1972 Sound Recordings’’).
Under the provision, rights owners may
be eligible to recover statutory damages
and/or attorneys’ fees for the
unauthorized use of their Pre-1972
Sound Recordings if certain
requirements are met.
Specifically, to be eligible for these
remedies, rights owners must typically
file schedules listing their Pre-1972
Sound Recordings (‘‘Pre-1972
Schedules’’) with the U.S. Copyright
Office (the ‘‘Office’’), which are then
indexed into the Office’s public
records.1 The remedies are only
available for unauthorized uses of a
recording that have occurred more than
90 days after indexing.2 Pre-1972
Schedules must include the name of the
rights owner, title, and featured artist for
each recording listed, and ‘‘such other
information, as practicable, that the
Register of Copyrights prescribes by
regulation.’’ 3 The filing requirement ‘‘is
designed to operate in place of a formal
registration requirement that normally
applies to claims involving statutory
damages.’’ 4 In addition, the Pre-1972
Schedules are important to the Act’s
new exemption for noncommercial uses
of Pre-1972 Sound Recordings that are
not being commercially exploited.5
Under that provision, persons seeking to
use the exemption are exempt from
liability for unauthorized use if they
make a ‘‘good faith, reasonable search
for’’ a given sound recording in the
Office’s records of Pre-1972 Schedules
before determining that the recording is
not being commercially exploited.6 In
establishing a filing mechanism for Pre1972 Schedules, the Office must also
provide a means for individuals to
request and receive timely notification
1 17
U.S.C. 1401(f)(5)(A)(i)(I)–(II).
1401(f)(5)(A)(i)(II).
3 Id. 1401(f)(5)(A)(i)(I).
4 H.R. Rep. No. 115–651, at 16 (2018); see S. Rep.
No. 115–339, at 18 (2018); 17 U.S.C. 412 (stating
that generally ‘‘no award of statutory damages or of
attorney’s fees . . . Shall be made for . . . any
infringement of copyright in an unpublished work
commenced before the effective date of its
registration’’ or ‘‘any infringement of copyright
commenced after first publication of the work and
before the effective date of its registration, unless
such registration is made within three months after
the first publication of the work’’).
5 17 U.S.C. 1401(c)(1)(A)(i). The Copyright Office
is separately issuing a notice of inquiry related to
regulations the Register must promulgate regarding
this exception. See id. 1401(c)(3), (5)(A).
6 Id. 1401(c)(1)(A).
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
2 Id.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:24 Oct 15, 2018
Jkt 247001
when such filings are indexed into the
Office’s public record.7
In addition, rights owners must
provide specific notice of unauthorized
use to certain entities that were
previously transmitting Pre-1972 Sound
Recordings, before pursuing certain
remedies against them. To be entitled to
receive direct notice of unauthorized
activity from a rights owner, an entity
must have been publicly performing a
Pre-1972 Sound Recording by means of
digital audio transmission at the time of
enactment of section 1401 and must file
its contact information with the
Copyright Office within 180 days of
enactment, that is, by April 9, 2019.8
Where a valid notice of contact
information has been filed, the rights
owner may be eligible to obtain
statutory damages and/or attorneys’ fees
only after sending the transmitting
entity a notice stating that it is not
legally authorized to use the Pre-1972
Sound Recording, and identifying the
Pre-1972 Sound Recording in a schedule
conforming to the requirements by the
Office for filing Pre-1972 Schedules.9 In
addition, the unauthorized use must
have occurred 90 days after the entity
receives the notice.10 After April 9,
2019, the Office cannot accept any new
filings of contact information by
transmitting entities.11 For any eligible
transmitting entity that does not file its
contact information by April 9, 2019,
rights owners are not obligated to send
it a direct notice of unauthorized use
prior to becoming eligible for statutory
damages and/or attorneys’ fees.12
Rather, as described above, rights
owners would file Pre-1972 Schedules
with the Copyright Office, and they
would become eligible for these
remedies for unauthorized uses of a
recording occurring more than 90 days
after indexing of the schedules.13
II. Interim Rule
The Office promulgates the following
interim rule to establish and govern the
filing of Pre-1972 Schedules, the filing
of contact information by entities
publicly performing Pre-1972 Sound
Recordings by means of digital audio
transmission at the time of enactment of
section 1401 (‘‘Notice of Contact
Information’’), and the means by which
individuals may request and receive
timely notification when Pre-1972
7 Id.
1401(f)(5)(A)(ii)(II)–(III).
1401(f)(5)(B)(i)–(ii).
9 Id. 1401(f)(5)(B)(iii).
10 Id. 1401(f)(5)(B)(iii)(I).
11 Id. 1401(f)(5)(B)(ii).
12 H.R. Rep. No. 115–651, at 16 (2018); see S. Rep.
No. 115–339, at 19 (2018).
13 17 U.S.C. 1401(f)(5)(A).
8 Id.
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
52151
Schedules are indexed into the Office’s
public records.
A. Pre-1972 Schedules
Under the interim rule, rights owners
may file Pre-1972 Schedules with the
Office using a form provided on the
Office’s website. At present, the form is
an Excel spreadsheet template. This
format is required so that the Office can
timely ingest the Pre-1972 Schedules
and index them into a searchable
database available to prospective users,
including persons who may otherwise
wish to make noncommercial uses of
these works, and the general public. The
database of Pre-1972 Schedules is
available on the Office’s website at
https://copyright.gov/musicmodernization/pre1972soundrecordings/searchsoundrecordings.html.
For each sound recording, the Pre1972 Schedule must include the rights
owner’s name, the sound recording title,
and the featured artist. Rights owners
may also include additional optional
information pursuant to the instructions
on the form and the Office’s website.
For example, the Pre-1972 Schedule
may include, for each sound recording,
album title information, any alternate
sound recording title(s), the publication
date, the label name, and the rights
owner’s contact information. A rights
owner may elect to include this optional
information on a recording-by-recording
basis. In addition, the individual
submitting the Pre-1972 Schedule must
certify that she has appropriate
authority to submit the schedule and
that all information submitted to the
Office is true, accurate, and complete to
the best of the individual’s knowledge,
and is made in good faith. The Office
may reject any Pre-1972 Schedule that
fails to comply with these requirements
or any additional requirements provided
on the Office’s website or the form itself.
As noted above, for a rights owner to
be eligible to recover statutory damages
and/or attorneys’ fees for the
unauthorized use of a Pre-1972 Sound
Recording, the use must occur at least
90 days after a Pre-1972 Schedule that
includes the recording is ‘‘indexed into
the public records of the Copyright
Office’’ 14 (or 90 days after a transmitting
entity receives direct notice of
unauthorized use, if applicable 15).
Under the interim rule, a Pre-1972
Schedule will be considered ‘‘indexed’’
once it is made publicly available
through the Office’s online database of
Pre-1972 Schedules.
14 Id.
15 Id.
E:\FR\FM\16OCR1.SGM
1401(f)(5)(A)(i)(II).
1401(f)(5)(B)(iii)(I).
16OCR1
52152
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 16, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
The interim rule also states that if
ownership of a Pre-1972 Sound
Recording changes after its inclusion in
a Pre-1972 Schedule filed with the
Office, the Office will consider the
schedule to be effective as to any
successor in interest. A successor in
interest may, but is not required to file
a new schedule. The Office invites
public comments on whether it should
accept transfers of rights ownership and
other documents pertaining to a Pre1972 Sound Recording (excluding Pre1972 Schedules) for recordation, even
though they are not transfers of
copyright ownership or documents
pertaining to a copyright under 17
U.S.C. 205.
At present, the Office has not
implemented a means for rights owners
to correct limited mistakes in Pre-1972
Schedules indexed into the Office’s
public records (e.g., accidentally
misspelling the title of a sound
recording or including an errant title).
Presently, rights owners can file a new
Pre-1972 Schedule listing the sound
recording for which incorrect
information was indexed, but the
original and new Pre-1972 Schedules
would coexist in the Office’s database of
Pre-1972 Schedules, and each schedule
would have its own index date. This
treatment is consistent with the
Copyright Office’s recordation functions
generally, although the Office is
currently evaluating comments
requesting a method for correcting
errors, and has implemented a limited
provision permitting corrections for
electronic title lists.16 The Office invites
public comment on whether and how to
provide a mechanism for the correction
of limited mistakes in Pre-1972
Schedules, or adding supplemental
information about a sound recording,
including the potential effect on a
Schedule’s index date and how to keep
administrative costs low.
As required by the Music
Modernization Act, the interim
regulations also confirm that persons
may request timely notification of when
Pre-1972 Schedules are indexed into the
Office’s public records by following the
instructions provided by the Copyright
Office on its website. Presently,
individuals requesting such notification
can subscribe to a weekly email through
16 See Modernizing Copyright Recordation,
Interim Rule, 82 FR 52213, 52217 (Nov. 13, 2017).
The Office notes, however, that permitting
corrections in electronic title lists (‘‘ETL’’) would
differ from permitting corrections in Pre-1972
Schedules. An ETL is not considered part of the
recorded document; rather an ETL is only used
administratively to populate the Office’s public
record (as opposed to manually inputting
information about the document into the Office’s
public record).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:24 Oct 15, 2018
Jkt 247001
a service similar to the Office’s NewsNet
service, which will provide a link to the
Office’s online database of indexed Pre1972 Schedules. The Office’s searchable
database defaults to listing the sound
recordings with the most recent index
dates first, so individuals should easily
be able to identify recently indexed
filings.
As with similar types of filings made
with the Office, the interim rule states
that the Office does not review Pre-1972
Schedules for legal sufficiency, interpret
their content, or screen them for errors
or discrepancies.17 Rather, the Office’s
review is limited to whether the
procedural requirements established by
the Office (including payment of the
proper filing fee) have been met. Rights
owners are therefore cautioned to
review and scrutinize schedules to
assure their legal sufficiency before
submitting them to the Office.
Regarding filing fees, the Copyright
Act grants the Office authority to
establish, adjust, and recover fees for
services provided to the public.18 The
Office concludes that during the interim
period, the appropriate fee to file a Pre1972 Schedule will be the same as the
current fee to record a notice of
intention to make and distribute
phonorecords under section 115
(‘‘NOI’’).19 The Office anticipates that
the processing of Pre-1972 Schedules
will be analogous to that of processing
electronic NOIs, and so the fee should
be the same.20 There will be no fee for
individuals to request and receive
timely notifications of when Pre-1972
Schedules are indexed into the Office’s
public records.
17 For example, the Office accepts statements of
account under the section 111 cable license after a
review for ‘‘obvious errors or omissions appearing
on the face of the documents’’ (see 37 CFR
201.17(c)(2)), notices of intention under the section
115 compulsory license without review for ‘‘legal
sufficiency’’ or ‘‘errors or discrepancies’’ (see 37
CFR 201.18(g)), and agent designations made
pursuant to section 512(c)(2) without any
examination.
18 See 17 U.S.C. 708.
19 37 CFR 201.3(e)(1) (stating cost to record
section 115 NOI is $75, with an additional $10 fee
per group of 1 to 100 additional titles for electronic
filing).
20 Basing the cost of a service on the cost for a
similar service is appropriate. See Copyright Office
Fees, 83 FR 24045, 24059 (May 24, 2018) (proposing
setting new fees at the same level for ‘‘analogous’’
services). In 2017, Booz Allen Hamilton conducted
a study of the Office’s most recent fee structure.
When asked whether existing rates could be
leveraged for new group registration options, it
concluded it was appropriate if the work required
was of a similar grade and compensation level.
Booz Allen Hamilton, U.S. Copyright Office, Fee
Study Question and Answers (Dec. 2017), https://
www.copyright.gov/rulemaking/feestudy2018/fee_
study_q&a.pdf.
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
B. Notices of Contact Information
Under the interim rule, transmitting
entities may file a Notice of Contact
Information with the Office using a form
and instructions specified on the
Office’s website. The Office is using
pay.gov to receive these Notices after
determining that it is the best available
method to process these filings within
the six-month window permitted under
the statute.
The Notice of Contact Information
must include the legal name, email
address, and physical street address of
the transmitting entity to which rights
owners should send notifications of
claimed violations of 17 U.S.C.
1401(a).21 Related or affiliated
transmitting entities that are separate
legal entities (e.g., corporate parents and
subsidiaries) are considered separate
transmitting entities, and each must file
its own separate Notice of Contact
Information. But the Notice of Contact
Information may include alternate
names for the transmitting entity that
the public may use to identify a specific
legal entity, including names under
which the transmitting entity is doing
business and other commonly used
names. Separate legal entities are not
considered alternate names. The Notice
of Contact Information shall also
include the website(s) and/or
application(s) through which the
transmitting entity publicly performs
Pre-1972 Sound Recordings by means of
digital audio transmission. Finally, the
Notice of Contact Information must
include a certification that the
transmitting entity was publicly
performing Pre-1972 Sound Recordings
by means of digital audio transmission
as of October 11, 2018, that the
individual submitting the notice has
appropriate authority to submit the
notice, and that all information
submitted to the Office is true, accurate,
and complete to the best of the
individual’s knowledge, and is made in
good faith. The Office may reject any
Notice of Contact Information that fails
to comply with these requirements or
any additional requirements provided
on the Office’s website or the form itself.
If an entity submits a Notice of
Contact Information following the
instructions provided by the Office,
including paying the appropriate fee,
the Office will make the Notice publicly
available in a searchable online
directory, available on the Office’s
website at https://copyright.gov/musicmodernization/pre1972soundrecordings/notices-contact21 The Office is requiring a physical street address
so that rights owners may use delivery methods that
allow for tracking and/or delivery confirmation.
E:\FR\FM\16OCR1.SGM
16OCR1
52153
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 16, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
information.html. If a transmitting
entity includes alternate names in its
Notice of Contact Information, users
will be able to search on those names to
locate the transmitting entity’s Notice of
Contact Information.
The Office concludes that during the
interim period, the appropriate fee to
file a Notice of Contact Information will
be similar to the fee previously in effect
for service providers to designate an
agent to receive notifications of claimed
copyright infringement under 17 U.S.C.
512(c).22 The Office anticipates that the
processing of Notices of Contact
Information will be analogous to how
designations of agents were processed
prior to the existing Digital Millennium
Copyright Act (‘‘DMCA’’) designated
agent directory.23 Following that model,
the interim rule assesses an additional
cost to process alternate names
submitted by the transmitting entity.24
III. Request for Comments
These interim regulations will go into
effect immediately after publication of
this document in the Federal Register.
Comments will be due 30 days
thereafter. The Copyright Office is
issuing these interim regulations after
finding, for good cause, that notice and
public procedure prior to their issuance
would be impracticable and contrary to
the public interest.25 The MMA requires
swift action by the Office. The Office
must issue regulations regarding the
filing of Notices of Contact Information
within 30 days of enactment, and
transmitting entities have only 180 days
within which they may file these
Notices.26 Similarly, while the Office
has 180 days to establish regulations
regarding the form and submission of
Pre-1972 Schedules, this filing serves as
a gating factor to rights owners being
eligible for statutory damages and/or
attorneys’ fees for unauthorized uses of
Pre-1972 Sound Recordings, as well as
the ability of persons to search these
schedules before determining whether a
given sound recording is being
commercialized or is available for the
noncommercial use exception.27 The
interim rule will also inform the Office’s
concurrent rulemaking regarding the
criteria for a good faith search to make
use of the exception for noncommercial
uses of sound recordings.28 The Office
concludes that a prompt interim rule
best serves the legal interests of all
relevant stakeholders as well as the
general public. Thus, notice and
comment is not required under the
Administrative Procedure Act.29
List of Subjects in 37 CFR Part 201
Copyright, General provisions.
Interim Regulations
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Copyright Office amends
37 CFR part 201 as follows:
PART 201—GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. The authority citation for part 201
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 702.
2. Amend § 201.3 as follows:
a. Redesignate paragraphs (c)(19) and
(20) as paragraphs (c)(21) and (22),
respectively.
■ b. Add new paragraphs (c)(19) and
(20) to read as follows:
■
■
§ 201.3 Fees for registration, recordation,
and related services, special services, and
services performed by the Licensing
Division.
*
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
Fees
($)
Registration, recordation and related services
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
(19) Notice of contact information for transmitting entities publicly performing pre-1972 sound recordings by means of digital audio
transmission, or amendment of contact information ................................................................................................................................
Alternate names (each) ...............................................................................................................................................................................
(20) Schedule of pre-1972 sound recordings (single title) ..........................................................................................................................
Additional titles (per group of 1 to 100 titles) ..............................................................................................................................................
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
3. Amend § 201.4 by adding
paragraphs (b)(12) and (13) to read as
follows:
■
§ 201.4 Recordation of transfers and other
documents pertaining to copyright.
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(12) Notices of contact information for
transmitting entities publicly
performing pre-1972 sound recordings
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
*
22 37 CFR 201.3(c)(17) (2016) (cost of $105 to
record designation of agent under section 512(c)(2),
with additional $35 fee per group of 1 to 10
additional names). In 2016, the Office launched a
new database to designate an agent, which required
less Office processing and so the Office lowered the
filing fee to $6. 37 CFR 201.3(c)(17) (2017).
23 See Old Directory of DMCA Designated Agents
1998–2016, U.S. Copyright Office, https://
www.copyright.gov/onlinesp/list/a_agents.html.
24 Because of the time sensitivity regarding the
processing of Notices of Contact Information and
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:24 Oct 15, 2018
Jkt 247001
*
*
by means of digital audio transmission
(17 U.S.C. 1401(f)(5)(B); see § 201.36).
(13) Schedules of pre-1972 sound
recordings (17 U.S.C. 1401(f)(5)(A); see
§ 201.35).
*
*
*
*
*
■ 4. Add § 201.35 to read as follows:
§ 201.35 Schedules of pre-1972 sound
recordings.
(a) General. This section prescribes
the rules under which rights owners,
additional work required by the Office, the
additional cost will be $35 per alternate name
listed.
25 In the past, the Copyright Office has similarly
issued interim rules upon the enactment of
legislation before soliciting public comments. See,
e.g., Freedom of Information Act Regulations, 82 FR
9505, 9506 (Feb. 7, 2017) (issuing interim rule to
implement the FOIA Improvements Act because
‘‘allowing for notice and public procedure prior to
the issuance of . . . interim regulations would be
impracticable’’); Designation of Agent to Receive
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
*
105
35
75
10
*
pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 1401(f)(5)(A), may
file schedules listing their pre-1972
sound recordings with the Copyright
Office to be eligible for statutory
damages and/or attorneys’ fees for
violations of 17 U.S.C. 1401(a).
(b) Definitions. For purposes of this
section:
(1) Unless otherwise specified, the
terms used have the meanings set forth
in 17 U.S.C. 1401.
Notification of Claimed Infringement, 63 FR 59233,
59234 (Nov. 3, 1998) (issuing interim rule regarding
designation of agent after enactment of the DMCA
because ‘‘online service providers may wish
immediately to designate agents to receive
notification of claimed infringement’’).
26 17 U.S.C. 1401(f)(5)(B).
27 Id. 1401(c)(1)(A), (f)(5)(A).
28 Id. 1401(c)(1)(A).
29 See 5 U.S.C. 553(b), (d)(3); Phila. Citizen in
Action v. Schweiker, 669 F.2d 877, 884–85 (3d Cir.
1982).
E:\FR\FM\16OCR1.SGM
16OCR1
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with RULES
52154
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 200 / Tuesday, October 16, 2018 / Rules and Regulations
(2) A pre-1972 sound recording is a
sound recording fixed before February
15, 1972.
(c) Form and submission. A rights
owner seeking to comply with 17 U.S.C.
1401(f)(5)(A) must submit a schedule
listing the owner’s pre-1972 sound
recordings using an appropriate form
provided by the Copyright Office on its
website and following the instructions
for completion and submission
provided on the Office’s website or the
form itself. The Office may reject any
submission that fails to comply with
these requirements.
(d) Content. A schedule of pre-1972
sound recordings shall contain the
following:
(1) For each sound recording listed,
the right’s owner name, sound recording
title, and featured artist;
(2) A certification that the individual
submitting the schedule of pre-1972
sound recordings has appropriate
authority to submit the schedule and
that all information submitted to the
Office is true, accurate, and complete to
the best of the individual’s knowledge,
information, and belief, and is made in
good faith.
(3) For each sound recording listed,
the rights owner may opt to include
additional information as permitted and
in the format specified by the Office’s
form or instructions, such as publication
date, or alternate title information.
(e) Transfer of rights ownership. If
ownership of a pre-1972 sound
recording changes after its inclusion in
a schedule filed with the Office under
this section, the Office will consider the
schedule to be effective as to any
successor in interest. A successor in
interest may, but is not required, to file
a new schedule under this section.
(f) Legal sufficiency of schedules. The
Copyright Office does not review
schedules submitted under paragraph
(c) of this section for legal sufficiency,
interpret their content, or screen them
for errors or discrepancies. The Office’s
review is limited to whether the
procedural requirements established by
the Office (including payment of the
proper filing fee) have been met. Rights
owners are therefore cautioned to
review and scrutinize schedules to
assure their legal sufficiency before
submitting them to the Office.
(g) Filing date. The date of filing of a
schedule of pre-1972 sound recordings
is the date when a proper submission,
including the prescribed fee, is received
in the Copyright Office. The filing date
may not necessarily be the same date
that the schedule, for purposes of 17
U.S.C. 1401(f)(5)(A)(i)(II), is indexed
into the Office’s public records.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:24 Oct 15, 2018
Jkt 247001
(h) Fee. The filing fee to submit a
schedule of pre-1972 sound recordings
pursuant to this section is prescribed in
§ 201.3(c).
(i) Third-party notification. A person
may request timely notification of
filings made under this section by
following the instructions provided by
the Copyright Office on its website.
■ 5. Add § 201.36 to read as follows:
§ 201.36 Notices of contact information for
transmitting entities publicly performing
pre-1972 sound recordings.
(a) General. This section prescribes
the rules under which transmitting
entities may file contact information
with the Copyright Office pursuant to 17
U.S.C. 1401(f)(5)(B).
(b) Definitions. For purposes of this
section:
(1) Unless otherwise specified, the
terms used have the meanings set forth
in 17 U.S.C. 1401.
(2) A pre-1972 sound recording is a
sound recording fixed before February
15, 1972.
(3) A transmitting entity is an entity
that, as of October 11, 2018, publicly
performs pre-1972 sound recordings by
means of digital audio transmission.
(c) Form and submission. A
transmitting entity seeking to comply
with 17 U.S.C. 1401(f)(5)(B) must
submit contact information using an
appropriate form specified by the
Copyright Office on its website and
following the instructions for
completion and submission provided on
the Office’s website or the form itself.
The Office may reject any submission
that fails to comply with these
requirements. No notice or amended
notice received after April 9, 2019 will
be accepted by the Office.
(d) Content. A notice submitted under
paragraph (c) of this section shall
contain the following, in addition to any
other information required on the
Office’s form or website:
(1) The full legal name, email address,
and physical street address of the
transmitting entity to which rights
owners should send notifications of
claimed violations of 17 U.S.C. 1401(a).
A post office box may not be substituted
for the street address of a transmitting
entity. Related or affiliated transmitting
entities that are separate legal entities
(e.g., corporate parents and subsidiaries)
are considered separate transmitting
entities, and each must file its own
separate notice of contact information.
(2) The website(s) and/or
application(s) through which the
transmitting entity publicly performs
pre-1972 sound recordings by means of
digital audio transmission.
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4700
Sfmt 4700
(3) A certification that the
transmitting entity was publicly
performing pre-1972 sound recordings
by means of digital audio transmission
as of October 11, 2018.
(4) A certification that the individual
submitting the notice has appropriate
authority to submit the notice and that
all information submitted to the Office
is true, accurate, and complete to the
best of the individual’s knowledge,
information, and belief, and is made in
good faith.
(5) The transmitting entity may opt to
include alternate names for which the
transmitting entity seeks application of
17 U.S.C. 1401(f)(5)(B)(iii), such as
names that the public would be likely
to use to search for the transmitting
entity in the Copyright Office’s online
directory of transmitting entities
publicly performing pre-1972 sound
recordings by means of digital audio
transmission, including names under
which the transmitting entity is doing
business and other commonly used
names. Separate legal entities are not
considered alternate names.
(e) Fee. The filing fee to submit a
notice of contact information pursuant
to this section is prescribed in
§ 201.3(c).
Dated: October 11, 2018.
Karyn A. Temple,
Acting Register of Copyrights and Director
of the U.S. Copyright Office.
Approved by:
Carla D. Hayden,
Librarian of Congress.
[FR Doc. 2018–22518 Filed 10–15–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410–30–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
39 CFR Part 3010
[Docket No. RM2016–6; Order No. 4850]
Mail Preparation Changes
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Final rule.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commission adopts a
final rule concerning mail preparation
changes. The rule as adopted removes
reference to procedures relying on the
existence of a substantive standard for
mail preparation changes in response to
the recent decision in United States
Postal Serv. v. Postal Reg. Comm’n, 886
F.3d 1253 (D.C. Cir. 2018).
DATES: Effective November 15, 2018.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202–789–6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\16OCR1.SGM
16OCR1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 200 (Tuesday, October 16, 2018)]
[Rules and Regulations]
[Pages 52150-52154]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-22518]
=======================================================================
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Copyright Office
37 CFR Part 201
[Docket No. 2018-7]
Filing of Schedules by Rights Owners and Contact Information by
Transmitting Entities Relating to Pre-1972 Sound Recordings
AGENCY: U.S. Copyright Office, Library of Congress.
ACTION: Interim rule with request for comments.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Copyright Office is issuing interim regulations
pursuant to the Classics Protection and Access Act, title II of the
recently enacted Orrin G. Hatch-Bob Goodlatte Music Modernization Act.
These regulations pertain to the filing of schedules by rights owners
listing their sound recordings fixed before February 15, 1972, and the
filing of contact information by entities publicly performing these
sound recordings by means of digital audio transmission. As required
under the Act, the Office is also specifying how individuals may
request timely notification of the filing of such schedules with the
Office. These regulations are issued on an interim basis with
opportunity for comment to comply with statutory requirements and to
ensure that both rights owners and transmitting entities can promptly
make use of these new filing mechanisms to protect their respective
legal interests. The Office welcomes comment on these interim rules.
DATES: The effective date of the interim regulations is October 16,
2018. Written comments must be received no later than 11:59 p.m.
Eastern Time on November 15, 2018.
ADDRESSES: For reasons of government efficiency, the Copyright Office
is using the regulations.gov system for the submission and posting of
public comments in this proceeding. All comments are therefore to be
submitted electronically through regulations.gov. Specific instructions
for submitting comments are available on the Copyright Office's website
at https://www.copyright.gov/rulemaking/pre1972-soundrecordings-schedules/. If electronic submission of comments is not feasible due to
lack of access to a computer and/or the internet, please contact the
Office using the contact information below for special instructions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Regan A. Smith, General Counsel and
Associate Register of Copyrights, by email at [email protected],
Anna Chauvet, Assistant General Counsel, by email at
[email protected], or Jason E. Sloan, Assistant General Counsel, by
email at [email protected]. Each can be contacted by telephone by
calling (202) 707-8350.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
On October 11, 2018, the president signed into law the Orrin G.
Hatch-Bob Goodlatte Music Modernization Act,
[[Page 52151]]
H.R. 1551 (``MMA''). Title II of the MMA, the Classics Protection and
Access Act, created chapter 14 of the copyright law, title 17, United
States Code, which, among other things, extends remedies for copyright
infringement to owners of sound recordings fixed before February 15,
1972 (``Pre-1972 Sound Recordings''). Under the provision, rights
owners may be eligible to recover statutory damages and/or attorneys'
fees for the unauthorized use of their Pre-1972 Sound Recordings if
certain requirements are met.
Specifically, to be eligible for these remedies, rights owners must
typically file schedules listing their Pre-1972 Sound Recordings
(``Pre-1972 Schedules'') with the U.S. Copyright Office (the
``Office''), which are then indexed into the Office's public
records.\1\ The remedies are only available for unauthorized uses of a
recording that have occurred more than 90 days after indexing.\2\ Pre-
1972 Schedules must include the name of the rights owner, title, and
featured artist for each recording listed, and ``such other
information, as practicable, that the Register of Copyrights prescribes
by regulation.'' \3\ The filing requirement ``is designed to operate in
place of a formal registration requirement that normally applies to
claims involving statutory damages.'' \4\ In addition, the Pre-1972
Schedules are important to the Act's new exemption for noncommercial
uses of Pre-1972 Sound Recordings that are not being commercially
exploited.\5\ Under that provision, persons seeking to use the
exemption are exempt from liability for unauthorized use if they make a
``good faith, reasonable search for'' a given sound recording in the
Office's records of Pre-1972 Schedules before determining that the
recording is not being commercially exploited.\6\ In establishing a
filing mechanism for Pre-1972 Schedules, the Office must also provide a
means for individuals to request and receive timely notification when
such filings are indexed into the Office's public record.\7\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ 17 U.S.C. 1401(f)(5)(A)(i)(I)-(II).
\2\ Id. 1401(f)(5)(A)(i)(II).
\3\ Id. 1401(f)(5)(A)(i)(I).
\4\ H.R. Rep. No. 115-651, at 16 (2018); see S. Rep. No. 115-
339, at 18 (2018); 17 U.S.C. 412 (stating that generally ``no award
of statutory damages or of attorney's fees . . . Shall be made for .
. . any infringement of copyright in an unpublished work commenced
before the effective date of its registration'' or ``any
infringement of copyright commenced after first publication of the
work and before the effective date of its registration, unless such
registration is made within three months after the first publication
of the work'').
\5\ 17 U.S.C. 1401(c)(1)(A)(i). The Copyright Office is
separately issuing a notice of inquiry related to regulations the
Register must promulgate regarding this exception. See id.
1401(c)(3), (5)(A).
\6\ Id. 1401(c)(1)(A).
\7\ Id. 1401(f)(5)(A)(ii)(II)-(III).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, rights owners must provide specific notice of
unauthorized use to certain entities that were previously transmitting
Pre-1972 Sound Recordings, before pursuing certain remedies against
them. To be entitled to receive direct notice of unauthorized activity
from a rights owner, an entity must have been publicly performing a
Pre-1972 Sound Recording by means of digital audio transmission at the
time of enactment of section 1401 and must file its contact information
with the Copyright Office within 180 days of enactment, that is, by
April 9, 2019.\8\ Where a valid notice of contact information has been
filed, the rights owner may be eligible to obtain statutory damages
and/or attorneys' fees only after sending the transmitting entity a
notice stating that it is not legally authorized to use the Pre-1972
Sound Recording, and identifying the Pre-1972 Sound Recording in a
schedule conforming to the requirements by the Office for filing Pre-
1972 Schedules.\9\ In addition, the unauthorized use must have occurred
90 days after the entity receives the notice.\10\ After April 9, 2019,
the Office cannot accept any new filings of contact information by
transmitting entities.\11\ For any eligible transmitting entity that
does not file its contact information by April 9, 2019, rights owners
are not obligated to send it a direct notice of unauthorized use prior
to becoming eligible for statutory damages and/or attorneys' fees.\12\
Rather, as described above, rights owners would file Pre-1972 Schedules
with the Copyright Office, and they would become eligible for these
remedies for unauthorized uses of a recording occurring more than 90
days after indexing of the schedules.\13\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ Id. 1401(f)(5)(B)(i)-(ii).
\9\ Id. 1401(f)(5)(B)(iii).
\10\ Id. 1401(f)(5)(B)(iii)(I).
\11\ Id. 1401(f)(5)(B)(ii).
\12\ H.R. Rep. No. 115-651, at 16 (2018); see S. Rep. No. 115-
339, at 19 (2018).
\13\ 17 U.S.C. 1401(f)(5)(A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
II. Interim Rule
The Office promulgates the following interim rule to establish and
govern the filing of Pre-1972 Schedules, the filing of contact
information by entities publicly performing Pre-1972 Sound Recordings
by means of digital audio transmission at the time of enactment of
section 1401 (``Notice of Contact Information''), and the means by
which individuals may request and receive timely notification when Pre-
1972 Schedules are indexed into the Office's public records.
A. Pre-1972 Schedules
Under the interim rule, rights owners may file Pre-1972 Schedules
with the Office using a form provided on the Office's website. At
present, the form is an Excel spreadsheet template. This format is
required so that the Office can timely ingest the Pre-1972 Schedules
and index them into a searchable database available to prospective
users, including persons who may otherwise wish to make noncommercial
uses of these works, and the general public. The database of Pre-1972
Schedules is available on the Office's website at https://copyright.gov/music-modernization/pre1972-soundrecordings/search-soundrecordings.html.
For each sound recording, the Pre-1972 Schedule must include the
rights owner's name, the sound recording title, and the featured
artist. Rights owners may also include additional optional information
pursuant to the instructions on the form and the Office's website. For
example, the Pre-1972 Schedule may include, for each sound recording,
album title information, any alternate sound recording title(s), the
publication date, the label name, and the rights owner's contact
information. A rights owner may elect to include this optional
information on a recording-by-recording basis. In addition, the
individual submitting the Pre-1972 Schedule must certify that she has
appropriate authority to submit the schedule and that all information
submitted to the Office is true, accurate, and complete to the best of
the individual's knowledge, and is made in good faith. The Office may
reject any Pre-1972 Schedule that fails to comply with these
requirements or any additional requirements provided on the Office's
website or the form itself.
As noted above, for a rights owner to be eligible to recover
statutory damages and/or attorneys' fees for the unauthorized use of a
Pre-1972 Sound Recording, the use must occur at least 90 days after a
Pre-1972 Schedule that includes the recording is ``indexed into the
public records of the Copyright Office'' \14\ (or 90 days after a
transmitting entity receives direct notice of unauthorized use, if
applicable \15\). Under the interim rule, a Pre-1972 Schedule will be
considered ``indexed'' once it is made publicly available through the
Office's online database of Pre-1972 Schedules.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ Id. 1401(f)(5)(A)(i)(II).
\15\ Id. 1401(f)(5)(B)(iii)(I).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
[[Page 52152]]
The interim rule also states that if ownership of a Pre-1972 Sound
Recording changes after its inclusion in a Pre-1972 Schedule filed with
the Office, the Office will consider the schedule to be effective as to
any successor in interest. A successor in interest may, but is not
required to file a new schedule. The Office invites public comments on
whether it should accept transfers of rights ownership and other
documents pertaining to a Pre-1972 Sound Recording (excluding Pre-1972
Schedules) for recordation, even though they are not transfers of
copyright ownership or documents pertaining to a copyright under 17
U.S.C. 205.
At present, the Office has not implemented a means for rights
owners to correct limited mistakes in Pre-1972 Schedules indexed into
the Office's public records (e.g., accidentally misspelling the title
of a sound recording or including an errant title). Presently, rights
owners can file a new Pre-1972 Schedule listing the sound recording for
which incorrect information was indexed, but the original and new Pre-
1972 Schedules would coexist in the Office's database of Pre-1972
Schedules, and each schedule would have its own index date. This
treatment is consistent with the Copyright Office's recordation
functions generally, although the Office is currently evaluating
comments requesting a method for correcting errors, and has implemented
a limited provision permitting corrections for electronic title
lists.\16\ The Office invites public comment on whether and how to
provide a mechanism for the correction of limited mistakes in Pre-1972
Schedules, or adding supplemental information about a sound recording,
including the potential effect on a Schedule's index date and how to
keep administrative costs low.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\16\ See Modernizing Copyright Recordation, Interim Rule, 82 FR
52213, 52217 (Nov. 13, 2017). The Office notes, however, that
permitting corrections in electronic title lists (``ETL'') would
differ from permitting corrections in Pre-1972 Schedules. An ETL is
not considered part of the recorded document; rather an ETL is only
used administratively to populate the Office's public record (as
opposed to manually inputting information about the document into
the Office's public record).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As required by the Music Modernization Act, the interim regulations
also confirm that persons may request timely notification of when Pre-
1972 Schedules are indexed into the Office's public records by
following the instructions provided by the Copyright Office on its
website. Presently, individuals requesting such notification can
subscribe to a weekly email through a service similar to the Office's
NewsNet service, which will provide a link to the Office's online
database of indexed Pre-1972 Schedules. The Office's searchable
database defaults to listing the sound recordings with the most recent
index dates first, so individuals should easily be able to identify
recently indexed filings.
As with similar types of filings made with the Office, the interim
rule states that the Office does not review Pre-1972 Schedules for
legal sufficiency, interpret their content, or screen them for errors
or discrepancies.\17\ Rather, the Office's review is limited to whether
the procedural requirements established by the Office (including
payment of the proper filing fee) have been met. Rights owners are
therefore cautioned to review and scrutinize schedules to assure their
legal sufficiency before submitting them to the Office.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ For example, the Office accepts statements of account under
the section 111 cable license after a review for ``obvious errors or
omissions appearing on the face of the documents'' (see 37 CFR
201.17(c)(2)), notices of intention under the section 115 compulsory
license without review for ``legal sufficiency'' or ``errors or
discrepancies'' (see 37 CFR 201.18(g)), and agent designations made
pursuant to section 512(c)(2) without any examination.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regarding filing fees, the Copyright Act grants the Office
authority to establish, adjust, and recover fees for services provided
to the public.\18\ The Office concludes that during the interim period,
the appropriate fee to file a Pre-1972 Schedule will be the same as the
current fee to record a notice of intention to make and distribute
phonorecords under section 115 (``NOI'').\19\ The Office anticipates
that the processing of Pre-1972 Schedules will be analogous to that of
processing electronic NOIs, and so the fee should be the same.\20\
There will be no fee for individuals to request and receive timely
notifications of when Pre-1972 Schedules are indexed into the Office's
public records.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ See 17 U.S.C. 708.
\19\ 37 CFR 201.3(e)(1) (stating cost to record section 115 NOI
is $75, with an additional $10 fee per group of 1 to 100 additional
titles for electronic filing).
\20\ Basing the cost of a service on the cost for a similar
service is appropriate. See Copyright Office Fees, 83 FR 24045,
24059 (May 24, 2018) (proposing setting new fees at the same level
for ``analogous'' services). In 2017, Booz Allen Hamilton conducted
a study of the Office's most recent fee structure. When asked
whether existing rates could be leveraged for new group registration
options, it concluded it was appropriate if the work required was of
a similar grade and compensation level. Booz Allen Hamilton, U.S.
Copyright Office, Fee Study Question and Answers (Dec. 2017),
https://www.copyright.gov/rulemaking/feestudy2018/fee_study_q&a.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Notices of Contact Information
Under the interim rule, transmitting entities may file a Notice of
Contact Information with the Office using a form and instructions
specified on the Office's website. The Office is using pay.gov to
receive these Notices after determining that it is the best available
method to process these filings within the six-month window permitted
under the statute.
The Notice of Contact Information must include the legal name,
email address, and physical street address of the transmitting entity
to which rights owners should send notifications of claimed violations
of 17 U.S.C. 1401(a).\21\ Related or affiliated transmitting entities
that are separate legal entities (e.g., corporate parents and
subsidiaries) are considered separate transmitting entities, and each
must file its own separate Notice of Contact Information. But the
Notice of Contact Information may include alternate names for the
transmitting entity that the public may use to identify a specific
legal entity, including names under which the transmitting entity is
doing business and other commonly used names. Separate legal entities
are not considered alternate names. The Notice of Contact Information
shall also include the website(s) and/or application(s) through which
the transmitting entity publicly performs Pre-1972 Sound Recordings by
means of digital audio transmission. Finally, the Notice of Contact
Information must include a certification that the transmitting entity
was publicly performing Pre-1972 Sound Recordings by means of digital
audio transmission as of October 11, 2018, that the individual
submitting the notice has appropriate authority to submit the notice,
and that all information submitted to the Office is true, accurate, and
complete to the best of the individual's knowledge, and is made in good
faith. The Office may reject any Notice of Contact Information that
fails to comply with these requirements or any additional requirements
provided on the Office's website or the form itself.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ The Office is requiring a physical street address so that
rights owners may use delivery methods that allow for tracking and/
or delivery confirmation.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
If an entity submits a Notice of Contact Information following the
instructions provided by the Office, including paying the appropriate
fee, the Office will make the Notice publicly available in a searchable
online directory, available on the Office's website at https://
copyright.gov/music-modernization/pre1972-soundrecordings/notices-
contact-
[[Page 52153]]
information.html. If a transmitting entity includes alternate names in
its Notice of Contact Information, users will be able to search on
those names to locate the transmitting entity's Notice of Contact
Information.
The Office concludes that during the interim period, the
appropriate fee to file a Notice of Contact Information will be similar
to the fee previously in effect for service providers to designate an
agent to receive notifications of claimed copyright infringement under
17 U.S.C. 512(c).\22\ The Office anticipates that the processing of
Notices of Contact Information will be analogous to how designations of
agents were processed prior to the existing Digital Millennium
Copyright Act (``DMCA'') designated agent directory.\23\ Following that
model, the interim rule assesses an additional cost to process
alternate names submitted by the transmitting entity.\24\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ 37 CFR 201.3(c)(17) (2016) (cost of $105 to record
designation of agent under section 512(c)(2), with additional $35
fee per group of 1 to 10 additional names). In 2016, the Office
launched a new database to designate an agent, which required less
Office processing and so the Office lowered the filing fee to $6. 37
CFR 201.3(c)(17) (2017).
\23\ See Old Directory of DMCA Designated Agents 1998-2016, U.S.
Copyright Office, https://www.copyright.gov/onlinesp/list/a_agents.html.
\24\ Because of the time sensitivity regarding the processing of
Notices of Contact Information and additional work required by the
Office, the additional cost will be $35 per alternate name listed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Request for Comments
These interim regulations will go into effect immediately after
publication of this document in the Federal Register. Comments will be
due 30 days thereafter. The Copyright Office is issuing these interim
regulations after finding, for good cause, that notice and public
procedure prior to their issuance would be impracticable and contrary
to the public interest.\25\ The MMA requires swift action by the
Office. The Office must issue regulations regarding the filing of
Notices of Contact Information within 30 days of enactment, and
transmitting entities have only 180 days within which they may file
these Notices.\26\ Similarly, while the Office has 180 days to
establish regulations regarding the form and submission of Pre-1972
Schedules, this filing serves as a gating factor to rights owners being
eligible for statutory damages and/or attorneys' fees for unauthorized
uses of Pre-1972 Sound Recordings, as well as the ability of persons to
search these schedules before determining whether a given sound
recording is being commercialized or is available for the noncommercial
use exception.\27\ The interim rule will also inform the Office's
concurrent rulemaking regarding the criteria for a good faith search to
make use of the exception for noncommercial uses of sound
recordings.\28\ The Office concludes that a prompt interim rule best
serves the legal interests of all relevant stakeholders as well as the
general public. Thus, notice and comment is not required under the
Administrative Procedure Act.\29\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\25\ In the past, the Copyright Office has similarly issued
interim rules upon the enactment of legislation before soliciting
public comments. See, e.g., Freedom of Information Act Regulations,
82 FR 9505, 9506 (Feb. 7, 2017) (issuing interim rule to implement
the FOIA Improvements Act because ``allowing for notice and public
procedure prior to the issuance of . . . interim regulations would
be impracticable''); Designation of Agent to Receive Notification of
Claimed Infringement, 63 FR 59233, 59234 (Nov. 3, 1998) (issuing
interim rule regarding designation of agent after enactment of the
DMCA because ``online service providers may wish immediately to
designate agents to receive notification of claimed infringement'').
\26\ 17 U.S.C. 1401(f)(5)(B).
\27\ Id. 1401(c)(1)(A), (f)(5)(A).
\28\ Id. 1401(c)(1)(A).
\29\ See 5 U.S.C. 553(b), (d)(3); Phila. Citizen in Action v.
Schweiker, 669 F.2d 877, 884-85 (3d Cir. 1982).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
List of Subjects in 37 CFR Part 201
Copyright, General provisions.
Interim Regulations
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Copyright Office
amends 37 CFR part 201 as follows:
PART 201--GENERAL PROVISIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 201 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 702.
0
2. Amend Sec. 201.3 as follows:
0
a. Redesignate paragraphs (c)(19) and (20) as paragraphs (c)(21) and
(22), respectively.
0
b. Add new paragraphs (c)(19) and (20) to read as follows:
Sec. 201.3 Fees for registration, recordation, and related services,
special services, and services performed by the Licensing Division.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Registration, recordation and related services Fees ($)
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * * * *
(19) Notice of contact information for transmitting entities 105
publicly performing pre-1972 sound recordings by means of
digital audio transmission, or amendment of contact
information.................................................
Alternate names (each)....................................... 35
(20) Schedule of pre-1972 sound recordings (single title).... 75
Additional titles (per group of 1 to 100 titles)............. 10
* * * * * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
0
3. Amend Sec. 201.4 by adding paragraphs (b)(12) and (13) to read as
follows:
Sec. 201.4 Recordation of transfers and other documents pertaining to
copyright.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(12) Notices of contact information for transmitting entities
publicly performing pre-1972 sound recordings by means of digital audio
transmission (17 U.S.C. 1401(f)(5)(B); see Sec. 201.36).
(13) Schedules of pre-1972 sound recordings (17 U.S.C.
1401(f)(5)(A); see Sec. 201.35).
* * * * *
0
4. Add Sec. 201.35 to read as follows:
Sec. 201.35 Schedules of pre-1972 sound recordings.
(a) General. This section prescribes the rules under which rights
owners, pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 1401(f)(5)(A), may file schedules listing
their pre-1972 sound recordings with the Copyright Office to be
eligible for statutory damages and/or attorneys' fees for violations of
17 U.S.C. 1401(a).
(b) Definitions. For purposes of this section:
(1) Unless otherwise specified, the terms used have the meanings
set forth in 17 U.S.C. 1401.
[[Page 52154]]
(2) A pre-1972 sound recording is a sound recording fixed before
February 15, 1972.
(c) Form and submission. A rights owner seeking to comply with 17
U.S.C. 1401(f)(5)(A) must submit a schedule listing the owner's pre-
1972 sound recordings using an appropriate form provided by the
Copyright Office on its website and following the instructions for
completion and submission provided on the Office's website or the form
itself. The Office may reject any submission that fails to comply with
these requirements.
(d) Content. A schedule of pre-1972 sound recordings shall contain
the following:
(1) For each sound recording listed, the right's owner name, sound
recording title, and featured artist;
(2) A certification that the individual submitting the schedule of
pre-1972 sound recordings has appropriate authority to submit the
schedule and that all information submitted to the Office is true,
accurate, and complete to the best of the individual's knowledge,
information, and belief, and is made in good faith.
(3) For each sound recording listed, the rights owner may opt to
include additional information as permitted and in the format specified
by the Office's form or instructions, such as publication date, or
alternate title information.
(e) Transfer of rights ownership. If ownership of a pre-1972 sound
recording changes after its inclusion in a schedule filed with the
Office under this section, the Office will consider the schedule to be
effective as to any successor in interest. A successor in interest may,
but is not required, to file a new schedule under this section.
(f) Legal sufficiency of schedules. The Copyright Office does not
review schedules submitted under paragraph (c) of this section for
legal sufficiency, interpret their content, or screen them for errors
or discrepancies. The Office's review is limited to whether the
procedural requirements established by the Office (including payment of
the proper filing fee) have been met. Rights owners are therefore
cautioned to review and scrutinize schedules to assure their legal
sufficiency before submitting them to the Office.
(g) Filing date. The date of filing of a schedule of pre-1972 sound
recordings is the date when a proper submission, including the
prescribed fee, is received in the Copyright Office. The filing date
may not necessarily be the same date that the schedule, for purposes of
17 U.S.C. 1401(f)(5)(A)(i)(II), is indexed into the Office's public
records.
(h) Fee. The filing fee to submit a schedule of pre-1972 sound
recordings pursuant to this section is prescribed in Sec. 201.3(c).
(i) Third-party notification. A person may request timely
notification of filings made under this section by following the
instructions provided by the Copyright Office on its website.
0
5. Add Sec. 201.36 to read as follows:
Sec. 201.36 Notices of contact information for transmitting entities
publicly performing pre-1972 sound recordings.
(a) General. This section prescribes the rules under which
transmitting entities may file contact information with the Copyright
Office pursuant to 17 U.S.C. 1401(f)(5)(B).
(b) Definitions. For purposes of this section:
(1) Unless otherwise specified, the terms used have the meanings
set forth in 17 U.S.C. 1401.
(2) A pre-1972 sound recording is a sound recording fixed before
February 15, 1972.
(3) A transmitting entity is an entity that, as of October 11,
2018, publicly performs pre-1972 sound recordings by means of digital
audio transmission.
(c) Form and submission. A transmitting entity seeking to comply
with 17 U.S.C. 1401(f)(5)(B) must submit contact information using an
appropriate form specified by the Copyright Office on its website and
following the instructions for completion and submission provided on
the Office's website or the form itself. The Office may reject any
submission that fails to comply with these requirements. No notice or
amended notice received after April 9, 2019 will be accepted by the
Office.
(d) Content. A notice submitted under paragraph (c) of this section
shall contain the following, in addition to any other information
required on the Office's form or website:
(1) The full legal name, email address, and physical street address
of the transmitting entity to which rights owners should send
notifications of claimed violations of 17 U.S.C. 1401(a). A post office
box may not be substituted for the street address of a transmitting
entity. Related or affiliated transmitting entities that are separate
legal entities (e.g., corporate parents and subsidiaries) are
considered separate transmitting entities, and each must file its own
separate notice of contact information.
(2) The website(s) and/or application(s) through which the
transmitting entity publicly performs pre-1972 sound recordings by
means of digital audio transmission.
(3) A certification that the transmitting entity was publicly
performing pre-1972 sound recordings by means of digital audio
transmission as of October 11, 2018.
(4) A certification that the individual submitting the notice has
appropriate authority to submit the notice and that all information
submitted to the Office is true, accurate, and complete to the best of
the individual's knowledge, information, and belief, and is made in
good faith.
(5) The transmitting entity may opt to include alternate names for
which the transmitting entity seeks application of 17 U.S.C.
1401(f)(5)(B)(iii), such as names that the public would be likely to
use to search for the transmitting entity in the Copyright Office's
online directory of transmitting entities publicly performing pre-1972
sound recordings by means of digital audio transmission, including
names under which the transmitting entity is doing business and other
commonly used names. Separate legal entities are not considered
alternate names.
(e) Fee. The filing fee to submit a notice of contact information
pursuant to this section is prescribed in Sec. 201.3(c).
Dated: October 11, 2018.
Karyn A. Temple,
Acting Register of Copyrights and Director of the U.S. Copyright
Office.
Approved by:
Carla D. Hayden,
Librarian of Congress.
[FR Doc. 2018-22518 Filed 10-15-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410-30-P