Streamlining the Administration of DART Royalty Accounts and Electronic Royalty Payment Processes, 32068-32069 [2018-14543]
Download as PDF
32068
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 83, No. 133
Wednesday, July 11, 2018
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Copyright Office
37 CFR Part 201
[Docket No. 2018–6]
Streamlining the Administration of
DART Royalty Accounts and Electronic
Royalty Payment Processes
U.S. Copyright Office, Library
of Congress.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The Copyright Office is
proposing to establish a regulation
regarding its procedures for closing out
royalty payments accounts under
section 1005, and updating its
regulations governing online payment
procedures for cable, satellite, and
digital audio recording technology
(‘‘DART’’) statements of account to no
longer require that payments be made in
a single lump sum. These amendments
are intended to improve the efficiency
of the Copyright Office’s Licensing
Division operations.
DATES: Written comments must be
received no later than 11:59 p.m.
Eastern Time on August 10, 2018.
ADDRESSES: For reasons of government
efficiency, the Copyright Office is using
the regulations.gov system for the
submission and posting of public
comments in this proceeding. All
comments are therefore to be submitted
electronically through regulations.gov.
Specific instructions for submitting
comments are available on the
Copyright Office website at https://
www.copyright.gov/rulemaking/
dartfunds. If electronic submission of
comments is not feasible due to lack of
access to a computer and/or the
internet, please contact the Office using
the contact information below for
special instructions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Regan A. Smith, General Counsel and
Associate Register of Copyrights, by
email at regans@copyright.gov, or Jalyce
Mangum, Attorney-Advisor, by email at
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:54 Jul 10, 2018
Jkt 244001
jmang@copyright.gov. Each can be
contacted by telephone by calling (202)
707–8350.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. The Audio Home Recording Act of
1992 and DART Royalty Funds
The Audio Home Recording Act of
1992 (AHRA) 1 amended title 17 to
‘‘provide a legal and administrative
framework within which digital audio
recording technology may be made
available to consumers,’’ 2 including to
implement a royalty payment system
regarding the importation, manufacture,
and distribution of digital audio
recording devices or media. Digital
audio recording devices are defined as
‘‘any machine or device of a type
commonly distributed to individuals for
use by individuals . . . that is capable
of[] making a digital audio copied
recording for private use.’’ 3 Congress
intended ‘‘importers and
manufacturers’’ to ‘‘bear the cost of
royalty fees,’’ which would then be
distributed to owners of the rights to
musical works and sound recordings.4
The AHRA also requires digital audio
recording devices to incorporate
copying controls to prevent piracy of
digital audio recordings.5
Manufacturers, importers, and
distributors of devices with proper
copying controls and who pay royalties
are not liable for copyright infringement
to the extent their products are used to
make copies of sound recordings.6
Congress delegated to the Copyright
Office and the Copyright Royalty
Tribunal (‘‘CRT’’)—a predecessor to the
system administered by the Copyright
Royalty Judges (‘‘CRJs’’)—authority to
administer the royalty system under
chapter 10.7 Under section 1003, the
importer or manufacturer of a digital
audio recording device or media must
file a notice with the Register of
Copyrights, as well as quarterly and
Public Law 102–563, 106 Stat. 4237 (1992).
Rep. No. 102–873(I), at 9 (1992).
3 17 U.S.C. 1001(3).
4 S. Rep. No. 102–294, at 39 (1992); see also 17
U.S.C. 1006(a)(1).
5 17 U.S.C. 1002(a).
6 See Alliance of Artists and Recording Cos. v.
Gen. Motors Co., 162 F. Supp. 3d 8, 10 (D.D.C.
2016).
7 See 17 U.S.C. 1003; see also S. Rep. No. 102–
294, at 39 (‘‘Administration of the royalty system
is the dual responsibility of the Copyright Office
and the CRT’’).
PO 00000
1 See
2 H.R.
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
annual statements of account with
respect to distribution, accompanied by
royalty payments.8 The Register receives
all royalty payments and, after
deducting the reasonable costs incurred
for administering this license, deposits
the balance with the Treasury of the
United States.9 These royalty payments
are divided between a sound recording
fund and a musical works fund, which
are in turn subdivided into various
subfunds, referred to collectively as the
DART subfunds.10 The royalty
payments attributed to these subfunds
are allocated to copyright owners
pursuant to distribution orders issued in
proceedings before the CRJs, as
described in section 1007 and in various
provisions of chapter 8 of title 17. The
Licensing Division of the Copyright
Office administers the DART subfunds
and distributes them pursuant to the
CRJs’ distribution orders.11
After the CRJs have issued a final
distribution order with respect to a
DART subfund, and the Licensing
Division has distributed the royalty
funds pursuant to that order, small
royalty balances can still be attributed to
these subfunds unless they have been
formally closed out by the Copyright
Office. These attributions can occur as
a result of subsequent deposits made by
payees, or, more often, in the course of
routine review and adjustments made in
the years following each appropriation,
for example, when anticipated contract
expenditures or other overhead
expenses come in slightly under budget.
Maintaining these small amounts in
separate funds creates administrative
expenses for the Licensing Division, and
the transaction costs associated with
distributing such small amounts of
money can exceed the amount of money
remaining in these accounts. Under
section 1005, the Copyright Office may,
‘‘in the Register’s discretion,’’ close out
the royalty payments account for a
calendar year four years after the close
of that year, and attribute ‘‘any funds
remaining in [the] account and any
subsequent deposits that would
otherwise be attributable to that
8 17
U.S.C. 1003(b), (c)(1), (c)(3).
at 1005.
10 Id. at 1006(b).
11 See, e.g., Order Granting Claimants’ Request for
Partial Distribution of 2005 Through 2008 DART
Music Funds Royalties, Docket No. 2010–8 CRB DD
2005–2008 (MW), available at https://www.crb.gov/
orders/2011/04411-order-granting-claimantspartial-distribution.pdf (last visited May 16, 2018).
9 Id.
E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM
11JYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 11, 2018 / Proposed Rules
daltland on DSKBBV9HB2PROD with PROPOSALS
calendar year as attributable to the
succeeding calendar year.’’ 12 In
practice, the Register has not previously
established a procedure to exercise this
discretion. The Copyright Office now
proposes to close out funds or subfunds
at any time four years after the close of
the calendar year for a given fund, if
that fund is subject to a final
distribution order. In accordance with
section 1005, the Register will treat any
funds remaining in such account or
subsequent deposits as attributable to
the closest succeeding calendar year.
The Office proposes to codify this
practice in its proposed rule, and seeks
comment on this proposal.
noticed in December 2017, that
proposes to address a wider and more
complex set of issues related to
statement of account reporting practices,
particularly the section 111 license for
cable systems.17 The Office has
extended the public comment period for
that December 2017 NPRM to October 4,
2018.18 Meanwhile, while the change
removing the requirement that royalty
fees must be paid in ‘‘a single’’ payment
is intended to be technical, the Office
solicits public comment on this discrete
issue as part of this current rulemaking.
B. Payment of Royalty Fees by
Electronic Funds Transfer
The Licensing Division administers
various statutory licensing schemes,
including those requiring the
submission of statements of account by
cable systems, satellite carriers, and
manufacturers or importers of digital
audio recording devices and media.13
Pursuant to its statutory authority, the
Copyright Office has set out the
requirements for payment of royalty fees
under each of these statutory licenses by
regulation.14 One such requirement for
all of these statutory licenses is that
‘‘[a]ll royalty fees shall be paid by a
single electronic funds transfer.’’ 15 This
language became effective in 2006, as
part of the final rule requiring remitters
to pay royalty payments by electronic
funds transfer (‘‘EFT’’).16
In practice, however, the Office has
found that the requirement that
remitters make royalty payments for
multiple statements of account in a
single, lump sum payment is
unnecessarily restrictive and has
hampered ongoing modernization
efforts. Accordingly, the Office proposes
to remove the requirement that filers
submit multiple SOAs in a single EFT
payment for the relevant statutory
licenses, specifically, by amending 37
CFR 201.11(f)(1), 201.17(k)(1), and
201.28(h)(1) to remove the requirement
that royalty fees must be paid in ‘‘a
single’’ payment. The current regulatory
requirement that funds be submitted
through EFT will remain in place.
Because the Office seeks to implement
this reform expeditiously for reasons of
administrative efficiency, it is
separating this minor proposed change
from a larger ongoing rulemaking,
Proposed Regulations
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Copyright Office proposes
amending 37 CFR part 201 as follows:
12 17
U.S.C. 1005.
13 See 17 U.S.C. 111(d)(1), 119(b)(1), 122(a)(5),
1003(c).
14 37 CFR 201.11(f)(1), 201.17(k)(1), 201.28(h)(1).
15 Id.
16 Electronic Payment of Royalties, 71 FR 45739
(Aug. 10, 2006).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:54 Jul 10, 2018
Jkt 244001
List of Subjects in 37 CFR Part 201
Copyright, General provisions.
PART 201—GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. The authority citation for part 201
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 702.
§ 201.11
[Amended]
2. Amend § 201.11 by removing ‘‘a
single’’ from paragraph (f)(1).
■
§ 201.17
[Amended]
3. Amend § 201.17 by removing ‘‘a
single’’ from paragraph (k)(1)
introductory text.
■
§ 201.28
[Amended]
4. Amend § 201.28 by removing ‘‘a
single’’ from paragraph (h)(1)
introductory text.
■ 5. Add § 201.31 to read as follows:
■
§ 201.31 Procedures for closing out
royalty payments accounts in accordance
with the Audio Home Recording Act.
(a) General. This section prescribes
rules pertaining to the close out of
royalty payments accounts in
accordance with 17 U.S.C. 1005.
(b) In the Register’s discretion, four
years after the close of any calendar
year, the Register of Copyrights may
close out the royalty payments account
for that calendar year, including any
sub-accounts, that are subject to a final
distribution order under which royalty
payments have been disbursed.
Following closure of an account, the
Register will treat any funds remaining
in that account, or subsequent deposits
that would otherwise be attributable to
that calendar year, as attributable to the
succeeding calendar year.
17 Statutory Cable, Satellite, and DART License
Reporting Practices, 82 FR 56926, 56935–36 (Dec.
1, 2017).
18 Statutory Cable, Satellite, and DART License
Reporting Practices, 83 FR 26229 (Jun. 6, 2018).
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
32069
Dated: July 2, 2018.
Regan A. Smith,
General Counsel and Associate Register of
Copyrights.
[FR Doc. 2018–14543 Filed 7–10–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410–30–P
POSTAL REGULATORY COMMISSION
39 CFR Part 3050
[Docket No. RM2018–10; Order No. 4696]
Periodic Reporting
Postal Regulatory Commission.
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
ACTION:
The Commission is
acknowledging a recent filing requesting
the Commission initiate an informal
rulemaking proceeding to consider
changes to an analytical method for use
in periodic reporting (Proposal Seven).
This document informs the public of the
filing, invites public comment, and
takes other administrative steps.
DATES: Comments are due: September 5,
2018.
ADDRESSES: Submit comments
electronically via the Commission’s
Filing Online system at https://
www.prc.gov. Those who cannot submit
comments electronically should contact
the person identified in the FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT section by
telephone for advice on filing
alternatives.
SUMMARY:
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
David A. Trissell, General Counsel, at
202–789–6820.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Table of Contents
I. Introduction
II. Proposal Seven
III. Notice and Comment
IV. Ordering Paragraphs
I. Introduction
On June 29, 2018, the Postal Service
filed a petition pursuant to 39 CFR
3050.11 requesting that the Commission
initiate a rulemaking proceeding to
consider changes to analytical
principles relating to periodic reports.1
The Petition identifies the proposed
analytical changes filed in this docket as
Proposal Seven.
II. Proposal Seven
Background. The Proposal Seven
objective is to ‘‘reorganize Cost Segment
3 and certain mail processing cost pools
1 Petition of the United States Postal Service for
the Initiation of a Proceeding to Consider Proposed
Changes in Analytical Principles (Proposal Seven),
June 29, 2018 (Petition).
E:\FR\FM\11JYP1.SGM
11JYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 133 (Wednesday, July 11, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 32068-32069]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-14543]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 133 / Wednesday, July 11, 2018 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 32068]]
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Copyright Office
37 CFR Part 201
[Docket No. 2018-6]
Streamlining the Administration of DART Royalty Accounts and
Electronic Royalty Payment Processes
AGENCY: U.S. Copyright Office, Library of Congress.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The Copyright Office is proposing to establish a regulation
regarding its procedures for closing out royalty payments accounts
under section 1005, and updating its regulations governing online
payment procedures for cable, satellite, and digital audio recording
technology (``DART'') statements of account to no longer require that
payments be made in a single lump sum. These amendments are intended to
improve the efficiency of the Copyright Office's Licensing Division
operations.
DATES: Written comments must be received no later than 11:59 p.m.
Eastern Time on August 10, 2018.
ADDRESSES: For reasons of government efficiency, the Copyright Office
is using the regulations.gov system for the submission and posting of
public comments in this proceeding. All comments are therefore to be
submitted electronically through regulations.gov. Specific instructions
for submitting comments are available on the Copyright Office website
at https://www.copyright.gov/rulemaking/dartfunds. If electronic
submission of comments is not feasible due to lack of access to a
computer and/or the internet, please contact the Office using the
contact information below for special instructions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Regan A. Smith, General Counsel and
Associate Register of Copyrights, by email at [email protected], or
Jalyce Mangum, Attorney-Advisor, by email at [email protected]. Each
can be contacted by telephone by calling (202) 707-8350.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
A. The Audio Home Recording Act of 1992 and DART Royalty Funds
The Audio Home Recording Act of 1992 (AHRA) \1\ amended title 17 to
``provide a legal and administrative framework within which digital
audio recording technology may be made available to consumers,'' \2\
including to implement a royalty payment system regarding the
importation, manufacture, and distribution of digital audio recording
devices or media. Digital audio recording devices are defined as ``any
machine or device of a type commonly distributed to individuals for use
by individuals . . . that is capable of[] making a digital audio copied
recording for private use.'' \3\ Congress intended ``importers and
manufacturers'' to ``bear the cost of royalty fees,'' which would then
be distributed to owners of the rights to musical works and sound
recordings.\4\ The AHRA also requires digital audio recording devices
to incorporate copying controls to prevent piracy of digital audio
recordings.\5\ Manufacturers, importers, and distributors of devices
with proper copying controls and who pay royalties are not liable for
copyright infringement to the extent their products are used to make
copies of sound recordings.\6\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See Public Law 102-563, 106 Stat. 4237 (1992).
\2\ H.R. Rep. No. 102-873(I), at 9 (1992).
\3\ 17 U.S.C. 1001(3).
\4\ S. Rep. No. 102-294, at 39 (1992); see also 17 U.S.C.
1006(a)(1).
\5\ 17 U.S.C. 1002(a).
\6\ See Alliance of Artists and Recording Cos. v. Gen. Motors
Co., 162 F. Supp. 3d 8, 10 (D.D.C. 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Congress delegated to the Copyright Office and the Copyright
Royalty Tribunal (``CRT'')--a predecessor to the system administered by
the Copyright Royalty Judges (``CRJs'')--authority to administer the
royalty system under chapter 10.\7\ Under section 1003, the importer or
manufacturer of a digital audio recording device or media must file a
notice with the Register of Copyrights, as well as quarterly and annual
statements of account with respect to distribution, accompanied by
royalty payments.\8\ The Register receives all royalty payments and,
after deducting the reasonable costs incurred for administering this
license, deposits the balance with the Treasury of the United
States.\9\ These royalty payments are divided between a sound recording
fund and a musical works fund, which are in turn subdivided into
various subfunds, referred to collectively as the DART subfunds.\10\
The royalty payments attributed to these subfunds are allocated to
copyright owners pursuant to distribution orders issued in proceedings
before the CRJs, as described in section 1007 and in various provisions
of chapter 8 of title 17. The Licensing Division of the Copyright
Office administers the DART subfunds and distributes them pursuant to
the CRJs' distribution orders.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ See 17 U.S.C. 1003; see also S. Rep. No. 102-294, at 39
(``Administration of the royalty system is the dual responsibility
of the Copyright Office and the CRT'').
\8\ 17 U.S.C. 1003(b), (c)(1), (c)(3).
\9\ Id. at 1005.
\10\ Id. at 1006(b).
\11\ See, e.g., Order Granting Claimants' Request for Partial
Distribution of 2005 Through 2008 DART Music Funds Royalties, Docket
No. 2010-8 CRB DD 2005-2008 (MW), available at https://www.crb.gov/orders/2011/04411-order-granting-claimants-partial-distribution.pdf
(last visited May 16, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
After the CRJs have issued a final distribution order with respect
to a DART subfund, and the Licensing Division has distributed the
royalty funds pursuant to that order, small royalty balances can still
be attributed to these subfunds unless they have been formally closed
out by the Copyright Office. These attributions can occur as a result
of subsequent deposits made by payees, or, more often, in the course of
routine review and adjustments made in the years following each
appropriation, for example, when anticipated contract expenditures or
other overhead expenses come in slightly under budget.
Maintaining these small amounts in separate funds creates
administrative expenses for the Licensing Division, and the transaction
costs associated with distributing such small amounts of money can
exceed the amount of money remaining in these accounts. Under section
1005, the Copyright Office may, ``in the Register's discretion,'' close
out the royalty payments account for a calendar year four years after
the close of that year, and attribute ``any funds remaining in [the]
account and any subsequent deposits that would otherwise be
attributable to that
[[Page 32069]]
calendar year as attributable to the succeeding calendar year.'' \12\
In practice, the Register has not previously established a procedure to
exercise this discretion. The Copyright Office now proposes to close
out funds or subfunds at any time four years after the close of the
calendar year for a given fund, if that fund is subject to a final
distribution order. In accordance with section 1005, the Register will
treat any funds remaining in such account or subsequent deposits as
attributable to the closest succeeding calendar year. The Office
proposes to codify this practice in its proposed rule, and seeks
comment on this proposal.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ 17 U.S.C. 1005.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Payment of Royalty Fees by Electronic Funds Transfer
The Licensing Division administers various statutory licensing
schemes, including those requiring the submission of statements of
account by cable systems, satellite carriers, and manufacturers or
importers of digital audio recording devices and media.\13\ Pursuant to
its statutory authority, the Copyright Office has set out the
requirements for payment of royalty fees under each of these statutory
licenses by regulation.\14\ One such requirement for all of these
statutory licenses is that ``[a]ll royalty fees shall be paid by a
single electronic funds transfer.'' \15\ This language became effective
in 2006, as part of the final rule requiring remitters to pay royalty
payments by electronic funds transfer (``EFT'').\16\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\13\ See 17 U.S.C. 111(d)(1), 119(b)(1), 122(a)(5), 1003(c).
\14\ 37 CFR 201.11(f)(1), 201.17(k)(1), 201.28(h)(1).
\15\ Id.
\16\ Electronic Payment of Royalties, 71 FR 45739 (Aug. 10,
2006).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In practice, however, the Office has found that the requirement
that remitters make royalty payments for multiple statements of account
in a single, lump sum payment is unnecessarily restrictive and has
hampered ongoing modernization efforts. Accordingly, the Office
proposes to remove the requirement that filers submit multiple SOAs in
a single EFT payment for the relevant statutory licenses, specifically,
by amending 37 CFR 201.11(f)(1), 201.17(k)(1), and 201.28(h)(1) to
remove the requirement that royalty fees must be paid in ``a single''
payment. The current regulatory requirement that funds be submitted
through EFT will remain in place.
Because the Office seeks to implement this reform expeditiously for
reasons of administrative efficiency, it is separating this minor
proposed change from a larger ongoing rulemaking, noticed in December
2017, that proposes to address a wider and more complex set of issues
related to statement of account reporting practices, particularly the
section 111 license for cable systems.\17\ The Office has extended the
public comment period for that December 2017 NPRM to October 4,
2018.\18\ Meanwhile, while the change removing the requirement that
royalty fees must be paid in ``a single'' payment is intended to be
technical, the Office solicits public comment on this discrete issue as
part of this current rulemaking.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ Statutory Cable, Satellite, and DART License Reporting
Practices, 82 FR 56926, 56935-36 (Dec. 1, 2017).
\18\ Statutory Cable, Satellite, and DART License Reporting
Practices, 83 FR 26229 (Jun. 6, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
List of Subjects in 37 CFR Part 201
Copyright, General provisions.
Proposed Regulations
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Copyright Office
proposes amending 37 CFR part 201 as follows:
PART 201--GENERAL PROVISIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 201 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 702.
Sec. 201.11 [Amended]
0
2. Amend Sec. 201.11 by removing ``a single'' from paragraph (f)(1).
Sec. 201.17 [Amended]
0
3. Amend Sec. 201.17 by removing ``a single'' from paragraph (k)(1)
introductory text.
Sec. 201.28 [Amended]
0
4. Amend Sec. 201.28 by removing ``a single'' from paragraph (h)(1)
introductory text.
0
5. Add Sec. 201.31 to read as follows:
Sec. 201.31 Procedures for closing out royalty payments accounts in
accordance with the Audio Home Recording Act.
(a) General. This section prescribes rules pertaining to the close
out of royalty payments accounts in accordance with 17 U.S.C. 1005.
(b) In the Register's discretion, four years after the close of any
calendar year, the Register of Copyrights may close out the royalty
payments account for that calendar year, including any sub-accounts,
that are subject to a final distribution order under which royalty
payments have been disbursed. Following closure of an account, the
Register will treat any funds remaining in that account, or subsequent
deposits that would otherwise be attributable to that calendar year, as
attributable to the succeeding calendar year.
Dated: July 2, 2018.
Regan A. Smith,
General Counsel and Associate Register of Copyrights.
[FR Doc. 2018-14543 Filed 7-10-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410-30-P