Group Registration of Newsletters, 22902-22907 [2018-10420]
Download as PDF
22902
§ 202.20
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 96 / Thursday, May 17, 2018 / Proposed Rules
[Amended]
8. Amend § 202.20 by removing and
reserving paragraph (c)(2)(xvii).
■
Appendix B to Part 202 [Amended]
9. In Appendix B to Part 202, remove
the sentence ‘‘(For works first published
only in a country other than the United
States, the law requires the deposit of
the best edition as first published.)’’ and
replace with ‘‘(For works first published
only in a country other than the United
States, the law requires the deposit of
the work as first published.)’’
■
Dated: May 10, 2018.
Sarang Vijay Damle,
General Counsel and Associate Register of
Copyrights.
[FR Doc. 2018–10422 Filed 5–16–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410–30–P
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Copyright Office
37 CFR Parts 201, 202
[Docket No. 2018–3]
Group Registration of Newsletters
U.S. Copyright Office, Library
of Congress.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Copyright Office is
proposing to update its regulation
governing the group registration option
for newsletters, which are defined in
part as a class of serials that are
published at least two days each week.
The proposed rule would make a
number of changes to reflect current
Office practices, promote efficiency of
the registration process, and encourage
broader participation in the registration
system by reducing the burden on
applicants. Specifically, the proposed
rule would require applicants to file an
online application, rather than a paper
application, and upload a complete
digital copy of each issue through the
electronic registration system instead of
submitting them in physical form. The
proposed rule would amend the
definition of ‘‘newsletter,’’ and
eliminate the requirement that each
issue must be a work made for hire and
the requirement that the applicants
submit their claims within a certain
period of time. In addition, the
proposed rule would remove the
requirement that the claimant provide
the Library with complimentary
subscriptions to or microfilm of the
newsletter as a condition for using the
group registration option. Under the
proposed rule, however, newsletter
publishers would remain subject to the
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 May 16, 2018
Jkt 244001
mandatory deposit requirement.
Specifically, if the newsletter is
published in the United States in a
physical format, the publisher must
provide the Library with two
complimentary subscriptions to the
newsletter, unless it is informed that the
newsletter is not needed for the
Library’s collections. Newsletters
published only in electronic form would
continue to be subject to the general,
existing on-demand mandatory deposit
regime for electronic serials. The Office
invites public comment on these
proposed changes.
DATES: Comments must be made in
writing and must be received in the U.S.
Copyright Office no later than June 18,
2018.
ADDRESSES: For reasons of government
efficiency, the Copyright Office is using
the regulations.gov system for the
submission and posting of public
comments in this proceeding. All
comments are therefore to be submitted
electronically through regulations.gov.
Specific instructions for submitting
comments are available on the
Copyright Office website at https://
www.copyright.gov/rulemaking/groupnewsletters/. If electronic submission of
comments is not feasible due to lack of
access to a computer and/or the
internet, please contact the Office using
the contact information below for
special instructions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert J. Kasunic, Associate Register of
Copyrights and Director of Registration
Policy and Practice, or Erik Bertin,
Deputy Director of Registration Policy
and Practice, by telephone at 202–707–
8040, or by email at rkas@loc.gov or
ebertin@loc.gov; or Cindy Paige
Abramson, Assistant General Counsel,
by telephone at 202–707–0676, or by
email at ciab@loc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
When Congress enacted the Copyright
Act of 1976 (the ‘‘Act’’), it authorized
the Register of Copyrights (the
‘‘Register’’) to specify by regulation the
administrative classes of works for the
purpose of seeking a registration and the
nature of the deposits required for each
such class. See 17 U.S.C. 408(c). In
addition, Congress granted the Register
the discretion to allow groups of related
works to be registered with one
application and one filing fee, a
procedure known as ‘‘group
registration.’’ See 17 U.S.C. 408(c)(1).
Congress recognized that requiring
applicants to submit separate
applications for certain types of works
may be so burdensome and expensive
PO 00000
Frm 00020
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
that authors and copyright owners may
forgo registration altogether, since
copyright registration is not a
prerequisite to copyright protection.
H.R. Rep. No. 94–1476, at 154 (1976);
reprinted in 1976 U.S.C.C.A.N. 5659,
5770; S. Rep. No. 94–473, at 136 (1975).
Pursuant to the authority granted by
Congress, the Register has issued
regulations permitting the U.S.
Copyright Office (the ‘‘Office’’) to issue
a group registration for limited
categories of works, provided that
certain conditions have been met. See
generally 37 CFR 202.3(b)(5), (6), (9),
202.4.
II. The Existing Group Registration
Option for Newsletters
In 1995, the Office promulgated a rule
offering a group registration option for
newsletter publishers, concluding that it
would further Congress’s desire to
promote registration of works that may
be too burdensome and expensive to be
registered separately.1 Under that rule, a
‘‘newsletter’’ is defined as a ‘‘a serial
published and distributed by mail or
electronic media (online or
telefacsimile), or in any medium,’’ with
publication occurring ‘‘at least two days
each week’’ and ‘‘contain[ing] news or
information of interest chiefly to a
special group (for example, trade and
professional associations, corporate inhouse groups, schools, colleges, or
churches).’’ 37 CFR 202.3(b)(9)(i). In
contrast, the option for group
registration of serials is limited to lessfrequently published serials—i.e., those
published at intervals of one week or
longer. Id. § 202.3(b)(6)(i).
The current group registration option
for newsletters has a number of
requirements. Specifically, the applicant
must complete and submit a paper
application using Form G/DN, include
at least two newsletter issues in each
group, and ‘‘designate the first and last
day that [the] issues in the group were
published.’’ 37 CFR 202.3(b)(9),
(b)(9)(viii). In addition, the newsletter
issues must be ‘‘essentially all-new
collective works or all-new issues that
have not been published before,’’ ‘‘bear
issue dates within a single calendar
month under the same continuing title,’’
be works made for hire, and have the
1 See 60 FR 15874 (Mar. 28, 1995). Before that
rule, the Office had offered group registration
options for serials and newspapers, but newsletters
could not be registered under those options because
they did not meet the relevant requirements, most
notably the requirements related to frequency of
publication. 57 FR 39615 (Sept. 1, 1992); 55 FR
50556 (Dec. 7, 1990). The Office recently issued a
final rule updating the procedures for group
registration for newspapers, to similarly streamline
the registration process, and intends to do the same
for serials. See 83 FR 4144 (Jan. 30, 2018).
E:\FR\FM\17MYP1.SGM
17MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 96 / Thursday, May 17, 2018 / Proposed Rules
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS
same person or organization as the
author and claimant for all issues in the
group. Id. § 202.3(b)(9)(ii)–(v). Form G/
DN also indicates that newsletters are
customarily sold by subscription as
opposed to on newsstands, although
this requirement is not mentioned in the
regulation itself. See 60 FR at 15875.
To satisfy the registration deposit
requirements for this group option, the
applicant must submit one complete
copy of each issue that is included in
the group. 37 CFR 202.3(b)(9)(vi)(A).
The current regulation also states that if
the newsletter is one that has been
selected for the Library’s collections, the
claimant is required to provide either
‘‘as many as two complimentary
subscriptions of the newsletter in the
edition most suitable to the Library’s
needs,’’ or ‘‘a single positive, 35 mm
silver halide microfilm meeting the
Library’s best edition criteria that
includes all issues published as final
editions in the designated calendar
month,’’ whichever the Library prefers.
Id. § 202.3(b)(9)(vi)(B). This provision
has been in effect for more than fifteen
years, but relatively few newsletters
have been selected for the Library’s
collection.
Finally, the current regulation states
that registration must be ‘‘sought within
three months after the publication date
of the last issue included in the group.’’
Id. § 202.3(b)(9)(vii). The deadline is
intended to ensure that the Library
receives these types of works in a timely
manner. 64 FR 19522, 29523 (Jun. 1,
1999). If the claimant is unable to
provide subscription copies or
microfilm, or is unable to do so within
three months after publication, the
regulation states that each issue may be
registered on an individual basis by
submitting a paper application on Form
SE or Short Form SE. 37 CFR
202.3(b)(9)(vi)(C).
III. The Current Rule Governing
Mandatory Deposit of Newsletters
Section 407 of the Copyright Act
states that if a work is published in the
United States, the owner of copyright or
the owner of the exclusive right of
publication must affirmatively deposit
two copies of the ‘‘best edition’’ of that
work with the Library within three
months after publication. 17 U.S.C.
407(a)–(b). This is known as the
‘‘mandatory deposit’’ requirement. As a
general rule, publishers may satisfy this
requirement by registering their works
with the Office, or by sending copies to
the Copyright Office’s Copyright
Acquisitions Division without seeking a
registration. If a publisher fails to
comply with the mandatory deposit
requirement, the Office may issue a
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 May 16, 2018
Jkt 244001
written demand for those works, and if
the required copies are not received
within three months thereafter, the
copyright owner or owner of the
exclusive right of publication in that
work may be subject to fines or other
monetary liability. Id. 407(d). The Office
has the authority to establish regulations
governing mandatory deposit, including
regulations to exempt any categories of
material from these requirements. See
id. 407(c), 702.
Newsletters published in a physical
format (including works published both
in physical and electronic formats) are
subject to these affirmative mandatory
deposit requirements. 37 CFR
202.19(c)(5). Electronic-only newsletters
are subject to a separate mandatory
deposit regime. Specifically, in 2010,
the Office adopted an interim rule that
established a different process for serials
published solely in electronic form.
(Newsletters, as a type of serial, are
subject to these rules.) That interim rule
established a general exemption for
most ‘‘[e]lectronic works published in
the United States and available only
online,’’ except for serials published
solely in electronic formats (i.e.,
‘‘online-only’’ serials). Id. For onlineonly serials, there is no affirmative
obligation to deposit works with the
Copyright Office. Instead, if the Library
desires a particular serial title for its
collections, the Office will issue a
written demand requiring the publisher
to deposit copies of that serial. Id.
202.24.
IV. The Proposed Rule
The existing regulations governing
group registration of newsletters require
updating, both to better account for
current practice, and to allow the Office
to streamline and modernize its
registration procedures. Accordingly,
the Office is proposing to amend the
regulation governing the group option
for newsletters to modify the eligibility
requirements for this group option in
several respects.
To summarize, the proposed rule
would do the following things:
(1) The rule would clarify and expand
the category of works eligible for the
group registration option, including by
eliminating the work-for-hire
requirement, by making clear that
newsletters need not be collective
works, and by eliminating the threemonth deadline for filing the
registration application.
(2) The rule would memorialize the
Office’s longstanding position regarding
the scope of a registration for a group of
newsletter issues—i.e., a registration for
a group of newsletter issues covers each
issue in the group, and if each issue
PO 00000
Frm 00021
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
22903
constitutes a collective work, the
articles, photographs, illustrations, or
other contributions appearing within
those issues—if they are fully owned by
the copyright claimant and if they were
first published in those issues.
(3) The rule would require applicants
to register their newsletters through the
Office’s electronic registration system,
and would discontinue the existing
paper application.
(4) The rule would require applicants
to upload their newsletters in digital
form through the electronic registration
system; the Office would no longer
accept physical copies, such as a
photocopy of each issue in the group, or
digital copies that have been saved onto
a flash drive, disc, or other physical
storage medium that is delivered to the
Office.
(5) Newsletter publishers would no
longer be required to provide either
subscriptions or microfilm copies for
the Library’s collections as a condition
for using the group registration option.
But the rule would also make clear that
electronic deposits submitted to the
Office through the registration system
would not satisfy the mandatory deposit
requirements in section 407, and would
amend the mandatory deposit
regulations to provide guidance on
fulfilling those requirements.
Specifically, if a newsletter is published
in the United States in a physical
format, the publisher must provide the
Library with two complimentary
subscriptions to the newsletter, unless it
is informed that the newsletter is not
needed for the Library’s collections.
Newsletters published only in electronic
form will continue to be subject to the
existing on-demand mandatory deposit
regime.
The next sections discuss changes
warranting more discussion.
A. Works Eligible
The proposed rule clarifies that
newsletter issues can be, but do not
have to be, collective works to qualify
for the group registration option. Thus,
for example, a newsletter that contains
a single article and a single photograph
would not be considered a collective
work, because it does not contain a
sufficient number of contributions—but
nevertheless it would still be eligible for
registration as part of the group, if the
rest of the eligibility requirements have
been met.2 In this respect, the proposed
2 See H.R. Rep. No. 94–1476, at 122 (1976)
(stating that a work does not qualify as a collective
work ‘‘where relatively few separate elements have
been brought together,’’ as in the case of ‘‘a
composition consisting of words and music, a work
E:\FR\FM\17MYP1.SGM
Continued
17MYP1
22904
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 96 / Thursday, May 17, 2018 / Proposed Rules
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS
rule differs from the corresponding
group registration options for serials and
newspapers. To register a group of
serials or newspapers, each issue in the
group must be a collective work. See 37
CFR 202.3(b)(6)(i)(C)–(E), 202.4(e)(2). By
contrast, under the proposed rule,
publishers may register a group of
newsletters whether or not each issue
satisfies the statutory definition for a
collective work.
The rule also clarifies that each
newsletter issue in the group must be
fixed and distributed as a discrete, selfcontained work.3 An applicant may
satisfy this requirement if the newsletter
as a whole is fixed in a tangible medium
of expression, and the content of each
issue does not change once it has been
distributed. For example, a publisher
that mails a newsletter to its subscribers
would satisfy this requirement, because
the newsletter is clearly fixed and
distributed in a physical format. A
publisher that emails an electronic
newsletter to its subscribers may satisfy
this requirement if each issue contains
a fixed selection of content, such as a
PDF version of a physical publication.
Similarly, a publisher that allows its
subscribers to download a newsletter
from its website may satisfy this
requirement if each issue is distributed
as a self-contained work and the content
of each issue does not change once it
has been downloaded.
The current regulation states that
newsletter publishers must submit their
claims within three months after the
publication of the most recent issue in
the group. 37 CFR 202.3(b)(9)(vii). The
proposed rule eliminates this
requirement, as it existed as a means of
encouraging publishers to provide
subscriptions or copies to the Library as
early as possible. Since the proposed
rule eliminates that requirement, the
timeliness requirement can be
eliminated as well, especially because
the Copyright Act itself already contains
a number of incentives for early
registration.
The proposed rule continues the
existing requirement that the works be
‘‘all new’’ collective works or ‘‘all new’’
issues that have not been published
before.4 In other words, the issues
published with illustrations or front matter, or three
one-act plays’’).
3 Similar language has appeared in the
Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices,
Third Edition since December 2014. See Copyright
Office, Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office
Practices sec. 1113 (3d ed. 2017) (hereinafter the
‘‘Compendium’’).
4 The current rule states that the works must be
‘‘essentially all new collective works or all new
issues.’’ 37 CFR 202.3(b)(9)(ii) (emphasis added).
The proposed rule eliminates the word
‘‘essentially,’’ as it is likely to cause confusion.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 May 16, 2018
Jkt 244001
included in the group cannot be
derivative versions of a previously
published issue or a newsletter that is
frequently modified, updated, or
adapted.
The proposed rule clarifies the scope
of the group registration option in
various respects, including by
eliminating the existing reference to
‘‘daily newsletters,’’ 37 CFR 202.3(b)(9),
which is inaccurate, and by clarifying
that a group of newsletters must
‘‘usually’’ be published at least two days
a week, to account for occasional
situations where the newsletter
suspends publication (e.g., for a
holiday).
B. Scope of Protection
The proposed rule clarifies that a
registration for a group of newsletters
covers each issue in the group, and each
issue would be registered as a separate
work. In other words, the group
registration is treated as the legal
equivalent of a separate registration for
each newsletter issue.
If the newsletters qualify and are
claimed as collective works, then those
issues would be registered as separate
collective works. As a general rule, a
registration for a collective work covers
the individual contributions contained
within that work if they are fully owned
by the copyright claimant and if they
were first published in that work.5 A
registration for a group of newsletter
issues constituting collective works is
effectively treated as a separate
collective work registration for each
issue in the group. Thus, in such cases,
the group registration also covers the
articles, photographs, illustrations, or
other contributions appearing within
those issues—if they are fully owned by
the copyright claimant at the time the
application was filed, and if they were
first published in those issues. By
contrast, if an issue constituting a
collective work contains contributions
that are not fully owned by the
copyright claimant, and/or
contributions that were previously
published, the registration will not
extend to those works. See Morris v.
Business Concepts, Inc., 259 F.3d 65, 71
5 See, e.g., Alaska Stock, LLC v. Houghton Mifflin
Harcourt Pub. Co., 747 F.3d 673, 683 (9th Cir.
2014); Morris v. Bus. Concepts, Inc., 259 F.3d 65,
68 (2d Cir. 2001); Compendium secs. 509.1, 509.2;
see also 17 U.S.C. 201(c) (‘‘Copyright in each
separate contribution to a collective work is distinct
from copyright in the collective work as a whole,
and vests initially in the author of the contribution.
In the absence of an express transfer of the
copyright or of any rights under it, the owner of
copyright in the collective work is presumed to
have acquired only the privilege of reproducing and
distributing the contribution as part of that
particular collective work . . . .’’).
PO 00000
Frm 00022
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
(2d Cir. 2001) (‘‘Unless the copyright
owner of a collective work also owns all
the rights in a constituent part, a
collective work registration will not
extend to the constituent part.’’),
abrogated on other grounds by Reed
Elsevier, Inc. v. Muchnick, 559 U.S. 154,
160 (2010).
With respect to the information
collected as part of a group registration
and examination practices, the Office
must balance the public interest in
creating a meaningful record (i.e.,
collecting information regarding each
individual contribution within a
newsletter issue) with the relative
burden on applicants wishing to
participate in the registration system.
When an applicant submits multiple
issues, it is difficult to collect granular
information concerning the individual
articles, photographs, and other
component works within each issue.
Requiring applicants to identify the
author and title of each individual
contribution would impose a significant
burden both on applicants and the
Office alike. This would discourage
registration, which in turn, would
diminish the value of the Office’s public
record. Imposing these burdens would
also be contrary to the Congressional
purpose of providing the Office with the
authority to create group registration
options: To ease the registration of
certain works.
Accordingly, the Office’s application
to register a group of newsletter issues
does not contain spaces where the
applicant can provide titles, authors, or
other identifying information for each
contribution, or identify component
works created by a third party and
transferred to the claimant by written
agreement. But the Office foresees the
future possibility of applicants
submitting metadata for the component
works appearing within each issue, and
the possibility of the Office
incorporating this information into the
registration record. If this becomes
feasible once the Office implements its
next-generation registration system, it
may require this type of information as
a condition for using this group
registration option.
If each issue appears to be a collective
work, the examiner will examine the
issue as a whole to determine if it
contains sufficient compilation
authorship to warrant registration as a
collective work. And the examiner will
review the issue to determine whether
it contains ‘‘a number of contributions’’
constituting ‘‘separate and independent
works in themselves’’ 17 U.S.C. 101
(definition of ‘‘collective work’’). When
the Office issues a group registration,
the certificate will identify the title,
E:\FR\FM\17MYP1.SGM
17MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 96 / Thursday, May 17, 2018 / Proposed Rules
author, and claimant for each newsletter
issue in the group, but it will not
identify the titles, authors, or claimants
for the individual contributions
appearing within those issues.
The scope of protection for a group
registration issued under the proposed
rule will have several consequences in
infringement actions. First, a group
registration may be used to satisfy the
statutory requirements for instituting an
infringement action involving any of the
newsletter issues that were included
within the group.6 17 U.S.C. 411(a).
Likewise, a group registration may be
used to enforce the copyright in any of
the individual contributions appearing
within issues constituting collective
works—provided that the claimant fully
owned those contributions at the time
the application for registration is
submitted, and provided that the
contributions were first published in
one of those issues.
Second, the proposed rule clarifies
that the group as a whole is not
considered a compilation, a collective
work, or a derivative work. Instead, the
group is merely an administrative
classification created solely for the
purpose of registering multiple works
with one application and one filing fee.
The chronological selection,
coordination, and arrangement of the
issues within the group is entirely
dictated by the regulatory requirements
for this option. Likewise, when a group
of newsletter issues are combined for
the purpose of facilitating registration,
those works are not ‘‘recast,
transformed, or adapted’’ in any way,
and the group as a whole is not ‘‘a work
based upon one or more preexisting
works’’ because there is no
copyrightable authorship in simply
collecting a month of issues and
arranging them in chronological order.
17 U.S.C. 101 (definition of ‘‘derivative
work’’).
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS
C. Online Registration Requirement
On December 14, 2012, the Office
made some modifications to its
electronic registration system to allow
newsletter publishers to submit their
claims with the online application.
Under the proposed rule, applicants
would be required to use the electronic
application designated for a group of
newsletter issues as a condition for
seeking a group registration. The Office
would no longer accept groups of
newsletter issues submitted for
6 Alternatively, a plaintiff may satisfy this
statutory requirement if the Office refused
registration, provided that the plaintiff serves a
copy of the complaint on the Register of Copyrights.
17 U.S.C. 411(a).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 May 16, 2018
Jkt 244001
registration on paper using Form G/DN.7
If, after the effective date of this rule,
such paper applications are received,
the Office will refuse registration. The
Office invites comment on this
proposal, including whether the Office
should eliminate the paper application
for newsletter issues, phase it out after
a specified period of time, or continue
to offer Form G/DN for applicants who
prefer to use the paper-based system.
The Office’s decision to offer a group
option is entirely discretionary, and
Congress gave the Office broad authority
to establish the requirements for these
types of claims. 17 U.S.C. 408(c)(1).
Currently, the vast majority of the
claims submitted on Form G/DN require
correspondence or other action from the
Office, which increases overall
pendency and contributes to the Office’s
backlog of pending claims. Applicants
routinely file claims that are not eligible
for this group option, fail to provide
information expressly requested on the
form, or add extraneous information
that is not requested. In each case,
however, the Office must first scan these
paper applications into the registration
system and input the relevant
information by hand before an examiner
can reject the application as having been
improperly filed. This is a cumbersome,
labor-intensive process, and if it is done
incorrectly, the information must be reentered into the system. In many cases,
the Office must contact the applicant to
request additional information or
permission to correct the application.
Addressing these issues imposes
significant burdens on the Office’s
limited resources, and has had an
adverse effect on the examination of
other types of works within the Literary
Division of the Registration Program.
Eliminating the paper application
should mitigate many of these problems.
Among other improvements, the online
application contains automated
validations that prevent applicants from
submitting applications that fail to
comply with the eligibility requirements
for this group option, such as including
7 Because the Office is proposing to eliminate
Form G/DN, and require applicants to submit their
claims through the electronic registration system,
the term G/DN will soon be obsolete. Going
forward, the Office will refer to this option as
‘‘GRNL,’’ which stands for ‘‘group newsletters.’’ In
addition, the Office recently issued a final rule that
requires applicants to file an online application in
order to correct or amplify the information set forth
in a basic registration for any work capable of being
registered through the electronic system, rather than
filing a paper application. 82 FR 27424 (June 15,
2017). This online filing requirement will apply to
supplementary registrations for groups of newsletter
issues—even if the issues were originally registered
using Form G/DN. See 37 CFR 202.6(e)(1); 81 FR
86656, 86657, n.3 (Dec. 1, 2016).
PO 00000
Frm 00023
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
22905
too many issues in the group (i.e., more
than one calendar month of issues).
For these reasons, the Office believes
that requiring applicants to submit
online applications is necessary to
improve the overall efficiency of the
group registration process. Nonetheless,
the Office invites comment on this
aspect of the proposed rule.
D. Digital Registration Deposits
As noted above, to register a group of
newsletters under the proposed rule,
applicants will be required to submit a
complete digital copy of each issue in
the group, regardless of whether the
newsletter is published in a physical or
electronic form and regardless of
whether the newsletter is published in
the United States or abroad. Requiring
applicants to upload digital copies to
the electronic system will increase the
efficiency of the group registration
process. The Office does not need
physical copies to examine a newsletter
for copyrightable authorship, or to
determine whether the applicant
satisfied the formal and legal
requirements for this group option. See
17 U.S.C. 410(a) (providing that the
Register of Copyrights must determine
whether ‘‘material deposited [for
registration] constitutes copyrightable
subject matter’’). Electronic submissions
also take less time to process, and are
easier to track and handle than physical
copies. A registration specialist can
examine a digital copy as soon as it has
been uploaded to the electronic
registration system. By contrast, when
an applicant submits an online
application and mails a physical deposit
to the Office, it may take weeks to
connect the application with the correct
deposit. In addition, each copy must be
moved multiple times during the
examination process.
Requiring digital uploads may also
provide newsletter publishers with
certain legal benefits. When the Office
registers a group of newsletters and
issues a certificate of registration, the
effective date of registration is the date
on which the Office received the
application, filing fee, and deposit in
proper form. When an applicant
uploads a digital copy of the deposit to
the electronic system, the Office
typically receives the application, filing
fee, and deposit on the same date. By
contrast, when an applicant sends
physical copies to the Office, the
deposit may arrive long after the date
that the application and filing fee were
E:\FR\FM\17MYP1.SGM
17MYP1
22906
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 96 / Thursday, May 17, 2018 / Proposed Rules
received—thereby establishing a later
effective date of registration.8
E. Mandatory Deposit
Although the proposed rule
eliminates the requirement to provide
subscriptions or microfilm as a
condition of using the group registration
option, newsletter publishers would
still generally be subject to the
mandatory deposit requirement under
section 407.
To assist publishers with complying
with these mandatory deposit
requirements, the proposed rule amends
the Office’s mandatory deposit
regulations, 37 CFR 202.19, to provide
specific rules for all serials (a definition
that includes newsletters) that are
published in the United States in a
physical format or in both a physical
and electronic format.9 Newsletter
publishers will be expected to provide
two complimentary subscriptions to
such newsletters, unless they have been
informed by CAD that the serial title is
not needed for the Library’s collections.
If subscription copies are not received
within three months after publication of
each issue, the Copyright Acquisitions
Division (‘‘CAD’’) may issue a written
demand for ongoing subscriptions to
that publication. The failure to provide
subscription copies when demanded by
the Office would subject the owner to
penalties under section 407.
No change is being made to the
mandatory deposit scheme for
electronic-only serials; such serials will
continue to be subject to the existing,
demand-based mandatory deposit
scheme.10
V. Conclusion
The proposed rule, if adopted, will
encourage broader participation in the
registration system, and increase the
efficiency of the process for both the
Office and copyright owners alike,
while providing the Library with a
means for adding newsletters to its
collections. The Office invites public
comment on all these proposed changes.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS
PART 201—GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. The authority citation for part 201
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 702.
2. Amend § 201.1 by revising
paragraph (c)(6) to read as follows:
■
§ 201.1 Communication with the U.S.
Copyright Office.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(6) Mandatory Deposit Copies.
Mandatory deposit copies of published
works submitted for the Library of
Congress under 17 U.S.C. 407 and
§ 202.19 of this chapter (including
complimentary subscriptions to serial
publications), and newspaper microfilm
copies submitted under § 202.4(e) of this
chapter, should be addressed to: Library
of Congress, U.S. Copyright Office, Attn:
407 Deposits, 101 Independence
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20559–
6600.
*
*
*
*
*
PART 202—PREREGISTRATION AND
REGISTRATION OF CLAIMS TO
COPYRIGHT
3. The authority citation for part 202
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 408(f), 702.
§ 202.3
8 The Office recognizes that some publishers may
not have a digital copy of their issues or may find
it difficult to create a digital copy for the purpose
of seeking a group registration. The Office proposes
to address these concerns on a case-by-case basis.
If an applicant is unable to upload a particular
newsletter to the electronic system, the applicant
may request special relief from the deposit
requirements under 37 CFR 202.20(d).
9 The same proposal is being made as part of the
notice of proposed rulemaking relating to group
registration of serials.
10 See 37 CFR 202.19(c)(5), 202.24(a).
Jkt 244001
[Amended]
4. Amend § 202.3 by removing and
reserving paragraph (b)(9).
■ 5. Amend § 202.4 by adding paragraph
(f) and a new sentence after the first
sentence of paragraph (n) to read as
follows.
■
Group Registration.
*
37 CFR Part 201
Copyright, General Provisions.
17:48 May 16, 2018
Proposed Regulation
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Copyright Office proposes
amending 37 CFR parts 201 and 202 as
follows:
§ 202.4
List of Subjects
VerDate Sep<11>2014
37 CFR Part 202
Copyright, Preregistration and
registration of claims to copyright.
*
*
*
*
(f) Group registration of newsletters.
Pursuant to the authority granted by 17
U.S.C. 408(c)(1), the Register of
Copyrights has determined that a group
of newsletter issues may be registered
with one application, one filing fee, the
required deposit, and the filing fee
required by § 201.3(c) of this chapter, if
the following conditions are met:
(1) Eligible works.
(A) All the issues in the group must
be newsletters. For purposes of this
section, a newsletter is a serial that is
published and distributed by mail,
PO 00000
Frm 00024
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
electronic media, or other medium,
including paper, email, or download.
Publication must usually occur at least
two days each week and the newsletter
must contain news or information that
is chiefly of interest to a special group,
such as trade and professional
associations, colleges, schools, or
churches. Newsletters are typically
distributed through subscriptions, but
are not distributed through newsstands
or other retail outlets.
(B) The group must include at least
two issues.
(C) Each issue in the group must be
an all-new issue or an all-new collective
work that has not been previously
published, and each issue must be fixed
and distributed as a discrete, selfcontained work.
(D) The author and claimant for each
issue must be the same person or
organization.
(E) All the issues in the group must
be published under the same continuing
title, they must be published within the
same calendar month and bear issue
dates within that month, and the
applicant must identify the earliest and
latest date that the issues were
published during that month.
(2) Application. The applicant must
complete and submit the online
application designated for a group of
newsletter issues. The application may
be submitted by any of the parties listed
in § 202.3(c)(1).
(3) Deposit. The applicant must
submit one complete copy of each issue
that is included in the group. The issues
must be submitted in digital form, and
each issue must be contained in a
separate electronic file. The applicant
must use the file-naming convention
and submit digital files in accordance
with instructions specified on the
Copyright Office’s website. The files
must be submitted in Portable
Document Format (PDF), they must be
assembled in an orderly form, and they
must be uploaded to the electronic
registration system as individual
electronic files (i.e., not .zip files). The
files must be viewable and searchable,
contain embedded fonts, and be free
from any access restrictions (such as
those implemented through digital
rights management) that prevent the
viewing and examination of the work.
The file size for each uploaded file must
not exceed 500 megabytes, but files may
be compressed to comply with this
requirement. Copies submitted under
this paragraph will be considered solely
for the purpose of registration under
section 408 of title 17 of the United
States Code, and will not satisfy the
mandatory deposit requirement under
E:\FR\FM\17MYP1.SGM
17MYP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 96 / Thursday, May 17, 2018 / Proposed Rules
section 407 of title 17 of the United
States Code.
*
*
*
*
*
(n) The scope of a group registration.
* * * When the Office issues a group
registration under paragraph (f) of this
section, the registration covers each
issue in the group and each issue is
registered as a separate work or a
separate collective work (as the case
may be). * * *
■ 6. Amend § 202.19 by adding
paragraph (d)(2)(x) to read as follows:
§ 202.19 Deposit of published copies or
phonorecords for the Library of Congress.
amozie on DSK3GDR082PROD with PROPOSALS
*
*
*
*
*
(d) * * *
(2) * * *
(x) In the case of serials (as defined in
§ 202.3(b)(1)(v), but excluding
newspapers) published in the United
States in a physical format, or in both
a physical and an electronic format, the
copyright owner or the owner of the
exclusive right of publication must
provide the Library of Congress with
two complimentary subscriptions to the
serial, unless the Copyright Acquisitions
Division informs the owner that the
serial is not needed for the Library’s
collections. Subscription copies must be
physically mailed to the Copyright
Office, at the address for mandatory
deposit copies specified in § 201.1(c) of
this chapter, promptly after the
publication of each issue, and the
subscription(s) must be maintained on
an ongoing basis. The owner may cancel
the subscription(s) if the serial is no
longer published by the owner, if the
serial is no longer published in the
United States in a physical format, or if
the Copyright Acquisitions Division
informs the owner that the serial is no
longer needed for the Library’s
collections. In addition, prior to
commencing the subscriptions, the
owner must send a letter to the
Copyright Acquisitions Division at the
address specified in § 201.1(b) of this
chapter confirming that the owner will
provide the requested number of
subscriptions for the Library of
Congress. The letter must include the
name of the publisher, the title of the
newsletter, the International Standard
Serial Number (‘‘ISSN’’) that has been
assigned to the newsletter (if any), and
the issue date and the numerical or
chronological designations that appear
on the first issue that will be provided
under the subscriptions.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:48 May 16, 2018
Jkt 244001
Dated: May 11, 2018.
Sarang V. Damle,
General Counsel and Associate Register of
Copyrights.
[FR Doc. 2018–10420 Filed 5–16–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410–30–P
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Copyright Royalty Board
17 CFR Part 384
[Docket No. 17–CRB–0001–BER (2019–
2023)]
Determination of Royalty Rates and
Terms for Making Ephemeral Copies of
Sound Recordings for Transmission to
Business Establishments (Business
Establishments III)
Copyright Royalty Board,
Library of Congress.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Copyright Royalty Judges
(Judges) publish for comment proposed
regulations that set rates and terms for
the making of an ephemeral recording of
a sound recording by a business
establishment service for the period
January 1, 2019, through December 31,
2023.
DATES: Comments and objections are
due no later than June 18, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
and objections, identified by docket
number 17–CRB–0001–BER (2019–
2023), by any of the following methods:
CRB’s electronic filing application:
Submit comments online in eCRB at
https://app.crb.gov/.
U.S. mail: Copyright Royalty Board,
P.O. Box 70977, Washington, DC 20024–
0977; or
Overnight service (only USPS Express
Mail is acceptable): Copyright Royalty
Board, P.O. Box 70977, Washington, DC
20024–0977; or
Commercial courier: Address package
to: Copyright Royalty Board, Library of
Congress, James Madison Memorial
Building, LM–403, 101 Independence
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20559–
6000. Deliver to: Congressional Courier
Acceptance Site, 2nd Street NE and D
Street NE, Washington, DC; or
Hand delivery: Library of Congress,
James Madison Memorial Building, LM–
401, 101 Independence Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20559–6000.
Instructions: Unless submitting
online, commenters must submit an
original, two paper copies, and an
electronic version on a CD. All
submissions must include a reference to
the CRB and this docket number. All
submissions will be posted without
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00025
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
22907
change to eCRB at https://app.crb.gov/
including any personal information
provided.
Docket: For access to the docket to
read submitted background documents
or comments, go to eCRB, the Copyright
Royalty Board’s electronic filing and
case management system, at https://
app.crb.gov/ and search for docket
number 17–CRB–0001–BER (2019–
2023).
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Anita Blaine, CRB Program Specialist,
by telephone at (202) 707–7658 or email
at crb@loc.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: In 1995,
Congress enacted the Digital
Performance in Sound Recordings Act,
Public Law 104–39, which created an
exclusive right, subject to certain
limitations, for copyright owners of
sound recordings to perform publicly
those sound recordings by means of
certain digital audio transmissions.
Among the limitations on the
performance right was the creation of a
statutory license for nonexempt,
noninteractive digital subscription
transmissions. 17 U.S.C. 114(d).
The scope of the section 114 statutory
license was expanded in 1998 upon the
passage of the Digital Millennium
Copyright Act of 1998 (DMCA), Public
Law 105–34, which allows public
performance of a sound recording when
made in accordance with the terms and
rates of the statutory license, by a
preexisting satellite digital audio radio
service or as part of an eligible
nonsubscription transmission. 17 U.S.C.
114(d).
The DMCA also created a statutory
license for the making of an ‘‘ephemeral
recording’’ of a sound recording by
certain transmitting organizations. 17
U.S.C. 112(e). This license, among other
things, allows entities that transmit
performances of sound recordings to
business establishments to make an
ephemeral recording of a sound
recording for later transmission,
pursuant to the limitations set forth in
section 114(d)(1)(C)(iv).
Chapter 8 of the Copyright Act
requires the Copyright Royalty Judges
(Judges) to conduct proceedings every
five years to determine the royalty rates
and terms for ‘‘the activities described
in section 112(e)(1) relating to the
limitation on exclusive rights specified
by section 114(d)(1)(C)(iv).’’ 17 U.S.C.
801(b)(1), 804(b)(2). Accordingly, the
Judges published a notice commencing
the current proceeding and requesting
that interested parties submit petitions
to participate. 82 FR 143 (Jan. 3, 2017).
The Judges received Petitions to
Participate from Mood Media
E:\FR\FM\17MYP1.SGM
17MYP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 96 (Thursday, May 17, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 22902-22907]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-10420]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Copyright Office
37 CFR Parts 201, 202
[Docket No. 2018-3]
Group Registration of Newsletters
AGENCY: U.S. Copyright Office, Library of Congress.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Copyright Office is proposing to update its
regulation governing the group registration option for newsletters,
which are defined in part as a class of serials that are published at
least two days each week. The proposed rule would make a number of
changes to reflect current Office practices, promote efficiency of the
registration process, and encourage broader participation in the
registration system by reducing the burden on applicants. Specifically,
the proposed rule would require applicants to file an online
application, rather than a paper application, and upload a complete
digital copy of each issue through the electronic registration system
instead of submitting them in physical form. The proposed rule would
amend the definition of ``newsletter,'' and eliminate the requirement
that each issue must be a work made for hire and the requirement that
the applicants submit their claims within a certain period of time. In
addition, the proposed rule would remove the requirement that the
claimant provide the Library with complimentary subscriptions to or
microfilm of the newsletter as a condition for using the group
registration option. Under the proposed rule, however, newsletter
publishers would remain subject to the mandatory deposit requirement.
Specifically, if the newsletter is published in the United States in a
physical format, the publisher must provide the Library with two
complimentary subscriptions to the newsletter, unless it is informed
that the newsletter is not needed for the Library's collections.
Newsletters published only in electronic form would continue to be
subject to the general, existing on-demand mandatory deposit regime for
electronic serials. The Office invites public comment on these proposed
changes.
DATES: Comments must be made in writing and must be received in the
U.S. Copyright Office no later than June 18, 2018.
ADDRESSES: For reasons of government efficiency, the Copyright Office
is using the regulations.gov system for the submission and posting of
public comments in this proceeding. All comments are therefore to be
submitted electronically through regulations.gov. Specific instructions
for submitting comments are available on the Copyright Office website
at https://www.copyright.gov/rulemaking/group-newsletters/. If
electronic submission of comments is not feasible due to lack of access
to a computer and/or the internet, please contact the Office using the
contact information below for special instructions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert J. Kasunic, Associate Register
of Copyrights and Director of Registration Policy and Practice, or Erik
Bertin, Deputy Director of Registration Policy and Practice, by
telephone at 202-707-8040, or by email at [email protected] or
[email protected]; or Cindy Paige Abramson, Assistant General Counsel, by
telephone at 202-707-0676, or by email at [email protected].
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
When Congress enacted the Copyright Act of 1976 (the ``Act''), it
authorized the Register of Copyrights (the ``Register'') to specify by
regulation the administrative classes of works for the purpose of
seeking a registration and the nature of the deposits required for each
such class. See 17 U.S.C. 408(c). In addition, Congress granted the
Register the discretion to allow groups of related works to be
registered with one application and one filing fee, a procedure known
as ``group registration.'' See 17 U.S.C. 408(c)(1). Congress recognized
that requiring applicants to submit separate applications for certain
types of works may be so burdensome and expensive that authors and
copyright owners may forgo registration altogether, since copyright
registration is not a prerequisite to copyright protection. H.R. Rep.
No. 94-1476, at 154 (1976); reprinted in 1976 U.S.C.C.A.N. 5659, 5770;
S. Rep. No. 94-473, at 136 (1975). Pursuant to the authority granted by
Congress, the Register has issued regulations permitting the U.S.
Copyright Office (the ``Office'') to issue a group registration for
limited categories of works, provided that certain conditions have been
met. See generally 37 CFR 202.3(b)(5), (6), (9), 202.4.
II. The Existing Group Registration Option for Newsletters
In 1995, the Office promulgated a rule offering a group
registration option for newsletter publishers, concluding that it would
further Congress's desire to promote registration of works that may be
too burdensome and expensive to be registered separately.\1\ Under that
rule, a ``newsletter'' is defined as a ``a serial published and
distributed by mail or electronic media (online or telefacsimile), or
in any medium,'' with publication occurring ``at least two days each
week'' and ``contain[ing] news or information of interest chiefly to a
special group (for example, trade and professional associations,
corporate in-house groups, schools, colleges, or churches).'' 37 CFR
202.3(b)(9)(i). In contrast, the option for group registration of
serials is limited to less-frequently published serials--i.e., those
published at intervals of one week or longer. Id. Sec. 202.3(b)(6)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ See 60 FR 15874 (Mar. 28, 1995). Before that rule, the
Office had offered group registration options for serials and
newspapers, but newsletters could not be registered under those
options because they did not meet the relevant requirements, most
notably the requirements related to frequency of publication. 57 FR
39615 (Sept. 1, 1992); 55 FR 50556 (Dec. 7, 1990). The Office
recently issued a final rule updating the procedures for group
registration for newspapers, to similarly streamline the
registration process, and intends to do the same for serials. See 83
FR 4144 (Jan. 30, 2018).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The current group registration option for newsletters has a number
of requirements. Specifically, the applicant must complete and submit a
paper application using Form G/DN, include at least two newsletter
issues in each group, and ``designate the first and last day that [the]
issues in the group were published.'' 37 CFR 202.3(b)(9), (b)(9)(viii).
In addition, the newsletter issues must be ``essentially all-new
collective works or all-new issues that have not been published
before,'' ``bear issue dates within a single calendar month under the
same continuing title,'' be works made for hire, and have the
[[Page 22903]]
same person or organization as the author and claimant for all issues
in the group. Id. Sec. 202.3(b)(9)(ii)-(v). Form G/DN also indicates
that newsletters are customarily sold by subscription as opposed to on
newsstands, although this requirement is not mentioned in the
regulation itself. See 60 FR at 15875.
To satisfy the registration deposit requirements for this group
option, the applicant must submit one complete copy of each issue that
is included in the group. 37 CFR 202.3(b)(9)(vi)(A). The current
regulation also states that if the newsletter is one that has been
selected for the Library's collections, the claimant is required to
provide either ``as many as two complimentary subscriptions of the
newsletter in the edition most suitable to the Library's needs,'' or
``a single positive, 35 mm silver halide microfilm meeting the
Library's best edition criteria that includes all issues published as
final editions in the designated calendar month,'' whichever the
Library prefers. Id. Sec. 202.3(b)(9)(vi)(B). This provision has been
in effect for more than fifteen years, but relatively few newsletters
have been selected for the Library's collection.
Finally, the current regulation states that registration must be
``sought within three months after the publication date of the last
issue included in the group.'' Id. Sec. 202.3(b)(9)(vii). The deadline
is intended to ensure that the Library receives these types of works in
a timely manner. 64 FR 19522, 29523 (Jun. 1, 1999). If the claimant is
unable to provide subscription copies or microfilm, or is unable to do
so within three months after publication, the regulation states that
each issue may be registered on an individual basis by submitting a
paper application on Form SE or Short Form SE. 37 CFR
202.3(b)(9)(vi)(C).
III. The Current Rule Governing Mandatory Deposit of Newsletters
Section 407 of the Copyright Act states that if a work is published
in the United States, the owner of copyright or the owner of the
exclusive right of publication must affirmatively deposit two copies of
the ``best edition'' of that work with the Library within three months
after publication. 17 U.S.C. 407(a)-(b). This is known as the
``mandatory deposit'' requirement. As a general rule, publishers may
satisfy this requirement by registering their works with the Office, or
by sending copies to the Copyright Office's Copyright Acquisitions
Division without seeking a registration. If a publisher fails to comply
with the mandatory deposit requirement, the Office may issue a written
demand for those works, and if the required copies are not received
within three months thereafter, the copyright owner or owner of the
exclusive right of publication in that work may be subject to fines or
other monetary liability. Id. 407(d). The Office has the authority to
establish regulations governing mandatory deposit, including
regulations to exempt any categories of material from these
requirements. See id. 407(c), 702.
Newsletters published in a physical format (including works
published both in physical and electronic formats) are subject to these
affirmative mandatory deposit requirements. 37 CFR 202.19(c)(5).
Electronic-only newsletters are subject to a separate mandatory deposit
regime. Specifically, in 2010, the Office adopted an interim rule that
established a different process for serials published solely in
electronic form. (Newsletters, as a type of serial, are subject to
these rules.) That interim rule established a general exemption for
most ``[e]lectronic works published in the United States and available
only online,'' except for serials published solely in electronic
formats (i.e., ``online-only'' serials). Id. For online-only serials,
there is no affirmative obligation to deposit works with the Copyright
Office. Instead, if the Library desires a particular serial title for
its collections, the Office will issue a written demand requiring the
publisher to deposit copies of that serial. Id. 202.24.
IV. The Proposed Rule
The existing regulations governing group registration of
newsletters require updating, both to better account for current
practice, and to allow the Office to streamline and modernize its
registration procedures. Accordingly, the Office is proposing to amend
the regulation governing the group option for newsletters to modify the
eligibility requirements for this group option in several respects.
To summarize, the proposed rule would do the following things:
(1) The rule would clarify and expand the category of works
eligible for the group registration option, including by eliminating
the work-for-hire requirement, by making clear that newsletters need
not be collective works, and by eliminating the three-month deadline
for filing the registration application.
(2) The rule would memorialize the Office's longstanding position
regarding the scope of a registration for a group of newsletter
issues--i.e., a registration for a group of newsletter issues covers
each issue in the group, and if each issue constitutes a collective
work, the articles, photographs, illustrations, or other contributions
appearing within those issues--if they are fully owned by the copyright
claimant and if they were first published in those issues.
(3) The rule would require applicants to register their newsletters
through the Office's electronic registration system, and would
discontinue the existing paper application.
(4) The rule would require applicants to upload their newsletters
in digital form through the electronic registration system; the Office
would no longer accept physical copies, such as a photocopy of each
issue in the group, or digital copies that have been saved onto a flash
drive, disc, or other physical storage medium that is delivered to the
Office.
(5) Newsletter publishers would no longer be required to provide
either subscriptions or microfilm copies for the Library's collections
as a condition for using the group registration option. But the rule
would also make clear that electronic deposits submitted to the Office
through the registration system would not satisfy the mandatory deposit
requirements in section 407, and would amend the mandatory deposit
regulations to provide guidance on fulfilling those requirements.
Specifically, if a newsletter is published in the United States in a
physical format, the publisher must provide the Library with two
complimentary subscriptions to the newsletter, unless it is informed
that the newsletter is not needed for the Library's collections.
Newsletters published only in electronic form will continue to be
subject to the existing on-demand mandatory deposit regime.
The next sections discuss changes warranting more discussion.
A. Works Eligible
The proposed rule clarifies that newsletter issues can be, but do
not have to be, collective works to qualify for the group registration
option. Thus, for example, a newsletter that contains a single article
and a single photograph would not be considered a collective work,
because it does not contain a sufficient number of contributions--but
nevertheless it would still be eligible for registration as part of the
group, if the rest of the eligibility requirements have been met.\2\ In
this respect, the proposed
[[Page 22904]]
rule differs from the corresponding group registration options for
serials and newspapers. To register a group of serials or newspapers,
each issue in the group must be a collective work. See 37 CFR
202.3(b)(6)(i)(C)-(E), 202.4(e)(2). By contrast, under the proposed
rule, publishers may register a group of newsletters whether or not
each issue satisfies the statutory definition for a collective work.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See H.R. Rep. No. 94-1476, at 122 (1976) (stating that a
work does not qualify as a collective work ``where relatively few
separate elements have been brought together,'' as in the case of
``a composition consisting of words and music, a work published with
illustrations or front matter, or three one-act plays'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The rule also clarifies that each newsletter issue in the group
must be fixed and distributed as a discrete, self-contained work.\3\ An
applicant may satisfy this requirement if the newsletter as a whole is
fixed in a tangible medium of expression, and the content of each issue
does not change once it has been distributed. For example, a publisher
that mails a newsletter to its subscribers would satisfy this
requirement, because the newsletter is clearly fixed and distributed in
a physical format. A publisher that emails an electronic newsletter to
its subscribers may satisfy this requirement if each issue contains a
fixed selection of content, such as a PDF version of a physical
publication. Similarly, a publisher that allows its subscribers to
download a newsletter from its website may satisfy this requirement if
each issue is distributed as a self-contained work and the content of
each issue does not change once it has been downloaded.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Similar language has appeared in the Compendium of U.S.
Copyright Office Practices, Third Edition since December 2014. See
Copyright Office, Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices sec.
1113 (3d ed. 2017) (hereinafter the ``Compendium'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The current regulation states that newsletter publishers must
submit their claims within three months after the publication of the
most recent issue in the group. 37 CFR 202.3(b)(9)(vii). The proposed
rule eliminates this requirement, as it existed as a means of
encouraging publishers to provide subscriptions or copies to the
Library as early as possible. Since the proposed rule eliminates that
requirement, the timeliness requirement can be eliminated as well,
especially because the Copyright Act itself already contains a number
of incentives for early registration.
The proposed rule continues the existing requirement that the works
be ``all new'' collective works or ``all new'' issues that have not
been published before.\4\ In other words, the issues included in the
group cannot be derivative versions of a previously published issue or
a newsletter that is frequently modified, updated, or adapted.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The current rule states that the works must be ``essentially
all new collective works or all new issues.'' 37 CFR 202.3(b)(9)(ii)
(emphasis added). The proposed rule eliminates the word
``essentially,'' as it is likely to cause confusion.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The proposed rule clarifies the scope of the group registration
option in various respects, including by eliminating the existing
reference to ``daily newsletters,'' 37 CFR 202.3(b)(9), which is
inaccurate, and by clarifying that a group of newsletters must
``usually'' be published at least two days a week, to account for
occasional situations where the newsletter suspends publication (e.g.,
for a holiday).
B. Scope of Protection
The proposed rule clarifies that a registration for a group of
newsletters covers each issue in the group, and each issue would be
registered as a separate work. In other words, the group registration
is treated as the legal equivalent of a separate registration for each
newsletter issue.
If the newsletters qualify and are claimed as collective works,
then those issues would be registered as separate collective works. As
a general rule, a registration for a collective work covers the
individual contributions contained within that work if they are fully
owned by the copyright claimant and if they were first published in
that work.\5\ A registration for a group of newsletter issues
constituting collective works is effectively treated as a separate
collective work registration for each issue in the group. Thus, in such
cases, the group registration also covers the articles, photographs,
illustrations, or other contributions appearing within those issues--if
they are fully owned by the copyright claimant at the time the
application was filed, and if they were first published in those
issues. By contrast, if an issue constituting a collective work
contains contributions that are not fully owned by the copyright
claimant, and/or contributions that were previously published, the
registration will not extend to those works. See Morris v. Business
Concepts, Inc., 259 F.3d 65, 71 (2d Cir. 2001) (``Unless the copyright
owner of a collective work also owns all the rights in a constituent
part, a collective work registration will not extend to the constituent
part.''), abrogated on other grounds by Reed Elsevier, Inc. v.
Muchnick, 559 U.S. 154, 160 (2010).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ See, e.g., Alaska Stock, LLC v. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt
Pub. Co., 747 F.3d 673, 683 (9th Cir. 2014); Morris v. Bus.
Concepts, Inc., 259 F.3d 65, 68 (2d Cir. 2001); Compendium secs.
509.1, 509.2; see also 17 U.S.C. 201(c) (``Copyright in each
separate contribution to a collective work is distinct from
copyright in the collective work as a whole, and vests initially in
the author of the contribution. In the absence of an express
transfer of the copyright or of any rights under it, the owner of
copyright in the collective work is presumed to have acquired only
the privilege of reproducing and distributing the contribution as
part of that particular collective work . . . .'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
With respect to the information collected as part of a group
registration and examination practices, the Office must balance the
public interest in creating a meaningful record (i.e., collecting
information regarding each individual contribution within a newsletter
issue) with the relative burden on applicants wishing to participate in
the registration system. When an applicant submits multiple issues, it
is difficult to collect granular information concerning the individual
articles, photographs, and other component works within each issue.
Requiring applicants to identify the author and title of each
individual contribution would impose a significant burden both on
applicants and the Office alike. This would discourage registration,
which in turn, would diminish the value of the Office's public record.
Imposing these burdens would also be contrary to the Congressional
purpose of providing the Office with the authority to create group
registration options: To ease the registration of certain works.
Accordingly, the Office's application to register a group of
newsletter issues does not contain spaces where the applicant can
provide titles, authors, or other identifying information for each
contribution, or identify component works created by a third party and
transferred to the claimant by written agreement. But the Office
foresees the future possibility of applicants submitting metadata for
the component works appearing within each issue, and the possibility of
the Office incorporating this information into the registration record.
If this becomes feasible once the Office implements its next-generation
registration system, it may require this type of information as a
condition for using this group registration option.
If each issue appears to be a collective work, the examiner will
examine the issue as a whole to determine if it contains sufficient
compilation authorship to warrant registration as a collective work.
And the examiner will review the issue to determine whether it contains
``a number of contributions'' constituting ``separate and independent
works in themselves'' 17 U.S.C. 101 (definition of ``collective
work''). When the Office issues a group registration, the certificate
will identify the title,
[[Page 22905]]
author, and claimant for each newsletter issue in the group, but it
will not identify the titles, authors, or claimants for the individual
contributions appearing within those issues.
The scope of protection for a group registration issued under the
proposed rule will have several consequences in infringement actions.
First, a group registration may be used to satisfy the statutory
requirements for instituting an infringement action involving any of
the newsletter issues that were included within the group.\6\ 17 U.S.C.
411(a). Likewise, a group registration may be used to enforce the
copyright in any of the individual contributions appearing within
issues constituting collective works--provided that the claimant fully
owned those contributions at the time the application for registration
is submitted, and provided that the contributions were first published
in one of those issues.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\6\ Alternatively, a plaintiff may satisfy this statutory
requirement if the Office refused registration, provided that the
plaintiff serves a copy of the complaint on the Register of
Copyrights. 17 U.S.C. 411(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Second, the proposed rule clarifies that the group as a whole is
not considered a compilation, a collective work, or a derivative work.
Instead, the group is merely an administrative classification created
solely for the purpose of registering multiple works with one
application and one filing fee. The chronological selection,
coordination, and arrangement of the issues within the group is
entirely dictated by the regulatory requirements for this option.
Likewise, when a group of newsletter issues are combined for the
purpose of facilitating registration, those works are not ``recast,
transformed, or adapted'' in any way, and the group as a whole is not
``a work based upon one or more preexisting works'' because there is no
copyrightable authorship in simply collecting a month of issues and
arranging them in chronological order. 17 U.S.C. 101 (definition of
``derivative work'').
C. Online Registration Requirement
On December 14, 2012, the Office made some modifications to its
electronic registration system to allow newsletter publishers to submit
their claims with the online application. Under the proposed rule,
applicants would be required to use the electronic application
designated for a group of newsletter issues as a condition for seeking
a group registration. The Office would no longer accept groups of
newsletter issues submitted for registration on paper using Form G/
DN.\7\ If, after the effective date of this rule, such paper
applications are received, the Office will refuse registration. The
Office invites comment on this proposal, including whether the Office
should eliminate the paper application for newsletter issues, phase it
out after a specified period of time, or continue to offer Form G/DN
for applicants who prefer to use the paper-based system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ Because the Office is proposing to eliminate Form G/DN, and
require applicants to submit their claims through the electronic
registration system, the term G/DN will soon be obsolete. Going
forward, the Office will refer to this option as ``GRNL,'' which
stands for ``group newsletters.'' In addition, the Office recently
issued a final rule that requires applicants to file an online
application in order to correct or amplify the information set forth
in a basic registration for any work capable of being registered
through the electronic system, rather than filing a paper
application. 82 FR 27424 (June 15, 2017). This online filing
requirement will apply to supplementary registrations for groups of
newsletter issues--even if the issues were originally registered
using Form G/DN. See 37 CFR 202.6(e)(1); 81 FR 86656, 86657, n.3
(Dec. 1, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Office's decision to offer a group option is entirely
discretionary, and Congress gave the Office broad authority to
establish the requirements for these types of claims. 17 U.S.C.
408(c)(1). Currently, the vast majority of the claims submitted on Form
G/DN require correspondence or other action from the Office, which
increases overall pendency and contributes to the Office's backlog of
pending claims. Applicants routinely file claims that are not eligible
for this group option, fail to provide information expressly requested
on the form, or add extraneous information that is not requested. In
each case, however, the Office must first scan these paper applications
into the registration system and input the relevant information by hand
before an examiner can reject the application as having been improperly
filed. This is a cumbersome, labor-intensive process, and if it is done
incorrectly, the information must be re-entered into the system. In
many cases, the Office must contact the applicant to request additional
information or permission to correct the application.
Addressing these issues imposes significant burdens on the Office's
limited resources, and has had an adverse effect on the examination of
other types of works within the Literary Division of the Registration
Program. Eliminating the paper application should mitigate many of
these problems. Among other improvements, the online application
contains automated validations that prevent applicants from submitting
applications that fail to comply with the eligibility requirements for
this group option, such as including too many issues in the group
(i.e., more than one calendar month of issues).
For these reasons, the Office believes that requiring applicants to
submit online applications is necessary to improve the overall
efficiency of the group registration process. Nonetheless, the Office
invites comment on this aspect of the proposed rule.
D. Digital Registration Deposits
As noted above, to register a group of newsletters under the
proposed rule, applicants will be required to submit a complete digital
copy of each issue in the group, regardless of whether the newsletter
is published in a physical or electronic form and regardless of whether
the newsletter is published in the United States or abroad. Requiring
applicants to upload digital copies to the electronic system will
increase the efficiency of the group registration process. The Office
does not need physical copies to examine a newsletter for copyrightable
authorship, or to determine whether the applicant satisfied the formal
and legal requirements for this group option. See 17 U.S.C. 410(a)
(providing that the Register of Copyrights must determine whether
``material deposited [for registration] constitutes copyrightable
subject matter''). Electronic submissions also take less time to
process, and are easier to track and handle than physical copies. A
registration specialist can examine a digital copy as soon as it has
been uploaded to the electronic registration system. By contrast, when
an applicant submits an online application and mails a physical deposit
to the Office, it may take weeks to connect the application with the
correct deposit. In addition, each copy must be moved multiple times
during the examination process.
Requiring digital uploads may also provide newsletter publishers
with certain legal benefits. When the Office registers a group of
newsletters and issues a certificate of registration, the effective
date of registration is the date on which the Office received the
application, filing fee, and deposit in proper form. When an applicant
uploads a digital copy of the deposit to the electronic system, the
Office typically receives the application, filing fee, and deposit on
the same date. By contrast, when an applicant sends physical copies to
the Office, the deposit may arrive long after the date that the
application and filing fee were
[[Page 22906]]
received--thereby establishing a later effective date of
registration.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ The Office recognizes that some publishers may not have a
digital copy of their issues or may find it difficult to create a
digital copy for the purpose of seeking a group registration. The
Office proposes to address these concerns on a case-by-case basis.
If an applicant is unable to upload a particular newsletter to the
electronic system, the applicant may request special relief from the
deposit requirements under 37 CFR 202.20(d).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
E. Mandatory Deposit
Although the proposed rule eliminates the requirement to provide
subscriptions or microfilm as a condition of using the group
registration option, newsletter publishers would still generally be
subject to the mandatory deposit requirement under section 407.
To assist publishers with complying with these mandatory deposit
requirements, the proposed rule amends the Office's mandatory deposit
regulations, 37 CFR 202.19, to provide specific rules for all serials
(a definition that includes newsletters) that are published in the
United States in a physical format or in both a physical and electronic
format.\9\ Newsletter publishers will be expected to provide two
complimentary subscriptions to such newsletters, unless they have been
informed by CAD that the serial title is not needed for the Library's
collections. If subscription copies are not received within three
months after publication of each issue, the Copyright Acquisitions
Division (``CAD'') may issue a written demand for ongoing subscriptions
to that publication. The failure to provide subscription copies when
demanded by the Office would subject the owner to penalties under
section 407.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ The same proposal is being made as part of the notice of
proposed rulemaking relating to group registration of serials.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
No change is being made to the mandatory deposit scheme for
electronic-only serials; such serials will continue to be subject to
the existing, demand-based mandatory deposit scheme.\10\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ See 37 CFR 202.19(c)(5), 202.24(a).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
V. Conclusion
The proposed rule, if adopted, will encourage broader participation
in the registration system, and increase the efficiency of the process
for both the Office and copyright owners alike, while providing the
Library with a means for adding newsletters to its collections. The
Office invites public comment on all these proposed changes.
List of Subjects
37 CFR Part 201
Copyright, General Provisions.
37 CFR Part 202
Copyright, Preregistration and registration of claims to copyright.
Proposed Regulation
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Copyright Office
proposes amending 37 CFR parts 201 and 202 as follows:
PART 201--GENERAL PROVISIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 201 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 702.
0
2. Amend Sec. 201.1 by revising paragraph (c)(6) to read as follows:
Sec. 201.1 Communication with the U.S. Copyright Office.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(6) Mandatory Deposit Copies. Mandatory deposit copies of published
works submitted for the Library of Congress under 17 U.S.C. 407 and
Sec. 202.19 of this chapter (including complimentary subscriptions to
serial publications), and newspaper microfilm copies submitted under
Sec. 202.4(e) of this chapter, should be addressed to: Library of
Congress, U.S. Copyright Office, Attn: 407 Deposits, 101 Independence
Avenue SE, Washington, DC 20559-6600.
* * * * *
PART 202--PREREGISTRATION AND REGISTRATION OF CLAIMS TO COPYRIGHT
0
3. The authority citation for part 202 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 408(f), 702.
Sec. 202.3 [Amended]
0
4. Amend Sec. 202.3 by removing and reserving paragraph (b)(9).
0
5. Amend Sec. 202.4 by adding paragraph (f) and a new sentence after
the first sentence of paragraph (n) to read as follows.
Sec. 202.4 Group Registration.
* * * * *
(f) Group registration of newsletters. Pursuant to the authority
granted by 17 U.S.C. 408(c)(1), the Register of Copyrights has
determined that a group of newsletter issues may be registered with one
application, one filing fee, the required deposit, and the filing fee
required by Sec. 201.3(c) of this chapter, if the following conditions
are met:
(1) Eligible works.
(A) All the issues in the group must be newsletters. For purposes
of this section, a newsletter is a serial that is published and
distributed by mail, electronic media, or other medium, including
paper, email, or download. Publication must usually occur at least two
days each week and the newsletter must contain news or information that
is chiefly of interest to a special group, such as trade and
professional associations, colleges, schools, or churches. Newsletters
are typically distributed through subscriptions, but are not
distributed through newsstands or other retail outlets.
(B) The group must include at least two issues.
(C) Each issue in the group must be an all-new issue or an all-new
collective work that has not been previously published, and each issue
must be fixed and distributed as a discrete, self-contained work.
(D) The author and claimant for each issue must be the same person
or organization.
(E) All the issues in the group must be published under the same
continuing title, they must be published within the same calendar month
and bear issue dates within that month, and the applicant must identify
the earliest and latest date that the issues were published during that
month.
(2) Application. The applicant must complete and submit the online
application designated for a group of newsletter issues. The
application may be submitted by any of the parties listed in Sec.
202.3(c)(1).
(3) Deposit. The applicant must submit one complete copy of each
issue that is included in the group. The issues must be submitted in
digital form, and each issue must be contained in a separate electronic
file. The applicant must use the file-naming convention and submit
digital files in accordance with instructions specified on the
Copyright Office's website. The files must be submitted in Portable
Document Format (PDF), they must be assembled in an orderly form, and
they must be uploaded to the electronic registration system as
individual electronic files (i.e., not .zip files). The files must be
viewable and searchable, contain embedded fonts, and be free from any
access restrictions (such as those implemented through digital rights
management) that prevent the viewing and examination of the work. The
file size for each uploaded file must not exceed 500 megabytes, but
files may be compressed to comply with this requirement. Copies
submitted under this paragraph will be considered solely for the
purpose of registration under section 408 of title 17 of the United
States Code, and will not satisfy the mandatory deposit requirement
under
[[Page 22907]]
section 407 of title 17 of the United States Code.
* * * * *
(n) The scope of a group registration. * * * When the Office issues
a group registration under paragraph (f) of this section, the
registration covers each issue in the group and each issue is
registered as a separate work or a separate collective work (as the
case may be). * * *
0
6. Amend Sec. 202.19 by adding paragraph (d)(2)(x) to read as follows:
Sec. 202.19 Deposit of published copies or phonorecords for the
Library of Congress.
* * * * *
(d) * * *
(2) * * *
(x) In the case of serials (as defined in Sec. 202.3(b)(1)(v), but
excluding newspapers) published in the United States in a physical
format, or in both a physical and an electronic format, the copyright
owner or the owner of the exclusive right of publication must provide
the Library of Congress with two complimentary subscriptions to the
serial, unless the Copyright Acquisitions Division informs the owner
that the serial is not needed for the Library's collections.
Subscription copies must be physically mailed to the Copyright Office,
at the address for mandatory deposit copies specified in Sec. 201.1(c)
of this chapter, promptly after the publication of each issue, and the
subscription(s) must be maintained on an ongoing basis. The owner may
cancel the subscription(s) if the serial is no longer published by the
owner, if the serial is no longer published in the United States in a
physical format, or if the Copyright Acquisitions Division informs the
owner that the serial is no longer needed for the Library's
collections. In addition, prior to commencing the subscriptions, the
owner must send a letter to the Copyright Acquisitions Division at the
address specified in Sec. 201.1(b) of this chapter confirming that the
owner will provide the requested number of subscriptions for the
Library of Congress. The letter must include the name of the publisher,
the title of the newsletter, the International Standard Serial Number
(``ISSN'') that has been assigned to the newsletter (if any), and the
issue date and the numerical or chronological designations that appear
on the first issue that will be provided under the subscriptions.
Dated: May 11, 2018.
Sarang V. Damle,
General Counsel and Associate Register of Copyrights.
[FR Doc. 2018-10420 Filed 5-16-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410-30-P