Importation of Pummelo From Thailand Into the Continental United States, 13433-13436 [2018-06288]
Download as PDF
13433
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 83, No. 61
Thursday, March 29, 2018
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
7 CFR Part 319
[Docket No. APHIS–2016–0034]
RIN 0579–AE33
Importation of Pummelo From Thailand
Into the Continental United States
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
Background
We are proposing to amend
the regulations to allow the importation
of fresh pummelo fruit from Thailand
into the continental United States. As a
condition of entry, fresh pummelo fruit
from Thailand would be subject to a
systems approach that would include
irradiation treatment, packinghouse
processing requirements, and port of
entry inspection. The fruit would also
be required to be imported in
commercial consignments and be
accompanied by a phytosanitary
certificate issued by the national plant
protection organization of Thailand.
This action would allow for the
importation of fresh pummelo fruit from
Thailand while continuing to provide
protection against the introduction of
plant pests into the continental United
States.
DATES: We will consider all comments
that we receive on or before May 29,
2018.
SUMMARY:
You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2016-0034.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Send your comment to Docket No.
APHIS–2016–0034, Regulatory Analysis
and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station
3A–03.8, 4700 River Road, Unit 118,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1238.
Supporting documents and any
comments we receive on this docket
rmajette on DSKBCKNHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
ADDRESSES:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:13 Mar 28, 2018
Jkt 244001
may be viewed at https://
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=APHIS–2016–0034 or
in our reading room, which is located in
Room 1141 of the USDA South
Building, 14th Street and Independence
Avenue SW, Washington, DC. Normal
reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
holidays. To be sure someone is there to
help you, please call (202) 799–7039
before coming.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms.
Claudia A. Ferguson, MS, Senior
Regulatory Policy Coordinator, Imports,
Regulations, and Manuals, Regulatory
Coordination and Compliance, PPQ,
APHIS, 4700 River Road, Unit 133,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1236; (301) 851–
2352.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Under the regulations in ‘‘Subpart–
Fruits and Vegetables’’ (7 CFR 319.56–
1 through 319.56–82, referred to below
as the regulations), the Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)
of the United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA) prohibits or
restricts the importation of fruits and
vegetables into the United States from
certain parts of the world to prevent the
introduction and dissemination of plant
pests.
The regulations currently do not
authorize the importation of fresh
pummelo fruit (Citrus maxima (Berm.)
Merr.) from Thailand. The national
plant protection organization (NPPO) of
Thailand has requested that APHIS
amend the regulations to allow the
importation of commercially produced
fresh pummelo fruit from Thailand into
the continental United States. In
evaluating Thailand’s request, we
prepared a pest risk assessment (PRA)
and a risk management document
(RMD). Copies of the PRA and the RMD
may be obtained from the person listed
under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT or viewed on the
Regulations.gov website (see ADDRESSES
above for instructions for accessing
Regulations.gov).
The PRA, titled ‘‘Importation of Fruit
of Pummelo, Citrus maxima (Burm.)
Merr., from Thailand into the
Continental United States’’ (December
2017) analyzes the potential pest risk
associated with the importation of fresh
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
pummelo fruit into the continental
United States from Thailand.
The PRA identifies 21 actionable
pests that could be introduced into the
United States in consignments of fresh
pummelo fruit from Thailand. The pests
listed in the PRA are as follows:
• Bactrocera correcta Bezzi, guava
fruit fly;
• Bactrocera cucurbitae Coquillett,
melon fruit fly;
• Bactrocera dorsalis Hendel, oriental
fruit fly;
• Bactrocera papayae Drew &
Hancock, Asian papaya fruit fly;
• Bactrocera tau Walker, a complex
of fruit flies;
• Ceroplastes rubens Maskell, pink
wax scale;
• Citripestis sagittiferella Moore,
citrus fruit borer;
• Eotetranychus cendanai Rimando,
citrus yellow mite;
• Monacrostichus citricola Bezzi, a
fruit fly;
• Nipaecoccus viridis Newstead,
spherical mealybug;
• Paradrosophila punctipennis Duda,
a fruit fly;
• Phyllosticta citriasiana Wulandari,
Crous & Gruyter, the causal agent for
citrus tan spot;
• Phyllosticta citricarpa, the causal
agent for citrus black spot;
• Planococcus lilacinus Cockerell,
cacao mealybug;
`
• Prays citri Milliere, citrus flower
moth;
• Prays endocarpa Meyrick, citrus
pock caterpillar;
• Pseudococcus cryptus Hempel,
citriculus mealybug;
• Rastrococcus spinosus Robinson,
Philippine mango mealybug;
• Rastrococcus tropicasiaticus
Williams, a mealybug;
• Schizotetranychus baltazari
Rimando, Bamboo spider mite; and
• Xanthomonas citri Gabriel et al.
(XCC), the causal agent for citrus canker.
Based on the findings of the PRA,
APHIS has determined that measures
beyond standard port of entry
inspection are required to mitigate the
risks posed by these pests. These
measures are identified in the RMD and
are used as the basis for the
requirements included in this proposed
rule. We are therefore proposing to
allow the importation of fresh pummelo
fruit from Thailand into the continental
United States if it is produced and
E:\FR\FM\29MRP1.SGM
29MRP1
13434
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 61 / Thursday, March 29, 2018 / Proposed Rules
shipped in accordance with the systems
approach as described below. The
requirements of the systems approach
would be added to the regulations as a
new § 319.56–83.
Commercial Consignments
Only commercial consignments of
fresh pummelo fruit from Thailand
would be accepted for import into the
continental United States. Produce
grown commercially is less likely to be
infested with plant pests than
noncommercial consignments.
Noncommercial consignments are more
prone to infestations because the
commodity is often ripe to overripe,
could be of a variety with unknown
susceptibility to pests, or is grown with
little or no pest control. Commercial
consignments, as defined in § 319.56–2,
are consignments that an inspector
identifies as having been imported for
sale and distribution. Such
identification is based on a variety of
indicators, including, but not limited to:
Quantity of produce, type of packing,
identification of grower or packinghouse
on the packaging, and documents
consigning the fruits or vegetables to a
wholesaler or retailer.
rmajette on DSKBCKNHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Treatments
Under this proposed rule, fresh
pummelo fruit from Thailand would be
required to be treated with a minimum
absorbed irradiation dose of 400 Gy in
accordance with § 305.9 of the
phytosanitary treatment regulations in 7
CFR part 305. This is the established
generic dose for all insect pests except
pupae and adults of the order
Lepidoptera.
While it is true that three of the
quarantine pests associated with fresh
pummelo fruit from Thailand are
Lepidopteran, irradiation in conjunction
with other mitigations against
Lepidopteran pests, can provide
phytosanitary protection for several
reasons:
• While the treatment is not lethal to
pupae and adults of the order
Lepidoptera, it is lethal to larvae. Larvae
are of greatest phytosanitary concern
given that they are internal feeders and
may therefore be overlooked upon
inspection.
• Irradiation tends to prevent normal
adult emergence from the pupal stage.
• Irradiation also causes sterility in
pupae and emerged adults, preventing
further larval reproduction. Moreover,
pupae and adult Lepidoptera are
unlikely to be associated with fresh
pummelo fruit.
The shipments of fresh pummelo fruit
from Thailand would also have to meet
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:13 Mar 28, 2018
Jkt 244001
Port of Entry Inspection
Shipments of fresh pummelo fruit
from Thailand would be subject to
inspection at the port of entry. This will
provide an additional layer of
phytosanitary protection in order to
prevent the dissemination of plant pests
into the continental United States.
therefore, has not been reviewed by the
Office of Management and Budget. This
proposed rule is not expected to be an
Executive Order 13771 regulatory action
because this proposed rule is not
significant under Executive Order
12866.
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 603, we
have performed an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis, which is
summarized below, regarding the
economic effects of this proposed rule
on small entities. Copies of the full
analysis are available by contacting the
person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT or on the
Regulations.gov website (see ADDRESSES
above for instructions for accessing
Regulations.gov).
Pummelo is a relatively minor citrus
fruit for which there is limited
information. There are no official
statistics on the volume or value of
pummelos produced or consumed in the
United States. Agricultural statistics for
California report that the area planted in
pummelo and hybrid groves in 2016
totaled 1,587 acres. California
production that year totaled 540,000
boxes, or about 19,595 metric tons, and
had a farm gate value of $9.04 million.
The expected volume of imports from
Thailand would be the equivalent of
about 1 percent of California’s pummelo
production. Unofficially, there are about
100 pummelo growers in California. The
majority of these producers likely
operate as small entities, given that this
is true for producers of citrus fruit
generally.
Information on pummelo production
in Arizona, Florida, or Texas is not
available. U.S. import and export data
specific to pummelo are also not
available because pummelo is grouped
with grapefruit in Department of
Commerce trade statistics (Harmonized
Tariff Schedule 080540).
Based on the information we have,
there is no reason to conclude that
adoption of this proposed rule would
result in any significant economic effect
on a substantial number of small
entities. However, we do not currently
have all of the data necessary for a
comprehensive analysis of the effects of
this proposed rule on small entities.
Therefore, we are inviting comments on
potential effects. In particular, we are
interested in determining the number
and kind of small entities that may
incur benefits or costs from the
implementation of this proposed rule.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13771 and
Regulatory Flexibility Act
This proposed rule has been
determined to be not significant for the
purposes of Executive Order 12866 and,
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule would allow fresh
pummelo fruit to be imported into the
continental United States from Thailand
under a systems approach. If this
all other relevant treatment
requirements in part 305.
Packinghouse Procedures
Those plant pests associated with the
importation pathway for fresh pummelo
fruit from Thailand that are non-Insecta
(XCC, P. citriasiana, and P. citricarpa),
Insecta but not neutralized by
irradiation (E. cendanai and S.
baltazari), and the pupae and adult
forms of lepidoptera (C. sagittiferella, P.
citri, and P. endocarpa), require the
application of additional mitigations.
Prior to packing, the fresh pummelo
fruit would have to be washed, brushed,
and disinfested. The fresh pummelo
fruit would also be required to be
submerged in a surfactant, treated for
XCC with an APHIS-approved surface
disinfectant, and treated for P.
citriasiana and P. citricarpa with an
APHIS-approved fungicide. These
packinghouse processing requirements
will ensure that all pests of concern not
mitigated by irradiation are removed
from the importation pathway.
Phytosanitary Certificate
A phytosanitary certificate issued by
the NPPO of Thailand would have to
accompany each consignment of fresh
pummelo fruit. If the fresh pummelo
fruit was irradiated in Thailand, the
fresh pummelo fruit would have to be
jointly inspected by APHIS and the
NPPO of Thailand, and the
phytosanitary certificate would have to
contain additional declarations attesting
to this joint inspection and to the
irradiation of the fresh pummelo fruit in
Thailand. If the fresh pummelo fruit
will be irradiated upon arrival in the
United States, these additional
declarations would not be needed.
The phytosanitary certificate ensures
the fresh pummelo fruit was inspected
by the NPPO of Thailand, and certifies
that the fresh pummelo fruit meets our
requirements for export to the
continental United States. Additional
declarations provide assurances
regarding joint inspection and proper
administration of irradiation treatment.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\29MRP1.SGM
29MRP1
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 61 / Thursday, March 29, 2018 / Proposed Rules
proposed rule is adopted, State and
local laws and regulations regarding
fresh pummelo fruit imported under
this rule would be preempted while the
fruit is in foreign commerce. Fresh fruits
are generally imported for immediate
distribution and sale to the consuming
public and would remain in foreign
commerce until sold to the ultimate
consumer. The question of when foreign
commerce ceases in other cases must be
addressed on a case-by-case basis. If this
proposed rule is adopted, no retroactive
effect will be given to this rule, and this
rule will not require administrative
proceedings before parties may file suit
in court challenging this rule.
rmajette on DSKBCKNHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with section 3507(d) of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), reporting and
recordkeeping requirements included in
this proposed rule have been submitted
for approval to the Office of
Management and Budget (OMB). Please
send comments on the Information
Collection Request (ICR) to OMB’s
Office of Information and Regulatory
Affairs via email to oira_submissions@
omb.eop.gov, Attention: Desk Officer for
APHIS, Washington, DC 20503. Please
state that your comments refer to Docket
No. APHIS–2016–0034. Please send a
copy of your comments to the USDA
using one of the methods described
under ADDRESSES at the beginning of
this document.
APHIS is proposing to amend the
regulations to allow the importation of
fresh pummelo fruit from Thailand into
the continental United States. As a
condition of entry, fresh pummelo fruit
from Thailand would be subject to a
systems approach that would include
irradiation treatment, packinghouse
processing requirements, and port of
entry inspection. The fruit would also
be required to be imported in
commercial consignments and
accompanied by a phytosanitary
certificate issued by the NPPO of
Thailand. This action would allow for
the importation of fresh pummelo fruit
from Thailand while continuing to
provide protection against the
introduction of plant pests into the
continental United States.
Implementing this information
collection will require respondents to
complete phytosanitary certificates and
port of entry inspections.
We are soliciting comments from the
public (as well as affected agencies)
concerning our proposed information
collection and recordkeeping
requirements. These comments will
help us:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:13 Mar 28, 2018
Jkt 244001
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
information collection is necessary for
the proper performance of our agency’s
functions, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of our
estimate of the burden of the proposed
information collection, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
information collection on those who are
to respond (such as through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses).
Estimate of burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
is estimated to average 0.67 hours per
response.
Respondents: Foreign businesses and
the NPPO of Thailand.
Estimated annual number of
respondents: 2.
Estimated annual number of
responses per respondent: 18.
Estimated annual number of
responses: 36.
Estimated total annual burden on
respondents: 24 hours. (Due to
averaging, the total annual burden hours
may not equal the product of the annual
number of responses multiplied by the
reporting burden per response.)
A copy of the information collection
may be viewed on the Regulations.gov
website or in our reading room. (A link
to Regulations.gov and information on
the location and hours of the reading
room are provided under the heading
ADDRESSES at the beginning of this
proposed rule.) Copies can also be
obtained from Ms. Kimberly Hardy,
APHIS’ Information Collection
Coordinator, at (301) 851–2483. APHIS
will respond to any ICR-related
comments in the final rule. All
comments will also become a matter of
public record.
E-Government Act Compliance
The Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service is committed to
compliance with the E-Government Act
to promote the use of the internet and
other information technologies, to
provide increased opportunities for
citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other
purposes. For information pertinent to
E-Government Act compliance related
to this proposed rule, please contact Ms.
Kimberly Hardy, APHIS’ Information
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
13435
Collection Coordinator, at (301) 851–
2483.
Lists of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 319
Coffee, Cotton, Fruits, Imports, Logs,
Nursery stock, Plant diseases and pests,
Quarantine, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Rice,
Vegetables.
Accordingly, we are proposing to
amend 7 CFR part 319 as follows:
PART 319—FOREIGN QUARANTINE
NOTICES
1. The authority citation for part 319
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701–7772, and
7781–7786; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 7 CFR
2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
2. Section 319.56–83 is added to read
as follows:
■
§ 319.56–83
Pummelo From Thailand.
Fresh pummelo fruit (Citrus maxima
(Burm.) Merr.) (Rutaceae) may be
imported into the continental United
States from Thailand under the
following conditions:
(a) Commercial consignments. The
fresh pummelo fruit must be shipped in
commercial consignments only.
(b) Irradiation treatment. The fresh
pummelo fruit must be treated with
irradiation in accordance with part 305
of this chapter.
(c) Packinghouse procedures. Prior to
packing, the fresh pummelo fruit must
be washed, brushed, disinfested,
submerged in surfactant, treated for
Xanthomonas citri Gabriel et al. with an
APHIS-approved surface disinfectant,
and treated for Phyllosticta citriasiana
and Phyllosticta citricarpa with an
APHIS-approved fungicide.
(d) Phytosanitary certificate. Each
shipment of fresh pummelo fruit must
be accompanied by a phytosanitary
certificate issued by the national plant
protection organization (NPPO) of
Thailand. If the fresh pummelo fruit was
irradiated in Thailand, each
consignment of fruit must be inspected
jointly in Thailand by APHIS and the
NPPO of Thailand, and the
phytosanitary certificate must contain
an additional declaration attesting to
irradiation of the fresh pummelo fruit in
accordance with part 305 of this
chapter. If the fresh pummelo fruit will
be irradiated upon arrival into the
continental United States, joint
inspection in Thailand and an
additional declaration on the
phytosanitary certificate are not
required.
(e) Port of entry inspection.
Consignments of fresh pummelo fruit
from Thailand are subject to inspection
E:\FR\FM\29MRP1.SGM
29MRP1
13436
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 61 / Thursday, March 29, 2018 / Proposed Rules
at ports of entry in the continental
United States.
Done in Washington, DC, this 23rd day of
March 2018.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2018–06288 Filed 3–28–18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
´
´
Valerie Andre, 78140 VELIZY–
VILLACOUBLAY—FRANCE; phone:
+33 (0) 1 46 29 81 00; internet:
www.safran-landing-systems.com. You
may view this service information at the
FAA, Transport Standards Branch, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA. For
information on the availability of this
material at the FAA, call 206–231–3195.
Examining the AD Docket
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2018–0167; Product
Identifier 2017–NM–131–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; ATR–GIE
´
Avions de Transport Regional
Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to adopt a new
airworthiness directive (AD) for all
´
ATR–GIE Avions de Transport Regional
Model ATR42 and Model ATR72
airplanes. This proposed AD was
prompted by reports of cracking in main
landing gear (MLG) universal joints (Ujoints). This proposed AD would require
repetitive detailed inspections of the
affected U-joints for cracks, and
replacement if necessary. This proposed
AD would also provide an optional
terminating action for the repetitive
inspections. We are proposing this AD
to address the unsafe condition on these
products.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by May 14, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments,
using the procedures found in 14 CFR
11.43 and 11.45, by any of the following
methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: Deliver to mail
address above between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this NPRM, contact Safran Landing
´ ´
Systems, Inovel Parc Sud-7, rue General
rmajette on DSKBCKNHB2PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
15:13 Mar 28, 2018
Jkt 244001
You may examine the AD docket on
the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2018–
0167; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this NPRM, the regulatory
evaluation, any comments received, and
other information. The street address for
the Docket Operations office (telephone
800–647–5527) is in the ADDRESSES
section. Comments will be available in
the AD docket shortly after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Shahram Daneshmandi, Aerospace
Engineer, International Section,
Transport Standards Branch, FAA, 2200
South 216th St., Des Moines, WA 98198;
telephone and fax 206–231–3220.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Comments Invited
We invite you to send any written
relevant data, views, or arguments about
this proposed AD. Send your comments
to an address listed under the
ADDRESSES section. Include ‘‘Docket No.
FAA–2018–0167; Product Identifier
2017–NM–131–AD’’ at the beginning of
your comments. We specifically invite
comments on the overall regulatory,
economic, environmental, and energy
aspects of this NPRM. We will consider
all comments received by the closing
date and may amend this NPRM based
on those comments.
We will post all comments we
receive, without change, to https://
www.regulations.gov, including any
personal information you provide. We
will also post a report summarizing each
substantive verbal contact we receive
about this NPRM.
Discussion
The European Aviation Safety Agency
(EASA), which is the Technical Agent
for the Member States of the European
Union, has issued EASA Airworthiness
Directive 2017–0172, dated September
7, 2017 (referred to after this as the
Mandatory Continuing Airworthiness
Information, or ‘‘the MCAI’’), to correct
an unsafe condition for all ATR–GIE
´
Avions de Transport Regional Model
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ATR42 and Model ATR72 airplanes.
The MCAI states:
Occurences were reported of finding
cracked universal joints (U-joints) Part
Number (P/N) D56805, P/N D56805–2, P/N
D61036 and P/N D62050. Subsequent
investigation identified a batch of affected Ujoints which were subjected to a possible
non-detected thermal abuse done during the
grinding process by the U-joint manufacturer
in production, or by a maintenance
organization during overhaul and/or repair.
This condition, if not detected and
corrected, could lead to MLG structural
failure and subsequent collapse of the MLG,
possibly resulting in damage to the aeroplane
and injury to the occupants.
To address this potential unsafe condition,
SAFRAN Landing Systems (SLS), published
Service Bulletin (SB) 631–32–249 for MLGs
fitted on ATR42–200, ATR42–300 and
ATR42–320; SB 631–32–250 for MLGs fitted
on ATR42–400 and ATR42–500; and SB 631–
32–251 for MLGs fitted on ATR72 (all
models), to provide inspection instructions.
For the reasons described above, this
[EASA] AD requires repetitive detailed visual
inspections (DVI) of the affected U-joints for
cracks, and, depending on findings,
replacement with a serviceable part [and
provides an optional terminating action].
You may examine the MCAI in the
AD docket on the internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2018–
0167.
Related Service Information Under 1
CFR Part 51
Safran Landing Systems has issued
Service Bulletin 631–32–249, Revision
1, dated June 26, 2017; Service Bulletin
631–32–250, Revision 1, dated June 26,
2017; and Service Bulletin 631–32–251,
Revision 1, dated June 26, 2017. The
service information describes
procedures for detailed inspections of
the affected U-joints for cracking, and
replacement if necessary. These
documents are distinct since they apply
to different airplane models. This
service information is reasonably
available because the interested parties
have access to it through their normal
course of business or by the means
identified in the ADDRESSES section.
FAA’s Determination and Requirements
of This Proposed AD
This product has been approved by
the aviation authority of another
country, and is approved for operation
in the United States. Pursuant to our
bilateral agreement with the State of
Design Authority, we have been notified
of the unsafe condition described in the
MCAI and service information
referenced above. We are proposing this
AD because we evaluated all pertinent
information and determined an unsafe
condition exists and is likely to exist or
E:\FR\FM\29MRP1.SGM
29MRP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 83, Number 61 (Thursday, March 29, 2018)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 13433-13436]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2018-06288]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 83, No. 61 / Thursday, March 29, 2018 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 13433]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
7 CFR Part 319
[Docket No. APHIS-2016-0034]
RIN 0579-AE33
Importation of Pummelo From Thailand Into the Continental United
States
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are proposing to amend the regulations to allow the
importation of fresh pummelo fruit from Thailand into the continental
United States. As a condition of entry, fresh pummelo fruit from
Thailand would be subject to a systems approach that would include
irradiation treatment, packinghouse processing requirements, and port
of entry inspection. The fruit would also be required to be imported in
commercial consignments and be accompanied by a phytosanitary
certificate issued by the national plant protection organization of
Thailand. This action would allow for the importation of fresh pummelo
fruit from Thailand while continuing to provide protection against the
introduction of plant pests into the continental United States.
DATES: We will consider all comments that we receive on or before May
29, 2018.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2016-0034.
Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Send your comment to
Docket No. APHIS-2016-0034, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD,
APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road, Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-
1238.
Supporting documents and any comments we receive on this docket may
be viewed at https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2016-
0034 or in our reading room, which is located in Room 1141 of the USDA
South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue SW, Washington, DC.
Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 799-7039 before coming.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ms. Claudia A. Ferguson, MS, Senior
Regulatory Policy Coordinator, Imports, Regulations, and Manuals,
Regulatory Coordination and Compliance, PPQ, APHIS, 4700 River Road,
Unit 133, Riverdale, MD 20737-1236; (301) 851-2352.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under the regulations in ``Subpart-Fruits and Vegetables'' (7 CFR
319.56-1 through 319.56-82, referred to below as the regulations), the
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) of the United States
Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits or restricts the importation
of fruits and vegetables into the United States from certain parts of
the world to prevent the introduction and dissemination of plant pests.
The regulations currently do not authorize the importation of fresh
pummelo fruit (Citrus maxima (Berm.) Merr.) from Thailand. The national
plant protection organization (NPPO) of Thailand has requested that
APHIS amend the regulations to allow the importation of commercially
produced fresh pummelo fruit from Thailand into the continental United
States. In evaluating Thailand's request, we prepared a pest risk
assessment (PRA) and a risk management document (RMD). Copies of the
PRA and the RMD may be obtained from the person listed under FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT or viewed on the Regulations.gov website
(see ADDRESSES above for instructions for accessing Regulations.gov).
The PRA, titled ``Importation of Fruit of Pummelo, Citrus maxima
(Burm.) Merr., from Thailand into the Continental United States''
(December 2017) analyzes the potential pest risk associated with the
importation of fresh pummelo fruit into the continental United States
from Thailand.
The PRA identifies 21 actionable pests that could be introduced
into the United States in consignments of fresh pummelo fruit from
Thailand. The pests listed in the PRA are as follows:
Bactrocera correcta Bezzi, guava fruit fly;
Bactrocera cucurbitae Coquillett, melon fruit fly;
Bactrocera dorsalis Hendel, oriental fruit fly;
Bactrocera papayae Drew & Hancock, Asian papaya fruit fly;
Bactrocera tau Walker, a complex of fruit flies;
Ceroplastes rubens Maskell, pink wax scale;
Citripestis sagittiferella Moore, citrus fruit borer;
Eotetranychus cendanai Rimando, citrus yellow mite;
Monacrostichus citricola Bezzi, a fruit fly;
Nipaecoccus viridis Newstead, spherical mealybug;
Paradrosophila punctipennis Duda, a fruit fly;
Phyllosticta citriasiana Wulandari, Crous & Gruyter, the
causal agent for citrus tan spot;
Phyllosticta citricarpa, the causal agent for citrus black
spot;
Planococcus lilacinus Cockerell, cacao mealybug;
Prays citri Milli[egrave]re, citrus flower moth;
Prays endocarpa Meyrick, citrus pock caterpillar;
Pseudococcus cryptus Hempel, citriculus mealybug;
Rastrococcus spinosus Robinson, Philippine mango mealybug;
Rastrococcus tropicasiaticus Williams, a mealybug;
Schizotetranychus baltazari Rimando, Bamboo spider mite;
and
Xanthomonas citri Gabriel et al. (XCC), the causal agent
for citrus canker.
Based on the findings of the PRA, APHIS has determined that
measures beyond standard port of entry inspection are required to
mitigate the risks posed by these pests. These measures are identified
in the RMD and are used as the basis for the requirements included in
this proposed rule. We are therefore proposing to allow the importation
of fresh pummelo fruit from Thailand into the continental United States
if it is produced and
[[Page 13434]]
shipped in accordance with the systems approach as described below. The
requirements of the systems approach would be added to the regulations
as a new Sec. 319.56-83.
Commercial Consignments
Only commercial consignments of fresh pummelo fruit from Thailand
would be accepted for import into the continental United States.
Produce grown commercially is less likely to be infested with plant
pests than noncommercial consignments. Noncommercial consignments are
more prone to infestations because the commodity is often ripe to
overripe, could be of a variety with unknown susceptibility to pests,
or is grown with little or no pest control. Commercial consignments, as
defined in Sec. 319.56-2, are consignments that an inspector
identifies as having been imported for sale and distribution. Such
identification is based on a variety of indicators, including, but not
limited to: Quantity of produce, type of packing, identification of
grower or packinghouse on the packaging, and documents consigning the
fruits or vegetables to a wholesaler or retailer.
Treatments
Under this proposed rule, fresh pummelo fruit from Thailand would
be required to be treated with a minimum absorbed irradiation dose of
400 Gy in accordance with Sec. 305.9 of the phytosanitary treatment
regulations in 7 CFR part 305. This is the established generic dose for
all insect pests except pupae and adults of the order Lepidoptera.
While it is true that three of the quarantine pests associated with
fresh pummelo fruit from Thailand are Lepidopteran, irradiation in
conjunction with other mitigations against Lepidopteran pests, can
provide phytosanitary protection for several reasons:
While the treatment is not lethal to pupae and adults of
the order Lepidoptera, it is lethal to larvae. Larvae are of greatest
phytosanitary concern given that they are internal feeders and may
therefore be overlooked upon inspection.
Irradiation tends to prevent normal adult emergence from
the pupal stage.
Irradiation also causes sterility in pupae and emerged
adults, preventing further larval reproduction. Moreover, pupae and
adult Lepidoptera are unlikely to be associated with fresh pummelo
fruit.
The shipments of fresh pummelo fruit from Thailand would also have
to meet all other relevant treatment requirements in part 305.
Packinghouse Procedures
Those plant pests associated with the importation pathway for fresh
pummelo fruit from Thailand that are non-Insecta (XCC, P. citriasiana,
and P. citricarpa), Insecta but not neutralized by irradiation (E.
cendanai and S. baltazari), and the pupae and adult forms of
lepidoptera (C. sagittiferella, P. citri, and P. endocarpa), require
the application of additional mitigations. Prior to packing, the fresh
pummelo fruit would have to be washed, brushed, and disinfested. The
fresh pummelo fruit would also be required to be submerged in a
surfactant, treated for XCC with an APHIS-approved surface
disinfectant, and treated for P. citriasiana and P. citricarpa with an
APHIS-approved fungicide. These packinghouse processing requirements
will ensure that all pests of concern not mitigated by irradiation are
removed from the importation pathway.
Phytosanitary Certificate
A phytosanitary certificate issued by the NPPO of Thailand would
have to accompany each consignment of fresh pummelo fruit. If the fresh
pummelo fruit was irradiated in Thailand, the fresh pummelo fruit would
have to be jointly inspected by APHIS and the NPPO of Thailand, and the
phytosanitary certificate would have to contain additional declarations
attesting to this joint inspection and to the irradiation of the fresh
pummelo fruit in Thailand. If the fresh pummelo fruit will be
irradiated upon arrival in the United States, these additional
declarations would not be needed.
The phytosanitary certificate ensures the fresh pummelo fruit was
inspected by the NPPO of Thailand, and certifies that the fresh pummelo
fruit meets our requirements for export to the continental United
States. Additional declarations provide assurances regarding joint
inspection and proper administration of irradiation treatment.
Port of Entry Inspection
Shipments of fresh pummelo fruit from Thailand would be subject to
inspection at the port of entry. This will provide an additional layer
of phytosanitary protection in order to prevent the dissemination of
plant pests into the continental United States.
Executive Orders 12866 and 13771 and Regulatory Flexibility Act
This proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for
the purposes of Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, has not been
reviewed by the Office of Management and Budget. This proposed rule is
not expected to be an Executive Order 13771 regulatory action because
this proposed rule is not significant under Executive Order 12866.
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 603, we have performed an initial
regulatory flexibility analysis, which is summarized below, regarding
the economic effects of this proposed rule on small entities. Copies of
the full analysis are available by contacting the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT or on the Regulations.gov website (see
ADDRESSES above for instructions for accessing Regulations.gov).
Pummelo is a relatively minor citrus fruit for which there is
limited information. There are no official statistics on the volume or
value of pummelos produced or consumed in the United States.
Agricultural statistics for California report that the area planted in
pummelo and hybrid groves in 2016 totaled 1,587 acres. California
production that year totaled 540,000 boxes, or about 19,595 metric
tons, and had a farm gate value of $9.04 million. The expected volume
of imports from Thailand would be the equivalent of about 1 percent of
California's pummelo production. Unofficially, there are about 100
pummelo growers in California. The majority of these producers likely
operate as small entities, given that this is true for producers of
citrus fruit generally.
Information on pummelo production in Arizona, Florida, or Texas is
not available. U.S. import and export data specific to pummelo are also
not available because pummelo is grouped with grapefruit in Department
of Commerce trade statistics (Harmonized Tariff Schedule 080540).
Based on the information we have, there is no reason to conclude
that adoption of this proposed rule would result in any significant
economic effect on a substantial number of small entities. However, we
do not currently have all of the data necessary for a comprehensive
analysis of the effects of this proposed rule on small entities.
Therefore, we are inviting comments on potential effects. In
particular, we are interested in determining the number and kind of
small entities that may incur benefits or costs from the implementation
of this proposed rule.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule would allow fresh pummelo fruit to be imported
into the continental United States from Thailand under a systems
approach. If this
[[Page 13435]]
proposed rule is adopted, State and local laws and regulations
regarding fresh pummelo fruit imported under this rule would be
preempted while the fruit is in foreign commerce. Fresh fruits are
generally imported for immediate distribution and sale to the consuming
public and would remain in foreign commerce until sold to the ultimate
consumer. The question of when foreign commerce ceases in other cases
must be addressed on a case-by-case basis. If this proposed rule is
adopted, no retroactive effect will be given to this rule, and this
rule will not require administrative proceedings before parties may
file suit in court challenging this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with section 3507(d) of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), reporting and recordkeeping
requirements included in this proposed rule have been submitted for
approval to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB). Please send
comments on the Information Collection Request (ICR) to OMB's Office of
Information and Regulatory Affairs via email to
[email protected], Attention: Desk Officer for APHIS,
Washington, DC 20503. Please state that your comments refer to Docket
No. APHIS-2016-0034. Please send a copy of your comments to the USDA
using one of the methods described under ADDRESSES at the beginning of
this document.
APHIS is proposing to amend the regulations to allow the
importation of fresh pummelo fruit from Thailand into the continental
United States. As a condition of entry, fresh pummelo fruit from
Thailand would be subject to a systems approach that would include
irradiation treatment, packinghouse processing requirements, and port
of entry inspection. The fruit would also be required to be imported in
commercial consignments and accompanied by a phytosanitary certificate
issued by the NPPO of Thailand. This action would allow for the
importation of fresh pummelo fruit from Thailand while continuing to
provide protection against the introduction of plant pests into the
continental United States.
Implementing this information collection will require respondents
to complete phytosanitary certificates and port of entry inspections.
We are soliciting comments from the public (as well as affected
agencies) concerning our proposed information collection and
recordkeeping requirements. These comments will help us:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed information collection is
necessary for the proper performance of our agency's functions,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of our estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the information collection on those who
are to respond (such as through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology; e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses).
Estimate of burden: Public reporting burden for this collection of
information is estimated to average 0.67 hours per response.
Respondents: Foreign businesses and the NPPO of Thailand.
Estimated annual number of respondents: 2.
Estimated annual number of responses per respondent: 18.
Estimated annual number of responses: 36.
Estimated total annual burden on respondents: 24 hours. (Due to
averaging, the total annual burden hours may not equal the product of
the annual number of responses multiplied by the reporting burden per
response.)
A copy of the information collection may be viewed on the
Regulations.gov website or in our reading room. (A link to
Regulations.gov and information on the location and hours of the
reading room are provided under the heading ADDRESSES at the beginning
of this proposed rule.) Copies can also be obtained from Ms. Kimberly
Hardy, APHIS' Information Collection Coordinator, at (301) 851-2483.
APHIS will respond to any ICR-related comments in the final rule. All
comments will also become a matter of public record.
E-Government Act Compliance
The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service is committed to
compliance with the E-Government Act to promote the use of the internet
and other information technologies, to provide increased opportunities
for citizen access to Government information and services, and for
other purposes. For information pertinent to E-Government Act
compliance related to this proposed rule, please contact Ms. Kimberly
Hardy, APHIS' Information Collection Coordinator, at (301) 851-2483.
Lists of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 319
Coffee, Cotton, Fruits, Imports, Logs, Nursery stock, Plant
diseases and pests, Quarantine, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Rice, Vegetables.
Accordingly, we are proposing to amend 7 CFR part 319 as follows:
PART 319--FOREIGN QUARANTINE NOTICES
0
1. The authority citation for part 319 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701-7772, and 7781-7786; 21 U.S.C. 136
and 136a; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
0
2. Section 319.56-83 is added to read as follows:
Sec. 319.56-83 Pummelo From Thailand.
Fresh pummelo fruit (Citrus maxima (Burm.) Merr.) (Rutaceae) may be
imported into the continental United States from Thailand under the
following conditions:
(a) Commercial consignments. The fresh pummelo fruit must be
shipped in commercial consignments only.
(b) Irradiation treatment. The fresh pummelo fruit must be treated
with irradiation in accordance with part 305 of this chapter.
(c) Packinghouse procedures. Prior to packing, the fresh pummelo
fruit must be washed, brushed, disinfested, submerged in surfactant,
treated for Xanthomonas citri Gabriel et al. with an APHIS-approved
surface disinfectant, and treated for Phyllosticta citriasiana and
Phyllosticta citricarpa with an APHIS-approved fungicide.
(d) Phytosanitary certificate. Each shipment of fresh pummelo fruit
must be accompanied by a phytosanitary certificate issued by the
national plant protection organization (NPPO) of Thailand. If the fresh
pummelo fruit was irradiated in Thailand, each consignment of fruit
must be inspected jointly in Thailand by APHIS and the NPPO of
Thailand, and the phytosanitary certificate must contain an additional
declaration attesting to irradiation of the fresh pummelo fruit in
accordance with part 305 of this chapter. If the fresh pummelo fruit
will be irradiated upon arrival into the continental United States,
joint inspection in Thailand and an additional declaration on the
phytosanitary certificate are not required.
(e) Port of entry inspection. Consignments of fresh pummelo fruit
from Thailand are subject to inspection
[[Page 13436]]
at ports of entry in the continental United States.
Done in Washington, DC, this 23rd day of March 2018.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2018-06288 Filed 3-28-18; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P