Group Registration of Photographs, 86643-86656 [2016-28706]
Download as PDF
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 231 / Thursday, December 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
(h) Group registration of contributions
to periodicals. Pursuant to the authority
granted by 17 U.S.C. 408(c)(2), the
Register of Copyrights has determined
that a group of contributions to
periodicals may be registered in Class
TX or Class VA with one application,
one filing fee, and the required deposit,
if the following conditions are met:
(1) All the contributions in the group
must be created by the same individual.
(2) The copyright claimant must be
the same person or organization for all
the contributions.
(3) The contributions must not be
works made for hire.
(4) Each work must be first published
as a contribution to a periodical, and all
the contributions must be first
published within a twelve-month period
(e.g., January 1, 2015 through December
31, 2015; February 1, 2015 through
January 31, 2016). For purposes of this
section, a periodical is a collective work
that is issued or intended to be issued
on an established schedule in
successive issues that are intended to be
continued indefinitely. In most cases,
each issue will bear the same title, as
well as numerical or chronological
designations. Examples include
newspapers, magazines, newsletters,
journals, bulletins, annuals, the
proceedings of societies, and other
similar works.
(5) If any of the contributions were
first published before March 1, 1989,
those works must bear a separate
copyright notice, the notice must
contain the copyright owner’s name (or
an abbreviation by which the name can
be recognized, or a generally known
alternative designation for the owner),
and the name that appears in each
notice must be the same.
(6) The applicant must complete and
submit the online application
designated for a group of contributions
to periodicals. The application must
identify each contribution that is
included in the group, including the
date of publication for each contribution
and the periodical in which it was first
published. The application may be
submitted by any of the parties listed in
§ 202.3(c)(1). The application should be
filed in Class TX if a majority of the
contributions predominantly consist of
text, and the application should be filed
in Class VA if a majority of the
contributions predominantly consist of
photographs, illustrations, artwork, or
other works of the visual arts.
(7) The appropriate filing fee, as
required by § 201.3(c) of this chapter,
must be included with the application
or charged to an active deposit account.
(8) The applicant must submit one
copy of each contribution that is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:51 Nov 30, 2016
Jkt 241001
included in the group, either by
submitting the entire issue of the
periodical where the contribution was
first published, the entire section of the
newspaper where it was first published,
or the specific page(s) from the
periodical where the contribution was
first published. The contributions must
be contained in separate electronic files
that comply with § 202.20(b)(2)(iii). The
files must be submitted in Portable
Document Format (PDF) or other
electronic format approved by the
Office, and they must be uploaded to
the electronic registration system,
preferably in a .zip file containing all
the files. The file size for each uploaded
file must not exceed 500 megabytes; the
files may be compressed to comply with
this requirement.
(i) [Reserved]
(j) [Reserved]
(k) [Reserved]
(l) Refusal to register. The Copyright
Office may refuse registration if the
applicant fails to satisfy the
requirements for registering a group of
related works under this section or
§ 202.3(b)(5)–(7), (9), or (10).
(m) Cancellation. If the Copyright
Office issues a registration for a group
of related works and subsequently
determines that the requirements for
that group option have not been met,
and if the claimant fails to cure the
deficiency after being notified by the
Office, the registration may be cancelled
in accordance with § 201.7 of this
chapter.
(n) The scope of a group registration.
When the Office issues a group
registration under paragraph (h) of this
section, the registration covers each
work in the group and each work is
registered as a separate work. For
purposes of registration, the group as a
whole is not considered a compilation,
a collective work, or a derivative work
under sections 101, 103(b), or 504(c)(1)
of title 17 of the United States Code.
Dated: November 22, 2016.
Sarang V. Damle,
General Counsel and Associate Register of
Copyrights.
[FR Doc. 2016–28700 Filed 11–30–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410–30–P
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Copyright Office
37 CFR Parts 201, 202
[Docket No. 2016–10]
Group Registration of Photographs
U.S. Copyright Office, Library
of Congress.
AGENCY:
PO 00000
Frm 00030
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
ACTION:
86643
Notice of proposed rulemaking.
The U.S. Copyright Office is
proposing to update its regulations
governing group registration options for
photographers to encourage broader
participation in the registration system,
increase the efficiency of the registration
process, and create a more robust record
of the claim. First, the Office has created
new online registration applications
specifically designed for group
registrations of published photographs
and group registrations of unpublished
photographs. The proposed rule would
require applicants to use these online
applications, in lieu of any existing
paper application. Applicants will be
allowed to include up to 750
photographs with each application.
Second, the proposal would eliminate
less-efficient forms of registering
photographs that have been adopted
over the years—namely, the pilot
program permitting group registration of
published photographs using the
electronic application designed for
registering a single work, and the option
of registering a number of unpublished
photographs as an ‘‘unpublished
collection.’’ The pilot program for
photographic databases will remain in
effect. Third, the proposed rule will
update the deposit requirement for
group registrations of photographs and
photographic databases by requiring
applicants to submit their works in
digital form.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule
must be made in writing and must be
received in the U.S. Copyright Office no
later than January 3, 2017.
ADDRESSES: For reasons of government
efficiency, the Copyright Office is using
the regulations.gov system for the
submission and posting of public
comments in this proceeding. All
comments are therefore to be submitted
electronically through regulations.gov.
Specific instructions for submitting
comments are available on the
Copyright Office Web site at https://
www.copyright.gov/rulemaking/groupphotographs/. If electronic submission
of comments is not feasible due to lack
of access to a computer and/or the
Internet, please contact the Office using
the contact information below for
special instructions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert J. Kasunic, Associate Register of
Copyrights and Director of Registration
Policy and Practice, or Erik Bertin,
Deputy Director of Registration Policy
and Practice, at 202–707–8040.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S.
Copyright Office (the ‘‘Office’’) is
proposing to amend the regulation that
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\01DEP1.SGM
01DEP1
86644
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 231 / Thursday, December 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
governs the group registration option for
published photographs. In addition, the
Office is proposing to create a new
group registration option for
unpublished photographs. Finally, the
Office is proposing to amend the deposit
requirements for groups of published
photographs and photographic
databases, and is proposing to establish
similar deposit requirements for the
new group option for unpublished
photographs. These proposals are
discussed in more detail below. The
Office invites public comment on each
proposal.
Last year the Office issued a notice of
inquiry concerning the practical and
legal challenges faced by photographers,
graphic artists, and illustrators (referred
to herein as the ‘‘Visual Works
Inquiry’’ 1). See 80 FR 23054 (Apr. 24,
2015). The Office recognized that
photographers, graphic artists, and
illustrators have a broad impact on U.S.
culture, but they face significant
challenges in the digital age. To better
understand these challenges, the Office
requested written comments on how
photographs, graphic artworks, and
illustrations are monetized, licensed,
registered, and enforced under the
Copyright Act of 1976 (‘‘the Copyright
Act’’). The Office sought information
concerning the current marketplace for
these types of works, as well as
observations regarding the real or
potential obstacles that these creators
and their licensees or other
representatives face when navigating the
digital landscape. With respect to
registration, the Office asked the public
to identify the most significant
challenges for photographers and other
visual artists. 80 FR at 23056.
The Office received 2,795 comments
and 166 reply comments in response to
the Visual Works Inquiry. The Office
has not attempted to address these
comments in this notice of proposed
rulemaking.2 The rule proposed in this
notice focuses solely on photographs,
and it represents an interim
improvement to the current electronic
registration system. In the future, the
Office may consider other options as it
assesses the broader concerns of visual
artists generally.
1 Information
concerning the Visual Works
Inquiry is available on the Office’s Web site at
https://copyright.gov/policy/visualworks/.
2 In preparing this notice of proposed rulemaking
the Office did consider comments submitted in a
prior rulemaking concerning the deposit
requirements for photographic databases, which
was completed in July 2012. Information
concerning that rulemaking is available on the
Office’s Web site at https://copyright.gov/
rulemaking/databases/.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:51 Nov 30, 2016
Jkt 241001
I. Background
When Congress enacted the Copyright
Act, it authorized the Register of
Copyrights (the ‘‘Register’’) to specify by
regulation the administrative classes of
works for the purpose of seeking a
registration and the nature of the
deposit required for each such class. In
addition, Congress gave the Register the
discretion to allow groups of related
works to be registered with one
application and one filing fee, a
procedure known as ‘‘group
registration.’’ See 17 U.S.C. 408(c)(1).
Pursuant to this authority, the Register
issued regulations permitting the Office
to issue group registrations for certain
limited categories of works, provided
that certain conditions have been met.
See generally 37 CFR 202.3(b)(5)–(10).
As the legislative history explains,
allowing ‘‘a number of related works to
be registered together as a group
represent[ed] a needed and important
liberalization of the law.’’ H.R. Rep. No.
94–1476, at 154 (1976), reprinted in
1976 U.S.C.C.A.N. 5659, 5770; S. Rep.
No. 94–473, at 136 (1975). Congress
recognized that requiring applicants to
submit separate applications for certain
types of works may be so burdensome
and expensive that authors and
copyright owners may forgo registration
altogether, since copyright registration
is not a prerequisite to copyright
protection. Id. If copyright owners do
not submit their works for registration
under this permissive system, the public
record will not contain any information
concerning those works. This creates a
void in the record that diminishes the
value of the Office’s database.
Congress cited ‘‘a group of
photographs by one photographer’’ as an
example of a ‘‘group of related works’’
that would be suitable for registration
under section 408(c)(1). Id. At the same
time, when large numbers of works are
bundled together in one application,
information about the individual works
may not be adequately captured.
Therefore, group registration options
require careful balancing of the need for
an accurate public record and the need
for an efficient method of facilitating the
registration of multiple photographs.
II. Existing Registration
Accommodations for Photographers
Under the Copyright Office’s existing
regulations and registration practice,
photographers have several options for
registering groups or collections of
photographs with one application and
one filing fee. These options are
summarized below.
PO 00000
Frm 00031
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
A. Group Registration of Published
Photographs
After conducting an extensive
rulemaking, the Office issued a
regulation in 2001 that allows
applicants to register a group of
published photographs with one
application and one filing fee. See 66 FR
37142, 37149–50 (July 17, 2001). The
Office refers to this procedure as the
‘‘group option for published
photographs’’ or ‘‘GRPPH.’’
An applicant may register a group of
photographs under this procedure if all
the photographs were taken by the same
photographer and were published
within the same calendar year, and if
the copyright claimant for all the
photographs is the same person or
organization. 37 CFR 202.3(b)(10)(i)–
(iii). If the photographs were created as
works made for hire, the application
must provide both the name of the
photographer and the name of the
photographer’s employer or the party
who specially ordered or commissioned
the photographs (e.g., ‘‘ABC
Corporation, employer for hire of John
Doe’’). Id. § 202.3(b)(10)(ix).
As a general rule, the applicant must
provide a precise date of publication for
each photograph in the group (i.e.,
month, day, and year), either by
providing the date on the application,
on a continuation sheet submitted on
Form GR/PPh/CON,3 on a separate list
submitted on paper or in a text file, or
on the photographs themselves (e.g.,
writing the date on the back of each
print, including the date in the file
name for each image, etc.). Id.
§ 202.3(b)(10)(iv)(A)–(D). Alternatively,
the applicant may provide a range of
dates (e.g., February 25, 2015 through
May 25, 2015), but only if the
photographs were published within
three months before the date that the
application is received in the Office. Id.
§ 202.3(b)(10)(vi). If the applicant
chooses to provide publication
information on Form GR/PPh/CON, the
applicant may include up to 750
photographs in the claim. Id.
§ 202.3(b)(10)(v). By contrast, if the
applicant provides publication
information using any other method,
there is no limit on the number of
photographs that may be submitted. Id.
§ 202.3(b)(10)(v), (viii).
Initially, all applicants were required
to file their claims using a paper
application submitted on Form VA. As
discussed below in Section III.A.1, the
Office has established a pilot program
3 Form GR/PPh/CON is a continuation sheet for
Form VA specifically designed for providing
information for a group registration of published
photographs.
E:\FR\FM\01DEP1.SGM
01DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 231 / Thursday, December 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
that allows applicants to submit their
claims through the electronic
registration system. Id.
§ 202.3(b)(10)(xi).
In all cases, the applicant must submit
one copy of each photograph that is
included in the group, and all the
photographs must be submitted in the
same format. Id. § 202.3(b)(10)(x). The
applicant may submit the photographs
in digital form by saving them on a CD–
ROM or DVD–ROM in a JPEG, GIF,
TIFF, or PCD format.4 Alternatively, the
applicant may submit the photographs
in a physical form, such as prints,
contact sheets, slides, photocopies, or
even videotape. Id.
§ 202.20(c)(2)(xx)(B)–(H).
B. Other Registration Options
In addition to the group option for
published photographs, there are four
other options for registering multiple
photographs with the same application.
These options are summarized below.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
1. Unpublished Collections
Since 1978 the Office has allowed
applicants to register a number of
unpublished works with one
application and one filing fee if the
works qualify as an ‘‘unpublished
collection.’’ To qualify for this option,
the works must be unpublished, the
works must have at least one common
author, the copyright claimant for each
work and the collection as a whole must
be the same person or organization, the
works must be assembled in an orderly
form, and the applicant must provide a
single title identifying the collection as
a whole. Id. § 203.3(b)(4)(i)(B).
Photographers may use this option to
register their photographs if they satisfy
these requirements, and at the present
time there is no limit on the number of
photographs that may be included
within each collection. Under this
option, the applicant may register the
works using the electronic registration
system or a paper application submitted
on Form VA. Id. § 202.3(b)(2).
In all cases, the applicant must submit
one copy of each photograph that is
included in the collection. The
applicant may submit the photographs
in digital form (e.g., uploading digital
files to the electronic registration system
or mailing them to the Office on a CD–
ROM or DVD–ROM, etc.) or physical
form (e.g., prints, slides, photocopies,
etc.), but all of the photographs must be
submitted in the same format. Id.
§ 202.20(c)(2)(xx).
4 The regulation that currently governs the
deposit requirements for GRPPH does not mention
other types of storage devices, such as flash drives.
37 CFR 202.20(c)(2)(xx)(A).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:51 Nov 30, 2016
Jkt 241001
2. Group Registration for Contributions
to Periodicals
Without prejudice to the Register’s
general authority to create group
registration options under Section
408(c)(2) at the Register’s discretion,
Congress also directed the Register to
create a group option for works by the
same individual author that were first
published as a contribution to a
periodical. 17 U.S.C. 408(c)(2). In
response to this directive, the Office
established a procedure known as the
‘‘group option for contributions to
periodicals’’ or ‘‘GRCP.’’ See 43 FR 965,
966–67 (Jan. 5, 1978). Photographers
may use this option to register their
photographs if they satisfy the
requirements set forth in the regulation.
First, all the photographs must be taken
by the same individual, and none of
them can be a work made for hire. 37
CFR 202.3(b)(8)(i)(A)–(B). Second, all
the photographs must be first published
as a contribution to a periodical (e.g., a
newspaper, a magazine, a journal, etc.)
and they must be published within a
twelve-month period (e.g., June 1, 2014
through May 31, 2015). Id.
§ 202.3(b)(8)(i)(C) & n.2. And, third, if
the photographs were first published
before March 1, 1989, each photograph
must contain an appropriate copyright
notice. Id. § 202.3(b)(8)(i)(D).
Under the current regulation, there is
no limit on the number of photographs
that may be registered under GRCP. The
applicant must complete a paper
application using Form VA and Form
GR/CP.5 Id. § 202.3(b)(8)(ii)(A)–(B). The
applicant must submit the photographs
in the precise form in which they were
first published, and the copies must be
submitted in physical—rather than
digital—form. See id. § 202.3(b)(8)(i)(E).
For example, the applicant may submit
the entire issue of the periodical that
contains the photograph, the entire
section of the newspaper that contains
the photograph, a photocopy of the
entire page from the periodical that
contains the photograph, among other
formats.6 See id.
3. Group Registration for Photographic
Databases
In 1989, the Office created a
procedure that allows database owners
5 Form GR/CP is an adjunct form specifically
designed for providing information for a group
registration of contributions to periodicals.
6 The Office is issuing a separate notice of
proposed rulemaking (published elsewhere in this
volume of the Federal Register, and referred to
herein as the ‘‘GRCP Rulemaking’’) that invites
comment on a proposed rule that will modify the
group option for contributions to periodicals. To be
clear, the Office is not proposing any changes to the
GRCP regulation as part of this rulemaking on group
registration of photographs.
PO 00000
Frm 00032
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
86645
to register the updates and revisions to
a database with one application and one
filing fee. 37 CFR 202.3(b)(5); 54 FR
13177 (Mar. 31, 1989). The Office refers
to this procedure as the ‘‘group database
option.’’ In the late 1990s, some stock
photography companies began using
this option to register databases that
contain large numbers of photographs.
After consulting with representatives
from the industry, the Office concluded
that the database option could
potentially be used to register a
photographic database if certain
requirements have been met. The Office
noted this understanding in an earlier
notice of proposed rulemaking that is
discussed in Section III.A.1 below. See
76 FR 4072, 4075–76 (Jan. 24, 2011).
The requirements for the database
option are extremely complex.7 Briefly
stated, an applicant may register the
updates or revisions that were made to
a database over a period of three months
if the updates and revisions are owned
by the same claimant and if the general
content and organization of the updates
and revisions are similar. 37 CFR
202.3(b)(5). The applicant must submit
a detailed statement that describes the
content and organization of the
database, and in the case of a
photographic database, the applicant
must submit one copy of each
photograph that is included in the
group. The applicant may submit an
online application or a paper
application. The applicant may submit
the photographs in digital or physical
form, but all the photographs must be
submitted in the same format. 37 CFR
202.20(c)(2)(xx).
A registration for a photographic
database covers the authorship involved
in selecting, coordinating, and arranging
the content of the database as a whole.
It also may cover the individual
photographs that are included within
the database if the photographers
transferred the exclusive rights in their
respective works to the owner of the
database, and if the selection,
coordination, and/or arrangement of
those photographs is sufficiently
creative. See Compendium section
1117.2. That said, the Office has
questioned whether this practice should
be revised to limit the examination of a
database to the authorship involved in
creating the selection, coordination, and
arrangement of the database as a whole
and to exclude examination (and thus,
the prima facie validity) of a claim in
the component elements of the database.
7 For a detailed summary of these requirements,
see section 1117 of the Compendium of U.S.
Copyright Office Practices, Third Edition
(hereinafter the ‘‘Compendium’’).
E:\FR\FM\01DEP1.SGM
01DEP1
86646
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 231 / Thursday, December 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
See 77 FR 40268, 40269 (July 9, 2012);
see also 76 FR at 4073. The Office
generally discourages photographers
from registering their works as part of a
photographic database and instead
encourages them to use one of the other
options discussed in this section, in
part, because they provide a better
registration record for claims in the
individual component works within a
database, as opposed to a claim in the
database itself as a compilation of data.
See 77 FR at 40269 n.1; 76 FR at 4073.
Moreover, registering photographs as
part of a photographic database may
limit the copyright owner’s ability to
seek certain remedies in an
infringement action. This issue is
discussed in more detail in Section
III.G.3 below.
4. Collective Works
Applicants may register a number of
photographs with one application and
one filing fee if they are part of a
collective work. The statute defines a
collective work as ‘‘a work, such as a
periodical issue, anthology, or
encyclopedia, in which a number of
contributions, constituting separate and
independent works in themselves, are
assembled into a collective whole.’’ 17
U.S.C. 101. A collective work may
consist entirely of photographs, such as
a book of photographs, an exhibition
catalog, or a retrospective book that
contains photographs taken by a
particular photographer. A collective
work also may combine photographs
with other types of authorship, such as
a calendar, textbook, coffee table book,
or similar types of works.
Applicants may register a collective
work with an online application or a
paper application. The claim may
include photographs taken by multiple
photographers, but the applicant does
not need to name each photographer in
the application and there is no limit on
the number of photographs that may be
included within each claim. If the claim
is approved, the registration will cover
the authorship involved in selecting,
coordinating, and arranging the content
of the collective work as a whole. It also
may cover the individual photographs
that are included within the collective
work if (i) the claimant owns the
copyright in both the individual
photographs and the collective work as
a whole, and if (ii) the photographs have
not previously been published or
registered. Although a registration for a
collective work may cover the
individual photographs contained
therein, this type of registration may
limit the copyright owner’s ability to
seek certain remedies in an
infringement action. This issue is
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:51 Nov 30, 2016
Jkt 241001
discussed in more detail in Section
III.G.4 below.
III. The Proposed Rule
The Proposed Rule does several
things. First, the Office is proposing to
amend the regulation that governs the
group option for published photographs
to reflect certain technical upgrades that
will be made to the electronic
registration system. Second, the Office
is proposing to create, for the first time,
an equivalent group registration option
for unpublished photographs. This new
procedure will be known as the ‘‘group
option for unpublished photographs’’ or
‘‘GRUPH,’’ and it will replace the option
that currently allows photographers to
register their works as an unpublished
collection. These first two amendments
will increase the efficiency of the
registration process for both published
and unpublished photographs alike by
requiring applicants to submit their
claims through the electronic
registration system. In addition, GRUPH
will foster early registration, thereby
eliminating complex questions that arise
when published and unpublished
photographs are commingled.
Third, the Office is proposing to
update the deposit requirements for the
group options for published
photographs and photographic
databases by requiring applicants to
submit a digital copy of each
photograph that is included in the
group, and a separate document
containing a sequentially numbered list
that provides the title and file name for
each photograph in the group.
Applicants may submit these items by
uploading them through the electronic
system or by sending them on a physical
storage device. This same requirement
will apply to the new group option for
unpublished photographs.
Finally, the Proposed Rule will
memorialize the Office’s longstanding
position regarding the scope of a group
registration for photographs.
Each of these proposals is discussed
below.8
8 As mentioned above in footnote 6, the Office is
issuing a separate notice of proposed rulemaking
involving the group option for contributions to
periodicals. The rule proposed in the GRCP
Rulemaking states that the Office may refuse to
issue a group registration or may cancel a group
registration if it determines that the applicant failed
to comply with the relevant requirements for a
particular group option. These requirements will
apply to any group option that the Office creates
under section 408 of the Copyright Act, including
GRCP, GRPPH, GRUPH, and the group option for
photographic databases.
PO 00000
Frm 00033
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
A. Application Requirements for Groups
of Published Photographs (GRPPH) and
Groups of Unpublished Photographs
(GRUPH)
1. Online Registration
In February 2015 the Office
completed a comprehensive analysis of
its electronic registration system with
input from technical experts and
stakeholders. This analysis will support
the Office’s long-term goals of creating
both a better interface and a better
public record. See U.S. Copyright
Office, Office of the Chief Information
Officer, Report and Recommendations
of the Technical Upgrades Special
Project Team (February 2015), available
at https://copyright.gov/docs/
technical_upgrades/uscotechnicalupgrades.pdf; see also
Technological Upgrades to Registration
and Recordation Functions, 78 FR
17722 (Mar. 22, 2013). In December
2015, the Register issued a strategic plan
that sets forth the Office’s performance
objectives for the next five years. The
plan provides a roadmap for reenvisioning almost all of the services
that the Office provides, including how
applicants register claims, submit
deposits, record documents, share data,
and access expert resources. With
respect to information technology, the
plan calls for ‘‘a robust and flexible
technology enterprise that is dedicated
to the current and future needs of a
modern copyright agency.’’ U.S.
Copyright Office, Strategic Plan 2016–
2020: Positioning the United States
Copyright Office for the Future, at 35
(Dec. 1, 2015), available at https://
copyright.gov/reports/strategic-plan/
USCO-strategic.pdf. At the direction of
Congress,9 the Office also developed a
detailed IT plan, and obtained public
comments on specific strategies, costs,
and timelines for technology objectives.
U.S. Copyright Office, Provisional
Information Technology Modernization
Plan and Cost Analysis (Feb. 29, 2016),
available at https://copyright.gov/
reports/itplan/.
In the meantime, the Office has made
some enhancements to the current
electronic registration system that will
benefit photographers, the Office, and
the public at large. When the electronic
registration system was introduced in
2007, it contained a ‘‘standard’’
application (referred to herein as the
‘‘standard online application’’).
Applicants could use this application to
register a single work; they also could
use this application to register a number
of works as an unpublished collection
or as part of a collective work. See 72
9 H.R.
E:\FR\FM\01DEP1.SGM
Rep. No. 114–110, at 16–17 (2015).
01DEP1
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 231 / Thursday, December 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
FR 36883, 36885 (July 6, 2007). But the
standard online application was not
meant to be used to register groups of
published photographs, photographic
databases, or contributions to
periodicals, because the system was not
designed to take in the information
required for a group claim. Instead,
photographers were required to submit
these types of claims using a paper
application submitted on Form VA
(either alone or together with Form GR/
PPh/CON or Form GR/CP).
Photographers soon expressed interest
in using the electronic system, and
beginning in 2010, some applicants
began submitting large numbers of
photographs with the standard online
application. Although this application
was not designed to handle group
registrations, the Visual Arts Division
processed some of these claims in cases
where the application contained all the
information required for a group claim.
Based on this experience, the Office
issued an interim regulation in 2011
that established a pilot program
allowing applicants to register groups of
published photographs and
photographic databases with the
standard online application.10 76 FR at
4074, 4075. Applicants that participate
in the pilot program may submit their
claims through the electronic system
(rather than submitting a paper
application), provided that they obtain
prior authorization from the Visual Arts
Division and follow the instructions
from that Division concerning the
information that should be included in
the application and the proper method
for submitting the deposit. 37 CFR
202.3(b)(5)(ii)(A), (b)(10)(xi).
The Office explained that, during the
pilot, it would assess the desirability
and feasibility of allowing applicants to
submit groups of photographs through
the electronic system on a permanent
basis, and invited public comment on
the issue. 76 FR 5106 (Jan. 28, 2011).
The Professional Photographers of
America (‘‘PPA’’) and other
organizations that represent
photographers supported the pilot
program, predicting that the standard
online application would require less
time to complete than a paper
application, and that applicants would
receive their certificates in a more
timely manner.11
10 The pilot program does not apply to the group
option for contributions to periodicals.
11 PPA at 2, available at https://copyright.gov/
rulemaking/databases/comments/professionalphotographers-of-america.pdf. PPA jointly
submitted its comments with Commercial
Photographers International, the Society of Sport &
Event Photographers, the Student Photographic
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:51 Nov 30, 2016
Jkt 241001
While the pilot program was wellintentioned, it has been extremely
burdensome for both applicants and the
Office. The standard online application
was designed to handle claims
involving one work or a limited number
of works. Using the existing architecture
to provide title and publication
information for hundreds or even
thousands of photographs is necessarily
challenging for applicants who are
unfamiliar with the system. Examining
these types of claims also requires
significantly more time. In some cases,
registration specialists have spent an
entire day processing a single claim,
which has resulted in corresponding
delays in issuing certificates of
registration for such claims. Moreover,
the increasing demand on the Office’s
limited resources has had an adverse
effect on the examination of other types
of works within the Visual Arts
Division.
To address these concerns, the Office
has decided to eliminate the pilot
program for published photographs, and
replace it with an online application
specifically designed for groups of
published photographs. (The pilot
program for photographic databases will
remain in effect for the time being,
though as discussed in Sections D.2 and
G.3, the deposit requirements for
photographic databases will be modified
in some respects.) In addition, the Office
has created a new online application
specifically designed for groups of
unpublished photographs.
Under the Proposed Rule, applicants
will be required to use the online
application designated for GRPPH or
GRUPH as a condition for using either
of these group options. To facilitate this
transition, the Office will contact each
applicant that has participated in the
pilot program for published
photographs and will notify them that
the pilot program will be replaced with
a new procedure. The Office will
provide instructions on how to
complete the new applications on its
Web site and in chapter 1100 of the
Compendium. In addition, the Office
will make its staff available to groups or
associations that are interested in
producing webinars or other
educational programs for their members.
Once the Proposed Rule goes into
effect, the Office will no longer accept
groups of published photographs or
groups of unpublished photographs that
are submitted with a paper application
on Form VA (either with or without
Society, Evidence Photographers International
Council, and the Stock Artists Alliance. Id. at 1.
PO 00000
Frm 00034
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
86647
Form GR/PPh/CON).12 Likewise, the
Office will no longer accept these types
of claims if they are submitted with a
standard online application, rather than
the online application designated for
GRPPH or GRUPH.13 In such cases the
Office will ask the applicant to resubmit
the photographs using the appropriate
application, which may affect the
effective date of registration that is
assigned to the claim. The Office invites
comment on this proposal, including
whether it should eliminate the paper
application for these group options,
phase them out after a specified period
of time, or continue to offer them for
photographers who prefer to use the
paper-based system.
2. Relationship to Supplementary
Registration Rulemaking
A supplementary registration is a
special type of registration that may be
used ‘‘to correct an error in a copyright
registration or to amplify the
information given in a registration,’’
including a registration for a group of
related works. 17 U.S.C. 408(d).
Specifically, it identifies an error or
omission in an existing registration
(referred to herein as a ‘‘basic
registration’’) and places the corrected
information or additional information in
the public record. The Office refers to
this type of registration as a ‘‘CA,’’
which stands for ‘‘correction and
amplification.’’
The Office is issuing a separate notice
of proposed rulemaking (published
elsewhere in this volume of the Federal
Register, and referred to herein as the
‘‘CA Rulemaking’’) that will modify the
regulation that governs this procedure.
Under the rule proposed in the CA
Rulemaking, applicants will be required
to file an online application in order to
correct or amplify the information set
forth in a basic registration for any
photograph that is capable of being
registered through the electronic
system—even if the work was originally
registered with a paper application
submitted on Form VA (either with or
without Form GR/PPh/CON).
12 By contrast, Applicants may continue to use
Form VA to register a photographic database if they
meet the eligibility requirements for that option.
Similarly, photographers may continue to use Form
VA to register an individual photograph or a
collective work, although the Office strongly
encourages applicants to use the online application
rather than the paper form.
13 By contrast, applicants may continue to use the
standard online application to register a
photographic database, as long as they comply with
the requirements for the pilot program.
Photographers may continue to use the standard
application to register photographs as part of a
collective work. Likewise, photographers may
continue to use the standard online application to
register an individual photograph.
E:\FR\FM\01DEP1.SGM
01DEP1
86648
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 231 / Thursday, December 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
If the rules proposed in the CA
Rulemaking and in this proceeding both
go into effect, applicants will be
required to file an online application in
order to correct or amplify a basic
registration for works registered under
the GRPPH and GRUPH options. If an
applicant attempts to use a paper
application, the Office will ask the
applicant to resubmit the claim using
the online form. As discussed in Section
III.C.1 below, if the basic registration
encompasses more than 750
photographs, multiple applications may
need to be submitted to correct or
amplify that registration. Applicants
will not need to contact the Visual Arts
Division in order to correct or amplify
a basic registration for a group of
photographs registered under GRPPH or
GRUPH.
This online-filing requirement will
also apply when correcting or
amplifying a basic registration for works
registered under the pilot program for
group registration option for
photographic databases.14 Applicants
will need to contact the Visual Arts
Division before filing an application to
correct or amplify a basic registration for
a photographic database. This is due to
the fact a supplementary registration for
a photographic database will have to be
submitted under the pilot program. As
discussed in Section III.A.1, the Visual
Arts Division closely monitors claims
submitted under this program to ensure
that applicants complete the online
application in an appropriate manner.
Comments concerning this proposal
should be submitted as part of the CA
Rulemaking, and should not be
submitted as part of this rulemaking on
group registration of photographs.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
3. Policy Considerations Supporting
Online-Only Registration
A substantial majority of the U.S.
population has access to the internet,15
and the Office expects that most
photographers will be able to use the
electronic system.16 That said, the
14 Under the rule proposed in the CA Rulemaking,
the online filing requirement for supplementary
registrations will also apply to basic registrations
for a single photograph, a collection of unpublished
photographs, or a collective work that contains
photographs.
15 The Pew Research Center found that 84% of
adults use the internet, including 85% of the people
in urban and suburban communities and 78% of the
people in rural communities. Pew Research Center,
Americans’ Internet Access: 2000–2015, at 2, 10
(June 26, 2015), available at https://
www.pewinternet.org/files/2015/06/2015-0626_internet-usage-across-demographicsdiscover_FINAL.pdf.
16 Approximately 94% of the claims submitted in
fiscal year 2015 were filed through the electronic
system, while 6% of the claims were submitted on
a paper application.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:51 Nov 30, 2016
Jkt 241001
Office recognizes that millions of
Americans do not have broadband
service, and that the Proposed Rule may
impose a burden on photographers who
fall within this segment of the
population.17 Nevertheless, the Office
believes that the benefits of requiring
applicants to use the online application
designated for GRPPH or GRUPH
outweigh the potential burden on
photographers who do not have direct
access to the internet.
As discussed above, the PPA and
other organizations that represent
photographers expressed support for
online registration in a prior
rulemaking. They stated that ‘‘only a
tiny fraction of photographers (1%
according to PPA member surveys)’’
register their works with the Office, in
part, because the paper application
takes too much time to complete. PPA,
supra note 11, at 1. Thus, requiring
applicants to use the online application
will encourage broader participation in
the registration process.
If a photographer does not have
broadband at home, at the home of a
relative, friend, or neighbor, or at her
place of employment, there are other
options for registering large numbers of
published or unpublished photographs.
If the copyright owner has a tablet or
laptop, she could complete and submit
the online application at a coffee shop,
a bookstore, or any other place where
wi-fi or cellular service is available.18
She could log onto the electronic system
at a public library or other institution
that provides computers with internet
17 The Federal Communications Commission
(‘‘FCC’’) reported that 17% of the population does
not have access to a broadband service with
connection speeds of twenty-five megabits per
second (‘‘mbps’’) for downloads and three mbps for
uploads. This figure includes 8% of the people who
live in urban areas, 53% of the people in rural
areas, and 63% of the people in U.S. territories and
Tribal lands. Federal Communications Commission,
2015 Broadband Progress Report at 4 (Jan. 29, 2015),
available at https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/
attachmatch/FCC-15-10A1.pdf.
18 When filing an application for a supplementary
registration there is no need to upload a copy of the
work that is covered by the basic registration. Thus,
applicants will be able to submit these types of
claims with a tablet or other wi-fi enabled device.
In some cases, the registration specialist may need
to compare the information provided in the
application for supplementary registration with the
copy of the work that was submitted with the
application for the basic registration. For instance,
this may be necessary if the supplementary
registration changes the publication status of the
work or adds additional authors to the registration
record. If the Office does not have a copy of the
work in its possession, the registration specialist
may ask the applicant to submit a replacement
copy. See Compendium section 1802.9(C). But in all
cases, the replacement copy could be sent by first
class mail, courier, or hand delivery; the copy does
not need to be uploaded to the electronic system
(though this would be an option if the applicant has
broadband service).
PO 00000
Frm 00035
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
access. Although the photographer
would have to submit the application
through the electronic system and pay
the filing fee through a secure Web site
(www.pay.gov), she would not
necessarily have to submit her
photographs over the internet. As
discussed in Section III.D.1.c, the
photographer could save her
photographs onto a flash drive or other
storage device and mail it to the Office
with the required shipping slip that is
generated by the electronic registration
system.
In the alternative, the photographer
could hire an attorney to submit the
application on her behalf, either by
paying for the attorney’s services or by
obtaining pro bono representation.19
The Office also notes that a number of
companies will prepare an application
and file it with the Office for a fee.
These companies typically provide this
service for copyright owners who wish
to register a single work, but they could
conceivably expand their offering to
include groups of photographs.
The Office’s decision to offer a group
option for photographers is entirely
discretionary, and Congress gave the
Office broad authority to set the
requirements for these types of claims.
17 U.S.C. 408(c)(1). For the foregoing
reasons, the Office believes that
requiring applicants to submit an online
application as a condition for seeking a
group registration for a group of
photographs is a reasonable trade-off for
improving the overall efficiency of the
group registration process. Nonetheless,
the Office invites comment on this
aspect of the Proposed Rule.
B. Filing Fee for GRPPH and GRUPH
The filing fee for registering groups of
published or unpublished photographs
will be $55, which is the amount the
Office currently charges for a group of
published photographs submitted with
an online application under the pilot
program.20 37 CFR 201.3(c)(3)(i).
In 2012 the Office conducted a study
pursuant to section 708 of the Copyright
Act, which authorizes the Register to
establish, adjust, and recover fees for
certain services that the Office provides
19 The Office does not require applications to be
prepared or submitted by an attorney. In certain
special cases the Office may suggest that the
copyright owner consider seeking legal advice, but
the Office does not furnish the names of copyright
attorneys, publishers, agents, or other similar
information. See 37 CFR 201.2(a)(2).
20 Likewise, the filing fee for registering a
photographic database will remain unchanged.
Applicants will continue to pay $55 if the claim is
submitted with an online application under the
pilot program, and will continue to pay $65 if the
claim is submitted with a paper application on
Form VA. 37 CFR 201.3(c)(3).
E:\FR\FM\01DEP1.SGM
01DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 231 / Thursday, December 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
to the public. Initially, the Office
proposed to increase the filing fee for a
group of published photographs, but
after weighing the concerns expressed
by photographers the Office decided to
keep the fee for submitting an online
application under the pilot program at
$55 and the fee for submitting a paper
application at $65. The Office noted that
photographers ‘‘expressed significant
concern about the impact of fees on
their ability to protect their works,’’
given ‘‘the number of works they
produce and must register in order to
receive the full range of judicial
remedies for infringement.’’ U.S.
Copyright Office, Proposed Schedule
and Analysis of Copyright Fees To Go
Into Effect On Or About April 1, 2014,
at 15 (Nov. 14, 2013), available at https://
www.copyright.gov/docs/newfees/
USCOFeeStudy-Nov13.pdf.
Section 708(b) authorizes the Register
to adjust the fees that the Office charges
for certain services (including the fee for
seeking a group registration), but before
doing so the Register must conduct a
study of the costs incurred by the Office
for registering claims, recording
documents, and providing other
services. In conducting this study, the
Register must consider the timing of any
fee adjustments and the Office’s
authority to use the fees consistent with
its budget. 17 U.S.C. 708(b)(1). Section
708(b) provides that the Register may
adjust these fees no ‘‘more than that
necessary to cover the reasonable costs
incurred by the Copyright Office for
. . . [such services], plus a reasonable
inflation adjustment to account for any
estimated increase in costs.’’ 17 U.S.C.
708(b)(2). It also provides that the Office
must submit a proposed fee schedule to
Congress and that the Office may
implement the schedule 120 days
thereafter (unless Congress enacts a law
stating that it does not approve the
schedule). 17 U.S.C. 708(b)(5).
Once the Proposed Rule has been
implemented, the Office will monitor
the cost of processing groups of
published and unpublished
photographs to determine if future fee
adjustments may be warranted. The
Office will use this information in
conducting its next fee study.
C. Eligibility Requirements for GRPPH
and GRUPH
This section discusses the eligibility
requirements for the group option for
published photographs and the group
option for unpublished photographs.
Applicants that fail to satisfy these
requirements will not be permitted to
use these options.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:51 Nov 30, 2016
Jkt 241001
1. Photographs That May Be Included in
the Group
Among the key requirements of the
Proposed Rule are that all the works in
the group must be photographs, the
group must contain no more than 750
photographs, and the applicant must
specify the total number of photographs
that are included in the group. These
requirements must be satisfied,
regardless of whether the applicant uses
the group option for published or
unpublished photographs.
This represents a change in policy.
Under the current regulation, applicants
may register a group of published
photographs by submitting a paper
application on Form VA and may use
Form GR/PPh/CON to provide titles,
publication dates, and other pertinent
information for each photograph.
Completing Form GR/PPh/CON is
optional, although it does provide
certain advantages. See Compendium
section 1116.2. When using Form GR/
PPh/CON, the applicant may only
include up to 750 photographs in each
group. By contrast, if the applicant uses
any other method for submitting a group
of published photographs—such as
completing the standard online
application under the pilot program or
submitting a paper application on Form
VA without completing Form GR/PPh/
CON—there is no limit on the number
of photographs that may be included in
the group. Likewise, when an applicant
submits a number of photographs as an
unpublished collection under
§ 202.3(b)(4)(i)(B), there is no limit on
the number of photographs that may be
included in the claim (regardless of
whether the applicant submits the claim
through the electronic system or with a
paper application).
The Office recognizes that
photographers are prolific creators. A
photographer may take dozens or even
hundreds of copyrightable images in a
single session and thousands of images
over the course of a week, a month, or
a year. The Office created a group
option for photographs, in part, because
it is unrealistic and cost-prohibitive to
expect photographers to register all of
their images on an individual basis. At
the same time, the Office recognizes that
an effective public record must provide
sufficient information about each claim.
Photographers who register their works
in a timely manner may be entitled to
claim statutory damages in an
infringement action and the granularity
of the public record is critical to that
determination.
Given resource limitations and the
modest filing fee for this group option,
the Office must impose some limit on
PO 00000
Frm 00036
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
86649
the total number of photographs that
may be submitted under the group
option for published photographs and
the new option for unpublished
photographs. Based on its experience
with Form GR/PPh/CON, the Office has
determined that a limit of 750
photographs strikes an appropriate
balance between the interests of
photographers and the administrative
capabilities of the Office.
To ensure that applicants do not
attempt to circumvent the 750photograph limit the Office proposes to
eliminate the pilot program that allows
applicants to submit groups of
published photographs with the
standard online application.21 If an
applicant submits more than 750
photographs or fails to use the online
application designated for GRPPH, the
Office will ask the applicant to resubmit
the claim using the appropriate
application and will ask the applicant to
limit the claim to no more than 750
photographs.
For the same reason, the Office will
no longer register a group of
unpublished photographs as an
unpublished collection. If an applicant
submits more than 750 photographs or
fails to use the online application
designated for GRUPH, the Office will
ask the applicant to resubmit the claim
using the appropriate application and
will ask the applicant to limit the
number of photographs in the group.
The limit on the number of
photographs, in turn, will affect the
procedure for correcting or amplifying a
basic registration for a group of
published photographs. As noted in
Section III.A.2, the rule proposed in the
CA rulemaking will require applicants
to file an online application in order to
seek a supplementary registration for a
group of photographs. If the basic
registration covers 750 photographs or
fewer, the applicant will be able to
correct or amplify the registration record
with a single supplementary registration
submitted through the online system.
But if the basic registration was issued
before the Proposed Rule goes into
effect, and if that registration covers
more than 750 photographs, multiple
supplementary registrations may be
needed to correct or amplify the record
for those works.
2. Authorship and Ownership
Another key requirement is that all
the photographs in the group must be
taken by the same photographer.
21 The Proposed Rule only eliminates the pilot
program for GRPPH. As discussed in Section III.A.1,
the pilot program for photographic databases will
remain in effect for the time being.
E:\FR\FM\01DEP1.SGM
01DEP1
86650
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 231 / Thursday, December 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Applicants will not be allowed to
submit groups of photographs taken by
different photographers (e.g., 300
photographs by Raul Martinez, 300
photographs by Jose Rodriguez, and 150
photographs by Diego Hernandez).
Likewise, the Office will not accept
applications claiming that two or more
individuals jointly created each
photograph in the group as a joint
work.22 These requirements are
consistent with the regulation that
currently governs GRPPH. See 37 CFR
202.3(b)(10)(ii).
In all cases, the claim will be limited
to ‘‘photographs’’ and that term will be
added automatically to the application
by the electronic system. The system
will not accept claims in ‘‘digital
editing,’’ ‘‘compilation,’’ or any other
form of authorship other than
‘‘photographs.’’ 23 Likewise, the Office
will not allow applicants to add other
forms of authorship to the claim during
the examination process or with a
supplementary registration.
In all cases, the copyright claimant for
each photograph must be the same
person or organization.24 Specifically,
the claimant must be the author of all
the photographs in the group, or the
copyright owner that owns all the
exclusive rights in those photographs.25
Applicants will be allowed to register
a group of photographs if the claimant
obtained all the exclusive rights in those
works through a transfer of ownership.
Likewise, applicants will be allowed to
register a group of photographs as works
made for hire (i) if all the photographs
are identified in the application as
works made for hire, (ii) if all the
photographs were created by the same
22 Joint authors will not be able to use GRPPH or
GRUPH. The Office is willing to entertain these
types of claims if the applicant submits a separate
application for each individual photograph (i.e., not
using the group option) and provides a sufficient
basis for the claim of joint authorship.
23 To assert a claim in ‘‘digital editing’’ applicants
may submit a separate application and a separate
filing fee for each photograph (rather than
submitting a group of photographs under GRPPH or
GRUPH). In appropriate cases, applicants may
assert a claim in a ‘‘compilation’’ of photographs by
registering them as part of a collective work, such
as a book of photographs, an exhibition catalog, a
calendar, or the like.
24 This requirement appears in the current
regulation governing groups of published
photographs. 37 CFR 202.3(b)(10)(i).
25 The term ‘‘claimant’’ is defined in
§ 202.3(a)(3)(iii) of the regulations. That provision
contains a footnote stating that a person or
organization that has obtained ‘‘the contractual
right to claim legal title to the copyright’’ may be
named as claimant. 37 CFR 202.3(a)(3)(ii) n.1. The
Office proposed to eliminate this footnote in a prior
rulemaking. See Registration of Copyright:
Definition of Claimant, 77 FR 29257, 29259 (May
17, 2012). The Office expects to issue a final rule
in that proceeding before the new regulations
governing GRPPH and GRUPH go into effect.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:51 Nov 30, 2016
Jkt 241001
individual for the same employer, and
(iii) if the photographer and the
employer are both listed in the name of
author field (e.g., ‘‘Advertising Agency
LLC, employer for hire of John
Smith’’).26 However, the Office will not
allow applicants to combine works
made for hire with works obtained
through a transfer of ownership.
Similarly, the electronic system will not
allow works created by one
photographer to be combined with
works created by a different
photographer (even if those works are
owned by the same claimant).
For example, if an advertising agency
acquired a group of photographs from a
particular photographer through an
assignment of copyright and acquired
another group of photographs taken by
the same photographer through a work
made for hire agreement, the agency
could register those photographs under
GRPPH or GRUPH only by separating
the photographs into two groups and
submit a separate application for each
group (i.e., one application with the
work made for hire question answered
‘‘yes’’ and the other with the question
answered ‘‘no’’). Likewise, if the agency
hired five freelancers to take
photographs pursuant to a work made
for hire agreement, the agency should
separate the photographs into five
separate groups (i.e., one group for each
photographer) and submit a separate
application for each group.
3. Publication and Titles
The group options for published and
unpublished photographs are designed
to be mutually exclusive of each other.
Under the Proposed Rule, an applicant
will be allowed to register a group of
unpublished photographs if all the
photographs are unpublished, and will
be allowed to register a group of
published photographs if all the
photographs are published. Applicants
will not be allowed to combine
published and unpublished
photographs in the same claim. In
addition, in the case of published
photographs, all the works must be
published within the same nation and
within the same calendar year (e.g.,
January 1 through December 31,
2016).27 When completing the online
application, applicants will be asked to
verify this information by providing the
earliest date and the most recent date
26 This requirement appears in the current
regulation governing groups of published
photographs. 37 CFR 202.3(b)(10)(ix).
27 The current regulation governing GRPPH states
that the photographs must be published within the
same calendar year, but does not indicate whether
the photographs must be published within the same
nation. 37 CFR 202.3(b)(10)(iii).
PO 00000
Frm 00037
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
that photographs were published during
the year.
To register a group of published or
unpublished photographs, applicants
will be required to provide a title for the
group as a whole, and will be required
to include this information in the online
application itself. For example, the
applicant may provide a title that
identifies the photographer and the
month/year that the photographs were
created, such as ‘‘Jack Jackson’s photos
May through July 2016,’’ or one that
identifies the subject matter of the
photographs, such as ‘‘Tropical Images
from Hawaii.’’
In addition to this basic information
about the group of photographs,
applicants will be required to submit a
separate document in Excel format
(‘‘.xls’’), Portable Document Format
(‘‘PDF’’), or other electronic format that
may be specifically approved by the
Office that contains a sequentially
numbered 28 list with a title, file name
(matching the file name of the
corresponding deposit copy), and in the
case of GRPPH, the month and year of
publication 29 (e.g., ‘‘January 2016,’’
‘‘February 2016,’’ etc.) for each
photograph in the group.30 This list
must be submitted together with the
copies of the photographs, by uploading
them through the electronic system or
by sending them on a physical storage
device. The specific requirements of this
list are discussed below.
In addition, applicants will be
encouraged—but not required—to
provide title and publication
information in the online application
itself. The Office will provide
instructions on its Web site that will
explain how to copy this information
from the numbered list into the
appropriate fields in the online
application.
Although applicants will not be
required to provide title and publication
information in the online application,
there are certain advantages to doing so.
28 Each entry on the list must be sequentially
numbered (i.e., 1, 2, 3, etc.); these numbers can be
entered automatically with most spreadsheet
programs. The Office will use this information to
count the number of photographs that are included
in the deposit, and to ensure that it matches the
number of photographs claimed in the application.
29 Applicants will not be required to provide a
precise date of publication for each photograph in
the group (i.e., month, day, and year). This
represents a change in the current policy for
registering a group of published photographs.
Under the current regulation for GRPPH, applicants
generally are required to provide a month, day, and
year of publication for each photograph, although
they may provide a range of dates if the application
is received within three months after the first date
of publication specified in the application.
30 The specific requirements for the numbered list
are discussed below in Section III.D.1.b.
E:\FR\FM\01DEP1.SGM
01DEP1
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 231 / Thursday, December 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
If the applicant includes the titles in the
online application, they will appear on
the certificate of registration and in the
Office’s online database. This will
improve the quality of the registration
record by making the information more
accessible to the public. If this
information appears on the certificate,
and if the certificate is issued within
five years after the publication of a
particular photograph, the certificate
will create a legal presumption that the
work was published in the month and
year specified on the certificate. See 17
U.S.C. 410(c).
By contrast, if the applicant provides
title and publication information in the
numbered list, but does not include that
information in the online application
itself, the titles and publication dates
will not appear on the certificate of
registration or the Office’s online
database (although the Office will keep
a copy of the numbered list in its files).
In such cases, the Office will add an
annotation to the record, such as
‘‘Regarding title: deposit contains
complete list of titles that correspond to
the individual photographs included in
this group.’’
In comments regarding the Office’s
pilot program for electronic registration
of photographs, the PPA and other
organizations stated that photographers
struggle with the definition of
‘‘publication’’ and ‘‘the public,’’ and
find it difficult to determine whether
their works are published or
unpublished, particularly when they are
distributed in digital form. PPA, supra
note 11, at 2–3. They explained that
their members are reluctant to register
their works, in part, because they worry
about the possible consequences of
classifying an unpublished photograph
as a published work (or vice versa).
They asked the Office to address this
‘‘barrier to registration’’ by providing
clarification and guidance on these
issues. Id. at 3.
The new group option for
unpublished photographs will help
mitigate this problem by encouraging
early registration. The Office strongly
encourages photographers to register
their works before they are published
(i.e., before any distributions have
occurred), because this avoids much of
the confusion concerning publication
and the treatment of published works.
The new group option supports this
objective by giving photographers a
convenient and cost-effective means for
registering their photographs before they
are distributed to the public.
In addition, the Office released a
comprehensive revision of the
Compendium in 2014, which sets forth
and explains key administrative duties
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:51 Nov 30, 2016
Jkt 241001
of the Copyright Office under title 17 of
the United States Code. See 79 FR
78911, 78911–12 (Dec. 31, 2014).
Among other improvements, the
Compendium contains an entire chapter
on publication. This chapter provides a
detailed discussion of the definition of
‘‘publication’’ and ‘‘the public’’ and
specific examples of how the Office
applies these definitions to photographs
and other types of works. See generally
Compendium, chapter 1900. The
Compendium provides guidance on
how to determine whether a work is
published or unpublished when it is
posted on the internet or distributed
online. See id. section 1008.3. It also
explains how to correct an error in a
registration if the applicant mistakenly
claims that the work was published or
unpublished. See id. sections 1802.6(I),
1802.7(C).
In the future, the Office intends to
develop a portal on its Web site that will
provide photographers with pertinent
information on a wide range of
copyright issues. In developing these
resources it would be helpful to learn
more about the specific methods that
photographers use to distribute their
works to their customers and the general
public. The Office previously asked for
written comments on this issue in the
Visual Works Inquiry, and it welcomes
additional input as part of this
rulemaking.
D. The Deposit Requirement
The Proposed Rule will modify the
deposit requirements for the group
option for published photographs and
the group option for photographic
databases, and it will establish similar
requirements for the new option for
unpublished photographs. These
requirements are summarized below.31
1. Deposit Requirements for GRPPH and
GRUPH
a. Digital Photographs
Under the Proposed Rule, applicants
will be required to submit a digital copy
of each photograph that is included in
a group of published photographs
31 The rule proposed in the GRCP Rulemaking
will modify the deposit requirements for registering
a group of contributions to periodicals in some
respects. By contrast, the Office is not proposing to
make any changes to the deposit requirements for
an individual photograph or a collective work, such
as a calendar or a book of photographs. To register
an individual photograph, the applicant should
submit two complete copies of the best edition if
the photograph has been published in the United
States or one complete copy if the photograph is
unpublished. To register a collective work, the
applicant should submit one complete copy of the
collective work (if it is unpublished) or two
complete copies of the best edition (if the work has
been published in the United States). See generally
Compendium, chapter 1500.
PO 00000
Frm 00038
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
86651
(GRPPH) or a group of unpublished
photographs (GRUPH). Applicants will
be required to submit each photograph
in one of the following formats: JPEG,
GIF, TIFF, or PCD. The Office will no
longer accept physical copies, such as
prints, contact sheets, slides,
photocopies, videotapes, or clippings
from a newspaper, magazine, or other
publication. This should not impose a
significant burden on photographers
because it appears that the vast majority
of them use digital cameras.
b. Numbered List of Photographs
In addition, as noted above,
applicants will be required to submit a
separate document containing a
sequentially numbered list that
identifies the title and file name—and in
the case of published photographs, the
month and year of publication—for each
photograph in the group. The Office will
provide a template on its Web site that
may be used to prepare this list. The
title and file name for a particular
photograph may be the same, and may
consist solely of numbers, letters, and
spaces that were automatically assigned
by the camera or a unique identifier that
has been assigned to the image by a
third party, such as the PLUS Registry.
As noted above, the file names specified
in the list must match the corresponding
file names in the deposit copy.
However, the file name should not
contain slashes or any other form of
punctuation. Including punctuation
marks in the file name (other than
spaces) may cause a system error that
may prevent the Office from viewing the
photographs. The Office also
discourages applicants from stating
‘‘Untitled,’’ ‘‘No Title,’’ or the like,
because interested parties typically
search for works by title and it may be
impossible to locate a particular
photograph unless a meaningful title
has been provided.
The Office will use the list to examine
and document the claim, particularly in
cases where the applicant does not
provide title or publication information
in the online application itself. In
addition, the Office may use the list to
locate and retrieve the deposit in the
event it is needed for litigation or other
legitimate purposes. For these reasons,
the titles and file names specified in the
list must correspond to the titles and
files names for the actual photographs
that are included in the deposit. In this
respect, the Proposed Rule builds upon
a suggestion that the Digital Media
E:\FR\FM\01DEP1.SGM
01DEP1
86652
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 231 / Thursday, December 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Licensing Association (‘‘DMLA’’)
offered in a prior rulemaking.32
The list must be contained in an
electronic file in Excel format (‘‘.xls’’),
Portable Document Format (‘‘PDF’’), or
other electronic format that may be
specifically approved by the Office. The
file name for the list must include the
title of the group as a whole and the
eleven-digit case number that is
automatically assigned to the
application by the electronic system
(e.g., ’’ [Title of Group] Case Number
12345678910’’). The Office will provide
further guidance regarding the preferred
format and naming conventions for
these file names on its Web site and in
Chapter 1100 of the Compendium.
When completing the online
application, applicants will be asked to
provide the file name for this document
in the application itself. This will help
the Office connect the numbered list
with the relevant application, and to
distinguish it from the files that contain
the digital photographs.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
c. Procedure for Submitting the Digital
Photographs and the Numbered List of
Photographs
Applicants will be required to submit
the files containing the digital
photographs together with the file that
contains the sequentially numbered list
of photographs. Applicants may upload
these files through the electronic
system. Alternatively, they may save
them onto a physical storage device,
such as a flash drive or a CD–R or DVD–
R, and send it to the Office by mail, by
courier, or by hand delivery together
with the required shipping slip.
When submitting files through the
electronic system, applicants will be
strongly encouraged to save them in a
.zip file and then upload the .zip file to
the system. In all cases, the size of each
uploaded file must not exceed 500
megabytes, although the applicant may
digitally compress the photographs to
comply with this limitation.
When submitting files on a flash drive
or other storage device, applicants must
send that device in the same package
with the shipping slip that is generated
by the electronic system. If the applicant
fails to include the required shipping
slip, the Office may be unable to
connect the storage device with the
appropriate application. In such cases,
32 DMLA was previously known as the Picture
Archive Council of America (‘‘PACA’’). In a prior
rulemaking, it stated that works deposited with the
Office should be accessible upon request so that
parties can easily determine whether a particular
photograph is covered by a particular registration.
PACA at 1, available at https://copyright.gov/
rulemaking/databases/comments/picture-archivecouncil-of-america.pdf.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:51 Nov 30, 2016
Jkt 241001
the applicant will be required to pay an
additional fee to search for the deposit
and connect it with the application. If
the deposit cannot be located, the
applicant will be required to resubmit
the storage device, which may change
the effective date of registration for the
claim.
Packages that are delivered to the
Office by mail or by courier will be
irradiated to destroy possible
contaminants, such as anthrax. This
process may damage files stored on
electronic media. To avoid this result,
applicants will be strongly encouraged
to send physical storage devices to the
Office in boxes rather than envelopes.
Additional information concerning the
recommended procedure for delivering
physical deposits by mail or by courier
will be provided in the Compendium.
2. Deposit Requirements for
Photographic Databases
The Proposed Rule will impose the
same deposit requirements on a
database that consists predominantly of
photographs. Specifically, database
owners will be required to submit a
digital copy of each photograph that is
included in the claim, and a separate
document containing a sequentially
numbered list that identifies the title
and file name—and in the case of
published photographs, the month and
year of publication—for each
photograph.33 Database owners will be
required to submit digital copies,
regardless of whether they intend to file
an online application under the pilot
program (in which case the photographs
and the numbered list may be uploaded
to the electronic system or submitted on
a physical storage device with the
required shipping slip) or a paper
application (in which case the
photographs and the numbered list may
be submitted on a physical storage
device together with Form VA).34
E. When should a group registration be
filed?
An application for a group registration
may be filed at any time. However, a
photograph must be registered in a
timely manner to seek statutory
damages and attorney’s fees in an
infringement action. Specifically, a
copyright owner typically may seek
these remedies if a photograph was
registered (i) before the infringement
33 As discussed in Section III.D.1.b, the Office
will provide a standard template that may be used
to prepare the numbered list of photographs.
34 When submitting an online application the
storage device must be accompanied by the
shipping slip that is generated by the electronic
system. When submitting a paper application, the
device must be accompanied by Form VA.
PO 00000
Frm 00039
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
commenced or (ii) within three months
after the first publication of that work.
See 17 U.S.C. 412.
In the case of unpublished
photographs, the Office strongly
encourages photographers to register
their works before sharing them with
any other party. By doing so,
photographers preserve the ability to
seek statutory damages and attorney’s
fees in subsequent infringement
disputes involving those works.
In the case of published photographs,
the Office encourages photographers to
submit their claims every three months
(instead of filing on an annual or semiannual basis), and in each case, to file
the claim within three months after the
earliest date of publication specified in
the application. For example, if a
photographer first published his or her
photographs on June 1, 2016, it would
be advisable to submit a complete
application, deposit, and filing fee on or
before September 1, 2016. By doing so,
the photographer would preserve his or
her ability to seek statutory damages
and attorney’s fees for any
infringements that began after the
effective date of registration (i.e., after
September 1, 2016), as well as any
infringements that occurred within
three months after the date of
publication (i.e., between June 1, 2016
and September 1, 2016).
F. The Scope of a Group Registration
The Proposed Rule memorializes the
Office’s longstanding position regarding
the scope of a registration for a group of
published photographs, and it confirms
that the Office will take the same
position regarding the group option for
unpublished photographs.
When the Office issues a group
registration, it prepares one certificate of
registration for the entire group and
assigns one registration number to that
certificate. The Proposed Rule clarifies
that a registration for a group of
published or unpublished photographs
covers each photograph in the group,
and that each photograph is registered
as a separate ‘‘work.’’ This
understanding is consistent with the
statutory scheme. The legislative history
makes clear that group registration was
‘‘a needed and important liberalization
of the law [then] in effect,’’ which to
that point had required ‘‘separate
registrations where related works or
parts of a work are published
separately.’’ H.R. Rep. No. 94–1476, at
154 (1976). In particular, Congress noted
that ‘‘the technical necessity for separate
applications and fees has caused
copyright owners to forego copyright
altogether.’’ Id. Given that context, it
would be anomalous for works
E:\FR\FM\01DEP1.SGM
01DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 231 / Thursday, December 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
registered as part of a group registration
application to be given less protection
than if they had been registered through
separate applications.
For similar reasons, the Proposed
Rule also clarifies that when a group of
photographs is registered under GRPPH
or GRUPH, the group as a whole is not
considered a compilation or a collective
work under sections 101, 103(b), or
504(c)(1) of the Copyright Act. The
group is merely an administrative
classification created solely for the
purpose of registering multiple
photographs with one application and
one filing fee. See 17 U.S.C. 408(c)(1)
(‘‘Th[e] administrative classification of
works has no significance with respect
to the subject matter of copyright or the
exclusive rights provided by this title.’’).
Although an applicant may exercise
some judgment in selecting the
photographs that are included within a
particular group, that decision does not
necessarily constitute copyrightable
authorship. Instead, the selection is
based on the regulatory requirements for
these group options, and any
coordination or arrangement of the
photographs is merely an administrative
formality that facilitates the
examination of the works.
Likewise, the Proposed Rule clarifies
that the group is not considered a
derivative work under sections 101,
103(b), or 504(c)(1) of the Copyright Act.
When a group of photographs is
compiled for the purpose of facilitating
registration, those works are not ‘‘recast,
transformed, or adapted’’ in any way,
and the group as a whole is not ‘‘a work
based upon one or more preexisting
works’’ because there is no
copyrightable authorship in simply
following the administrative
requirements for GRPPH or GRUPH. 17
U.S.C. 101 (definition of ‘‘derivative
work’’).
G. Group Registration of Published and
Unpublished Photographs Distinguished
From Other Registration Options
This section discusses the key
differences between the options for
registering a group of published or
unpublished photographs as compared
to the options for registering an
unpublished collection, a group of
contributions to periodicals, a
photographic database, or a collective
work.
1. Group Registration of Unpublished
Photographs vs. Unpublished
Collections
The group option for unpublished
photographs is intended to replace the
option that currently allows an
applicant to register a number of
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:51 Nov 30, 2016
Jkt 241001
photographs as an unpublished
collection. Once the Proposed Rule goes
into effect, the Office will no longer
accept an application to register
photographs under § 202.3(b)(4)(i)(B) of
the regulations, regardless of whether
the photographs are submitted with a
standard application or a paper
application (although the Office will
continue to accept applications to
register other types of works under this
provision).
As explained, the GRUPH option
provides a more efficient mechanism for
capturing information about
photographs, and incorporating that
information into the public record.
Requiring applicants to use this option
may also provide photographers with
certain legal benefits.
When an applicant submits
photographs via the unpublished
collection option, and asserts a claim in
both the individual photographs as well
as the selection and arrangement of the
collection as whole, the Office will
register the claim as an unpublished
collective work, rather than an
unpublished collection. A collective
work is—by definition—a form of
compilation. 17 U.S.C. 101 (‘‘The term
‘compilation’ includes collective
works.’’). Section 504(c)(1) of the
Copyright Act states that a copyright
owner may be entitled to recover ‘‘an
award of statutory damages for all
infringements involved in [an
infringement] action, with respect to
any one work,’’ but ‘‘[f]or the purposes
of this subsection, all the parts of a
compilation . . . constitute one work.’’
17 U.S.C. 504(c)(1). In other words,
when a number of photographs are
registered as an unpublished collective
work, the copyright owner would be
entitled to seek only one award of
statutory damages in an infringement
action, rather than a separate award for
each photograph.
In contrast, as noted above in Section
III.F, when a number of photographs are
registered under the GRUPH option,
each photograph is registered as a
separate work. For purposes of
registration, the group as a whole is not
considered a collective work or
compilation, and thus, the individual
photographs within the group would
not be subject to the limitation on
statutory damages set forth in section
504(c)(1). Instead, a registration for a
group of unpublished photographs is
treated as a separate registration for each
photograph that is included within the
group.
PO 00000
Frm 00040
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
86653
2. Group Registration of Published
Photographs vs. Group Registration for
Contributions to Periodicals
The group option for published
photographs is not intended to alter or
replace the group option for
contributions to periodicals.
Photographers may continue to register
their works as a group of published
photographs or a group of contributions
to periodicals, as long as they satisfy the
relevant requirements for each option.
There are some notable differences
between these registration options.
While a group of published photographs
may include no more than 750 images,
there is no limit on the number of
photographs that may be included
within a group of contributions to
periodicals. Moreover, a group of
published photographs may include
photographs that were published during
the same calendar year, while a group
of contributions to periodicals may
include photographs that were
published over a twelve-month period—
even if that period extends from one
calendar year to the next (e.g.,
September 1, 2015 through August 31,
2016). In addition, to be eligible for
GRPPH, the photographs may be
published in any manner, but there is
no need to specify the medium of
publication and no need to submit the
photographs in the specific form in
which they were first published. To be
eligible for GRCP, the photographs must
be first published in a periodical (e.g.,
a newspaper, a magazine, etc.), the
applicant must provide pertinent
information about each periodical (e.g.,
title, issue number, publication date,
etc.), and the applicant must submit a
copy of the photographs as they
appeared in each publication (e.g., a
copy of the entire periodical, a copy of
an entire section from a newspaper,
etc.).
The Office generally encourages
applicants to use GRPPH, in part,
because the deposit requirements for
published photographs are more flexible
than the deposit requirements for GRCP.
Regardless of whether the applicant
uses GRPPH or GRCP, the registration
will cover all the photographs that are
included within the group.
3. Group Registration of Photographs vs.
Group Registration for Photographic
Databases
As noted above, the Proposed Rule
makes certain modifications to the
deposit requirement for databases that
predominantly consist of photographs.
The Proposed Rule will not change any
of the other requirements for these types
E:\FR\FM\01DEP1.SGM
01DEP1
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
86654
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 231 / Thursday, December 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
of claims. See 37 CFR 202.3(b)(5);
202.20(c)(2)(vii)(D)(8).
Although the Office will continue to
accept these claims, the Office strongly
encourages photographers, stock
photography companies, database
providers, and other interested parties
to register their works with the group
option for published or unpublished
photographs—rather than the database
option—for several reasons. Many
photography Web sites and catalogs do
not qualify as a database, and therefore,
are not eligible for the group option for
photographic databases. For purposes of
registration, a database is defined ‘‘as a
compilation of digital information
comprised of data, information,
abstracts, images, maps, music, sound
recordings, video, other digitized
material, or references to a particular
subject or subjects. In all cases, the
content of a database must be arranged
in a systematic manner, and it must be
accessed solely by means of an
integrated information retrieval program
or system with the following
characteristics.’’ Compendium section
1117.1. First, ‘‘a query function must be
used to access the content.’’ Id. Second,
‘‘[t]he information retrieval program or
system must yield a subset of the
content, or it must organize the content
based on the parameters specified in
each query.’’ Id.
Stock photography Web sites or
catalogs that merely display
photographs do not satisfy these
requirements and therefore are not
considered databases for the purpose of
registration. In most cases, users may
access all the content on a Web site or
in a catalog by scrolling or browsing
through the individual images or
categories of related images. Id. section
1002.6. By contrast, users cannot access
the content of a database in its entirety.
Id. Instead, they must use a query
function to identify specific content
within the database, and they must use
an information retrieval system to
extract the content that matches the
user’s search criteria. Id. While a user
may view the entire content of a Web
site or catalog, a user may view the
content of a database only to the extent
that it matches a particular query that
the user entered into the information
retrieval system. Id. While some Web
sites may provide a search feature that
may be used to locate particular images
or categories of images, these types of
features do not qualify as an information
retrieval system nor do they transform
an ordinary Web site into a database,
because these features are not the sole
means for accessing the images posted
on the site. See id. If the Office
determines that a particular Web site,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:51 Nov 30, 2016
Jkt 241001
catalog, or other work does not qualify
as a database, the Office will refuse to
register the work as a database or as a
group of updates or revisions to a
photographic database.
Copyright owners also should
consider the following issue before
registering their photographs as part of
a photographic database. As noted
above in Section III.G.1, the Copyright
Act states that a copyright owner may be
entitled to recover ‘‘an award of
statutory damages for all infringements
involved in [an infringement] action,
with respect to any one work,’’ but
‘‘[f]or the purposes of this subsection,
all the parts of a compilation . . .
constitute one work.’’ 17 U.S.C.
504(c)(1). A database is—by definition—
a compilation. See Alaska Stock, LLC v.
Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing
Co., 747 F.3d 673, 676 (9th Cir. 2014)
(concluding that a photographic
database is a collective work); see also
Compendium section 1117.1 (same).
Consequently, when a group of
photographs is registered as a database,
the copyright owner may be entitled to
seek only one award of statutory
damages for the database as a whole—
rather than a separate award for each
photograph—even if the defendant
infringed all the photographs that are
covered by the registration.
By contrast, when a copyright owner
registers a group of photographs under
GRPPH or GRUPH, the registration
covers each photograph in the group,
but the group itself is not a compilation
within the meaning of the Copyright
Act. Therefore, any claim for
infringement would not be subject to the
limitation set forth in Section 504(c)(1)
of the Copyright Act. For these reasons,
the group options for published and
unpublished photographs provide
significant benefits, while avoiding the
potential downside of registering a
number of works as part of a
photographic database.
4. Group Registration of Photographs vs.
Collective Works
The Proposed Rule will not change
the requirements for registering a
number of photographs as part of a
collective work, such as a book of
photographs, a travel guide, or the like.
Applicants may continue to register
these types of works with a standard
application submitted through the
electronic system or with a paper
application submitted on Form VA.
Registration of photographs as part of
a collective work differs in many
respects from group registration of
photographs. A registration for a
collective work may include
photographs taken by multiple
PO 00000
Frm 00041
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
photographers (even if the
photographers are not explicitly named
in the application), and there is no limit
on the number of photographs that may
be included within each claim. If the
claim is approved, the registration will
cover the authorship involved in
selecting, coordinating, and/or arranging
the content of the collective work as a
whole. It also may cover the individual
photographs that appear in the
collective work if the claimant owns the
copyright in those images and the
collective work as a whole, and if the
photographs have not been previously
published or registered.
There are some drawbacks to
registering photographs as a collective
work. As discussed in Section III.G.1, a
collective work is—by definition—a
compilation. As such, these types of
works are subject to the limitation set
forth in section 504(c)(1) of the
Copyright Act. When a number of
photographs are registered as part of a
collective work, the copyright owner
may be entitled to receive only one
award of statutory damages in an
infringement action, even if the
defendant infringed all the photographs
that appear in that work (regardless of
whether the collective work is
published or unpublished). By contrast,
when a group of photographs are
registered under GRPPH or GRUPH, the
copyright owner would not be subject to
the collective-work limitation in section
504(c)(1). For this reason, photographers
may wish to register their photographs
under GRPPH or GRUPH, even if those
works also may be eligible for
registration as part of a collective work.
H. Technical Amendments
The Proposed Rule will move the
regulation governing published
photographs from § 202.3 to § 202.4.35
In the future, the Office intends to move
all regulations governing the various
group options that have been
implemented under section 408(c) of the
Copyright Act to § 202.4. This change is
intended to improve the readability of
the existing regulations, but it does not
represent a substantive change in
policy.
In addition, the Proposed Rule
incorporates the definitions of
‘‘claimant’’ and ‘‘Class VA’’ that are set
forth in § 202.3, and it confirms that an
application for a group of photographs
may be submitted by any of the parties
listed in § 202.3(c)(1), namely (i) the
author or copyright claimant of those
35 The Office recently issued a notice of proposed
rulemaking that would remove the current text of
§ 202.4 and reserve that section for later use. See
Copyright Office Technical Amendments, 81 FR
67940, 67942 (Oct. 3, 2016).
E:\FR\FM\01DEP1.SGM
01DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 231 / Thursday, December 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
works, (ii) the owner of any of the
exclusive rights in those works, or (iii)
a duly authorized agent of any author,
claimant, or owner of exclusive rights.
IV. Conclusion
The Proposed Rule will allow broader
participation in the registration system
by expanding the class of works that
may be registered as a group, increase
the efficiency of the registration process,
and create a more robust record of the
claim. The Office invites public
comment on these proposed changes.
List of Subjects
§ 202.3
Registration of copyright.
*
*
*
*
*
(b) * * *
(4) * * *
(ii) In the case of an application for
registration made under paragraphs
(b)(4) through (b)(10) of this section or
under § 202.4, the ‘‘year of creation,’’
‘‘year of completion,’’ or ‘‘year in which
creation of this work was completed,’’
means the latest year in which the
creation of any copyrightable element
was completed.
*
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
37 CFR Part 201
Copyright, General provisions.
37 CFR Part 202
Copyright, Preregistration and
registration of claims to copyright.
Proposed Regulation
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the U.S. Copyright Office
proposes amending 37 CFR parts 201
and 202, as follows:
PART 201—GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. The authority citation for part 201
is amended to read as follows:
■
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 702.
2. Amend § 201.3 by:
a. Redesignating paragraphs (c)(3)
through (18) as paragraphs (c)(4)
through (19), respectively.
■ b. Adding new paragraph (c)(3).
■ c. Revising newly redesignated
paragraph (c)(4).
The revisions and additions to read as
follows:
■
■
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
a. In paragraph (b)(3) removing the
phrase ‘‘, subject to the limitations in
paragraph (b)(10)(v) of this section’’ .
■ b. Revising paragraph (b)(4)(ii).
■ c. Removing and reserving paragraph
(b)(10).
■ d. In the text of paragraph (c)(2),
removing the reference to footnote ‘‘6’’
and adding in its place a reference to
footnote ‘‘5’’.
■ e. In paragraph (c)(2), revising
footnote 5.
The revisions to read as follows:
■
5 In the case of an application to register a
group of newspapers, newsletters,
contributions to periodicals, or photographs
under paragraphs (b)(7) or (9) of this section
or under § 202.4, the deposit shall comply
with the respective requirements specified in
those paragraphs.
*
■
*
*
*
*
6. Revise § 202.4 to read as follows:
§ 202.4
Group Registration.
(a) This section prescribes conditions
for issuing a registration for a group of
related works under section 408(c) of
§ 201.3 Fees for registration, recordation,
title 17 of the United States Code.
and related services, special services, and
(b) Definitions. For purposes of this
services performed by the Licensing
section, the terms copy and work made
Division.
for hire have the meanings set forth in
*
*
*
*
*
section 101 of title 17 of the United
(c) * * *
States Code, and the terms claimant and
Class VA have the meanings set forth in
(3) Registration of a claim in a group of
§ 202.3(a)(3) and (b)(1)(iii).
published photographs or a claim in a
(c) [Reserved]
group of unpublished photographs .....
55
(d) [Reserved]
(4) Registration for a database that pre(e) [Reserved]
dominantly consists of photographs
(f) [Reserved]
and updates thereto:.
(g) [Reserved]
(i) Electronic filing ...................................
55
(ii) Paper filing ........................................
65
(h) [Reserved]
(i) Group registration of unpublished
*
*
*
*
*
photographs. Pursuant to the authority
granted by 17 U.S.C. 408(c)(1), the
PART 202—PREREGISTRATION AND
Register of Copyrights has determined
REGISTRATION OF CLAIMS TO
that a group of unpublished
COPYRIGHT
photographs may be registered in Class
VA with one application, one filing fee,
■ 3. The authority citation for part 202
and the required deposit, if the
continues to read as follows:
following conditions are met:
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 408(f), 702.
(1) All the works in the group must be
■ 4. Amend § 202.3 by:
photographs.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:51 Nov 30, 2016
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00042
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
86655
(2) The group must include no more
than 750 photographs, and the
application must specify the total
number of photographs that are
included in the group.
(3) All the photographs must be
created by the same photographer.
(4) The copyright claimant for all the
photographs must be the same person or
organization.
(5) The photographs may be registered
as works made for hire if all the
photographs are identified in the
application as such, if all the
photographs were created by the same
photographer for the same employer,
and if the application identifies both the
photographer and the employer in the
name of author field (e.g., ‘‘ABC
Corporation, employer for hire of John
Doe’’).
(6) All the photographs must be
unpublished.
(7) The applicant must provide a title
for the group as a whole.
(8) The applicant must complete and
submit the online application
designated for a group of unpublished
photographs. (The Office will not
register a group of unpublished
photographs as an unpublished
collection under § 202.3(b)(4)(i)(B).) The
application may be submitted by any of
the parties listed in § 202.3(c)(1).
(9) The appropriate filing fee, as
required by § 201.3(c) of this chapter,
must be included with the application
or charged to an active deposit account.
(10) The applicant must submit one
copy of each photograph in one of the
following formats: JPEG, GIF, TIFF, or
PCD. The file name for a particular
photograph may consist of letters,
numbers, and spaces, but the file name
should not contain any other form of
punctuation. The photographs may be
uploaded to the electronic registration
system together with the required
numbered list, preferably in a .zip file
containing all the photographs. The file
size for each uploaded file must not
exceed 500 megabytes; the photographs
may be compressed to comply with this
requirement. Alternatively, the
photographs and the required numbered
list may be saved on a physical storage
device, such as a flash drive, CD–R, or
DVD–R, and delivered to the Copyright
Office together with the required
shipping slip generated by the
electronic registration system.
(11) The applicant must submit a
sequentially numbered list containing a
title and file name for each photograph
in the group (matching the
corresponding file names for each
photograph specified in paragraph
(i)(10)). The title and file name for a
particular photograph may be the same.
E:\FR\FM\01DEP1.SGM
01DEP1
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
86656
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 231 / Thursday, December 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
The numbered list must be contained in
an electronic file in Excel format (.xls),
Portable Document Format (PDF), or
other electronic format approved by the
Office, and the file name for the list
must contain the title of the group and
the case number assigned to the
application by the electronic registration
system (e.g., ‘‘Title Of Group Case
Number 16283927239.xls’’).
(j) Group registration of published
photographs. Pursuant to the authority
granted by 17 U.S.C. 408(c)(1), the
Register of Copyrights has determined
that a group of published photographs
may be registered in Class VA with one
application, one filing fee, and the
required deposit, if the following
conditions are met:
(1) All the works in the group must be
photographs.
(2) The group must include no more
than 750 photographs, and the
application must specify the total
number of photographs that are
included in the group.
(3) All the photographs must be
created by the same photographer.
(4) The copyright claimant for all the
photographs must be the same person or
organization.
(5) The photographs may be registered
as works made for hire if all the
photographs are identified in the
application as such, if all the
photographs were created by the same
photographer for the same employer,
and if the application identifies both the
photographer and the employer in the
name of author field (e.g., ‘‘XYZ
Corporation, employer for hire of Jane
Doe’’).
(6) All the photographs must be
published within the same nation and
within the same calendar year, and the
applicant must specify the earliest and
latest date that the photographs were
published during the year.
(7) The applicant must provide a title
for the group as a whole.
(8) The applicant must complete and
submit the online application
designated for a group of published
photographs. The application may be
submitted by any of the parties listed in
§ 202.3(c)(1).
(9) The appropriate filing fee, as
required by § 201.3(c) of this chapter,
must be included with the application
or charged to an active deposit account.
(10) The applicant must submit one
copy of each photograph in one of the
following formats: JPEG, GIF, TIFF, or
PCD. The file name for a particular
photograph may consist of letters,
numbers, and spaces, but the file name
should not contain any other form of
punctuation. The photographs may be
uploaded to the electronic registration
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:51 Nov 30, 2016
Jkt 241001
system together with the required
numbered list, preferably in a .zip file
containing all the photographs. The file
size for each uploaded file must not
exceed 500 megabytes; the photographs
may be compressed to comply with this
requirement. Alternatively, the
photographs and the required numbered
list may be saved on a physical storage
device, such as a flash drive, CD–R, or
DVD–R, and delivered to the Copyright
Office together with the required
shipping slip generated by the
electronic registration system.
(11) The applicant must submit a
sequentially numbered list containing
the title, file name, and month and year
of publication for each photograph in
the group (matching the corresponding
file names for each photograph specified
in paragraph (j)(10)). The title and file
name for a particular photograph may
be the same. The numbered list must be
contained in an electronic file in Excel
format (.xls), Portable Document Format
(PDF), or other electronic format
approved by the Office, and the file
name for the list must contain the title
of the group and the case number
assigned to the application by the
electronic registration system (e.g.,
‘‘Title Of Group Case Number
16283927239.xls’’).
(k) [Reserved]
(l) [Reserved]
(m) [Reserved]
(n) The scope of a group registration.
When the Office issues a group
registration under paragraphs (i) or (j) of
this section, the registration covers each
work in the group and each work is
registered as a separate work. For
purposes of registration, the group as a
whole is not considered a compilation,
a collective work, or a derivative work
under sections 101, 103(b), or 504(c)(1)
of title 17 of the United States Code.
■ 7. Amend § 202.20 by:
■ a. Revising paragraph (c)(2)(vii)(D)(8);
and.
■ b. Removing paragraph (c)(2)(xx).
The revision to read as follows:
digital form in one of the following
formats: JPEG, GIF, TIFF, or PCD. In
addition, the applicant must submit a
sequentially numbered list containing
the title and file name—and if the
photographs have been published, the
month and year of publication—for each
photograph in the group. The title and
file name for a particular photograph
may be the same and may consist of
letters, numbers, and spaces, but the file
name should not contain any other form
of punctuation. The numbered list must
be contained in an electronic file in
Excel format (.xls), Portable Document
Format (PDF), or other electronic format
approved by the Office. The file name
for the list must contain the title of the
database, and the case number assigned
to the application by the electronic
registration system, if any (e.g., ‘‘Title Of
Database Case Number
162883927239.xls’’). The photographs
and the numbered list may be uploaded
to the electronic registration system
with the permission and under the
direction of the Visual Arts Division,
preferably in a .zip file containing these
materials. The file size for each
uploaded file must not exceed 500
megabytes; the photographs may be
compressed to comply with this
requirement. Alternatively, the
photographs and the numbered list may
be saved on a physical storage device,
such as a flash drive, CD–R, or DVD–R,
and delivered to the Copyright Office
together with the required shipping slip
generated by the electronic registration
system or with a paper application
submitted on Form VA.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: November 22, 2016.
Sarang V. Damle,
General Counsel and Associate Register of
Copyrights.
[FR Doc. 2016–28706 Filed 11–30–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410–30–P
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
§ 202.20 Deposit of copies and
phonorecords for copyright registration.
Copyright Office
*
37 CFR Parts 201, 202
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
(vii) * * *
(D) * * *
(8) In the case of an application for
registration of a database that consists
predominantly of photographs
(including a group registration for
revised or updated versions of such a
database), ‘‘identifying portions’’ shall
instead consist of all individual
photographs included in the claim.
Photographs must be submitted in
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
[Docket No. 2016–9]
Supplementary Registration
U.S. Copyright Office, Library
of Congress.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Copyright Office is
proposing to amend the regulation
governing supplementary registration to
reflect certain technical upgrades that
will soon be made to the electronic
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\01DEP1.SGM
01DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 231 (Thursday, December 1, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 86643-86656]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-28706]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Copyright Office
37 CFR Parts 201, 202
[Docket No. 2016-10]
Group Registration of Photographs
AGENCY: U.S. Copyright Office, Library of Congress.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Copyright Office is proposing to update its
regulations governing group registration options for photographers to
encourage broader participation in the registration system, increase
the efficiency of the registration process, and create a more robust
record of the claim. First, the Office has created new online
registration applications specifically designed for group registrations
of published photographs and group registrations of unpublished
photographs. The proposed rule would require applicants to use these
online applications, in lieu of any existing paper application.
Applicants will be allowed to include up to 750 photographs with each
application. Second, the proposal would eliminate less-efficient forms
of registering photographs that have been adopted over the years--
namely, the pilot program permitting group registration of published
photographs using the electronic application designed for registering a
single work, and the option of registering a number of unpublished
photographs as an ``unpublished collection.'' The pilot program for
photographic databases will remain in effect. Third, the proposed rule
will update the deposit requirement for group registrations of
photographs and photographic databases by requiring applicants to
submit their works in digital form.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule must be made in writing and must
be received in the U.S. Copyright Office no later than January 3, 2017.
ADDRESSES: For reasons of government efficiency, the Copyright Office
is using the regulations.gov system for the submission and posting of
public comments in this proceeding. All comments are therefore to be
submitted electronically through regulations.gov. Specific instructions
for submitting comments are available on the Copyright Office Web site
at https://www.copyright.gov/rulemaking/group-photographs/. If
electronic submission of comments is not feasible due to lack of access
to a computer and/or the Internet, please contact the Office using the
contact information below for special instructions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert J. Kasunic, Associate Register
of Copyrights and Director of Registration Policy and Practice, or Erik
Bertin, Deputy Director of Registration Policy and Practice, at 202-
707-8040.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The U.S. Copyright Office (the ``Office'')
is proposing to amend the regulation that
[[Page 86644]]
governs the group registration option for published photographs. In
addition, the Office is proposing to create a new group registration
option for unpublished photographs. Finally, the Office is proposing to
amend the deposit requirements for groups of published photographs and
photographic databases, and is proposing to establish similar deposit
requirements for the new group option for unpublished photographs.
These proposals are discussed in more detail below. The Office invites
public comment on each proposal.
Last year the Office issued a notice of inquiry concerning the
practical and legal challenges faced by photographers, graphic artists,
and illustrators (referred to herein as the ``Visual Works Inquiry''
\1\). See 80 FR 23054 (Apr. 24, 2015). The Office recognized that
photographers, graphic artists, and illustrators have a broad impact on
U.S. culture, but they face significant challenges in the digital age.
To better understand these challenges, the Office requested written
comments on how photographs, graphic artworks, and illustrations are
monetized, licensed, registered, and enforced under the Copyright Act
of 1976 (``the Copyright Act''). The Office sought information
concerning the current marketplace for these types of works, as well as
observations regarding the real or potential obstacles that these
creators and their licensees or other representatives face when
navigating the digital landscape. With respect to registration, the
Office asked the public to identify the most significant challenges for
photographers and other visual artists. 80 FR at 23056.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ Information concerning the Visual Works Inquiry is available
on the Office's Web site at https://copyright.gov/policy/visualworks/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Office received 2,795 comments and 166 reply comments in
response to the Visual Works Inquiry. The Office has not attempted to
address these comments in this notice of proposed rulemaking.\2\ The
rule proposed in this notice focuses solely on photographs, and it
represents an interim improvement to the current electronic
registration system. In the future, the Office may consider other
options as it assesses the broader concerns of visual artists
generally.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ In preparing this notice of proposed rulemaking the Office
did consider comments submitted in a prior rulemaking concerning the
deposit requirements for photographic databases, which was completed
in July 2012. Information concerning that rulemaking is available on
the Office's Web site at https://copyright.gov/rulemaking/databases/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
I. Background
When Congress enacted the Copyright Act, it authorized the Register
of Copyrights (the ``Register'') to specify by regulation the
administrative classes of works for the purpose of seeking a
registration and the nature of the deposit required for each such
class. In addition, Congress gave the Register the discretion to allow
groups of related works to be registered with one application and one
filing fee, a procedure known as ``group registration.'' See 17 U.S.C.
408(c)(1). Pursuant to this authority, the Register issued regulations
permitting the Office to issue group registrations for certain limited
categories of works, provided that certain conditions have been met.
See generally 37 CFR 202.3(b)(5)-(10).
As the legislative history explains, allowing ``a number of related
works to be registered together as a group represent[ed] a needed and
important liberalization of the law.'' H.R. Rep. No. 94-1476, at 154
(1976), reprinted in 1976 U.S.C.C.A.N. 5659, 5770; S. Rep. No. 94-473,
at 136 (1975). Congress recognized that requiring applicants to submit
separate applications for certain types of works may be so burdensome
and expensive that authors and copyright owners may forgo registration
altogether, since copyright registration is not a prerequisite to
copyright protection. Id. If copyright owners do not submit their works
for registration under this permissive system, the public record will
not contain any information concerning those works. This creates a void
in the record that diminishes the value of the Office's database.
Congress cited ``a group of photographs by one photographer'' as an
example of a ``group of related works'' that would be suitable for
registration under section 408(c)(1). Id. At the same time, when large
numbers of works are bundled together in one application, information
about the individual works may not be adequately captured. Therefore,
group registration options require careful balancing of the need for an
accurate public record and the need for an efficient method of
facilitating the registration of multiple photographs.
II. Existing Registration Accommodations for Photographers
Under the Copyright Office's existing regulations and registration
practice, photographers have several options for registering groups or
collections of photographs with one application and one filing fee.
These options are summarized below.
A. Group Registration of Published Photographs
After conducting an extensive rulemaking, the Office issued a
regulation in 2001 that allows applicants to register a group of
published photographs with one application and one filing fee. See 66
FR 37142, 37149-50 (July 17, 2001). The Office refers to this procedure
as the ``group option for published photographs'' or ``GRPPH.''
An applicant may register a group of photographs under this
procedure if all the photographs were taken by the same photographer
and were published within the same calendar year, and if the copyright
claimant for all the photographs is the same person or organization. 37
CFR 202.3(b)(10)(i)-(iii). If the photographs were created as works
made for hire, the application must provide both the name of the
photographer and the name of the photographer's employer or the party
who specially ordered or commissioned the photographs (e.g., ``ABC
Corporation, employer for hire of John Doe''). Id. Sec.
202.3(b)(10)(ix).
As a general rule, the applicant must provide a precise date of
publication for each photograph in the group (i.e., month, day, and
year), either by providing the date on the application, on a
continuation sheet submitted on Form GR/PPh/CON,\3\ on a separate list
submitted on paper or in a text file, or on the photographs themselves
(e.g., writing the date on the back of each print, including the date
in the file name for each image, etc.). Id. Sec. 202.3(b)(10)(iv)(A)-
(D). Alternatively, the applicant may provide a range of dates (e.g.,
February 25, 2015 through May 25, 2015), but only if the photographs
were published within three months before the date that the application
is received in the Office. Id. Sec. 202.3(b)(10)(vi). If the applicant
chooses to provide publication information on Form GR/PPh/CON, the
applicant may include up to 750 photographs in the claim. Id. Sec.
202.3(b)(10)(v). By contrast, if the applicant provides publication
information using any other method, there is no limit on the number of
photographs that may be submitted. Id. Sec. 202.3(b)(10)(v), (viii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ Form GR/PPh/CON is a continuation sheet for Form VA
specifically designed for providing information for a group
registration of published photographs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Initially, all applicants were required to file their claims using
a paper application submitted on Form VA. As discussed below in Section
III.A.1, the Office has established a pilot program
[[Page 86645]]
that allows applicants to submit their claims through the electronic
registration system. Id. Sec. 202.3(b)(10)(xi).
In all cases, the applicant must submit one copy of each photograph
that is included in the group, and all the photographs must be
submitted in the same format. Id. Sec. 202.3(b)(10)(x). The applicant
may submit the photographs in digital form by saving them on a CD-ROM
or DVD-ROM in a JPEG, GIF, TIFF, or PCD format.\4\ Alternatively, the
applicant may submit the photographs in a physical form, such as
prints, contact sheets, slides, photocopies, or even videotape. Id.
Sec. 202.20(c)(2)(xx)(B)-(H).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\4\ The regulation that currently governs the deposit
requirements for GRPPH does not mention other types of storage
devices, such as flash drives. 37 CFR 202.20(c)(2)(xx)(A).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
B. Other Registration Options
In addition to the group option for published photographs, there
are four other options for registering multiple photographs with the
same application. These options are summarized below.
1. Unpublished Collections
Since 1978 the Office has allowed applicants to register a number
of unpublished works with one application and one filing fee if the
works qualify as an ``unpublished collection.'' To qualify for this
option, the works must be unpublished, the works must have at least one
common author, the copyright claimant for each work and the collection
as a whole must be the same person or organization, the works must be
assembled in an orderly form, and the applicant must provide a single
title identifying the collection as a whole. Id. Sec.
203.3(b)(4)(i)(B). Photographers may use this option to register their
photographs if they satisfy these requirements, and at the present time
there is no limit on the number of photographs that may be included
within each collection. Under this option, the applicant may register
the works using the electronic registration system or a paper
application submitted on Form VA. Id. Sec. 202.3(b)(2).
In all cases, the applicant must submit one copy of each photograph
that is included in the collection. The applicant may submit the
photographs in digital form (e.g., uploading digital files to the
electronic registration system or mailing them to the Office on a CD-
ROM or DVD-ROM, etc.) or physical form (e.g., prints, slides,
photocopies, etc.), but all of the photographs must be submitted in the
same format. Id. Sec. 202.20(c)(2)(xx).
2. Group Registration for Contributions to Periodicals
Without prejudice to the Register's general authority to create
group registration options under Section 408(c)(2) at the Register's
discretion, Congress also directed the Register to create a group
option for works by the same individual author that were first
published as a contribution to a periodical. 17 U.S.C. 408(c)(2). In
response to this directive, the Office established a procedure known as
the ``group option for contributions to periodicals'' or ``GRCP.'' See
43 FR 965, 966-67 (Jan. 5, 1978). Photographers may use this option to
register their photographs if they satisfy the requirements set forth
in the regulation. First, all the photographs must be taken by the same
individual, and none of them can be a work made for hire. 37 CFR
202.3(b)(8)(i)(A)-(B). Second, all the photographs must be first
published as a contribution to a periodical (e.g., a newspaper, a
magazine, a journal, etc.) and they must be published within a twelve-
month period (e.g., June 1, 2014 through May 31, 2015). Id. Sec.
202.3(b)(8)(i)(C) & n.2. And, third, if the photographs were first
published before March 1, 1989, each photograph must contain an
appropriate copyright notice. Id. Sec. 202.3(b)(8)(i)(D).
Under the current regulation, there is no limit on the number of
photographs that may be registered under GRCP. The applicant must
complete a paper application using Form VA and Form GR/CP.\5\ Id. Sec.
202.3(b)(8)(ii)(A)-(B). The applicant must submit the photographs in
the precise form in which they were first published, and the copies
must be submitted in physical--rather than digital--form. See id. Sec.
202.3(b)(8)(i)(E). For example, the applicant may submit the entire
issue of the periodical that contains the photograph, the entire
section of the newspaper that contains the photograph, a photocopy of
the entire page from the periodical that contains the photograph, among
other formats.\6\ See id.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\5\ Form GR/CP is an adjunct form specifically designed for
providing information for a group registration of contributions to
periodicals.
\6\ The Office is issuing a separate notice of proposed
rulemaking (published elsewhere in this volume of the Federal
Register, and referred to herein as the ``GRCP Rulemaking'') that
invites comment on a proposed rule that will modify the group option
for contributions to periodicals. To be clear, the Office is not
proposing any changes to the GRCP regulation as part of this
rulemaking on group registration of photographs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. Group Registration for Photographic Databases
In 1989, the Office created a procedure that allows database owners
to register the updates and revisions to a database with one
application and one filing fee. 37 CFR 202.3(b)(5); 54 FR 13177 (Mar.
31, 1989). The Office refers to this procedure as the ``group database
option.'' In the late 1990s, some stock photography companies began
using this option to register databases that contain large numbers of
photographs. After consulting with representatives from the industry,
the Office concluded that the database option could potentially be used
to register a photographic database if certain requirements have been
met. The Office noted this understanding in an earlier notice of
proposed rulemaking that is discussed in Section III.A.1 below. See 76
FR 4072, 4075-76 (Jan. 24, 2011).
The requirements for the database option are extremely complex.\7\
Briefly stated, an applicant may register the updates or revisions that
were made to a database over a period of three months if the updates
and revisions are owned by the same claimant and if the general content
and organization of the updates and revisions are similar. 37 CFR
202.3(b)(5). The applicant must submit a detailed statement that
describes the content and organization of the database, and in the case
of a photographic database, the applicant must submit one copy of each
photograph that is included in the group. The applicant may submit an
online application or a paper application. The applicant may submit the
photographs in digital or physical form, but all the photographs must
be submitted in the same format. 37 CFR 202.20(c)(2)(xx).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\7\ For a detailed summary of these requirements, see section
1117 of the Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices, Third
Edition (hereinafter the ``Compendium'').
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A registration for a photographic database covers the authorship
involved in selecting, coordinating, and arranging the content of the
database as a whole. It also may cover the individual photographs that
are included within the database if the photographers transferred the
exclusive rights in their respective works to the owner of the
database, and if the selection, coordination, and/or arrangement of
those photographs is sufficiently creative. See Compendium section
1117.2. That said, the Office has questioned whether this practice
should be revised to limit the examination of a database to the
authorship involved in creating the selection, coordination, and
arrangement of the database as a whole and to exclude examination (and
thus, the prima facie validity) of a claim in the component elements of
the database.
[[Page 86646]]
See 77 FR 40268, 40269 (July 9, 2012); see also 76 FR at 4073. The
Office generally discourages photographers from registering their works
as part of a photographic database and instead encourages them to use
one of the other options discussed in this section, in part, because
they provide a better registration record for claims in the individual
component works within a database, as opposed to a claim in the
database itself as a compilation of data. See 77 FR at 40269 n.1; 76 FR
at 4073. Moreover, registering photographs as part of a photographic
database may limit the copyright owner's ability to seek certain
remedies in an infringement action. This issue is discussed in more
detail in Section III.G.3 below.
4. Collective Works
Applicants may register a number of photographs with one
application and one filing fee if they are part of a collective work.
The statute defines a collective work as ``a work, such as a periodical
issue, anthology, or encyclopedia, in which a number of contributions,
constituting separate and independent works in themselves, are
assembled into a collective whole.'' 17 U.S.C. 101. A collective work
may consist entirely of photographs, such as a book of photographs, an
exhibition catalog, or a retrospective book that contains photographs
taken by a particular photographer. A collective work also may combine
photographs with other types of authorship, such as a calendar,
textbook, coffee table book, or similar types of works.
Applicants may register a collective work with an online
application or a paper application. The claim may include photographs
taken by multiple photographers, but the applicant does not need to
name each photographer in the application and there is no limit on the
number of photographs that may be included within each claim. If the
claim is approved, the registration will cover the authorship involved
in selecting, coordinating, and arranging the content of the collective
work as a whole. It also may cover the individual photographs that are
included within the collective work if (i) the claimant owns the
copyright in both the individual photographs and the collective work as
a whole, and if (ii) the photographs have not previously been published
or registered. Although a registration for a collective work may cover
the individual photographs contained therein, this type of registration
may limit the copyright owner's ability to seek certain remedies in an
infringement action. This issue is discussed in more detail in Section
III.G.4 below.
III. The Proposed Rule
The Proposed Rule does several things. First, the Office is
proposing to amend the regulation that governs the group option for
published photographs to reflect certain technical upgrades that will
be made to the electronic registration system. Second, the Office is
proposing to create, for the first time, an equivalent group
registration option for unpublished photographs. This new procedure
will be known as the ``group option for unpublished photographs'' or
``GRUPH,'' and it will replace the option that currently allows
photographers to register their works as an unpublished collection.
These first two amendments will increase the efficiency of the
registration process for both published and unpublished photographs
alike by requiring applicants to submit their claims through the
electronic registration system. In addition, GRUPH will foster early
registration, thereby eliminating complex questions that arise when
published and unpublished photographs are commingled.
Third, the Office is proposing to update the deposit requirements
for the group options for published photographs and photographic
databases by requiring applicants to submit a digital copy of each
photograph that is included in the group, and a separate document
containing a sequentially numbered list that provides the title and
file name for each photograph in the group. Applicants may submit these
items by uploading them through the electronic system or by sending
them on a physical storage device. This same requirement will apply to
the new group option for unpublished photographs.
Finally, the Proposed Rule will memorialize the Office's
longstanding position regarding the scope of a group registration for
photographs.
Each of these proposals is discussed below.\8\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\8\ As mentioned above in footnote 6, the Office is issuing a
separate notice of proposed rulemaking involving the group option
for contributions to periodicals. The rule proposed in the GRCP
Rulemaking states that the Office may refuse to issue a group
registration or may cancel a group registration if it determines
that the applicant failed to comply with the relevant requirements
for a particular group option. These requirements will apply to any
group option that the Office creates under section 408 of the
Copyright Act, including GRCP, GRPPH, GRUPH, and the group option
for photographic databases.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
A. Application Requirements for Groups of Published Photographs (GRPPH)
and Groups of Unpublished Photographs (GRUPH)
1. Online Registration
In February 2015 the Office completed a comprehensive analysis of
its electronic registration system with input from technical experts
and stakeholders. This analysis will support the Office's long-term
goals of creating both a better interface and a better public record.
See U.S. Copyright Office, Office of the Chief Information Officer,
Report and Recommendations of the Technical Upgrades Special Project
Team (February 2015), available at https://copyright.gov/docs/technical_upgrades/usco-technicalupgrades.pdf; see also Technological
Upgrades to Registration and Recordation Functions, 78 FR 17722 (Mar.
22, 2013). In December 2015, the Register issued a strategic plan that
sets forth the Office's performance objectives for the next five years.
The plan provides a roadmap for re-envisioning almost all of the
services that the Office provides, including how applicants register
claims, submit deposits, record documents, share data, and access
expert resources. With respect to information technology, the plan
calls for ``a robust and flexible technology enterprise that is
dedicated to the current and future needs of a modern copyright
agency.'' U.S. Copyright Office, Strategic Plan 2016-2020: Positioning
the United States Copyright Office for the Future, at 35 (Dec. 1,
2015), available at https://copyright.gov/reports/strategic-plan/USCO-strategic.pdf. At the direction of Congress,\9\ the Office also
developed a detailed IT plan, and obtained public comments on specific
strategies, costs, and timelines for technology objectives. U.S.
Copyright Office, Provisional Information Technology Modernization Plan
and Cost Analysis (Feb. 29, 2016), available at https://copyright.gov/reports/itplan/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\9\ H.R. Rep. No. 114-110, at 16-17 (2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the meantime, the Office has made some enhancements to the
current electronic registration system that will benefit photographers,
the Office, and the public at large. When the electronic registration
system was introduced in 2007, it contained a ``standard'' application
(referred to herein as the ``standard online application''). Applicants
could use this application to register a single work; they also could
use this application to register a number of works as an unpublished
collection or as part of a collective work. See 72
[[Page 86647]]
FR 36883, 36885 (July 6, 2007). But the standard online application was
not meant to be used to register groups of published photographs,
photographic databases, or contributions to periodicals, because the
system was not designed to take in the information required for a group
claim. Instead, photographers were required to submit these types of
claims using a paper application submitted on Form VA (either alone or
together with Form GR/PPh/CON or Form GR/CP).
Photographers soon expressed interest in using the electronic
system, and beginning in 2010, some applicants began submitting large
numbers of photographs with the standard online application. Although
this application was not designed to handle group registrations, the
Visual Arts Division processed some of these claims in cases where the
application contained all the information required for a group claim.
Based on this experience, the Office issued an interim regulation in
2011 that established a pilot program allowing applicants to register
groups of published photographs and photographic databases with the
standard online application.\10\ 76 FR at 4074, 4075. Applicants that
participate in the pilot program may submit their claims through the
electronic system (rather than submitting a paper application),
provided that they obtain prior authorization from the Visual Arts
Division and follow the instructions from that Division concerning the
information that should be included in the application and the proper
method for submitting the deposit. 37 CFR 202.3(b)(5)(ii)(A),
(b)(10)(xi).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ The pilot program does not apply to the group option for
contributions to periodicals.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Office explained that, during the pilot, it would assess the
desirability and feasibility of allowing applicants to submit groups of
photographs through the electronic system on a permanent basis, and
invited public comment on the issue. 76 FR 5106 (Jan. 28, 2011). The
Professional Photographers of America (``PPA'') and other organizations
that represent photographers supported the pilot program, predicting
that the standard online application would require less time to
complete than a paper application, and that applicants would receive
their certificates in a more timely manner.\11\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\11\ PPA at 2, available at https://copyright.gov/rulemaking/databases/comments/professional-photographers-of-america.pdf. PPA
jointly submitted its comments with Commercial Photographers
International, the Society of Sport & Event Photographers, the
Student Photographic Society, Evidence Photographers International
Council, and the Stock Artists Alliance. Id. at 1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
While the pilot program was well-intentioned, it has been extremely
burdensome for both applicants and the Office. The standard online
application was designed to handle claims involving one work or a
limited number of works. Using the existing architecture to provide
title and publication information for hundreds or even thousands of
photographs is necessarily challenging for applicants who are
unfamiliar with the system. Examining these types of claims also
requires significantly more time. In some cases, registration
specialists have spent an entire day processing a single claim, which
has resulted in corresponding delays in issuing certificates of
registration for such claims. Moreover, the increasing demand on the
Office's limited resources has had an adverse effect on the examination
of other types of works within the Visual Arts Division.
To address these concerns, the Office has decided to eliminate the
pilot program for published photographs, and replace it with an online
application specifically designed for groups of published photographs.
(The pilot program for photographic databases will remain in effect for
the time being, though as discussed in Sections D.2 and G.3, the
deposit requirements for photographic databases will be modified in
some respects.) In addition, the Office has created a new online
application specifically designed for groups of unpublished
photographs.
Under the Proposed Rule, applicants will be required to use the
online application designated for GRPPH or GRUPH as a condition for
using either of these group options. To facilitate this transition, the
Office will contact each applicant that has participated in the pilot
program for published photographs and will notify them that the pilot
program will be replaced with a new procedure. The Office will provide
instructions on how to complete the new applications on its Web site
and in chapter 1100 of the Compendium. In addition, the Office will
make its staff available to groups or associations that are interested
in producing webinars or other educational programs for their members.
Once the Proposed Rule goes into effect, the Office will no longer
accept groups of published photographs or groups of unpublished
photographs that are submitted with a paper application on Form VA
(either with or without Form GR/PPh/CON).\12\ Likewise, the Office will
no longer accept these types of claims if they are submitted with a
standard online application, rather than the online application
designated for GRPPH or GRUPH.\13\ In such cases the Office will ask
the applicant to resubmit the photographs using the appropriate
application, which may affect the effective date of registration that
is assigned to the claim. The Office invites comment on this proposal,
including whether it should eliminate the paper application for these
group options, phase them out after a specified period of time, or
continue to offer them for photographers who prefer to use the paper-
based system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\12\ By contrast, Applicants may continue to use Form VA to
register a photographic database if they meet the eligibility
requirements for that option. Similarly, photographers may continue
to use Form VA to register an individual photograph or a collective
work, although the Office strongly encourages applicants to use the
online application rather than the paper form.
\13\ By contrast, applicants may continue to use the standard
online application to register a photographic database, as long as
they comply with the requirements for the pilot program.
Photographers may continue to use the standard application to
register photographs as part of a collective work. Likewise,
photographers may continue to use the standard online application to
register an individual photograph.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Relationship to Supplementary Registration Rulemaking
A supplementary registration is a special type of registration that
may be used ``to correct an error in a copyright registration or to
amplify the information given in a registration,'' including a
registration for a group of related works. 17 U.S.C. 408(d).
Specifically, it identifies an error or omission in an existing
registration (referred to herein as a ``basic registration'') and
places the corrected information or additional information in the
public record. The Office refers to this type of registration as a
``CA,'' which stands for ``correction and amplification.''
The Office is issuing a separate notice of proposed rulemaking
(published elsewhere in this volume of the Federal Register, and
referred to herein as the ``CA Rulemaking'') that will modify the
regulation that governs this procedure. Under the rule proposed in the
CA Rulemaking, applicants will be required to file an online
application in order to correct or amplify the information set forth in
a basic registration for any photograph that is capable of being
registered through the electronic system--even if the work was
originally registered with a paper application submitted on Form VA
(either with or without Form GR/PPh/CON).
[[Page 86648]]
If the rules proposed in the CA Rulemaking and in this proceeding
both go into effect, applicants will be required to file an online
application in order to correct or amplify a basic registration for
works registered under the GRPPH and GRUPH options. If an applicant
attempts to use a paper application, the Office will ask the applicant
to resubmit the claim using the online form. As discussed in Section
III.C.1 below, if the basic registration encompasses more than 750
photographs, multiple applications may need to be submitted to correct
or amplify that registration. Applicants will not need to contact the
Visual Arts Division in order to correct or amplify a basic
registration for a group of photographs registered under GRPPH or
GRUPH.
This online-filing requirement will also apply when correcting or
amplifying a basic registration for works registered under the pilot
program for group registration option for photographic databases.\14\
Applicants will need to contact the Visual Arts Division before filing
an application to correct or amplify a basic registration for a
photographic database. This is due to the fact a supplementary
registration for a photographic database will have to be submitted
under the pilot program. As discussed in Section III.A.1, the Visual
Arts Division closely monitors claims submitted under this program to
ensure that applicants complete the online application in an
appropriate manner.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ Under the rule proposed in the CA Rulemaking, the online
filing requirement for supplementary registrations will also apply
to basic registrations for a single photograph, a collection of
unpublished photographs, or a collective work that contains
photographs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Comments concerning this proposal should be submitted as part of
the CA Rulemaking, and should not be submitted as part of this
rulemaking on group registration of photographs.
3. Policy Considerations Supporting Online-Only Registration
A substantial majority of the U.S. population has access to the
internet,\15\ and the Office expects that most photographers will be
able to use the electronic system.\16\ That said, the Office recognizes
that millions of Americans do not have broadband service, and that the
Proposed Rule may impose a burden on photographers who fall within this
segment of the population.\17\ Nevertheless, the Office believes that
the benefits of requiring applicants to use the online application
designated for GRPPH or GRUPH outweigh the potential burden on
photographers who do not have direct access to the internet.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\15\ The Pew Research Center found that 84% of adults use the
internet, including 85% of the people in urban and suburban
communities and 78% of the people in rural communities. Pew Research
Center, Americans' Internet Access: 2000-2015, at 2, 10 (June 26,
2015), available at https://www.pewinternet.org/files/2015/06/2015-06-26_internet-usage-across-demographics-discover_FINAL.pdf.
\16\ Approximately 94% of the claims submitted in fiscal year
2015 were filed through the electronic system, while 6% of the
claims were submitted on a paper application.
\17\ The Federal Communications Commission (``FCC'') reported
that 17% of the population does not have access to a broadband
service with connection speeds of twenty-five megabits per second
(``mbps'') for downloads and three mbps for uploads. This figure
includes 8% of the people who live in urban areas, 53% of the people
in rural areas, and 63% of the people in U.S. territories and Tribal
lands. Federal Communications Commission, 2015 Broadband Progress
Report at 4 (Jan. 29, 2015), available at https://apps.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/FCC-15-10A1.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
As discussed above, the PPA and other organizations that represent
photographers expressed support for online registration in a prior
rulemaking. They stated that ``only a tiny fraction of photographers
(1% according to PPA member surveys)'' register their works with the
Office, in part, because the paper application takes too much time to
complete. PPA, supra note 11, at 1. Thus, requiring applicants to use
the online application will encourage broader participation in the
registration process.
If a photographer does not have broadband at home, at the home of a
relative, friend, or neighbor, or at her place of employment, there are
other options for registering large numbers of published or unpublished
photographs. If the copyright owner has a tablet or laptop, she could
complete and submit the online application at a coffee shop, a
bookstore, or any other place where wi-fi or cellular service is
available.\18\ She could log onto the electronic system at a public
library or other institution that provides computers with internet
access. Although the photographer would have to submit the application
through the electronic system and pay the filing fee through a secure
Web site (www.pay.gov), she would not necessarily have to submit her
photographs over the internet. As discussed in Section III.D.1.c, the
photographer could save her photographs onto a flash drive or other
storage device and mail it to the Office with the required shipping
slip that is generated by the electronic registration system.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ When filing an application for a supplementary registration
there is no need to upload a copy of the work that is covered by the
basic registration. Thus, applicants will be able to submit these
types of claims with a tablet or other wi-fi enabled device. In some
cases, the registration specialist may need to compare the
information provided in the application for supplementary
registration with the copy of the work that was submitted with the
application for the basic registration. For instance, this may be
necessary if the supplementary registration changes the publication
status of the work or adds additional authors to the registration
record. If the Office does not have a copy of the work in its
possession, the registration specialist may ask the applicant to
submit a replacement copy. See Compendium section 1802.9(C). But in
all cases, the replacement copy could be sent by first class mail,
courier, or hand delivery; the copy does not need to be uploaded to
the electronic system (though this would be an option if the
applicant has broadband service).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the alternative, the photographer could hire an attorney to
submit the application on her behalf, either by paying for the
attorney's services or by obtaining pro bono representation.\19\ The
Office also notes that a number of companies will prepare an
application and file it with the Office for a fee. These companies
typically provide this service for copyright owners who wish to
register a single work, but they could conceivably expand their
offering to include groups of photographs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ The Office does not require applications to be prepared or
submitted by an attorney. In certain special cases the Office may
suggest that the copyright owner consider seeking legal advice, but
the Office does not furnish the names of copyright attorneys,
publishers, agents, or other similar information. See 37 CFR
201.2(a)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The Office's decision to offer a group option for photographers is
entirely discretionary, and Congress gave the Office broad authority to
set the requirements for these types of claims. 17 U.S.C. 408(c)(1).
For the foregoing reasons, the Office believes that requiring
applicants to submit an online application as a condition for seeking a
group registration for a group of photographs is a reasonable trade-off
for improving the overall efficiency of the group registration process.
Nonetheless, the Office invites comment on this aspect of the Proposed
Rule.
B. Filing Fee for GRPPH and GRUPH
The filing fee for registering groups of published or unpublished
photographs will be $55, which is the amount the Office currently
charges for a group of published photographs submitted with an online
application under the pilot program.\20\ 37 CFR 201.3(c)(3)(i).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ Likewise, the filing fee for registering a photographic
database will remain unchanged. Applicants will continue to pay $55
if the claim is submitted with an online application under the pilot
program, and will continue to pay $65 if the claim is submitted with
a paper application on Form VA. 37 CFR 201.3(c)(3).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In 2012 the Office conducted a study pursuant to section 708 of the
Copyright Act, which authorizes the Register to establish, adjust, and
recover fees for certain services that the Office provides
[[Page 86649]]
to the public. Initially, the Office proposed to increase the filing
fee for a group of published photographs, but after weighing the
concerns expressed by photographers the Office decided to keep the fee
for submitting an online application under the pilot program at $55 and
the fee for submitting a paper application at $65. The Office noted
that photographers ``expressed significant concern about the impact of
fees on their ability to protect their works,'' given ``the number of
works they produce and must register in order to receive the full range
of judicial remedies for infringement.'' U.S. Copyright Office,
Proposed Schedule and Analysis of Copyright Fees To Go Into Effect On
Or About April 1, 2014, at 15 (Nov. 14, 2013), available at https://www.copyright.gov/docs/newfees/USCOFeeStudy-Nov13.pdf.
Section 708(b) authorizes the Register to adjust the fees that the
Office charges for certain services (including the fee for seeking a
group registration), but before doing so the Register must conduct a
study of the costs incurred by the Office for registering claims,
recording documents, and providing other services. In conducting this
study, the Register must consider the timing of any fee adjustments and
the Office's authority to use the fees consistent with its budget. 17
U.S.C. 708(b)(1). Section 708(b) provides that the Register may adjust
these fees no ``more than that necessary to cover the reasonable costs
incurred by the Copyright Office for . . . [such services], plus a
reasonable inflation adjustment to account for any estimated increase
in costs.'' 17 U.S.C. 708(b)(2). It also provides that the Office must
submit a proposed fee schedule to Congress and that the Office may
implement the schedule 120 days thereafter (unless Congress enacts a
law stating that it does not approve the schedule). 17 U.S.C.
708(b)(5).
Once the Proposed Rule has been implemented, the Office will
monitor the cost of processing groups of published and unpublished
photographs to determine if future fee adjustments may be warranted.
The Office will use this information in conducting its next fee study.
C. Eligibility Requirements for GRPPH and GRUPH
This section discusses the eligibility requirements for the group
option for published photographs and the group option for unpublished
photographs. Applicants that fail to satisfy these requirements will
not be permitted to use these options.
1. Photographs That May Be Included in the Group
Among the key requirements of the Proposed Rule are that all the
works in the group must be photographs, the group must contain no more
than 750 photographs, and the applicant must specify the total number
of photographs that are included in the group. These requirements must
be satisfied, regardless of whether the applicant uses the group option
for published or unpublished photographs.
This represents a change in policy. Under the current regulation,
applicants may register a group of published photographs by submitting
a paper application on Form VA and may use Form GR/PPh/CON to provide
titles, publication dates, and other pertinent information for each
photograph. Completing Form GR/PPh/CON is optional, although it does
provide certain advantages. See Compendium section 1116.2. When using
Form GR/PPh/CON, the applicant may only include up to 750 photographs
in each group. By contrast, if the applicant uses any other method for
submitting a group of published photographs--such as completing the
standard online application under the pilot program or submitting a
paper application on Form VA without completing Form GR/PPh/CON--there
is no limit on the number of photographs that may be included in the
group. Likewise, when an applicant submits a number of photographs as
an unpublished collection under Sec. 202.3(b)(4)(i)(B), there is no
limit on the number of photographs that may be included in the claim
(regardless of whether the applicant submits the claim through the
electronic system or with a paper application).
The Office recognizes that photographers are prolific creators. A
photographer may take dozens or even hundreds of copyrightable images
in a single session and thousands of images over the course of a week,
a month, or a year. The Office created a group option for photographs,
in part, because it is unrealistic and cost-prohibitive to expect
photographers to register all of their images on an individual basis.
At the same time, the Office recognizes that an effective public record
must provide sufficient information about each claim. Photographers who
register their works in a timely manner may be entitled to claim
statutory damages in an infringement action and the granularity of the
public record is critical to that determination.
Given resource limitations and the modest filing fee for this group
option, the Office must impose some limit on the total number of
photographs that may be submitted under the group option for published
photographs and the new option for unpublished photographs. Based on
its experience with Form GR/PPh/CON, the Office has determined that a
limit of 750 photographs strikes an appropriate balance between the
interests of photographers and the administrative capabilities of the
Office.
To ensure that applicants do not attempt to circumvent the 750-
photograph limit the Office proposes to eliminate the pilot program
that allows applicants to submit groups of published photographs with
the standard online application.\21\ If an applicant submits more than
750 photographs or fails to use the online application designated for
GRPPH, the Office will ask the applicant to resubmit the claim using
the appropriate application and will ask the applicant to limit the
claim to no more than 750 photographs.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\21\ The Proposed Rule only eliminates the pilot program for
GRPPH. As discussed in Section III.A.1, the pilot program for
photographic databases will remain in effect for the time being.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the same reason, the Office will no longer register a group of
unpublished photographs as an unpublished collection. If an applicant
submits more than 750 photographs or fails to use the online
application designated for GRUPH, the Office will ask the applicant to
resubmit the claim using the appropriate application and will ask the
applicant to limit the number of photographs in the group.
The limit on the number of photographs, in turn, will affect the
procedure for correcting or amplifying a basic registration for a group
of published photographs. As noted in Section III.A.2, the rule
proposed in the CA rulemaking will require applicants to file an online
application in order to seek a supplementary registration for a group
of photographs. If the basic registration covers 750 photographs or
fewer, the applicant will be able to correct or amplify the
registration record with a single supplementary registration submitted
through the online system. But if the basic registration was issued
before the Proposed Rule goes into effect, and if that registration
covers more than 750 photographs, multiple supplementary registrations
may be needed to correct or amplify the record for those works.
2. Authorship and Ownership
Another key requirement is that all the photographs in the group
must be taken by the same photographer.
[[Page 86650]]
Applicants will not be allowed to submit groups of photographs taken by
different photographers (e.g., 300 photographs by Raul Martinez, 300
photographs by Jose Rodriguez, and 150 photographs by Diego Hernandez).
Likewise, the Office will not accept applications claiming that two or
more individuals jointly created each photograph in the group as a
joint work.\22\ These requirements are consistent with the regulation
that currently governs GRPPH. See 37 CFR 202.3(b)(10)(ii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ Joint authors will not be able to use GRPPH or GRUPH. The
Office is willing to entertain these types of claims if the
applicant submits a separate application for each individual
photograph (i.e., not using the group option) and provides a
sufficient basis for the claim of joint authorship.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In all cases, the claim will be limited to ``photographs'' and that
term will be added automatically to the application by the electronic
system. The system will not accept claims in ``digital editing,''
``compilation,'' or any other form of authorship other than
``photographs.'' \23\ Likewise, the Office will not allow applicants to
add other forms of authorship to the claim during the examination
process or with a supplementary registration.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ To assert a claim in ``digital editing'' applicants may
submit a separate application and a separate filing fee for each
photograph (rather than submitting a group of photographs under
GRPPH or GRUPH). In appropriate cases, applicants may assert a claim
in a ``compilation'' of photographs by registering them as part of a
collective work, such as a book of photographs, an exhibition
catalog, a calendar, or the like.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In all cases, the copyright claimant for each photograph must be
the same person or organization.\24\ Specifically, the claimant must be
the author of all the photographs in the group, or the copyright owner
that owns all the exclusive rights in those photographs.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\24\ This requirement appears in the current regulation
governing groups of published photographs. 37 CFR 202.3(b)(10)(i).
\25\ The term ``claimant'' is defined in Sec. 202.3(a)(3)(iii)
of the regulations. That provision contains a footnote stating that
a person or organization that has obtained ``the contractual right
to claim legal title to the copyright'' may be named as claimant. 37
CFR 202.3(a)(3)(ii) n.1. The Office proposed to eliminate this
footnote in a prior rulemaking. See Registration of Copyright:
Definition of Claimant, 77 FR 29257, 29259 (May 17, 2012). The
Office expects to issue a final rule in that proceeding before the
new regulations governing GRPPH and GRUPH go into effect.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Applicants will be allowed to register a group of photographs if
the claimant obtained all the exclusive rights in those works through a
transfer of ownership. Likewise, applicants will be allowed to register
a group of photographs as works made for hire (i) if all the
photographs are identified in the application as works made for hire,
(ii) if all the photographs were created by the same individual for the
same employer, and (iii) if the photographer and the employer are both
listed in the name of author field (e.g., ``Advertising Agency LLC,
employer for hire of John Smith'').\26\ However, the Office will not
allow applicants to combine works made for hire with works obtained
through a transfer of ownership. Similarly, the electronic system will
not allow works created by one photographer to be combined with works
created by a different photographer (even if those works are owned by
the same claimant).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ This requirement appears in the current regulation
governing groups of published photographs. 37 CFR 202.3(b)(10)(ix).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For example, if an advertising agency acquired a group of
photographs from a particular photographer through an assignment of
copyright and acquired another group of photographs taken by the same
photographer through a work made for hire agreement, the agency could
register those photographs under GRPPH or GRUPH only by separating the
photographs into two groups and submit a separate application for each
group (i.e., one application with the work made for hire question
answered ``yes'' and the other with the question answered ``no'').
Likewise, if the agency hired five freelancers to take photographs
pursuant to a work made for hire agreement, the agency should separate
the photographs into five separate groups (i.e., one group for each
photographer) and submit a separate application for each group.
3. Publication and Titles
The group options for published and unpublished photographs are
designed to be mutually exclusive of each other. Under the Proposed
Rule, an applicant will be allowed to register a group of unpublished
photographs if all the photographs are unpublished, and will be allowed
to register a group of published photographs if all the photographs are
published. Applicants will not be allowed to combine published and
unpublished photographs in the same claim. In addition, in the case of
published photographs, all the works must be published within the same
nation and within the same calendar year (e.g., January 1 through
December 31, 2016).\27\ When completing the online application,
applicants will be asked to verify this information by providing the
earliest date and the most recent date that photographs were published
during the year.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ The current regulation governing GRPPH states that the
photographs must be published within the same calendar year, but
does not indicate whether the photographs must be published within
the same nation. 37 CFR 202.3(b)(10)(iii).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
To register a group of published or unpublished photographs,
applicants will be required to provide a title for the group as a
whole, and will be required to include this information in the online
application itself. For example, the applicant may provide a title that
identifies the photographer and the month/year that the photographs
were created, such as ``Jack Jackson's photos May through July 2016,''
or one that identifies the subject matter of the photographs, such as
``Tropical Images from Hawaii.''
In addition to this basic information about the group of
photographs, applicants will be required to submit a separate document
in Excel format (``.xls''), Portable Document Format (``PDF''), or
other electronic format that may be specifically approved by the Office
that contains a sequentially numbered \28\ list with a title, file name
(matching the file name of the corresponding deposit copy), and in the
case of GRPPH, the month and year of publication \29\ (e.g., ``January
2016,'' ``February 2016,'' etc.) for each photograph in the group.\30\
This list must be submitted together with the copies of the
photographs, by uploading them through the electronic system or by
sending them on a physical storage device. The specific requirements of
this list are discussed below.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ Each entry on the list must be sequentially numbered (i.e.,
1, 2, 3, etc.); these numbers can be entered automatically with most
spreadsheet programs. The Office will use this information to count
the number of photographs that are included in the deposit, and to
ensure that it matches the number of photographs claimed in the
application.
\29\ Applicants will not be required to provide a precise date
of publication for each photograph in the group (i.e., month, day,
and year). This represents a change in the current policy for
registering a group of published photographs. Under the current
regulation for GRPPH, applicants generally are required to provide a
month, day, and year of publication for each photograph, although
they may provide a range of dates if the application is received
within three months after the first date of publication specified in
the application.
\30\ The specific requirements for the numbered list are
discussed below in Section III.D.1.b.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, applicants will be encouraged--but not required--to
provide title and publication information in the online application
itself. The Office will provide instructions on its Web site that will
explain how to copy this information from the numbered list into the
appropriate fields in the online application.
Although applicants will not be required to provide title and
publication information in the online application, there are certain
advantages to doing so.
[[Page 86651]]
If the applicant includes the titles in the online application, they
will appear on the certificate of registration and in the Office's
online database. This will improve the quality of the registration
record by making the information more accessible to the public. If this
information appears on the certificate, and if the certificate is
issued within five years after the publication of a particular
photograph, the certificate will create a legal presumption that the
work was published in the month and year specified on the certificate.
See 17 U.S.C. 410(c).
By contrast, if the applicant provides title and publication
information in the numbered list, but does not include that information
in the online application itself, the titles and publication dates will
not appear on the certificate of registration or the Office's online
database (although the Office will keep a copy of the numbered list in
its files). In such cases, the Office will add an annotation to the
record, such as ``Regarding title: deposit contains complete list of
titles that correspond to the individual photographs included in this
group.''
In comments regarding the Office's pilot program for electronic
registration of photographs, the PPA and other organizations stated
that photographers struggle with the definition of ``publication'' and
``the public,'' and find it difficult to determine whether their works
are published or unpublished, particularly when they are distributed in
digital form. PPA, supra note 11, at 2-3. They explained that their
members are reluctant to register their works, in part, because they
worry about the possible consequences of classifying an unpublished
photograph as a published work (or vice versa). They asked the Office
to address this ``barrier to registration'' by providing clarification
and guidance on these issues. Id. at 3.
The new group option for unpublished photographs will help mitigate
this problem by encouraging early registration. The Office strongly
encourages photographers to register their works before they are
published (i.e., before any distributions have occurred), because this
avoids much of the confusion concerning publication and the treatment
of published works. The new group option supports this objective by
giving photographers a convenient and cost-effective means for
registering their photographs before they are distributed to the
public.
In addition, the Office released a comprehensive revision of the
Compendium in 2014, which sets forth and explains key administrative
duties of the Copyright Office under title 17 of the United States
Code. See 79 FR 78911, 78911-12 (Dec. 31, 2014). Among other
improvements, the Compendium contains an entire chapter on publication.
This chapter provides a detailed discussion of the definition of
``publication'' and ``the public'' and specific examples of how the
Office applies these definitions to photographs and other types of
works. See generally Compendium, chapter 1900. The Compendium provides
guidance on how to determine whether a work is published or unpublished
when it is posted on the internet or distributed online. See id.
section 1008.3. It also explains how to correct an error in a
registration if the applicant mistakenly claims that the work was
published or unpublished. See id. sections 1802.6(I), 1802.7(C).
In the future, the Office intends to develop a portal on its Web
site that will provide photographers with pertinent information on a
wide range of copyright issues. In developing these resources it would
be helpful to learn more about the specific methods that photographers
use to distribute their works to their customers and the general
public. The Office previously asked for written comments on this issue
in the Visual Works Inquiry, and it welcomes additional input as part
of this rulemaking.
D. The Deposit Requirement
The Proposed Rule will modify the deposit requirements for the
group option for published photographs and the group option for
photographic databases, and it will establish similar requirements for
the new option for unpublished photographs. These requirements are
summarized below.\31\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\31\ The rule proposed in the GRCP Rulemaking will modify the
deposit requirements for registering a group of contributions to
periodicals in some respects. By contrast, the Office is not
proposing to make any changes to the deposit requirements for an
individual photograph or a collective work, such as a calendar or a
book of photographs. To register an individual photograph, the
applicant should submit two complete copies of the best edition if
the photograph has been published in the United States or one
complete copy if the photograph is unpublished. To register a
collective work, the applicant should submit one complete copy of
the collective work (if it is unpublished) or two complete copies of
the best edition (if the work has been published in the United
States). See generally Compendium, chapter 1500.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. Deposit Requirements for GRPPH and GRUPH
a. Digital Photographs
Under the Proposed Rule, applicants will be required to submit a
digital copy of each photograph that is included in a group of
published photographs (GRPPH) or a group of unpublished photographs
(GRUPH). Applicants will be required to submit each photograph in one
of the following formats: JPEG, GIF, TIFF, or PCD. The Office will no
longer accept physical copies, such as prints, contact sheets, slides,
photocopies, videotapes, or clippings from a newspaper, magazine, or
other publication. This should not impose a significant burden on
photographers because it appears that the vast majority of them use
digital cameras.
b. Numbered List of Photographs
In addition, as noted above, applicants will be required to submit
a separate document containing a sequentially numbered list that
identifies the title and file name--and in the case of published
photographs, the month and year of publication--for each photograph in
the group. The Office will provide a template on its Web site that may
be used to prepare this list. The title and file name for a particular
photograph may be the same, and may consist solely of numbers, letters,
and spaces that were automatically assigned by the camera or a unique
identifier that has been assigned to the image by a third party, such
as the PLUS Registry. As noted above, the file names specified in the
list must match the corresponding file names in the deposit copy.
However, the file name should not contain slashes or any other form of
punctuation. Including punctuation marks in the file name (other than
spaces) may cause a system error that may prevent the Office from
viewing the photographs. The Office also discourages applicants from
stating ``Untitled,'' ``No Title,'' or the like, because interested
parties typically search for works by title and it may be impossible to
locate a particular photograph unless a meaningful title has been
provided.
The Office will use the list to examine and document the claim,
particularly in cases where the applicant does not provide title or
publication information in the online application itself. In addition,
the Office may use the list to locate and retrieve the deposit in the
event it is needed for litigation or other legitimate purposes. For
these reasons, the titles and file names specified in the list must
correspond to the titles and files names for the actual photographs
that are included in the deposit. In this respect, the Proposed Rule
builds upon a suggestion that the Digital Media
[[Page 86652]]
Licensing Association (``DMLA'') offered in a prior rulemaking.\32\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\32\ DMLA was previously known as the Picture Archive Council of
America (``PACA''). In a prior rulemaking, it stated that works
deposited with the Office should be accessible upon request so that
parties can easily determine whether a particular photograph is
covered by a particular registration. PACA at 1, available at https://copyright.gov/rulemaking/databases/comments/picture-archive-council-of-america.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
The list must be contained in an electronic file in Excel format
(``.xls''), Portable Document Format (``PDF''), or other electronic
format that may be specifically approved by the Office. The file name
for the list must include the title of the group as a whole and the
eleven-digit case number that is automatically assigned to the
application by the electronic system (e.g., '' [Title of Group] Case
Number 12345678910''). The Office will provide further guidance
regarding the preferred format and naming conventions for these file
names on its Web site and in Chapter 1100 of the Compendium. When
completing the online application, applicants will be asked to provide
the file name for this document in the application itself. This will
help the Office connect the numbered list with the relevant
application, and to distinguish it from the files that contain the
digital photographs.
c. Procedure for Submitting the Digital Photographs and the Numbered
List of Photographs
Applicants will be required to submit the files containing the
digital photographs together with the file that contains the
sequentially numbered list of photographs. Applicants may upload these
files through the electronic system. Alternatively, they may save them
onto a physical storage device, such as a flash drive or a CD-R or DVD-
R, and send it to the Office by mail, by courier, or by hand delivery
together with the required shipping slip.
When submitting files through the electronic system, applicants
will be strongly encouraged to save them in a .zip file and then upload
the .zip file to the system. In all cases, the size of each uploaded
file must not exceed 500 megabytes, although the applicant may
digitally compress the photographs to comply with this limitation.
When submitting files on a flash drive or other storage device,
applicants must send that device in the same package with the shipping
slip that is generated by the electronic system. If the applicant fails
to include the required shipping slip, the Office may be unable to
connect the storage device with the appropriate application. In such
cases, the applicant will be required to pay an additional fee to
search for the deposit and connect it with the application. If the
deposit cannot be located, the applicant will be required to resubmit
the storage device, which may change the effective date of registration
for the claim.
Packages that are delivered to the Office by mail or by courier
will be irradiated to destroy possible contaminants, such as anthrax.
This process may damage files stored on electronic media. To avoid this
result, applicants will be strongly encouraged to send physical storage
devices to the Office in boxes rather than envelopes. Additional
information concerning the recommended procedure for delivering
physical deposits by mail or by courier will be provided in the
Compendium.
2. Deposit Requirements for Photographic Databases
The Proposed Rule will impose the same deposit requirements on a
database that consists predominantly of photographs. Specifically,
database owners will be required to submit a digital copy of each
photograph that is included in the claim, and a separate document
containing a sequentially numbered list that identifies the title and
file name--and in the case of published photographs, the month and year
of publication--for each photograph.\33\ Database owners will be
required to submit digital copies, regardless of whether they intend to
file an online application under the pilot program (in which case the
photographs and the numbered list may be uploaded to the electronic
system or submitted on a physical storage device with the required
shipping slip) or a paper application (in which case the photographs
and the numbered list may be submitted on a physical storage device
together with Form VA).\34\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\33\ As discussed in Section III.D.1.b, the Office will provide
a standard template that may be used to prepare the numbered list of
photographs.
\34\ When submitting an online application the storage device
must be accompanied by the shipping slip that is generated by the
electronic system. When submitting a paper application, the device
must be accompanied by Form VA.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
E. When should a group registration be filed?
An application for a group registration may be filed at any time.
However, a photograph must be registered in a timely manner to seek
statutory damages and attorney's fees in an infringement action.
Specifically, a copyright owner typically may seek these remedies if a
photograph was registered (i) before the infringement commenced or (ii)
within three months after the first publication of that work. See 17
U.S.C. 412.
In the case of unpublished photographs, the Office strongly
encourages photographers to register their works before sharing them
with any other party. By doing so, photographers preserve the ability
to seek statutory damages and attorney's fees in subsequent
infringement disputes involving those works.
In the case of published photographs, the Office encourages
photographers to submit their claims every three months (instead of
filing on an annual or semi-annual basis), and in each case, to file
the claim within three months after the earliest date of publication
specified in the application. For example, if a photographer first
published his or her photographs on June 1, 2016, it would be advisable
to submit a complete application, deposit, and filing fee on or before
September 1, 2016. By doing so, the photographer would preserve his or
her ability to seek statutory damages and attorney's fees for any
infringements that began after the effective date of registration
(i.e., after September 1, 2016), as well as any infringements that
occurred within three months after the date of publication (i.e.,
between June 1, 2016 and September 1, 2016).
F. The Scope of a Group Registration
The Proposed Rule memorializes the Office's longstanding position
regarding the scope of a registration for a group of published
photographs, and it confirms that the Office will take the same
position regarding the group option for unpublished photographs.
When the Office issues a group registration, it prepares one
certificate of registration for the entire group and assigns one
registration number to that certificate. The Proposed Rule clarifies
that a registration for a group of published or unpublished photographs
covers each photograph in the group, and that each photograph is
registered as a separate ``work.'' This understanding is consistent
with the statutory scheme. The legislative history makes clear that
group registration was ``a needed and important liberalization of the
law [then] in effect,'' which to that point had required ``separate
registrations where related works or parts of a work are published
separately.'' H.R. Rep. No. 94-1476, at 154 (1976). In particular,
Congress noted that ``the technical necessity for separate applications
and fees has caused copyright owners to forego copyright altogether.''
Id. Given that context, it would be anomalous for works
[[Page 86653]]
registered as part of a group registration application to be given less
protection than if they had been registered through separate
applications.
For similar reasons, the Proposed Rule also clarifies that when a
group of photographs is registered under GRPPH or GRUPH, the group as a
whole is not considered a compilation or a collective work under
sections 101, 103(b), or 504(c)(1) of the Copyright Act. The group is
merely an administrative classification created solely for the purpose
of registering multiple photographs with one application and one filing
fee. See 17 U.S.C. 408(c)(1) (``Th[e] administrative classification of
works has no significance with respect to the subject matter of
copyright or the exclusive rights provided by this title.''). Although
an applicant may exercise some judgment in selecting the photographs
that are included within a particular group, that decision does not
necessarily constitute copyrightable authorship. Instead, the selection
is based on the regulatory requirements for these group options, and
any coordination or arrangement of the photographs is merely an
administrative formality that facilitates the examination of the works.
Likewise, the Proposed Rule clarifies that the group is not
considered a derivative work under sections 101, 103(b), or 504(c)(1)
of the Copyright Act. When a group of photographs is compiled for the
purpose of facilitating registration, those works are not ``recast,
transformed, or adapted'' in any way, and the group as a whole is not
``a work based upon one or more preexisting works'' because there is no
copyrightable authorship in simply following the administrative
requirements for GRPPH or GRUPH. 17 U.S.C. 101 (definition of
``derivative work'').
G. Group Registration of Published and Unpublished Photographs
Distinguished From Other Registration Options
This section discusses the key differences between the options for
registering a group of published or unpublished photographs as compared
to the options for registering an unpublished collection, a group of
contributions to periodicals, a photographic database, or a collective
work.
1. Group Registration of Unpublished Photographs vs. Unpublished
Collections
The group option for unpublished photographs is intended to replace
the option that currently allows an applicant to register a number of
photographs as an unpublished collection. Once the Proposed Rule goes
into effect, the Office will no longer accept an application to
register photographs under Sec. 202.3(b)(4)(i)(B) of the regulations,
regardless of whether the photographs are submitted with a standard
application or a paper application (although the Office will continue
to accept applications to register other types of works under this
provision).
As explained, the GRUPH option provides a more efficient mechanism
for capturing information about photographs, and incorporating that
information into the public record. Requiring applicants to use this
option may also provide photographers with certain legal benefits.
When an applicant submits photographs via the unpublished
collection option, and asserts a claim in both the individual
photographs as well as the selection and arrangement of the collection
as whole, the Office will register the claim as an unpublished
collective work, rather than an unpublished collection. A collective
work is--by definition--a form of compilation. 17 U.S.C. 101 (``The
term `compilation' includes collective works.''). Section 504(c)(1) of
the Copyright Act states that a copyright owner may be entitled to
recover ``an award of statutory damages for all infringements involved
in [an infringement] action, with respect to any one work,'' but
``[f]or the purposes of this subsection, all the parts of a compilation
. . . constitute one work.'' 17 U.S.C. 504(c)(1). In other words, when
a number of photographs are registered as an unpublished collective
work, the copyright owner would be entitled to seek only one award of
statutory damages in an infringement action, rather than a separate
award for each photograph.
In contrast, as noted above in Section III.F, when a number of
photographs are registered under the GRUPH option, each photograph is
registered as a separate work. For purposes of registration, the group
as a whole is not considered a collective work or compilation, and
thus, the individual photographs within the group would not be subject
to the limitation on statutory damages set forth in section 504(c)(1).
Instead, a registration for a group of unpublished photographs is
treated as a separate registration for each photograph that is included
within the group.
2. Group Registration of Published Photographs vs. Group Registration
for Contributions to Periodicals
The group option for published photographs is not intended to alter
or replace the group option for contributions to periodicals.
Photographers may continue to register their works as a group of
published photographs or a group of contributions to periodicals, as
long as they satisfy the relevant requirements for each option.
There are some notable differences between these registration
options. While a group of published photographs may include no more
than 750 images, there is no limit on the number of photographs that
may be included within a group of contributions to periodicals.
Moreover, a group of published photographs may include photographs that
were published during the same calendar year, while a group of
contributions to periodicals may include photographs that were
published over a twelve-month period--even if that period extends from
one calendar year to the next (e.g., September 1, 2015 through August
31, 2016). In addition, to be eligible for GRPPH, the photographs may
be published in any manner, but there is no need to specify the medium
of publication and no need to submit the photographs in the specific
form in which they were first published. To be eligible for GRCP, the
photographs must be first published in a periodical (e.g., a newspaper,
a magazine, etc.), the applicant must provide pertinent information
about each periodical (e.g., title, issue number, publication date,
etc.), and the applicant must submit a copy of the photographs as they
appeared in each publication (e.g., a copy of the entire periodical, a
copy of an entire section from a newspaper, etc.).
The Office generally encourages applicants to use GRPPH, in part,
because the deposit requirements for published photographs are more
flexible than the deposit requirements for GRCP. Regardless of whether
the applicant uses GRPPH or GRCP, the registration will cover all the
photographs that are included within the group.
3. Group Registration of Photographs vs. Group Registration for
Photographic Databases
As noted above, the Proposed Rule makes certain modifications to
the deposit requirement for databases that predominantly consist of
photographs. The Proposed Rule will not change any of the other
requirements for these types
[[Page 86654]]
of claims. See 37 CFR 202.3(b)(5); 202.20(c)(2)(vii)(D)(8).
Although the Office will continue to accept these claims, the
Office strongly encourages photographers, stock photography companies,
database providers, and other interested parties to register their
works with the group option for published or unpublished photographs--
rather than the database option--for several reasons. Many photography
Web sites and catalogs do not qualify as a database, and therefore, are
not eligible for the group option for photographic databases. For
purposes of registration, a database is defined ``as a compilation of
digital information comprised of data, information, abstracts, images,
maps, music, sound recordings, video, other digitized material, or
references to a particular subject or subjects. In all cases, the
content of a database must be arranged in a systematic manner, and it
must be accessed solely by means of an integrated information retrieval
program or system with the following characteristics.'' Compendium
section 1117.1. First, ``a query function must be used to access the
content.'' Id. Second, ``[t]he information retrieval program or system
must yield a subset of the content, or it must organize the content
based on the parameters specified in each query.'' Id.
Stock photography Web sites or catalogs that merely display
photographs do not satisfy these requirements and therefore are not
considered databases for the purpose of registration. In most cases,
users may access all the content on a Web site or in a catalog by
scrolling or browsing through the individual images or categories of
related images. Id. section 1002.6. By contrast, users cannot access
the content of a database in its entirety. Id. Instead, they must use a
query function to identify specific content within the database, and
they must use an information retrieval system to extract the content
that matches the user's search criteria. Id. While a user may view the
entire content of a Web site or catalog, a user may view the content of
a database only to the extent that it matches a particular query that
the user entered into the information retrieval system. Id. While some
Web sites may provide a search feature that may be used to locate
particular images or categories of images, these types of features do
not qualify as an information retrieval system nor do they transform an
ordinary Web site into a database, because these features are not the
sole means for accessing the images posted on the site. See id. If the
Office determines that a particular Web site, catalog, or other work
does not qualify as a database, the Office will refuse to register the
work as a database or as a group of updates or revisions to a
photographic database.
Copyright owners also should consider the following issue before
registering their photographs as part of a photographic database. As
noted above in Section III.G.1, the Copyright Act states that a
copyright owner may be entitled to recover ``an award of statutory
damages for all infringements involved in [an infringement] action,
with respect to any one work,'' but ``[f]or the purposes of this
subsection, all the parts of a compilation . . . constitute one work.''
17 U.S.C. 504(c)(1). A database is--by definition--a compilation. See
Alaska Stock, LLC v. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Co., 747 F.3d
673, 676 (9th Cir. 2014) (concluding that a photographic database is a
collective work); see also Compendium section 1117.1 (same).
Consequently, when a group of photographs is registered as a database,
the copyright owner may be entitled to seek only one award of statutory
damages for the database as a whole--rather than a separate award for
each photograph--even if the defendant infringed all the photographs
that are covered by the registration.
By contrast, when a copyright owner registers a group of
photographs under GRPPH or GRUPH, the registration covers each
photograph in the group, but the group itself is not a compilation
within the meaning of the Copyright Act. Therefore, any claim for
infringement would not be subject to the limitation set forth in
Section 504(c)(1) of the Copyright Act. For these reasons, the group
options for published and unpublished photographs provide significant
benefits, while avoiding the potential downside of registering a number
of works as part of a photographic database.
4. Group Registration of Photographs vs. Collective Works
The Proposed Rule will not change the requirements for registering
a number of photographs as part of a collective work, such as a book of
photographs, a travel guide, or the like. Applicants may continue to
register these types of works with a standard application submitted
through the electronic system or with a paper application submitted on
Form VA.
Registration of photographs as part of a collective work differs in
many respects from group registration of photographs. A registration
for a collective work may include photographs taken by multiple
photographers (even if the photographers are not explicitly named in
the application), and there is no limit on the number of photographs
that may be included within each claim. If the claim is approved, the
registration will cover the authorship involved in selecting,
coordinating, and/or arranging the content of the collective work as a
whole. It also may cover the individual photographs that appear in the
collective work if the claimant owns the copyright in those images and
the collective work as a whole, and if the photographs have not been
previously published or registered.
There are some drawbacks to registering photographs as a collective
work. As discussed in Section III.G.1, a collective work is--by
definition--a compilation. As such, these types of works are subject to
the limitation set forth in section 504(c)(1) of the Copyright Act.
When a number of photographs are registered as part of a collective
work, the copyright owner may be entitled to receive only one award of
statutory damages in an infringement action, even if the defendant
infringed all the photographs that appear in that work (regardless of
whether the collective work is published or unpublished). By contrast,
when a group of photographs are registered under GRPPH or GRUPH, the
copyright owner would not be subject to the collective-work limitation
in section 504(c)(1). For this reason, photographers may wish to
register their photographs under GRPPH or GRUPH, even if those works
also may be eligible for registration as part of a collective work.
H. Technical Amendments
The Proposed Rule will move the regulation governing published
photographs from Sec. 202.3 to Sec. 202.4.\35\ In the future, the
Office intends to move all regulations governing the various group
options that have been implemented under section 408(c) of the
Copyright Act to Sec. 202.4. This change is intended to improve the
readability of the existing regulations, but it does not represent a
substantive change in policy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\35\ The Office recently issued a notice of proposed rulemaking
that would remove the current text of Sec. 202.4 and reserve that
section for later use. See Copyright Office Technical Amendments, 81
FR 67940, 67942 (Oct. 3, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In addition, the Proposed Rule incorporates the definitions of
``claimant'' and ``Class VA'' that are set forth in Sec. 202.3, and it
confirms that an application for a group of photographs may be
submitted by any of the parties listed in Sec. 202.3(c)(1), namely (i)
the author or copyright claimant of those
[[Page 86655]]
works, (ii) the owner of any of the exclusive rights in those works, or
(iii) a duly authorized agent of any author, claimant, or owner of
exclusive rights.
IV. Conclusion
The Proposed Rule will allow broader participation in the
registration system by expanding the class of works that may be
registered as a group, increase the efficiency of the registration
process, and create a more robust record of the claim. The Office
invites public comment on these proposed changes.
List of Subjects
37 CFR Part 201
Copyright, General provisions.
37 CFR Part 202
Copyright, Preregistration and registration of claims to copyright.
Proposed Regulation
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the U.S. Copyright
Office proposes amending 37 CFR parts 201 and 202, as follows:
PART 201--GENERAL PROVISIONS
0
1. The authority citation for part 201 is amended to read as follows:
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 702.
0
2. Amend Sec. 201.3 by:
0
a. Redesignating paragraphs (c)(3) through (18) as paragraphs (c)(4)
through (19), respectively.
0
b. Adding new paragraph (c)(3).
0
c. Revising newly redesignated paragraph (c)(4).
The revisions and additions to read as follows:
Sec. 201.3 Fees for registration, recordation, and related services,
special services, and services performed by the Licensing Division.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(3) Registration of a claim in a group of published photographs or 55
a claim in a group of unpublished photographs.....................
(4) Registration for a database that predominantly consists of
photographs and updates thereto:..................................
(i) Electronic filing.............................................. 55
(ii) Paper filing.................................................. 65
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
PART 202--PREREGISTRATION AND REGISTRATION OF CLAIMS TO COPYRIGHT
0
3. The authority citation for part 202 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 408(f), 702.
0
4. Amend Sec. 202.3 by:
0
a. In paragraph (b)(3) removing the phrase ``, subject to the
limitations in paragraph (b)(10)(v) of this section'' .
0
b. Revising paragraph (b)(4)(ii).
0
c. Removing and reserving paragraph (b)(10).
0
d. In the text of paragraph (c)(2), removing the reference to footnote
``6'' and adding in its place a reference to footnote ``5''.
0
e. In paragraph (c)(2), revising footnote 5.
The revisions to read as follows:
Sec. 202.3 Registration of copyright.
* * * * *
(b) * * *
(4) * * *
(ii) In the case of an application for registration made under
paragraphs (b)(4) through (b)(10) of this section or under Sec. 202.4,
the ``year of creation,'' ``year of completion,'' or ``year in which
creation of this work was completed,'' means the latest year in which
the creation of any copyrightable element was completed.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
\5\ In the case of an application to register a group of
newspapers, newsletters, contributions to periodicals, or
photographs under paragraphs (b)(7) or (9) of this section or under
Sec. 202.4, the deposit shall comply with the respective
requirements specified in those paragraphs.
* * * * *
0
6. Revise Sec. 202.4 to read as follows:
Sec. 202.4 Group Registration.
(a) This section prescribes conditions for issuing a registration
for a group of related works under section 408(c) of title 17 of the
United States Code.
(b) Definitions. For purposes of this section, the terms copy and
work made for hire have the meanings set forth in section 101 of title
17 of the United States Code, and the terms claimant and Class VA have
the meanings set forth in Sec. 202.3(a)(3) and (b)(1)(iii).
(c) [Reserved]
(d) [Reserved]
(e) [Reserved]
(f) [Reserved]
(g) [Reserved]
(h) [Reserved]
(i) Group registration of unpublished photographs. Pursuant to the
authority granted by 17 U.S.C. 408(c)(1), the Register of Copyrights
has determined that a group of unpublished photographs may be
registered in Class VA with one application, one filing fee, and the
required deposit, if the following conditions are met:
(1) All the works in the group must be photographs.
(2) The group must include no more than 750 photographs, and the
application must specify the total number of photographs that are
included in the group.
(3) All the photographs must be created by the same photographer.
(4) The copyright claimant for all the photographs must be the same
person or organization.
(5) The photographs may be registered as works made for hire if all
the photographs are identified in the application as such, if all the
photographs were created by the same photographer for the same
employer, and if the application identifies both the photographer and
the employer in the name of author field (e.g., ``ABC Corporation,
employer for hire of John Doe'').
(6) All the photographs must be unpublished.
(7) The applicant must provide a title for the group as a whole.
(8) The applicant must complete and submit the online application
designated for a group of unpublished photographs. (The Office will not
register a group of unpublished photographs as an unpublished
collection under Sec. 202.3(b)(4)(i)(B).) The application may be
submitted by any of the parties listed in Sec. 202.3(c)(1).
(9) The appropriate filing fee, as required by Sec. 201.3(c) of
this chapter, must be included with the application or charged to an
active deposit account.
(10) The applicant must submit one copy of each photograph in one
of the following formats: JPEG, GIF, TIFF, or PCD. The file name for a
particular photograph may consist of letters, numbers, and spaces, but
the file name should not contain any other form of punctuation. The
photographs may be uploaded to the electronic registration system
together with the required numbered list, preferably in a .zip file
containing all the photographs. The file size for each uploaded file
must not exceed 500 megabytes; the photographs may be compressed to
comply with this requirement. Alternatively, the photographs and the
required numbered list may be saved on a physical storage device, such
as a flash drive, CD-R, or DVD-R, and delivered to the Copyright Office
together with the required shipping slip generated by the electronic
registration system.
(11) The applicant must submit a sequentially numbered list
containing a title and file name for each photograph in the group
(matching the corresponding file names for each photograph specified in
paragraph (i)(10)). The title and file name for a particular photograph
may be the same.
[[Page 86656]]
The numbered list must be contained in an electronic file in Excel
format (.xls), Portable Document Format (PDF), or other electronic
format approved by the Office, and the file name for the list must
contain the title of the group and the case number assigned to the
application by the electronic registration system (e.g., ``Title Of
Group Case Number 16283927239.xls'').
(j) Group registration of published photographs. Pursuant to the
authority granted by 17 U.S.C. 408(c)(1), the Register of Copyrights
has determined that a group of published photographs may be registered
in Class VA with one application, one filing fee, and the required
deposit, if the following conditions are met:
(1) All the works in the group must be photographs.
(2) The group must include no more than 750 photographs, and the
application must specify the total number of photographs that are
included in the group.
(3) All the photographs must be created by the same photographer.
(4) The copyright claimant for all the photographs must be the same
person or organization.
(5) The photographs may be registered as works made for hire if all
the photographs are identified in the application as such, if all the
photographs were created by the same photographer for the same
employer, and if the application identifies both the photographer and
the employer in the name of author field (e.g., ``XYZ Corporation,
employer for hire of Jane Doe'').
(6) All the photographs must be published within the same nation
and within the same calendar year, and the applicant must specify the
earliest and latest date that the photographs were published during the
year.
(7) The applicant must provide a title for the group as a whole.
(8) The applicant must complete and submit the online application
designated for a group of published photographs. The application may be
submitted by any of the parties listed in Sec. 202.3(c)(1).
(9) The appropriate filing fee, as required by Sec. 201.3(c) of
this chapter, must be included with the application or charged to an
active deposit account.
(10) The applicant must submit one copy of each photograph in one
of the following formats: JPEG, GIF, TIFF, or PCD. The file name for a
particular photograph may consist of letters, numbers, and spaces, but
the file name should not contain any other form of punctuation. The
photographs may be uploaded to the electronic registration system
together with the required numbered list, preferably in a .zip file
containing all the photographs. The file size for each uploaded file
must not exceed 500 megabytes; the photographs may be compressed to
comply with this requirement. Alternatively, the photographs and the
required numbered list may be saved on a physical storage device, such
as a flash drive, CD-R, or DVD-R, and delivered to the Copyright Office
together with the required shipping slip generated by the electronic
registration system.
(11) The applicant must submit a sequentially numbered list
containing the title, file name, and month and year of publication for
each photograph in the group (matching the corresponding file names for
each photograph specified in paragraph (j)(10)). The title and file
name for a particular photograph may be the same. The numbered list
must be contained in an electronic file in Excel format (.xls),
Portable Document Format (PDF), or other electronic format approved by
the Office, and the file name for the list must contain the title of
the group and the case number assigned to the application by the
electronic registration system (e.g., ``Title Of Group Case Number
16283927239.xls'').
(k) [Reserved]
(l) [Reserved]
(m) [Reserved]
(n) The scope of a group registration. When the Office issues a
group registration under paragraphs (i) or (j) of this section, the
registration covers each work in the group and each work is registered
as a separate work. For purposes of registration, the group as a whole
is not considered a compilation, a collective work, or a derivative
work under sections 101, 103(b), or 504(c)(1) of title 17 of the United
States Code.
0
7. Amend Sec. 202.20 by:
0
a. Revising paragraph (c)(2)(vii)(D)(8); and.
0
b. Removing paragraph (c)(2)(xx).
The revision to read as follows:
Sec. 202.20 Deposit of copies and phonorecords for copyright
registration.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
(vii) * * *
(D) * * *
(8) In the case of an application for registration of a database
that consists predominantly of photographs (including a group
registration for revised or updated versions of such a database),
``identifying portions'' shall instead consist of all individual
photographs included in the claim. Photographs must be submitted in
digital form in one of the following formats: JPEG, GIF, TIFF, or PCD.
In addition, the applicant must submit a sequentially numbered list
containing the title and file name--and if the photographs have been
published, the month and year of publication--for each photograph in
the group. The title and file name for a particular photograph may be
the same and may consist of letters, numbers, and spaces, but the file
name should not contain any other form of punctuation. The numbered
list must be contained in an electronic file in Excel format (.xls),
Portable Document Format (PDF), or other electronic format approved by
the Office. The file name for the list must contain the title of the
database, and the case number assigned to the application by the
electronic registration system, if any (e.g., ``Title Of Database Case
Number 162883927239.xls''). The photographs and the numbered list may
be uploaded to the electronic registration system with the permission
and under the direction of the Visual Arts Division, preferably in a
.zip file containing these materials. The file size for each uploaded
file must not exceed 500 megabytes; the photographs may be compressed
to comply with this requirement. Alternatively, the photographs and the
numbered list may be saved on a physical storage device, such as a
flash drive, CD-R, or DVD-R, and delivered to the Copyright Office
together with the required shipping slip generated by the electronic
registration system or with a paper application submitted on Form VA.
* * * * *
Dated: November 22, 2016.
Sarang V. Damle,
General Counsel and Associate Register of Copyrights.
[FR Doc. 2016-28706 Filed 11-30-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410-30-P