Supplementary Registration, 86656-86662 [2016-28701]
Download as PDF
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
86656
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 231 / Thursday, December 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
The numbered list must be contained in
an electronic file in Excel format (.xls),
Portable Document Format (PDF), or
other electronic format approved by the
Office, and the file name for the list
must contain the title of the group and
the case number assigned to the
application by the electronic registration
system (e.g., ‘‘Title Of Group Case
Number 16283927239.xls’’).
(j) Group registration of published
photographs. Pursuant to the authority
granted by 17 U.S.C. 408(c)(1), the
Register of Copyrights has determined
that a group of published photographs
may be registered in Class VA with one
application, one filing fee, and the
required deposit, if the following
conditions are met:
(1) All the works in the group must be
photographs.
(2) The group must include no more
than 750 photographs, and the
application must specify the total
number of photographs that are
included in the group.
(3) All the photographs must be
created by the same photographer.
(4) The copyright claimant for all the
photographs must be the same person or
organization.
(5) The photographs may be registered
as works made for hire if all the
photographs are identified in the
application as such, if all the
photographs were created by the same
photographer for the same employer,
and if the application identifies both the
photographer and the employer in the
name of author field (e.g., ‘‘XYZ
Corporation, employer for hire of Jane
Doe’’).
(6) All the photographs must be
published within the same nation and
within the same calendar year, and the
applicant must specify the earliest and
latest date that the photographs were
published during the year.
(7) The applicant must provide a title
for the group as a whole.
(8) The applicant must complete and
submit the online application
designated for a group of published
photographs. The application may be
submitted by any of the parties listed in
§ 202.3(c)(1).
(9) The appropriate filing fee, as
required by § 201.3(c) of this chapter,
must be included with the application
or charged to an active deposit account.
(10) The applicant must submit one
copy of each photograph in one of the
following formats: JPEG, GIF, TIFF, or
PCD. The file name for a particular
photograph may consist of letters,
numbers, and spaces, but the file name
should not contain any other form of
punctuation. The photographs may be
uploaded to the electronic registration
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:51 Nov 30, 2016
Jkt 241001
system together with the required
numbered list, preferably in a .zip file
containing all the photographs. The file
size for each uploaded file must not
exceed 500 megabytes; the photographs
may be compressed to comply with this
requirement. Alternatively, the
photographs and the required numbered
list may be saved on a physical storage
device, such as a flash drive, CD–R, or
DVD–R, and delivered to the Copyright
Office together with the required
shipping slip generated by the
electronic registration system.
(11) The applicant must submit a
sequentially numbered list containing
the title, file name, and month and year
of publication for each photograph in
the group (matching the corresponding
file names for each photograph specified
in paragraph (j)(10)). The title and file
name for a particular photograph may
be the same. The numbered list must be
contained in an electronic file in Excel
format (.xls), Portable Document Format
(PDF), or other electronic format
approved by the Office, and the file
name for the list must contain the title
of the group and the case number
assigned to the application by the
electronic registration system (e.g.,
‘‘Title Of Group Case Number
16283927239.xls’’).
(k) [Reserved]
(l) [Reserved]
(m) [Reserved]
(n) The scope of a group registration.
When the Office issues a group
registration under paragraphs (i) or (j) of
this section, the registration covers each
work in the group and each work is
registered as a separate work. For
purposes of registration, the group as a
whole is not considered a compilation,
a collective work, or a derivative work
under sections 101, 103(b), or 504(c)(1)
of title 17 of the United States Code.
■ 7. Amend § 202.20 by:
■ a. Revising paragraph (c)(2)(vii)(D)(8);
and.
■ b. Removing paragraph (c)(2)(xx).
The revision to read as follows:
digital form in one of the following
formats: JPEG, GIF, TIFF, or PCD. In
addition, the applicant must submit a
sequentially numbered list containing
the title and file name—and if the
photographs have been published, the
month and year of publication—for each
photograph in the group. The title and
file name for a particular photograph
may be the same and may consist of
letters, numbers, and spaces, but the file
name should not contain any other form
of punctuation. The numbered list must
be contained in an electronic file in
Excel format (.xls), Portable Document
Format (PDF), or other electronic format
approved by the Office. The file name
for the list must contain the title of the
database, and the case number assigned
to the application by the electronic
registration system, if any (e.g., ‘‘Title Of
Database Case Number
162883927239.xls’’). The photographs
and the numbered list may be uploaded
to the electronic registration system
with the permission and under the
direction of the Visual Arts Division,
preferably in a .zip file containing these
materials. The file size for each
uploaded file must not exceed 500
megabytes; the photographs may be
compressed to comply with this
requirement. Alternatively, the
photographs and the numbered list may
be saved on a physical storage device,
such as a flash drive, CD–R, or DVD–R,
and delivered to the Copyright Office
together with the required shipping slip
generated by the electronic registration
system or with a paper application
submitted on Form VA.
*
*
*
*
*
Dated: November 22, 2016.
Sarang V. Damle,
General Counsel and Associate Register of
Copyrights.
[FR Doc. 2016–28706 Filed 11–30–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410–30–P
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
§ 202.20 Deposit of copies and
phonorecords for copyright registration.
Copyright Office
*
37 CFR Parts 201, 202
*
*
*
*
(c) * * *
(2) * * *
(vii) * * *
(D) * * *
(8) In the case of an application for
registration of a database that consists
predominantly of photographs
(including a group registration for
revised or updated versions of such a
database), ‘‘identifying portions’’ shall
instead consist of all individual
photographs included in the claim.
Photographs must be submitted in
PO 00000
Frm 00043
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
[Docket No. 2016–9]
Supplementary Registration
U.S. Copyright Office, Library
of Congress.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
AGENCY:
The U.S. Copyright Office is
proposing to amend the regulation
governing supplementary registration to
reflect certain technical upgrades that
will soon be made to the electronic
SUMMARY:
E:\FR\FM\01DEP1.SGM
01DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 231 / Thursday, December 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
registration system. In most cases
applicants will be required to submit an
online application in order to correct or
amplify the information set forth in a
basic registration. This will increase the
efficiency of the supplementary
registration process for both applicants
and the Office alike. In addition, the
Office is amending the regulation to
codify and update certain practices that
are set forth in the Compendium of U.S.
Copyright Office Practices, Third
Edition and to improve the readability
of the regulation.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule
must be made in writing and must be
received in the U.S. Copyright Office no
later than January 3, 2017.
ADDRESSES: For reasons of government
efficiency, the Copyright Office is using
the regulations.gov system for the
submission and posting of public
comments in this proceeding. All
comments are therefore to be submitted
electronically through regulations.gov.
Specific instructions for submitting
comments are available on the
Copyright Office Web site at https://
copyright.gov/rulemaking/
supplementary-registration/. If
electronic submission of comments is
not feasible due to lack of access to a
computer and/or the Internet, please
contact the Office using the contact
information below for special
instructions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Robert J. Kasunic, Associate Register
and Director of Registration Policy and
Practice, by telephone at (202) 707–
8040; or Erik Bertin, Deputy Director of
Registration Policy and Practice, by
telephone at 202–707–8040.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 408(d) of the Copyright Act
authorizes the Register of Copyrights
(the ‘‘Register’’) to establish ‘‘formal
procedures for the filing of an
application for supplementary
registration.’’ 17 U.S.C. 408(d). A
supplementary registration is a special
type of registration that may be used ‘‘to
correct an error in a copyright
registration or to amplify the
information given in a registration.’’ Id.
Specifically, it identifies an error or
omission in an existing registration
(referred to herein as a ‘‘basic
registration’’) and places the corrected
information or additional information in
the public record.
When the U.S. Copyright Office (the
‘‘Office’’) issues a supplementary
registration, it does not cancel or replace
the basic registration or the registration
number for that registration. Likewise,
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:51 Nov 30, 2016
Jkt 241001
the Office does not change the
information set forth in the basic
registration or the public record for that
registration. Instead, as specified by
statute, the basic registration and the
supplementary registration coexist with
each other in the public record, and
‘‘the information contained in a
supplementary registration augments
but does not supersede that contained in
the earlier registration.’’ Id.
II. The Proposed Rule
A. Application for Supplementary
Registration
1. Online Registration
The Office is proposing to amend the
regulation that governs the procedure
for seeking a supplementary registration
(the ‘‘Proposed Rule’’). Under the
Proposed Rule, in most cases, applicants
will be required to file an online
application in order to correct or
amplify the information set forth in a
basic registration.
The Office has allowed and
encouraged applicants to register their
works through the electronic
registration system since 2007. See 72
FR 36883 (July 6, 2007). When the
Office introduced this system, it could
be used only to seek a basic registration.
To seek a supplementary registration,
applicants had to submit a paper
application using Form CA. 37 CFR
201.5(c)(1), (c)(2). In February 2015 the
Office completed a comprehensive
analysis of its electronic registration
system with input from technical
experts and stakeholders. This analysis
will support the Office’s long-term goals
of creating both a better interface and a
better public record. See U.S. Copyright
Office, Office of the Chief Information
Officer, Report and Recommendations
of the Technical Upgrades Special
Project Team (Feb. 2015), available at
https://copyright.gov/docs/
technical_upgrades/uscotechnicalupgrades.pdf; see also 78 FR
17722 (Mar. 22, 2013). In December
2015 the Register issued a strategic plan
that sets forth the Office’s performance
objectives for the next five years. The
plan provides a roadmap for reenvisioning almost all of the services
that the Office provides, including how
applicants register claims, submit
deposits, record documents, share data,
and access expert resources. With
respect to information technology, the
plan calls for ‘‘a robust and flexible
technology enterprise that is dedicated
to the current and future needs of a
modern copyright agency.’’ U.S.
Copyright Office, Strategic Plan 2016–
2020: Positioning the United States
Copyright Office for the Future, at 35
PO 00000
Frm 00044
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
86657
(Dec. 1, 2015), available at https://
www.copyright.gov/reports/strategicplan/sp2016-2020.html. At the direction
of Congress,1 the Office has also
developed a detailed IT plan, and
obtained public comments on specific
strategies, costs, and timelines for
technology objectives. U.S. Copyright
Office, Provisional Information
Technology Modernization Plan and
Cost Analysis (Feb. 29, 2016), available
at https://copyright.gov/reports/itplan/.
In the meantime, the Office has made
some enhancements to the current
system that will improve the versatility
of the supplementary registration
process. Under the Proposed Rule,
applicants will be required to use the
online registration system to file a
supplementary registration for any types
of works that are capable of being
registered through the electronic system.
This online filing requirement will thus
apply to supplementary registrations for
literary works (e.g., fiction, nonfiction,
poetry, etc.), single issues of a serial
publication (e.g., periodicals,
magazines, newsletters, journals, etc.),
works of the visual arts (e.g.,
photographs, maps, technical drawings,
etc.), works of the performing arts (e.g.,
musical works, dramatic works,
choreographic works, pantomimes,
motion pictures and other audiovisual
works, etc.), and sound recordings. See
37 CFR 202.3(b). The online filing
requirement will also extend to
supplementary registrations for
collective works, works registered under
the unit of publication option, and
works registered as an unpublished
collection. See 37 CFR 202.3(b)(4). It
will also apply to supplementary
registrations for groups of serials,2
newspapers, or newsletters,3 groups of
published photographs,4 or groups of
1 H.R.
Rep. No. 114–110, at 16–17 (2015).
37 CFR 202.3(b)(6)(v).
3 Although the current regulations state that an
application for a group of newspaper or newsletter
issues must be submitted with a paper application,
the Office is able to process these types of claims
through the electronic registration system, and has
in fact been doing so since December 14, 2012. See
37 CFR 202.3(b)(7)(i)(B), (9)(viii). The Office intends
to amend the regulations in a future rulemaking to
reflect these recent upgrades.
4 In 2012 the Office issued an interim regulation
that established a pilot program for applicants that
register large numbers of photographs using the
group option for published photographs (referred to
herein as ‘‘GRPPH’’) and the group option for
photographic databases. 76 FR 4072, 4074, 4075
(Jan. 24, 2011). Applicants that participate in the
pilot program may submit their photographs
through the electronic system, provided that they
obtain prior authorization from the Visual Arts
Division and follow the instructions from that
Division concerning the information that should be
included in the application. 37 CFR
202.3(b)(10)(xi). While the pilot program was well2 See
E:\FR\FM\01DEP1.SGM
Continued
01DEP1
86658
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 231 / Thursday, December 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
updates and revisions to a photographic
database.5 In the near future, the online
filing requirement will apply to
supplementary registrations for groups
of unpublished photographs,6 and
groups of contributions to periodicals.7
If the Office subsequently decides to
move registrations for other classes of
works into the electronic system,
supplementary registrations for those
works will also be subject to this same
requirement. In short, use of the online
supplementary registration application
will be required for most works.
Moreover, applicants will generally be
required to use the online registration
system to file a supplementary
registration even if the work was
originally registered using a paper
application.8 Instructions for
completing the online application will
be provided in the electronic system
and in Chapter 1800 of the
Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office
intentioned, it has been extremely burdensome for
both applicants and the Office. Therefore, the Office
is issuing a separate notice of proposed rulemaking
(published elsewhere in this volume of the Federal
Register, and referred to herein as the ‘‘Photo
Rulemaking’’) that will modify the regulation that
governs GRPPH. Among other changes, the rule
proposed in the Photo Rulemaking will require
applicants to submit an online application
specifically designed for GRPPH claims, instead of
submitting their photographs through the pilot
program. (By contrast, the pilot program for
photographic databases will remain in effect—at
least for the time being.)
5 Applicants may register a photographic database
through the electronic system by participating in
the pilot program mentioned in footnote 4. 76 FR
at 4074, 4075; 37 CFR 202.3(b)(5)(ii)(A).
6 The rule proposed in the Photo Rulemaking will
establish a new group registration option for
unpublished photographs (referred to herein as
‘‘GRUPH’’). In order to use this option, applicants
will be required to submit an online application
specifically designed for GRUPH claims, instead of
submitting a paper application.
7 The Office is issuing a separate notice of
proposed rulemaking (published elsewhere in this
volume of the Federal Register, and referred to
herein as the ‘‘GRCP Rulemaking’’) on a proposed
rule that will modify the group option for
contributions to periodicals (‘‘GRCP’’). Among other
changes, the rule proposed in the GRCP Rulemaking
will require applicants to submit an online
application specifically designed for GRCP claims,
instead of submitting a paper application.
8 As discussed above in footnote 4, the rule
proposed in the Photo Rulemaking will modify the
requirements for registering a group of published
photographs. Among other things, applicants will
be allowed to submit no more than 750 photographs
with each application. The limit on the number of
photographs, in turn, will affect the procedure for
correcting or amplifying an existing registration for
a group of published photographs. If the basic
registration covers 750 photographs or less, the
applicant will be able to correct or amplify the
registration record with a single supplementary
registration. By contrast, multiple supplementary
registrations may be needed in cases where the
basic registration had been issued before the
issuance of a final rule in the Photo Rulemaking
and where the basic registration covers more than
750 photographs.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:51 Nov 30, 2016
Jkt 241001
Practices, Third Edition (hereinafter
‘‘Compendium’’).9
Once the Proposed Rule goes into
effect, applicants will not be allowed to
submit a paper application on Form CA
to correct or amplify the basic
registration for any types of works that
are capable of being registered through
the electronic system. If the Office
receives such a paper application, it will
ask the applicant to resubmit the claim
using the online application.
To correct or amplify the registration
record for works that cannot be
registered through the electronic system,
applicants will be required to submit a
paper application using Form CA.10
This includes group registrations issued
under 37 CFR 202.3(b)(5) for a database
that does not consist predominantly of
photographs,11 and GATT registrations
issued under 37 CFR 202.12 for a
foreign work restored to copyright
protection under the Uruguay Round
Agreements Act.12 It also includes a
renewal registration for a work
registered or first published before
January 1, 1978.13 While instructions for
completing Form CA are provided with
Form CA and in section 1802.8 of the
Compendium, the specific requirements
for the paper application will no longer
be listed in the regulation itself.
2. Policy Considerations Supporting
Online-Only Registration
A substantial majority of the U.S.
population has access to the internet,14
9 Under the Proposed Rule, applicants will be
required to obtain prior authorization and
instructions from the Visual Arts Division if they
intend to correct or amplify the information set
forth in a basic registration for a photographic
database. This is due to the fact that a
supplementary registration for a photographic
database will be processed under the pilot program
mentioned in footnote 4. The Visual Arts Division
will continue to monitor claims submitted under
this program to ensure that applicants complete the
online application in an appropriate manner.
10 A supplementary registration cannot be used to
correct or amplify the registration record for a
vessel design or a mask work. The Office has no
authority and no procedure for correcting
substantive errors in these types of registrations.
See 17 U.S.C. 1319; see also 71 FR 46402 (Aug. 14,
2006). However, if the applicant made a clerical or
typographical error in an application for a vessel
design, the owner of the registered design or its
duly authorized agent may be able to correct the
error by submitting an application for a certificate
of correction using Form DC. See 37 CFR
212.8(a)(3), (c)(2).
11 Currently, applicants must submit these types
of claims using a paper application ‘‘that best
reflects the subject matter of the material in the
database.’’ 37 CFR 202.3(b)(5)(ii)(A).
12 Currently, applicants must submit these types
of claims using a paper application submitted on
Form GATT. 37 CFR 202.12(c)(2).
13 Currently, applicants must submit these types
of claims using a paper application submitted on
Form RE. 37 CFR 202.17(g)(1).
14 The Pew Research Center found that 84% of
adults use the internet, including 85% of the people
PO 00000
Frm 00045
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
and the Office expects that most
copyright owners will be able to use the
electronic registration system.15
However, the Office recognizes that
millions of Americans do not have
broadband service, and that the
Proposed Rule may impose a burden on
copyright owners who fall within this
segment of the population.16
Nevertheless, the Office believes that
the benefits of phasing-out the paper
application and replacing it with an
online application outweigh the
potential burden on copyright owners
who do not have direct access to the
internet.
Paper applications are extremely
burdensome for both applicants and the
Office. Describing an error or omission
in a basic registration can be tedious
and time consuming, especially when
the applicant needs to make a
significant number of changes to the
registration record. The Office routinely
receives applications that are hundreds
of pages long, such as when a stock
photography company wants to add
thousands of titles to the record for a
photographic database. Examining these
applications imposes tremendous
burdens on the Office, because each
correction or amplification must be
copied from Form CA and entered into
the record by hand. In some cases,
registration specialists have spent
several days on a single application.
This increasing demand on the Office’s
limited resources causes delays in
issuing supplementary registrations, and
it prevents specialists from examining
other types of claims thereby increasing
the overall backlog within the Office.
If a copyright owner does not have
broadband at home, at the home of a
relative, friend, or neighbor, or at his
place of employment, there are other
options for submitting an application for
supplementary registration. If the
copyright owner has a tablet or laptop,
he could complete and submit the
online application at a coffee shop, a
in urban and suburban communities and 78% of the
people in rural communities. Pew Research Center,
Americans’ Internet Access: 2000–2015 (June 26,
2015), available at https://www.pewinternet.org/
2015/06/26/americans-internet-access-2000-2015/c.
15 Approximately 94% of the claims filed in fiscal
year 2015 were submitted through the electronic
system, while 6% of the claims were submitted
with a paper application.
16 The Federal Communications Commission
(‘‘FCC’’) reported that 17% of the population does
not have access to a broadband service with
connection speeds of twenty-five megabits per
second (‘‘mbps’’) for downloads and three mbps for
uploads. This figure includes 8% of the people who
live in urban areas, 53% of the people in rural
areas, and 63% of the people in U.S. territories and
Tribal lands. Federal Communications Commission,
2015 Broadband Progress Report at 4 (Jan. 29, 2015),
available at https://www.fcc.gov/reports/2015broadband-progress-report.
E:\FR\FM\01DEP1.SGM
01DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 231 / Thursday, December 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
bookstore, or any other place where wifi or cellular service is available.17 He
also could log onto the electronic
registration system by going to a public
library that provides computers with
internet access.
In the alternative, the copyright owner
could hire an attorney to submit the
application on his behalf, either by
paying for the attorney’s services or by
obtaining pro bono representation.18
The Office also notes that a number of
companies will prepare and submit an
application for a fee. These companies
typically provide this service for
copyright owners seeking a basic
registration, but they could conceivably
expand their offering to include
supplementary registrations.
For the foregoing reasons, the Office
believes that requiring applicants to use
the online application is a reasonable
trade-off for improving the overall
efficiency of the supplementary
registration process. The Office invites
comment on this proposal, including
whether the Office should eliminate the
paper application for seeking a
supplementary registration, phase out
this option after a specified period of
time, or continue to offer this option for
applicants who prefer to use the paperbased system.
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
B. Fees
Under the Proposed Rule, the
applicant will be required to pay the
same filing fee, regardless of whether
the application is submitted through the
electronic registration system or on
Form CA. In addition, the applicant may
be required to pay a fee to locate and
obtain a copy of the basic registration
that is referenced in the application.
Each of these fees is discussed below.
17 When filing an application for a supplementary
registration there is no need to upload a copy of the
work that is covered by the basic registration. Thus,
applicants will be able to submit these types of
claims with a tablet or other wi-fi enabled device.
In some cases, the registration specialist may need
to compare the information provided in the
application for supplementary registration with the
copy of the work that was submitted with the
application for the basic registration. For instance,
this may be necessary if the supplementary
registration changes the publication status of the
work or adds additional authors to the registration
record. If the Office does not have a copy of the
work in its possession, the registration specialist
may ask the applicant to submit a replacement
copy. See Compendium section 1802.9(C). But in all
cases, the replacement copy could be sent by first
class mail, courier, or hand delivery; the copy does
not need to be uploaded to the electronic system
(though this would be an option if the applicant has
broadband service).
18 The Office does not require applications to be
prepared or submitted by an attorney. In certain
special cases the Office may suggest that the
copyright owner consider seeking legal advice, but
the Office does not furnish the names of copyright
attorneys, publishers, agents, or other similar
information. See 37 CFR 201.2(a)(2).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:51 Nov 30, 2016
Jkt 241001
1. Filing Fee
In 2012 the Office conducted a study
pursuant to section 708 of the Copyright
Act, which authorizes the Register to
establish, adjust, and recover fees for
certain services that the Office provides
to the public. After reviewing its costs,
the Office decided to increase the filing
fee for a supplementary registration
from $100 to $130.19 The Office
explained that paper applications ‘‘are
considerably less efficient than
electronic registration’’ and that the
prior fee did not offset a sufficient
percentage of the costs associated with
these types of claims. U.S. Copyright
Office, Proposed Schedule and Analysis
of Copyright Fees To Go Into Effect On
Or About April 1, 2014, at 18 (Nov. 14,
2013), available at https://
www.copyright.gov/docs/newfees/
USCOFeeStudy-Nov13.pdf. For
example, in Fiscal Year 2011 the filing
fee for a supplementary application was
$100, but the actual cost of processing
these claims was $184 per application.
Id. Appendix B.
Section 708(b) authorizes the Register
to adjust the fees that the Office charges
for certain services (including the fee for
seeking a supplementary registration),
but before doing so the Register must
conduct a study of the costs incurred by
the Office for registering claims,
recording documents, and providing
other services. In conducting this study,
the Register must consider the timing of
any fee adjustments and the Office’s
authority to use the fees consistent with
its budget. 17 U.S.C. 708(b)(1). Section
708(b) provides that the Register may
adjust these fees no ‘‘more than
necessary to cover the reasonable costs
incurred by the Copyright Office for
. . . [such services], plus a reasonable
inflation adjustment to account for any
estimated increase in costs.’’ 17 U.S.C.
708(b)(2). It also provides that the Office
must submit a proposed fee schedule to
Congress and that the Office may
implement the schedule 120 days
thereafter (unless Congress enacts a law
stating that it does not approve the
schedule). 17 U.S.C. 708(b)(5).
Once the Proposed Rule has been
implemented, the Office will monitor
the cost of processing supplementary
claims to determine if future fee
adjustments may be warranted or if the
Office should charge a different fee for
claims submitted through the electronic
registration system and claims
submitted on Form CA. The Office will
use this information in conducting its
next fee study.
19 This
PO 00000
increase went into effect on May 1, 2014.
Frm 00046
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
86659
2. Fee for Additional Certificate of
Registration
When the Office receives an
application for a supplementary
registration, the registration specialist
will compare the information set forth
in the application with the information
set forth in the basic registration. If the
Office has made a digital copy of the
certificate of registration, the specialist
may be able to conduct his or her review
without obtaining a physical copy of the
certificate.20 If the certificate has not
been digitized, the specialist will ask
the applicant to submit a copy of the
certificate. If the applicant is unable to
do so, the Office will charge an
additional fee to make a copy of the
basic registration in order to conduct the
requisite review.21
C. Examination Practices
The Proposed Rule also updates
examination practices in several areas,
including, among other things, to reflect
changes to the Compendium of
Copyright Office Practices, to update
rules regarding when supplementary
registration will be declined, and to
update practices regarding crossreferences in the Office’s public record.
Changes to Reflect Compendium. The
Compendium is the manual of the
Register of Copyrights setting forth and
explaining key administrative duties of
the Copyright Office under title 17 of
the United States Code. It serves as both
a technical manual for the Office’s staff,
as well as a guidebook for authors,
copyright licensees, practitioners,
scholars, the courts, and members of the
general public. In 2014 the Office
released a comprehensive revision of
the Compendium that makes the
Office’s practices more accessible and
transparent to the public, and sets the
stage for a number of long-term
improvements in registration and
recordation policy. See 79 FR 78911
(Dec. 31, 2014).
The Proposed Rule updates a number
of practices that are reflected in the
Compendium.22 It clarifies that the
Office may issue a supplementary
registration to correct an error in a basic
registration issued on or after January 1,
1978, or a renewal registration for a
work that was registered or first
20 The Office has digitized the certificates of
registration for claims registered between 1994 and
the present. Certificates issued before that year may
be stored in electronic form, on microfilm, in bound
volumes, or in other physical formats.
21 The current fee for obtaining an additional
copy of a certificate of registration is $40 (https://
copyright.gov/docs/fees.html).
22 Corresponding changes will be made to the
Compendium when the Proposed Rule goes into
effect.
E:\FR\FM\01DEP1.SGM
01DEP1
86660
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 231 / Thursday, December 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
published on or before December 31,
1977. See Compendium section 1802.3.
Updating Rules for When
Supplementary Registration Will Be
Denied. The Proposed Rule also clarifies
that the Office may decline to issue a
supplementary registration for a basic
registration that covered the first
twenty-eight years of the copyright term,
because any registration issued before
January 1, 1978 has expired by
now.23 See id. section 1802.4. Allowing
interested parties to correct or amplify
the information in a registration after
the initial term expired creates a
potential for error, mistake, or even
fraud. This could have significant
consequences in a legal dispute, given
that a certificate of registration may
create an evidentiary presumption
concerning the facts stated in the
certificate.24 17 U.S.C. 410(c). Therefore,
the Proposed Rule explains that the
Office may issue a supplementary
registration for a basic registration that
covered the first twenty-eight years of
the copyright term only in exceptional
circumstances, if the proposed
correction or amplification is supported
by clear, convincing, and objective
documentation. In this respect, the
Proposed Rule tracks a similar provision
in the current regulation that specifies
when the Office may issue a
supplementary registration for a basic
renewal registration.25
Cross-references to Basic Registration.
Under the current regulations, when the
Office issues a supplementary
registration, it will cross-reference the
records for the supplementary
registration and the basic registration
only if the application for
supplementary registration was
submitted by or on behalf of the
23 Registrations issued under the 1909 Act
expired at the end of the first twenty-eight years of
the copyright term. If the copyright was renewed,
the renewal registration expired at the end of the
renewal term.
24 For similar reasons, the Proposed Rule clarifies
that the Copyright Office will not issue a
supplementary registration for a registration that
has been cancelled. Cancellation is an
administrative procedure for invalidating a
registration that has been issued by the Office. The
Office has the authority to cancel a registration if
‘‘the material deposited does not constitute
copyrightable subject matter’’ or if ‘‘the claim is
invalid for any other reason.’’ 17 U.S.C. 410(b). It
also has the authority to cancel a registration if the
registration was made in error or if it was issued
in the wrong class or series. See generally 37 CFR
201.7.
25 37 CFR 201.5(b)(2)(iv). In addition, the
Proposed Rule removes a sentence from this
provision which states that the Office may correct
an error in a renewal registration if the Office
received an application for supplementary
registration in the last year of the first twenty-eight
years of the copyright term. This sentence is no
longer needed now that the deadline for submitting
such claims has passed.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:51 Nov 30, 2016
Jkt 241001
copyright claimant named in the basic
registration.26 See 37 CFR 201.5(b)(1)
n.1. If the application was submitted by
or on behalf of any other party, the
records will not be cross-referenced
with each other. See Compendium
section 1802.1.
After further consideration, the Office
has concluded that these crossreferences should be included
regardless of who has submitted the
application for supplementary
registration. This amendment will
improve the accuracy and usefulness of
the public record by making it easier to
find supplementary registrations that
may contain additional information
pertaining to the basic registration
(regardless of who submitted the
application for supplementary
registration). If an interested party
wishes to identify the person who made
the correction or amplification, that
information can be obtained by
reviewing the records for the
supplementary registration.27
Clarifying Relationship Between Basic
and Supplementary Registration. An
additional change is being made to
clarify the nature of a supplementary
registration. As a general rule, the Office
will issue only one registration for each
work—meaning that the Office will
issue one basic registration for a
particular work, but will not issue
additional basic registrations once the
first basic registration has been made.
See Compendium section 510. There are
several exceptions to this rule, which
are set forth in 37 CFR 202.3(b)(11)(i)–
(iv).
One of the exceptions relates to
supplementary registrations, stating that
‘‘[s]upplementary registrations may be
made . . . to correct or amplify the
information in a registration made
under this section.’’ 28 This erroneously
suggests, however, that supplementary
registrations are treated as basic
registrations. The Proposed Rule will
accordingly remove this exception;
because a supplementary registration is
not considered a basic registration, there
is no limit on the number of
26 Specifically, the Office will place a note in the
record for the basic registration that identifies the
registration number and the effective date of
registration for the supplementary registration, and
it will place a corresponding note in the record for
the supplementary registration that identifies the
registration number and the year of registration for
the basic registration. See Compendium section
1802.1.
27 The Proposed Rule retains the requirement that
an application for a supplementary registration
must be submitted by an author of the work, a
claimant of the work, an owner of any of the
exclusive rights in the work, or a duly authorized
agent of any of the foregoing parties. 37 CFR
201.5(b)(1).
28 37 CFR 202.3(b)(11)(iv).
PO 00000
Frm 00047
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
supplementary registrations that may be
issued for a particular basic registration,
and in any event, the Office does not
view supplementary registration as an
exception to the general rule against
issuing one basic registration per work.
Certification that Applicant Has
Reviewed Basic Registration. It has come
to the Office’s attention that applicants
often submit an application for
supplementary registration without
reviewing the information that is set
forth in the basic registration. In some
cases, applicants review the records that
are posted in the Office’s online
database, but those records do not
contain all the information that is set
forth in the certificate of registration for
a particular work. This may create a
discrepancy between the registration
record and the changes proposed in the
application for supplementary
registration. This complicates the
examination of the claim, which, in
turn, delays the issuance of the
supplementary registration.
The Proposed Rule addresses this
issue by requiring applicants to sign a
certification stating that they reviewed
the certificate of registration for the
basic registration before submitting the
application for supplementary
registration.29 If the applicant does not
have a copy of the certificate, he or she
may obtain a copy from the Record
Research and Certification Section by
following the procedure set forth in
section 2408 of the Compendium. If it
appears that the applicant did not
review the basic registration before
seeking a supplementary registration,
the Office may ask the applicant to
resubmit the application or may refuse
registration.
Referral Procedure for Office Error.
Finally, the Proposed Rule clarifies that
if an error in a basic registration was
caused by the Office’s own action, it
will correct that error on its own
initiative through an internal procedure
known as a ‘‘referral.’’ In such cases,
there is no need to seek a
supplementary registration, and there is
no fee for referral. See Compendium
section 1804. It also clarifies that the
referral procedure does not apply if the
error was caused by the applicant’s
action—even if the examiner should
have recognized that error when he or
she examined the claim. In such cases,
the Office will correct the error only if
the applicant submits an application for
29 If the applicant fails to sign the certification in
the online application, the application will not be
accepted by the electronic registration system. If the
applicant fails to sign the certification on Form CA,
the registration specialist will communicate with
the applicant.
E:\FR\FM\01DEP1.SGM
01DEP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 231 / Thursday, December 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
a supplementary registration together
with the appropriate filing fee.
D. Technical Amendments
The Proposed Rule will improve the
readability of the regulation by
reorganizing or revising awkward
provisions, and by adopting the
appropriate format for providing crossreferences within the Code of Federal
Regulations (as recommended by the
Federal Register Document Drafting
Handbook).30 In all cases, these
technical amendments are intended to
clarify the existing regulation, but they
do not represent a substantive change in
policy.
III. Conclusion
The Proposed Rule will increase the
efficiency of the supplementary
registration process and create a more
robust record of the claim. The Office
invites public comment on these
proposed changes.
List of Subjects in 37 CFR Part 201
Copyright, General provisions.
Proposed Regulations
For the reasons set forth in the
preamble, the Copyright Office proposes
amending 37 CFR parts 201 and 202 as
follows:
PART 201—GENERAL PROVISIONS
1. Revise the authority citation for part
201 to read as follows:
■
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 702.
2. Amend § 201.3 by revising
paragraph (c)(9) to read as follows:
■
§ 201.3 Fees for registration, recordation,
and related services, special services, and
services performed by the Licensing
Division.
*
*
*
(c) * * *
*
*
(9) Registration of a correction or amplification to a claim:
(i) Supplementary registration: electronic filing or paper filing .................
(ii) Correction of a design registration
(Form DC) .........................................
*
■
100
*
*
*
*
3. Revise § 201.5 to read as follows:
§ 201.5
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
130
Supplementary registration.
(a) General. This section prescribes
conditions relating to the filing of an
application for supplementary
registration under section 408(d) of title
30 The regulation repeatedly states that title 17 of
the United States Code was ‘‘amended by Pub. L.
94–553.’’ The Office recently issued a notice of
proposed rulemaking that would remove this
phrase. See 81 FR 67940, 67944 (Oct. 3, 2016).
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:51 Nov 30, 2016
Jkt 241001
17 of the United States Code to correct
an error in a copyright registration or to
amplify the information given in a
registration. No correction or
amplification of the information in a
basic registration will be made except
pursuant to the provisions of this
section. As an exception, where it is
discovered that a basic registration
contains an error caused by the
Copyright Office’s own action, the
Office will take appropriate measures to
rectify its mistake.
(b) Definitions. (1) A basic registration
means any of the following:
(i) A copyright registration made
under sections 408, 409, and 410 of title
17 of the United States Code;
(ii) A renewal registration made under
section 304 of title 17 of the United
States Code; or
(iii) A copyright registration or a
renewal registration made under title 17
of the United States Code as it existed
before January 1, 1978.
(2) A supplementary registration
means a registration issued under
section 408(d) of title 17 of the United
States Code and the provisions of this
section.
(c) Persons entitled to file an
application for supplementary
registration. Supplementary registration
can be made only if a basic copyright
registration for the same work has
already been completed. After a basic
registration has been completed, any
author or other copyright claimant of
the work, or the owner of any exclusive
right in the work, or the duly authorized
agent of any such author, other
claimant, or owner, who wishes to
correct or amplify the information given
in the basic registration for the work
may file an application for
supplementary registration.
(d) Basis for issuing a supplementary
registration. (1) Supplementary
registration may be made either to
correct or to amplify the information in
a basic registration.
(2) A correction is appropriate if
information in the basic registration was
incorrect at the time that basic
registration was made.
(3) An amplification is appropriate:
(i) To supplement or clarify the
information that was required by the
application for the basic registration and
should have been provided, such as the
identity of a co-author or co-claimant,
but was omitted at the time the basic
registration was made; or
(ii) To reflect changes in facts, other
than those relating to transfer, license,
or ownership of rights in the work, that
occurred since the basic registration was
made.
PO 00000
Frm 00048
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
86661
(4) Supplementary registration is not
appropriate:
(i) To reflect a change in ownership
that occurred on or after the effective
date of the basic registration or to reflect
the division, allocation, licensing or
transfer of rights in a work;
(ii) To correct errors in statements or
notices on the copies of phonorecords of
a work, or to reflect changes in the
content of a work; or
(iii) To correct or amplify the
information set forth in a basic
registration that has been cancelled
under § 201.7.
(5) If an error or omission in a basic
renewal registration is extremely minor,
and does not involve the identity of the
renewal claimant or the legal basis of
the claim, supplementary registration
may be made at any time. In an
exceptional case, however,
supplementary registration may be
made to correct the name of the renewal
claimant and the legal basis of the claim
if clear, convincing, and objective
documentation is submitted to the
Copyright Office which proves that an
inadvertent error was made in failing to
designate the correct living statutory
renewal claimant in the basic renewal
registration.
(6) In general, the Copyright Office
will not issue a supplementary
registration for a basic registration made
under title 17 of the United States Code
as it existed before January 1, 1978. In
an exceptional case, the Copyright
Office may issue a supplementary
registration for such a registration, if the
correction or amplification is supported
by clear, convincing, and objective
documentation.
(e) Application for supplementary
registration. (1) To seek a
supplementary registration for a work
registered in Class TX, PA, VA, SR, or
SE, an unpublished collection or a unit
of publication registered under
§ 202.3(b)(4)(i) of this chapter, or a
group of related works registered under
§ 202.3(b)(6) through (10) or § 202.4 of
this chapter, an applicant must
complete and submit the online
application designated for
supplementary registration.
(2) To seek a supplementary
registration for a database that consists
predominantly of photographs
registered under § 202.3(b)(5) of this
chapter, an applicant must complete
and submit the online application
designated for supplementary
registration after consultation with and
under the direction of the Visual Arts
Division.
(3) To seek a supplementary
registration for a restored work
registered under § 202.12 of this
E:\FR\FM\01DEP1.SGM
01DEP1
jstallworth on DSK7TPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
86662
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 231 / Thursday, December 1, 2016 / Proposed Rules
chapter, a database that does not consist
predominantly of photographs
registered under § 202.3(b)(5) of this
chapter, or a renewal registration, an
applicant must complete and submit a
paper application using Form CA.
(4) Before submitting the application,
the applicant must sign a certification
stating that the applicant reviewed a
copy of the certificate of registration for
the basic registration that will be
corrected or amplified by the
supplementary registration. To obtain a
copy of the certificate, the applicant
may submit a written request to the
Records Research and Certification
Section using the procedure set forth in
Chapter 2400 of the Compendium of
U.S. Copyright Office Practices, Third
Edition.
(5) The appropriate filing fee, as
required by § 201.3(c), must be included
with the application or charged to an
active deposit account. At the Office’s
discretion, the applicant may be
required to pay an additional fee to
make a copy of the certificate of
registration for the basic registration that
will be corrected or amplified by the
supplementary registration.
(6) Copies, phonorecords, or
supporting documents cannot be made
part of the record for a supplementary
registration and should not be submitted
with the application.
(f) Effect of supplementary
registration. (1) When the Copyright
Office completes a supplementary
registration, it will issue a certificate of
supplementary registration bearing a
new registration number in the
appropriate class. The Office will crossreference the records for the basic
registration and the supplementary
registration by placing a note in each
record that identifies the registration
number and effective date of registration
for the related registration.
(2) As provided in section 408(d) of
title 17 of the United States Code, the
information contained in a
supplementary registration augments
but does not supersede that contained in
the basic registration. The basic
registration will not be expunged or
cancelled.
PART 202—PREREGISTRATION AND
REGISTRATION OF CLAIMS TO
COPYRIGHT
4. The authority citation for part 202
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 408(f), 702.
§ 202.3
Registration of copyright.
5. Amend § 202.3 as follows:
a. In paragraph (b)(11)(iii), remove the
phrase ‘‘by that applicant; and’’ and add
in its place ‘‘by that applicant.’’
■ b. Remove paragraph (b)(11)(iv).
■
■
Dated: November 22, 2016.
Sarang V. Damle,
General Counsel and Associate Register of
Copyrights.
[FR Doc. 2016–28701 Filed 11–30–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410–30–P
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
AGENCY
40 CFR Part 52
[EPA–R09–OAR–2016–0245; FRL–9955–60–
Region 9]
Approval of California Air Plan
Revisions, Yolo-Solano Air Quality
Management District
Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA).
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
The Environmental Protection
Agency (EPA) is proposing to approve a
revision to the Yolo-Solano Air Quality
Management District (YSAQMD)
portion of the California State
Implementation Plan (SIP). This
revision concerns emissions of volatile
organic compounds (VOCs) and
particulate matter (PM) from confined
animal facilities (CAFs). We are
proposing to approve a local rule to
regulate these emission sources under
the Clean Air Act (CAA or the Act). We
are taking comments on this proposal
and plan to follow with a final action.
DATES: Any comments must arrive by
January 3, 2017.
ADDRESSES: Submit your comments,
identified by Docket ID No. EPA–R09–
OAR–2016–0245 at https://
www.regulations.gov, or via email to
Andrew Steckel, Rulemaking Office
Chief at Steckel.Andrew@epa.gov. For
SUMMARY:
comments submitted at Regulations.gov,
follow the online instructions for
submitting comments. Once submitted,
comments cannot be removed or edited
from Regulations.gov. For either manner
of submission, the EPA may publish any
comment received to its public docket.
Do not submit electronically any
information you consider to be
Confidential Business Information (CBI)
or other information whose disclosure is
restricted by statute. Multimedia
submissions (audio, video, etc.) must be
accompanied by a written comment.
The written comment is considered the
official comment and should include
discussion of all points you wish to
make. The EPA will generally not
consider comments or comment
contents located outside of the primary
submission (i.e. on the web, cloud, or
other file sharing system). For
additional submission methods, please
contact the person identified in the FOR
FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT section.
For the full EPA public comment policy,
information about CBI or multimedia
submissions, and general guidance on
making effective comments, please visit
https://www2.epa.gov/dockets/
commenting-epa-dockets.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
Nancy Levin, EPA Region IX, (415) 972–
3848, levin.nancy@epa.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Throughout this document, ‘‘we,’’ ‘‘us’’
and ‘‘our’’ refer to the EPA.
Table of Contents
I. The State’s Submittal
A. What rule did the State submit?
B. Are there other versions of this rule?
C. What is the purpose of the submitted
rule?
II. The EPA’s Evaluation and Action
A. How is the EPA evaluating the rule?
B. Does the rule meet the evaluation
criteria?
C. EPA Recommendations To Further
Improve the Rule
D. Public Comment and Proposed Action
III. Incorporation by Reference
IV. Statutory and Executive Order Reviews
I. The State’s Submittal
A. What rule did the State submit?
Table 1 lists the rule addressed by this
proposal with the dates that it was
adopted by the local air agency and
submitted by the California Air
Resourced Board (CARB).
TABLE 1—SUBMITTED RULE
Local agency
Rule No.
Rule title
Adopted
Submitted
YSAQMD ................................
11.2
Confined Animal Facilities Permit Program ...........................
06/14/06
10/05/2006
VerDate Sep<11>2014
13:51 Nov 30, 2016
Jkt 241001
PO 00000
Frm 00049
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
E:\FR\FM\01DEP1.SGM
01DEP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 231 (Thursday, December 1, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 86656-86662]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-28701]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
LIBRARY OF CONGRESS
Copyright Office
37 CFR Parts 201, 202
[Docket No. 2016-9]
Supplementary Registration
AGENCY: U.S. Copyright Office, Library of Congress.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: The U.S. Copyright Office is proposing to amend the regulation
governing supplementary registration to reflect certain technical
upgrades that will soon be made to the electronic
[[Page 86657]]
registration system. In most cases applicants will be required to
submit an online application in order to correct or amplify the
information set forth in a basic registration. This will increase the
efficiency of the supplementary registration process for both
applicants and the Office alike. In addition, the Office is amending
the regulation to codify and update certain practices that are set
forth in the Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office Practices, Third
Edition and to improve the readability of the regulation.
DATES: Comments on the proposed rule must be made in writing and must
be received in the U.S. Copyright Office no later than January 3, 2017.
ADDRESSES: For reasons of government efficiency, the Copyright Office
is using the regulations.gov system for the submission and posting of
public comments in this proceeding. All comments are therefore to be
submitted electronically through regulations.gov. Specific instructions
for submitting comments are available on the Copyright Office Web site
at https://copyright.gov/rulemaking/supplementary-registration/. If
electronic submission of comments is not feasible due to lack of access
to a computer and/or the Internet, please contact the Office using the
contact information below for special instructions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Robert J. Kasunic, Associate Register
and Director of Registration Policy and Practice, by telephone at (202)
707-8040; or Erik Bertin, Deputy Director of Registration Policy and
Practice, by telephone at 202-707-8040.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
I. Background
Section 408(d) of the Copyright Act authorizes the Register of
Copyrights (the ``Register'') to establish ``formal procedures for the
filing of an application for supplementary registration.'' 17 U.S.C.
408(d). A supplementary registration is a special type of registration
that may be used ``to correct an error in a copyright registration or
to amplify the information given in a registration.'' Id. Specifically,
it identifies an error or omission in an existing registration
(referred to herein as a ``basic registration'') and places the
corrected information or additional information in the public record.
When the U.S. Copyright Office (the ``Office'') issues a
supplementary registration, it does not cancel or replace the basic
registration or the registration number for that registration.
Likewise, the Office does not change the information set forth in the
basic registration or the public record for that registration. Instead,
as specified by statute, the basic registration and the supplementary
registration coexist with each other in the public record, and ``the
information contained in a supplementary registration augments but does
not supersede that contained in the earlier registration.'' Id.
II. The Proposed Rule
A. Application for Supplementary Registration
1. Online Registration
The Office is proposing to amend the regulation that governs the
procedure for seeking a supplementary registration (the ``Proposed
Rule''). Under the Proposed Rule, in most cases, applicants will be
required to file an online application in order to correct or amplify
the information set forth in a basic registration.
The Office has allowed and encouraged applicants to register their
works through the electronic registration system since 2007. See 72 FR
36883 (July 6, 2007). When the Office introduced this system, it could
be used only to seek a basic registration. To seek a supplementary
registration, applicants had to submit a paper application using Form
CA. 37 CFR 201.5(c)(1), (c)(2). In February 2015 the Office completed a
comprehensive analysis of its electronic registration system with input
from technical experts and stakeholders. This analysis will support the
Office's long-term goals of creating both a better interface and a
better public record. See U.S. Copyright Office, Office of the Chief
Information Officer, Report and Recommendations of the Technical
Upgrades Special Project Team (Feb. 2015), available at https://copyright.gov/docs/technical_upgrades/usco-technicalupgrades.pdf; see
also 78 FR 17722 (Mar. 22, 2013). In December 2015 the Register issued
a strategic plan that sets forth the Office's performance objectives
for the next five years. The plan provides a roadmap for re-envisioning
almost all of the services that the Office provides, including how
applicants register claims, submit deposits, record documents, share
data, and access expert resources. With respect to information
technology, the plan calls for ``a robust and flexible technology
enterprise that is dedicated to the current and future needs of a
modern copyright agency.'' U.S. Copyright Office, Strategic Plan 2016-
2020: Positioning the United States Copyright Office for the Future, at
35 (Dec. 1, 2015), available at https://www.copyright.gov/reports/strategic-plan/sp2016-2020.html. At the direction of Congress,\1\ the
Office has also developed a detailed IT plan, and obtained public
comments on specific strategies, costs, and timelines for technology
objectives. U.S. Copyright Office, Provisional Information Technology
Modernization Plan and Cost Analysis (Feb. 29, 2016), available at
https://copyright.gov/reports/itplan/.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ H.R. Rep. No. 114-110, at 16-17 (2015).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the meantime, the Office has made some enhancements to the
current system that will improve the versatility of the supplementary
registration process. Under the Proposed Rule, applicants will be
required to use the online registration system to file a supplementary
registration for any types of works that are capable of being
registered through the electronic system. This online filing
requirement will thus apply to supplementary registrations for literary
works (e.g., fiction, nonfiction, poetry, etc.), single issues of a
serial publication (e.g., periodicals, magazines, newsletters,
journals, etc.), works of the visual arts (e.g., photographs, maps,
technical drawings, etc.), works of the performing arts (e.g., musical
works, dramatic works, choreographic works, pantomimes, motion pictures
and other audiovisual works, etc.), and sound recordings. See 37 CFR
202.3(b). The online filing requirement will also extend to
supplementary registrations for collective works, works registered
under the unit of publication option, and works registered as an
unpublished collection. See 37 CFR 202.3(b)(4). It will also apply to
supplementary registrations for groups of serials,\2\ newspapers, or
newsletters,\3\ groups of published photographs,\4\ or groups of
[[Page 86658]]
updates and revisions to a photographic database.\5\ In the near
future, the online filing requirement will apply to supplementary
registrations for groups of unpublished photographs,\6\ and groups of
contributions to periodicals.\7\ If the Office subsequently decides to
move registrations for other classes of works into the electronic
system, supplementary registrations for those works will also be
subject to this same requirement. In short, use of the online
supplementary registration application will be required for most works.
Moreover, applicants will generally be required to use the online
registration system to file a supplementary registration even if the
work was originally registered using a paper application.\8\
Instructions for completing the online application will be provided in
the electronic system and in Chapter 1800 of the Compendium of U.S.
Copyright Office Practices, Third Edition (hereinafter
``Compendium'').\9\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ See 37 CFR 202.3(b)(6)(v).
\3\ Although the current regulations state that an application
for a group of newspaper or newsletter issues must be submitted with
a paper application, the Office is able to process these types of
claims through the electronic registration system, and has in fact
been doing so since December 14, 2012. See 37 CFR 202.3(b)(7)(i)(B),
(9)(viii). The Office intends to amend the regulations in a future
rulemaking to reflect these recent upgrades.
\4\ In 2012 the Office issued an interim regulation that
established a pilot program for applicants that register large
numbers of photographs using the group option for published
photographs (referred to herein as ``GRPPH'') and the group option
for photographic databases. 76 FR 4072, 4074, 4075 (Jan. 24, 2011).
Applicants that participate in the pilot program may submit their
photographs through the electronic system, provided that they obtain
prior authorization from the Visual Arts Division and follow the
instructions from that Division concerning the information that
should be included in the application. 37 CFR 202.3(b)(10)(xi).
While the pilot program was well-intentioned, it has been extremely
burdensome for both applicants and the Office. Therefore, the Office
is issuing a separate notice of proposed rulemaking (published
elsewhere in this volume of the Federal Register, and referred to
herein as the ``Photo Rulemaking'') that will modify the regulation
that governs GRPPH. Among other changes, the rule proposed in the
Photo Rulemaking will require applicants to submit an online
application specifically designed for GRPPH claims, instead of
submitting their photographs through the pilot program. (By
contrast, the pilot program for photographic databases will remain
in effect--at least for the time being.)
\5\ Applicants may register a photographic database through the
electronic system by participating in the pilot program mentioned in
footnote 4. 76 FR at 4074, 4075; 37 CFR 202.3(b)(5)(ii)(A).
\6\ The rule proposed in the Photo Rulemaking will establish a
new group registration option for unpublished photographs (referred
to herein as ``GRUPH''). In order to use this option, applicants
will be required to submit an online application specifically
designed for GRUPH claims, instead of submitting a paper
application.
\7\ The Office is issuing a separate notice of proposed
rulemaking (published elsewhere in this volume of the Federal
Register, and referred to herein as the ``GRCP Rulemaking'') on a
proposed rule that will modify the group option for contributions to
periodicals (``GRCP''). Among other changes, the rule proposed in
the GRCP Rulemaking will require applicants to submit an online
application specifically designed for GRCP claims, instead of
submitting a paper application.
\8\ As discussed above in footnote 4, the rule proposed in the
Photo Rulemaking will modify the requirements for registering a
group of published photographs. Among other things, applicants will
be allowed to submit no more than 750 photographs with each
application. The limit on the number of photographs, in turn, will
affect the procedure for correcting or amplifying an existing
registration for a group of published photographs. If the basic
registration covers 750 photographs or less, the applicant will be
able to correct or amplify the registration record with a single
supplementary registration. By contrast, multiple supplementary
registrations may be needed in cases where the basic registration
had been issued before the issuance of a final rule in the Photo
Rulemaking and where the basic registration covers more than 750
photographs.
\9\ Under the Proposed Rule, applicants will be required to
obtain prior authorization and instructions from the Visual Arts
Division if they intend to correct or amplify the information set
forth in a basic registration for a photographic database. This is
due to the fact that a supplementary registration for a photographic
database will be processed under the pilot program mentioned in
footnote 4. The Visual Arts Division will continue to monitor claims
submitted under this program to ensure that applicants complete the
online application in an appropriate manner.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Once the Proposed Rule goes into effect, applicants will not be
allowed to submit a paper application on Form CA to correct or amplify
the basic registration for any types of works that are capable of being
registered through the electronic system. If the Office receives such a
paper application, it will ask the applicant to resubmit the claim
using the online application.
To correct or amplify the registration record for works that cannot
be registered through the electronic system, applicants will be
required to submit a paper application using Form CA.\10\ This includes
group registrations issued under 37 CFR 202.3(b)(5) for a database that
does not consist predominantly of photographs,\11\ and GATT
registrations issued under 37 CFR 202.12 for a foreign work restored to
copyright protection under the Uruguay Round Agreements Act.\12\ It
also includes a renewal registration for a work registered or first
published before January 1, 1978.\13\ While instructions for completing
Form CA are provided with Form CA and in section 1802.8 of the
Compendium, the specific requirements for the paper application will no
longer be listed in the regulation itself.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\10\ A supplementary registration cannot be used to correct or
amplify the registration record for a vessel design or a mask work.
The Office has no authority and no procedure for correcting
substantive errors in these types of registrations. See 17 U.S.C.
1319; see also 71 FR 46402 (Aug. 14, 2006). However, if the
applicant made a clerical or typographical error in an application
for a vessel design, the owner of the registered design or its duly
authorized agent may be able to correct the error by submitting an
application for a certificate of correction using Form DC. See 37
CFR 212.8(a)(3), (c)(2).
\11\ Currently, applicants must submit these types of claims
using a paper application ``that best reflects the subject matter of
the material in the database.'' 37 CFR 202.3(b)(5)(ii)(A).
\12\ Currently, applicants must submit these types of claims
using a paper application submitted on Form GATT. 37 CFR
202.12(c)(2).
\13\ Currently, applicants must submit these types of claims
using a paper application submitted on Form RE. 37 CFR 202.17(g)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. Policy Considerations Supporting Online-Only Registration
A substantial majority of the U.S. population has access to the
internet,\14\ and the Office expects that most copyright owners will be
able to use the electronic registration system.\15\ However, the Office
recognizes that millions of Americans do not have broadband service,
and that the Proposed Rule may impose a burden on copyright owners who
fall within this segment of the population.\16\ Nevertheless, the
Office believes that the benefits of phasing-out the paper application
and replacing it with an online application outweigh the potential
burden on copyright owners who do not have direct access to the
internet.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\14\ The Pew Research Center found that 84% of adults use the
internet, including 85% of the people in urban and suburban
communities and 78% of the people in rural communities. Pew Research
Center, Americans' Internet Access: 2000-2015 (June 26, 2015),
available at https://www.pewinternet.org/2015/06/26/americans-internet-access-2000-2015/c.
\15\ Approximately 94% of the claims filed in fiscal year 2015
were submitted through the electronic system, while 6% of the claims
were submitted with a paper application.
\16\ The Federal Communications Commission (``FCC'') reported
that 17% of the population does not have access to a broadband
service with connection speeds of twenty-five megabits per second
(``mbps'') for downloads and three mbps for uploads. This figure
includes 8% of the people who live in urban areas, 53% of the people
in rural areas, and 63% of the people in U.S. territories and Tribal
lands. Federal Communications Commission, 2015 Broadband Progress
Report at 4 (Jan. 29, 2015), available at https://www.fcc.gov/reports/2015-broadband-progress-report.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Paper applications are extremely burdensome for both applicants and
the Office. Describing an error or omission in a basic registration can
be tedious and time consuming, especially when the applicant needs to
make a significant number of changes to the registration record. The
Office routinely receives applications that are hundreds of pages long,
such as when a stock photography company wants to add thousands of
titles to the record for a photographic database. Examining these
applications imposes tremendous burdens on the Office, because each
correction or amplification must be copied from Form CA and entered
into the record by hand. In some cases, registration specialists have
spent several days on a single application. This increasing demand on
the Office's limited resources causes delays in issuing supplementary
registrations, and it prevents specialists from examining other types
of claims thereby increasing the overall backlog within the Office.
If a copyright owner does not have broadband at home, at the home
of a relative, friend, or neighbor, or at his place of employment,
there are other options for submitting an application for supplementary
registration. If the copyright owner has a tablet or laptop, he could
complete and submit the online application at a coffee shop, a
[[Page 86659]]
bookstore, or any other place where wi-fi or cellular service is
available.\17\ He also could log onto the electronic registration
system by going to a public library that provides computers with
internet access.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\17\ When filing an application for a supplementary registration
there is no need to upload a copy of the work that is covered by the
basic registration. Thus, applicants will be able to submit these
types of claims with a tablet or other wi-fi enabled device. In some
cases, the registration specialist may need to compare the
information provided in the application for supplementary
registration with the copy of the work that was submitted with the
application for the basic registration. For instance, this may be
necessary if the supplementary registration changes the publication
status of the work or adds additional authors to the registration
record. If the Office does not have a copy of the work in its
possession, the registration specialist may ask the applicant to
submit a replacement copy. See Compendium section 1802.9(C). But in
all cases, the replacement copy could be sent by first class mail,
courier, or hand delivery; the copy does not need to be uploaded to
the electronic system (though this would be an option if the
applicant has broadband service).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
In the alternative, the copyright owner could hire an attorney to
submit the application on his behalf, either by paying for the
attorney's services or by obtaining pro bono representation.\18\ The
Office also notes that a number of companies will prepare and submit an
application for a fee. These companies typically provide this service
for copyright owners seeking a basic registration, but they could
conceivably expand their offering to include supplementary
registrations.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\18\ The Office does not require applications to be prepared or
submitted by an attorney. In certain special cases the Office may
suggest that the copyright owner consider seeking legal advice, but
the Office does not furnish the names of copyright attorneys,
publishers, agents, or other similar information. See 37 CFR
201.2(a)(2).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
For the foregoing reasons, the Office believes that requiring
applicants to use the online application is a reasonable trade-off for
improving the overall efficiency of the supplementary registration
process. The Office invites comment on this proposal, including whether
the Office should eliminate the paper application for seeking a
supplementary registration, phase out this option after a specified
period of time, or continue to offer this option for applicants who
prefer to use the paper-based system.
B. Fees
Under the Proposed Rule, the applicant will be required to pay the
same filing fee, regardless of whether the application is submitted
through the electronic registration system or on Form CA. In addition,
the applicant may be required to pay a fee to locate and obtain a copy
of the basic registration that is referenced in the application. Each
of these fees is discussed below.
1. Filing Fee
In 2012 the Office conducted a study pursuant to section 708 of the
Copyright Act, which authorizes the Register to establish, adjust, and
recover fees for certain services that the Office provides to the
public. After reviewing its costs, the Office decided to increase the
filing fee for a supplementary registration from $100 to $130.\19\ The
Office explained that paper applications ``are considerably less
efficient than electronic registration'' and that the prior fee did not
offset a sufficient percentage of the costs associated with these types
of claims. U.S. Copyright Office, Proposed Schedule and Analysis of
Copyright Fees To Go Into Effect On Or About April 1, 2014, at 18 (Nov.
14, 2013), available at https://www.copyright.gov/docs/newfees/USCOFeeStudy-Nov13.pdf. For example, in Fiscal Year 2011 the filing fee
for a supplementary application was $100, but the actual cost of
processing these claims was $184 per application. Id. Appendix B.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\19\ This increase went into effect on May 1, 2014.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Section 708(b) authorizes the Register to adjust the fees that the
Office charges for certain services (including the fee for seeking a
supplementary registration), but before doing so the Register must
conduct a study of the costs incurred by the Office for registering
claims, recording documents, and providing other services. In
conducting this study, the Register must consider the timing of any fee
adjustments and the Office's authority to use the fees consistent with
its budget. 17 U.S.C. 708(b)(1). Section 708(b) provides that the
Register may adjust these fees no ``more than necessary to cover the
reasonable costs incurred by the Copyright Office for . . . [such
services], plus a reasonable inflation adjustment to account for any
estimated increase in costs.'' 17 U.S.C. 708(b)(2). It also provides
that the Office must submit a proposed fee schedule to Congress and
that the Office may implement the schedule 120 days thereafter (unless
Congress enacts a law stating that it does not approve the schedule).
17 U.S.C. 708(b)(5).
Once the Proposed Rule has been implemented, the Office will
monitor the cost of processing supplementary claims to determine if
future fee adjustments may be warranted or if the Office should charge
a different fee for claims submitted through the electronic
registration system and claims submitted on Form CA. The Office will
use this information in conducting its next fee study.
2. Fee for Additional Certificate of Registration
When the Office receives an application for a supplementary
registration, the registration specialist will compare the information
set forth in the application with the information set forth in the
basic registration. If the Office has made a digital copy of the
certificate of registration, the specialist may be able to conduct his
or her review without obtaining a physical copy of the certificate.\20\
If the certificate has not been digitized, the specialist will ask the
applicant to submit a copy of the certificate. If the applicant is
unable to do so, the Office will charge an additional fee to make a
copy of the basic registration in order to conduct the requisite
review.\21\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\20\ The Office has digitized the certificates of registration
for claims registered between 1994 and the present. Certificates
issued before that year may be stored in electronic form, on
microfilm, in bound volumes, or in other physical formats.
\21\ The current fee for obtaining an additional copy of a
certificate of registration is $40 (https://copyright.gov/docs/fees.html).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
C. Examination Practices
The Proposed Rule also updates examination practices in several
areas, including, among other things, to reflect changes to the
Compendium of Copyright Office Practices, to update rules regarding
when supplementary registration will be declined, and to update
practices regarding cross-references in the Office's public record.
Changes to Reflect Compendium. The Compendium is the manual of the
Register of Copyrights setting forth and explaining key administrative
duties of the Copyright Office under title 17 of the United States
Code. It serves as both a technical manual for the Office's staff, as
well as a guidebook for authors, copyright licensees, practitioners,
scholars, the courts, and members of the general public. In 2014 the
Office released a comprehensive revision of the Compendium that makes
the Office's practices more accessible and transparent to the public,
and sets the stage for a number of long-term improvements in
registration and recordation policy. See 79 FR 78911 (Dec. 31, 2014).
The Proposed Rule updates a number of practices that are reflected
in the Compendium.\22\ It clarifies that the Office may issue a
supplementary registration to correct an error in a basic registration
issued on or after January 1, 1978, or a renewal registration for a
work that was registered or first
[[Page 86660]]
published on or before December 31, 1977. See Compendium section
1802.3.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\22\ Corresponding changes will be made to the Compendium when
the Proposed Rule goes into effect.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Updating Rules for When Supplementary Registration Will Be Denied.
The Proposed Rule also clarifies that the Office may decline to issue a
supplementary registration for a basic registration that covered the
first twenty-eight years of the copyright term, because any
registration issued before January 1, 1978 has expired by now.\23\ See
id. section 1802.4. Allowing interested parties to correct or amplify
the information in a registration after the initial term expired
creates a potential for error, mistake, or even fraud. This could have
significant consequences in a legal dispute, given that a certificate
of registration may create an evidentiary presumption concerning the
facts stated in the certificate.\24\ 17 U.S.C. 410(c). Therefore, the
Proposed Rule explains that the Office may issue a supplementary
registration for a basic registration that covered the first twenty-
eight years of the copyright term only in exceptional circumstances, if
the proposed correction or amplification is supported by clear,
convincing, and objective documentation. In this respect, the Proposed
Rule tracks a similar provision in the current regulation that
specifies when the Office may issue a supplementary registration for a
basic renewal registration.\25\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\23\ Registrations issued under the 1909 Act expired at the end
of the first twenty-eight years of the copyright term. If the
copyright was renewed, the renewal registration expired at the end
of the renewal term.
\24\ For similar reasons, the Proposed Rule clarifies that the
Copyright Office will not issue a supplementary registration for a
registration that has been cancelled. Cancellation is an
administrative procedure for invalidating a registration that has
been issued by the Office. The Office has the authority to cancel a
registration if ``the material deposited does not constitute
copyrightable subject matter'' or if ``the claim is invalid for any
other reason.'' 17 U.S.C. 410(b). It also has the authority to
cancel a registration if the registration was made in error or if it
was issued in the wrong class or series. See generally 37 CFR 201.7.
\25\ 37 CFR 201.5(b)(2)(iv). In addition, the Proposed Rule
removes a sentence from this provision which states that the Office
may correct an error in a renewal registration if the Office
received an application for supplementary registration in the last
year of the first twenty-eight years of the copyright term. This
sentence is no longer needed now that the deadline for submitting
such claims has passed.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Cross-references to Basic Registration. Under the current
regulations, when the Office issues a supplementary registration, it
will cross-reference the records for the supplementary registration and
the basic registration only if the application for supplementary
registration was submitted by or on behalf of the copyright claimant
named in the basic registration.\26\ See 37 CFR 201.5(b)(1) n.1. If the
application was submitted by or on behalf of any other party, the
records will not be cross-referenced with each other. See Compendium
section 1802.1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\26\ Specifically, the Office will place a note in the record
for the basic registration that identifies the registration number
and the effective date of registration for the supplementary
registration, and it will place a corresponding note in the record
for the supplementary registration that identifies the registration
number and the year of registration for the basic registration. See
Compendium section 1802.1.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
After further consideration, the Office has concluded that these
cross-references should be included regardless of who has submitted the
application for supplementary registration. This amendment will improve
the accuracy and usefulness of the public record by making it easier to
find supplementary registrations that may contain additional
information pertaining to the basic registration (regardless of who
submitted the application for supplementary registration). If an
interested party wishes to identify the person who made the correction
or amplification, that information can be obtained by reviewing the
records for the supplementary registration.\27\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\27\ The Proposed Rule retains the requirement that an
application for a supplementary registration must be submitted by an
author of the work, a claimant of the work, an owner of any of the
exclusive rights in the work, or a duly authorized agent of any of
the foregoing parties. 37 CFR 201.5(b)(1).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Clarifying Relationship Between Basic and Supplementary
Registration. An additional change is being made to clarify the nature
of a supplementary registration. As a general rule, the Office will
issue only one registration for each work--meaning that the Office will
issue one basic registration for a particular work, but will not issue
additional basic registrations once the first basic registration has
been made. See Compendium section 510. There are several exceptions to
this rule, which are set forth in 37 CFR 202.3(b)(11)(i)-(iv).
One of the exceptions relates to supplementary registrations,
stating that ``[s]upplementary registrations may be made . . . to
correct or amplify the information in a registration made under this
section.'' \28\ This erroneously suggests, however, that supplementary
registrations are treated as basic registrations. The Proposed Rule
will accordingly remove this exception; because a supplementary
registration is not considered a basic registration, there is no limit
on the number of supplementary registrations that may be issued for a
particular basic registration, and in any event, the Office does not
view supplementary registration as an exception to the general rule
against issuing one basic registration per work.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\28\ 37 CFR 202.3(b)(11)(iv).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Certification that Applicant Has Reviewed Basic Registration. It
has come to the Office's attention that applicants often submit an
application for supplementary registration without reviewing the
information that is set forth in the basic registration. In some cases,
applicants review the records that are posted in the Office's online
database, but those records do not contain all the information that is
set forth in the certificate of registration for a particular work.
This may create a discrepancy between the registration record and the
changes proposed in the application for supplementary registration.
This complicates the examination of the claim, which, in turn, delays
the issuance of the supplementary registration.
The Proposed Rule addresses this issue by requiring applicants to
sign a certification stating that they reviewed the certificate of
registration for the basic registration before submitting the
application for supplementary registration.\29\ If the applicant does
not have a copy of the certificate, he or she may obtain a copy from
the Record Research and Certification Section by following the
procedure set forth in section 2408 of the Compendium. If it appears
that the applicant did not review the basic registration before seeking
a supplementary registration, the Office may ask the applicant to
resubmit the application or may refuse registration.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\29\ If the applicant fails to sign the certification in the
online application, the application will not be accepted by the
electronic registration system. If the applicant fails to sign the
certification on Form CA, the registration specialist will
communicate with the applicant.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Referral Procedure for Office Error. Finally, the Proposed Rule
clarifies that if an error in a basic registration was caused by the
Office's own action, it will correct that error on its own initiative
through an internal procedure known as a ``referral.'' In such cases,
there is no need to seek a supplementary registration, and there is no
fee for referral. See Compendium section 1804. It also clarifies that
the referral procedure does not apply if the error was caused by the
applicant's action--even if the examiner should have recognized that
error when he or she examined the claim. In such cases, the Office will
correct the error only if the applicant submits an application for
[[Page 86661]]
a supplementary registration together with the appropriate filing fee.
D. Technical Amendments
The Proposed Rule will improve the readability of the regulation by
reorganizing or revising awkward provisions, and by adopting the
appropriate format for providing cross-references within the Code of
Federal Regulations (as recommended by the Federal Register Document
Drafting Handbook).\30\ In all cases, these technical amendments are
intended to clarify the existing regulation, but they do not represent
a substantive change in policy.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\30\ The regulation repeatedly states that title 17 of the
United States Code was ``amended by Pub. L. 94-553.'' The Office
recently issued a notice of proposed rulemaking that would remove
this phrase. See 81 FR 67940, 67944 (Oct. 3, 2016).
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
III. Conclusion
The Proposed Rule will increase the efficiency of the supplementary
registration process and create a more robust record of the claim. The
Office invites public comment on these proposed changes.
List of Subjects in 37 CFR Part 201
Copyright, General provisions.
Proposed Regulations
For the reasons set forth in the preamble, the Copyright Office
proposes amending 37 CFR parts 201 and 202 as follows:
PART 201--GENERAL PROVISIONS
0
1. Revise the authority citation for part 201 to read as follows:
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 702.
0
2. Amend Sec. 201.3 by revising paragraph (c)(9) to read as follows:
Sec. 201.3 Fees for registration, recordation, and related services,
special services, and services performed by the Licensing Division.
* * * * *
(c) * * *
------------------------------------------------------------------------
------------------------------------------------------------------------
(9) Registration of a correction or amplification to a claim:
(i) Supplementary registration: electronic filing or paper filing 130
(ii) Correction of a design registration (Form DC)............... 100
------------------------------------------------------------------------
* * * * *
0
3. Revise Sec. 201.5 to read as follows:
Sec. 201.5 Supplementary registration.
(a) General. This section prescribes conditions relating to the
filing of an application for supplementary registration under section
408(d) of title 17 of the United States Code to correct an error in a
copyright registration or to amplify the information given in a
registration. No correction or amplification of the information in a
basic registration will be made except pursuant to the provisions of
this section. As an exception, where it is discovered that a basic
registration contains an error caused by the Copyright Office's own
action, the Office will take appropriate measures to rectify its
mistake.
(b) Definitions. (1) A basic registration means any of the
following:
(i) A copyright registration made under sections 408, 409, and 410
of title 17 of the United States Code;
(ii) A renewal registration made under section 304 of title 17 of
the United States Code; or
(iii) A copyright registration or a renewal registration made under
title 17 of the United States Code as it existed before January 1,
1978.
(2) A supplementary registration means a registration issued under
section 408(d) of title 17 of the United States Code and the provisions
of this section.
(c) Persons entitled to file an application for supplementary
registration. Supplementary registration can be made only if a basic
copyright registration for the same work has already been completed.
After a basic registration has been completed, any author or other
copyright claimant of the work, or the owner of any exclusive right in
the work, or the duly authorized agent of any such author, other
claimant, or owner, who wishes to correct or amplify the information
given in the basic registration for the work may file an application
for supplementary registration.
(d) Basis for issuing a supplementary registration. (1)
Supplementary registration may be made either to correct or to amplify
the information in a basic registration.
(2) A correction is appropriate if information in the basic
registration was incorrect at the time that basic registration was
made.
(3) An amplification is appropriate:
(i) To supplement or clarify the information that was required by
the application for the basic registration and should have been
provided, such as the identity of a co-author or co-claimant, but was
omitted at the time the basic registration was made; or
(ii) To reflect changes in facts, other than those relating to
transfer, license, or ownership of rights in the work, that occurred
since the basic registration was made.
(4) Supplementary registration is not appropriate:
(i) To reflect a change in ownership that occurred on or after the
effective date of the basic registration or to reflect the division,
allocation, licensing or transfer of rights in a work;
(ii) To correct errors in statements or notices on the copies of
phonorecords of a work, or to reflect changes in the content of a work;
or
(iii) To correct or amplify the information set forth in a basic
registration that has been cancelled under Sec. 201.7.
(5) If an error or omission in a basic renewal registration is
extremely minor, and does not involve the identity of the renewal
claimant or the legal basis of the claim, supplementary registration
may be made at any time. In an exceptional case, however, supplementary
registration may be made to correct the name of the renewal claimant
and the legal basis of the claim if clear, convincing, and objective
documentation is submitted to the Copyright Office which proves that an
inadvertent error was made in failing to designate the correct living
statutory renewal claimant in the basic renewal registration.
(6) In general, the Copyright Office will not issue a supplementary
registration for a basic registration made under title 17 of the United
States Code as it existed before January 1, 1978. In an exceptional
case, the Copyright Office may issue a supplementary registration for
such a registration, if the correction or amplification is supported by
clear, convincing, and objective documentation.
(e) Application for supplementary registration. (1) To seek a
supplementary registration for a work registered in Class TX, PA, VA,
SR, or SE, an unpublished collection or a unit of publication
registered under Sec. 202.3(b)(4)(i) of this chapter, or a group of
related works registered under Sec. 202.3(b)(6) through (10) or Sec.
202.4 of this chapter, an applicant must complete and submit the online
application designated for supplementary registration.
(2) To seek a supplementary registration for a database that
consists predominantly of photographs registered under Sec.
202.3(b)(5) of this chapter, an applicant must complete and submit the
online application designated for supplementary registration after
consultation with and under the direction of the Visual Arts Division.
(3) To seek a supplementary registration for a restored work
registered under Sec. 202.12 of this
[[Page 86662]]
chapter, a database that does not consist predominantly of photographs
registered under Sec. 202.3(b)(5) of this chapter, or a renewal
registration, an applicant must complete and submit a paper application
using Form CA.
(4) Before submitting the application, the applicant must sign a
certification stating that the applicant reviewed a copy of the
certificate of registration for the basic registration that will be
corrected or amplified by the supplementary registration. To obtain a
copy of the certificate, the applicant may submit a written request to
the Records Research and Certification Section using the procedure set
forth in Chapter 2400 of the Compendium of U.S. Copyright Office
Practices, Third Edition.
(5) The appropriate filing fee, as required by Sec. 201.3(c), must
be included with the application or charged to an active deposit
account. At the Office's discretion, the applicant may be required to
pay an additional fee to make a copy of the certificate of registration
for the basic registration that will be corrected or amplified by the
supplementary registration.
(6) Copies, phonorecords, or supporting documents cannot be made
part of the record for a supplementary registration and should not be
submitted with the application.
(f) Effect of supplementary registration. (1) When the Copyright
Office completes a supplementary registration, it will issue a
certificate of supplementary registration bearing a new registration
number in the appropriate class. The Office will cross-reference the
records for the basic registration and the supplementary registration
by placing a note in each record that identifies the registration
number and effective date of registration for the related registration.
(2) As provided in section 408(d) of title 17 of the United States
Code, the information contained in a supplementary registration
augments but does not supersede that contained in the basic
registration. The basic registration will not be expunged or cancelled.
PART 202--PREREGISTRATION AND REGISTRATION OF CLAIMS TO COPYRIGHT
0
4. The authority citation for part 202 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 17 U.S.C. 408(f), 702.
Sec. 202.3 Registration of copyright.
0
5. Amend Sec. 202.3 as follows:
0
a. In paragraph (b)(11)(iii), remove the phrase ``by that applicant;
and'' and add in its place ``by that applicant.''
0
b. Remove paragraph (b)(11)(iv).
Dated: November 22, 2016.
Sarang V. Damle,
General Counsel and Associate Register of Copyrights.
[FR Doc. 2016-28701 Filed 11-30-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 1410-30-P