Concurrence With OIE Risk Designations for Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy, 52811-52812 [2016-18985]
Download as PDF
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 10, 2016 / Notices
These conditions will be listed in the
Fruits and Vegetables Import
Requirements database (available at
https://www.aphis.usda.gov/favir/). In
addition to these specific measures,
pomegranates from Peru will be subject
to the general requirements listed in
§ 319.56–3 that are applicable to the
importation of all fruits and vegetables.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701–7772, and
7781–7786; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 7 CFR
2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
Done in Washington, DC, this 4th day of
August, 2016.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–18987 Filed 8–9–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
[Docket No. APHIS–2015–0055]
Concurrence With OIE Risk
Designations for Bovine Spongiform
Encephalopathy
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
We are advising the public of
our decision to concur with the World
Organization for Animal Health’s (OIE)
bovine spongiform encephalopathy
(BSE) risk designations for 14 regions.
The OIE recognizes these regions as
being of negligible risk for BSE. We are
taking this action based on our review
of information supporting the OIE’s risk
designations for these regions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr.
Roberta Morales, Senior Staff
Veterinarian, Regionalization Evaluation
Services, National Import Export
Services, VS, APHIS, 920 Main Campus
Drive, Suite 200, Raleigh, NC 27606;
(919) 855–7735.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The
regulations in 9 CFR part 92 subpart B,
‘‘Importation of Animals and Animal
Products; Procedures for Requesting
BSE Risk Status Classification With
Regard to Bovines’’ (referred to below as
the regulations), set forth the process by
which the Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service (APHIS) classifies
regions for bovine spongiform
encephalopathy (BSE) risk. Section 92.5
of the regulations provides that all
countries of the world are considered by
APHIS to be in one of three BSE risk
categories: Negligible risk, controlled
risk, or undetermined risk. These risk
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 Aug 09, 2016
Jkt 238001
categories are defined in § 92.1. Any
region that is not classified by APHIS as
presenting either negligible risk or
controlled risk for BSE is considered to
present an undetermined risk. The list
of those regions classified by APHIS as
having either negligible risk or
controlled risk can be accessed on the
APHIS Web site at https://
www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/
animalhealth/animal-and-animalproduct-import-information/ct_animal_
disease_status. The list can also be
obtained by writing to APHIS at
National Import Export Services, 4700
River Road Unit 38, Riverdale, MD
20737.
Under the regulations, APHIS may
classify a region for BSE in one of two
ways. One way is for countries that have
not received a risk classification from
the World Organization for Animal
Health (OIE) to request classification by
APHIS. The other way is for APHIS to
concur with the classification given to a
country by the OIE.
If the OIE has recognized a country as
either BSE negligible risk or BSE
controlled risk, APHIS will seek
information to support our concurrence
with the OIE classification. This
information may be publicly available
information, or APHIS may request that
countries supply the same information
given to the OIE. APHIS will announce
in the Federal Register, subject to
public comment, its intent to concur
with an OIE classification.
In accordance with that process, we
published a notice 1 in the Federal
Register on December 4, 2015 (80 FR
75849, Docket No. APHIS–2015–0055),
in which we announced our intent to
concur with the OIE risk designations
for 16 regions. The OIE recognizes these
regions as being of negligible risk for
BSE. We solicited comments on the
notice for 60 days ending on February
2, 2016. We received two comments by
that date, from a private citizen and a
representative of a foreign government.
One commenter stated that if a
product is being imported only for use
in pet food, then the BSE risk status of
the exporting region should not be an
issue.
We disagree that bovine products
imported for use in pet food do not pose
a risk for introducing or spreading BSE
in the United States. It is possible that
pet foods could be used for cattle feed,
either by accidental misfeeding of pet
foods to cattle or by misusing salvage
pet food for cattle. Farms that raise
multiple species (e.g. dogs, swine, and
1 To view the notice and the comments we
received, go to https://www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2015-0055.
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
52811
cattle) present a particular risk for
misfeeding.
The other commenter stated that the
United States does not recognize all the
OIE’s risk designations for BSE, noting
that the United States still considers
several countries as controlled risk
regions though the OIE has classified
them as negligible risk.
As we explained above, § 92.5 of the
regulations provides two ways that
APHIS may classify a region for BSE.
One way is for countries that have not
received a risk classification from the
OIE to request classification by APHIS.
The other way is for APHIS to concur
with the classification given to a
country by the OIE. If the OIE has
recognized a country as either BSE
negligible risk or BSE controlled risk,
APHIS will seek information to support
our concurrence with the OIE
classification. This information may be
publicly available information, or
APHIS may request that countries
supply the same information given to
the OIE.
The length of APHIS’s review of
information in support of concurrence
depends on a number of factors,
including whether the information is
publicly available, and, if it is not
publicly available, how quickly a
country responds to our request for
information. This notice updates
APHIS’ list of regions recognized as
negligible risk for BSE to include all the
regions for which we have been able to
review information. We intend to
announce concurrence with additional
countries recognized by the OIE in a
future notice.
One commenter noted that while the
OIE guidelines call for removal of
specified risk materials (SRMs) from
animals older than 30 months of age,
our regulations require the removal of
SRMs from animals 30 months of age or
older. The commenter stated that while
this is not a significant difference from
an epidemiological perspective, it
creates a major problem for certification
through the veterinary services of
exporting countries and presents a
barrier to trade.
APHIS notes that the wording ‘‘30
months of age or older’’ is consistent
with Food Safety and Inspection Service
(FSIS) and U.S. Food and Drug
Administration (FDA) regulations as
well as with Canadian regulations. We
also note that anyone wishing to import
bovine products into the United States
must also meet FSIS or FDA
requirements as well as APHIS
requirements. We do not anticipate that
this difference will have a significant
impact on trade.
E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM
10AUN1
52812
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 154 / Wednesday, August 10, 2016 / Notices
In the December 2015 notice, we
mistakenly announced our intent to
recognize Romania as a region of
negligible risk for BSE. In December
2014, the OIE suspended Romania’s
status as a negligible risk region because
Romania reported a case of atypical
BSE. Since then, the OIE has announced
its intent to reinstate Romania’s status
as a region of negligible risk for BSE. We
will be seeking information to verify
Romania’s status and will announce our
intent to concur with the OIE’s
designation in a future notice.
Also in the December 2015 notice, we
announced our intent to recognize
France as a region of negligible risk for
BSE in concurrence with the OIE. Since
then, France has confirmed a case of
classical BSE in a 5-year-old cow.
Accordingly, the OIE has suspended
France’s status as a region of negligible
risk for BSE and reinstated its status as
a region of controlled risk effective
March 25, 2016. For this reason we have
removed France from the list of regions
of negligible risk for BSE in this
document. We will continue to
recognize France as a region of
controlled risk for BSE.
Therefore, in accordance with the
regulations in § 92.5, we are announcing
our decision to concur with the OIE risk
classifications of the following
countries:
• Regions of negligible risk for BSE:
Bulgaria, Cyprus, Czech Republic,
Estonia, Hungary, India, Korea
(Republic of), Latvia, Liechtenstein,
Luxembourg, Malta, Portugal, Slovakia,
and Switzerland.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1622 and 8301–8317;
21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 31 U.S.C. 9701; 7
CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.4.
Done in Washington, DC, this 4th day of
August, 2016.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–18985 Filed 8–9–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
mstockstill on DSK3G9T082PROD with NOTICES
[Docket No. APHIS–2016–0011]
Notice of Decision To Authorize the
Importation of Fresh Figs From Peru
Into the Continental United States
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
AGENCY:
We are advising the public of
our decision to authorize the
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
17:34 Aug 09, 2016
Jkt 238001
importation of fresh figs (Ficus carica)
from Peru into the continental United
States. Based on the findings of a pest
risk analysis, which we made available
for the public to review and comment
through a previous notice, we have
concluded that the application of
designated phytosanitary measures will
be sufficient to mitigate the risks of
introducing or disseminating plant pests
via the importation of fresh figs from
Peru.
DATES:
Effective August 10, 2016.
Ms.
Claudia Ferguson, Senior Regulatory
Policy Specialist, Regulatory
Coordination and Compliance, Imports,
Regulations, and Manuals, PPQ, APHIS,
4700 River Road, Unit 133, Riverdale,
MD 20737–1231; (301) 851–2352;
Claudia.Ferguson@aphis.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Under the
regulations in ‘‘Subpart–Fruits and
Vegetables’’ (7 CFR 319.56–1 through
319.56–75, referred to below as the
regulations), the Animal and Plant
Health Inspection Service (APHIS)
prohibits or restricts the importation of
fruits and vegetables into the United
States from certain parts of the world to
prevent plant pests from being
introduced into or disseminated within
the United States.
Section 319.56–4 contains a
performance-based process for
approving the importation of certain
fruits and vegetables that, based on the
findings of a pest risk analysis, can be
safely imported subject to one or more
of the designated phytosanitary
measures listed in paragraph (b) of that
section.
In accordance with that process, we
published a notice 1 in the Federal
Register on March 14, 2016 (81 FR
13310–13311, Docket No. APHIS–2016–
0011), in which we announced the
availability, for review and comment, of
a pest risk assessment (PRA) that
identifies pests of quarantine
significance that could follow the
pathway of importation of figs from
Peru into the continental United States.
Based on the PRA, a risk management
document (RMD) was prepared to
identify phytosanitary measures that
could be applied to the figs to mitigate
the pest risk. The RMD recommended
that all of the following phytosanitary
measures be applied to the importation
of figs from Peru into the continental
United States:
• The figs must be imported as
commercial consignments only;
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT:
1 To view the notice, PRA, RMD, and comments
we received, go to https://www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2016-0011.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4703
Sfmt 4703
• Each consignment of figs must be
accompanied by a phytosanitary
certificate issued by the national plant
protection organization (NPPO) of Peru;
• Each consignment of figs must be
treated in accordance with 7 CFR part
305; and
• Each consignment of figs is subject
to inspection upon arrival at the port of
entry to the United States.
We solicited comments on the PRA
and RMD for 60 days, ending on May
13, 2016. We received four comments by
that date, from a State department of
agriculture, the Peruvian Government,
the Peruvian embassy, and a U.S. port
of entry.
Three of the commenters supported
the importation of fresh figs from Peru
into the continental United States.
One commenter pointed out that the
notice would allow figs from Peru to be
irradiated in the United States. The
commenter expressed concern that this
could present a risk of introducing
quarantine pests that could follow the
pathway of figs from Peru into the
United States, and that such
introduction would present a significant
risk to States in which the pests could
become established. For this reason, the
commenter stated that irradiation
should either have to take place in Peru
or in areas of the United States north of
the 39th parallel, in which the pests
could not become established.
We appreciate the commenter’s
concern regarding irradiation of the figs
in areas of the United States where
quarantine plant pests that could
potentially follow the pathway of
importation of the figs from Peru could
become established. Indeed, our
regulations governing the approval of
irradiation facilities in the United
States, which are found in 7 CFR 305.9,
require that, if an irradiation facility is
located in a State where quarantine
pests that are targeted by irradiation
could become established, then it must
take additional safeguards, specified
within that section, in order to address
this pest risk. However, because § 305.9
also allows irradiation treatment for
imported commodities to take place
within the United States, and does not
preclude it from taking place in States
where establishment of quarantine pests
is possible, such as areas south of the
39th parallel, we cannot grant the
commenter’s request.
Therefore, in accordance with
§ 319.56–4(c)(2)(ii), we are announcing
our decision to authorize the
importation of figs from Peru into the
continental United States subject to all
of the following phytosanitary
measures:
E:\FR\FM\10AUN1.SGM
10AUN1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 154 (Wednesday, August 10, 2016)]
[Notices]
[Pages 52811-52812]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-18985]
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
[Docket No. APHIS-2015-0055]
Concurrence With OIE Risk Designations for Bovine Spongiform
Encephalopathy
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Notice.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are advising the public of our decision to concur with the
World Organization for Animal Health's (OIE) bovine spongiform
encephalopathy (BSE) risk designations for 14 regions. The OIE
recognizes these regions as being of negligible risk for BSE. We are
taking this action based on our review of information supporting the
OIE's risk designations for these regions.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Dr. Roberta Morales, Senior Staff
Veterinarian, Regionalization Evaluation Services, National Import
Export Services, VS, APHIS, 920 Main Campus Drive, Suite 200, Raleigh,
NC 27606; (919) 855-7735.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The regulations in 9 CFR part 92 subpart B,
``Importation of Animals and Animal Products; Procedures for Requesting
BSE Risk Status Classification With Regard to Bovines'' (referred to
below as the regulations), set forth the process by which the Animal
and Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS) classifies regions for
bovine spongiform encephalopathy (BSE) risk. Section 92.5 of the
regulations provides that all countries of the world are considered by
APHIS to be in one of three BSE risk categories: Negligible risk,
controlled risk, or undetermined risk. These risk categories are
defined in Sec. 92.1. Any region that is not classified by APHIS as
presenting either negligible risk or controlled risk for BSE is
considered to present an undetermined risk. The list of those regions
classified by APHIS as having either negligible risk or controlled risk
can be accessed on the APHIS Web site at https://www.aphis.usda.gov/aphis/ourfocus/animalhealth/animal-and-animal-product-import-information/ct_animal_disease_status. The list can also be obtained by
writing to APHIS at National Import Export Services, 4700 River Road
Unit 38, Riverdale, MD 20737.
Under the regulations, APHIS may classify a region for BSE in one
of two ways. One way is for countries that have not received a risk
classification from the World Organization for Animal Health (OIE) to
request classification by APHIS. The other way is for APHIS to concur
with the classification given to a country by the OIE.
If the OIE has recognized a country as either BSE negligible risk
or BSE controlled risk, APHIS will seek information to support our
concurrence with the OIE classification. This information may be
publicly available information, or APHIS may request that countries
supply the same information given to the OIE. APHIS will announce in
the Federal Register, subject to public comment, its intent to concur
with an OIE classification.
In accordance with that process, we published a notice \1\ in the
Federal Register on December 4, 2015 (80 FR 75849, Docket No. APHIS-
2015-0055), in which we announced our intent to concur with the OIE
risk designations for 16 regions. The OIE recognizes these regions as
being of negligible risk for BSE. We solicited comments on the notice
for 60 days ending on February 2, 2016. We received two comments by
that date, from a private citizen and a representative of a foreign
government.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ To view the notice and the comments we received, go to
https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2015-0055.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
One commenter stated that if a product is being imported only for
use in pet food, then the BSE risk status of the exporting region
should not be an issue.
We disagree that bovine products imported for use in pet food do
not pose a risk for introducing or spreading BSE in the United States.
It is possible that pet foods could be used for cattle feed, either by
accidental misfeeding of pet foods to cattle or by misusing salvage pet
food for cattle. Farms that raise multiple species (e.g. dogs, swine,
and cattle) present a particular risk for misfeeding.
The other commenter stated that the United States does not
recognize all the OIE's risk designations for BSE, noting that the
United States still considers several countries as controlled risk
regions though the OIE has classified them as negligible risk.
As we explained above, Sec. 92.5 of the regulations provides two
ways that APHIS may classify a region for BSE. One way is for countries
that have not received a risk classification from the OIE to request
classification by APHIS. The other way is for APHIS to concur with the
classification given to a country by the OIE. If the OIE has recognized
a country as either BSE negligible risk or BSE controlled risk, APHIS
will seek information to support our concurrence with the OIE
classification. This information may be publicly available information,
or APHIS may request that countries supply the same information given
to the OIE.
The length of APHIS's review of information in support of
concurrence depends on a number of factors, including whether the
information is publicly available, and, if it is not publicly
available, how quickly a country responds to our request for
information. This notice updates APHIS' list of regions recognized as
negligible risk for BSE to include all the regions for which we have
been able to review information. We intend to announce concurrence with
additional countries recognized by the OIE in a future notice.
One commenter noted that while the OIE guidelines call for removal
of specified risk materials (SRMs) from animals older than 30 months of
age, our regulations require the removal of SRMs from animals 30 months
of age or older. The commenter stated that while this is not a
significant difference from an epidemiological perspective, it creates
a major problem for certification through the veterinary services of
exporting countries and presents a barrier to trade.
APHIS notes that the wording ``30 months of age or older'' is
consistent with Food Safety and Inspection Service (FSIS) and U.S. Food
and Drug Administration (FDA) regulations as well as with Canadian
regulations. We also note that anyone wishing to import bovine products
into the United States must also meet FSIS or FDA requirements as well
as APHIS requirements. We do not anticipate that this difference will
have a significant impact on trade.
[[Page 52812]]
In the December 2015 notice, we mistakenly announced our intent to
recognize Romania as a region of negligible risk for BSE. In December
2014, the OIE suspended Romania's status as a negligible risk region
because Romania reported a case of atypical BSE. Since then, the OIE
has announced its intent to reinstate Romania's status as a region of
negligible risk for BSE. We will be seeking information to verify
Romania's status and will announce our intent to concur with the OIE's
designation in a future notice.
Also in the December 2015 notice, we announced our intent to
recognize France as a region of negligible risk for BSE in concurrence
with the OIE. Since then, France has confirmed a case of classical BSE
in a 5-year-old cow. Accordingly, the OIE has suspended France's status
as a region of negligible risk for BSE and reinstated its status as a
region of controlled risk effective March 25, 2016. For this reason we
have removed France from the list of regions of negligible risk for BSE
in this document. We will continue to recognize France as a region of
controlled risk for BSE.
Therefore, in accordance with the regulations in Sec. 92.5, we are
announcing our decision to concur with the OIE risk classifications of
the following countries:
Regions of negligible risk for BSE: Bulgaria, Cyprus,
Czech Republic, Estonia, Hungary, India, Korea (Republic of), Latvia,
Liechtenstein, Luxembourg, Malta, Portugal, Slovakia, and Switzerland.
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 1622 and 8301-8317; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a;
31 U.S.C. 9701; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.4.
Done in Washington, DC, this 4th day of August, 2016.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-18985 Filed 8-9-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P