Importation of Fresh Apple and Pear Fruit Into the Continental United States From Certain Countries in the European Union, 3033-3038 [2016-00992]
Download as PDF
3033
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
Vol. 81, No. 12
Wednesday, January 20, 2016
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER
contains notices to the public of the proposed
issuance of rules and regulations. The
purpose of these notices is to give interested
persons an opportunity to participate in the
rule making prior to the adoption of the final
rules.
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection
Service
7 CFR Part 319
[Docket No. APHIS–2015–0073]
RIN 0579–AE18
Importation of Fresh Apple and Pear
Fruit Into the Continental United States
From Certain Countries in the
European Union
Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
AGENCY:
We are proposing to amend
the regulations to allow the importation
of fresh apple and pear fruit from
certain countries in the European Union
into the continental United States,
provided that the fruit is produced in
accordance with a systems approach, as
an alternative to importation under the
current preclearance program. The
proposed systems approach for fresh
apple and pear fruit consists of
production site and packinghouse
registration, inspection of registered
production sites twice a season,
production site pest control and
sanitation, post-harvest safeguards, fruit
culling, traceback, sampling, cold
treatment against Mediterranean fruit fly
in countries where the pest is known to
occur, a phytosanitary certificate, port of
entry inspection, and importation as
commercial consignments only. Fresh
apple and pear fruit that does not meet
the requirements in the systems
approach would continue to be allowed
to be imported into the United States
subject to the conditions of the
preclearance program. This action
would provide an alternative for the
importation of fresh apple and pear fruit
from certain countries in the European
Union while continuing to provide
protection against the introduction of
plant pests into the continental United
States.
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
SUMMARY:
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:49 Jan 19, 2016
Jkt 238001
We will consider all comments
that we receive on or before March 21,
2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments
by either of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2015-0073.
• Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery:
Send your comment to Docket No.
APHIS–2015–0073, Regulatory Analysis
and Development, PPD, APHIS, Station
3A–03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118,
Riverdale, MD 20737–1238.
Supporting documents and any
comments we receive on this docket
may be viewed at https://
www.regulations.gov/
#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2015-0073 or
in our reading room, which is located in
room 1141 of the USDA South Building,
14th Street and Independence Avenue
SW., Washington, DC. Normal reading
room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m.,
Monday through Friday, except
holidays. To be sure someone is there to
help you, please call (202) 799–7039
before coming.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr.
David B. Lamb, Senior Regulatory
Policy Specialist, USDA/APHIS/PPQ,
4700 River Road Unit 133, Riverdale,
MD 20737–1236; (301) 851–2103;
David.B.Lamb@aphis.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
DATES:
Background
Under the regulations in ‘‘Subpart—
Fruits and Vegetables’’ (7 CFR 319.56–
1 through 319.56–74, referred to below
as the regulations or the fruits and
vegetables regulations), the Animal and
Plant Health Inspection Service (APHIS)
of the United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA) prohibits or
restricts the importation of fruits and
vegetables into the United States from
certain parts of the world to prevent
plant pests from being introduced into
and spread within the United States.
Currently, § 319.56–22 provides
conditions for importation of fresh
apple fruit (Malus domestica Borkh.)
from Belgium, Denmark, France,
Germany, Great Britain, Italy, the
Netherlands, Northern Ireland, Norway,
Portugal, the Republic of Ireland, Spain,
Sweden, and Switzerland, and fresh
pear fruit (Pyrus communis L.) from
Belgium, France, Great Britain, Italy, the
Netherlands, Portugal, and Spain, into
the United States under a preclearance
PO 00000
Frm 00001
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
program. Conditions for importation of
fresh apple and pear fruit from the
above countries include a trust fund
agreement between the national plant
protection organization (NPPO) of the
exporting country and APHIS; orchard
and packinghouse inspections for
Leucoptera malifoliella and other
quarantine plant pests; approved
mitigations for infested orchards; cold
treatment of fruit against Mediterranean
fruit fly (Ceratitis capitata, or Medfly) in
countries where the pest is known to
occur; identification of orchards and
packinghouses for traceback of each
consignment; packinghouse handling
and safeguarding requirements for fruit
intended for shipment to the United
States; and preclearance inspection.
As an alternative to the preclearance
program, the European Commission, the
executive body of the European Union
(EU), has requested that APHIS amend
the regulations to allow the importation
into the continental United States from
certain EU countries of fresh apple and
pear fruit that has been produced in
accordance with an approved systems
approach. Any alternative approach to
the preclearance program for importing
these articles requires that the current
regulations be amended.
As part of our evaluation of the EU’s
request, we prepared a pest list 1 of
quarantine pests that could follow the
pathway of commercial shipments of
fresh apple and pear fruit into the
continental United States from the EU
member countries included in the
request. A quarantine pest is defined in
§ 319.56–2 as ‘‘a pest of potential
economic importance to the area
endangered thereby and not yet present
there, or present but not widely
distributed and being officially
controlled.’’ The pest list reported 32
quarantine pests (26 arthropods, 1
bacterium, 4 fungi and 1 viroid) that
may follow the pathway of commercial
shipments of apples and pears into the
continental United States. They are:
Arthropods:
Adoxophyes orana (Fischer von
¨
Roeslerstamm) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)
Aphanostigma piri (Cholodkovsky)
(Hemiptera: Phylloxeridae)
1 ‘‘Pest List for Importation of Fresh Fruit of
Apple, Malus domestica, and Pear, Pyrus
communis, into the Continental United States from
eight countries in the European Union (Belgium,
Germany, France, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Spain, the
Netherlands)’’ (USDA, 2014).
E:\FR\FM\20JAP1.SGM
20JAP1
3034
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 20, 2016 / Proposed Rules
Archips podana (Scopoli) (Lepidoptera:
Tortricidae)
Argyrotaenia pulchellana (Haworth)
(Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)
Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera:
Tephritidae)
Ceroplastes japonicus Green (Hemiptera:
Coccidae)
Choristoneura hebenstreitella (Muller)
(Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)
Cryptoblabes gnidiella (Milliere)
(Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)
Cydia pyrivora (Danilevsky) (Lepidoptera:
Tortricidae)
Diloba caeruleocephala (L.) (Lepidoptera:
Noctuidae)
Eutetranychus orientalis (Klein) (Acari:
Tetranychidae)
Euzophera bigella (Zeller) (Lepidoptera:
Pyralidae)
Grapholita funebrana Treitschke
(Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)
Grapholita lobarzewskii (Nowicki)
(Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)
Hedya pruniana (Hubner) (Lepidoptera:
Tortricidae)
Lacanobia oleracea L. (Lepidoptera:
Noctuidae)
Leucoptera malifoliella (Costa) (Lepidoptera:
Lyonetiidae)
Lobesia botrana Dennis & Schiffermuller
(Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)
Mamestra brassicae L. (Lepidoptera:
Noctuidae)
Pammene rhediella (Clerck) (Lepidoptera:
Tortricidae)
Pandemis cerasana (Hubner) (Lepidoptera:
Tortricidae)
Pandemis heparana (Denis & Schiffermuller)
(Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)
Rhynchites aequatus (L.) (Coleoptera:
Curculionidae)
Rhynchites auratus (Scopoli) (Coleoptera:
Curculionidae)
Rhynchites bacchus (L.) (Coleoptera:
Curculionidae)
Syndemis musculana (Hubner) (Lepidoptera:
Tortricidae)
Bacteria:
Erwinia pyrifoliae Kim et al.
Fungi:
Alternaria gaisen Nagano (Ascomycetes:
Pleosporales)
Ascochyta pyricola Sacc. (Ascomycetes:
Pleosporales)
Monilinia fructigena Honey ex Whetzel
(Ascomycetes: Helotiales)
Monilinia polystroma (G.C.M. Leeuwen)
Kohn (Ascomycetes: Helotiales)
Viroid:
Pear blister canker viroid (PBCVd) 2
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
We prepared a risk management
document (RMD) to determine what
phytosanitary measures should be
2 Apples and pears infected with the plant
pathogenic pear blister canker viroid (PBCVd) are
not a pathway. The pathogen is not insect or seed
transmitted, and cannot be transmitted from the
vascular tissue of fruit (Hadidi et al., 2011). This
systemic pathogen could be present in the fruit, but
it will not establish in the United States because the
pathogen is neither seed transmitted nor insect
vectored (Flores et al., 2003). Since there is no
evidence that apples or pears are pathways for
PBCVd (USDA, 2014) we would not require any
mitigation measures for the disease.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:49 Jan 19, 2016
Jkt 238001
applied to mitigate the pest risk
associated with the importation of fresh
apple and pear fruit from certain EU
member countries into the continental
United States. Copies of the pest list and
RMD may be obtained from the person
listed under FOR FURTHER INFORMATION
CONTACT or viewed on the
Regulations.gov Web site (see
ADDRESSES above for a link to
Regulations.gov and information on the
location and hours of the reading room).
In the RMD, entitled, ‘‘Importation of
Fresh Fruit of Apple, Malus domestica,
and Pear, Pyrus communis, into the
Continental United States from eight
countries in the European Union
(Belgium, Germany, France, Italy,
Poland, Portugal, Spain, the
Netherlands),’’ (July 2015), we
determined that phytosanitary measures
could be applied as a systems approach
to mitigate the risks of introducing or
disseminating the quarantine pests in
the pest list into the continental United
States. Therefore, we are proposing to
allow the importation of fresh apple and
pear fruit from the EU countries of
Belgium, Germany, France, Italy,
Poland, Portugal, Spain, and the
Netherlands into the continental United
States if the fruit is produced under the
systems approach described below.
Fresh apple and pear fruit that does not
meet the conditions of the systems
approach would still be allowed to be
imported into the continental United
States if it is produced in accordance
with the requirements of § 319.56–22.
Fruit imported under § 319.56–22
would still be required to be in
commercial consignments and
accompanied by documentation to
validate foreign site preclearance
inspection after the required treatment
is completed.
We have determined that the specific
mitigation measures proposed for the
quarantine pests identified in the pest
list, along with the general requirements
for the importation of fruits and
vegetables in the regulations, will be
sufficient to prevent the introduction of
quarantine pests into the continental
United States via importation of fresh
apple and pear fruit from the EU
countries listed above. Therefore, we are
proposing to add the systems approach
to the regulations in a new § 319.56–75.
General Requirements
Paragraph (a) of proposed § 319.56–75
would set out general requirements for
the NPPO of the exporting country and
for growers and packers producing fresh
apple and pear fruit for export to the
continental United States.
Paragraph (a)(1) of proposed § 319.56–
75 would require the NPPO of the
PO 00000
Frm 00002
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
exporting country to develop an
operational workplan, subject to APHIS
approval, that details the activities that
the NPPO would carry out to meet the
requirements of proposed § 319.56–75.
An operational workplan is an
agreement developed between APHIS’
Plant Protection and Quarantine
program, officials of the NPPO of a
foreign government, and, when
necessary, foreign commercial entities,
that specifies in detail the phytosanitary
measures that will be carried out to
comply with our regulations governing
the importation of a specific
commodity. Operational workplans
apply only to the signatory parties and
establish detailed procedures and
guidance for the day-to-day operations
of specific import/export programs.
Operational workplans also establish
how specific phytosanitary issues are
dealt with in the exporting country and
make clear who is responsible for
dealing with those issues. The
implementation of a systems approach
typically requires an operational
workplan to be developed. The
operational workplan may include, but
is not limited to, details of the orchard
monitoring, pest action thresholds,
orchard phytosanitary measures
including removing fallen fruit,
packinghouse inspection procedures,
and traceback requirements.
Paragraph (a)(2) of proposed § 319.56–
75 would state that only commercial
consignments of fresh apple and pear
fruit from certain EU countries would be
allowed to be imported into the
continental United States. Commercial
consignments, as defined in § 319.56–2,
are consignments that an inspector
identifies as having been imported for
sale and distribution. Such
identification is based on a variety of
indicators, including, but not limited to:
Quantity of produce, type of packaging,
identification of grower or packinghouse
on the packaging, and documents
consigning the fruits or vegetables to a
wholesaler or retailer. Commercial
consignments are less likely to be
infested with plant pests than
noncommercial consignments.
Noncommercial consignments are more
prone to infestations because the
commodity is often ripe to overripe,
may be of a variety with unknown
susceptibility to pests, and is often
grown with little or no pest control.
Production Site Requirements
Under proposed § 319.56–75(b)(1),
production sites where fresh apple or
pear fruit is grown would be required to
be registered with the NPPO of the
exporting country. Such registration
would facilitate traceback of a
E:\FR\FM\20JAP1.SGM
20JAP1
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 20, 2016 / Proposed Rules
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
consignment of fresh apple or pear fruit
to the production site in the event that
quarantine pests were discovered in the
consignment at the port of first arrival
into the continental United States.
APHIS would reserve the right to
conduct oversight visits at the
production site in the event of pest
interceptions or other problems.
Under proposed paragraph (b)(2), the
registered grower of the production site
would be responsible for following the
phytosanitary measures agreed upon by
APHIS and the NPPO of the exporting
country, including removal of fallen
fruit and other control measures that are
authorized for use in the EU and the
United States to reduce pest
populations. The NPPO of the exporting
country or officials authorized by the
NPPO would be responsible for
monitoring pest populations at
production sites in order to determine
the need and timing of such control
measures and ensure effective control of
pests. The NPPO would also be required
to ensure that registered production
sites are inspected twice every season,
with special emphasis on quarantine
pests listed in the operational workplan.
Details of production site traceback
and pest monitoring requirements, pest
action thresholds, field sanitation, and
other phytosanitary measures would be
included in the operational workplan
approved by the NPPO of the exporting
country and APHIS.
Paragraph 319.56–75(b)(3) would
require that apple and pear propagative
material introduced into registered
production sites be certified free of
quarantine pests by the NPPO of the
exporting country.
remove the leaf mining pest Leucoptera
malifoliella. Packinghouse culling and
inspection procedures would have to be
followed to remove fruit with pupae of
Leucoptera malifoliella. These
procedures would be detailed in the
operational workplan.
Under paragraph (c)(3), all packed
fruit intended for shipment to the
United States would need to be
safeguarded from infestation by fruit
flies and other pests at the packinghouse
and during transport to the continental
United States. Safeguarding measures
for packinghouses and packed fruit,
which would be detailed in the
operational workplan, include
protecting fruit by a pest-proof screen or
plastic tarpaulin while the fruit is in
transit to the packinghouse and while
awaiting packing. Other safeguarding
measures include the use of
packinghouse screens and double doors
that are sufficient to prevent pests from
entering the packing area and requiring
fruit to be packed in insect-proof cartons
or containers, or covered with insectproof mesh or a plastic tarpaulin, for
transport to the United States.
Under proposed paragraph (c)(4),
apple and pear fruit would have to be
held in a cold storage facility while
awaiting export. If any other fruit from
unregistered production sites are stored
in the same facility, the apple and pear
fruit must be isolated from that other
fruit.
Under proposed § 319.75(c)(5), each
shipping box would need to be marked
with the identity of the packing facility,
the production site, and grower or
grower organization to enable trace back
as necessary.
Packinghouse Requirements
Paragraph (c) of proposed § 319.56–75
would set forth requirements for pest
mitigation, fruit sampling, inspection,
and other measures that would have to
take place at registered packinghouses
under the operational workplan.
Under proposed § 319.75(c)(1), all
fresh apple and pear fruit for export to
the United States would be required to
be packed in packinghouses that are
registered and approved by the NPPO of
the exporting country. Packinghouses
would have to be able to exclude plant
pests and have a tracking system to
identify individual production sites.
Requirements for packinghouse
specifications and procedures would be
detailed in the operational workplan.
Under proposed § 319.75(c)(2),
packinghouses would not be permitted
to pack apple or pear fruit for other
countries while packing for the
continental United States. All leaves
would have to be removed from fruit to
Mitigations for Medfly
Under proposed § 319.56–75(d), apple
and pear fruit being exported from
countries where APHIS has determined
that Medfly is known to occur would be
required to undergo cold treatment in
accordance with the phytosanitary
treatments regulations in 7 CFR part
305. Currently, treatment schedule T
107–a 3 is approved for apples and pears
from countries where Medfly is known
to occur. Details of required cold
treatment procedures would be
included in the operational workplan.
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:49 Jan 19, 2016
Jkt 238001
Phytosanitary Inspection
Paragraph § 319.56–75(e) would
require that, after post-harvest
processing, the NPPO of the exporting
country or officials authorized by the
NPPO of the exporting country inspect
3 USDA/PPQ
Treatment Manual, section 5,
Treatment Schedules. https://www.aphis.usda.gov/
import_export/plants/manuals/ports/downloads/
treatment.pdf.
PO 00000
Frm 00003
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3035
the apple and pear fruit for signs of pest
infestation and confirm absence of the
pests listed in the operational workplan.
Upon detection of Adoxophyes orana,
Alternaria gaisen, Argyrotaenia
pulchellana, Ascochyta piricola,
Ceratitis capitata, Grapholita (Cydia)
funebrana, Leucoptera malifoliella,
Monilinia fructigena and/or Monilinia
polystroma in a consignment for export,
the NPPO of the exporting country
would be required to reject that
consignment and may, under conditions
specified in the operational workplan,
be required to suspend the production
site and/or packinghouse from
importation to the continental United
States for the remainder of that season.
If any of these pests are found in a
consignment at U.S. ports of entry,
APHIS may, under conditions specified
in the operational workplan, reject the
consignment and suspend imports from
the production site and/or packinghouse
until an investigation is completed by
the NPPO of the exporting country and
APHIS. The investigation may include
site visits by APHIS and reports from
the NPPO of the exporting country.
Procedures for suspension of production
sites and/or packinghouses would be
detailed in the operational workplan.
The exportation to the continental
United States of fresh apple and pear
fruit from a suspended production site
and/or packinghouse may resume in the
next growing season if an investigation
is conducted and APHIS and the NPPO
of the exporting country agree that
appropriate remedial actions have been
taken.
Phytosanitary Certificate
Paragraph § 319.56–75 (f) would
require that each consignment of fresh
apple or pear fruit be accompanied by
a phytosanitary certificate issued by the
NPPO of the exporting country.
Requiring a phytosanitary certificate
ensures that the NPPO of the exporting
country has inspected the fruit and
certified that the fruit meets the
conditions under the systems approach
for export to the continental United
States.
APHIS has determined that the above
risk management measures under the
proposed systems approach will
mitigate the risk of pest introductions
on fresh apple and pear fruit from
Belgium, Germany, France, Italy,
Poland, Portugal, Spain, and the
Netherlands into the continental United
States.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory
Flexibility Act
This proposed rule has been reviewed
under Executive Order 12866. The
E:\FR\FM\20JAP1.SGM
20JAP1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
3036
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 20, 2016 / Proposed Rules
proposed rule has been determined to
be not significant for the purposes of
Executive Order 12866 and, therefore,
has not been reviewed by the Office of
Management and Budget.
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 603, we
have performed an initial regulatory
flexibility analysis, which is
summarized below, regarding the
economic effects of this proposed rule
on small entities. Copies of the full
analysis are available by contacting the
person listed under FOR FURTHER
INFORMATION CONTACT or on the
Regulations.gov Web site (see
ADDRESSES above for instructions for
accessing Regulations.gov).
Based on the information we have,
there is no reason to conclude that
adoption of this proposed rule would
result in any significant economic effect
on a substantial number of small
entities. However, we do not currently
have all of the data necessary for a
comprehensive analysis of the effects of
this proposed rule on small entities.
Therefore, we are inviting comments on
potential effects. In particular, we are
interested in determining the number
and kind of small entities that may
incur benefits or costs from the
implementation of this proposed rule.
This proposed rule would allow the
importation of fresh apples (Malus
domestica) and fresh pears (Pyrus
communis) from eight European Union
(EU) countries (Belgium, France,
Germany, Italy, the Netherlands,
Poland, Portugal, and Spain, referred to
here as the EU–8) into the continental
United States, if they are produced in
accordance with an approved systems
approach. At present, importation of
fresh pear from Germany and fresh
apple and fresh pear from Poland is not
allowed. For the other EU–8 countries,
this action would provide an alternative
to current preclearance import
requirements.
The United States and the EU both
have large apple and pear industries.
U.S. demand for EU–8 apples and pears
imported under the proposed rule
would depend on relative prices and on
market characteristics as determined by
domestic and foreign supplies and
consumer preferences. The
competitiveness of EU–8 apples and
pears would largely rest on their prices,
the varieties shipped, and their quality.
The EU estimates that annual apple
and pear exports by the EU–8 to the
United States would total 14,000 MT
under the proposed rule. EU–8 apple
and pear exports in recent years to
countries outside of the EU show the
quantity of apples to have been four
times that of pears. For our analysis, we
apportion the 14,000 MT similarly, that
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:49 Jan 19, 2016
Jkt 238001
is, 80 percent apple (11,200 MT) and 20
percent pear (2,800 MT).
Apple and pear imports from the
EU–8 would directly compete with U.S.
produced fruit since the growing
seasons are the same. Most apple and
pear imports by the United States come
from southern hemisphere countries (89
percent of apple imports, 78 percent of
pear imports) and, notwithstanding
year-round storage capabilities, we
expect any displacement of apple and
pear imports from current sources by
EU–8 shipments would be limited due
to different growing seasons. For this
analysis, we therefore assume that not
more than 10 percent of U.S. apple and
pear imports from the EU–8 countries
would displace imports from elsewhere.
We use a non-spatial, net trade,
partial equilibrium approach to welfare
analysis to compute expected impacts of
the proposed rule on U.S. producers and
consumers. We model changes in U.S.
consumption, production, price,
consumer welfare, and producer welfare
for three import levels (the expected
quantity, and this quantity plus or
minus 10 percent). In all cases,
consumer welfare gains under the
proposed rule outweigh producer
welfare losses, yielding a positive net
welfare impact. The expected net
benefit for the two fruits exceeds $1.3
million per year.
For apples, producer welfare losses
under the three import levels range
between $9.2 million and $11.2 million,
the equivalent of about 0.3 percent of
the annual value of fresh apple
production. Consumer welfare gains
range between $10.0 million and $12.2
million, yielding net welfare gains of
between $800,000 and $1 million.
Apple prices are calculated to decline
by about 0.5 percent when 11,200 MT
of fresh apples are imported annually
from the EU–8. This quantity is
equivalent to about 0.5 percent of
annual fresh apple consumption in the
United States.
For pears, producer welfare losses
under the three import levels range
between $1.9 million and $2.3 million,
coincidentally also equivalent to about
0.3 percent of the annual value of fresh
pear production. Consumer welfare
gains range between $2.3 million and
$2.8 million, and net welfare gains are
less than $500,000. Pear prices are
calculated to decline by about 0.4
percent when 2,800 MT of fresh pears
are imported annually from the EU–8.
This quantity is equivalent to about 0.7
percent of annual fresh pear
consumption in the United States.
Small-entity apple and pear producers
may be directly affected by the proposed
rule. Other small entities that may be
PO 00000
Frm 00004
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
affected include those in auxiliary
industries that support the production
and distribution of fresh apples and
pears in the United States, as well as
importers of fresh apples and pears.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule would allow fresh
apple and pear fruit to be imported into
the continental United States from
certain EU countries under a systems
approach. If this proposed rule is
adopted, State and local laws and
regulations regarding fresh apple and
pear fruit imported under this rule
would be preempted while the fruit is
in foreign commerce. Fresh fruits are
generally imported for immediate
distribution and sale to the consuming
public and would remain in foreign
commerce until sold to the ultimate
consumer. The question of when foreign
commerce ceases in other cases must be
addressed on a case-by-case basis. If this
proposed rule is adopted, no retroactive
effect will be given to this rule, and this
rule will not require administrative
proceedings before parties may file suit
in court challenging this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with section 3507(d) of
the Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995
(44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the information
collection or recordkeeping
requirements included in this proposed
rule have been submitted for approval to
the Office of Management and Budget
(OMB). Please send written comments
to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attention:
Desk Officer for APHIS, Washington, DC
20503. Please state that your comments
refer to Docket No. APHIS–2015–0073.
Please send a copy of your comments to:
(1) APHIS, using one of the methods
described under ADDRESSES at the
beginning of this document, and (2)
Clearance Officer, OCIO, USDA, room
404–W, 14th Street and Independence
Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250. A
comment to OMB is best assured of
having its full effect if OMB receives it
within 30 days of publication of this
proposed rule.
The regulations in ‘‘Subpart—Fruits
and Vegetables’’ (Title 7, Code of
Federal Regulations (CFR) 319.56
through 319.56–74, referred to as the
regulations), prohibit or restrict the
importation of fruits and vegetables into
the United States from certain parts of
the world to prevent the introduction
and dissemination of plant pests that are
new to or not widely distributed with
the United States.
APHIS is proposing to amend the
regulations to allow the importation of
fresh apple and pear fruit from certain
E:\FR\FM\20JAP1.SGM
20JAP1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 20, 2016 / Proposed Rules
countries in the European Union into
the continental United States, provided
that the fruit is produced in accordance
with a systems approach, as an
alternative to importation under the
current preclearance program. The
proposed systems approach for fresh
apple and pear fruit consists of
production site and packinghouse
registration, inspection of registered
production sites twice a season,
production site pest control and
sanitation, post-harvest safeguards, fruit
culling, traceback, sampling, cold
treatment against Mediterranean fruit fly
in countries where the pest is known to
occur, a phytosanitary certificate, port of
entry inspection, and importation as
commercial consignments only. Fresh
apple and pear fruit that does not meet
the requirements in the systems
approach would continue to be allowed
to be imported into the United States
subject to the conditions of the
preclearance program.
This action would provide an
alternative for the importation of fresh
apple and pear fruit from certain
countries in the European Union while
continuing to provide protection against
the introduction of plant pests into the
continental United States.
Implementing this rule will require an
operational workplan, production site
and packing house registrations,
tracking system, monitoring,
inspections, investigations, box
markings, cold treatment burden
requirements, and phytosanitary
certificates.
We are soliciting comments from the
public (as well as affected agencies)
concerning our proposed information
collection and recordkeeping
requirements. These comments will
help us:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed
information collection is necessary for
the proper performance of our agency’s
functions, including whether the
information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of our
estimate of the burden of the proposed
information collection, including the
validity of the methodology and
assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and
clarity of the information to be
collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the
information collection on those who are
to respond (such as through the use of
appropriate automated, electronic,
mechanical, or other technological
collection techniques or other forms of
information technology; e.g., permitting
electronic submission of responses).
Estimate of burden: Public reporting
burden for this collection of information
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:49 Jan 19, 2016
Jkt 238001
is estimated to average .00627 hours per
response.
Respondents: Foreign businesses and
NPPOs.
Estimated annual number of
respondents: 72.
Estimated annual number of
responses per respondent: 2,230.
Estimated annual number of
responses: 160,553.
Estimated total annual burden on
respondents: 1,007 hours. (Due to
averaging, the total annual burden hours
may not equal the product of the annual
number of responses multiplied by the
reporting burden per response.)
Copies of this information collection
can be obtained from Ms. Kimberly
Hardy, APHIS’ Information Collection
Coordinator, at (301) 851–2727.
E-Government Act Compliance
The Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service is committed to
compliance with the EGovernment Act
to promote the use of the Internet and
other information technologies, to
provide increased opportunities for
citizen access to Government
information and services, and for other
purposes. For information pertinent to
E-Government Act compliance related
to this proposed rule, please contact Ms.
Kimberly Hardy, APHIS’ Information
Collection Coordinator, at (301) 851–
2727.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 319
Coffee, Cotton, Fruits, Imports, Logs,
Nursery stock, Plant diseases and pests,
Quarantine, Reporting and
recordkeeping requirements, Rice,
Vegetables.
Accordingly, we propose to amend 7
CFR part 319 as follows:
PART 319—FOREIGN QUARANTINE
NOTICES
1. The authority citation for part 319
continues to read as follows:
■
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701–7772, and
7781–7786; 21 U.S.C. 136 and 136a; 7 CFR
2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
2. In § 319.56–22, the introductory
text of paragraph (a) is revised to read
as follows:
■
§ 319.56–22 Apples and pears from certain
countries in Europe.
(a) Importations allowed. The
following fruits may be imported into
the United States in accordance with
this section and all other applicable
provisions of this subpart. See § 319.56–
75 for alternative provisions authorizing
the importation of apples and pears
from certain countries in Europe.
*
*
*
*
*
PO 00000
Frm 00005
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
3037
3. Section 319.56–75 is added to
subpart—Fruits and Vegetables to read
as follows:
■
§ 319.56–75 Fresh apple and pear fruit
from Belgium, Germany, France, Italy,
Poland, Portugal, Spain and the
Netherlands.
Fresh apple (Malus domestica Borkh.)
and fresh pear (Pyrus communis L.) fruit
from Belgium, Germany, France, Italy,
Poland, Portugal, Spain, and the
Netherlands may be imported into the
continental United States in accordance
with the conditions listed in this
section. See § 319.56–22 for alternative
provisions authorizing the importation
of apples and pears from certain
countries in Europe.
(a) General requirements. (1) The
NPPO of the exporting country must
develop an operational workplan,
subject to APHIS approval, that details
the activities that the NPPO would carry
out to meet the requirements of this
section.
(2) The fresh apple and pear fruit
must be imported in commercial
consignments only.
(b) Production site requirements. (1)
Production sites where the fresh apple
and pear fruit is grown must be
registered with the NPPO of the
exporting country.
(2) The registered grower of the
production site must follow the
phytosanitary measures agreed upon by
APHIS and the NPPO of the exporting
country in the operational workplan,
including applying control measures
that are authorized for use in the EU and
the United States to reduce pest
populations. The NPPO of the exporting
country or officials authorized by the
NPPO must monitor pest populations at
production sites in order to determine
the need and timing of such control
measures and ensure effective control of
pests. The NPPO must also ensure that
registered production sites are inspected
twice every season with emphasis on
the quarantine pests listed in the
operational workplan.
(3) Any apple and pear propagative
material introduced into registered
production sites must be certified free of
quarantine pests by the NPPO of the
exporting country.
(c) Packinghouse requirements. (1) All
fresh apple and pear fruit for export to
the continental United States must be
packed in packinghouses that are
registered and approved by the NPPO of
the exporting country. Packinghouses
must be able to exclude plant pests and
have a tracking system to identify
individual production sites in
accordance with the operational
workplan.
E:\FR\FM\20JAP1.SGM
20JAP1
tkelley on DSK3SPTVN1PROD with PROPOSALS
3038
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 20, 2016 / Proposed Rules
(2) Packinghouses must not pack
apple and pear fruit for other countries
while packing for shipment to the
continental United States. All leaves
must be removed from the fruit to
remove Leucoptera malifoliella, and
packinghouse culling and inspection
procedures must be followed to remove
fruit with pupae of Leucoptera
malifoliella.
(3) All packed fruit intended for
shipment to the continental United
States must be safeguarded from
infestation by fruit flies and other pests
while at the packinghouse and during
shipment to the continental United
States in accordance with the
operational workplan.
(4) Apple and pear fruit must be held
in a cold storage facility while awaiting
export. If any other fruit from
unregistered production sites are stored
in the same facility, the apple and pear
fruit must be isolated from that other
fruit.
(5) Each shipping box must be marked
with the identity of the packing facility,
the production site, and grower or
grower organization to ensure traceback.
(d) Mitigation for Mediterranean fruit
fly. Apple and pear fruit being exported
from countries where Mediterranean
fruit fly is known to occur must undergo
cold treatment in accordance with the
phytosanitary treatments regulations in
part 305 of this chapter. Cold treatment
procedures and schedules will be
included in the operational workplan.
(e) Phytosanitary inspection. After
post-harvest processing, the NPPO of
the exporting country or officials
authorized by the NPPO of the exporting
country must inspect the apple and pear
fruit for signs of pest infestation and
confirm absence of the pests listed in
the operational workplan. Upon
detection of Adoxophyes orana,
Alternaria gaisen, Argyrotaenia
pulchellana, Ascochyta piricola,
Ceratitis capitata, Grapholita (Cydia)
funebrana, Leucoptera malifoliella,
Monilinia fructigena and/or Monilinia
polystroma in a consignment for export,
the NPPO of the exporting country must
reject the consignment and may, under
conditions specified in the operational
workplan, be required to suspend the
production site and/or packinghouse
from importation to the continental
United States for the remainder of that
season. If any of these pests are found
in a consignment at U.S. ports of entry,
APHIS may, under conditions specified
in the operational workplan, reject the
consignment and suspend the
production site and/or packinghouse
from importation to the continental
United States until an investigation is
completed by the NPPO of the exporting
VerDate Sep<11>2014
16:49 Jan 19, 2016
Jkt 238001
country and APHIS. The investigation
may include site visits by APHIS and/
or reports from the NPPO of the
exporting country. Procedures for
suspension of production sites and/or
packinghouses will be detailed in the
operational workplan. The exportation
to the continental United States of fresh
apple and pear fruit from a suspended
production site and/or packinghouse
may resume in the next growing season
if an investigation is conducted and
APHIS and the NPPO of the exporting
country agree that appropriate remedial
actions have been taken.
(f) Phytosanitary certificate. Each
consignment of fresh apple or pear fruit
must be accompanied by a
phytosanitary certificate issued by the
NPPO of the exporting country
certifying that the fruit meets the
conditions under this section for export
to the continental United States.
Done in Washington, DC, this 13th day of
January 2016.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2016–00992 Filed 1–19–16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410–34–P
DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION
Federal Aviation Administration
14 CFR Part 39
[Docket No. FAA–2015–8471; Directorate
Identifier 2013–NM–153–AD]
RIN 2120–AA64
Airworthiness Directives; Bombardier,
Inc. Airplanes
Federal Aviation
Administration (FAA), DOT.
ACTION: Notice of proposed rulemaking
(NPRM).
AGENCY:
We propose to supersede
Airworthiness Directive (AD) 2010–23–
19, that applies to certain Bombardier,
Inc. Model CL–600–2C10 (Regional Jet
Series 700, 701, and 702) airplanes,
Model CL–600–2D15 (Regional Jet
Series 705) airplanes, and Model CL–
600–2D24 (Regional Jet Series 900)
airplanes. AD 2010–23–19 requires
repetitive inspections for damage of the
main landing gear (MLG) inboard doors
and fairing, and corrective actions if
necessary. Since we issued AD 2010–
23–19, we have received reports of the
MLG failing to fully extend. This
proposed AD would require repetitive
inspections for damage of the MLG
inboard doors, MLG fairing, and
adjacent structures of the MLG inboard
SUMMARY:
PO 00000
Frm 00006
Fmt 4702
Sfmt 4702
doors, and corrective actions if
necessary; replacement of the MLG
fairing seal; and a terminating action
involving increasing the clearances
between the MLG fairing and MLG door.
This proposed AD would also add one
airplane and remove others from the
applicability. We are proposing this AD
to prevent loss of controllability of the
airplane during landing.
DATES: We must receive comments on
this proposed AD by March 7, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may send comments by
any of the following methods:
• Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to
https://www.regulations.gov. Follow the
instructions for submitting comments.
• Fax: 202–493–2251.
• Mail: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC 20590.
• Hand Delivery: U.S. Department of
Transportation, Docket Operations, M–
30, West Building Ground Floor, Room
W12–140, 1200 New Jersey Avenue SE.,
Washington, DC, between 9 a.m. and 5
p.m., Monday through Friday, except
Federal holidays.
For service information identified in
this proposed AD, contact, Bombardier,
ˆ
Inc., 400 Cote-Vertu Road West, Dorval,
´
Quebec H4S 1Y9, Canada; telephone
514–855–5000; fax 514–855–7401; email
thd.crj@aero.bombardier.com; Internet
https://www.bombardier.com. You may
view this referenced service information
at the FAA, Transport Airplane
Directorate, 1601 Lind Avenue SW.,
Renton, WA. For information on the
availability of this material at the FAA,
call 425–227–1221.
Examining the AD Docket
You may examine the AD docket on
the Internet at https://
www.regulations.gov by searching for
and locating Docket No. FAA–2015–
8471; or in person at the Docket
Management Facility between 9 a.m.
and 5 p.m., Monday through Friday,
except Federal holidays. The AD docket
contains this proposed AD, the
regulatory evaluation, any comments
received, and other information. The
street address for the Docket Operations
office (telephone 800–647–5527) is in
the ADDRESSES section. Comments will
be available in the AD docket shortly
after receipt.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Ezra
Sasson, Aerospace Engineer, Airframe
and Mechanical Systems Branch, ANE–
171, FAA, New York Aircraft
Certification Office, 1600 Stewart
Avenue, Suite 410, Westbury, NY
11590; telephone 516–228–7320; fax
516–794–5531.
E:\FR\FM\20JAP1.SGM
20JAP1
Agencies
[Federal Register Volume 81, Number 12 (Wednesday, January 20, 2016)]
[Proposed Rules]
[Pages 3033-3038]
From the Federal Register Online via the Government Publishing Office [www.gpo.gov]
[FR Doc No: 2016-00992]
========================================================================
Proposed Rules
Federal Register
________________________________________________________________________
This section of the FEDERAL REGISTER contains notices to the public of
the proposed issuance of rules and regulations. The purpose of these
notices is to give interested persons an opportunity to participate in
the rule making prior to the adoption of the final rules.
========================================================================
Federal Register / Vol. 81, No. 12 / Wednesday, January 20, 2016 /
Proposed Rules
[[Page 3033]]
DEPARTMENT OF AGRICULTURE
Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service
7 CFR Part 319
[Docket No. APHIS-2015-0073]
RIN 0579-AE18
Importation of Fresh Apple and Pear Fruit Into the Continental
United States From Certain Countries in the European Union
AGENCY: Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service, USDA.
ACTION: Proposed rule.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY: We are proposing to amend the regulations to allow the
importation of fresh apple and pear fruit from certain countries in the
European Union into the continental United States, provided that the
fruit is produced in accordance with a systems approach, as an
alternative to importation under the current preclearance program. The
proposed systems approach for fresh apple and pear fruit consists of
production site and packinghouse registration, inspection of registered
production sites twice a season, production site pest control and
sanitation, post-harvest safeguards, fruit culling, traceback,
sampling, cold treatment against Mediterranean fruit fly in countries
where the pest is known to occur, a phytosanitary certificate, port of
entry inspection, and importation as commercial consignments only.
Fresh apple and pear fruit that does not meet the requirements in the
systems approach would continue to be allowed to be imported into the
United States subject to the conditions of the preclearance program.
This action would provide an alternative for the importation of fresh
apple and pear fruit from certain countries in the European Union while
continuing to provide protection against the introduction of plant
pests into the continental United States.
DATES: We will consider all comments that we receive on or before March
21, 2016.
ADDRESSES: You may submit comments by either of the following methods:
Federal eRulemaking Portal: Go to https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2015-0073.
Postal Mail/Commercial Delivery: Send your comment to
Docket No. APHIS-2015-0073, Regulatory Analysis and Development, PPD,
APHIS, Station 3A-03.8, 4700 River Road Unit 118, Riverdale, MD 20737-
1238.
Supporting documents and any comments we receive on this docket may
be viewed at https://www.regulations.gov/#!docketDetail;D=APHIS-2015-
0073 or in our reading room, which is located in room 1141 of the USDA
South Building, 14th Street and Independence Avenue SW., Washington,
DC. Normal reading room hours are 8 a.m. to 4:30 p.m., Monday through
Friday, except holidays. To be sure someone is there to help you,
please call (202) 799-7039 before coming.
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT: Mr. David B. Lamb, Senior Regulatory
Policy Specialist, USDA/APHIS/PPQ, 4700 River Road Unit 133, Riverdale,
MD 20737-1236; (301) 851-2103; David.B.Lamb@aphis.usda.gov.
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION:
Background
Under the regulations in ``Subpart--Fruits and Vegetables'' (7 CFR
319.56-1 through 319.56-74, referred to below as the regulations or the
fruits and vegetables regulations), the Animal and Plant Health
Inspection Service (APHIS) of the United States Department of
Agriculture (USDA) prohibits or restricts the importation of fruits and
vegetables into the United States from certain parts of the world to
prevent plant pests from being introduced into and spread within the
United States.
Currently, Sec. 319.56-22 provides conditions for importation of
fresh apple fruit (Malus domestica Borkh.) from Belgium, Denmark,
France, Germany, Great Britain, Italy, the Netherlands, Northern
Ireland, Norway, Portugal, the Republic of Ireland, Spain, Sweden, and
Switzerland, and fresh pear fruit (Pyrus communis L.) from Belgium,
France, Great Britain, Italy, the Netherlands, Portugal, and Spain,
into the United States under a preclearance program. Conditions for
importation of fresh apple and pear fruit from the above countries
include a trust fund agreement between the national plant protection
organization (NPPO) of the exporting country and APHIS; orchard and
packinghouse inspections for Leucoptera malifoliella and other
quarantine plant pests; approved mitigations for infested orchards;
cold treatment of fruit against Mediterranean fruit fly (Ceratitis
capitata, or Medfly) in countries where the pest is known to occur;
identification of orchards and packinghouses for traceback of each
consignment; packinghouse handling and safeguarding requirements for
fruit intended for shipment to the United States; and preclearance
inspection.
As an alternative to the preclearance program, the European
Commission, the executive body of the European Union (EU), has
requested that APHIS amend the regulations to allow the importation
into the continental United States from certain EU countries of fresh
apple and pear fruit that has been produced in accordance with an
approved systems approach. Any alternative approach to the preclearance
program for importing these articles requires that the current
regulations be amended.
As part of our evaluation of the EU's request, we prepared a pest
list \1\ of quarantine pests that could follow the pathway of
commercial shipments of fresh apple and pear fruit into the continental
United States from the EU member countries included in the request. A
quarantine pest is defined in Sec. 319.56-2 as ``a pest of potential
economic importance to the area endangered thereby and not yet present
there, or present but not widely distributed and being officially
controlled.'' The pest list reported 32 quarantine pests (26
arthropods, 1 bacterium, 4 fungi and 1 viroid) that may follow the
pathway of commercial shipments of apples and pears into the
continental United States. They are:
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\1\ ``Pest List for Importation of Fresh Fruit of Apple, Malus
domestica, and Pear, Pyrus communis, into the Continental United
States from eight countries in the European Union (Belgium, Germany,
France, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Spain, the Netherlands)'' (USDA,
2014).
Arthropods:
Adoxophyes orana (Fischer von R[ouml]eslerstamm) (Lepidoptera:
Tortricidae)
Aphanostigma piri (Cholodkovsky) (Hemiptera: Phylloxeridae)
[[Page 3034]]
Archips podana (Scopoli) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)
Argyrotaenia pulchellana (Haworth) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)
Ceratitis capitata (Wiedemann) (Diptera: Tephritidae)
Ceroplastes japonicus Green (Hemiptera: Coccidae)
Choristoneura hebenstreitella (Muller) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)
Cryptoblabes gnidiella (Milliere) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)
Cydia pyrivora (Danilevsky) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)
Diloba caeruleocephala (L.) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)
Eutetranychus orientalis (Klein) (Acari: Tetranychidae)
Euzophera bigella (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae)
Grapholita funebrana Treitschke (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)
Grapholita lobarzewskii (Nowicki) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)
Hedya pruniana (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)
Lacanobia oleracea L. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)
Leucoptera malifoliella (Costa) (Lepidoptera: Lyonetiidae)
Lobesia botrana Dennis & Schiffermuller (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)
Mamestra brassicae L. (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae)
Pammene rhediella (Clerck) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)
Pandemis cerasana (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)
Pandemis heparana (Denis & Schiffermuller) (Lepidoptera:
Tortricidae)
Rhynchites aequatus (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)
Rhynchites auratus (Scopoli) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)
Rhynchites bacchus (L.) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae)
Syndemis musculana (Hubner) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae)
Bacteria:
Erwinia pyrifoliae Kim et al.
Fungi:
Alternaria gaisen Nagano (Ascomycetes: Pleosporales)
Ascochyta pyricola Sacc. (Ascomycetes: Pleosporales)
Monilinia fructigena Honey ex Whetzel (Ascomycetes: Helotiales)
Monilinia polystroma (G.C.M. Leeuwen) Kohn (Ascomycetes: Helotiales)
Viroid:
Pear blister canker viroid (PBCVd) \2\
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\2\ Apples and pears infected with the plant pathogenic pear
blister canker viroid (PBCVd) are not a pathway. The pathogen is not
insect or seed transmitted, and cannot be transmitted from the
vascular tissue of fruit (Hadidi et al., 2011). This systemic
pathogen could be present in the fruit, but it will not establish in
the United States because the pathogen is neither seed transmitted
nor insect vectored (Flores et al., 2003). Since there is no
evidence that apples or pears are pathways for PBCVd (USDA, 2014) we
would not require any mitigation measures for the disease.
We prepared a risk management document (RMD) to determine what
phytosanitary measures should be applied to mitigate the pest risk
associated with the importation of fresh apple and pear fruit from
certain EU member countries into the continental United States. Copies
of the pest list and RMD may be obtained from the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT or viewed on the Regulations.gov Web
site (see ADDRESSES above for a link to Regulations.gov and information
on the location and hours of the reading room).
In the RMD, entitled, ``Importation of Fresh Fruit of Apple, Malus
domestica, and Pear, Pyrus communis, into the Continental United States
from eight countries in the European Union (Belgium, Germany, France,
Italy, Poland, Portugal, Spain, the Netherlands),'' (July 2015), we
determined that phytosanitary measures could be applied as a systems
approach to mitigate the risks of introducing or disseminating the
quarantine pests in the pest list into the continental United States.
Therefore, we are proposing to allow the importation of fresh apple and
pear fruit from the EU countries of Belgium, Germany, France, Italy,
Poland, Portugal, Spain, and the Netherlands into the continental
United States if the fruit is produced under the systems approach
described below. Fresh apple and pear fruit that does not meet the
conditions of the systems approach would still be allowed to be
imported into the continental United States if it is produced in
accordance with the requirements of Sec. 319.56-22. Fruit imported
under Sec. 319.56-22 would still be required to be in commercial
consignments and accompanied by documentation to validate foreign site
preclearance inspection after the required treatment is completed.
We have determined that the specific mitigation measures proposed
for the quarantine pests identified in the pest list, along with the
general requirements for the importation of fruits and vegetables in
the regulations, will be sufficient to prevent the introduction of
quarantine pests into the continental United States via importation of
fresh apple and pear fruit from the EU countries listed above.
Therefore, we are proposing to add the systems approach to the
regulations in a new Sec. 319.56-75.
General Requirements
Paragraph (a) of proposed Sec. 319.56-75 would set out general
requirements for the NPPO of the exporting country and for growers and
packers producing fresh apple and pear fruit for export to the
continental United States.
Paragraph (a)(1) of proposed Sec. 319.56-75 would require the NPPO
of the exporting country to develop an operational workplan, subject to
APHIS approval, that details the activities that the NPPO would carry
out to meet the requirements of proposed Sec. 319.56-75. An
operational workplan is an agreement developed between APHIS' Plant
Protection and Quarantine program, officials of the NPPO of a foreign
government, and, when necessary, foreign commercial entities, that
specifies in detail the phytosanitary measures that will be carried out
to comply with our regulations governing the importation of a specific
commodity. Operational workplans apply only to the signatory parties
and establish detailed procedures and guidance for the day-to-day
operations of specific import/export programs. Operational workplans
also establish how specific phytosanitary issues are dealt with in the
exporting country and make clear who is responsible for dealing with
those issues. The implementation of a systems approach typically
requires an operational workplan to be developed. The operational
workplan may include, but is not limited to, details of the orchard
monitoring, pest action thresholds, orchard phytosanitary measures
including removing fallen fruit, packinghouse inspection procedures,
and traceback requirements.
Paragraph (a)(2) of proposed Sec. 319.56-75 would state that only
commercial consignments of fresh apple and pear fruit from certain EU
countries would be allowed to be imported into the continental United
States. Commercial consignments, as defined in Sec. 319.56-2, are
consignments that an inspector identifies as having been imported for
sale and distribution. Such identification is based on a variety of
indicators, including, but not limited to: Quantity of produce, type of
packaging, identification of grower or packinghouse on the packaging,
and documents consigning the fruits or vegetables to a wholesaler or
retailer. Commercial consignments are less likely to be infested with
plant pests than noncommercial consignments. Noncommercial consignments
are more prone to infestations because the commodity is often ripe to
overripe, may be of a variety with unknown susceptibility to pests, and
is often grown with little or no pest control.
Production Site Requirements
Under proposed Sec. 319.56-75(b)(1), production sites where fresh
apple or pear fruit is grown would be required to be registered with
the NPPO of the exporting country. Such registration would facilitate
traceback of a
[[Page 3035]]
consignment of fresh apple or pear fruit to the production site in the
event that quarantine pests were discovered in the consignment at the
port of first arrival into the continental United States. APHIS would
reserve the right to conduct oversight visits at the production site in
the event of pest interceptions or other problems.
Under proposed paragraph (b)(2), the registered grower of the
production site would be responsible for following the phytosanitary
measures agreed upon by APHIS and the NPPO of the exporting country,
including removal of fallen fruit and other control measures that are
authorized for use in the EU and the United States to reduce pest
populations. The NPPO of the exporting country or officials authorized
by the NPPO would be responsible for monitoring pest populations at
production sites in order to determine the need and timing of such
control measures and ensure effective control of pests. The NPPO would
also be required to ensure that registered production sites are
inspected twice every season, with special emphasis on quarantine pests
listed in the operational workplan.
Details of production site traceback and pest monitoring
requirements, pest action thresholds, field sanitation, and other
phytosanitary measures would be included in the operational workplan
approved by the NPPO of the exporting country and APHIS.
Paragraph 319.56-75(b)(3) would require that apple and pear
propagative material introduced into registered production sites be
certified free of quarantine pests by the NPPO of the exporting
country.
Packinghouse Requirements
Paragraph (c) of proposed Sec. 319.56-75 would set forth
requirements for pest mitigation, fruit sampling, inspection, and other
measures that would have to take place at registered packinghouses
under the operational workplan.
Under proposed Sec. 319.75(c)(1), all fresh apple and pear fruit
for export to the United States would be required to be packed in
packinghouses that are registered and approved by the NPPO of the
exporting country. Packinghouses would have to be able to exclude plant
pests and have a tracking system to identify individual production
sites. Requirements for packinghouse specifications and procedures
would be detailed in the operational workplan.
Under proposed Sec. 319.75(c)(2), packinghouses would not be
permitted to pack apple or pear fruit for other countries while packing
for the continental United States. All leaves would have to be removed
from fruit to remove the leaf mining pest Leucoptera malifoliella.
Packinghouse culling and inspection procedures would have to be
followed to remove fruit with pupae of Leucoptera malifoliella. These
procedures would be detailed in the operational workplan.
Under paragraph (c)(3), all packed fruit intended for shipment to
the United States would need to be safeguarded from infestation by
fruit flies and other pests at the packinghouse and during transport to
the continental United States. Safeguarding measures for packinghouses
and packed fruit, which would be detailed in the operational workplan,
include protecting fruit by a pest-proof screen or plastic tarpaulin
while the fruit is in transit to the packinghouse and while awaiting
packing. Other safeguarding measures include the use of packinghouse
screens and double doors that are sufficient to prevent pests from
entering the packing area and requiring fruit to be packed in insect-
proof cartons or containers, or covered with insect-proof mesh or a
plastic tarpaulin, for transport to the United States.
Under proposed paragraph (c)(4), apple and pear fruit would have to
be held in a cold storage facility while awaiting export. If any other
fruit from unregistered production sites are stored in the same
facility, the apple and pear fruit must be isolated from that other
fruit.
Under proposed Sec. 319.75(c)(5), each shipping box would need to
be marked with the identity of the packing facility, the production
site, and grower or grower organization to enable trace back as
necessary.
Mitigations for Medfly
Under proposed Sec. 319.56-75(d), apple and pear fruit being
exported from countries where APHIS has determined that Medfly is known
to occur would be required to undergo cold treatment in accordance with
the phytosanitary treatments regulations in 7 CFR part 305. Currently,
treatment schedule T 107-a \3\ is approved for apples and pears from
countries where Medfly is known to occur. Details of required cold
treatment procedures would be included in the operational workplan.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
\3\ USDA/PPQ Treatment Manual, section 5, Treatment Schedules.
https://www.aphis.usda.gov/import_export/plants/manuals/ports/downloads/treatment.pdf.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Phytosanitary Inspection
Paragraph Sec. 319.56-75(e) would require that, after post-harvest
processing, the NPPO of the exporting country or officials authorized
by the NPPO of the exporting country inspect the apple and pear fruit
for signs of pest infestation and confirm absence of the pests listed
in the operational workplan. Upon detection of Adoxophyes orana,
Alternaria gaisen, Argyrotaenia pulchellana, Ascochyta piricola,
Ceratitis capitata, Grapholita (Cydia) funebrana, Leucoptera
malifoliella, Monilinia fructigena and/or Monilinia polystroma in a
consignment for export, the NPPO of the exporting country would be
required to reject that consignment and may, under conditions specified
in the operational workplan, be required to suspend the production site
and/or packinghouse from importation to the continental United States
for the remainder of that season. If any of these pests are found in a
consignment at U.S. ports of entry, APHIS may, under conditions
specified in the operational workplan, reject the consignment and
suspend imports from the production site and/or packinghouse until an
investigation is completed by the NPPO of the exporting country and
APHIS. The investigation may include site visits by APHIS and reports
from the NPPO of the exporting country. Procedures for suspension of
production sites and/or packinghouses would be detailed in the
operational workplan. The exportation to the continental United States
of fresh apple and pear fruit from a suspended production site and/or
packinghouse may resume in the next growing season if an investigation
is conducted and APHIS and the NPPO of the exporting country agree that
appropriate remedial actions have been taken.
Phytosanitary Certificate
Paragraph Sec. 319.56-75 (f) would require that each consignment
of fresh apple or pear fruit be accompanied by a phytosanitary
certificate issued by the NPPO of the exporting country. Requiring a
phytosanitary certificate ensures that the NPPO of the exporting
country has inspected the fruit and certified that the fruit meets the
conditions under the systems approach for export to the continental
United States.
APHIS has determined that the above risk management measures under
the proposed systems approach will mitigate the risk of pest
introductions on fresh apple and pear fruit from Belgium, Germany,
France, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Spain, and the Netherlands into the
continental United States.
Executive Order 12866 and Regulatory Flexibility Act
This proposed rule has been reviewed under Executive Order 12866.
The
[[Page 3036]]
proposed rule has been determined to be not significant for the
purposes of Executive Order 12866 and, therefore, has not been reviewed
by the Office of Management and Budget.
In accordance with 5 U.S.C. 603, we have performed an initial
regulatory flexibility analysis, which is summarized below, regarding
the economic effects of this proposed rule on small entities. Copies of
the full analysis are available by contacting the person listed under
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION CONTACT or on the Regulations.gov Web site (see
ADDRESSES above for instructions for accessing Regulations.gov).
Based on the information we have, there is no reason to conclude
that adoption of this proposed rule would result in any significant
economic effect on a substantial number of small entities. However, we
do not currently have all of the data necessary for a comprehensive
analysis of the effects of this proposed rule on small entities.
Therefore, we are inviting comments on potential effects. In
particular, we are interested in determining the number and kind of
small entities that may incur benefits or costs from the implementation
of this proposed rule.
This proposed rule would allow the importation of fresh apples
(Malus domestica) and fresh pears (Pyrus communis) from eight European
Union (EU) countries (Belgium, France, Germany, Italy, the Netherlands,
Poland, Portugal, and Spain, referred to here as the EU-8) into the
continental United States, if they are produced in accordance with an
approved systems approach. At present, importation of fresh pear from
Germany and fresh apple and fresh pear from Poland is not allowed. For
the other EU-8 countries, this action would provide an alternative to
current preclearance import requirements.
The United States and the EU both have large apple and pear
industries. U.S. demand for EU-8 apples and pears imported under the
proposed rule would depend on relative prices and on market
characteristics as determined by domestic and foreign supplies and
consumer preferences. The competitiveness of EU-8 apples and pears
would largely rest on their prices, the varieties shipped, and their
quality.
The EU estimates that annual apple and pear exports by the EU-8 to
the United States would total 14,000 MT under the proposed rule. EU-8
apple and pear exports in recent years to countries outside of the EU
show the quantity of apples to have been four times that of pears. For
our analysis, we apportion the 14,000 MT similarly, that is, 80 percent
apple (11,200 MT) and 20 percent pear (2,800 MT).
Apple and pear imports from the EU-8 would directly compete with
U.S. produced fruit since the growing seasons are the same. Most apple
and pear imports by the United States come from southern hemisphere
countries (89 percent of apple imports, 78 percent of pear imports)
and, notwithstanding year-round storage capabilities, we expect any
displacement of apple and pear imports from current sources by EU-8
shipments would be limited due to different growing seasons. For this
analysis, we therefore assume that not more than 10 percent of U.S.
apple and pear imports from the EU-8 countries would displace imports
from elsewhere.
We use a non-spatial, net trade, partial equilibrium approach to
welfare analysis to compute expected impacts of the proposed rule on
U.S. producers and consumers. We model changes in U.S. consumption,
production, price, consumer welfare, and producer welfare for three
import levels (the expected quantity, and this quantity plus or minus
10 percent). In all cases, consumer welfare gains under the proposed
rule outweigh producer welfare losses, yielding a positive net welfare
impact. The expected net benefit for the two fruits exceeds $1.3
million per year.
For apples, producer welfare losses under the three import levels
range between $9.2 million and $11.2 million, the equivalent of about
0.3 percent of the annual value of fresh apple production. Consumer
welfare gains range between $10.0 million and $12.2 million, yielding
net welfare gains of between $800,000 and $1 million. Apple prices are
calculated to decline by about 0.5 percent when 11,200 MT of fresh
apples are imported annually from the EU-8. This quantity is equivalent
to about 0.5 percent of annual fresh apple consumption in the United
States.
For pears, producer welfare losses under the three import levels
range between $1.9 million and $2.3 million, coincidentally also
equivalent to about 0.3 percent of the annual value of fresh pear
production. Consumer welfare gains range between $2.3 million and $2.8
million, and net welfare gains are less than $500,000. Pear prices are
calculated to decline by about 0.4 percent when 2,800 MT of fresh pears
are imported annually from the EU-8. This quantity is equivalent to
about 0.7 percent of annual fresh pear consumption in the United
States. Small-entity apple and pear producers may be directly affected
by the proposed rule. Other small entities that may be affected include
those in auxiliary industries that support the production and
distribution of fresh apples and pears in the United States, as well as
importers of fresh apples and pears.
Executive Order 12988
This proposed rule would allow fresh apple and pear fruit to be
imported into the continental United States from certain EU countries
under a systems approach. If this proposed rule is adopted, State and
local laws and regulations regarding fresh apple and pear fruit
imported under this rule would be preempted while the fruit is in
foreign commerce. Fresh fruits are generally imported for immediate
distribution and sale to the consuming public and would remain in
foreign commerce until sold to the ultimate consumer. The question of
when foreign commerce ceases in other cases must be addressed on a
case-by-case basis. If this proposed rule is adopted, no retroactive
effect will be given to this rule, and this rule will not require
administrative proceedings before parties may file suit in court
challenging this rule.
Paperwork Reduction Act
In accordance with section 3507(d) of the Paperwork Reduction Act
of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.), the information collection or
recordkeeping requirements included in this proposed rule have been
submitted for approval to the Office of Management and Budget (OMB).
Please send written comments to the Office of Information and
Regulatory Affairs, OMB, Attention: Desk Officer for APHIS, Washington,
DC 20503. Please state that your comments refer to Docket No. APHIS-
2015-0073. Please send a copy of your comments to: (1) APHIS, using one
of the methods described under ADDRESSES at the beginning of this
document, and (2) Clearance Officer, OCIO, USDA, room 404-W, 14th
Street and Independence Avenue SW., Washington, DC 20250. A comment to
OMB is best assured of having its full effect if OMB receives it within
30 days of publication of this proposed rule.
The regulations in ``Subpart--Fruits and Vegetables'' (Title 7,
Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 319.56 through 319.56-74, referred to
as the regulations), prohibit or restrict the importation of fruits and
vegetables into the United States from certain parts of the world to
prevent the introduction and dissemination of plant pests that are new
to or not widely distributed with the United States.
APHIS is proposing to amend the regulations to allow the
importation of fresh apple and pear fruit from certain
[[Page 3037]]
countries in the European Union into the continental United States,
provided that the fruit is produced in accordance with a systems
approach, as an alternative to importation under the current
preclearance program. The proposed systems approach for fresh apple and
pear fruit consists of production site and packinghouse registration,
inspection of registered production sites twice a season, production
site pest control and sanitation, post-harvest safeguards, fruit
culling, traceback, sampling, cold treatment against Mediterranean
fruit fly in countries where the pest is known to occur, a
phytosanitary certificate, port of entry inspection, and importation as
commercial consignments only. Fresh apple and pear fruit that does not
meet the requirements in the systems approach would continue to be
allowed to be imported into the United States subject to the conditions
of the preclearance program.
This action would provide an alternative for the importation of
fresh apple and pear fruit from certain countries in the European Union
while continuing to provide protection against the introduction of
plant pests into the continental United States.
Implementing this rule will require an operational workplan,
production site and packing house registrations, tracking system,
monitoring, inspections, investigations, box markings, cold treatment
burden requirements, and phytosanitary certificates.
We are soliciting comments from the public (as well as affected
agencies) concerning our proposed information collection and
recordkeeping requirements. These comments will help us:
(1) Evaluate whether the proposed information collection is
necessary for the proper performance of our agency's functions,
including whether the information will have practical utility;
(2) Evaluate the accuracy of our estimate of the burden of the
proposed information collection, including the validity of the
methodology and assumptions used;
(3) Enhance the quality, utility, and clarity of the information to
be collected; and
(4) Minimize the burden of the information collection on those who
are to respond (such as through the use of appropriate automated,
electronic, mechanical, or other technological collection techniques or
other forms of information technology; e.g., permitting electronic
submission of responses).
Estimate of burden: Public reporting burden for this collection of
information is estimated to average .00627 hours per response.
Respondents: Foreign businesses and NPPOs.
Estimated annual number of respondents: 72.
Estimated annual number of responses per respondent: 2,230.
Estimated annual number of responses: 160,553.
Estimated total annual burden on respondents: 1,007 hours. (Due to
averaging, the total annual burden hours may not equal the product of
the annual number of responses multiplied by the reporting burden per
response.)
Copies of this information collection can be obtained from Ms.
Kimberly Hardy, APHIS' Information Collection Coordinator, at (301)
851-2727.
E-Government Act Compliance
The Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service is committed to
compliance with the EGovernment Act to promote the use of the Internet
and other information technologies, to provide increased opportunities
for citizen access to Government information and services, and for
other purposes. For information pertinent to E-Government Act
compliance related to this proposed rule, please contact Ms. Kimberly
Hardy, APHIS' Information Collection Coordinator, at (301) 851-2727.
List of Subjects in 7 CFR Part 319
Coffee, Cotton, Fruits, Imports, Logs, Nursery stock, Plant
diseases and pests, Quarantine, Reporting and recordkeeping
requirements, Rice, Vegetables.
Accordingly, we propose to amend 7 CFR part 319 as follows:
PART 319--FOREIGN QUARANTINE NOTICES
0
1. The authority citation for part 319 continues to read as follows:
Authority: 7 U.S.C. 450, 7701-7772, and 7781-7786; 21 U.S.C. 136
and 136a; 7 CFR 2.22, 2.80, and 371.3.
0
2. In Sec. 319.56-22, the introductory text of paragraph (a) is
revised to read as follows:
Sec. 319.56-22 Apples and pears from certain countries in Europe.
(a) Importations allowed. The following fruits may be imported into
the United States in accordance with this section and all other
applicable provisions of this subpart. See Sec. 319.56-75 for
alternative provisions authorizing the importation of apples and pears
from certain countries in Europe.
* * * * *
0
3. Section 319.56-75 is added to subpart--Fruits and Vegetables to read
as follows:
Sec. 319.56-75 Fresh apple and pear fruit from Belgium, Germany,
France, Italy, Poland, Portugal, Spain and the Netherlands.
Fresh apple (Malus domestica Borkh.) and fresh pear (Pyrus communis
L.) fruit from Belgium, Germany, France, Italy, Poland, Portugal,
Spain, and the Netherlands may be imported into the continental United
States in accordance with the conditions listed in this section. See
Sec. 319.56-22 for alternative provisions authorizing the importation
of apples and pears from certain countries in Europe.
(a) General requirements. (1) The NPPO of the exporting country
must develop an operational workplan, subject to APHIS approval, that
details the activities that the NPPO would carry out to meet the
requirements of this section.
(2) The fresh apple and pear fruit must be imported in commercial
consignments only.
(b) Production site requirements. (1) Production sites where the
fresh apple and pear fruit is grown must be registered with the NPPO of
the exporting country.
(2) The registered grower of the production site must follow the
phytosanitary measures agreed upon by APHIS and the NPPO of the
exporting country in the operational workplan, including applying
control measures that are authorized for use in the EU and the United
States to reduce pest populations. The NPPO of the exporting country or
officials authorized by the NPPO must monitor pest populations at
production sites in order to determine the need and timing of such
control measures and ensure effective control of pests. The NPPO must
also ensure that registered production sites are inspected twice every
season with emphasis on the quarantine pests listed in the operational
workplan.
(3) Any apple and pear propagative material introduced into
registered production sites must be certified free of quarantine pests
by the NPPO of the exporting country.
(c) Packinghouse requirements. (1) All fresh apple and pear fruit
for export to the continental United States must be packed in
packinghouses that are registered and approved by the NPPO of the
exporting country. Packinghouses must be able to exclude plant pests
and have a tracking system to identify individual production sites in
accordance with the operational workplan.
[[Page 3038]]
(2) Packinghouses must not pack apple and pear fruit for other
countries while packing for shipment to the continental United States.
All leaves must be removed from the fruit to remove Leucoptera
malifoliella, and packinghouse culling and inspection procedures must
be followed to remove fruit with pupae of Leucoptera malifoliella.
(3) All packed fruit intended for shipment to the continental
United States must be safeguarded from infestation by fruit flies and
other pests while at the packinghouse and during shipment to the
continental United States in accordance with the operational workplan.
(4) Apple and pear fruit must be held in a cold storage facility
while awaiting export. If any other fruit from unregistered production
sites are stored in the same facility, the apple and pear fruit must be
isolated from that other fruit.
(5) Each shipping box must be marked with the identity of the
packing facility, the production site, and grower or grower
organization to ensure traceback.
(d) Mitigation for Mediterranean fruit fly. Apple and pear fruit
being exported from countries where Mediterranean fruit fly is known to
occur must undergo cold treatment in accordance with the phytosanitary
treatments regulations in part 305 of this chapter. Cold treatment
procedures and schedules will be included in the operational workplan.
(e) Phytosanitary inspection. After post-harvest processing, the
NPPO of the exporting country or officials authorized by the NPPO of
the exporting country must inspect the apple and pear fruit for signs
of pest infestation and confirm absence of the pests listed in the
operational workplan. Upon detection of Adoxophyes orana, Alternaria
gaisen, Argyrotaenia pulchellana, Ascochyta piricola, Ceratitis
capitata, Grapholita (Cydia) funebrana, Leucoptera malifoliella,
Monilinia fructigena and/or Monilinia polystroma in a consignment for
export, the NPPO of the exporting country must reject the consignment
and may, under conditions specified in the operational workplan, be
required to suspend the production site and/or packinghouse from
importation to the continental United States for the remainder of that
season. If any of these pests are found in a consignment at U.S. ports
of entry, APHIS may, under conditions specified in the operational
workplan, reject the consignment and suspend the production site and/or
packinghouse from importation to the continental United States until an
investigation is completed by the NPPO of the exporting country and
APHIS. The investigation may include site visits by APHIS and/or
reports from the NPPO of the exporting country. Procedures for
suspension of production sites and/or packinghouses will be detailed in
the operational workplan. The exportation to the continental United
States of fresh apple and pear fruit from a suspended production site
and/or packinghouse may resume in the next growing season if an
investigation is conducted and APHIS and the NPPO of the exporting
country agree that appropriate remedial actions have been taken.
(f) Phytosanitary certificate. Each consignment of fresh apple or
pear fruit must be accompanied by a phytosanitary certificate issued by
the NPPO of the exporting country certifying that the fruit meets the
conditions under this section for export to the continental United
States.
Done in Washington, DC, this 13th day of January 2016.
Kevin Shea,
Administrator, Animal and Plant Health Inspection Service.
[FR Doc. 2016-00992 Filed 1-19-16; 8:45 am]
BILLING CODE 3410-34-P